A governments role is only to provide defence capability and urban

infrastructure (roads, water supplies, etc.). All other services (education, health,
social security) should be provided by private groups or individuals in the
community.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge
or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Sample Answer:
Nowadays, the responsibilities of the government are being debated quite a lot by the people and
human rights activists. The state role should only be limited, restricted and confined to few
sectors or it should cover every aspect of their citizens and residents wellbeing is a topic of great
debate. It has been argued that the government should only be accountable for developing
countrys military capabilities and infrastructure enhancement or it should be responsible for
other important facilities i.e. education, medical, social protection as well. I strongly believe that
all the aspects of life associated with state citizens should be directly undertaken, developed,
maintained and operated by the state authorities. This argument will be proven by taking into
account availability of resources with government and monopoly by private entities and
individuals.
Firstly, the funds and financing available by the state is substantially high giving them the
cushion to allocated funds and projects for every sector according to its requirements. For
instance, the state collects the tax from its citizens on the reason and commitment that the
taxpayers money will again be spent by utilizing on the development and improvement in
infrastructure, healthcare, transportation system etc. On the contrary if it refuses to oblige and
falls back on the commitment of spending money on public it could result in reduction in
popularity and tax collection. The example shows clearly that the government has the money
available in its pool which could be wisely spent for every department and sector. This is evident
from the above discussion that budgetary allocation should be done to all public sectors for
facilitating general public.
Secondly, depending on private companies and personnel to establish such important divisions
i.e. medical, education etc. can create monopoly and result in deprivation of these facilities for
underprivileged people. For instance, the private owner will develop any of the hospital for
commercial purposes and the poor people wont be able to afford that treatment. This example
illustrates that the private people should not be given the sole responsibility to manage these core

sectors. Thus, it can be seen that giving individual companies this major role could sabotage the
lives of underserved people of the society.
In a nutshell, the resources present with the state and cartel thinking of individuals should be
kept in mind by the state authorities for developing or upgrading country. I do believe that the
state should be completely responsible for building the basic necessities concerning their citizen
life and health. I suppose, going other way round could complicate the problems for sitting
government as private individuals could be involved in blackmailing in case their demands are
not met.