Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 15

LING209 Assignment: Literacy in the Workplace

Robert Love

LING209 Assignment (Michaelmas term 2011)


Topic 1: Researching an aspect of literacy in everyday life and how it relates to learning and
education
Literacy in the Workplace: the dog walkers literacy

1. Introduction
This study intends to analyse how reading and writing are used in the workplace. I
will first present a summary of the key literature relating to literacy in general as well as that
of the workplace. I will then introduce the context of my own research and consider some key
methodological issues. This is followed by the main analysis of the literacy practices
observed in a dog walkers workplace. I will then attempt to draw some conclusions based
upon my findings.

2. Literature review
Until recently, the dominant discourse regarding literacy describes a skill or skills
(Brindley 2000: 13), involving competence in reading and writing (Noordman & Vonk 1994:
75). This has been correlated with a view of literacy comprising the basic or functional
elements of reading and writing (Noordman & Vonk 1994: 75; Jackson 2004: 1; Castleton
2001: 58). Literacy has been framed as a discrete ability, divorced from context or purpose
(Ivanic 1998: 62).
As studies have continued, an updated interpretation of literacy has been proposed,
framing literacy as a series of practices (Barton 1994; Ivanic 1998; Barton & Hamilton 2000;
Barton & Hamilton 2005; Barton et al. 2007; Farrell 2009). This view recognises that literacy
is used for a particular purpose and style, in a particular social or physical context (Barton et.
al 2007: 17). This suggests that it is more accurate to speak of literacies (Ivanic 1998: 58),
reflecting the greatly varied (Barton 1994: 188) literate activities (Ivanic 1998: 64) users
1

LING209 Assignment: Literacy in the Workplace

Robert Love

experience in everyday life (Barton 1994: 184). Individual occurrences of literacy practices
are labelled literacy events (Heath 1983: 93, cited in Searle 2002: 19). Furthermore, the
concept of literacy practices is embedded as a subset (Ivanic 1998: 65) within the broader
framework of social practices (Hunter 2004: 4; Barton et al. 2007: 14). This suggests that it is
integrated within these other activities (Barton 1994: 191; Barton et al. 2007: 14).
Indeed, the social practices view of literacy has already been applied to the
workplace. Jackson describes the workplace as a tapestry, within which multiple literacies
are woven to create a working environment (2004: 2). I choose this metaphor to relate, to
the workplace, Barton et al.s wider notion of literacy mediating all aspects of peoples lives
(2007: 66). By viewing literacies as mediators, whereby the application of a literate activity
in the workplace achieves a goal or solves a problem (Farrell 2009: 187), it is expected that
literacy practices are used to facilitate a wide variety of purposes in the workplace (Hunter
2004: 106; Farrell 2009: 192).

3. Context and methodology


My research is based on the literacy practices of Susan (pseudonym), a dog walker at
a small business serving a large north eastern town. I was particularly interested in Susans
literacy practices due to her previous occupation as a teacher at a local middle school. Not
only did she experience learning literacy as a child, but she spent many years teaching it to
others as an adult.
I conducted a semi-formal interview. I obtained informed consent, explaining to
Susan in advance that I was interested in her workplace literacy uses. I conducted the
interview via Skype, and recorded the audio using a sound recording device.

LING209 Assignment: Literacy in the Workplace

Robert Love

I structured the interview on Hunters study of the workplace literacy of a large hotel.
She observes that literacy practices are categorised in a hierarchy (2004: 103) of tiers,
according to the responsibilities of the employees. In brief, these tiers represent:

1. upper management and directors,


2. lower management and floor managers,
3. personal service tier of cleaners, room attendants etc.

(2004: 103).

I adapted these to account for the difference between a large hotel with hundreds of
employees, and a small business of just one employee, representing all three of these tiers. By
asking Susan to describe her practices relative to these tiers, I allowed her to categorise her
literacies.
I asked Susan to provide examples of any written materials that she referred to during
the interview, to accompany my analysis. I then listened to the recording of the interview and
analysed her reported practices in relation to the preliminary research I had undertaken.

4. Analysis
This section presents the main results of the research into Susans literacy practices,
beginning with a consideration of how her views on literacy may affect her uses of literacy.
Susan demonstrated more practices than possible to address thoroughly enough, so following
this is a description of the more interesting workplace literacies, categorised according to the
above hierarchy (a short description of the omitted practices is provided in Appendix: 3
Omitted practices).

4.1 Defining literacy

LING209 Assignment: Literacy in the Workplace

Robert Love

Barton notes that everyone has an interpretation of literacy, and that this guides our
actions in everyday life (1994: 192). Susans definition of literacy extends beyond the skills
view, and much closely resembles the practices view. Her view is concerned with successful
comprehension of meaning:

S: the ability to communicate and understand, whether it is spoken or written word.

Susan, like Jackson, believes that the successful communication of meaning supersedes the
functionality of literacy (2004: 2). As Barton predicts, it appears that this view underlies and
informs (1994: 192) many of Susans workplace literacy actions.

4.2 Literacy practices


Susan uses a large variety of written texts in her work, serving a multitude of
purposes. Consistent with Barton et al.s findings, these uses of reading and writing occur in
variable and specific physical contexts (2007: 17), permeating every aspect of her business:

her home, in between walks,

the homes of her clients, at initial client meetings and when collecting /

dropping off the dogs,


-

on walks, including settings like beaches, parks, forests and lakes,

in her car, travelling to the homes of her clients or walking destinations (she

describes her car as her office).

4.2.1 Promotion and maintenance of image

LING209 Assignment: Literacy in the Workplace

Robert Love

The top level of Hunters hotel hierarchy pins Susan as the upper management, who
create the written texts that consumers (and other employees) receive (2004: 103). Hunter
found that the written texts produced by this tier maintained the uniform image of the
business (2004: 103).

4.2.1.1 Print-based literacy


To promote the business, Susan designed flyers (figure 2) and business cards (figure
3). In this directorial (Hunter 2004: 103) role, she describes in detail how her text-creation
decisions, including the consistency between the flyers and the business cards, categorising
her services and choosing a sans-serif font, were based on what would be clear, concise and
recognisable to the reader. The writer of any written text has to attune the text according to
the needs of the intended reader (Noordman & Vonk 1994: 75), and this is exactly what
Susan has consciously sought to do. A further testament to her aim for consistency is her
universal inclusion of the business logo (figure 3). This is an example of how the identity of
the business has been constructed and maintained by Susans literate practices (Ivanic 1998:
64).

Figure 1: logo, used on all promotional materials including


flyers, business cards, the website, Facebook page and signage
on Susans car

LING209 Assignment: Literacy in the Workplace

Robert Love

Figure 2: promotional flyer (censored for


anonymity).

Figure 3: business card (censored for


anonymity).

4.2.1.2 Web-based literacy


Susan maintains a privately-hosted website, which is accessed by visiting the link
provided on the printed promotional texts. Its design is consistent with the flyers and business
cards, and also features the business logo. The key difference between printed texts and webbased texts is the mutability of web-based texts (McFarlane 2000: 20), edited to reflect the
changing decisions of the text author. Susan describes how the current appearance of the
homepage (figure 4), and indeed of the entire website, is constantly changing to reflect the
6

LING209 Assignment: Literacy in the Workplace

Robert Love

evolution of the business. Bearing in mind her underlying definition of literacy as


comprehension, her literate practice (of writing content for the website) is driven by the
awareness of her audiences literate practice of extracting meaning from her presentation
(McFarlane 2000: 19).

Figure 4: the Wild Rovers website homepage (censored for anonymity).

(See Appendix: 4, Dealing with web-based literacy as a new practice for further
discussion.)

4.2.2 Management
At this level I view Susan as the equivalent of the floor manager, the coordinator of
the service the business provides (Hunter 2004: 103).

4.2.2.1 Existing practices


Susan maintains a diary which acts to keep track of her workload (Hunter 2004: 103).
Her walks are concentrated during the middle of the day (when most of her clients are at

LING209 Assignment: Literacy in the Workplace

Robert Love

work), and she describes how because of this, she has to follow her diary religiously. Her
diary is a textual mediation of her workplace organisation process (Barton et al. 2007: 66).
Susan is well-accustomed to this practice, as she maintained a similar diary in her previous
workplace as a teacher. Because this is a process that has been internalised (Barton and
Hamilton 2000: 14) for some time, Susan is confident in her ability to apply it to her new
workplace. Her confidence is fuelled by her ability to effectively operate in this new literate
setting (Barton 1994: 193-4).

4.2.2.2 Unfamiliar practices


Susans transfer from teaching to dog walking caused a change in the demands of her
literacy practices (Barton 1994: 193) (though, as discussed in 4.2.2.1, this change is not
necessarily great). For Susan, a big change was the introduction of legal documentation (see
Appendix: 4, terms and conditions form provided to clients). Before starting the business she
had never written this style of text, so she sourced a template document from a similar,
national business (similar to Bartons 1994 case study demonstrating learning through
copying; 193). To deal with the lack of confidence caused by, and inhibiting, her capability to
interact with this literacy practice (Barton 1994: 193-4), Susan adapted this text to suit her
own, unique purpose (Farrel 2009: 187). In the process, she animated a global discourse at
a local site (Farrel 2009: 192).
Susan describes how else she learns to interact with unfamiliar literacy practices in
more specific ways (Barton et al. 2007: 16):

S: Until youve done it all once its kind of new at every stage...you do it as you need
to do it.

LING209 Assignment: Literacy in the Workplace

Robert Love

Susan does not attempt to learn the style of the unfamiliar practice in one instance. Rather,
her literacy development is a continuous process (Ivanic 1998: 65), whereby she learns what
is relevant to her immediate needs and, more importantly, the specific purposes and contexts
she is working within (Farrell 2009: 187).

4.2.3 Service
Susan is viewed in the role of service delivery, the provider of the service offered by
the business (Hunter 2004: 103).

4.2.3.1 Literacies to mediate client relationship


Due to the nature of her work, Susan rarely has face-to-face contact with her clients
after their initial meeting. She does, however, maintain regular contact with them, mediated
by the use of written texts (Barton et al. 2007: 66). Each client is given a notebook to which
Susan adds an entry after every walk. Entries are brief and do no more than update the client
on the location of the walk and the dogs well-being (see figure 5).

Figure 5: examples of entries


in a clients walkies book

This practice falls under Susans aim for consistency in her service, and indeed, she relates
the purpose of this practice to her view of literacy as successful communication of meaning:

LING209 Assignment: Literacy in the Workplace

Robert Love

S: All Im doing is passing on relevant information.

Because this literacy event is repeated and integrated (Barton et al. 2007: 14) within the wider
workplace practice of walking the dog, Susan creates a recognisable act (Ivanic 1998: 62)
of writing that is evolved to serve the purpose of communicating within a specific social
relationship (Ivanic 1998: 61). This is a specialised practice (Farrell 2009: 181) that Susan
has developed exclusively for her workplace.

5. Conclusion
This study has attempted to address how literacy is used as part the workplace,
specifically that of a dog walker. I have found that a variety of practices are used, and by
analysing just a few, witnessed how they are bounded by a variety of styles, purposes and
contexts that are specific and unique to the workplace. A lot of these practices are based on
similar, existing practices, drawing upon experiences from earlier in life. When unfamiliar
practices are encountered, they are learnt in a continuous fashion, focussing just on what is
necessary to the immediate context.
I have established how these workplace literacy practices are integrated within wider
workplace practices, especially when they become part of repetitive routine. Furthermore, it
is clear that the most effective uses of literacy in this specific workplace are those intended
for consistency and efficiency for the client.

[1894 words]

References

10

LING209 Assignment: Literacy in the Workplace

Robert Love

Barton, D. (1994) The social impact of literacy. In Verhoeven, L. (ed.) Functional Literacy:
Theoretical Issues and Educational Implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing
Co. Pp.184-97.
Barton, D. & Hamilton, M. (2000) Literacy practices. In Barton, D., Hamilton, M. & Ivanic,
R. (eds.) Situated Literacies: Reading and Writing in Context. London: Routledge. Pp. 7-15.
Barton, D. & Hamilton, M. (2005) Literacy, reification and the dynamics of social
interaction. In Barton, D. & Tusting (eds.) Beyond communities of practice: language, power
and social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 14-35.
Barton, D. & Hamilton, M. (1998) Local Literacies. London: Routledge.
Barton, D., Ivanic, R., Appleby, Y., Hodge, R., and Tusting, K. (2007) Literacy, Lives and
Learning. Abingdon: Routledge.
Brindley, S. (2000) ICT and Literacy. In Gamble, N. and Easingwood, N. (eds.) ICT and
Literacy: Information and Communications Technology, Media, Reading and Writing.
London: Continuum. Pp. 11-18.
Castleton, G. (2001) The role of literacy in peoplee lives: a case study of its use amongst the
homeless in Australia. In Crowther, J., Hamilton, M. and Tett, L. (eds.) Powerful Literacies.
Leicester: National Institute of Adult Continuing Education. Pp. 56-68.
Farrell, L. (2009) Texting the future: work, literacies and economies. In Baynham, M. &
Prinsloo, M. (eds.) The future of literacy studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Pp. 18198.
Heath, S.B. (1983) Ways with Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hunter, J. (2004) Part I, Chapter 3: Working Life and Literacies at the Urban Hotel. In
Belfiore, M. E., Defoe, T.A, Folinsbee, S., Hunter, J. and Jackson, N.S. (2004) Reading
Work: Literacies in the New Workplace. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Pp. 101150.
Ivanic, R. (1998) Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic
Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Jackson, N. (2004) Introduction: Reading Work. In Belfiore, M. E., Defoe, T.A, Folinsbee,
S., Hunter, J. and Jackson, N.S. (2004) Reading Work: Literacies in the New Workplace.
Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Pp. 1-16.
McFarlane, A. (2000) Communicating Meaning Reading and Writing in a Multimedia
World. In Gamble, N. and Easingwood, N. (eds.) ICT and Literacy: Information and
Communications Technology, Media, Reading and Writing. London: Continuum. Pp. 19-24.
Noordman, L. and Vonk, W. (1994) Text processing and its relevance for literacy. In
Verhoeven, L. (ed.) Functional Literacy: Theoretical Issues and Educational Implications.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co. Pp.75-93.
Searle, J. (2002) Situated literacies at work. In International Journal of Educational
Research, 37. Pp. 17-28.

11

LING209 Assignment: Literacy in the Workplace

Robert Love

Web-based data sources


Wild Rovers Pet Services website [Online]. Available at: http://www.wildrovers.co.uk
[Accessed 05 December 2011]

Appendix
1. Ethics procedures: body of the information sheet provided to participant
As part of my Undergraduate studies in the Department of Linguistics and English Language,
I have been asked to carry out a study involving a detailed conversation I would like to have
with you about what role reading and writing play in your work.
I have approached you because I am interested in the importance of reading and writing in
your work, and I would like to learn about how you use reading and writing to do your job. I
would be very grateful if you would agree to take part.
I would like to interview you, via Skype. The interview would take place at a time that suits
you and it will take between 30-60 minutes. If you agree I would like to record our
conversation digitally. I would also be very grateful if you would agree to provide copies of
any texts or documents relating to your uses of reading and writing in your work.
You are free to withdraw from the study at any time. At every stage, your name will remain
confidential. I will not use your real name or make reference to our relation when I write up
my study, however if you agree I would like to use the real name of your business (please
note that this may result in you being identified indirectly). The information you provide will
be kept securely and will be used for academic purposes only. It will primarily be used to for
an oral presentation in one of my undergraduate courses and for the essay I have to write.
If you have any queries about the study, please feel free to contact myself or my course
supervisor, Uta Papen, who can be contacted at u.papen@lancaster.ac.uk or by phone on
01524 593245. You may also contact the Head of Department, Prof. Elena Semino, on 01524
594176.

12

LING209 Assignment: Literacy in the Workplace

Robert Love

2. Ethics procedures: body of the consent form provided to participant


Project title: Literacy in the Workplace: The dog walkers literacy.
1.

I have read and had explained to me by Robert Love the Information Sheet relating to this
project.

2.

I have had explained to me the purposes of the project and what will be required of me, and
any questions have been answered to my satisfaction. I agree to the arrangements described
in the Information Sheet in so far as they relate to my participation.

3.

I understand that my participation is entirely voluntary and that I have the right to withdraw
from the project any time.

4.

I have received a copy of this Consent Form and of the accompanying Information Sheet.
3. Omitted practices
In addition to what is analysed in my study, Susan discusses the following literacy
practices in her interview:

The maintenance of a Facebook page (promotion)

The creation and use of a business plan (management)

The creation and use of a client information sheet (management)

The use of financial documents (management)

The maintenance of a client address book (service)

The use of digital navigation technology (web-based and sat-nav) to find clients
homes (service)

The numerical labelling of clients keys (service)

The maintenance of contact with clients via texting (service)

I omitted these practices mainly because of space limitation. I ensured that the practices I did
choose to analyse shared the characteristics of those I omitted, so that I would not lose key
pieces of analysis (for example, when Susan describes learning as a continuous process, she

13

LING209 Assignment: Literacy in the Workplace

Robert Love

refers to both the legal (analysed) and the financial (omitted) documentation). A larger study
would of course provide opportunity for further, more detailed analysis, perhaps allowing for
the comparison of specific text styles (I refer particularly to the two methods of textually
mediating the client relationship: leaving notes (analysed) and texting (omitted)).

4. Additional findings: dealing with web-based literacy as a new practice


Another difference between Susans use of printed versus web-based texts is that,
whereas she was able to produce the printed texts by drawing upon previous, similar literacy
practices (from her time as a teacher), creating and maintaining a website is a new practice
for her. Therefore she enlists the assistance of her tech-savvy husband to run the website,
typing up and uploading the text that she writes by hand. Susan, as the author, has the ideas
for what she wants to present (McFarlane 2000: 19) on the website, but because she lacks the
required understanding (Brindley 2000: 13) of web-based text production, she opts out of
participating in this stage of the literacy practice of maintaining a website.

14

LING209 Assignment: Literacy in the Workplace

Robert Love

5. Data: terms and conditions form provided to clients


Terms and Conditions
Provider: Wild Rovers
Address: XXX
Day telephone: XXX
I (the Provider) offer a dog-walking service to you (the Customer) on the following terms
.References to Dog are to the Customers dog or dogs described below. This agreement is
made when signed by us.
1.

The Provider will walk the Dog described overleaf for not less than the time and on the days
agreed from the Customers address, unless some other address is shown over. The Provider
reserves the right to walk other dogs at the same time, unless agreed otherwise, but the total
number of dogs walked with one person at one time will not exceed four.

2.

The Provider will walk the Dog on other occasions by arrangement.

3.

The Provider will provide this service personally or will provide a suitable person in the event of
illness or emergency.

4.

The Customer will either ensure that access is given to the Provider to collect the Dog from the
agreed address at the agreed times or give the Provider a key to the place where the Dog is kept.
The Provider will use the key to collect and return the Dog and for no other purpose and will keep it
safe, not let anyone else have it, not copy it and will return it to the Customer on demand.

5.

The Customer will supply suitable collars or harnesses (and, if necessary, muzzles) for the Dog
and any coats or other accessories which the Customer wishes to be used.

6.

The Providers charges are at the rates discussed and are payable at the times set out below.

7.

The Customer will inform the Provider fully of any characteristics of the Dog which needs to be
known for handling and care of the Dog.

8.

The Provider holds insurance in respect of the death, loss or injury of dogs in the Providers care
for a maximum 5000 per dog, to a maximum of 10000 in any one period of insurance, and shall
have no liability to the Customer for any claim in respect of the Dog, except such claim if any as
covered by the insurance and admitted by the insurer. The Customer is responsible for their own
insurance in respect of the Dog.

9.

The Provider will inform the Customer of any incident or anything which the Provider notices about
the Dog, which as dog owners the Customer ought to know.

10. The Provider will keep the Dog on a lead whenever out of the house, unless agreed otherwise with
the Customer, and will take care so far as is practicable both that the Dog is not a nuisance or
danger to anyone, or any other animals, and that no harm comes to it. The Provider will supply
plastic bags use them on all walks to remove the Dogs faeces and ensure that Dog does not foul
any public or private place.
11. The Customer will provide the Provider with details of the Dogs inoculations and contact details of
its vet. In case of need the Provider is authorised to refer the Dog to the named (or in emergency
any other) vet for advice or treatment at the Customers expense. The Customer undertakes to
reimburse to the Provider all expenses incurred under this clause.
12. The Provider will water and feed the dog as advised by the Customer.
13. Either party may terminate this notice by not less than one weeks notice to the
other at the address given in this agreement.

Payment: XXX
Daily for occasional visits or weekly in arrears on Friday of
every week (or) monthly in arrears on the receipt of invoice.

15

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi