Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Seismic Response
Earthquake forces are different than gravity and wind
loads. They are internally generated inertia forces
caused by the acceleration of ground motion and the
building mass.
A c ce le ra tio n (cm /s 2 )
400
300
200
100
0
-100 0
-200
-300
-400
8
Time (sec)
Performance Criterion
Buildings will be designed to maintain their
structural integrity and ensure life-safety in the event
of a strong earthquake, even though they may be
damaged substantially beyond repair.
Buildings will be designed to survive a medium
seismic event with some repairable damage.
Buildings will be designed to survive a low level
seismic event without damage.
Post-disaster buildings are expected to remain
operational after a strong earthquake.
Spectral
Uniform
S(T) = Fa Sa(0.2)
S(T) = Fv Sa(0.5) or
S(T) = Fa Sa(0.2)
whichever is smaller
S(T) = Fv Sa(1.0)
S(T) = Fv Sa(2.0)
S(T) = Fv Sa(2.0)/2
Table 4.1.8.4.A.
Site Classification for Seismic Site Response
Forming Part of Sentences 4.1.8.4.(2) and (3)
Site
Class
A
B
C
D
E
E
Hard Rock
Rock
Very Dense Soil
and Soft Rock
Stiff Soil
Soft Soil
(1) Others
V s > 1500
760 < V s .1500
360 < V s < 760
Standard
Penetration
Resistance, N
Soil Undrained
Shear Strength, su
60
Not applicable
Not applicable
N 60 > 50
Not applicable
Not applicable
su > 100kPa
Sa(0.2)
0.25
0.7
0.8
1.0
1.3
2.1
Values of Fa
Sa(0.2)
Sa(0.2) =
Sa(0.2) =
0.75
=1.00
0.50
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.4
1.1
0.9
Site specific investigation required
Sa(0.2) =
1.25
0.8
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
Sa(1.0) <
0.1
0.5
0.6
1.0
1.4
2.1
Values of Fv
Sa(1.0) =
Sa(1.0) =
Sa(1.0)
0.2
0.3
=0.4
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.8
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.2
1.1
2.0
1.9
1.7
Site specific investigation required
Sa(1.0) >
0.5
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.1
1.7
Importance Factor
Ie = 0.8
Low occupancy
Ie = 1.3
Ie = 1.5
Ie = 1.0
Ie Fa Sa(T)
Modification Factor
for Site Soil
Conditions
5% Damped Spectral
Acceleration for
Reference Soil
Conditions
Method of Analysis
Dynamic Analysis (Preferred Method)
Elastic Spectral Analysis
Elastic Time History Analysis
Inelastic Time History Analysis
Equivalent Static Force Procedure
Modes of Vibration
3-Storey Frame
Mode 1
Mode 2
Mode 3
Ve
Ve /Rd
Ve /Rd Ro
Cut-off Values
Because of uncertainties associated with UHS
values for Ta > 2.0 sec, V is not reduced beyond
the value at S(2.0)
S(2.0)I E W
V
R dR o
For Rd 1.5, V need not exceed:
2 S(0.2)I E W
V
3 R dR o
3.5
Period T, sec
3.0
2.5
2.0
3/4
T= 0.075 (hn )
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
Height hn, m
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
Period, T (sec)
2.00
1.50
T = 0.05 hn
3/4
1.00
0.50
0.00
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
Height, hn (m)
50.00
60.00
70.00
Period, T (sec)
2
1.5
1
T = 0.09 hn / D
1/2
0.5
0
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
H/D
1/2
10.0
12.0
14.0
6. 0 m
6. 0 m
6. 0 m
6. 0 m
3 @ 6 m = 18 m
3 @ 6 m = 18 m
Period, T (sec)
15 storey building
NBCC (5 storeys)
3
2
1
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Computed Period (sec)
2.0
2.5
Rd Ductility Related
Force Modification Factor
1.0 Rd 5.0
Established by tests, non-linear analysis of structural
systems and field assessment of actual structural
behaviour.
Indicates the ability of structure to undergo
deformations beyond yielding without a significant
loss of strength, while dissipating energy under
hysteretic loading
Rd Ductility Related
Force Modification Factor
Park and Paulay (1975) and Paulay and Priestley
(1992) found that Rd 5 in multi-degree-of-freedom
structures.
Because of the field observations after the 1985
Mexico City E.Q., the Mexico Code (1987) reduced
Q factor (Rd) from 6.0 to 4.0.
2001 draft of Eurocode 8 (ECS 1998) recommends a
q factor (Rd) to vary between 1.0 and 5.0
Rd Ductility Related
Force Modification Factor
In order for the structure to have sufficient
ductility and energy absorption capacity,
consistent with the Rd used in design, the
structure must conform to:
Relevant CSA Standard
The Capacity Design requirements
Ro Overstrength Related
Force Modification Factor
Structures, particularly the more ductile ones can
have considerable reserve strength not explicitly
considered in NBCC - 1995
Old Codes have attempted to calibrate seismic
design force levels to historical levels deemed
appropriate (i.e., U factor)
Ro Overstrength Related
Force Modification Factor
NBCC 2005 Explicitly accounts for overstrength in
structures
Only dependable or minimum overstrength is
considered
Rsize Overstrength
Related to Member Size
Standard member sizes used in practice result in
overstrength, i.e., restricted sizes of steel shapes,
plates, re-bars, timber and masonry elements.
Practical design considerations often lead to
conservative rounding of elements, such as spacing of
connectors and reinforcing elements.
Rsize = 1.05 for R/C structures
1.05 to 1.10 for structural steel
1.05 to 1.15 for timber and masonry
R Overstrength Related to
Material Resistance () Factors
It is appropriate to use nominal resistances when
designing for an extremely rare event, such as an
earthquake with a return period of 2500 years.
R = 1/
R/C and RM
0.85
1.18
Structural Steel
0.90
1.11
Timber
0.70
1.43
URM
1.00
1.00
Elastic Behaviour
bf
bf
cf
cf
Beam Yielding
2
1
by
by
3
2
1
bu
bu
cu
cu
Rmech = 1.00
Except for;
Rmech
1.10
1.05
1.05
R/C Structures
Rd
Ro
4.0
2.5
1.7
1.4
4.0
3.5
3.5
2.0
1.5
1.5
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.0
1.0
Wi h i
(V Ft )
Fi =
Wi h i
Ft = 0
for
Ta 0.7
Ft = 0.07Ta V
Ft = 0.25V
for
Ta 3.6
Overturning Moments
Overturning Moments
M x = J x Fi (h i h x )
i =1
J x = 1.0
for hx 0.6hn
hx
J x = J + (1 J )
hn
Torsional Effects
Torsional Effects
Torsion will be considered when:
Torsional moments are introduced by the
eccentricity between the centres of mass and
resistance.
Torsional moments are generated due to
accidental eccentricities.
Torsional sensitivity is established by computing
Bx for each level x when equivalent static forces
are acting at 0.10 Dnx from the centre of mass.
Bx = max / ave
Torsional Effects
Torsional Effects
For buildings with B 1.7; apply torsional
moments about a vertical axis at each level
computed for each of the following two loading
cases:
i. Tx = Fx (ex + 0.10 Dnx)
ii. Tx = Fx (ex - 0.10 Dnx)
For buildings with B > 1.7 in cases where
IEFaSa(0.2) 0.35 by Dynamic Analysis
Structural Irregularities
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Irregularity trigger
When:
IEFaSa(0.2) 0.35
+ any one of the 8 irregularity types,
the special design provisions for
irregular structures apply. However, post
disaster buildings should never have
irregularity type 6 (weak storey)
Types of Irregularities
1. Vertical Stiffness
Lateral stiffness of the SFRS in a storey:
< 70% of that in any adjacent storey, or
< 80% of the average stiffness of the 3
storeys above or below.
Types of Irregularities
2. Weight (Mass)
weight of a storey > 150% of weight of an
adjacent storey.
(a roof lighter than a floor below is excluded)
Types of Irregularities
3.
Vertical Geometric
horizontal dimension of the SFRS in a storey
> 130% of that in any adjacent storey.
(one-storey penthouse excluded)
Types of Irregularities
4. In-Plane Discontinuity
in-plane offset of an element of the SFRS,
or
reduction in lateral stiffness of an element in
the storey below.
Types of Irregularities
5. Out-of-Plane Offsets
discontinuity of lateral force path
e.g., out-of-plane offsets
of the elements of the SFRS.
Bottom Floors
Top Floors
Types of Irregularities
6. Discontinuity in Capacity - Weak Storey
storey shear strength less than
that in the storey above.
(Storey shear strength = total of all elements of the
SFRS in the direction considered)
Types of Irregularities
7. Torsional sensitivity
if the ratio B > 1.7.
B = max / avg
calculated for static loads applied at 0.10 Dn
Plan
Types of Irregularities
8. Non-orthogonal systems
SFRS not oriented along a set of orthogonal axes.
Plan
Irregular SFRS
Stiffness of non-structural components
shall not be included to make an irregular
SFRS regular.
Irregular SFRS
For sites with IEFaSa(0.2) 0.35 dynamic
analysis is required if h 20 m, T 0.5 s or
Type 7 (Torsion) irregularity.
For fundamental period equal to or greater
than 1.0 s and IEFvSa(1.0) > 0.25, walls
forming parts of SFRS shall be continuous
from ground to top levels and shall not
have irregularity types 4 (in-plane
discont.), 5 (out-of-plane offsets)
Irregular SFRS
Irregularity type 6 (weak storey) not permitted except
if IEFaSa(0.2) < 0.2 and the design base shear = RdRoV.
Post-disaster buildings shall not have any
irregularity of:
types 1 (vert. stiffness), 3 (vert. geom.), 4 (in-plane
discont.), 5 (out-of-plane offsets) or 7 (torsion) if
IEFaSa(0.2) > 0.35;
type 6 (weak storey).
2005 NBCC
IEFaSa(0.2)
2005 NBCC
400
300
200
100
0
-100 0
-200
-300
-400
8
Time (sec)
Modes of Vibration
3-Storey Frame
Mode 1
Mode 2
Mode 3
Dynamic Analysis
Linear (Elastic) Dynamic Analysis
Modal Response Spectrum Analysis
Numerical Integration Time History Analysis
Non-linear (Inelastic) Dynamic Analysis
Numerical Integration Time History Analysis
100
200
300
Time, t
SPECTRAL ANALYSIS
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0
0.5
Period, T
1.5
i =
m
j1
n
i, j
m j i, j
j=1
Fi, j = i, j i S(Ti )m j
i, j = i, j i
Ti 2
4
S(Ti )
Vi, x = Fi, j
j= x
Vi = Fi, j
j=1
Fx =
Ve =
Fi , x
i =1
V
i =1
Vx =
x =
V
i =1
i,x
i =1
2
i,x
Ve
Vd =
IE
R oR d
8. If Vd < 0.8 V (by Eq. Static Load)
Then Vd = 0.8V, except for irregular
structures requiring dynamic analysis
in which case Vd is taken as the larger of
Vd and 100% of V
T1=1.56 s
T2=0.56 s
T3=0.34 s
1=1.25
2=0.39
3=0.21
S1=0.24g
S2=0.59g
S3=0.77g
1765
-1247
726
2280
1623
-386
-518
1747
1347
764
-872
1777
964
1399
270
1720
503
6202
1067
1597
949
555
1514
6428
Floor
F
j=1
i, j
Fx =
Fi , x
i =1
Ve
6428
Vd =
IE =
(1.0) = 945 kN
R oR d
(4.0)(1.7)
Structural Modelling
Structural Modelling
Structural Modelling
Structural Modelling
Member Modelling
Lo
12
t
Member Modelling
m
h
Member Modelling
Mi
Mj
l
l
Flexural Springs
cr
Bilinear Idealization
n
Formation
of a Plastic
Hinge
400
-6
-4
-2
200
0
-200
M = F l + P
-400
-120 -80 -40
0
40 80
Displacement, (mm)
120
By Clough (1966)
By Takeda (1970)
Strength
decay
Anchorage Slip
s
s
h
Hysteretic Modelling
In spite of all the complications of hysteretic
behaviour of structural elements and subassemblages, it is possible to select reasonably
simple hysteretic models for inelastic seismic
analysis of structures.
Thank You