Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
BY BARBARA M McGUINNESS
Traditionally, employee loyalty was taken for granted. It was assumed that when
employees joined an organization, they intend to stay, grow and mature in that organization.
Loyalty meant the company would always provide regular pay raises, recognition and other
tangible and intangible benefits. Loyalty was earned and was a two-way street; the company
rewarded employees with security and, in turn, employees did the best job they could for their
employer. Today, employee loyalty cannot be taken for granted.
The old employment contract
As we moved into the second half of the 20th century, businesses were stable and the
economy was growing. Corporations began taking on human characteristics; "family" was used
to describe the company's relationship to its employees. Employees were given a variety of
benefits. The organization considered its workforce permanent and personnel programs and
practices were geared to ward full-time employees.
Because of the shift toward outpatient care, decreasing inpatient census and managed
care, hospitals are cutting and streamlining services to remain competitive. For staff nurses as
well as nurse managers, this means no one is safe. The old employment contract is now null
and void.
Career development is second only to job security in helping foster commitment. Since
job security cannot be guaranteed, employers must offer career development to their
employees. While it is true that employees are personally responsible for their own career
development, forward-thinking companies offer career enrichment programs that help
employees, including senior management, identify and develop their marketable skills. Crosstraining in different clinical and nonclinical areas (e.g., managed care, staff development) and
clinical ladders all provide an opportunity for professional growth.
Pay for productivity and flexible benefits include merit-based wage increases,
promotion based on performance and clinical ladders. According to Rhodes, "When pay is not
linked to performance, it can become a source of dissatisfaction and can damage employee
commitment to the organization. Although it is too early to tell if use of alternative rewards
(e.g., broad-based or productivity-based incentives) will have a long-lasting impact on
employee loyalty and com-mitment, companies are likely to make a more thoughtful linkage
between employee pay and performance in order to foster greater commitment." For
example, some hospitals offer job-sharing options, flex time for working mothers and on-site
day care for children and elders with costs adjusted to an employee's salary. By offering these
benefits, nurse managers, together with human resources professionals, can make a positive
change in their employees as well as their organizations.
Together, organizations and nurse managers can increase employee loyalty while
remaining competitive and profitable. People want to be loyal, but they need a reason.
REFERENCES
1.
Patch, E, D. Rice and C. Dreilinger, "A Contract for Commitment," Training and
Development. 1992, 46:11:47-51.
2.
Cumming, C.M., "Team Players vs. Hired Guns: Leveraging a Competitive Advantage,"
Compensation and Benefits Management, 1992, 8:4:28-33.
3.
Zinober, .J.W., "The Loyalty Crisis and the American Work Force," Medical Group
ManagementJournal, 1992, 39:5:66-74.
4.
McKendall, M. and S. Margulis, "People and Their Organizations: Rethinking the
Assumptions," Business Horizons, 1995, 38:6:21-27.
5.
6.
Rhodes, D.W., "Employee Loyalty is an Attainable Goal," The Journal of Business
Strategy, 1989, 10:6:52.
7.
Byron, W.J., "Coming to Terms with the New Corporate Contract,' Business Horizons,
1995, 38:1:15.
8.
9.
Brewer, loc.cit.