Kuwait University
College of Engineering & Petroleum
Mechanical Engineering Department
Lab C1
ME-474
Experiment #1
Free and Forced Vibration with Damping for a 1-DOF System
Conducted On: September 7, 2015
By
Asilah Alshatti 209117171
Salma Al-Fahhad 2111113048
Taiba Al-Baloul 210111776
September 28, 2015
On my honor, I pledge that this work of mine does not violate the University provisions
on academic misconduct. By signing below, I certify that I understand the University
Policies on academic misconduct and that when an act of academic misconduct is
committed, all parties involved are in violation.
SignatureAbstract
Free undamped and damped vibration:
This experiment was conducted in order to study undamped free
vibration, damped vibration, and forced vibration. For the purpose of
studying the undamped free vibration, a setup with no damping current
was used. For different masses, the motion of the vibrating mass was
recorded on a strip of teledeltos paper. Afterwards, the natural
frequencies corresponding to the masses were calculated, and the
squared values of the natural frequencies were plotted against the
reciprocal of the masses. The slope of the graph represents the value
of the experimental spring constant, which equals (54.19 N/m). This
value was compared to the theoretical value of the spring constant,
which equals (54 N/m). [erronbstWeen theltheorsticalivalUetsnal thie
experimental value of the spring constant was found tobe (
In order to study the damped vibration, the same setup was used
with an electromagnet to provide a damping current. For different
damping currents, the damping ratios were calculated, and then
plotted against the damping current. In addition, the values of the
damping coefficients were calculated, and then plotted against the
damping currents. It was concluded that the increase in the mass
results in a decrease in the damping ratios, but provides a higher
damping coefficient
Forced vibration:
In order to study the forced vibration, a motor was used to oscillate
the setup-base, that resulted in a forced vibration of the mass which is
called an oscillation motion. The purpose of the experiment was to get
the theoretical and the experimental values of the transmissibility ratio.
The theoretical and the experimental transmissibility ratios were then
plotted against the frequency ratio. After that, the half-power-point
method was used in order to plot the transmissibility ratio against thefrequency ratio for the case of applying a damping current of (0-74)
to the system. The damping ratio corresponding to this damping
FSRIOWESTTOUPGIESIDETEGUAIIEONN).t was concluded that the increase in
the damping current results in a decrease in the transmissibility ratio.
In addition, it was found that the theoretical values of the
transmissibility ratios were greater than the experimental values.Table of Contents
Abstract.
Table of Contents
List of Figures and Tables.
Introduction:
Tabulated Data:
ii
iti
14Figure
Y
Table 1
Table 2:
kg)
Table 3:
kg)
Table 4
Table 5
Table 6
Table 7:
Table 8
Table 9:
kg)
Table 1
kg)
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
List of Figures and Tab]
1: The experimental setup for 1-DOF. MW
Measured data resulting from the variation of time period with vibrating mass...1
Measured data of the variation of damping ratio with damping current (m=1.35
1
Measured data of the variation of damping ratio with damping current (m=4.85
Measured data of the damping ratio for a value of damping current ([=0.7 A).....1
Measured data of the damping ratio for a value of damping current ([=0.9 A).....1
Measured data of the damping ratio for a value of damping current (I=1.1 A).....1
Measured data of the damping ratio for a value of damping current (I=1.3 A).....1
Calculated data of the variation of time period with vibrating mass. 1
Calculated data of the variation of damping ratio with damping current (
0: Calculated data of the variation of damping ratio with damping current (m=4.85
1
1: Calculated data of the damping ratio for a value of damping current (I=0.7 A)..1
2: Calculated data of the damping ratio for a value of damping current ([=0.9 A)..1
3: Calculated data of the damping ratio for a value of damping current ([=1.1 A)..1
Table 14: Calculated data of the damping ratio for a value of damping current (I=1.3 A)..1
Nomenclature
AB constants determined by initial conditions
c damping coefficient.
F® extemal impressed time dependent force
k spring stiffness.
m vibrating mass
r frequency ratio.
t time
a natural frequency of the system.
44 damped natural frequency of the system
x displacement in x-direction at time t.
y displacement of the support in x-direction at time t
K velocity inx - direction at time t
k acceleration inx -direction at time t
x steady state amplitude of forced vibration in x-direction
amplitude ratio (Amplifca tion Factor or Transmissi bilty)
ss
amplitude of frame oscillation in x-direction.
aa ratio of successive maxima
x
al
ratio of successive maxima to minima
damping ratio
Introduction:
Vibration dampers are used in many application where dissipation of energy is
required, Mostly, mechanical energy is converted into heat. When the dissipation is due to
intemal friction or hysteresis characteristics of to the molecular structure, it is called
material damping When the dissipation is generated by friction, snapping, rubbing,
slapping or impacting at the joints and interfaces of structural assemblies, it is called
structural damping Dampers are used for increasing life, reducing noise, and preventing
premature failures. Dampers have become more popular recently for vibration control of
structures, because of their safe, effective and economical design. In addition, anotherapplication is in cars where the damper protects components from premature wear,
therefore increasing life. It also isolates vibration and oscillation noise so that it is not
transmitted to the vehicle structure. Many other uses of dampers exist in the industry
where machinery is involved. Vibration is divided into
(1) Free Vibration:
The free vibration results from an initial impact energy that is changes continually
from potential energy to kinetic energy. Ifa mechanical system was displaced by an initial
impact energy from its equilibrium position and then released, the restoring force will
retum the system towards its equilibrium position. This initial impact energy can be an
initial velocity, or an initial displacement through an applied force. In this type of
vibration, the system vibrates at its natural frequency. However, due to various reasons,
some mechanical energy will be dissipated during each cycle of vibration, and this effect
is called damping
In the first part of the experiment, the system is allowed to vibrate freely, without
damping, in order to study the effect of varying the mass on the natural frequency. In the
second part of the experiment, the mass is fixed while the current damping is increased in
order to study its effect on the system, After that, the readings are collected and used to
determine the damping coefficient
‘The logarithmic decrement is the natural log of the ratio of the amplitudes of any two
successive peaks. This method states that the displacement of an underdamped system is a
sinusoidal oscillation with decaying amplitude. This method method is used in order to
find the damping ratio of the system.
(2) Forced Vibration:
When an extemal excitation input is added to the system, the resulting vibration is
called forced vibration. In the third part of the experiment, the setup-base is oscillated
using a motor that oscillates at a set angular speed in order to cause an oscillation
motion. In this case, the transmissibility ratio (X/Y), which is the ratio of
the amplitude of the response X to that of the base Y, is obtained.
To estimate the damping ratio from the frequency domain, the half-power bandwidth
method is used. The halfpower point damping method is defined as the ratio of the
frequency range between the two half power points to the natural frequency at this modeIn this method, the amplitude of the frequency response function of the system is obtained
first. Corresponding to each natural frequency, there is a peak in the amplitude of the
frequency response function. The half-power points are the frequencies at which the value
of response amplitude drops 3 decibels, or 70.7%, in relation to the amplitude of the
response at the center. The more the damping, the more the frequency range between
these two pointsObjectives
The objectives of this experiment were
1) To investigate the variation of the undamped natural frequency with the vibrating
mass
2) To study damped free vibration and to determine the damping ratio
3) To study the forced vibration excited by an oscillating supportTheoretical Background
Mathematical Model
In an ideal, 1-DOF system a rigid mass, m, is connected to a fixed, rigid support by @
light spring of stiffness k and a viscous damper with damping coefficient c, and is
constrained to move in the x-direction only. An extemal force F(t) acts on the mass.
The resulting equation of motion of the system is
maxtextkx=F() an
Case 1: Free Vibra’
mxrextkx=0 aay
Ifa system, after an initial disturbance, is left to vibrate on its own, the ensuing vibration
is known as free vibration. When all extemelly applied forces F(t) are zero Equation 1.1
becomes
maxtkx=0 a3)
In the case of un-damped free vibration,
a4)
with a circular frequency,
where , Oy is the natural frequency of the system and Equation 1.4 is a second order
homogeneous, linear differential equation. It has a solution of the form x= Asin @ , or
x= Acos Oyt Introducing the damping ratio
(14a)x=e(Acos(a, J1—27 t+ Bsin((@, y) a6)
x+ 260, 1+ @,”. (5)
‘The Equation 1.2 becomes:
rae (A+ Bt) an
‘The solution of Equation 1.5 depends on the value of thus
for <1
for =1
and for >1
*{Acosh(@, JE? —1)t + Bsinh(( w, fE? —1)t} (18)
where A and B are constants determined by the initial conditions. Ifx= Xq and
for <1
cos(0, fi )t + anl(o, fI-F) as)
i-
(1.10)
and for >1
cost a, (Et + Pon =D) aan
V
Note that for <1 the free motion is oscillatory with damped natural frequency
oy = (1 12)
and the ratio of successive maxima for 1
Yan =“ OXq expl (Ee, (sm > J aay
Case 2: Forced rations
x4 26, 1+. 0,°'x=260,Y cos wt+,Ysin wt (1s)
If the support is oscillated such that its motion in the x-direction is y = Y sin t the
equation of motion for the system becomes
‘The steady-state solution of Equation 1.18 is
X_ fd+4er)
2. (ig)
Fo fa-P P4877]
x=Xcos(o t+6)
where the amplitude of the forced vibration, X, is given by the
amplification factor:
M1where,
(1.20)
Experimental Deta set up and procedure
Experimental set up:
1) Vibrating Mass: Constrained in an extemelly pressurized air bearing guide (2)
2) Air-Bearing Guide
3) Frame.
4) Springs
5) Copper Plate: It moves in the air gap of an electromagnet (6) attached to the frame
6) Electromagnet: It gives eddy current damping.
7) Stylus: Itis fixed to the mass and records its motion on a strip of teledeltos paper.
8) Teledeltos Paper.
9) Paper Drive.
10) Base Plate.
11) Driving Motor.
12) Gear Box: Its 1 : 20 speed reduction gear. Correct your RPM accordingly.
13) Eccentric: For providing oscillations to the frame (3)
14) Air Pressure Regulator and Filter: For air bearing
15) Out-of Balance Force: It may be fitted to the vibrating mass to force the system via
motor.
16) Control Unit.
Figure 1: The experimental setup for 1-DOFExperimental procedure:
Part 1: Variation of undamped natural frequency with vibrating
mass:
1) Prepare the setup for free un-damped vibrations by setting the eccentric to zero radius
and zero damping current, Adjust the air bearing pressure so that the mass floats. Set
up the recorder and time it for mm/sec of paper speed
2) Fora given value of vibrating mass make three measurements of the time taken for 10
n cycles of free vibration, where n is chosen to give atime of between 35 and 50
seconds. From the average time for one cycle, Tx the un-damped natural frequency,
@, can be computed from = 2/Ta,
3) Repeat for different values of the vibrating mass, m, chosen to give approximately
equal intervals for 1/m.
4) Plot a graph of ay? against m™! which should be a straight line with slope equal to.
the spring stiffness, k. Be consistent in units (if the unit of mis kg and Tnis sec, then
the unit of Onis rad/sec and of k is N/m)
Part 2: Damped free vibration and determination of the
damping ratio
1) Set a given value of the damping current and hold it constant
throughout the test. Remember the safety precaution.
2) Measurement of the damping ratio,, is from a record of the free
vibration in which the vibration mass is displaced to one of the stops
limiting its motion and released from rest. The equilibrium position
of the mass should be recorded before and after the free vibration
and the initial position of the mass (x = Xg) should be recorded
before the mass is released.
3) For < 0,05: determine the mean value of the ratio of successive
maxima, and calculate the value of from Equation 1.13.
4) For 0.05<=<0.1: determine the mean value of the ratio of
successive maxima and obtain the value of
5) For 0.1<= ,0.3: determine the mean value of the ratio of successive
maxima and minima and obtain the value of
136) For 0.3<= <0.6: determine the ratio of the amplitude of the first
XIX E
minimum to the initial displacement 2 ° and obtain
7) Plot a graph of against damping current to use as a calibration
curve to guide in setting in other experiments. Note that the graph
will apply for particular values of m and k, but it can be adjusted for
other values using V1.4a
Part
Forced vibration excited by oscillating the support
1) Using the results of Part 2, set the damping current to give the required value of and
hold it constant throughout the test.
2) Set the eccentric to give a suitable amplitude of frame oscillation, Y, and measure it
using a ruler. If ¥ is made too large with low values of the motion of the vibrating
mass will be limited by the stops for that part of the forced vibration response in the
region of resonance
3) Switch on the frame drive (selector D in Figure (1))
4) Select the appropriate forcing frequency by controlling knob C of Figure (1). Count
the RPS using the photoelectric probe assembly
5) Set up the recorder as before to record several cycles of steady-state forced vibration
for values of the forcing frequency, @, from approximately 05a, to 2.5%, with close
spacing of the readings in the region of resonance.
6) Measure the amplitude of vibration of the vibrating mass, X, from the recorded traces
and plot X/Y against /o, Compare this graph with the theoretical response given
by Equation 1.19, evaluated for the appropriate value of
Tabulated Data:
14Measured:
(A) Free Vibration
Table (1) below displays the data obtained for a free, undamped vibration of a single
degree of freedom system. The first column represents the serial number of the runs,
while the second column represents the mass of the cradle in (kg). The third column lists
the reciprocal of the mass in (kg), while the fourth column lists the number of cycles
taken for each run. The fifth column displays the length of the record in (mm).The sixth
column represents the average time period in (sec)
‘Table 1: Measured data from the variation of the time peried with vibrating mass.
Seria | Mass | 1/m No. of Length of the Average
1 | Im, | kg | cycles Record r
No. | kgl y In] [L, mm] Period
Z [sec]
1 1.35 0.74 2 94.5 1.00
2 1.85 0.54 2 lil 1.17
3 2.35 0.43 15 94.5 1.33
4 2.85 0.35 1 70 1.48
5 3.35 0.30 15 114 1.61
6 3.85 0.26 15 121.5 71
7 4.35 0.23 1 86 1.82
8 4.85, 0.21 15 136 1.92
Tables (2) and (3) below displays the data obtained for an undamped vibration of a
single degree of freedom system. The mass is fixed at (1.35 kg) in table (2) and at (4.85
cg) in table (3). The first column represents the serial number of the runs taken, while the
second column represents the damping current in (A). The third column lists the
amplitude of vibration in (mm) for the first maximum or minimum amplitude, while
columns four and five list the second and third maximum or minimum amplitude of
vibration in (mm), respectively.
Serial % Xe Xaes
15No. IL Al [mm] {mm] from)
1 0.0 215 20.0 19.0
2 O.1 20.5 19.0 18.5
3 0.2 19.5 18.5 18.0
4 0.3 19.5 17.0 175
5 0.4 19.0 15.0 17.0
6 05) 18.0 14.0 15.0
1 0.6 17.0 12.0 14.0
8 O7 16.5) 10.5) 13.0
9 08 16.5) 10.0 12.0
10 og 14.5) 8.0 10.0
nL 1.0 14.0 6.0 85
12 li 13.0 45) 75
13 12 12.0 4.0 65
4 13 11.0 3.0 5.0
Table 3: Measured data of the variation of damping ratio with damping
current (m=4.85 kg).
Serial Damping Current Xe Xoo Xnro5
No. 1, Al [mm] [mm] [mm]
1 0.0 24.0 20.0 23.0
2 0.1 23.5 19.0 215
3 0.2 22.5 18.0 20.5
4 03 215 17.0 18.5)
5 0.4 21.0 16.0 17.0
6 05) 19.0 14.0 15.0
7 0.6 175 125 125
8 07 17.0 10.5 10.0
9 0.8 145) 9.0 8.0
10 0g 13.0 7.0 6.0
1 1.0 11.0 55) 45)
12 11 9.0) 45) 3.0)
13 12 8.0 35) 25)
14 13 65 3.0 1.0
(B) Forced Vibration
Tables (4), (5), (6), and (7) display the data obtained for a damped, forced vibration of
a single degree of freedom system. The damping current is fixed to (0.7 A) in table (4), to
(0.9 A) in table (5), to (1.1 A) in table (6), and to (1.3 A) in table (7). The mass is fixed at
(3.35 kg) for tables (4) through (7). The first column represents the serial number of runs
taken, while the second column represents the desired frequency ratio. The third column
16lists the desired motor speed in (cpm), while the fourth column lists the actual motor
speed in (rpm). The fifth column displays the doubled amplitude of vibration in (mm)
while the sixth column displays the amplitude of vibration is listed in (mm)
‘Table 4: Measured data of the damping ratio for a value of damping current (10.7 A).
Seri Desired Desired Motor | Actual Motor 2x x
al_| Frequency Ratio Speed Speed Im | Imm
No. | [rl In, rpm] In, rpm] ml |
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 |
10
il
12
13
‘Table 5: Measured data of the damping ratio for a value of damping current (0.9 A).
Seri | Desired Desired Motor | Actual Motor | 2x | x
al | Frequency Ratio Speed Speed Im | [mm
No. tr In, rpm] Ln, rpm] ml | J
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
710
11
12 |
13 |
‘Table 6: Measured data of the damping ratio for a value of damping current
1A).
Desired
Frequency Ratio
tr
Seri
al
No.
Actual Motor
Speed
In, rpm]
Desired Motor
Speed
In, rpm]
‘Table 7: Measured data of the damp:
Desired
Frequency Ratio
tr
Seri |
al
No.
ing ratio for a value of damping current (I=1.3 A).
‘Actual Motor
Speed
In, rpm]
Desired Motor |
Speed
In, rpm]
2x
Im
ml
1813
Calculated:
(A) Free Vibration
Table (8) below displays the data obtained for a free, undamped vibration of a single
degree of freedom system. The first column represents the serial number of the runs,
while the second column represents the mass of the cradle in (kg). The third column lists
the reciprocal of the mass in (kg”), while the fourth column lists the number of cycles
taken for each run. The fifth column displays the length of the record in (mm).The sixth
column represents the average time period in (sec), The seventh column shows the square
of the natural frequency of the system in (rad/s?)
‘Table 8: Calculated data of the variation of time period with vibrating mass.
ser|™25| 17m | No.of | Length of | average Freely
ial | tm, | (kg | Cycles the Record | Time Period Tw,
No. | igi | 2 | inl [L, mm] U7, sec] rade]
1 [1.35 /0.74[ 2.00 94.50 1.00 39.60
2 |185[054[ 2.00 | 111.00 117 28.70
3 |235|043] 150 94.50 1.33 22.27
4 [285 [035] 1.00 70.00 1.48 18.04
5 [335/030] 150 114.00 161 15.30
6 | 385 [026] 150 121.50 171 13.47
7 [435 | 023, 1.00 86.00 1.82 11.95
8 [45 [021] 150 136.00 1.92 10.75
Tables (9) and (10) displays the data obtained for an undamped vibration of a single
degree of freedom system. The mass is fixed at (1.35 kg) in table (2) and at (4.85 kg) in
table (3). The first column represents the serial number of the runs taken, while the
second column represents the damping current in (A). The third column lists the
19amplitude of vibration in (mm) for the first maximum or minimum amplitude, while
columns four and five list the second and third maximum or minimum amplitude of
vibration in (mm), respectively The sixth and seventh columns list the logarithmic
decrement for su
essive maxima and successive maxima to minima, respectively. The
eighth column represents the damping ratio of the system, while the ninth column lists the
damping coefficient of the system in (N-s/m)
‘Table 9: Calculated data of the variation of damping ratio with damping current (m=1.35 kz).
| Damping
Serial Xe | Xen | Xnsos Damping | Coefficie
No. | Current | [mm] | [mm] | [mm]
Ul, Al (1 Ic, N-
1» sim]
1 0.00 | 21.50 | 20.00 | 19.00 | 1.08 0.07 0.01
2 0.10 | 20.50 | 19.00 | 1850 | 1.08 0.08 0.01
3 020 | 19.50 | 1850 | 18.00 | 1.05 0.05 0.01
4 030 | 19.50 [17.00 [1750] 1.15 0.14 0.02
5 0.40 | 19.00 | 15.00 | 17.00 | 1.27 0.24 0.04
6 050 | 18.00 [14.00 | 15.00 | 1.29 0.25 0.04
7 0.60_| 17.00 | 12.00 | 14.00 | 1.42 0.35 0.06
8 0.70 | 1650 | 10.50 [13.00 | 157 0.45 0.07
9 0.80 | 1650 | 10.00 | 12.00 | 1.65 050 0.08
10 oso | 1450 | 8.00 | 1000] 181 059 0.09
i 100 | 14.00 | 600 | 850 | 2.33 0.85 0.13
12 110 | 13.00 | 450 | 750 | 2.89 1.06 0.17
13 120 | 12.00 | 400 | 650 | 3.00 1.10 0.17
14 130 [11.00 [3.00 [5.00 | 367 130 0.20‘Table 10: Calculated data of the variation of damping ratio with damping current (m=4.85 kg).
Dampin
serial pon Damping | coefficie
erial |g xX | Xe | Xns0s amen a
No. | Current | tmmI | [mm] | [mm] Xe a IdNe
tal mt
5 sim]
1 0.00 24.00 20.00 | 23.00 1.20 0.18 0.03
2 0.10 23.50 19.00 | 21.50 1.24 0.21 0.03
3 0.20 22.50 18.00 | 20.50 1.25 0.22 0.04
4 0.30 21.50 17.00 | 18.50 1.26 0.23 0.04
5 0.40 21.00 16.00 | 17.00 1.31 0.27 0.04
6 0.50 19.00 14.00 | 15.00 1.36 0.31 0.05
7 0.60 17.50 12.50 | 12.50 1.40 0.34 0.05
8 0.70 17.00 10.50 | 10.00 1.62 0.48 0.08
9 0.80 14.50 9.00 8.00 1.61 0.48 0.08
10 0.90 13.00 7.00 6.00 1.86 0.62 0.10
11 1.00 11.00 5.50 4.50 2.00 0.69 0.11
12 1.10 9.00 4.50 3.00 2.00 0.69 0.11
13 1.20 8.00 3.50 2.50 2.29 0.83 0.13
14 1.30 6.50 3.00 1.00 2.17 0.77 0.12
(B) Forced Vibration
Tables (11), (12), (13), (14) list the data obtained for a damped, forced vibration of a
single degree of freedom system, The damping current is fixed to (0.7 A) in table (11), to
(0.9 A) in table (12), to (1.1 A) in table (13), and to (1.3 A) in table (14). The mass is
fixed at (3.35 ke) for tables (11) through (14). The first column represents the serial
number of runs taken, while the second column represents the desired frequency ratio.
The third column displays the desired motor speed in (cpm), while the fourth column
displays the actual motor speed in (rpm). The fifth column lists the doubled amplitude of
vibration in (mm), while the sixth column lists the amplitude of vibration in (mm). The
seventh column shows the actual frequency ratio. The eighth and ninth columns
represents the experimental and theoretical amplitude ratios, respectively. The first row of
the table displays the damping coefficient in (N-s/m) and the damping ratio.
‘Table 11: Calculated data of the damping ratio fora value of damping current (I=0.7 A).
Damping Damping Ratio
Coefficient {@
a[c, N-s/m]
Seria | Desired | Desired | Actual [> Actual]
1? | Frequen Motor | motor | 2%) x | Frequen| 7
No, | &YRatio | Speed | Speed |! | mm] | cy Ratio
{rl [n, rpm] | _[n, rpm] {r
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
iL
12
13
‘able 12: Caleulated data ofthe damping ratio fora value of damping current (1-09 A).
Corie Damping Ratio
[c, N-s/m]
;, | Desired | Desired | Actual Actual
Serla'| Frequen | Motor Motor en x | Frequen 2
No, | &YRatio | Speed | Speed |! | [mm] | cy Ratio
In In, rpm]_|_tn, rpm] In
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
iL
12
13
‘able 13: Calculated data ofthe damping ratio fora value of damping current (1.1 A).
Damping Damping Ratio
Coefficient _| ta[c, N-s/m]
Seria] Desired | Desired | Actual 7 5y Actual | x | x
1 Frequen Motor Motor |imm |, | Frequen | Y aco
No, | CY Ratio | Speed Speed 7" | mm] | cy Ratio
tr In, rpm1_|_tn, rpm] i
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
i
12
13
‘Table 14: Calculated data of the damping ratio fora value of damping current (13 A).
Damping Ratio
(a
Seria | Desired | Desired Actual | x x
1 Frequen | Motor Frequen | y Y avo
No. | CYRatio | Speed cy Ratio
tr In, rpm] tr
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
i
12
13