Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 3

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

195 / Tuesday, October 11, 2005 / Notices 59109

number should be included on the change as described in Items I, II, and II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the III below, which Items have been Statement of the Purpose of, and
Commission process and review your prepared by NASD. NASD has Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
comments more efficiently, please use designated the proposed rule change as Change
only one method. The Commission will constituting a stated policy, practice, or In its filing with the Commission,
post all comments on the Commission’s interpretation with respect to the NASD included statements concerning
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ meaning, administration, or the purpose of and basis for the
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the enforcement of an existing rule of the proposed rule change and discussed any
submission, all subsequent self-regulatory organization pursuant to comments it received on the proposed
amendments, all written statements rule change. The text of these statements
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(i) of the Act 3 and
with respect to the proposed rule may be examined at the places specified
Rule 19b–4(f)(1) thereunder,4 which
change that are filed with the in Item IV below. NASD has prepared
Commission, and all written renders the proposal effective upon
filing with the Commission. The summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
communications relating to the and C below, of the most significant
proposed rule change between the Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule aspects of such statements.
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the change from interested persons. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
public in accordance with the Statement of the Purpose of, and
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Statement of the Terms of Substance of Change
available for inspection and copying in
the Proposed Rule Change
the Commission’s Public Reference 1. Purpose
Room. Copies of such filing also will be NASD is filing revisions to the study
available for inspection and copying at Pursuant to Section 15A(g)(3) of the
outline and selection specifications for Act,8 which requires NASD to prescribe
the principal office of the NASD. All the Limited Principal—Registered
comments received will be posted standards of training, experience, and
Options (Series 4) examination competence for persons associated with
without change; the Commission does program.5 The proposed revisions
not edit personal identifying NASD members, NASD has developed
update the material to reflect changes to examinations, and administers
information from submissions. You
the laws, rules, and regulations covered examinations developed by other self-
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All by the examination, as well as modify regulatory organizations (‘‘SROs’’), that
submissions should refer to File the content of the examination program are designed to establish that persons
Number SR–NASD–2005–110 and to track more closely the functional associated with NASD members have
should be submitted on or before workflow of a Series 4 limited principal. attained specified levels of competence
November 1, 2005. NASD is not proposing any textual and knowledge. NASD periodically
changes to the By-Laws, Schedules to reviews the content of the examinations
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated the By-Laws, or Rules of NASD. The to determine whether revisions are
authority.17 revisions that NASD is submitting with necessary or appropriate in view of
Jonathan G. Katz, this filing supersede all prior revisions changes pertaining to the subject matter
Secretary. to the Series 4 examination program covered by the examinations.
submitted by NASD. NASD Rule 1022(f) states that member
[FR Doc. E5–5561 Filed 10–7–05; 8:45 am] firms engaged in, or intending to engage
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P The revised study outline is available in, transactions in security futures or
on NASD’s Web site (http:// put or call options with the public must
www.nasd.com), at NASD, and at the have at least one Registered Options and
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Commission.6 However, NASD has Security Futures Principal. In addition,
COMMISSION omitted the Series 4 selection every individual engaged in the
[Release No. 34–52546; File No. SR–NASD– specifications from this filing and has management of the day-to-day options
2005–109] submitted the specifications under or security futures activities of a firm
separate cover to the Commission with must be registered as a Registered
Self-Regulatory Organizations; a request for confidential treatment Options and Security Futures Principal.
National Association of Securities pursuant to Rule 24b–2 under the Act.7 The Series 4 examination, an industry-
Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and wide examination, qualifies an
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed 3 15 individual to function as a Registered
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(i).
Rule Change Relating to Revisions to 4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(1). Options and Security Futures Principal,
the Series 4 Examination Program 5 NASD also is proposing corresponding revisions
but only for purposes of supervising a
to the Series 4 question bank, but based upon member firm’s options activities.9 The
September 30, 2005. instruction from the Commission staff, NASD is
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the submitting SR–NASD–2005–109 for immediate Series 4 examination tests a candidate’s
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 effectiveness pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(i) of knowledge of options trading generally,
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 the Act and Rule 19b–4(f)(1) thereunder, and is not the industry rules applicable to trading
filing the question bank for Commission review. See of option contracts, and the rules of
notice is hereby given that on letter to Alden S. Adkins, Senior Vice President and
September 13, 2005, the National General Counsel, NASD Regulation, from Belinda
registered clearing agencies for options.
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. Blaine, Associate Director, Division of Market The Series 4 examination covers, among
(‘‘NASD’’) filed with the Securities and Regulation (‘‘Division’’), Commission, dated July
Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or 24, 2000. The question bank is available for 8 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(g)(3).
Commission review. 9A Registered Options and Security Futures
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule 6 Telephone conversation between Mia Zur,
Principal also must complete a firm-element
Attorney, Jan Woo, Attorney, Division, continuing education program that addresses
17 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). Commission, and Afshin Atabaki, Counsel, NASD, security futures and a principal’s responsibilities
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). dated September 23, 2005. for security futures before such person can
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 7 17 CFR 240.24b–2. supervise security futures activities.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:40 Oct 07, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00082 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11OCN1.SGM 11OCN1
59110 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 11, 2005 / Notices

other things, equity options, foreign revisions.11 In the interim, the SROs later than 60 days after Notice of this
currency options, index options, and that share the Series 4 examination filing.
options on government and mortgage- program recommended additional At any time within 60 days of the
backed securities. revisions to the examination program. filing of the proposed rule change, the
The Series 4 examination program is These additional revisions are reflected Commission may summarily abrogate
shared by NASD and the following in the examination material that NASD such rule change if it appears to the
SROs: The American Stock Exchange is submitting with this filing. NASD Commission that such action is
LLC, the Chicago Board Options understands that the other SROs also necessary or appropriate in the public
Exchange, Incorporated, the New York will file with the Commission similar interest, for the protection of investors,
Stock Exchange, Inc., the Pacific proposed rule changes reflecting the or otherwise in furtherance of the
Exchange, Inc., and the Philadelphia revisions to the Series 4 examination purposes of the Act.
Stock Exchange, Inc. program. NASD continues to propose to IV. Solicitation of Comments
A committee of industry implement the revised Series 4
representatives, together with the staff examination program no later than Interested persons are invited to
of NASD and the SROs, recently November 30, 2005. submit written data, views, and
undertook a periodic review of the arguments concerning the foregoing,
Series 4 examination program. As a 2. Statutory Basis including whether the proposed rule
result of this review and as part of an change is consistent with the Act.
NASD believes that the proposed Comments may be submitted by any of
ongoing effort to align the examination revisions to the Series 4 examination
more closely to the supervisory duties of the following methods:
program are consistent with the
a Series 4 limited principal, NASD is provisions of Sections 15A(b)(6) 12 and Electronic Comments
proposing to modify the content of the 15A(g)(3) of the Act,13 which authorize
examination to track the functional • Use the Commission’s Internet
NASD to prescribe standards of training, comment form (http://www.sec.gov/
workflow of a Series 4 limited principal. experience, and competence for persons
More specifically, NASD is proposing to rules/sro.shtml); or
associated with NASD members. • Send an e-mail to rule-
revise the main section headings and
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s comments@sec.gov. Please include File
the number of questions on each section
Statement on Burden on Competition Number SR–NASD–2005–109 on the
of the Series 4 study outline as follows:
subject line.
Options Investment Strategies,
decreased from 35 to 34 questions; NASD does not believe that the Paper Comments
Supervision of Sales Activities and proposed rule change will result in any
burden on competition that is not • Send paper comments in triplicate
Trading Practices, increased from 71 to to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
75 questions; and Supervision of necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. Securities and Exchange Commission,
Employees, Business Conduct, and 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
Recordkeeping and Reporting C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 20549–9303.
Requirements, decreased from 19 to 16 Statement on Comments on the All submissions should refer to File
questions. NASD is further proposing Proposed Rule Change Received From Number SR–NASD–2005–109. This file
revisions to the study outline to reflect Members, Participants or Others number should be included on the
the SEC short sale requirements. The subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
revised examination continues to cover Written comments were neither Commission process and review your
the areas of knowledge required to solicited nor received. comments more efficiently, please use
supervise options activities. only one method. The Commission will
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
NASD proposes these changes to the post all comments on the Commission’s
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
entire content of the Series 4 Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
Commission Action
examination, including the selection rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
specifications and question bank. The The proposed rule change has become submission, all subsequent
number of questions on the Series 4 effective pursuant to Section amendments, all written statements
examination will remain at 125, and 19(b)(3)(A)(i) of the Act 14 and Rule 19b– with respect to the proposed rule
candidates will continue to have three 4(f)(1) thereunder,15 in that the change that are filed with the
hours to complete the exam. Also, each proposed rule change constitutes a Commission, and all written
question will continue to count one stated policy, practice, or interpretation communications relating to the
point, and each candidate must with respect to the meaning, proposed rule change between the
correctly answer 70 percent of the administration, or enforcement of an Commission and any person, other than
questions to receive a passing grade. existing rule of the self-regulatory those that may be withheld from the
On February 9, 2005, NASD filed with organization. NASD proposes to public in accordance with the
the SEC for immediate effectiveness implement the revised Series 4 provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
similar revisions to the Series 4 examination program no later than available for inspection and copying in
examination program.10 NASD November 30, 2005. NASD will the Commission’s Public Reference
originally proposed to implement the announce the implementation date in a Room. Copies of such filing also will be
Series 4 examination program revisions Notice to Members to be published no available for inspection and copying at
no later than April 29, 2005. However, the principal office of the NASD. All
due to administrative issues, NASD 11 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51688 comments received will be posted
delayed until no later than November (May 12, 2005), 70 FR 28970 (May 19, 2005) (to without change; the Commission does
30, 2005 the implementation date of the delay implementation date of revisions to the Series
not edit personal identifying
4 examination program) (SR–NASD–2005–053).
10 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51216
12 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(6). information from submissions. You
(February 16, 2005), 70 FR 8866 (February 23, 2005)
13 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(g)(3). should submit only information that
(relating to revisions to the Series 4 examination 14 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(i). you wish to make available publicly. All
program) (SR–NASD–2005–025). 15 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(1). submissions should refer to File

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:40 Oct 07, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11OCN1.SGM 11OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 11, 2005 / Notices 59111

Number SR–NASD–2005–109 and revisions update the material to reflect necessary or appropriate in view of
should be submitted on or before changes to the laws, rules, and changes pertaining to the subject matter
November 1, 2005. regulations covered by the examination, covered by the examinations.
For the Commission, by the Division of as well as modify the content of the NASD Rule 1022(g) states that
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated examination program to track more member firms may register with NASD
authority.16 closely the functional workflow of a an individual as a General Securities
Jonathan G. Katz, Series 9/10 limited principal. NASD is Sales Supervisor if the individual’s
Secretary. not proposing any textual changes to the supervisory responsibilities in the
[FR Doc. E5–5562 Filed 10–7–05; 8:45 am] By-Laws, Schedules to the By-Laws, or investment banking and securities
Rules of NASD. business are limited to the securities
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
The revised study outline is available sales activities of a member, including
on NASD’s Web site (http:// the training of sales and sales
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE www.nasd.com), at NASD, and at the supervisory personnel and the
COMMISSION Commission.6 However, NASD has maintenance of records of original entry
omitted the Series 9/10 selection and/or ledger accounts of the member
[Release No. 34–52548; File No. SR–NASD– specifications from this filing and has required to be maintained in branch
2005–111] submitted the specifications under offices by SEC recordkeeping rules. A
separate cover to the Commission with General Securities Sales Supervisor is
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
a request for confidential treatment precluded from performing any of the
National Association of Securities
pursuant to Rule 24b–2 under the Act.7 following activities: supervision of the
Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
origination and structuring of
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
underwritings; supervision of market
Rule Change Relating to Revisions to Statement of the Purpose of, and
making commitments; final approval of
the Series 9/10 Examination Program Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
advertisements as these are defined in
Change
September 30, 2005. NASD Rule 2210; supervision of the
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the In its filing with the Commission, custody of firm or customer funds and/
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 NASD included statements concerning or securities for purposes of Rule 15c3–
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 the purpose of and basis for the 3 9 under the Act; or supervision of
notice is hereby given that on proposed rule change and discussed any overall compliance with financial
September 13, 2005, the National comments it received on the proposed responsibility rules for broker-dealers
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. rule change. The text of these statements promulgated pursuant to the provisions
(‘‘NASD’’) filed with the Securities and may be examined at the places specified of the Act. The Series 9/10 examination,
Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or in Item IV below. NASD has prepared an industry-wide examination, qualifies
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, an individual to function as a General
change as described in Items I, II, and and C below, of the most significant Securities Sales Supervisor. The Series
III below, which Items have been aspects of such statements. 9/10 examination tests a candidate’s
prepared by NASD. NASD has A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s knowledge of securities industry rules
designated the proposed rule change as Statement of the Purpose of, and and regulations and certain statutory
constituting a stated policy, practice, or Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule provisions pertinent to the supervision
interpretation with respect to the Change of sales activities.
meaning, administration, or The Series 9/10 examination program
1. Purpose is shared by NASD and the following
enforcement of an existing rule of the
self-regulatory organization pursuant to Pursuant to Section 15A(g)(3) of the SROs: the American Stock Exchange
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(i) of the Act 3 and Act,8 which requires NASD to prescribe LLC, the Chicago Board Options
Rule 19b–4(f)(1) thereunder,4 which standards of training, experience, and Exchange, Incorporated, the Municipal
renders the proposal effective upon competence for persons associated with Securities Rule Making Board, the New
filing with the Commission. The NASD members, NASD has developed York Stock Exchange, Inc., the Pacific
Commission is publishing this notice to examinations, and administers Exchange, Inc., and the Philadelphia
solicit comments on the proposed rule examinations developed by other self- Stock Exchange, Inc.
change from interested persons. regulatory organizations (‘‘SROs’’), that A committee of industry
are designed to establish that persons representatives, together with the staff
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s associated with NASD members have of NASD and the SROs, recently
Statement of the Terms of Substance of attained specified levels of competence undertook a periodic review of the
the Proposed Rule Change and knowledge. NASD periodically Series 9/10 examination program. As a
NASD is filing revisions to the study reviews the content of the examinations result of this review, NASD is proposing
outline and selection specifications for to determine whether revisions are to update the content of the examination
the Limited Principal—General to cover Regulation S–P,10 MSRB Rules
Securities Sales Supervisor (Series 9/10) the Act and Rule 19b–4(f)(1) thereunder, and is not G–37/G–38, SRO research analyst and
examination program.5 The proposed filing the question bank for Commission review. See anti-money laundering rules, municipal
letter to Alden S. Adkins, Senior Vice President and
General Counsel, NASD Regulation, from Belinda fund securities (e.g., 529 college savings
16 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). Blaine, Associate Director, Division of Market plans), and exchange traded funds.
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). Regulation (‘‘Division’’), Commission, dated July NASD is further proposing revisions to
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 24, 2000. The question bank is available for the study outline to reflect the SEC short
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(i). Commission review.
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(1). 6 Telephone conversation between Mia Zur,
sale requirements. In addition, as part of
5 NASD also is proposing corresponding revisions Attorney, Jan Woo, Attorney, Division, an ongoing effort to align the
to the Series 9/10 question bank, but based upon Commission, and Afshin Atabaki, Counsel, NASD,
instruction from the Commission staff, NASD is dated September 23, 2005. 9 17CFR 240.15c3–3.
7 7 17 CFR 240.24b–2.
submitting SR–NASD–2005–111 for immediate 10 17CFR 248.1–18; 17 CFR 248.30; and 17 CFR
effectiveness pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(i) of 8 U.S.C. 78o–3(g)(3). 248, Appendix A.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:40 Oct 07, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00084 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11OCN1.SGM 11OCN1

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi