Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Rules
INCOTERMS 2010 Rules
The Incoterms 2010 rules* (International Commercial Terms) were developed by the International Chamber of
Commerce (ICC) as a uniform set of rules to clarify the costs, risks and obligations of buyers and sellers in
international commercial transactions. Because they address issues relating to import and export, Incoterms
2010 rules are most appropriate for use in international shipping; they are, however, used for U.S. domestic
shipping as well.
Incoterms 2010 rules are periodically revised and multiple versions are available for use by contracting parties.
The Incoterms 2010 rules became effective January 1, 2000, and remain in effect. The Incoterms 2010 rules are
effective as of January 1, 2011.
Refer to the ICC Web site at www.iccwbo.org/Incoterms/id3040/index.html for information about these terms and
their definitions, which are copyrighted by the ICC.
Note: Although the new Incoterms 2010 rules became available for use as of January 1, 2011,
Incoterms 2000 rules continue to be available. It is incumbent upon contracting parties to
determine which term they want to use and to designate the version being applied.
For some time Incoterms rules have consisted of 13 terms. Incoterms 2010 rules eliminate four of the
previously-existing terms (DDU, DES, DEQ and DAF) and add two new terms (DAT and DAP), resulting in a
total of 11 terms. The new version is made available for both domestic and international use; contracting parties
should, however, review the applicability of these terms to the domestic environment prior to applying them.
The terms are structured to increase incrementally the obligations (control, risk and cost) on one party while
decreasing the obligations of the other, depending on the specific term chosen. Each term clarifies which party is
responsible for:
Inland freight (transportation within the origination country)
Forwarder selection
Export clearance
Carrier selection and scheduling
International freight
Import clearance
On-carriage (transportation within the destination country)
Delivery occurs (and risk of loss transfers) at the point designated by the term selected. Transfer of title is NOT
covered by any of the Incoterms 2010 rules and must be separately specified by the parties.
Incoterms 2010 rules can be divided into two groups multi-modal (available for multiple forms of transport,
including land, air and waterway transportation) and single mode (applicable only to waterway transportation).
The terms in each group are listed on page 2 in order of increasing responsibility for the seller (and
correspondingly decreasing responsibility for the buyer). So, for example, using the term EXW makes the seller
responsible only for making the goods available at its own premises; delivery occurs and risk of loss transfers at
that point. When the term DDP is used, the seller becomes responsible for everything except on-carriage where
the location for delivery is not the buyers actual location. DDP is the only Incoterms rule that makes the seller
responsible for import clearance.
Buyers in the United States who are likely to be familiar with delivery terms defined within Articles 2 and 2A of the
Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) should pay particular attention to the overlap in the use of certain
terms/abbreviations between the Incoterms 2010 rules and the UCC. Free on board (F.O.B.), free alongside
(F.A.S.) and C.I.F. are all used in the UCC, but their definitions there are much different from the definition of the
same terms in the Incoterms 2010 rules. Under the Incoterms 2010 rules all three of the overlapping terms
(FOB, FAS and CIF) fall into the single mode group, meaning they can only be used for waterway transportation.
Under the UCC only F.A.S. is limited to use with a vessel.
Page 1 of 13
Numerous publications and seminars are available through the International Chamber of Commerce
(http://store.iccbooksusa.net/ or http://www.iccbooks.com/Home/Home.aspx) as well as from other organizations
explaining in depth the application of both the Incoterms 2000 rules and Incoterms 2010 rules.
TERM DEFINITION
The multi-modal (available for multiple forms of transport, including land, air and waterway transportation) terms are:
Unchanged
in
Incoterms
2010 rules
Unchanged
in
Incoterms
2010 rules
Unchanged
in
Incoterms
2010 rules
Unchanged
in
Incoterms
2010 rules
Eliminated
in
Incoterms
2010 rules
Page 2 of 13
TERM DEFINITION
New in
Incoterms
2010 rules
New in
Incoterms
2010 rules
Unchanged
in
Incoterms
2010 rules
The single mode terms (which can only be used with waterway transportation) are:
Unchanged
in
Incoterms
2010 rules
Unchanged
in
Incoterms
2010 rules
Unchanged
in
Incoterms
2010 rules
Page 3 of 13
TERM DEFINITION
Unchanged
in
Incoterms
2010 rules
Eliminated
in
Incoterms
2010 rules
Eliminated
in
Incoterms
2010 rules
Eliminated
in
Incoterms
2010 rules
Page 4 of 13
Page 5 of 13
Page 6 of 13
The Seller delivers the goods to the origin port. From that point, the Buyer bears
all costs and risks of loss or damage.
FOB - FREE ON BOARD (... named port of shipment)
The Seller delivers the goods on board the ship and clears the goods for export.
From that point, the Buyer bears all costs and risks of loss or damage.
CFR - COST AND FREIGHT (... named port of destination)
The Seller clears the goods for export and pays the costs of moving the goods to
destination. The Buyer bears all risks of loss or damage.
CIF - COST INSURANCE AND FREIGHT (... named port of destination)
The Seller clears the goods for export and pays the costs of moving the goods to
the port of destination. The Buyer bears all risks of loss or damage. The Seller,
however, purchases the cargo insurance.
Two new terms replace four current terms
DAT and DAP - that have replaced four of the Incoterms 2000 rules: DAF (Delivered at
Frontier), DES (Delivered Ex Ship), DEQ (Delivered Ex Quay) and DDU (Delivered Duty
Unpaid). This has reduced the total number of Incoterms rules from 13 to 11.
The new Incoterms 2010 rule DAT means Delivered At Terminal. This rule applies for any mode of transport
and specifies that the goods are placed at the buyers disposal unloaded from the arriving vehicle. Under
this rule a terminal is any place where the goods may be deposited; for example, a wharf, a container
yard, or an air cargo terminal. The parties to the contract of sale should be careful to specify as clearly as
possible the specific terminal and point within the terminal where the goods are to be unloaded. This is
because the risk of loss will stay with the seller until such delivery and it is important there will be no
confusion about the point at which the risk of loss passes to the buyer.
The other new Incoterm, DAP, means Delivered At Place. The DAP term differs from the DAT term in that,
when the goods are delivered to the place specified, the sellers obligation is to place them at the disposal
of the buyer on the arriving means of transport ready for unloading.
Whereas in the DAT term, the seller is responsible for unloading the goods, under the DAP term,it is the
buyers responsibility to unload the goods. If the seller wishes to use the DAP term, it should make sure that
its transportation contract matches its obligations. Otherwise, the seller could be charged for unloading
costs by the carrier and not be able to recover them from the buyer. Also under the DAP term, the seller is
responsible for clearing goods for export but the buyer is responsible for clearing goods for import. If the
buyer wishes to have the seller take responsibility for import clearance as well, it should use the DDP
(Delivered Duty Paid) term.
The Incoterms 2010 also eliminates the concept of delivery over the ships rail or past the
ships rail for the FOB, CFR and CIF terms. The concept of goods being loaded over the ships rail dates
back to a time when most cargoes were loaded in break bulk fashion and actually hoisted by cranes over the
ships rail. Previous versions of the Incoterms have specified that the sellers risk of loss, for example,
passed to the buyer at the specific point when the goods passed
over the ships rail on their way to being loaded. Today, most cargo is loaded in containersand, although
those containers are also loaded over the ships rail, the International Chamber of Commerce has decided to
employ the term On Board for the 2010 Incoterms, and presumably into the future, because this is a
concept that is more familiar to parties dealing with modern transportation and bill of lading terminology.
Risk (A5/B5)
The transfer of risk provision remains the same, aside from the clarification that risk
passes when the goods are on board the vessel, not when they pass over the ship's rail.
Electronic communication
Another change in the Incoterms 2010 is that they freely recognize electronic means of communication as
being equivalent to paper communication when the parties agree. Therefore, most of the Incoterms 2010
terms contain a specification that any document . . . may be an equivalent electronic record or procedure if
agreed between the parties or customary. Generally therefore, if the parties to a contract of sale wish to
Guide to the Incoterms 2010 Rules 2011 Updates
*Incoterms
Page 7 of 13
specify that electronic communications are the equivalent of paper communications, they should insert a
term dealing with this in the contract.
Insurance cover and security related clearances
The Incoterms 2010 also more prominently feature insurance and security-related obligations of the seller
and buyer in the various terms. The insurance obligations are now found in Paragraphs A-3 / B-3 under each
Incoterm. Security obligations; for example, the obligation to obtain security related clearances or chain-ofcustody information, are set forth in Paragraphs A-2 / B-2
of each Incoterm.
