Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Jed Rembold
September 24, 2009
Contents
1 Survey of Elementary Particles
1.1 Mechanics of a Particle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.2 Mechanics of a System of Particles . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.3 Constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.4 DAlemberts Principle and Lagranges Equations . . . . .
1.5 Velocity Dependent Potentials and Dissipation Functions
1.6 Simple Applications of Lagrangian Formalism . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
5
5
7
11
13
15
15
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
19
19
21
21
24
29
30
31
32
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
CONTENTS
Chapter 1
Mechanics of a Particle
dr
dt
and p = mv
where
p = linear momentum of a particle
m = the mass of a particle
F = total force exerted on the particle
The mechanics or motion of the particle are given by Newtons 2nd Law of Motion:
F =
dp
= p
dt
d
(mv)
dt
dv
d2 r
=m 2
dt
dt
=rF
=N
which is called the moment of force or, more commonly, the torque. Note here that L and N
depend on O, the point about which the moments were taken. Now, if N = L = 0, then L is a
constant, and thus we have Conservation of Angular Momentum.
F ds
dv
v dt
A dt
Z
m B d 2
(v )
=
2 A dt
m 2
2
=
vB vA
2
TB TA
WAB = m
where T = 12 mv 2 is the kinetic energy. Thus we see evidence of the Work-Energy Theorem, which
states that the work done is equal to the change in kinetic energy. Now, if WAB depends only on
the endpoints A and B (i.e. is path independent), then the force responsible is conservative.
Thus we see that, in a conservative system, the work around a closed path is
I
F ds = 0
Remark 1: Dissipative forces such as friction are not conservative since
F ds > 0
for work done by the particle.
For a conservative force (WAB path independent), we can write
F = V (r)
where V is the potential or potential energy. Thus we have
F ds = dV
Fs =
dV
ds
VA + TA = VB + TB
1.2
The goal here is to generalize Newtons 2nd law to a system of particles. Starting with the equation
of motion for the ith particle:
X
(e)
Fji + Fi = p i
j
where
Fji = the internal force on particle i by particle j and
(e)
Fi
= an external force
Now, assuming that Fij = Fji (Newtons 3rd Law, or the Weak Law of Action and Reaction),
then
X
X (e) X
d2 X
Fi = 2
mi ri =
Fi +
Fji
dt
i
i
i
i6=j
| {z }
0
We define R as:
P
P
mi ri
i mi ri
P
R=
= i
M
i mi
where R is the center of mass and M is the total mass. Thus we have that
X (e)
d2
M 2R =
Fi F (e)
dt
i
Consequentally, purely internal forces (forces on particles from other particles) vanish by Newtons
3rd law. The total linear momentum can thus be expressed as
X dri
dR
=M
P =
mi
dt
dt
i
Thus total linear momentum is conserved when the total external forces are equal to zero.
Hence,
X d
dL
= L =
(ri pi )
dt
dt
i
X
=
ri p i
i
(e)
ri Fi
ri Fji
i6=j
but
X
ri Fji =
1
2
i6=j
i6=j
1
2
X
i6=j
(ri rj ) Fji
ri Fji =
i6=j
1
2
rij Fji
i6=j
Note that if Fji is parallel to rij , then rij Fji = 0, which is called the Strong Law of Action and
Reaction. If this is true, then
X
dL X
(e)
rij F ji = N (e)
=
ri Fi + 12
dt
i
i6=j
|
{z
}
0
Thus, if the applied external torque, N (e) , equals 0, then L is constant in time and we have
Conservation of Angular Momentum.
Remark 1: The Strong Law of Action and Reaction requires the internal forces to be central.
We can also describe the particle position with respect to the center of mass:
So we have
ri = R + ri
vi = V + vi
where
dR
= velocity of center of mass
dt
dr
vi = i = velocity about the center of mass
dt
V =
10
Then
L=
ri pi =
R + ri mi V + mi vi
R mi V +
X
i
= R MV +
R mi vi +
| {z }
0
X
i
ri mi vi
ri mi V +
| {z }
0
ri mi vi
Now,
WAB =
XZ
XZ
(e)
Fi
dsi +
XZ
i6=j
Fji si
A
mi v i vi dt
Fi dsi =
XZ
XZ
2
1
2 mi vi
= TB TA
P
with total kinetic energy T = 21 i mi vi2 . We can also write
X
X
T = 12
mi vi2 = 21
mi V + vi V + vi
i
2
1
2MV
mi vi V +
| {z }
i
0
X
2
= 21 M V 2 + 12
mi vi
1
2
mi vi
= KE of CM + KE about CM
We now go back to
WAB =
XZ
i
B
A
(e)
Fi
dsi +
XZ
i6=j
Fji si
B
A
(e)
Fi
dsi =
XZ
i
i Vi dsi =
A
X
i
B
Vi
A
11
1.3. CONSTRAINTS
For conservative internal forces:
Fji = j Vji
where Vji = Vji (|ri rj |) to satisfy the Strong Law of Action and Reaction
= i Vij
= Fij
where there is no implied sum over repeated indices above. Therefore
WAB
B
=
Vi
i
A
B
X
=
Vi
i
A
B
X
=
Vi
i
A
B
X
=
Vi
X
X
i
1
2
XZ
i6=j
1
2
XZ
i6=j
1
2
XZ
i6=j
1
2
XZ
i6=j
B
Vi
1
2
X
i6=j
Fji dsij
A
B
ji Vji dsij
A
B
Vji
A
X
i
Vi
1
2
Vij
i6=j
1.3
Constraints
Constraints limit the motion of a system: ie, beads on a string, ball on a circular track, or gas
molecules in a container.
12
Holonomic Constraints: A Holonomic constraint is one where the constraint can be expressed
as an equation connecting the space and time coordinates of a particle with the form:
f (r1 , r2 , r3 , . . . , rN , t) = 0
2 = 0) and
Examples include rigid bodies (which have equations of the form (ri rj )2 Cij
particles constrained to move on a curve or surface.
Non-Holonomic Constraints: A Non-Holonomic Constraint is one where the constraint can not
be expressed as above. Examples include gas molecules in a box or a particle placed on a
sphere surface (but not stuck to it)
1.4
13
Let
Fi
|{z}
(a)
total force
on ith
particle
= Fi
+
|{z}
applied
forces
fi
|{z}
force of
constraint
(Fi p i ) ri = 0 =
|{z}
infinitesimal
displacement
X
X (a)
(fi p i ) ri
Fi p i ri +
i
fi ri = 0. This is akin to
Fi pi ri = 0 DAlemberts Principle
()
Note that the above equation contains no constraints, so well drop the (a) designation unambiguously in the future.
X ri
i
Fi ri =
where
Qj =
X
i,j
X
i
Fi
qj
Fi
qj
X
ri
qj
Qj qj
qj
j
ri
= the generalized force
qj
14
p i ri =
mi v i
qj
i
i,j
X d
d ri
ri
=
mi v i
qj
mi v i
dt
qj
dt qj
i,j
X ri
dri
= ri +
qk
dt
t
qk
by chain rule
vi
ri
=
qj
qj
Thus:
X
i
vi
vi
mi v i
qj
mi v i
p i ri =
dt
qj
qj
i,j
( "
!#
!)
X d
X
X
2
2
1
1
=
qj
2 mi vi
2 mi vi
dt qj
qj
X d
j
(Fi p i ) ri =
X
j
T
d T
+
Qj
dt qj
qj
qj = 0
with T = i 21 mi vi2 . Now if the system is Holonomic, then it is possible to find qj such that qj is
independent of qk for all j 6= k. Thus, the individual coefficients must vanish:
d T
T
= Qj
dt qj
qj
If Fi = U (conservative force), then
Qj =
X
i
X
ri
ri
dU
dU
d dU
Fi
=
i U
=
=
+
qj
qj
dqj
dqj
dt dqj
i
| {z }
0
where the last term is 0 since we are taking U to be velocity independent. Thus we have
d
(T U )
(T U ) = 0
dt qj
qj
Define the Lagrangian to be L = T U . Thus Lagranges equations become:
L
d L
=0
dt qj
qj
Note that the Lagrangian is not unique! (See HW)
1.5
15
If U = U (qj , qj ), then
U
d
Qj =
+
qj
dt
U
qj
and
L=T U
An example would be a charged particle in an EM field (See HW). If frictional forces are present,
then well have
L
d L
= Qj = forces not arising from a potential
dt qj
qj
Example: Consider Rayleighs dissipation function:
F=
1
2
2
2
2
kx vix
+ ky viy
+ kz viz
And
Ff x =
F
;
vx
Ff = v F
where Ff x is the x component of the frictional force and the sum over i is over all particles.
j (the generalized force due to friction) is
Thus we have that Q
j =
Q
F fi
X
i
1.6
X
ri
ri
=
v F
qj
qj
d
dt
vi
F
v F
=
qj
qj
L
qj
F
L
+
=0
qj
qj
in d-dimensional space
16
xj
qi
= ij
L=T
d L
L
=0
dt xi xi
m
xi = Fxi = 0
So we have that
x = x + l sin
y = l l cos
17
Thus we have:
T = 12 m x 2 + y 2
2
2
1
= 2 m x + l cos + l sin
2
= 12 m x + 2l cos x + l2 cos2 2 + l2 sin2 2
2
= 12 m x + 2l cos x + l2 2
U = mgy = mg (l l cos )
2
L = 12 m x + 2l cos x + l2 2 mgl (1 cos )
Remark 1: Generalized coordinates are not necessarily orthogonal!
d L
L
dt qi qi
L
d
d L
0=0
m
x
+
ml
cos
=
dt x x
dt
d L L
d
ml cos x + ml2 + ml sin x + mgl sin = 0
=
dt
dt
To find the equilibrium points:
U = mgl mgl cos
U
= mgl sin = 0
2U
= mgl cos |=0,
2
= 0,
(
mgl > 0,
=0
=
mgl < 0, =
18
Chapter 2
d
dt q(t)
q+ = q(t+ )
q(t)
is the tangent vector
4. If L(q(t), q(t),
t) dt
S(C) =
t
Note that this is more general than t = time and L = Lagrangian. The above is true of any
function of q, q and t.
5. S is called a functional (a functional is an animal that eats a function and spits out a number).
6. If C C + C, then S S + S continuously
19
20
Example 1: Let n = 2 and well work in 2-d Euclidean space. We have that q = q(x1 , x2 ) and C
is a curve with parameter t.
= lim
t2
t1
N q
X
i=1
N
X
i=1
s
q(ti+1 ) q(ti )
ti+1 ti
2
(ti+1 ti )
2 dt
(q(t))
L(q, q,
t) = L(q)
=
S=l
q2
Example 2: Now well look at a point moving on curve C with velocity v(q) that takes time T to
go from q1 to q2 .
T = lim
t2
t1
n
X
i=1
1
v(q(ti ))
1 p 2
(q)
v(q(t))
p
L(q, q,
t) = L(q, q)
=
q2
v(q)
and
S=T
Example 3: Again, we have a moving particle with time= t and position= q. We can write the
kinetic and potential energy as:
T =
q2
,
2m
U (q)
Thus:
L(q, q,
t) = L(q, q)
= T (q)
U (q)
21
t2
L(q(t), q(t),
t) dt
t1
So S is the Action. Hamiltons principle says that S has a stationary value for the actual
path of motion:
Z t2
L(q, q,
t) dt = 0
S =
t1
2.2
The Brachistochrone Problem: Brachistochrone means short time, so these type of problems
are attempting to minimize the time. A massive particle moves from A to B under the force
2.3
q ( ) = q (q1 (, ), . . . , qn (, ))
22
3.
q ( ) = q( )
q (+ ) = q(+ )
for all
L(q( ), q(
), ) d
S = lim
1
[S(C ) S(C)]
0
Z +
1
= lim
[L(q , q , ) L(q, q,
)] d
0
S = lim
q,i
q
i=1
23
L
L
L q
=
=
q
q q
q
|{z}
Thus
" n
#
1 X L
L
S = lim
i +
i + O(2 ) d
0
qi
qi
i=1
+ Z +
Z + X
n
n
X
d L
L
L
i d +
i
d
i
=
q
q
dt
i
i
i=1
i=1 | i{z }
Z
n
X
L
i=1
qi
d L
i ( ) d
dt qi
= 0 since S is stationary.
Now, applying the fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations:
Lemma: Let f ( ) be continuous for [ , + ] and
Z +
f ( )( ) d = 0
L
d L
= 0 = Euler Equations
qi dt qi
()
24
qi
qk
k
X
k
and
Lik =
L
qi
X L
L
qk
qk
=0
qk qi
t qi
k
X
L
2L
Lik qk =
qi qi
k
2L
qi qk
2L
qk qi
qi
()
symmetric nn matrix
So the Euler-Lagrange equations () are equivalent to n-coupled ODEs of second order for q( ).
Therefore, the initial point of q( ) and initial tangent q(
) completely determine the path.
Remark 5: () has the structure of Newtons Second Law.
Remark 6: Lagranges equations of motion follow naturally from Hamiltons Principle.
Example: Geodesics in d-dimensional Euclidean space: Recall that the length of curve C is
given by
1/2
Z + p
d
X
p
) = q2 = (qj ( ))2
l(C) =
(q(
))2 d = L(q, q,
i
j=1
L
d
d L
=
dt qi qi
dt
q = a = constant
1 1
p 2qi
2 q2
= 0 i
q
pi = constant
q2
q( ) = a + b = straight lines
So the geodesics must run thru 2 points to specify a and b, implying that we require a 2-d
condition.
2.4
t+
L(q, q,
t) dt = 0 =
X
d L
d qi = 0
qi dt qi
i
25
Non-Holonomic constraints imply that the generalized coordinates are not independent. This
implies that displacements of the path may or may not satisfy the constraints. If displacements
satisfy constraints, then the constraints are holonomic. If the displacements do not satisfy the
constraints, then we want to eliminate the constraints by means of Lagrange Multipliers. Lagrange
multipliers work for semi-holonomic constraints, which can be put in the form:
f (q1 , . . . , qn , q1 , . . . , qn ) = 0
()
where = 1, 2, . . . , n.
Remark 1: Semi-holonomic differs from holonomic in that the latter can be expressed in terms of
one constraint equation (function of generalized coordinates only), whereas the former con
be more than one (function of tangents as well).
Remark 2: In terms of path displacements, the semi-holonomic constraints can be expressed:
X
aik dqk + ait dt = 0
where i = 1, . . . , m
k
m
X
f = 0
=1
where
= (q1 , . . . , qn , q1 , . . . , qn , t)
are undetermined functions.
Recall Hamiltons Principle:
which implies
t2
t1
t2
L dt = 0
t1
X L
k
d L
qk dt qk
dt qk = 0
And qk are no longer independent (if we have non-holonomic constraints). But if the constraints
are semi-holonomic, then:
!
Z t2
m
X
f dt = 0
L+
t1
=1
L = L1 ,
m
X
=1
f = L2
{z
26
t2
(L1 + L2 ) dt =
t2
t1
t2
L3 dt = 0
t1
t1
X L3
k
d L3
qi
dt qi
dt qi = 0
d L3 L3
=0
dt qi
qi
Also
d
d L3 L3
=
(L1 + L2 )
(L1 + L2 )
dt qi
qi
dt qi
qi
L1
d
d
L1
+
(L2 )
(L2 )
=
dt qi
qi
dt qi
qi
=0
Now,
d (L2 )
d L1 L1
=
(L2 )
Qi
dt qi
qi
qi
dt qi
d L1 L1
= Qi = forces of constraint
dt qi
qi
with
Qi =
d
(L2 )
(L2 )
qi
dt qi
Remark 4: Lagrange multipliers allow us to map a semi-holonomic system of n-generalized coordinates and m-constraints to a holonomic one with n + m generalized coordinates.
Example:
Constraint:
L = 21 m x 2 + y 2 U (x, y) L1
f (x,
y,
y) = x y + ky = 0 L2
L3 = L1 + L2
and
where k = const
(1)
d L3 L3
=0
dt qi
qi
d
d L3 L3
=
(mx + y)
+
dt x
x
dt
d
d L3 L3
=
(my + x)
+
dt y
y
dt
U
=0
x
U
k = 0
y
(2)
(3)
27
Example: Hoop Rolling without Slipping Down an Inclined Plane: We are using the
r = x
r x = 0
(3)
T = 12 mx 2 + 21 mr 2 2
U = mg(l x) sin
L1 = 21 mx 2 + 12 mr 2 2 mg(l x) sin
L2 = r x
L3 = L1 + L2
= 12 mx 2 + 12 mr 2 2 mg(l x) sin + (r x)
d L3 L3
= m
x mg sin + = 0
dt x
x
d L3 L3
= mr 2 r = 0
dt
m
x = mg sin
= mg sin mr
= mg sin m
x
from (2)
by (3)
(1)
(2)
28
2m
x = mg sin
x
= 12 g sin
So rolling has half the acceleration as the hoop sliding on a frictionless plane!
g
sin
=
2r
=
mg
sin frictional force of constraint
2
d L L
= mR2 + mgR cos = 0
dt
g
= cos
R
U = mgy
L1 = 12 m x 2 + y 2 mgy
x2 + y 2 R 2 = 0 = L 2
which implies
L3 = L1 L2 = 21 m x 2 + y 2 mgy + (x2 + y 2 R2 )
d L3 L3
= m
x 2x = 0
dt x
x
d L3 L3
= m
y + mg 2y = 0
dt y
y
29
x = R sin
y = R cos
2
x
= R cos R sin y = R sin 2 + R cos
Taking m
x = 2x and plugging in x
implies:
m R cos 2 R sin = 2R cos
m 2 m sin
2
2 cos
Taking m
y = mg + 2y:
m
m
m R sin 2 + R cos = mg + 2 2 tan R sin
2
2
2.5
()
30
2.5.1
X L
X L
d
L
L=
qi +
qi +
dt
qi
qi
t
|{z}
i
d L
L
=
dt qj
qj
These imply
X d L
X L
d
L=
qj
qj +
dt
dt qj
qj
i
i
X d L
qj
=
dt
qj
i
"
#
d X L
qj
L =0
dt
qj
qj
L
LH =E
qj
T =
1
2
mj qj2
H=
qi mi qi
1
2
1
2
mi qi2 + U (q)
mi qi2
+ U (q) = T (q)
+ U (q) = total energy
Remark 1: Here we have assumed that U = U (q), so there does not exist dissipative
forces (which dissipate energy).
31
dt qj
qj
qj
Then
X L
X L
L
d
L=
qi +
qi +
dt
qi
qi
t
i
i
X
X L
d L F
L
=
qi
+
qi +
+
dt qi
qi
qi
t
i
i
X F L
X d
L
+
+
qi
qi
=
dt
qi
qi
t
i
| i {z }
=2F by 1.5
L
dH
=
2F
dt
t
for L = L(q, q)
and H = E then this gives the dissipative rate.
2.5.2
This will correspond to space translational invariance. This implies that the Lagrangian is invariant under ri ri + (every particle moves by some same displacement). For now, well only consider shifts in coordinates, not velocities.
L =
X L
X L
ri = 0 =
qi
ri
qi |{z}
i
where () is arbitrary, and only for holonomic constraints. This implies that
d L
L
=0=
qi
dt qi
L
= const
qi
32
pi
L
= canonical (or conjugate) momentum
qi
2.5.3
d T
U
= p i =
Qi
dt qi
qi
pi = Qi = generalized force
= n
L =
X L
X L
ri +
vi = 0
ri
vi
i
Note that
ri = ri
vi = vi
So
L =
L
( ri ) +
( vi )
ri
vi
X L
i
but
assuming = 0
pi =
L
vi
and
L
d
= pi
ri
dt
X d
L =
dt
33
pi ( ri ) + pi ( vi )
X d
(ri pi ) = 0
dt
i
But is arbitrary, so
d X
(ri pi ) = 0
dt
i
Remark 1: The components of angular momentum along any axis (e.g. the z-axis)
are given by
X L
Mz =
where = z
i
i
Example: Well take a look at how this works in cylindrical coordinates:
X
X
Mz =
(ri pi )z =
mi (xi y i yi x i )
i
x = r cos
y = r sin
Mz =
X
i
x = r cos r sin
y = r sin + r cos
i
h
mi ri cos i ri sin i + ri cos i i + ri sin i ri cos i ri sin i i
mi ri2 i
Comparing with
i
X h
X L
1
mi ri2 + ri2 2i + z 2 U (ri , , z)
=
2
i
i
i
i
X
=
mi ri2 i
i
34
Chapter 3
35