Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Results (1) : Are the results clearly presented? Are all relevant connections with
others work/research declared? Is the literature used in support of research
sufficiently comprehensive and current?: 3 (fair)
Results (2) : Do the results sufficiently avoid misinterpretation? Do the results
sufficiently avoid assumptions and speculations?: 3 (fair)
Conclusions: Are the conclusions correctly / logically explained? Do the conclusions
sufficiently avoid misinterpretation? Do the conclusions sufficiently avoid too general or
biased information?: 4 (good)
References : Do the references reflect the latest work/research in the considered
area?? Are the references correctly indicated in the article? Are the references
properly indexed and recorded in the bibliography?: 2 (poor)
Tables: Do the tables correctly indicate units and source measuring ? correctly
named and numbered? Are the data presented correctly valued and interpreted in the
article? Are the tables well proportioned and aesthetically placed in the article?: 3 (fair)
Graphs and figures : Properly illustrate the discussed subject? indicate the measuring
units and the source? correctly named and numbered? Are the data presented in
graphs and figures correctly valued and interpreted in the article?: 2 (poor)
Length of article : Respects the limit of length of article Does not respect the limit of
length of article: 3 (Accepted)
Paper Template : Respects the paper template of ARPN-JEAS Does not respect the
paper template of ARPN-JEAS: 2 (Accepted with minimum changes)
Recommendation for final decision?: 4 (Accepted with major revisions)
----------- REVIEW ----------This papaer descripe the emulsion stability of VCO-Water using tween 80 and SPAN 80 as
emusifier. Experiment shows that VCO using both emulsifier produces stable emulsifier.
The paper is publishabel in ICCE after major revision due to poor English.
1. Reference on the paper is not match with template from ARPN
2. discussion: compare the result with relevant results of other researchs
3. reference is also poor. most of them are research reports in Indonesian. they should
be replaced with papers of international journal
article present in an appropriate way the terminology for its area of interest?: 2 (poor)
Title : Does the title clearly express the content of the article? Is the title suggestive
for the theme proposed by the conference (if there is a proposed theme)?: 3 (fair)
Abstract : Is the abstract sufficiently informative? Does the abstract describe the
research and the results? Does the abstract provide a good perspective on the final
message of the article?: 2 (poor)
Introduction : Does the introduction correctly highlight the current concerns in the
area? Does the introduction specify the research objectives?: 2 (poor)
Methodology: Are the methods used clearly explained? Are the methods used
validated / recognized? Are the data and statistics used reliable?: 3 (fair)
Results (1) : Are the results clearly presented? Are all relevant connections with
others work/research declared? Is the literature used in support of research
sufficiently comprehensive and current?: 2 (poor)
Results (2) : Do the results sufficiently avoid misinterpretation? Do the results
sufficiently avoid assumptions and speculations?: 2 (poor)
Conclusions: Are the conclusions correctly / logically explained? Do the conclusions
sufficiently avoid misinterpretation? Do the conclusions sufficiently avoid too general or
biased information?: 3 (fair)
References : Do the references reflect the latest work/research in the considered
area?? Are the references correctly indicated in the article? Are the references
properly indexed and recorded in the bibliography?: 1 (very poor)
Tables: Do the tables correctly indicate units and source measuring ? correctly
named and numbered? Are the data presented correctly valued and interpreted in the
article? Are the tables well proportioned and aesthetically placed in the article?: 3 (fair)
Graphs and figures : Properly illustrate the discussed subject? indicate the measuring
units and the source? correctly named and numbered? Are the data presented in
graphs and figures correctly valued and interpreted in the article?: 3 (fair)
Length of article : Respects the limit of length of article Does not respect the limit of
length of article: 2 (Accepted with minimum changes)
Paper Template : Respects the paper template of ARPN-JEAS Does not respect the
paper template of ARPN-JEAS: 1 (To be Revised and resubmitted)
Recommendation for final decision?: 2 (To be Revised and resubmitted)
----------- REVIEW ----------1. The English is so poor, there are so many grammatical mistakes. There are so many
sentences that do not make any sense due to poor English
2. The format is not in compliance with ARPN JEAS format.
3. there are so limited data, need to add supporting data. it could be better to make
score of stability and draw in the graphic.
4. Most of references are research reports in Indonesian. Please replace them with
international journal papers, since accepted paper will be published in International
journal. Reference should be cited and recorded in bibliography in the numbered format.
5. authors need to rewrite and have someone to check the English
Hasil (2): Apakah hasil yang cukup menghindari salah tafsir? Apakah hasil
yang cukup menghindari asumsi dan spekulasi ?: 2 (miskin)
Kesimpulan: Apakah kesimpulan benar / logis menjelaskan? Apakah
kesimpulan cukup menghindari salah tafsir? Apakah kesimpulan yang cukup
menghindari informasi terlalu umum atau bias ?: 3 (adil)
Referensi: Apakah referensi mencerminkan terbaru kerja / penelitian di bidang
dianggap ?? Apakah referensi benar ditunjukkan dalam artikel? Apakah
referensi benar diindeks dan dicatat dalam daftar pustaka ?: 1 (sangat miskin)
Tabel: Lakukan tabel benar menunjukkan unit dan sumber pengukuran?
benar nama dan nomor? Apakah data yang disajikan benar dihargai dan
diinterpretasikan dalam artikel? Apakah tabel baik proporsional dan estetis
ditempatkan dalam artikel ?: 3 (adil)
Grafik dan angka: Benar menggambarkan subjek yang dibahas?
menunjukkan unit pengukuran dan sumbernya? benar nama dan nomor?
Apakah data yang disajikan dalam grafik dan angka dengan benar dihargai dan
diinterpretasikan dalam artikel ?: 3 (adil)
Panjang artikel: Menghormati batas panjang artikel Apakah tidak
menghormati batas panjang dari artikel: 2 (Diterima dengan perubahan
minimum)
Template kertas: Menghormati template kertas ARPN-JEAS Tidak
menghormati template kertas ARPN-JEAS: 1 (Untuk Revisi dan dikirim ulang)
Rekomendasi untuk keputusan akhir ?: 2 (Untuk Revisi dan dikirim ulang)