Contracts of Carriage/Insurance (A3/B3)
The seller is required to obtain cargo insurance complying at least with the minimum cover provided by
Clauses (C) of the Institute Cargo Clauses. Note, however, that this is the minimum level of insurance and
covers only major casualties, such as total loss of cargo. The buyer also has the option of requiring
that the seller provides, at the buyer's expense and where procurable, any
additional cover, for example, cover provided by Clauses (A) or (B) of the
Institute Cargo Clauses or any similar clauses and/or cover complying with the
Institute War Clauses and/or Institute Strikes Clauses or any similar set of clauses.
This acts as a sort insurance "bolt-on", but the buyer will be required to pay more
for this. If the buyer wishes for the seller to arrange for this "bolt-on" insurance, it is recommended that this
is included in the sale contract.
Terminal handling charges
The Incoterms 2010 also changed the way in which the obligation to pay terminal handling charges are
allocated. There are a number of the Incoterms rules that require the seller to make arrangements for the
carriage of goods to the agreed destination, which means the seller is
responsible for paying the freight charges to that destination. Sometimes these freight charges include the
terminal handling charges at destination and sometimes they dont. Since, as a practical matter, the buyer
will almost always be paying for the freight charges in the price of the goods, it is important to the buyer
that it not have to pay separately for terminal handling charges that are already included in the freight
charges and, therefore, in the cost of the goods. The
relevant Incoterms (CPT, CIP, CFR, CIF, DAT, DAP, and DDT) now include a clear allocation of terminal
handling costs in Paragraphs A-6 / B-6 of each such Incoterm.
Rules apply to domestic as well as international trade
The Incoterms have traditionally been used for international sale contracts even though some trade blocs,
such as the European Union, have minimised the significance of border formalities. The new Rules now
recognise that they can also be used for domestic sale contracts and reference is made in a number of the
Rules that export and import formalities will only need to be complied with where applicable. It is anticipated
that this change may encourage greater use
of the Rules in the USA in place of the former US Uniform Commercial Code.
Delivery (A4)/Taking Delivery (B4)
The delivery provisions are similar to INCOTERMS 2000, however, the seller's obligation is now to place the
goods "on board the vessel," rather than over the ship's rail at the loading port indicated by the buyer. The
"ship's rail" as the point of delivery has been omitted in preference for the goods being delivered on board
the vessel in order to more closely reflect modern commercial reality and to avoid costly disputes over when
exactly the goods pass the "ship's rail".
If no specific loading point has been indicated by the buyer, the new Terms make it clear that the seller may
select the point that best suits the seller's purpose. In practice, it would be sensible to include an express
provision enabling the seller to chose the loading point if that is what is agreed.
Finally the new Terms clarify that the seller may now perform its delivery obligation by procuring delivered
goods as opposed to deliver goods itself. This simply reflects the current accepted practice in string sales.
Guide to the Incoterms 2010 Rules 2011 Updates
*Incoterms
Page 8 of 13
Checking/Packaging/Marking (A9)
INCOTERMS 2010 provide that the seller must actually pack the goods; under the previous Terms the
obligation was only to provide packaging. In relation to the costs of "checking operations", the new Terms
now provide that the cost of any pre-shipment inspection required by the authority of the export country is
part of the costs that the seller must bear. Express terms should be used if the parties wish to allocate costs
differently. The corollary of this in B9 is that the buyer is to bear the costs of any other mandatory preshipment inspection. Again additional terms would still be useful to avoid arguments as to the nature of any
pre-shipment inspection.
In INCOTERMS 2000, there were no specific references to Institute Cargo Clauses (A), (B) and (C), as well as
the references to the Institute War Clauses and Institute Strikes Clauses.
Inspection (B9)
The buyer is to bear the costs of any mandatory pre-shipment inspection, except when such inspection is
mandated by the country of export.
Requirements and obligations associated with string sales recognised.
Incoterms 2010 recognises and clarifies the practice of string sales (ie, multiple sales of goods during
transit).
Specifically, FCA, CPT, CIP, FAS, FOB, CFR and CIF Incoterms have been amended to
provide that the seller in the middle of a string sale has an obligation to procure goods shipped and not to
ship the goods.
The sellers obligation to contract for the carriage of goods has been amended to allow the seller to procure
a contract of carriage.
Similarities of incoterms 2010 and those of incoterms 2000 include the following;
Application of Incoterms
As with the previous versions of Incoterms, if parties wish the Incoterms 2010 to apply to their sale contract,
they should expressly provide for this in the contract. Incoterms 2010 rather than just Incoterms should
be referred to in the sale contract if it is the intention to incorporate the latest version, so as to avoid any
subsequent dispute as to which set of Rules applies. If the
parties wish to incorporate a specific Rule from Incoterms 2000, or all of Incoterms 2000, again they should
make specific reference to this in the contractual document.
FAS
The provisions of FAS are largely identical to FOB, with the exception that goods are delivered, and risk
passes, once the goods are placed alongside the vessel, as opposed to when they are placed on-board the
vessel. You may wish to expressly provide for what exactly constitutes the goods being "alongside" the
vessel.
CFR
Similarly, the provisions of CFR are largely identical to CIF, with the exception that the seller is not obliged to
procure insurance.
In sum, for the most part, the Incoterms have not changed significantly from 2000 to 2010. As always,
however, care should be taken by sellers and buyers to understand the Incoterms with some specificity. The
purpose of Incoterms, after all, is to establish a common basis of understanding of the rights and obligations
between sellers and buyers throughout the world.
To the extent confusion arises in practice, the usefulness of the Incoterms is eroded. A prime example of this
arises in the common use of the term FOB. Literally, the term means free
on board a carrier. This means that the goods are actually loaded on board a vessel, usually by the seller. In
the case of containerized cargo, however, sellers frequently give the goods to the carrier before the
Guide to the Incoterms 2010 Rules 2011 Updates
*Incoterms
Page 9 of 13
container is loaded on board the vessel. In such cases, FOB is not the correct term to use. The FCA (Free
Carrier) Incoterm should be used in its place. The distinction can be very important in cases where the
goods are damaged because the sellers risk of loss passes at different points depending upon which term is
used. For similar reasons, parties to a contract of sale should be careful in their use of additional phrases
attached to the Incoterms. When such additional phrases are used, they should be carefully defined.
Introduction
The eighth edition of Incoterms was published on 27th September 2010 and came into force on 1st January
2011. The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) reviews and amends these terms roughly once a
decade to ensure that they are kept up to date with changes in international trade developments. Although
there has been no radical departure from the previous edition, Incoterms 2000, the changes seek to
accommodate the growing complexities of changes in trade practice over the last decade. It is evident that
the main objective in developing Incoterms 2010 was to make the terms easier for all to understand and to
promote their applicability globally. Incoterms operate as voluntary internationally recognised standard rules
and definitions which allow traders to speak the same language. The suitable term chosen reflects the
agreed contractual obligations relating to the delivery of the goods which is already contained in the
international contract of sale. The delivery term abbreviation inserted into the contract of sale assists
parties in easily understanding what their responsibilities and risks are at different points during transit of
the goods. Incoterms also elucidate who should be responsible for arranging the various required tasks, such
as insurance, costs and import/export clearance.
Incoterms 2010 has now introduced detailed guidance notes for each rule which provide useful background for
explaining which rule is most suitable for particular goods and means of transport. For example, the 2010 edition
now advises that container shipments use the sale terms FCA where FOB was previously used and CPT or CIP
for CIF, CFR. This is because FOB, CIF, CFR and FAS are not suitable for container shipments due to the
practicalities and complexities of container handling (see definitions below).
The most important changes to be aware of are listed below;
The expansion of the European Union in Europe and trade blocs has meant that the EU has virtually eliminated
borders for the purpose of customs and import/export. This change means that the use of Incoterms 2000 has
become less suitable for trade within the EU. Incoterms 2010 now recognises these changes by stating in a
number of rules that export and import formalities will only have to be complied with where necessary.
Page 10 of 13
abolished and replaced with the introduction of just two new terms DAP (Delivered at Place) which replaces
all four terms, and DAT (Delivered at Terminal) which replaces DEQ (Delivered Ex Quay).
The ICC created the new term DAT as it is more applicable for use in the multi-modal trades. DAT means that the
seller has effectively delivered the goods once they have been unloaded from the arriving mode of transport and
placed at the buyers disposal at the named terminal at the named port or place of destination. Therefore the
sellers obligation is solely to clear the goods for export where applicable, not import. The seller still retains all
elements of risk in the movement of goods until they are delivered and therefore must enter into a contract of
carriage. This clarifies the issue of risk when the container has been loaded into a container stack awaiting
shipment at the named terminal but not at the quayside, which was not previously clearly covered by any term.
DAF, DES and DDU were all similar in scope, which often created confusion about the appropriate D term to
use. Therefore, the ICC considered that the one term DAP would be sufficient and refers to any mode of transport
as well as allowing the delivery place in which the seller would be exposed to any risk to also be a named port.
The sellers liability is the same as in DAT except that the buyer is responsible for the unloading of the goods
from the arriving vehicle, whatever that may be.
Also, in contrast to the previous four classes: E = Departure; F = Main Carriage Unpaid; C = Main Carriage
Paid, and D = Arrival, Incoterms 2010 will now be separated into two groups categorised as either suitable
for sea and inland waterway transport, or suitable for any mode of transport. Therefore there are now
eleven, not thirteen, terms to choose from. The definitions below illustrate the structure of the new
Incoterms;
EXW - Ex Works
FCA - Free Carrier
Changes made to the maritime terms FOB, CIF, CFR and FAS
Incoterms 2010 now allows for the seller to arrange for the contract of carriage under an FOB contract in
trades where it may be commercial practice for the seller to arrange carriage, something which was not
previously provided for.As already previously mentioned Incoterms 2010 provides clarity to the important
definition of the critical point of delivery when transfer of risk from the seller to the buyer takes place. The
accepted understanding that risk passes once goods have passed the imaginary line of the ships rail in
FOB, CFR and CIF has now been replaced with the simple rule that risk passes when the goods are on board
the vessel. This occurs when the whole consignment has been loaded on board the vessel. This is to be
Page 11 of 13
welcomed as it will avoid any potential costly disputes regarding the exact point in which the goods pass the
ship's rail, rendering the concept of goods hanging on a ships hook crossing the ships rails out-dated.
Insurance requirements
Where an Incoterm rule requires a party to obtain insurance, as in CIP and CIF, Incoterms 2010 requires that
the cargo insurance obtained must comply at least with the minimum cover provided by Clauses (C) of the
Institute Cargo Clauses to reflect the recent 2009 updates.Heightened security requirements cross-borders
Incoterms 2010 now provide specific obligations for the parties to either supply each other with information or to
provide assistance in obtaining necessary security related import/export and transport documentation, such as
chain of custody information, for approvals and clearance. This is because many countries now require
heightened security checks for the transportation of cargo whereas this level of co-operation was not previously
required.
Sellers are now able to procure the goods under the new Incoterms
Incoterms 2010 now allows for a seller to have the obligation to procure goods shipped which is in line with
existing commercial practice. Previously Incoterms 2000 meant that the seller had, theoretically, to ship the
goods even though the sellers in the middle of the chain do not ship the goods as they are already in transit. This
recognises that in some instances goods are on-sold several times, but it may be the initial seller who contracted
for the carriage of the goods to the buyer at the end of the chain. This should allow for the Incoterms rules to be
more attractive to commodity traders.
General comments
Although the changes in the usual maritime transport terms of FOB, CIF, FAS and CFR in Incoterms 2010 are
subtle, it is important for ship owners and charterers alike to understand all of the above-mentioned changes due
to the global growth of parties entering into multi-modal transport contracts of sale. Incoterms 2010 is a positive
move forward which provides clarity in the operation of containerisation, both domestically and cross-borders.
Changes in phraseology now applied in Incoterms 2010 accommodate for recent and potential future
developments in trade, individual agreements reached between parties, customary practices used and the growing
use of e-communication.
Page 12 of 13
It must be remembered that for Incoterms 2010 to apply they have to be included into sale contracts expressly.
Standardised sale contracts need to be amended. In addition, contracts made under Incoterms 2000 remain valid
even after 2011 and, therefore, will need to be amended if parties intend the 2010 Incoterms to apply. It is also
important to remember that parties must state in their contract of sale not just the Incoterms which they wish to
apply to their specific contract, but which relevant version.
Page 13 of 13