Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 2

67192 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

213 / Friday, November 4, 2005 / Notices

INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND International Bridge. Phase 2, for Phase 2 Alternatives


WATER COMMISSION; UNITED subsequent implementation, covers the A Phase 2 No Action Alternative and
STATES AND MEXICO 1.2-mile downstream reach starting at two action alternatives to the Proposed
the international bridge. The phased Action were evaluated for Phase 2 of the
United States Section; Notice of construction approach responds to the levee system improvement project: the
Availability of a Final Environmental likely availability of early funding for Footprint Expansion Alternative, and
Assessment and Finding of No Phase 1, the upstream reach of the the No-Footprint Expansion Alternative.
Significant Impact for Alternatives for project. Under the Phase 2 No Action
Improved Flood Control of the Hidalgo Alternative, the existing Hidalgo
Protective Levee System, in the Lower In-place increase of levee height
under the Phase 1 Footprint Expansion Protective Levee System would be
Rio Grande Flood Control Project, retained in its current configuration
Located in Hidalgo County, TX. Alternative is the Proposed Action for
Phase 1 of the project. This alternative along levee miles 3.3 to 4.5.
AGENCY: United States Section, will increase flood containment Under the Phase 2 Footprint
International Boundary and Water capacity by raising the height of the Expansion Alternative, height of the
Commission (USIBWC), United States existing compacted earthen levee to existing levee would be increased with
and Mexico. meet the freeboard requirement the associated lateral expansion of the
ACTION: Notice of Availability of Final indicated by the hydraulic model. Soil footprint. Placement of floodwalls
Environmental Assessment (EA) and borrow easements will be used to secure would be required at two segments
Finding of No Significant Impact levee material. where retaining walls are currently
(FONSI). present: along the two spans of the
Partial rerouting of the 1.2-mile Hidalgo-Reynosa International Bridge,
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(c) downstream reach of the levee system and along the Hidalgo Historic
of the National Environmental Policy under the Partial Levee Rerouting Pumphouse.
Act of 1969; the Council on Alternative is the Phase 2 Proposed Under the No-Footprint Expansion
Environmental Quality Final Action. Levee rerouting is proposed to Alternative, a mechanically stabilized
Regulations (40 CFR Parts 1500 through eliminate the need for construction of a earth structure along the levee crown
1508); and the USIBWC’s Operational floodwall in front of the Hidalgo would eliminate the need for an
Procedures for Implementing Section Historic Pumphouse, a resource expanded earthen levee and footprint
102 of NEPA, published in the Federal included in the National Register of expansion. Floodwall placement would
Register September 2, 1981, (46 FR Historic Places (NRHP). A new levee be required both at the Hidalgo Historic
44083); the USIBWC hereby gives notice segment, approximately 0.7 mile in Pumphouse and along the two spans of
that the Final Environmental length, will be built along the south the Hidalgo-Reynosa International
Assessment and Finding of No margin of the pumphouse intake Bridge.
Significant Impact for Alternatives for channel, and the channel will be
Improved Flood Control of the Hidalgo crossed to tie the new structure to the Availability
Protective Levee System, in the Lower existing levee system. Floodwall Single hard copies of the Final
Rio Grande Flood Control Project, placement will be required along the Environmental Assessment and final
located in Hidalgo County, Texas are Hidalgo-Reynosa International Bridge. Finding of No Significant Impact may be
available. A notice of finding of no Alternatives under consideration to obtained by request at the above
significant impact dated June 30, 2005, improve the Hidalgo Protective Levee address. Electronic copies may also be
provided a thirty (30) day comment System will expand the levee footprint obtained from the USIBWC Home Page
period before making the finding final. by lateral extension of the structure. at http://www.ibwc.state.gov.
The Notice was published in the Levee footprint increases toward the Dated: October 24, 2005.
Federal Register on July 8, 2005 (70 FR riverside could potentially extend into Susan Daniel,
39527). floodplain areas designated by the U.S. General Counsel.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fish and Wildlife Service as part of the [FR Doc. 05–22089 Filed 11–3–05; 8:45 am]
Gilbert Anaya, Environmental Lower Rio Grande Valley (LRGV) BILLING CODE 7010–01–P
Management Division; United States National Wildlife Refuge System.
Section, International Boundary and Footprint increases toward the levee
Water Commission; 4171 N. Mesa, C– landside could extend beyond the
100; El Paso, Texas 79902. Telephone: INTERNATIONAL TRADE
USIBWC right-of-way. COMMISSION
(915) 832–4703, e-mail:
gilbertanaya@ibwc.state.gov. Alternatives Considered [Inv. No. 337–TA–552]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Phase 1 Alternative Certain Flash Memory Devices and
Proposed Action A Phase 1 No Action Alternative was Components Thereof, and Products
The USIBWC is considering evaluated for the 3.3-mile upstream Containing Such Devices and
alternatives to raise the Hidalgo reach of the levee system. This Components; Notice of Investigation
Protective Levee System. The proposed alternative would retain the existing AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
action will take place in two configuration of the Hidalgo Protective Commission.
construction phases, each covering Levee System, as designed over 30 years ACTION: Institution of investigation
separate geographic reaches of the ago, and the current level of protection pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
Hidalgo Protective Levee System. Phase currently associated with this system.
1 encompasses the upstream 3.3-mile Under severe storm events, current SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a
reach of the levee system, from the containment capacity will be complaint was filed with the U.S.
Hidalgo Levee junction with the insufficient to fully control Rio Grande International Trade Commission on
LRGFCP Main Floodway, to the west flooding with risks to personal safety September 29, 2005, under section 337
margin of the Hidalgo-Reynosa and property. of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,

VerDate Aug<31>2005 22:35 Nov 03, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM 04NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 213 / Friday, November 4, 2005 / Notices 67193

19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Toshiba violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of Commission, without further notice to
Corporation of Tokyo, Japan. A section 337 in the importation into the the respondent, to find the facts to be as
supplemental letter was filed on United States, the sale for importation, alleged in the complaint and this notice
October 20, 2005. The complaint alleges or the sale within the United States after and to enter a final determination
violations of section 337 in the importation of certain flash memory containing such findings, and may
importation into the United States, the devices or components thereof, or result in the issuance of a limited
sale for importation, and the sale within products containing such devices or exclusion order or cease and desist
the United States after importation of components, by reason of infringement order or both directed against the
certain flash memory devices and of one or more of claims 1–4 of U.S. respondent.
components thereof, and products Patent No. 5,150,178, claims 1 and 6–7 Issued: October 31, 2005.
containing such devices and of U.S. Patent No. 5,270,969, and claims By order of the Commission.
components, by reason of infringement 1 and 4 of U.S. Patent No. 5,517,449,
Marilyn R. Abbott,
of claims 1–4 of U.S. Patent No. and whether an industry in the United
5,150,178, claims 1 and 6–7 of U.S. States exists as required by subsection Secretary to the Commission.
Patent No. 5,270,969, and claims 1 and (a)(2) of section 337. [FR Doc. 05–22017 Filed 11–3–05; 8:45 am]
4 of U.S. Patent No. 5,517,449. The (2) For the purpose of the BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
complaint further alleges that an investigation so instituted, the following
industry in the United States exists as are hereby named as parties upon which
required by subsection (a)(2) of section this notice of investigation shall be INTERNATIONAL TRADE
337. served: COMMISSION
The complainant requests that the (a) The complainant is: [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–401 (Review)
Commission institute an investigation Toshiba Corporation, 1–1 Shibaura 1– and 731–TA–853 and 854 (Review)]
and, after the investigation, issue a Chome, Minato-KU, Tokyo 105–8001,
permanent exclusion order and Japan. Structural Steel Beams from Japan and
permanent cease and desist orders. (b) The respondents are the following Korea
companies alleged to be in violation of
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for AGENCY: United States International
section 337, and are the parties upon
any confidential information contained Trade Commission.
which the complaint is to be served:
therein, is available for inspection Hynix Semiconductor, San 136–1, ACTION: Revised schedule for the subject
during official business hours (8:45 a.m. Ami-Ri Bubal-eub, 1chon-si, Kyoungki- reviews.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the do, Korea.
Secretary, U.S. International Trade Hynix Semiconductor America, Inc., DATES: Effective October 19, 2005.
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 3101 North First Street, San Jose, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone California 95134. Joann Tortorice (202–205–3032) or
202–205–2000. Hearing impaired (c) Bryan F. Moore, Esq., Office of Douglas Corkran (202–205–3057), Office
individuals are advised that information Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. of Investigations, U.S. International
on this matter can be obtained by International Trade Commission, 500 E Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
contacting the Commission’s TDD Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-
terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons 20436, who shall be the Commission impaired persons can obtain
with mobility impairments who will investigative attorney, party to this information on this matter by contacting
need special assistance in gaining access investigation; and the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
to the Commission should contact the (3) For the investigation so instituted, 205–1810. Persons with mobility
Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. the Honorable Paul J. Luckern is impairments who will need special
General information concerning the designated as the presiding assistance in gaining access to the
Commission may also be obtained by administrative law judge. Commission should contact the Office
accessing its Internet server at http:// Responses to the complaint and the of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
www.usitc.gov. The public record for notice of investigation must be General information concerning the
this investigation may be viewed on the submitted by the named respondents in Commission may also be obtained by
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) accordance with section 210.13 of the accessing its Internet server (http://
at http://edis.usitc.gov. Commission’s Rules of Practice and www.usitc.gov). The public record for
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to these reviews may be viewed on the
Bryan F. Moore, Esq., Office of Unfair 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
Import Investigations, U.S. International responses will be considered by the at http://edis.usitc.gov.
Trade Commission, telephone 202–205– Commission if received not later than 20
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective
2767. days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the September 9, 2005, the Commission
Authority: The authority for institution of established a schedule for the conduct
this investigation is contained in section 337 notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the of the subject reviews (70 FR 54962,
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and September 19, 2005). Subsequently,
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules complaint and the notice of
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 investigation will not be granted unless counsel for domestic interested parties
(2005). good cause therefor is shown. requested that the Commission extend
Scope of Investigation: Having Failure of a respondent to file a timely the date for filing prehearing briefs by
considered the complaint, the U.S. response to each allegation in the two business days to alleviate the
International Trade Commission, on complaint and in this notice may be hardship placed on administrative
October 31, 2005, Ordered That— deemed to constitute a waiver of the personnel.1 Counsel suggested no other
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of right to appear and contest the 1 Letter to the Secretary of the Commission from
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as allegations of the complaint and this Wiley Rein & Fielding, on behalf of Nucor Corp.,
amended, an investigation be instituted notice, and to authorize the Nucor-Yamato Steel Co., Steel Dynamics, Inc., and
to determine whether there is a administrative law judge and the Continued

VerDate Aug<31>2005 22:35 Nov 03, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM 04NON1

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi