Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 10

UDPRP Review Summary 05.22.

15
Urban Design Peer Review Panel

Applicable Urban Design Priorities that Project Should Achieve


05.22.15

TIME: recommendations
8:30am
UDPRP
from both the May 22, 2015 peer review meetings listed below:
City
of Dallas Alamo Manhattan_Bishop Arts Gateway
PROJECT:

UDPRP
Review
Summary 05.22.15
City
of Dallas Dallas
LOCATION:
City Hall Room 5ES
Urban Design Peer Review Panel
UDPRP Review Summary 05.22.15
Urban
Peer Review Panel
DATE:Design 05.22.15

Overview

Below is a summary of Urban Design Peer Review Panel advice for Bishop Arts Gateway as
DATE:
TIME: from 05.22.15
8:30am
derived
the May 22nd Peer Review session.
TIME:
8:30amManhattan_Bishop Arts Gateway
PROJECT: Alamo

Advice Summary

elsbeth
7th

davis

zan

[3] The panel recommends minimizing the variations in sidewalk elevation along 7th street,
Advice
Summary
[1] resolving
Consider
adjusting
individual
building
masses
to help
mitigate envelope
the proposed
development
a portion of
the changes
in grade
inside
the building
rather
than in the
scale
better integrate into the existing neighborhood character, particularly along the
publicand
realm.
[1] Consider
adjusting
western portions
of individual
the projectbuilding
site. masses to help mitigate the proposed development
scale
and
better
integrate
into
the
neighborhood
particularly
along thethe
[4] Carefully consider the allocation ofexisting
space in
the proposedcharacter,
7th street section,
particularly
western
portions
of
the
project
site.
[2] travel
Explore
modifying
the
proposed
program
to
allow
for
the
flexibility
to
employ
architectural
lanes, in an effort to highlight its pedestrian nature.
responses that help unite the project with the surrounding context.
[2] The
Explore
modifying
the proposed
to allow
for the decision
flexibility making
to employ
architectural
[5]
panel
recommends
the City program
engage the
appropriate
bodies
to ensure a
responses
that
help
unite
the
project
with
the
surrounding
context.
level of
integration of
the streetthe
carvariations
stop into the
overall pedestrian
realm.7th street,
[3] high
The panel
recommends
minimizing
in sidewalk
elevation along
resolving a portion of the changes in grade inside the building envelope rather than
in the
[3] The
minimizing
variations
in sidewalk
along
7th street,
[6]
panel
recommends that
the Citythe
develops
a strategy
that elevation
looks at the
larger
public
realm.
resolving a portion
of the changes
in grade
inside the
envelope
rather
than in the
neighborhood
in anticipation
of future
development
to building
proactively
address
foreseeable
issues
th
public
realm.
integrating
higher
density
development
into
the
existing 7neighborhood.
[4] of
Carefully
consider
the
allocation
of space in
the
proposed
street section, particularly the
travel lanes, in an effort to highlight its pedestrian nature.
[4] Carefully consider the allocation of space in the proposed 7th street section, particularly the
travelpanel
lanes,
in an effort to
its pedestrian
nature.decision making bodies to ensure a
[5] The
recommends
thehighlight
City engage
the appropriate
high level of integration of the street car stop into the overall pedestrian realm.
[5] The panel recommends the City engage the appropriate decision making bodies to ensure a
level of
integration of
thethe
street
stop into
the overall
realm.
[6] high
The panel
recommends
that
Citycar
develops
a strategy
thatpedestrian
looks at the
larger
neighborhood in anticipation of future development to proactively address foreseeable issues
[6] The
panel recommends
that development
the City develops
a strategy
looks at the larger
of integrating
higher density
into the
existingthat
neighborhood.
neighborhood in anticipation of future development to proactively address foreseeable issues
of integrating higher density development into the existing neighborhood.

madison

PROJECT:
Manhattan_Bishop
LOCATION: Alamo
Dallas City
Hall Room 5ES Arts Gateway
[1] Consider adjusting individual building masses to help mitigate the proposed development
scale andDallas
betterCity
integrate
into the
existing neighborhood character, particularly along the
LOCATION:
Hall Room
5ES
western
portions
of
the
project
site.
Overview
Below is a summary of Urban Design Peer Review Panel advice for Bishop Arts Gateway as
Overview
derived
frommodifying
the May 22nd
Peer Review
session.
[2] Explore
the proposed
program
to allow for the flexibility to employ architectural
Below
is a summary
of unite
Urban
Review
Panel advice
for Bishop Arts Gateway as
responses
that help
theDesign
projectPeer
with the
surrounding
context.
derived
from
the
May
22nd
Peer
Review
session.
Advice Summary

beckley

oak cliff street car extension

DATE:

Policy References

Context Description

Alamo Manhattan_Bishop Arts

Forward Dallas!
Section 5 [urban design element]

Revised from the proposal previously evaluated by the UDPRP, the project scope has been
reduced to include only the two northernmost development sites. The site remains on the corner
of Zang and Davis, bisected by Davis Street. The program for the project consists of mixed use
retail and residential.

Neighborhood:
Bishop Arts District

dallas citydesign studio

TIF Urban Design Guidelines


Part III, Part IV [Oak Cliff Gateway]

Page 1 of 1

dallas citydesign studio

Page 1 of 1

dallas citydesign studio

Page 1 of 1

Alamo Manhattan_Bishop Arts

As a response to the original peer review panel advice, the project team is presenting an revised
project responding to previous peer review advice and community input. The current proposal
consists of a reduced project scope, reduction of building mass and scale, and articulation of
upper and lower building levels in response to the surrounding neighborhood context.

Program:
Retail / Residential

Urban Design Peer Review

09.25.2015

Centres d'intérêt liés