Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Volume: 2 Issue: 7
ISSN: 2321-8169
1821 1826
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
J. C. Agunwamba
AbstractThe physicochemical characteristics associated with industrial effluent discharge from the Challawa and Sharada
Industrial Estates in Kano, Kano State, northern Nigeria and the dominant influence on water quality, 10.644 km stretch
downstream the water course were investigated. Test period covered the wet and dry seasons with laboratory analysis of field
samples and study area. The effluents discharge into River Challawa at two point sources: at Yandanko and Tamburawa
respectively. The results obtained indicated that the DO values ranged from 2.4 mg/l to 1.9 mg/l, while the BOD 5 ranged from 443
mg/l to 1654 mg/l; the COD ranged from 1296 mg/l to 4565 mg/l. The self-purification factor (f) for the River Challawa varies
between 0.40 per day and 0.56 per day which puts the river in the sluggish stream category and as a heavily polluted stream.
Keywords-water quality, industrial effluents, point sources, self-purification factor, wet and dry seasons.
__________________________________________________*****_________________________________________________
I.
INTRODUCTION
STUDY AREA
The study was carried out from three different areas: on (i)
Challawa River with eight sampling stations, (ii) Waste
discharges from effluents in the Sharada Industrial Estate such
as the Unique Leather Finishing and others discharging into the
N
Effluents from
Challawa
Industrial Estate
(Sampling Points
1 5)
River Challawa
6 7
Effluents from
Sharada Industrial
Estate (Sampling
Points 9 13)
14 15
16
17
Bridge 1
To Wudil
18
Bridge 2
(At Tamburawa)
(At Yandanko)
River
Kano
Figure 1. A schematic outline of River Challawa, effluent discharges, sampling points and confluence with River Kano
1821
IJRITCC | July 2014, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
_______________________________________________________________________________________
ISSN: 2321-8169
1821 1826
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
III.
SCOPE OF STUDY
LITERATURE REVIEW
k2
3.9V
H
(1)
(6)
_______________________________________________________________________________________
ISSN: 2321-8169
1821 1826
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
METHODOLOGY
Temperature (oC)
A. Temperature
The industrial effluents affect the water quality in the River
Challawa more in the wet season than in the dry season as
shown in Fig. 3 with average temperatures of 30.1oC, 31.2oC
respectively at the upstream and downstream sections. In
general, the average temperature in River Challawa is less than
the standard value of 40oC prescribed by the Federal
Environmental Protection Agency (FEPA) for industrial
effluents.
45.0
Dry Season
40.0
Wet Season
8.0
Dry Season
7.8
Wet Season
7.6
7.4
pH
V.
B. pH
The pH values of the industrial effluents from the industrial
estates affect the water quality of River Challawa more in the
dry season than in the wet season with average values of 7.8
and 7.1 respectively in the downstream. The industrial effluents
have an alkaline effect on the River Challawa water quality.
The average value of pH is higher than the standard of 6.9 as
prescribed by the Federal Environmental Protection Agency (as
shown in Fig. 4).
7.2
7.0
6.8
6.6
6.4
Upstream
Upstream
(TA7)
Figure 4.
5,000.0
Dry Season
4,500.0
4,000.0
3,500.0
3,000.0
2,500.0
2,000.0
1,500.0
1,000.0
500.0
0.0
Wet Season
Upstream
Upstream
(TA7)
35.0
30.0
25.0
COD (mg/l)
Point Source
FEPA
Point Source Downstream
Downstream FEPA
Standard
(TA6)Location (TA8)
20.0
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
Upstream
Upstream
(TA7)
Point Source
Source Downstream
Downstream
Point
(TA6)
(TA8)
Location
FEPA
FEPA
Standard
Upstream
FEPA
1823
IJRITCC | July 2014, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
_______________________________________________________________________________________
ISSN: 2321-8169
1821 1826
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
obtained far exceed the standard value of 50mg/l prescribed by
the Federal Environmental Protection Agency (FEPA).
450.0
Dry Season
400.0
Wet Season
1,800.0
Dry Season
1,600.0
Wet Season
1,400.0
BOD (mg/l)
TSS (mg/l)
350.0
300.0
250.0
200.0
150.0
100.0
1,200.0
50.0
1,000.0
0.0
Upstream
Upstream
(TA15)
800.0
600.0
PointSource
Source Downstream
Downstream FEPAFEPA
Point
Standard
(TA14)Location(TA16)
400.0
200.0
Upstream
Upstream
(TA7)
PointSource
Source Downstream
Downstream FEPAFEPA
Point
Standard
(TA6) Location(TA8)
Dry Season
3,500.0
Wet Season
3,000.0
TDS (mg/l)
0.0
2,500.0
2,000.0
1,500.0
1,000.0
Dry Season
6.0
500.0
Wet Season
5.0
0.0
DO (mg/l)
Upstream
Upstream
(TA15)
4.0
3.0
Point Source
Downstream
2.0
1.0
0.0
Upstream
Upstream
(TA15)
Point Source
Source Downstream
Downstream FEPAFEPA
Point
Standard
(TA14)Location(TA16)
Dry Season
5,000.0
Wet Season
4,000.0
TS (mg/l)
6,000.0
3,000.0
2,000.0
1,000.0
0.0
Upstream
Upstream
(TA15)
I.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
ISSN: 2321-8169
1821 1826
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
cfu/100ml and 15 cfu/100ml in River Challawa in the dry and
wet seasons respectively, signifying the pollution of the stream.
14
12
cfu/100ml
50
Dry Season
Challawa
Estate
Wet Season
Sharada
Estate
40
30
20
60
Measured
MeasuredO
O2
Deficit
2 Deficit
10
Computed O2 Deficit
Computed O2 Deficit
(Conventional)
(Conventional)
Computed
Computed O
O22 Deficit
Deficit (with
Variable
k2) k2)
(with
Variable
8
6
4
10
0
Coliform
E. coli
10
12
Distance (km)
Figure 11. Coliform and e. coli concentrations in River Challawa in the dry
and wet seasons
J.
Oxygen Deficit
Fig. 12 shows the trend of oxygen deficit with increased
distance along River Challawa showing self purification up to
9km from the upstream, where waste industrial effluents are
introduced.
TABLE I.
S/N
Parameter
Upstream
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Temperature
pH
COD
BOD
DO
TSS
DS
TS
TABLE II.
S/N
29.7
7.2
707
247
2.3
296
330
626
Upstream
30.7
7.3
1087
389
2.4
263
5333
5596
Wet Season
Point
Source
31.3
7.6
4565
1654
0.0
971
12000
12971
Downstream
30.1
7.1
103
37
2.0
241
843
1084
Parameter
Upstream
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Dry Season
Point
Downstream
Source
29.2
29.0
7.6
7.8
3847
792
1241
274
0.0
1.9
636
239
9527
6283
10163
6522
Temperature
Ph
COD
BOD
DO
TSS
DS
TS
28.0
7.0
800
281
2.4
207
986
1193
Dry Season
Point
Downstream
Source
29.7
28.3
7.1
7.4
2751
1497
610
530
0.7
1.1
393
320
2843
3640
3236
3960
Upstream
30.9
7.0
209
75
1.7
240
734
974
Wet Season
Point
Source
29.7
4.7
1296
443
2.2
327
767
1094
Downstream
31.2
7.2
521
177
1.9
283
560
843
1825
IJRITCC | July 2014, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
_______________________________________________________________________________________
ISSN: 2321-8169
1821 1826
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
VII. CONCLUSION
Samples of wastewater from industrial effluents from
Challawa and Sharada industries in River Challawa where
these wastewaters are discharged into were collected and
analysed in the laboratory. The wastewaters from the tanneries
were very high in BOD, COD, SS, TDS and Total Solids. With
such high concentrations of pollutants, their discharges into the
two rivers constitute serious sources of pollution and threat to
public and environmental health. This was evident from the
results of water quality analysis of several samples collected
from different sections of the Challawa River. The values of the
pollutants, especially with respect to BOD, Suspended Solids,
dissolved COD and Total Solids, were above the FEPA
standards.
The procedure for sampling and analysis of wastewater
could be time consuming and fraught with pitfalls, especially
when results are needed urgently in cases like an outbreak of
contagious water borne disease. However, mathematical
models can be designed which provide a simple, economic and
precise means of interpreting results leading to satisfactory
findings.
Interrelationships were established between some physicochemical wastewater pollution indicators where reliable
correlations were established using statistical analysis. This
indicates the reliability of the relationships which suggests that
it can be used to predict the levels of pollution by the
parameters investigated and possibly proffering a preventive
measure prior to detailed investigation of industrial pollution
monitoring.
Re-aeration, settling and de-oxygenation experiments were
also conducted in the laboratories. The re-aeration coefficients
were low in comparison with values obtained from some rivers
in Southern Nigeria perhaps because of high temperature in the
semi-arid area. High temperature reduces the level of oxygen
absorption from the atmosphere.
The re-aeration co-efficient varies along the river reaches
and its variability may be the reason why the use of average
values over a long river in computing oxygen sag may not yield
correct predictions. The BOD reaction constant was relatively
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
P.J.W. Roberts, Marine disposal, New World Wat., pp. 111113, 1995.
C.M.A. Ademoroti, Standard Methods for Water and Effluents
Analysis. Foludex Press Ltd. Ibadan, 1996, 182pp.
D.J. OConnor, and W.E. Dobbins, Mechanism of re-aeration
in natural streams, Transaction of the American Society of
Civil Engineers, vol 123, pp 641-666, 1958.
M.A. Churchill, H.L. Elmore, and R.A. Buckingham, The
prediction of stream reaeration rates, Journal of Sanitary Eng.
Division ASCE 88 (SA4) pp 1-46, 1962.
C. Gualtieri and P. Gualterie, Statistical analysis of reparation
rate in streams, International Agricultural Engineering
Conference (ICAE) 99, Pechino, China, pp. 14117, December
1999.
J.C. Agunwamba, C.N. Maduka, and A.M. Ofosaren, Analysis
of pollution status of Amadi Creek and its management, Journal
of Water Supply Research and TechnologyAQUA 55.6.,
2006, pp 427-435
C.M.A. Ademoroti, Environmental management: Case studies
in industrial wastewater treatment, in Environmental issues and
Management in National Development, P.O. Sada, and F.O.
Odemerho, Eds. Evans Brothers Publishers Ltd., Nigeria, 1988.
HACH, Water Analysis Handbook, 3rd ed., HACH Company;
Loveland, Colorado USA, 1997, pp. 5-7.
FEPA, Guidelines and Standards for Environmental Pollution
Control in Nigeria, Nigeria, 1982, pp 54-55.
1826
IJRITCC | July 2014, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
_______________________________________________________________________________________