Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
productionare.
Theneoclassicaltheoryofproductionattemptstoexplaintherelationship
betweenthefactorsofproductionavailabletoafirm(land,labor,capitaland
entrepreneurship)andtheoutputofthefirm.Underthistheory,firmsarerepresentedas
productionfunctionsthataremainlyfocusedonexplainingthequantitativerelationship
betweenlabor,capitalandthestateoftechnology,whilelandandentrepreneurshipare
usedinamorequalitativemanner.Aproclaimedadvantageofthismodelisthatthe
understandingoftherelationshipbetweencapitalandlaborhasledtothesystemof
massproduction,whichbenefitsproducersbyminimizingthecostsassociatedwith
laborandconsumersduetothelowerpricesderivedfromlowercostsfortheproducer.
Thisrelationshipbetweenlaborandcapitalisessentialalsoindistinguishingbetween
theshortrunandthelongrun,wheretheshortrunistheperiodoftimewhereatleast
onefactorofproductionisfixedandinthelongrunallFOPsarevariableandthestate
oftechnologychanges.Thus,theoreticallyfirmscandistinguishbetweentheshortrun
andthelongrunandmakenecessaryadjustmentsinbothbycontrollingthenumberof
workershired(shortrun)andbyscalingthesizeofthefirm(longrun).
Asstated,thistheoryofproductionishighlydependentonexplainingthe
relationshipbetweenlaborandcapital.Althoughneoclassicaleconomistswouldargue
thatthesetwoFOPsareinterchangeablyfixableintheshortrun,inrealitychanging
laborismucheasierthanchangingcapital.Moreover,aspracticeshows,itisextremely
difficulttomeasuretheproductivityofasingleemployee,letalonemeasurehowthis
productivityincreasesordecreasesasonemoreworkerisadded.Inprinciple,thetoo
manycooksinthekitchenprincipleofdiminishingreturnstolabormightbelogically
coherentunderneoclassicalassumptions,butinrealityitdoesaverypoorjob
explainingtheeffectsofexternalinfluencesonlabor,suchasmanagementandsocial
values.Thistheorywouldhaveitthattheproductivityofeverylaborerissomewhat
intrinsic,whichcanbethoughtasthemaximumphysicalorintellectualcapacityofa
laborertocarryoutatask.However,workersrarelyapproachthislimitandevenifthey
areforcedto,alawsuitmightbependingonthecompany.Again,neoclassicaltheory
doesnotexplaintheroleandeffectoflegalandsociallimitations.
Inthe21stcenturyitseemsparticularlyludicroustodependentonatheorythat
doesnotaccountforexogenousfactorssuchasmanagement.Byholdingthat
productivityisdependentontheworkerscharacteristicstherelationshipbetweenlabor
andmanagementbecomessomewhatantagonistic,becausemanagementisviewedas
theforcethatguaranteesthatworkersreachtheirlevelsofproductivity.Inreality,any
respectableenterprisecreatesbridgesofcooperationbetweenmanagementand
workers.Infactoneofthebiggestdiseconomiesofscalethatfirmshavetodealwithas
theyexpandisthecomplexityofcreatingbiggercommunicationnetworks.These
diseconomiesareonlysolvedbycreatingcommunicationnetworksthatpromote
cooperationbetweenmanagementandworkers.
Appendix
Contemporarypracticesofproductionprovideamyriadofexamplesthatarecounterto
manyoftheconclusionsthattheneoclassicaltheoryofproductionposits.Asan
examplewecanlookatthemanyfirmsthatreduceworkhours,increasebenefitssuch
asvacationtimeandliftrestrictionsintheworkplaceallthewhileleadingtooverthe
boardincreasesinproductivity.AlsotheToyotamanufacturingmodelhaschallenged
manyoftheworkplacepracticesestablishedbytheFordmodel,especiallyhowthe
productionlineisoperated.Formoreonthelastexample,thislinkisagreatresource:
http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radioarchives/episode/561/nummi2015