Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 4

Affidavit

Family Law Rules ~ RULE 15.08

Filed in:
Family Court of Australia Client ID _____________________________
Family Court of Western Australia
Federal Magistrates Court of Australia File number __________________________
Other (specify)
Filed at GOTHAM REGISTRY
Filed on behalf of:
Full name: ADAM ADAMS
Filed on 10 September 2010
MARK X IN THE BOX THAT APPLIES TO YOU
Husband/father Court location GOTHAM CITY____________
Wife/mother
Other Court date __________________________

Name of person swearing/affirming this affidavit (SEE PART C)


ADAM ADAMS
Date of swearing/affirming 10/09/2010

Part A About the parties


APPLICANT 1 RESPONDENT 1
Family name as used now Family name as used now
ADAMS YU
Given names Given names
Adam Hai Kon
APPLICANT 2
RESPONDENT 2
Family name as used now
Family name as used now

Given names Given names

What is the contact address (address for service) in Australia for the party filing this affidavit?
You do not have to give your residential address. You may give another address at which you are satisfied that you will receive
documents. If you give a lawyer’s address, include the name of the law firm.
His Lawyer
1 Capital Boulevard State Capital Hill Postcode 911
Phone Fax*
DX
Lawyer’s code
Email*
* Please do not include email or fax addresses unless you are willing to receive documents from the Court and other parties
in that way.

Part B About the independent children’s lawyer (if appointed)

Independent children’s lawyer family name


Given names
FAMILY LAWYER
Firm name
FAMILY LAW FIRM
1
Part C About you (the deponent)

What is your family name used now? Your given names?


ADAM ADAMS

Usual occupation
Male Female

What is your address?


You do not have to give your residential address. You may give another address at which you are satisfied that you will receive
documents.

C/- His Lawyer, 1 Capital Boulevard Capital City

State Gotham Postcode 911

Part D Evidence

 Set out the facts divided into consecutively numbered paragraphs. Each paragraph should be confined
to a distinct part of the subject matter.
 Attach extra page(s) if you need more space. Make sure that the page containing Part E is always the
last page of the form. You and the witness to your affidavit must sign the bottom of each additional
page.

1. 1.I have suffered hardships and delay in being able to make this appeal because of unexplained delays
by the Court in providing to me copies of transcripts and orders and reasons. After multiple requests,
Federal Magistrate Macbeth's Chambers posted these to me under cover of a letter dated 18/08/2010.
Australia Post handed these to me at about 1.15 pm on 23/8/2010 (barely 3 days ago).

2.I have suffered hardships and delay in being able to make this appeal because of the decisions made by
Federal Justice Macbeth to leave me, the paternal parent, and also to leave my mother, the Australian and
paternal grand parent undischarged from our witnesses oaths and therefore (to the extent as a lay person I
am able to even comprehend the why, how and what of it all), technically still under oath as if under cross
examinations in the witness box. I have suffered hardship from Federal Magistrate Macbeth's decisions to
do this to us, leaving us both remaining under witness oath for an indeterminate period of at least 6 weeks,
and possible twice or four times that long. I am reliant on support from my mother (both financial and
emotional support). My mother is naturally concerned for my welfare, as her eldest son, and for my
daughter's welfare, as her granddaughter. On top of these worries caused by these proceedings my mother
also has to manage the welfare of my seriously ill maternal grandmother and my seriously ill father (the
health circumstances of both have been fully disclosed to the Court and the Magistrate in the materials.
And yet my mother and I cannot have proper, normal conversations between ourselves or other members
of our family (or even our friends or legal advisers etc etc but these are other issues). My mother and I
cannot have proper, normal conversations because of concerns that I or she may accidently break (or
maliciously and falsely be accused of breaking) the law if we digress into discussing anything to do with the
case. I am told this is a gross violation of the basic constitutional human rights of four generations of the
Adams family. I am told this situation is contrary to how the High Court of Australia requires its federal
Judges, Magistrates and other judicial officers to go about their judicial functions and actions.

3.I have suffered hardships and delay in being able to make this appeal because I have at all times,
including at the part trial abandonned by Federal Magistrate Macbeth been self-represented. My mother's
pockets do not run as deep as the Australian Government's pockets and the Gotham City Government's
pockets (and I note that the First Respondent is not only represented and funded by the Australian and 2
Gotham State Governments but the First Respondent also works in and draws a salary from one of those

Signature of person making this affidavit (deponent) Signature of witness


Government pockets and benefits from the pocket of the other Government). I was fortunate that a federal
barrister and solicitor of almost 20 years goodstanding agreed to fly over 1500 miles up to Capital City 4
days before the trial (on the Saturday of a 4 day Australia Day long weekend) at his own expense to
represent me as my barrister at the hearing before Federal Magistrate Macbeth. However, not only did
Federal Magistrate Macbeth accuse me of being paranoid for complaining about all of the Australian and
Gotham State Government funded and employed lawyers promoting the First Respondent's lawyer-led
abuse against me and against my daughter (and four generations of the Adams family) including at least 5
lawyers (3 solicitors and 2 barristers actively involved at the bar table) and at least 2 fully paid Gotham
State legal aid solicitors (paid their day's salaries to sit at the back of the court merely watching the
spetacle). Not only that, but Federal Magistrate Macbeth purported to ban me from being represented by
my barrister Mr His Lawyer, the only barrister in Australia, so far as I am aware, who was prepared to speak
out, politely, franklessly and fearlessly in a quite possibly fruitless effort to try to get the proceedings to
proceed according to the standards of the Australian constitution as interpreted and pronounced by the
High Court of Australia. I am told both aspects of this are gross violations of the basic constitutional human
rights of at least three generations of the Adams family (my rights, my mother's rights and my daughter's
rights) and probably all four generations of the Adams family. I am told this situation is contrary to how the
High Court of Australia requires its federal Judges, Magistrates and other judicial officers to go about their
judicial functions and actions. As illustration of the importance to me of being represented by Mr His
Lawyer during the three days of hearings before Federal Magistrate Macbeth (neither he nor I taking much
in the way of sleep for the 96 hours before the first morning of hearings) both I and my mother also wept
with disbelief that there was a barrister in Australia willing to come such a distance out of his own pocket to
speak up for my and our (and indirectly my daughter's rights) when ever other lawyer I approached wanted
tens of thousands of dollars up front to read the story so far before giving me an answer (no doubt in the
negative) whether he or she would take my case).

4. I have been up to the Federal Court personally on 3 occasions, 25 August 2010, 26 August 2010 and 8
September 2010 and my barrister has been up to the Court on other ocassions trying to obtain a certificate
of authenticated orders made by Federal Magistrate Macbeth. All these efforts have proven fruitless.

5. I think that this Court should order Federal Magistrate Macbeth to produce a proper certificate
authenticating all of the orders that she made on each of the days of 27, 28 and 29 July 2010. I note that
whilst Her Honour has produced not one but two certificates in respect of the third day, but not any for either
of the first or the second day. And I note that the two certificates of authentication as produced for the third
day do not accurately and comprehensively cover each of the orders that Federal Magistrate Macbeth
made on that third day. As my legal representatives are preparing appeal documents in accordance with
applicable laws and rules, it is not appropriate for me to substantiate these concerns at the present time.

2.

Signature of person making this affidavit (deponent) Signature of witness


Part E Signature

I swear* /affirm* the contents of this affidavit are true

Signature of Deponent

Place Gotham State Date 10/09/2010

Before me (signature of witness)

His Lawyer
Full name of witness (please print)

Justice of the Peace


Notary public
✘ Lawyer

* delete whichever is inapplicable

This affidavit was prepared / settled by deponent/s


✘ lawyer His Lawyer

PRINT NAME AND LAWYER’S CODE

AFFIDAVIT 01/07/06 V1

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi