Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Assignment samples
Introduction
This section provides sample assignments for each of your assessment items. I hope that you
will find them useful. If you have queries or dont understand them please discuss your
troubles with either Jill or Ralph.
Sample 1
Source
Jackson, FM 2002, Considerations for community-based research with African American
women, American Journal of Public Health, April, vol. 92, no. 4, pp.561-5, viewed 12
February 2007, http://www.ajph.org/cgi/content/abstract/92/4/561
Introduction
This review critically reviews the article Considerations for community-based research with
African American women in the journal American Journal of Public Health. The review will
first summarise the article. Secondly, it will briefly analyse the effectiveness of the articles
structure, investigating how the information is set out and whether the reader can access it
efficiently. Thirdly, the review will critique the article, evaluating its authority, currency,
accuracy, objectivity and coverage. The review will also analyse the graph before finally
judging the articles accessibility and credibility. Overall the article was well written, clear
and relevant.
Article summary
The purpose of the article is to explore the need and advantages of conducting community
based research with women of colour in the United States. The authoritative knowledge that
these women can provide about their lives and their health could form the basis of
collaboration between researchers and participants and lead to successful strategies to
improve the health of African American women. The article provides the goals for improving
African American womens health before investigating the issues related to cultural
sensitivity, reciprocity, accountability and authoritative voices in order to argue that the
research on these women and their health must be attuned to the multiple identities the
women possess that are associated with race, gender and class.
Article structure
The article was introduced with an abstract, which provided the stance or thesis developed by
the article as well as a brief overview of main points. The rationales for the article and for the
research it describes were also included. The paragraphs in the body were short and therefore
the information in each paragraph was easy to access, however there were only 3 body
headings, which meant that there was a lot of quite detailed information contained under each
heading. As the article described a research study that was conducted by the author, the
article contained the conventional information normally provided in such a study. For
example there are sections related to the background and significance of the research, a
review of the literature and the methodology as well as the data collection and analysis
techniques used. The findings and conclusions were developed towards the end of the article
however the conclusion was very short, lacking a comprehensive summary of the main points
covered by the article. However the short conclusion did develop future policy and research
directions. References were cited in-text and set out clearly in the literature cited section. The
articles structure was logically developed overall, with the use of short paragraphs helping
the reader access the main points more easily. The article was HMLT rather than a scanned
PDF document and included many links, which helped to make the information accessible.
There were links to author, journal, subjects, citations and references which allow the reader
to evaluate the articles worth more effectively, however linked headings and subheadings
may have allowed the reader to move through the paper more quickly.
Article critique
Authority:
The journal, the American Journal of Public Health, is a publication of the American Public
Health Association, which is an objective unbiased public organisation. It was found on the
scholarly Academic Search Premier through EBSCOhost, which is a highly credible research
database.
The authors credibility was established in a number of ways. These included her PhD; the
fact that the article was a peer reviewed article; the fact that the author is an academic
working at the School of Public Health, Emory University in Atlanta; the fact that the
research described in the article was supported by an ASPH/CDC/ATSDR Cooperative
agreement and a grant from the Ford Foundation; and the links to the authors other articles in
the Reference section.
Accuracy:
The source of the information in the article was a current research project. It was also backed
up and supported by a comprehensive, recent reference list with these sources cited in-text to
support both the literature review and the research itself. The strict editorial and refereeing
processes also contributed to the articles accuracy as did the links to other expert sources
(the journal for example).
Assignment samples
Currency:
The journal was published in April 2002, while the article was accepted for publication in
December 2001. The research it describes was current and the article cites up-to-date
references in the body of the text (ranging from 1990-2001). Therefore the article is current.
Relevance:
This was an academic journal on an academic database, which has high credibility in an
academic context. It was written to inform researchers and students rather than to entertain or
advertise. It would be relevant to both these groups but particularly any academic interested
in nursing innovations and in health generally. It could be a difficult article to read and
understand and therefore would be less relevant to first year nursing students.
Objectivity:
The information was objectively developed, well supported with a current research base and
with all evidence acknowledged and referenced. There was no evidence of bias, a fact that
was reinforced by the recognition that the article documents research, which followed the
rigorous research processes, and the necessary ethical considerations demanded of such
community-funded research. The article acknowledged the complexity of the issues discussed
in a number of ways. For example, the literature review provided explanations of the key
terms discussed (for example gender and identity) and supported their research decisions
with references to the appropriate and relevant literature. The participants were clearly
defined a sample of 545 African American women living in Atlanta - with the findings
relevant to other African American women and would also be able to inform research
conducted in other countries, for example indigenous women in Australia.
Stability:
The article, with its source an academic journal on an academic data base is stable as a
resource.
Analysis of graph
(MAT1008 will help you to write this section)
Conclusion
This review has both summarised and critically reviewed Jacksons article Considerations
for community-based research with African American women. The content, structure,
strengths and limitations of the article were analysed and critiqued. The article has
contributed to the literature in terms of its valuable critique of current research study on
African American women and their health issues and the implications provided for both
health interventions and future research collaborative possibilities.
Sample 2
Source
Bell, RL & Lederman, NG 2003, Understandings of the nature of science and decision
making on science and technology based issues, Science Education, vol.87, no.3, p.352-77,
viewed 15 March 2005, EBSCOhost database Academic Search Premier, item: AN9578033
Introduction
This review critically reviews the article Understandings of the nature of science and
decision making on science and technology based issues by Randy L. Bell and Norman G.
Lederman which appeared in the journal Science Education. The review will firstly
summarise the article. Secondly, it will briefly analyse the effectiveness of the articles
structure, investigating how the information is set out and whether the reader can access it
efficiently. Thirdly, the review will critique the article, evaluating its authority, accuracy,
currency, relevance, objectivity and stability. The review will also analyse the graph before
finally judging the articles accessibility and credibility. Overall the article was well written,
clear and relevant.
Article Summary
The purpose of the article was to investigate whether knowledge of the nature of science
impacted on decision-making regarding science and technology based issues. The article also
determined the factors and reasoning used to reach decisions. The study involved 21 adult
volunteers, selected from university professors and research scientists from across the United
States. The participants completed two open-ended questionnaires and subsequent
interviews. The first questionnaire and follow up interview were designed to assess
participants decision making. Participants were then grouped according to their views on the
nature of science as gauged by the second questionnaire and follow up interview. The
groups overall decision making were then profiled using the responses to the Decision
Making Questionnaires and follow up interviews. After comparison of both group profiles, it
was found that there was little difference in the groups overall decisions, factors influencing
decisions or processes used to reach decisions. Participants in both groups based their
decisions mainly on ethics, personal values or social/political concerns. All considered
scientific evidence but more as a part of a multifaceted issue. The nature of science did not
significantly impact on either groups decision making. These results contrast with basic
assumptions of current science education reform efforts and call for a re-examination of the
goals of nature of science instruction. Future research directions include the relationship
between general epistemologies and decision-making, and the relationship between decision
making and moral development.
Article Structure
The article under review was accessed via EBSCOhost in a clear and well set out form. It
was retrieved as a PDF document. The article was introduced with an abstract that briefly
outlined the purpose of the article, its main points, findings, conclusions, implications and
future research directions. The article is broken into headings and subheadings with
relatively short paragraphs making the information readily accessible. The Introduction
provided background information and the rationale behind the article. This allowed clear
understanding of the context and importance of the study. The body was logically organised
Assignment samples
into scientific headings Method, Results, Discussion and Implications, Appendices and
References. This allowed the reader to read the entire article or just the part of interest. The
article had both qualitative and quantitative aspects with excerpts from interviews and
surveys combined with statistical data from the study. The article was summarised but this
occurred in the Discussion and Implications section in a long and jumbled form making a
clear and concise understanding of the main points difficult. There were extensive references
cited in-text and set out clearly in the References section. The article was a PDF document
which meant it could easily be printed and read. It did not have links throughout the text but
did have links in the citation. The sentences were structured so that an average person could
read most of the article however in some sections the level of literature was advanced. The
overall accessibility of the information was quite good.
Article Critique
Authority
The authors credibility was established in a number of ways. Both authors are associated
with education institutions with Randy L. Bell being an academic at the Curry School of
Education at University of Virginia and Norman G. Lederman is an academic in the
Department of Mathematics and Science Education at Illinois Institute of Technology. The
authors are also recognised in their field with an early version of the article being presented to
the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching in 2000.
The authors have also written a number of other articles, some of which are included in the
References section. The article was from the journal Science Education, which is a reliable
and peer reviewed journal. The article was found through EBSCOhost on the Academic
Search Premier database. This is a highly credible research database. It can be seen that the
article has authority.
Accuracy
The information included in the article was from a study conducted in 1998. The information
is verified and supported with in-text referencing and an extensive list of references. The
editorial and reviewing processes that the article was subject to both contribute to the
accuracy and reliability of the article. The information in the article is therefore accurate and
reliable.
Currency
The study the article is written about was conducted in 1998. The article was written in 2001,
revised in early 2002 and accepted for publication 19 April 2002. It was published in May
2003. The references included in the list of references range from 1963 to 2001. The article
is therefore current and supported by a range of studies over an extensive time frame.
Relevance
The article is from an academic journal and is therefore intended for the scientific
community. It was written to inform and detail specific research conducted by the authors,
not to entertain. The subject is covered well but because it was conducted in the United
States on a limited amount of high level academics, it is not generalisable. The article is very
detailed with the topics being explored in great depth. The material is presented in a logical
and organised way. The article is accordingly relevant to the academic community.
Objectivity
The information presented in the article is from a research study. The results are presented in
an objective way with all evidence and supporting documentation acknowledged. The
authors clearly outline some of the limitations of the research and make reference to
alternative points of view, enhancing the objectivity of the article. The article is based on fact
with all stringent research processes and decisions clearly explained. As a result, the
information presented in the article is objective.
Stability
The article is from an academic journal that is available in both print and electronic forms. It
can also be found on an established and highly credible academic database: EBSCOhosts
Academic Search Premier. For these reasons, the article is stable as a resource.
Analysis of graph
(MAT1008 will help you to write this section)
Conclusion
This review has summarised and critically reviewed Bell and Ledermans article
Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology
based issues. The structure, accessibility, content, strengths and limitations of the article
were analysed and critiqued along with the graph which was included. The authors and
journal are credible, accurate and current. The articles information is accessible, well
structured, relevant and presented in an objective way. The article is also stable as a
resource. The article has therefore contributed valuable information and understanding about
how knowledge of the nature of science influences decision-making on science and
technology based issues.
Sample 3
Source
Cregan, K 2005, Ethical and social issues of embryonic stem cell technology, Internal
Medicine Journal, vol.35, no.2, viewed 15 March 2007, Ethical and social issues of
Assignment samples
information is displayed and the ease with which the reader can access the information. The
article will be critiqued based upon its authority, accuracy, currency, relevance, objectivity
and stability. The review will also analyse the graph before finally judging the articles
accessibility and credibility. Overall the article was well written, clear and relevant.
Article summary
The purpose of this article is to consider the negative implications of embryonic stem cell
technology on an ethical and social level. According to the article, the issues relating to this
controversial topic transcend the religious arguments commonly brought to the fore in such
debates. The use of stem cell technology will lead to the transformation of societys view of
life, causing it to be commercialized and simultaneously devalued. The article does
acknowledge the possible benefits of the technology. However it questions whether such
benefits for a privileged few are worth the commercialization of women living in poverty those most likely to become a source of embryos for such technology. The use of stem cell
technology will have harmful consequences affecting not only these women, but also society
as a whole as the concept of life is reduced to a scientific process.
Article structure
The article was introduced with an abstract that provided an effective overview of the article
by establishing the background to the issue as well as the theme and main points of the piece.
The article itself is qualitative in nature and is two pages long. It is accessible online as a PDF
document. As such, links are not included in the article, but contact details for the author are
provided. In addition, the citation of the article, available through EBSCOhost MegaFILE
Premier does contain links to articles related to key words and subject terms. These links
provided useful background to the topic. Despite the shortness of the article, information is
not easily accessible. There is a logical ordering of points, but the piece lacks headings and
both the paragraphs and the sentences are long, so accessing the information, reading and
understanding the article is not easy. Furthermore, the conclusion is not a summary of the
points made but a question defining the overall theme of the article. There is no in-text
referencing, but three references are provided in a reference section. Additionally, there is a
section acknowledging the piece upon which the article was based. The original piece, coauthored by Kate Cregan and Paul James, Stem-cell alchemy: techno-science and the new
philosophers stone in the Arena Journal includes several in-text references and twenty-one
references in total. Overall therefore, while the abstract is effective and the links provided via
the citation are useful, the structure of the article makes it difficult to read and understand.
Article critique
Authority
The official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of the Royal Australasian College of
Physicians, the Internal Medicine Journal in which the article was featured is an extremely
reputable source. This journal aims to inform and educate, its target audience being the
medical community. In addition the fact that the article was found via EBSCOhosts
Academic Search Premier, which is known to be a reliable database, adds to its credibility, as
does that fact that it is peer reviewed. Furthermore, the author is a research fellow for the
Australian Research Council, as well as an academic at Melbournes RMIT University and
has written numerous other books and articles. The various positions and the contact details
of the author are displayed on the article. All of this information indicates that the article is
highly credible.
Accuracy
The source of much of the information in the article was the original piece upon which the
article was based. While the article itself has only three references and no in-text referencing,
the original, co-authored by Kate Cregan and Paul James contains several in-text references
and a total of twenty-one references, implying great accuracy. The articles accuracy is also
confirmed by the careful scrutiny that it was subjected to by Internal Medicine Journal it
was accepted for publishing nine days after being received. The fact that the article is peer
reviewed also verifies its precision.
Currency
The journal issue containing the article was published in February 2005, while the article was
accepted for publishing in October 2004. Its references date from 2001. The original piece
upon which the article is based was published in 2002, with references dating from 1998.
The recent publication of the article and the recent references indicate that the article is very
current, as does the content of the article which deals with the latest developments in stem
cell technology.
Relevance
The article was published in a medical journal intended to inform the medical community. As
it was written to provide information for an educated sector and published in a reputable
journal, it is relevant to the intended audience. The topic covered is also a significant one in
todays society. The article covers several aspects of the issue, and although the information
originates in Australia, it relates to the global community.
Objectivity:
The information in the article was derived from Doctor Cregans extensive experience in the
area of stem cell technology, associated with the Australian Research Council. The article
shows research decisions, and contains both facts and opinions. However, where opinions are
presented, both sides of the argument are illustrated. The fact that the article considers the
negative implications of embryonic stem cell technology on an ethical and social level does
not lead to bias because the positive possibilities of the technology are also acknowledged.
Limitations of stem cell technology and conversely, the restrictions of not utilizing such
technology are discussed. The majority of the claims and arguments made are supported, if
not in the article, then in the original piece, by references to prior research or literature, and
frequent mention is made of alternative points of view. However, in several instances,
strongly worded assertions are made, and are not supported by documented evidence. The
article serves its purpose as an objective presentation of the negative social and ethical
aspects of stem cell technology to the medical community. However it could have been
written more objectively if emotive and strongly worded statements had not been used or had
been better supported.
Stability
Having been published in a medical journal, and being accessible through a credible and
reliable academic database, the article is a stable resource.
Analysis of graph
(MAT1008 will help you to write this section)
Assignment samples
Conclusion
This review summarised and critically reviewed Cregans article, Ethical and social issues of
embryonic stem cell technology. The content, structure, strengths and limitations of the
article were analysed and critiqued. The article has contributed to a better understanding
amongst the medical community of the disadvantages, both social and ethical of stem cell
technology. Although it lacks an accessible structure and is therefore difficult to read, it is
well researched and highly credible.
Note:
This assessment item carries a weighting of 50%. A mark of 25% is needed to gain 50% which is the minimum
mark required for a pass in this assignment.
Responsible, professional practice requires nurses to understand and apply the professional standards and codes
that influence clinical decision making and the outcomes of health care. This ability is one of the Australian
Nursing and Midwifery Council (ANMC) competencies required for all registered nurses.
This assignment has been designed to help you explore some of the elements of responsible, professional practice.
Scenario:
You are the registered nurse on the floor of an eight bed general ward. The other members of your team are an
enrolled nurse, an unlicensed health care worker (Assistant in Nursing) and a nursing student from the regional
university. A 20 year old patient has been admitted into your ward for treatment of chronic constipation.
Applying the context of the scenario, explore and discuss each of the following elements:
Privacy
Confidentiality
Scope of Practice and delegation of duties
10
Content:
Assignment samples
0-3
4-9-
10-12
Poor presentation/legibility
Needs improvement
in some areas
Sound/good
excellent
presentation in
all areas
Inadequate Introduction
Learning outcomes not clear
in conclusion
Reasonable
expression/spelling/g
rammar
Spelling/grammar/expression
poor
Mark
Meets required
word count
0-3
4-6
7-8
Reasonable attempt
to use
relevant/appropriate
literature
Evidence of
wide reading of
relevant
literature
Appropriate use
of relevant
literature to
support
discussions
Criteria 3
Good-excellent
use of Harvard
referencing (in
text and
reference list
0-10
11-20
21-30
Some elements
discussed well
Good-excellent
discussions of
each element
Fair relationship to
context of practice
evident
Some to fair
development of most
of the element topics
Relationship to
context of
practice clearly
evident in each
discussion
Good-excellent
development of
element topics
Total
/50
11
12
Assignment samples
13
3. Introduction:
Responsible, professional practice requires nurses to understand and apply the professional
standards and codes that influence clinical decision making and the outcomes of health care.
This assignment applies the elements of responsible, professional practice to a nursing teams
treatment of a 20 year old patient with chronic constipation. The elements discussed include
privacy, confidentiality, scope of practice and delegation of duties, law and ethics, infection
control, and professionalism and code of conduct.
4. Body paragraph
Privacy is one of the elements of responsible professional practice that need to be
demonstrated in relation to a nursing teams treatment of a 20 year old patient with chronic
constipation. The team members include an enrolled nurse, an unlicensed health care worker
and a nursing student from the regional university. Kerridge et al. (1998, p.128 cited in
Chiarella 2005, p.405) define privacy as ones ownership of ones body or information about
ones self. Clients would not feel confident in telling their most intimate and private details
if they could not expect that these would be treated confidentially (Chiarella 2005). Thus a
member of the team, for example the nursing student, nursing the 20 year old patient would
need to seek the patients permission before revealing any information the patient had
disclosed to the registered nurse. According to Braunack-Mayer and Mulligan (2003), sharing
information between members of the treating team, or between different treating
practitioners, while a common and necessary practice in the delivery of healthcare, but should
not be conducted without the knowledge of the patient. This would apply in the case of a
young female patient who, according to Rowe (2005), is still an adolescent, suffering a
potentially embarrassing bowel problem. (203 words)
5. Reference List
Sample 2
This sample is developed for the NUR1120 question.
14
Print a copy of the rubric for easy reference throughout the semester
Checklist
This column is for
you to tick off
after you have
completed each
task and pasted it
into your portfolio
PP
2-3
Assignment samples
Criteria 2
6-7
Easter break
8
Criteria 8
10
Criteria 2
Criteria 3
11-14
Checklist
Personal pages
Name
Photograph/self portrait
Table of contents
Introduction
Rationale/purpose/ summary statement
Curriculum vitae
10 marks
15
16
Dr Jill Lawrence
Welcome
My name is Jill Lawrence. I teach and research at the University of Southern Queensland, a regional
and transnational university.
My driving force is making connections: with the diversity of students I teach, with my colleagues and
with wider communities. So, in the spirit of Humanities and the Arts, I draw on the wisdom of others
to make connections with you. The quotations below resonate with me, capturing the essence of my
teaching.
Connections (in my teaching approaches)
Our lives are connected by a thousand invisible threads, and along these sympathetic fibres, our actions run
as causes and return to us as results. Herman Melville
Assignment samples
Criteria 2
Criteria 2
Checklist
Learning journal
University
Nursing program
CMS1008
MAT1008
NSC1500
NUR1120
NUR1140
Communication
Communication technology
Research
Database
Numeracy
Critical thinking
Interpersonal
Learning
Study skills
Team work
Class participation
Others?
Learning approaches
Conceptions of knowledge
Personality
weaknesses
17
18
Reflection 1
Reflection 2
Actions
Resources
Timeline
Reflection
1. Complete
semester 1
and pass all
5 courses
Be positive
Myself
Weeks 1 -17
Develop assessment
schedule
Assessment
schedule
End of week 1
(medium
term goal)
Timetable
Friends/family day
care?
End of week 1
2. Develop
timetable
(short term
goal)
Introduction
Before week 1
Weeks 1-5
Before week 1
Weeks 1-2
Find template
Class information
Weeks 1-2
Organise classes
ALSonline for
strategies to achieve
your goals
Weeks 1-17
Do regular reality
checks (is it working
for you?)
Change if necessary
Assignment samples
19
Expectations
I thought that lecturers would be high
and mighty.
One problem I expected would be the
(negative) communication between
lecturers/tutors and me, backwards and
forwards.
I thought of it as a lot like school,
where you went into a classroom, you
opened your textbooks, and you did this
exercise, blah blah. Very much like
schools.
It wasnt indoctrinated, but it was
drummed into us at grade 12 if you hit
uni, youre not going to be spoon-fed,
and its going to be a whole new world.
So I thought it would be academically
reasonably hardI thought it would be
harder (academically) than it is.
I expected uni to be difficult and time
consuming. I expected that I would
have to work very hard to gain a pass. I
expected to be in a class full of very
capable people.
Its really hard, coming from me, Im
telling you! Like I feel a lot different,
being in my own environment, and
when you come here its totally
differentIm not in control, if thats
the way to put it. I mean Im not an
ego-tripping person like I have to have
total control. Although thats a new
challenge for me, alsobecause in the
18 years Ive been self-employed, Ive
created a lot of personal challenges. But
this is another one that Ive created.
Whether its a monster from the deep,
Im not sure?
Perceptions now
My expectations of university were both
realistic and unrealistic. I expected that
almost all students would have concrete
goals and reasons for studying what they did,
but in reality, a minority had definite goals
and future career plans and most were
undecided and floating. Many were not sure
of why they were at university, possibly
because it was expected and a natural
transition in study, rather than for personal
goal reasons. I noticed that most mature aged
students had definite goals and reasons for
commencing tertiary studies. It may be
because they have given up work and
income in order to commence study, and so
have much more at stake.
With a military background, university is the
total opposite. At university you need to
learn all the norms, which are very
different. Casual wear versus immaculate
uniforms and presentation. Choosing your
own timetable: that was incredible. When I
turned up on the first day, I did not know
where to go or even how to read the
timetable. Organising your study and
assignments, everything is totally up to you
personally, with so much responsibility left
on yourself, when it is totally the opposite in
the military, whereby you must fit into the
group and not be an individual.
I think theres an unwritten rule that youve
got to complain about your teachers.
Everyone has to do that at some point or
another. Things like, they dont know what
theyre talking about, just basically
incompetent. Theres always complaints
about a unit thats just completely irrelevant
or pointless or not effective. Another
unwritten law is not to get to lectures too
early. I chopped and changed when I got
there but I found when I got there fifteen
minutes before there were maybe 2 or 3 of us
in the lecture theatreit gets to five to and
then everyone just piles in. Im really
surprised that a lot of students never ever go
to the computer labs and they dont have
computers at home, they just dont care. Like
when an assignment is handed in, Im out
there every night checking my results to see
if its come in yet. My friends just dont care.
I think if you want to be a student, you dont
20
Nursing
program
CMS1008
MAT1008
Assignment samples
21
NSC1500
NUR1120
NUR1140
Reflection 1
Reflection 2
Communication
22
Communication
technology
Maths
Computing
Assignment samples
23
Critical selfawareness
Participating in
class
Balancing study
24
Criteria 3
Criteria 3
Checklist
Academic journal
Academic
journal
Reflection 1
Reflection 2
Academic
writing
Assignment samples
25
Databases
Assignments
26
Research skills
Criteria 4
Criteria 4
Checklist
Nursing competencies /
standards
Sample template
Nursing
competencies/standards
Professional Practice
1.
Practises in accordance with legislation affecting nursing practice and
health care:
1.1 Complies with relevant legislation and common law
Assignment samples
27
Statement of justification
Evidence summary
Title of evidence
Appendix no
Criteria 5
Criteria 5
Checklist
http://www.usq.edu.au/resources/425.pdf
Graduate
attribute
Core attributes &
capabilities
cluster:
Communication
skills
The more I watch and listen to the lecturers example and case studies and to other
students who are working in Blue Care and in aged care facilities the more I realise
how important communication is. I need to be able to fine tune my communication
to different contexts and purposes as well as be aware that it is a lot more difficult
than I though in terms of potential problems and barriers.
28
The military is very group-orientated, and I think that university is actually very
individualistic and extremely competitive. The military is also competitive,
however if you ignore the group aspect of it, you will not get ahead. Its really all
about teamwork. At university you must have strength within the individual
primarily, although uni students who work in a group are probably at an advantage
if they are in a group and work together as a group. The teamwork at university is
not as efficient as the military, I have noticed in the last 6 months. The attitudes at
university were quite surprising.
Research &
inquiry cluster:
I started wanting to learn and was quite good at it. I also started to change the way
I thought about myself. Going to uni facilitated changes in the way I think and I
now have more of an opinion and can be more of an individual. Uni gives you the
resources to have more of an informed opinion. For example I am no longer
prepared to accept things at face value.
Analytical and
critical thinking
skills
Self-management
cluster:
Self-management
skills
The decision to come to university, though huge, was just the beginning. That
decision has led to a plethora of other decisions, both big and small. I hade to make
decisions about time and stress management, and about how to balance study,
work and the demands of my family. I didnt realise how much support and
organisation was involved. Despite the problems, which I choose to think of as
opportunities to learn, Ive made friends and know where I can get help if I need
to. Ive learnt that university is where I should be and I didnt really believe it
before.
Its got a lot tougher for me. I havent got the support that I thought that I had. So
that made studying a lot more difficultit was a huge disappointment. Been
extremely difficult to keep goingIt comes down to the nitty gritty of how much
work that you need to put in and how much sacrifice you need to make in your
personal life. Others around me didnt comprehend that I was going to be so
involved and have so little time for them.
Ive got the responsibility of a child, in particular an only child, and that is quite
demanding on my time. Im her mum, her best friend, her companion, her guide,
and her discipliner. She is at school in a composite class. I have to keep my
schedule between 9 and 2 to pick her up and run her around, so I lose a lot of
hours. I see it as a barrier compared to a normal student, who has only got
themselves to look after. It makes me prioritise, it makes me organise my life and
the use of my time.
Lifelong learning
There is a Chinese proverb which says that when a teacher is trying to give
knowledge, the student should not present with a full bowl, instead with an empty
bowl and let the teacher pour the knowledge in. Then the student is to sift through
the bowl for what they dont know, and continue this process. Because as a student
if you think you know it all, then you wont learn anything. Learning is an ongoing process.
I think it (university) will change the sort of lifestyle I will be able to enjoy
because I will enjoy greater personal satisfaction and achievement that I wouldnt
have had, had I not attended university. A new attitude of not just learning to get
the degree, but a change of philosophy of thinking and lifestyle including the
understandings that life is continual learning process and that it is important to
keep learning scholastically, academically, vocationally, and in all areas of life,
even after university. University has helped change my way of thinking in making
what I learn personal, part of me, instead of learning something just to get the
grade, and not caring about it once youve got what you want.
Assignment samples
Literacies &
contexts cluster:
Information
literacy
Cultural
29
The Science librarian helped me by going over the search strategies and actually
helping me find articles to use for the CMS1008 assignment. I took the article to
the CMS1008 class, received 10 marks for it and had a reference I used in the
NUR1120 assignment and in the first and second assignments for CMS1008. This
was the start of understanding how important this literacy was in a university
environment. I have learnt how to use the data bases and this has led to my more
effective assignment writing techniques. I also realise it will be skill that I can take
into my professional career and even at home with the kids. It is a lifelong learning
skill.
Theres a more multi-cultural blend amongst the students and staff than I usually
encounter in my normal, everyday activities and life. Thats one of the attractive
sides or appealing sides to me, because of previous experiences with other cultures
visiting Japan on a student exchange I really enjoy and appreciate that.
Im a pretty black and white sort of a fellow and a pretty hard bloke to get along
with but Im trying to broaden my cultural horizons! Its a big learning experience
for me, and I hope that by doing this degree that it changes my perspectives and
my perceptions, and that Ill become more culturally balanced. Im accepting the
cultural changes more now than I was.
University teaches you a different way of thinking. Rather than just accepting
things, you learn to question, you learn to take a broader view of things and be a
bit more broad-minded.
Personal &
professional
responsibilities
cluster:
Personal ethics
Discipline
knowledge &
skills cluster:
Generic discipline
attributes &
capabilities
Im glad that Ive just started, because I sit in classes and I see the people you
can just tell that theyre straight out of school and I wouldnt ever want to do
that. I dont think Id be doing as well if Id started earlierIts an old clich I
now have life experience in terms of reading and communication skills just the
general skills that you pick up from having been in the workforceI think reading
people is a very big part of having successful communicationIf I had have
started when I was finished school, I would have been 16. It was me versus the rest
of the world. I just think that if I had have gotten any negative feedback from a
lecturer or tutor, I would have just thought Oh yeah, crazy old fool, or something
to those effects, that you think when youre 16.
The first few weeks until you get into the rhythm of study are difficult then just
as you achieve the rhythm the assignments all start lining up and your time is
shot. It's an exercise in time management and discipline. I found it hard to turn my
brain off one subject onto the next. I am the type of person that if I don't
understand something it will haunt me and take over my brain until I do. This was
very difficult as some subjects suffered as I tried to master concepts in others. Prereading for me was key if I already knew what I was struggling with I would try
to focus on this in the lecture hoping to "have the lid lifted on the mystery of the
concept" and then I could focus on the tutorial questions and hopefully consolidate
the learning.
Im glad that Ive just started, because I sit in classes and I see the people you
can just tell that theyre straight out of school and I wouldnt ever want to do
that. I dont think Id be doing as well if Id started earlierIts an old clich I
now have life experience in terms of reading and communication skills just the
general skills that you pick up from having been in the workforceI think reading
people is a very big part of having successful communicationIf I had have
started when I was finished school, I would have been 16. It was me versus the rest
of the world. I just think that if I had have gotten any negative feedback from a
lecturer or tutor, I would have just thought Oh yeah, crazy old fool, or something
to those effects, that you think when youre 16.
30
Criteria 6
Criteria 6
Checklist
Appendices
(evidence items)
Criteria 7
Criteria 7
Student feedback/
evaluations
Evaluation reflection week 14 This is a sample written by an enrolled nurse and therefore
not really applicable to your situation. However it does illustrate the kinds of reflections you
can write here. It is 457 words in length.
The experience of preparing a portfolio for me was undoubtedly the most challenging task of my entire
nursing career. Never before has there been on such a grand scale the requirement for nurses to verify
extended clinical knowledge and clinical skills to meet the requirements for extended practice. For this
reason the experience for me merged feelings of gratification with feelings of frustration at various
intervals. I was largely unaware of the process of constructing the evidence, the presentation format and
the time required. Taking the first step and gathering all the required evidence allowed me to realise the
enormity of the task that lay before me. Nevertheless I was keen to strive ahead with it.
I recognise that reflective practice is critical to professional development, particularly when undertaking a
new professional role such as that of a nurse practitioner. Preparing my portfolio was a fantastic tool for
reflective practice. It enabled me to construct and deconstruct evidence and identify areas that I needed to
develop. My professional development during this phase was truly evident and not only could I recognise
this but, importantly, my colleagues could as well.
The time commitment needed to invest in a portfolio cannot be understated. The process of identifying
evidence that can best articulate the recommended standards of the Nurses Board of South Australia
(2006) is challenging and certainly a process by which the Nurses Board can eliminate potential
Assignment samples
31
candidates if it is felt they do not meet the requirements. This ensures consistency in the quality of nurse
practitioners and that adequate support structures are in place from the very beginning. To produce
quality evidence for a portfolio, it is advised that evidence be gathered as soon as you commit to the role
of nurse practitioner. It is certainly not something you can do in a weekend. Due to the infancy of the
position of nurse practitioner, there is time that needs to be devoted to establishing a need for the nurse
practitioner role, defining a scope of practice, setting up policies and procedures relevant to the scope of
practice, seeking avenues for dissemination of information, forming collaborative relationships with other
health professionals and, most importantly, gathering advanced clinical skills that are essential to the role.
I strongly advocate for completion of a Masters degree because this enables compilation of a large body
of evidence over a period of time into a portfolio for submission to the Nurses Board. Preparing my
portfolio enabled me to see the relationship between the core subjects I had successfully completed in my
Masters program and my future role and responsibilities as a nurse practitioner. The portfolio assisted me
in understanding the requirements necessary for making the transition to the challenging role of the nurse
practitioner.
Melissa Curtis RN, South Australia (cited in Andre & Heartfield 2007, p.54)