Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 2

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

234 / Wednesday, December 7, 2005 / Proposed Rules 72739

then continues northwest a short DATES: Comments must be received no with those entities, on notice that an
distance to the eastern-most later than January 6, 2006. You may also investigation exists and that such
transmission line in the northwest submit comments through the Federal person is the subject of that
quadrant of section 18, T4S, R6E, (Solyo rulemaking portal at http:// investigation.
map); then www.regulations.gov (follow the (ii) Such release would provide the
(10) Proceed 8.45 miles straight instructions for submitting comments). tax exempt or government entity subject
northwest along the eastern-most ADDRESSES: Please submit comments to to investigation, or individuals
transmission line, crossing from the the Office of Governmental Liaison and connected with those entities, with an
Solyo map, over the Lone Tree Creek Disclosure, 1111 Constitution Avenue, accurate accounting of the date, nature,
map, to the Tracy map, and continue to NW., Washington, DC 20224. Comments and purpose of each disclosure and the
the transmission line’s intersection with will be made available for inspection at name and address of the person or
the western boundary of section 19, the IRS Freedom of Information Reading agency to which disclosure was made.
T3S, R5W, about 0.7 mile north- Room (Room 1621), at the above The release of such information to the
northeast of Black Butte (Tracy map); address. The telephone number for the individual covered by the system would
then Reading Room is (202) 622–5164. provide the individual or entity subject
(11) Proceed in a straight line 2 miles to investigation with significant
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
northwest to the line’s intersection with information concerning the nature of the
Telephonic inquiries should be directed
the 500-foot elevation line, immediately investigation and could result in the
to Marianne Davis, Program Analyst,
north of an unimproved road, at about altering or destruction of documentary
Internal Revenue Service, Tax Exempt/
the mid-point of the western boundary evidence, the improper influencing of
Government Entities Division (TE/GE),
line of section 12, T3S, R4E (Tracy witnesses, and other activities that
at telephone number (949) 389–4304.
map); then could impede or compromise the
Written inquiries should be directed to investigation. In the case of a delinquent
(12) Proceed 0.65 mile straight north
Robert Brenneman, TE/GE Reporting account, such release might enable the
along with western boundaries of
and Electronic Examination System subject of the investigation to dissipate
section 12 and section 3 to the section
(TREES) Project Manager, at Internal assets before levy.
line’s intersection with Interstate 580,
Revenue Service, TE/GE Business (iii) Release to the individual of the
section 3, T3S, R4E (Tracy map); then
(13) Proceed 0.8 mile straight Systems Planning (SE:T:BSP), 1111 disclosure accounting would alert the
northwest along Interstate 580 highway Constitution Avenue, NW., Attn: PE– individual as to which agencies were
to its intersection with the Western 6M4, Washington, DC 20224. investigating the tax exempt or
Pacific railway in section 2, T3S, R4E SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under 5 government entity subject to
(Midway map); then U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), the head of an agency investigation, would provide
(14) Proceed easterly 0.7 mile along may promulgate rules to exempt a information concerning the scope of the
the Western Pacific railway to its system of records from certain investigation, and could aid the
intersection with the eastern boundary provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a if the system individual in impeding or
line of section 2, T3S, R4E (Tracy map); contains investigatory material compromising investigations by those
and compiled for law enforcement purposes. agencies.
(15) Proceed east for 1 mile in a The IRS is hereby giving notice of a (2) 5 U.S.C. 552a (d) (1), (2), (3) and
straight line, returning to the point of proposed rule to exempt ‘‘IRS 50.222 (4), (e) (4) (G), (e) (4) (H), and (f). These
beginning at the intersection of Delta- Tax Exempt/Government Entities (TE/ provisions of the Privacy Act relate to
Mendota Canal and Lammers Ferry GE) Case Management Records’’ from an individual’s right to be notified of:
Road (Tracy map). certain provisions of the Privacy Act of The existence of records pertaining to
1974, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2). such individual; requirements for
Signed: November 3, 2005.
The proposed exemption is from identifying an individual who requested
John J. Manfreda,
provisions 552a(c)(3), (d) (1), (2), (3) and access to records; the agency procedures
Administrator. (4), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I), relating to access to records; the content
[FR Doc. 05–23681 Filed 12–6–05; 8:45 am] and (f) because the system contains of the information contained in such
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P investigatory material compiled for law records; and the civil remedies available
enforcement purposes. A proposed to the individual in the event of adverse
notice to establish the Privacy Act determinations by an agency concerning
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY system of records will be published access to or amendment of information
separately in the Federal Register. contained in record systems.
31 CFR Part 1 The following are the reasons why The reasons for exempting this system
this system of records maintained by the of records from the foregoing provisions
Privacy Act; Proposed Implementation IRS is exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. are as follows:
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service, 552a(k)(2) of the Privacy Act of 1974: Notifying an individual (at the
Treasury. (1) 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3). These individual’s request) of the existence of
ACTION: Proposed rule. provisions of the Privacy Act provide an investigative file pertaining to such
for the release of the disclosure individual or granting access to an
SUMMARY: In accordance with the accounting required by 5 U.S.C. investigative file pertaining to such
requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974, 552a(c)(1) and (2) to the individual individual could: Interfere with
as amended, the Department of the named in the record at his/her request. investigative and enforcement
Treasury gives notice of a proposed The reasons for exempting this system proceedings; deprive co-defendants of a
amendment to this part to exempt a new of records from the foregoing provisions right to a fair trial or an impartial
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) system of are: adjudication; constitute an unwarranted
records entitled ‘‘IRS 50.222 Tax (i) The release of disclosure invasion of the personal privacy of
Exempt/Government Entities (TE/GE) accounting would put the tax exempt or others; disclose the identity of
Case Management Records’’ from certain government entity subject to confidential sources and reveal
provisions of the Privacy Act. investigation, or individuals connected confidential information supplied by

VerDate Aug<31>2005 13:00 Dec 06, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\07DEP1.SGM 07DEP1
72740 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 234 / Wednesday, December 7, 2005 / Proposed Rules

such sources; or disclose investigative The proposed rule imposes no duties or ACTION: Proposed rule.
techniques and procedures. obligations on small entities.
In accordance with the provisions of SUMMARY: The EPA proposes to approve
(3) 5 U.S.C. 552a (e) (1). This
provision of the Privacy Act requires the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, revisions to the Texas State
each agency to maintain in its records the Department of the Treasury has Implementation Plan (SIP) which the
only such information about an determined that this proposed rule Texas Commission on Environmental
individual as is relevant and necessary would not impose new recordkeeping, Quality (TCEQ) submitted to EPA on
to accomplish a purpose of the agency application, reporting, or other types of February 5, 2004. The adopted
information collection requirements. amendments revise minimum distance
required to be accomplished by statute
limitation permit requirements for
or executive order. The reasons for
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 1 operation of new and modified sources
exempting this system of records from
Privacy. to allow storage of an inoperative
the foregoing provision are as follows:
concrete crusher within 440 yards of a
(i) The IRS will limit the system to Part 1, subpart C of title 31 of the
residence, school, or place of worship;
those records that are needed for Code of Federal Regulations is amended
define how distance measurements
compliance with the provisions of Title as follows:
should be taken and when they would
26. However, an exemption from the
PART 1—[AMENDED] be applicable to concrete crushers and
foregoing is needed because,
other facilities; and allow concrete
particularly in the early stages of an 1. The authority citation for part 1 crushers to recycle broken concrete at
investigation, it is not possible to continues to read as follows: temporary demolition sites within 440
determine the relevance or necessity of
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 31 U.S.C. 321. yards of nearby buildings, unless the
specific information.
Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552 as facility is located in a county with a
(ii) Relevance and necessity are population of 2.4 million or more, or in
amended. Subpart C also issued under 5
questions of judgment and timing. What U.S.C. 552a. a county adjacent to such a county. The
appears relevant and necessary when 2. Section 1.36 paragraph (g)(1)(viii) is TCEQ also revised the existing distance
first received may subsequently be amended by adding the following text to limitation for hazardous waste
determined to be irrelevant or the table in numerical order. management facilities to cross-reference
unnecessary. It is only after the duplicative language elsewhere in its
information is evaluated that the § 1.36 Systems exempt in whole or in part
regulations. This action is being taken
relevance and necessity of such from provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a and this
part. under section 110 of the Federal Clean
information can be established with Air Act (the Act, or CAA).
certainty. * * * * *
DATES: Written comments must be
(4) 5 U.S.C. 552a (e) (4) (I). This (g) * * *
(1) * * * received on or before January 6, 2006.
provision of the Privacy Act requires the
publication of the categories of sources (viii) * * * ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to
of records in each system of records. Mr. David Neleigh, Chief, Air Permits
The reasons for exempting this system No. Name of system Section (6PD–R), Environmental
of records from this provision are as Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue,
follows: Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733.
* * * * * Comments may also be submitted
(i) Revealing categories of sources of IRS 50.222 ....... Tax Exempt/Government
information could disclose investigative electronically or through hand delivery/
Entities Case Manage- courier by following the detailed
techniques and procedures. ment Records.
(ii) Revealing categories of sources of instructions in the Addresses section of
information could cause sources who * * * * * the direct final rule located in the rules
supply information to investigators to section of this Federal Register.
refrain from giving such information * * * * * FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
because of fear of reprisal, or fear of Stanley M. Spruiell, Air Permits Section
breach of promises of anonymity and Dated: November 18, 2005. (6PD–R), Environmental Protection
confidentiality. Sandra L. Pack, Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
As required by Executive Order Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733,
Assistant Secretary for Management and
12866, it has been determined that this Chief Financial Officer. telephone (214) 665–7212; fax number
proposed rule is not a significant (214) 665–7263; e-mail address
[FR Doc. E5–7001 Filed 12–6–05; 8:45 am]
regulatory action, and therefore, does spruiell.stanley@epa.gov.
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
not require a regulatory impact analysis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
The regulation will not have a final rules section of this Federal
substantial direct effect on the States, on ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Register, EPA is approving the State’s
the relationship between the Federal AGENCY SIP submittal as a direct final rule
Government and the States, or on the without prior proposal because the
distribution of power and 40 CFR Part 52 Agency views this as a noncontroversial
responsibilities among the various submittal and anticipates no adverse
[R06–OAR–2005–TX–0030; FRL–8006–1]
levels of government. Therefore, it is comments. A detailed rationale for the
determined that this proposed rule does Approval and Promulgation of approval is set forth in the direct final
not have federalism implications under Implementation Plans; Texas; rule. If no adverse comments are
Executive Order 13132. Revisions to Regulations for Control of received in response to this action rule,
Pursuant to the requirements of the Air Pollution by Permits for New no further activity is contemplated. If
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601– Sources and Modifications EPA receives adverse comments, the
612, it is hereby certified that these direct final rule will be withdrawn and
regulations will not significantly affect a AGENCY: Environmental Protection all public comments received will be
substantial number of small entities. Agency (EPA). addressed in a subsequent final rule

VerDate Aug<31>2005 13:00 Dec 06, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\07DEP1.SGM 07DEP1

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi