Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 3

61382 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

204 / Monday, October 24, 2005 / Rules and Regulations

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Congress Street, 11th floor, (CAQ), Suite 1100, Boston, MA. EPA requests
AGENCY Boston, MA 02114–2023. Such that if at all possible, you contact the
deliveries are only accepted during the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER
40 CFR Part 52 Regional Office’s normal hours of INFORMATION CONTACT section to
[R01–OAR–2005–ME–0004; A–1–FRL–7982– operation. The Regional Office’s official schedule your inspection. The Regional
3] hours of business are Monday through Office’s official hours of business are
Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30,
Approval and Promulgation of Air holidays. excluding Federal holidays.
Quality Implementation Plans; Maine; Instructions: Direct your comments to FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Consumer Products Regulation Regional Material in EDocket (RME) ID Anne Arnold, Air Quality Planning
Number R01–OAR–2005–ME–0004. Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection
AGENCY: Environmental Protection EPA’s policy is that all comments
Agency (EPA). Agency, EPA New England Regional
received will be included in the public Office, One Congress Street, Suite 1100
ACTION: Direct final rule. docket without change and may be (CAQ), Boston, MA 02114–2023, (617)
made available online at http:// 918–1047, arnold.anne@epa.gov.
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State
docket.epa.gov/rmepub/, including any
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision personal information provided, unless SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
submitted by the State of Maine. This the comment includes information I. General Information
revision establishes requirements to claimed to be Confidential Business
reduce volatile organic compound Information (CBI) or other information A. How Can I Get Copies of This
(VOC) emissions from consumer whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Document and Other Related
products. The intended effect of this Do not submit information that you Information?
action is to approve these requirements consider to be CBI or otherwise In addition to the publicly available
into the Maine SIP. EPA is taking this protected through Regional Material in docket materials available for inspection
action in accordance with the Clean Air EDocket (RME), regulations.gov, or e- electronically in Regional Material in
Act (CAA). mail. The EPA RME Web site and the EDocket, and the hard copy available at
DATES: This direct final rule will be federal regulations.gov Web site are the Regional Office, which are identified
effective December 23, 2005, unless EPA ‘‘anonymous access’’ systems, which in the ADDRESSES section above, copies
receives adverse comments by means EPA will not know your identity of the state submittal and EPA’s
November 23, 2005. If adverse or contact information unless you technical support document are also
comments are received, EPA will provide it in the body of your comment. available for public inspection during
publish a timely withdrawal of the If you send an e-mail comment directly normal business hours, by appointment
direct final rule in the Federal Register to EPA without going through RME or at the Bureau of Air Quality Control,
informing the public that the rule will regulations.gov, your e-mail address Department of Environmental
not take effect. will be automatically captured and Protection, First Floor of the Tyson
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, included as part of the comment that is Building, Augusta Mental Health
identified by Regional Material in placed in the public docket and made Institute Complex, Augusta, ME 04333–
EDocket (RME) ID Number R01–OAR– available on the Internet. If you submit 0017.
2005–ME–0004 by one of the following an electronic comment, EPA
methods: recommends that you include your II. Rulemaking Information
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: name and other contact information in This section is organized as follows:
http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the the body of your comment and with any
A. What Action Is EPA Taking?
on-line instructions for submitting disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA B. What Are the Requirements of Maine’s
comments. cannot read your comment due to New Regulation?
2. Agency Web site: http:// technical difficulties and cannot contact C. Why Is EPA Approving Maine’s
docket.epa.gov/rmepub/ Regional you for clarification, EPA may not be Regulation?
Material in EDocket (RME), EPA’s able to consider your comment. D. What Is the Process for EPA To Approve
electronic public docket and comment Electronic files should avoid the use of This SIP Revision?
system, is EPA’s preferred method for special characters, any form of
A. What Action Is EPA Taking?
receiving comments. Once in the encryption, and be free of any defects or
system, select ‘‘quick search,’’ then key viruses. EPA is approving Maine’s Chapter
in the appropriate RME Docket Docket: All documents in the 152, ‘‘Control of Emissions of Volatile
identification number. Follow the on- electronic docket are listed in the Organic Compounds from Consumer
line instructions for submitting Regional Material in EDocket (RME) Products,’’ and incorporating this
comments. index at http://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. regulation into the Maine SIP.
3. E-mail: conroy.dave@epa.gov. Although listed in the index, some
B. What Are the Requirements of
4. Fax: (617) 918–0661. information is not publicly available,
Maine’s New Regulation?
5. Mail: ‘‘RME ID Number R01–OAR– i.e., CBI or other information whose
2005–ME–0004,’’ David Conroy, U.S. disclosure is restricted by statute. Maine’s Chapter 152 includes VOC
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Certain other material, such as content limits for many categories of
New England Regional Office, One copyrighted material, is not placed on consumer products such as deodorants,
Congress Street, Suite 1100 (mail code the Internet and will be publicly hairsprays, and glass cleaners. Certain
CAQ), Boston, MA 02114–2023. available only in hard copy form. products are, however, exempt from
6. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver Publicly available docket materials are these limits. Specifically, the rule
your comments to: David Conroy, Chief, available either electronically in RME or allows the use of innovative products
Air Programs Branch, Office of in hard copy at the Office of Ecosystem exemptions, variances, or alternative
Ecosystem Protection, U.S. Protection, U.S. Environmental control plans provided that they have
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Protection Agency, EPA New England been approved by EPA into the Maine
New England Regional Office, One Regional Office, One Congress Street, SIP. In addition, Chapter 152 includes

VerDate Aug<31>2005 13:23 Oct 21, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\24OCR1.SGM 24OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 204 / Monday, October 24, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 61383

the appropriate testing and when the Agency takes action on that entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
recordkeeping requirements to ensure plan. Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
compliance with the specified rule approves pre-existing requirements
D. What Is the Process for EPA To
standards. Finally, the rule requires under state law and does not impose
Approve This SIP Revision?
compliance with the specified VOC any additional enforceable duty beyond
content limits by May 1, 2005. The EPA is publishing this rule that required by state law, it does not
without prior proposal because the contain any unfunded mandate or
C. Why Is EPA Approving Maine’s Agency views this as a noncontroversial significantly or uniquely affect small
Regulation? amendment and anticipates no adverse governments, as described in the
EPA has evaluated Maine’s Chapter comments. However, in the proposed Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
152 and has found that this regulation rules section of this Federal Register (Pub. L. 104–4).
is consistent with EPA guidance and the publication, EPA is publishing a This rule also does not have tribal
Ozone Transport Commission (OTC) separate document that will serve as the implications because it will not have a
model rule for consumer products. The proposal to approve the SIP revision substantial direct effect on one or more
specific requirements of the regulation should adverse comments be filed. This Indian tribes, on the relationship
and EPA’s evaluation of these action will be effective December 23, between the federal government and
requirements are detailed in a 2005 without further notice unless the Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
memorandum, dated June 16, 2005, EPA receives adverse comments by power and responsibilities between the
entitled ‘‘Technical Support November 23, 2005. federal government and Indian tribes, as
Document—Maine—Consumer Products If the EPA receives such comments, specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
Regulation’’ (TSD). The TSD and then EPA will publish a document FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
Maine’s Chapter 152 are available in the withdrawing the final rule and action also does not have federalism
docket supporting this action. informing the public that the rule will implications because it does not have
The OTC has developed model rules not take effect. All public comments substantial direct effects on the states,
for several VOC source categories and received will then be addressed in a on the relationship between the national
the OTC states, including Maine, have subsequent final rule based on the government and the states, or on the
signed a memorandum of understanding proposed rule. The EPA will not distribution of power and
(MOU) committing to adopt these model institute a second comment period. responsibilities among the various
rules. One of the categories for which a Parties interested in commenting should levels of government, as specified in
model rule has been developed is do so at this time. If no such comments Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
consumer products. (See ‘‘OTC Model are received, the public is advised that August 10, 1999), because it merely
Rule for Consumer Products,’’ issued this rule will be effective on December approves a state rule implementing a
March 28, 2001, revised November 29, 23, 2005 and no further action will be federal standard, and does not alter the
2001, and April 23, 2002.) taken on the proposed rule. Please note relationship or the distribution of power
Several other OTC states have also that if EPA receives adverse comment and responsibilities established in the
recently adopted a consumer products on an amendment, paragraph, or section Clean Air Act. This rule also is not
rule based on the OTC model rule and of this rule and if that provision may be subject to Executive Order 13045
EPA has already approved some of these severed from the remainder of the rule, ‘‘Protection of Children from
states’ rules.1 The emission limits in EPA may adopt as final those provisions Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Maine’s rule are identical to those of the rule that are not the subject of an Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
contained in the OTC model rule. These adverse comment. because it is not economically
emission limits are at least as stringent significant.
III. Final Action In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
as, and in some cases more stringent
EPA is approving Maine’s Chapter role is to approve state choices,
than, EPA’s national consumer products
152, ‘‘Control of Emissions of Volatile provided that they meet the criteria of
rule, ‘‘National Volatile Organic
Organic Compounds from Consumer the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
Compound Emission Standards for
Products,’’ and incorporating this absence of a prior existing requirement
Consumer Products,’’ 40 CFR Part 59,
regulation into the Maine SIP. for the state to use voluntary consensus
Subpart C. Also, Maine’s rule includes
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
additional categories of consumer IV. Statutory and Executive Order
to disapprove a SIP submission for
products that are not included in EPA’s Reviews
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
rule. Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR inconsistent with applicable law for
Maine did not submit its August 27, 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
2004 Chapter 152 SIP submittal to meet not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
any specific control requirements under therefore is not subject to review by the that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. However, Office of Management and Budget. For the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
subsequently, on June 9, 2005, Maine this reason, this action is also not requirements of section 12(d) of the
submitted its 5 percent increment of subject to Executive Order 13211, National Technology Transfer and
progress plan which relies on ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
reductions from Chapter 152. In today’s Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 272 note) do not apply. This rule does
action, EPA is approving Chapter 152 Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May not impose an information collection
because it will strengthen Maine’s SIP. 22, 2001). This action merely approves burden under the provisions of the
EPA will evaluate the reductions Maine state law as meeting federal Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
is claiming from Chapter 152 in its 5 requirements and imposes no additional U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
percent increment of progress plan requirements beyond those imposed by The Congressional Review Act, 5
1 For example, on January 23, 2004, EPA
state law. Accordingly, the U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as added by
approved New York’s consumer products rule (69
Administrator certifies that this rule the Small Business Regulatory
FR 3237), and on December 9, 2003, EPA approved will not have a significant economic Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
Maryland’s consumer products rule (68 FR 68523). impact on a substantial number of small generally provides that before a rule

VerDate Aug<31>2005 13:23 Oct 21, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\24OCR1.SGM 24OCR1
61384 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 204 / Monday, October 24, 2005 / Rules and Regulations

may take effect, the agency within which a petition for judicial Subpart U—Maine
promulgating the rule must submit a review may be filed, and shall not
rule report, which includes a copy of postpone the effectiveness of such rule ■ 2. Section 52.1020 is amended by
the rule, to each House of the Congress or action. This action may not be adding paragraph (c)(57) to read as
and to the Comptroller General of the challenged later in proceedings to follows:
United States. EPA will submit a report enforce its requirements. (See section § 52.1020 Identification of plan.
containing this rule and other required 307(b)(2).)
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. * * * * *
House of Representatives, and the List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 (c) * * *
Comptroller General of the United (57) Revisions to the State
States prior to publication of the rule in Environmental protection, Air Implementation Plan submitted by the
the Federal Register. A major rule pollution control, Incorporation by Maine Department of Environmental
cannot take effect until 60 days after it reference, Ozone, Reporting and Protection on August 27, 2004, and
is published in the Federal Register. recordkeeping requirements, Volatile September 8, 2004.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as organic compounds. (i) Incorporation by reference.
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Dated: September 28, 2005. (A) Chapter 152 of the Maine
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Department of Environmental Protection
Robert W. Varney,
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of Regulations, ‘‘Control of Emissions of
this action must be filed in the United Regional Administrator, EPA New England. Volatile Organic Compounds from
States Court of Appeals for the ■ Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the Consumer Products,’’ effective in the
appropriate circuit by December 23, Code of Federal Regulations is amended State of Maine on September 1, 2004.
2005. Interested parties should as follows: (ii) Additional materials.
comment in response to the proposed (A) Nonregulatory portions of the
rule rather than petition for judicial PART 52—[AMENDED] submittal.
review, unless the objection arises after ■ 3. In § 52.1031, Table 52.1031 is
the comment period allowed for in the ■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 amended by adding a new State citation,
proposal. Filing a petition for continues to read as follows: 152, to read as follows:
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. § 52.1031 EPA-approved Maine
of this rule for the purposes of judicial Regulations.
review nor does it extend the time * * * * *

TABLE 52.1031.—EPA-APPROVED RULES AND REGULATIONS


State Date adopted Date approved Federal Register
Title/subject 52.1020
citation by State by EPA citation

* * * * * * *
152 .............. Control of Emissions of Volatile Or- 8/19/04 10/24/05 [Insert FR citation (c)(57).
ganic Compounds from Con- from published
sumer Products date]

* * * * * * *
Note.—1. The regulations are effective statewide unless stated otherwise in comments section.

[FR Doc. 05–21192 Filed 10–21–05; 8:45 am] SUMMARY: EPA is approving State publish a timely withdrawal of the
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions direct final rule in the Federal Register
submitted by the State of Connecticut. informing the public that the rule will
These revisions incorporate volatile not take effect.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION organic compound (VOC) reasonably
AGENCY available control technology (RACT) ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
state consent orders into the identified by Regional Material in
40 CFR Part 52 Connecticut SIP for four facilities: EDocket (RME) ID Number R01–OAR–
Hitchcock Chair Co., Ltd.; Kimberly 2005–CT–0002 by one of the following
[R01–OAR–2005–CT–0002; A–1–FRL–7967– Clark Corp.; Watson Laboratories, Inc.; methods:
2] and Ross & Roberts, Inc. This action will 1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
have a beneficial effect on air quality by www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
Approval and Promulgation of Air reducing VOC emissions which instructions for submitting comments.
Quality Implementation Plans; contribute to ground-level ozone
Connecticut; VOC RACT Orders for 2. Agency Web site: http://
formation. EPA is taking this action in
Hitchcock Chair Co., Ltd.; Kimberly docket.epa.gov/rmepub/ Regional
accordance with the Clean Air Act
Clark Corp.; Watson Laboratories, Inc.; Material in EDocket (RME), EPA’s
(CAA).
and Ross & Roberts, Inc. electronic public docket and comment
DATES: This direct final rule will be system, is EPA’s preferred method for
AGENCY: Environmental Protection effective December 23, 2005, unless EPA receiving comments. Once in the
Agency (EPA). receives adverse comments by system, select ‘‘quick search,’’ then key
November 23, 2005. If adverse in the appropriate RME Docket
ACTION: Direct final rule.
comments are received, EPA will identification number. Follow the on-

VerDate Aug<31>2005 13:23 Oct 21, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\24OCR1.SGM 24OCR1

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi