Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
39015021567436
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#cc-by-nc-sa-4.0
BY
MARGARET THOMPSON
NUMISMATIC STUDIES
No. 19
NEW YORK
1991
NUMISMATIC STUDIES
No. 19
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Abbreviations
Introduction 9
Lampsacus
Attribution 11
Chronology 38
Abydus
Attribution 41
Chronology 63
Hoards
Alphabetical Listing 67
Gold 67
Silver 71
Hoard Chart 77
ABBREVIATIONS
ANSMN 10
Demanhur
Hirsch
Hunter
IGCH
McClean
Poenaru Bordea
Pridik
Reattrib.
SNG
SNGAshm
SNGBerry
SNGCop
SNGDavis
SNGDelepierre
SNGFitz
SNGLewis
SNGLockell
SNGSwed
Weber
YCS 14
Sydney P. Noe, "The Corinth Hoard of 1938," ANSMN 10 (1962), pp. 9-41
Paul Naster, La Collection Lucien de Hirsch: Catalogue des monaies grecques (Brussels,
1959)
1899)
York, 1973)
1923-29)
Gh. Poenaru Bordea, "Le Tresor de Mar&sesti," Dacia 18 (1974), pp. 103-25
Eugen Pridik, "Anadol'skii klad zolotykh staterov 1895 goda" [Gold staters found at
1912)
Margaret Thompson, Alexander's Drachm Mints I: Sardis and Miletus, ANSNS 16 (New
York, 1983)
SNG [Great Britain], vol. 5, pt. 2, Ashmolean Museum Oxford (London, 1969)
SNG: The Royal Collection of Coins and Medals, Danish National Museum (Copenhagen,
1955)
SNG [Great Britain], vol. 1, pt. 2, The Newnham Davis Coins in the Wilson Collection of
SNG [Great Britain], vol. 4, Fitzwilliam Museum: Leake and General Collections (London,
1967)
SNG [Great Britain], vol. 6, The Lewis Collection in Corpus Christi College, Cambridge
(London, 1972)
SNG [Great Britain\, vol.3, The Lockett Collection, pt. 3, Macedonia-Aegina (London,
1942)
Margaret Thompson and Alfred B. Bellinger, "Greek Coins in the Yale Collection, 4: A
Hoard of Alexander Drachms," Yale Classical Studies 14 (1955), pp. 32-34 and pis. [1-3],
1-26.
INTRODUCTION
Under Alexander and his successors down to the end of the fourth century, seven mints in Asia
Minor produced the small change of the entire empire, their very substantial emissions of
drachms supplemented at time by much smaller issues of tetradrachms.1 This pattern is in sharp
contrast to that prevailing elsewhere. At all other mints the principal denomination was the
tetradrachm; drachms were rarely struck and then only in minor quantity. The reasons for this
distinction in the kind of money produced by various mints are no more evident now than they
were in earlier studies. As a regional distinction it conforms to the traditions of the pre-
Alexandrine period when the basic unit of exchange for much of Asia Minor was a small silver
coin, the Persian siglos or the autonomous drachm, while Macedonia, Cilicia and lands further
south and east relied on a large silver coin, the tetradrachm or the shekel. Whether the pattern
was set by royal decree or by local authority is a question that cannot be definitively answered
but the fact that it endured well after Alexander's death attests its efficacy.
In addition to small silver, the seven mints produced a surprisingly extensive gold coinage:
staters of Alexander and Philip III and posthumous issues of Philip II. The figures are truly
impressive. Lampsacus, for example, used over 100 obverse dies for her gold emissions, a total
which far surpasses that of the average tetradrachm mint and approaches or even slightly
exceeds the output of such major workshops as Amphipolis and Babylon. When the final tally is
available, we may find that most of the gold coinage of 330-300 B.C. came from Asia Minor.
The drachm mints under present discussion have been identified as Lampsacus, Abydus,
Sardes, Colophon, Magnesia, Miletus and probably Teos. In general the attributions are those of
Edward T. Newell but his trays and notes rarely offer any clue as to the basis of his judgment.
As is true of the bulk of Alexander's coinage, the earlier Asia Minor issues employ symbols and
monograms which are moneyers' marks without civic connotation. They may serve to bring
together separate strikings but they are of no real help in determining the location of the mint.
Toward the end of the century the situation changes. Lysimachus gains control of northwestern
Asia Minor and of the mints which had been coining for Antigonus. As one would logically
expect, he keeps them in operation for the production of his own money. Often the same
symbols and monograms carry over from Antigonus's final issues to the Alexandrine coins of
Lysimachus and then to the latter's own regnal strikings. Some of these symbols now have civic
significance and thus confirm the attribution of the series as a whole. Not all mints can be
located with the same degree of certainty, but there is more evidence for attribution than might
Although all seven mints adhere to the basic pattern of monetary production, there are
noteworthy variations in the type and quantity of coinage put out and in the chronological span
of minting activity. Miletus and Sardes are more or less disparate workshops and were combined
in the earlier study for the sake of convenience. They initiated these studies not because they
are the most important of the mints but because their chronologies are comparatively tight and
their coinages have a number of unusual features. Lampsacus and Abydus, the subjects of this
study, are linked in terms of geography and to some extent style; while the three Ionian mints
Throughout the catalogues it is to be understood that the coins, unless otherwise indicated, are
the standard gold, silver, and bronze types issued in the names of Philip II, Alexander III or IV,
1 This introduction is reproduced from the foreword to Sardis and Miletus with appropriate emendations.
10
Introduction
and Philip III. This is not a corpus in the sense that all available public and private collections
have been culled for material; the numerous coins, casts and photo file cards at the ANS provide
adequate evidence for the chronological sequence and the relative size of the individual issues.
That the record is incomplete with respect to the drachms is clear from the fact that so many die
combinations are known from only one example. Obviously a great many more drachm dies
were originally employed but even prolonged search is unlikely to give the full story. While the
reverses of the gold and the tetradrachms, as well as the smaller drachm issues, have been
checked for die linkage to establish the sequence of emission, only cursory attention has been
paid to reverse transfers within the large drachm issues since ascertaining the exact order in
which the obverse dies were used does not seem worth the labor involved. Illustration (as
indicated by asterisks before catalogue entries) is also less comprehensive for the drachms than
for other sections of the coinage. All recorded gold and tetradrachm obverses are shown on the
plates but in some instances drachm dies have not been reproduced if they are similar in style to
illustrated examples. The numerous hoards, cited parenthetically after individual entries, are
identified and discussed in the section on Hoards which concludes the study.
LAMPSACUS
ATTRIBUTION
The coinage here attributed to Lampsacus follows closely the arrangement in an unpublished
manuscript of Edward T. Newell in which he outlined the Alexandrine output of that mint.
There is a drastic shift in the position of one series and the chronology has been modified to some
extent; these alterations will be noted in the relevant commentaries. Otherwise the catalogue
reflects Newell's preliminary thoughts on the Lampsacene coinage from the time of Alexander to
that of Lysimachus.
That the mint was Lampsacus is basically attested by the large issue with Pegasus forepart,
the badge of the city, as its major control. This comes, however, at the end of the sequence. The
association of preceding issues rests largely upon stylistic criteria and the recurrence of
secondary controls. There is die linkage between series but unfortunately not nearly as much as
As Newell notes, Lampsacus had long been an active mint, as witness its extensive
played a vital role in Alexander's new empire, for the cities bordering on it provided the commu-
nicating lines between Asia and the home base of Macedon. Maintenance of the necessary
garrisons to counter threats from the Persian satraps would have entailed considerable expense
and it must have eventually become apparent that opening a royal mint in that region was a
practical measure. Lampsacus with its long tradition of coinage, its supply of skilled workmen
Tetradrachms
Drachm
Tetradrachms
! To the best of my knowledge this unusual rendering of a caduceus is otherwise unknown in hellenistic art.
11
12
Drachms
c. ANS, 3.79|
7. *Berlin
Drachms
b. ANS, 4.22|
Drachms
Bronze
Rev. below, E
20. *London
21. *Athens
Series V. Control: *
Tetradrachms
8 In Newell's manuscript the goddess is tentatively identified as Hecate but there seems to have been no
4 On a few dies, throughout, the back of a throne is indicated. For the most part the god sits on a simple
stool.
Lampsacus
13
b. *ANS, 17.13|
c. ANS, 17.16*-
29a. *ANS, 17.22 \; Met. Mus. of Art, 16.74 \; Munz. u. Med. FPL 247, Sept. 1964, 4, 17.16
b. ANS, 17.211
c. ANS, 17.19|
d. ANS, 17.01/
d. ANS, 17.20/
e. ANS, 16.98/
32a. *ANS = J. N. Svoronos, "Sylloge Elenes N. Mavrogordatou," J IAN 1911, 286, 17.18-;
33. *ANS (Demanhur), Reattrib., pi. 17, 8, 17.36/; Seltman Coll., 17.20; commerce (Cairo, ca.
1955)
36a. Rev. die of 35. Hirsch 30, May 11, 1911, 464, 17.20
c. London
37a. *ANS, 17.21/; ANS (Demanhur), Reattrib., pi. 17, 9, 17.18-; ANS, 17.19<-
38a. Rev. of 37c. May Coll. (Demanhur), 17.01 \; ANS, 17.10|; Egger 40, May 2, 1912 (Prowe),
620, 17.05; Munz. u. Med. 13, June 17, 1954, 1104, 17.19
c. ANS, 17.15-
e. Petsalis Coll.
g. ANS, 17.14<-
39a. *McClean 3427, 17.36->; ANS, 16.77*-; ANS, 17.08\; ANS, 17.16^; ANS, 17.08\
b. ANS, 17.061
II
c. Obv. die recut. Rev. of 38g. Grabow 14, July 27, 1939, 246 = Ball 39, Apr. 1937, 288,
16.50
40a. *ANS (Demanhur), Reattrib., pi. 17, 10, 17.111; ANS, 17.18,/; Draper Coll., 17.24; Naville
b. ANS, 17.17|
c. ANS, 15.83 [sic]\; Oman Coll.; Coin Galleries, Apr. 20, 1961, 83
d. ANS (Abu Hommos), 17.201; ANS (Demanhur), 17.01->; Naville 6, Jan. 28, 1924
Drachms
b. Rev. no monogram. Athens (Corinth 1938); ANSMN 10, p. 15, 162, 3.91
b. ANS, 4.22<-
62. Rev. below, A. *ANS (Sinan), 4.23|; commerce (Asia Minor 1964)
Lampsacus
15
c. ANS, 3.98<-
b. Munich
80. Rev. of 79. *ANS (Sinan), 4.321; Hersh Coll., 4.321; ANS (Sinan), 4.32-
Quarter Staters
83. *SNGBerry 147, 2.15-; ANS = Naville 13, June 27, 1928, 516, 2.15\
Half Stater
Staters
85a. *Berlin = Hamburger, June 11, 1930, 28, 8.58; The Hague|; Kosoff, ANA Conv., Aug. 22,
89. Burgas Museum (Jasna Poljana), Sardes and Miletus, p. 74, 16, and pi. 33
b. Florence
16
b. Obv. die recut. *ANS, 8.491; R. Ratto, Oct. 9, 1934, 104 = R. Ratto, June 24, 1929, 249,
8.51
98a. *SNGLewis 501, 8.48|; Cahn 66, May 6, 1930, 185, 8.66; Cahn FPL 31, 1934, 137
b. Basel Munzhandlung 10, March 15, 1938, 203 = Hirsch 32, Nov. 14, 1912, 455, 8.60;
b. Volos
101. *H. Schulman, Feb. 16, 1961, 1655, 8.54 \; Leningrad, 8.50 S; commerce (N. Greece),
b. Leningrad, 8.58|
c. Commerce (N. Greece), 8.47; Sotheby, Apr. 16, 1969, 261 (Paeonia), 8.55|
106a. *Naville_16, July 3, 1933, 1026 = Naville 13, June 27, 1928, 510), 8.60; Kishinev
(Lergutsa)
b. Hess 208, Dec. 14, 1931, 266, 8.46; Sofia (Malko Topolovo)
107. *Weber 2075 = Ratto, Apr. 4, 1927, 571 = Sotheby, Feb. 12, 1923, 25, 8.54
Philip II Staters
b. *Berlin
c. Naville 5, June 18, 1923, 1360 = Hirsch 32, Nov. 14, 1912, 447, 8.50; commerce 1921,
112a. Rev. of 110c. London; Naville 16, July 3, 1933, 1014, 8.57
b. *Berlin
b. Munich
114a. *Cahn 84, Nov. 29, 1933, 239 = Naville 13, June 27, 1928, 476, 8.53; Coin Galleries FPL
22, Dec. 1959, 601 = Coin Galleries FPL 16, Dec. 1958, 208
b. Glendining, Mar. 7, 1957, 10, 8.55; Naville 13, June 27, 1928, 475, 8.57
115a. ""London
Lampsacus
17
116a. A. W. Thompson Coll.; Miinz. u. Med. 19, June 5, 1959, 388, 8.55; commerce (N. Greece),
8.55
c. Paris; Dewing Coll., 8.50; H. Miller Coll. = Naville 17, Oct. 3, 1934, 346 = Helbing, Jan.
31, 1930, 182 = Naville 14, July 2, 1929, 195 = Hamburger, Sept. 12, 1922, 18 =
Serrure, Mar. 30, 1914, 46, 8.50; Schlessinger 13, Feb. 4, 1935, 624 = Naville 17, Oct. 3,
1934, 347, 8.52; Ratto, May 13, 1912, 609, 8.55; Dupriez, Apr. 7, 1913, 93; Schlessinger,
e. *Vatican; Vienna, 8.55; Bourgey, Dec. 5, 1932, 130; Kress, Oct. 28, 1960, 289; Canessa,
June 28, 1923, 27 = Hirsch 30, May 11, 1911, 455 = Sotheby, May 4, 1908, 278, 8.55;
118a. Rev. of 116e. SNGCop 532, 8.46 S; Glendining, May 27, 1936, 37, 8.55
b. Rev. of 116d. Berlin; SNGBerry 96, 8.53->; Schlessinger, Feb. 1, 1939, 616
c. Hunter, p. 288, 12, 8.56; Rollin and Feuardent, May 9, 1910, 321
b. ANS, 8.56->
121. Obv. of 119. *Leningrad, 8.41; Glendining, May 27, 1936, 32, 8.50
122a. Rev. of 121. *Berry Coll. = Hess-Leu 28, May 5, 1965, 149, 8.54
b. Munich = Helbing, Mar. 22, 1926, 80; Berlin; commerce (N. Greece), 8.56
124. ""London
c. Vienna, 8.47
126a. Rev. of 124. London; The Hague; Hess 208, Dec. 14, 1931, 247, 8.56; Kishinev (Lergutsa)
c. Rev. of 125c. *Florange, May 28, 1924, 14, 8.60; Hirsch 33, Nov. 17, 1913, 636; London;
Drachms
Rev. to l., A1
127. Obv. of 82. *Hersh Coll. (Asia Minor 1964), 4.29|; Miinz. u. Med. FPL 247, Sept. 1964, 6
128a. Rev. /R cut over Demeter, * erased below stool. *ANS (Sinan), 4.31 <-
b. London
c. ANS, 4.08<-
18
d. ANS, 4.13|
c. Gotha; London
b. London
a. *ANS, 4.19|
b. London
Philip II Staters
154. Obv. of Abydus 101. Rev. of 153. *Hess-Leu 15, Apr. 7, 1960, 140, 8.62
155a. ANS = Hirsch 18, May 27, 1907, 2328, 8.57-; London; Istanbul
b. *Berlin
157. Rev. of 155b. *Munich = Hamburger 95, 370; Glendining, Mar. 9, 1931, 995, 8.551
Lampsacus
19
Drachms
b. ANS, 3.95-
Philip II Staters
166. Obv. of 158. Rev. of 165. *ANS = Hirsch 18, May 27, 1907^2329, 8.591
Drachms
Philip II Staters
172. 'Berlin
Staters
175a. Rev. of 174. *Schlessinger 13, Feb. 4, 1935, 743 (Anadol), Pridik 9, 8.50; Florence; Hess-
176a. Miinz. u. Med. 41, June 18, 1970, 90, 8.59; Vinchon, Oct. 26, 1964, 4 = Piatt FPL, Coll. C
(n. d.), 11 = Naville 12, Oct. 18, 1926 (Bisson), 1173, 8.58
b. ANS = Dupriez, Nov. 4, 1912, 1352, 8.591; Piatt FPL, Coll. H. H. (n. d.), 28
c. Rev. ^. *ANS = Egger 45, Nov. 12, 1913, 491 = Hirsch 32, Nov. 14, 1912, 462, 8.60 \;
Paris
20
180. *London
a. Rev. of 179b. ""Ciani-Vinchon, May 6, 1955, 206 = Ciani, Apr. 7, 1930, 29, 8.44
182a. *SNGDelepierre97\ = Ratto, Apr. 4, 1927, 703 = Ratto FPL, Dec. 1922, 1990 = Naville
c. Rev. X; below wing, A. Canessa, June 28, 1923, 56, 8.52; Sofia (Malko Topolovo)
c. Rev. X; below wing, A. Cahn 66, May 6, 1930, 194 = Ratto, Feb. 8, 1928, 308, 8.59
185. Rev. of 184b. ""Miinz. u. Med. FPL 247, Sept. 1964, 7 (Asia Minor 1964), 8.59
188. Rev. of 187. *ANS (Marasesti), Poenaru Bordea 22, 8.531; commerce (N. Greece), 8.53
192. *ANS, 8.55 \; Hunter, p. 332, 4, 8.54; Santamaria, Jan. 24, 1938, 149, 8.50
195a. Rev. of 194b. *Leningrad; Rucharest cast (Marasesti), Poenaru Bordea 23, 8.54 \
b. ""Leningrad; commerce 1921 (Marasesti), Poenaru Bordea 24; commerce (N. Greece), 8.62
199. *ANS, 8.40->; Leningrad; Cahn 75, May 30, 1932, 281, 8.58
Rev. to l., X
201. *Paris
202. Rev. *. ""Schlessinger 13, Feb. 4, 1935, 660 (Anadol), Pridik 228, 8.50
Lampsacus
21
Drachms
205a. Rev. to l., -f above . ANS, 4.15->; J. N. Svoronos, "Sylloge Elenes N. Mavrogordatou"
c. ANS, 4.19
d. Stockholm, 4.22|
c. Turin, 3.93<-
b. Bettermann Coll.
b. Oberlin, 3.94
b. ANS, 4.13
228a. Leningrad
b. Rev. X. Cahn 84, Nov. 29, 1933, 256 (misnumbered on plate), 4.13
22
b. Rome, Museo Nazionale delle Terme; Athens (Corinth 1938), ANSMN 10, 166, 4.05
b. Dresden, 4.23
b. ANS, 4.11-
251. Leningrad
b. ANS, 3.98|
Lampsacus
23
b. ANS, 4.26-
270. *Munich
Rev. to l., X
a. ANS, 3.871
275. Obv. of 272. *ANS, 4.23|; ANS (ctmk: prow and rTY), 4.12
b. *ANS, 4.28 \
b. Gotha
d. Leningrad
For a few years after Lampsacus began to strike for Alexander, production was on a small
scale. There is no gold coinage and surviving tetradrachms and drachms are rare. Die linkage
and stylistic homogeneity relate the varieties of large silver: the simple caduceus with or without
a secondary control, the elaborate caduceus with A/, and the club with or without K below the
stool. Obverses of the caduceus issue show a three-tier arrangement of the lion's mane with the
inner and central rows in higher relief than the other tier. The die of the club issue separates the
mane from the skin along a sharp vertical line. Locks are now disposed in two tiers but still on
two distinct planes. The Zeus of the early tetradrachms sits stiffly upright on a stool with rung,
his legs either close together or slightly spread and his feet on a footstool shown in perspective.
Drachms of very similar style are associated with the tetradrachms of Series I and II while
drachms alone comprise Series III and IV. The club and sword strikings of Series II and III
share an obverse die. There is no die linkage to establish the position of the Series IV star issue
Two varieties of bronzes can be connected with the Lampsacene silver of early date. The first
has AAEHANAPOY between a club and a bow in case with a small epsilon below the type. The
24
second issue reverses the position of the elements of the type and BAZI is inscribed between them
with a star and delta in the lower field. The star is probably to be linked with the control of
Series IV but the letters have no parallel on the silver. Attribution to Lampsacus rests on the
style of the obverses. Bronze 15 is close to drachm 4 in profile and in the marked difference in
relief of the sections of the lion's mane. Other dies are similar to the silver dies of the early
period and also to early dies of Series V. Especially striking is the comparision between bronzes
20-21 and drachms 59-62 of the issue. So close are profiles and treatment of the mane that all
six dies might be the work of a single hand. These connections between bronze and silver,
extending over a number of series, suggest a more or less steady output of bronze of Alexander
type during the early years of minting at Lampsacus. The quantity involved may have been
small, and there is no evidence that production continued after Alexander's death.
With Series V we come to the first major issue of the mint, a very substantial coinage of
staters, tetradrachms, and drachms under the control *.6 On the initial reverses of the larger
silver the monogram is missing; obverse 25 links reverses with and without Obverses 22 and
26 are in the direct tradition of the club tetradrachm: the vertical alignment of the inner locks of
the mane and the double outline of the lower part of the lion's jaw. With 23 a new obverse style
appears, to continue in 24-25 and 27-30. Heads are larger, the knotted paws below Heracles'
chin more prominent, and the inner locks of the mane follow the line of the lion's jaw. Obverses
31-33 have still larger heads and a bolder treatment of details. With 34-40 Heracles' features
are less gross and emphasis is placed on the rendering of the lion's skin which is drawn in tight
folds over Heracles' neck. The final tetradrachm dies, 41-42, show some resemblance in
portraiture to the preceding dies but manes are now depicted as heavy intertwining locks, the
area of skin in front of the mane is greatly reduced, and the knotted paws are very attenuated.
Reverses, too, show considerable variation. In the beginning the style differs little from that
of the club tetradrachm but with Series V, 30, and especially 31-33 a distinctive representation
appears: a slightly larger head with long pointed beard is joined to a heavy body, legs wide apart
under stiff folds of drapery. This peculiar style of a spread-lap Zeus is found at Abydus and
seems to have been copied for a few dies at Sardes; it is otherwise unparalleled in the
Alexandrine coinage. Subsequent versions show the god in better proportion and in more
graceful pose. Legs are spread, the right foot higher than the left on the slanting footstool, but
the exaggerated lap has disappeared and the folds of the drapery are softer and more natural.
The pattern of the tetradrachms is repeated in large measure throughout the drachm issues.
On Series V gold coinage the goddess of the silver is replaced by addorsed horse foreparts.
Early dies are of good style with Athena's hair twisted into corkscrew curls, reminiscent of the
initial output of other mints. Subsequent dies show loose locks and finally tumbled masses of
hair which combine with fluttering crest terminals to convey an impression of agitation. The
Nikes of 85-94 are slender and well proportioned by comparison with the heavy and rather
clumsy representations on later dies. Lettering, at first small and neat, becomes larger and often
poorly cut. At the end of the sequence, 108 is crude and possibly an imitation. Fractional gold is
8 An indication of the truly impressive size of some issues may be gleaned from a note in Newell's manus-
cript, which reads as follows: "Enquiries made at the U.S. Mint in Philadelphia show that, with modern
appliances and machinery, an average of 400,000 dimes (a silver coin of about the weight and surface area of
the Alexander drachm) can be secured from a single pair of dies before the appearance of fractures or other
damage. Ancient dies may have been less hard (a point which is not susceptible to proof) but, on the other
hand, blanks were softer as the silver used was purer than at the present day. As in ancient times the dies
were not subjected to an even pressure but were pounded with a hammer, they may for this reason have given
out sooner than a modern die (especially that used for the reverse) would. Even taking this into consideration,
we ought to be willing to admit that an average of some 200,000 drachms to a single obverse die would not
Reducing the total even further, to 100,000 drachms, still amounts to a very substantial quantity of coinage.
Lampsacus
25
Series VI with fi! is another large emission, comparable in size to the preceding issue to judge
by the number of surviving specimens. Series VI output is limited to Philip II staters and
Alexander drachms. On the gold the head of Hera is used as a secondary control. This is the
standard Chalcis type: head facing and forehead bound with a broad diadem above which there
is a row of discs. Later a serpent replaces the head. Reverse 120, with both head and a tiny
serpent at bottom right, would seem to be a transitional issue, combining the two secondary
controls. Within the Philip II sequence the Apollo heads are notably similar; it is the reverses
that display stylistic variation. The early horses have thin stiff rear legs, close together, and
forelegs arranged in a fan pattern. Rear legs become heavier and separated while the forelegs are
In the beginning the drachm issues are controlled by fi! alone. Later a serpent is added as a
secondary control; the Hera head does not appear. Stylistically the small silver resembles that
of the * emissions.
After two large strikings the mint curtails production. Gold is still limited to Philip II staters
and there are a few drachms. In Series VII the serpent is the only control. Series VIII with 3t
adds a grain ear as a supplementary control in the exergue of the gold as well as a third control
to lower right: a serpent on 165-67 and A on 168-69. The A also appears on the single recorded
That the sequence thus far is correct is attested by the pattern of die linkage and the repetition
of secondary controls.
Series IX with f or \ is another very large striking with more dies recorded for staters and
drachms than elsewhere in the coinage to date. There is also greater diversity in secondary
controls.
A few Philip II staters are produced and then replaced by the standard Alexandrine type in
the name of either Philip III or the young Alexander. Apparently Arrhidaeus now felt suffi-
ciently secure in the joint regency to sign his own money. Throughout the gold coinage there is
no straightforward stylistic development of the obverse heads. Athenas with tight corkscrew
curls and Athenas with loose straggly locks exist side by side within the same secondary control,
attesting more than one engraver at work. Reverses are more consistent. On almost all dies Nike
The control for this issue, -f and its mirror image X, is a curious device. It reminded Newell of
the buckle for a sword belt but it may be nothing more than a decorative motif.
Series X. Control: Kl
3c, A, grain
Ai, serpent
Staters
283.
Vienna
284.
285.
286.
*ANS = Hirsch 33, Nov. 17, 1913, 648, 8.471; Athens; commerce 1949
*London
26
Tetradrachms
b. ANS, 16.84->
292. *London
Drachms
297. *London
a. *ANS, 4.28|
b. Yale (Bab)
c. ANS, 4.04<-
Lampsacus
b. ANS, 4.281
b. Turin, 4.04-
c. Helbing, Dec. 9, 1932, 587 = Helbing, Jan. 31, 1930, 203, 3.90
b. ANS, 4.07-
b. Leningrad
c. Commerce 1970
b. ANS, 4.32<-
b. Turin, 4.17
b. ANS, 4.05->
28
339. Paris
b. Storrs Coll.
348. Oxford
b. London
359. *Athens
Drachms
b. Athens
Drachms
Lampsacus
b. ANS, 4.24<-
c. Turin, 4.13|
Staters
377. ""Leningrad
Drachms
b.*ANS, 4.15|
b. ANS, 4.22<-
b. ANS, 4.16|
b. ANS, 4.2U
30
b. ANS, 4.211
c. London
b. ANS, 4.03|
c. Athens
398. Yale
Staters
400. *The Hague1; Miinz. u. Med. FPL 227, Nov. 1962, 436, 8.53
Drachms
407. Rev. of 405. *ANS (Armenak), 4.21 <-; Athens; The Hague
Lampsacus
Drachm
Drachms
b. *ANS, 4.19|
c. Athens
Drachms
429. Obv. of 428 recut. *Haughton Coll. ex Storrs, 4.05|; ANS, 4.02|
Staters
32
432. ""Leningrad
434. *ANS = Weber 2076, 8.53 S; SNGCop 631, 8.521; Schlessinger 13, Feb. 4, 1935, 659, 8.50
b. Berlin
440. Rev. of 439. ""Dewing Coll., 8.55; Rome, Museo Nazionale delle Terme
Drachms
b. Commerce (Asia Minor 1961), 4.231; Athens (Corinth 1938), ANSMN 10, 169, 4.10
Lampsacus
466. ""Leningrad
468. *Gotha
469a. *ANS, 4.19|; Athens (Corinth 1938), ANSMN 10, 168, 4.07
b. Yale (Bab)
484. *Leningrad
487. *Leningrad
b. Athens
b. Turin, 4.23<-
34
b. Rev. of 492b. Munz. u. Med. FPL 336, July 1972, 11), 4.28
494. Leningrad
b. ANS, 4.11 \
b. ANS, 4.03->
b. Turin, 4.10|
506. Rev. of 505b. *Commerce (Asia Minor 1961); commerce (Asia Minor 1961); Yale (Bab)
c. ANS, 4.10<-
d. Leningrad
b. ANS, 4.26|
c. Yale (Bab)
b. ANS, 3.981
b. ANS, 4.081
Lampsacus
LYSIMACHUS
Drachms
B. *Vienna, 4.18
C. *Munich
I. ""Munich
J. *ANS, 4.00S
36
M. *ANS, 4.21
N. *ANS, 4.24/
O. *Yale (Bab)
P. *Yale (Bab)
Staters
S. *ANS, 8.48<-
T. *London
With Series X bearing control Kl, tetradrachms reappear after a long absence to supplement a
modest output of staters and an abundant emission of drachms. There are new secondary
controls: O, N, M or I^E, M>, and The last two quickly disappear but O, N, and I^E or
variations of it recur in succeeding issues. On a few drachms of the Kl issue and A Q which
In the absence of die linkage there can be no absolute certainty that the sequence of Series X-
XIII is correct. Kl and A Q are the only issues with the spread-lap Zeus and they alone use Is? as
a secondary control. Then, too, it might be assumed that the two small emissions (Series XI and
XII) rather than the somewhat larger amphora striking would follow the very substantial Kl
coinage.
For the next issues there is die linkage, establishing the following pattern. There seem to have
been two emissions with Mouse in control. The first consisted of a few staters and a modest
output of drachms, all with secondary controls. After it ended, Herm was in charge of the new
issue but for some reason his tenure was short-lived and Mouse was called back into service.9
The obverse die of Herm and one from Mouse's earlier emission were still usable and these,
together with a few new dies, produced a small coinage of drachms alone. One of the new dies
carried over to Bird on Branch, an issue which terminated abruptly. Production was definitely
winding down; there was no need for secondary controls after the first Mouse striking.
The last pre-Lysimachus coinage at Lampsacus, Series XVIII, illustrates the crucial
connection between die linkage and chronology. In his rough outline of the Lampsacene
sequence, Newell placed the issue with forepart of Pegasus directly after that with .J', Series IX,
and dated it ca. 318-316. In the 1955 study of the Bab Hoard, Thompson and Bellinger gave it
the same relative position but dated it ca. 310, assuming an interval without coinage between
the death of Philip III and the agreement among the successors which gave Antigonus firm
We were all wrong! The Pegasus issue immediately precedes Lysimachus's own coinage at
9 That Mouse without monogram follows Herm is established by the shared obverse die. No. 419 is the later
stage with a die break from the forehead and deterioration around the eye and over the forehead.
Lampsacus
37
It is easy to see how we went astray. The A and particularly the distinctive device of Artemis
as secondary controls would seem to link the Pegasus issue with Series IX but there are counter-
balancing connections. Series IX and XIV both use a as a subordinate control; the r? of the
Pegasus striking first appears on the coinage of Kl and A Q and also serves as a secondary control
Pegasus issue.
In Newell's case there was an additional factor. His manuscript mentions three Pegasus coins
as coming from the Sinan Pascha Hoard, which was surely buried ca. 317 B.C. This hoard did
include intrusions which is not surprising in a large deposit coming in various lots at different
times from a number of dealers.11 One assumes that Newell himself later realized that the
Pegasus coins did not belong to this hoard for there is no coin of that issue in the ANS trays with
Now that the Pegasus issue has been re-dated, one can see that it fits much better at the end of
the century than it did when it was assigned to 318-316 or even 310. There is the evidence of
four late hoards. In the case of the Asia Minor 1961 Hoard both the dealer who recorded the
deposit and Charles Hersh who obtained specimens from it describe the Pegasus coins as the best
preserved in the Lampsacus sequence. There are also many more pieces from this emission than
from any other: 24 Pegasi, for example, as contrasted with 5 from the equally large issue.
The hoards of Armenak, Cavalla, and Larissa tell much the same story. Armenak has 52
Pegasi and 31 with f. Cavalla and Larissa are more evenly balanced, but in all three hoards the
Although somewhat outside the scope of this study, the early coinage of Lysimachus at
Lampsacus is of interest with respect to mint organization. Even a partial record of the issues
The first introduces a new control: a half dolphin is combined with the usual lion forepart.
Subordinate controls are and 5E. When the coinage is inscribed with the name of Lysimachus,
this workshop continues to use the marine symbol but the strange truncated version is replaced
by a whole dolphin, accompanied by the lion forepart. A long torch takes the place of
monograms below the stool. Within the life of obverse J the dolphin is replaced first by l"E and
then by W cut over l"E. At the end of the sequence a drachm and a remarkable stater have the W
and torch combination and it is noteworthy that this marking is carried over to the initial gold
Meanwhile the second workshop follows a more conservative pattern. The forepart of Pegasus,
F-H, invariably joins the forepart of the lion in the left field. When the coinage bears the name
of Alexander, monograms are inscribed below the stool and these are die linked, with N replacing
PP on the later stage of obverse F. Throughout the sequence with the name of Lysimachus,
A striking feature of the Lampsacene Lysimachi is the arrangement of the legend. On the
drachms BAIIAEQ2 AYIIMAXOY runs around inward from the upper right to lower left; on the
staters it runs down, the title outward the name inward, to left and right of Nike.
As noted above, the W and torch controls carry over from the Alexander issues of Lysimachus
to his own coinage. Links with earlier Antigonid strikings are also present. The monogram N is
found in Series X, XI, and XVIII while lP is probably related to the IT of Series XVIII.
Although r^E is not used for Series XVIII, it is present in Series X-XIV. A unique drachm of
Series XVIII, 534, combines forepart of Pegasus and torch, the dominant control of the second
workshop. Both devices are closely connected with Lampsacus and it may be assumed that they
are now civic symbols, indicative of the minting authority, rather than magistrates' markings.
"One need only compare 249a, 260, 280c, and 281b on Plate 10 with 499a, 510a, 516, 528a, 530, and 532 on
Plate 17.
38
Lampsacus was to become Lysimachus's major mint in Asia Minor. Its elaborate pattern of
mint activity, as outlined above, indicates that this pre-eminence began immediately after
Ipsus.
No.
Obv.
Rev.
No.
Obv.
Rev.
No.
Obv.
Rev.
Coins
Dies
Dies
Coins
Dies
Dies
Coins
Dies
Dies
I:
Caduceus
II:
Club
10
III:
Sword
IV:
Star*
V:
62b
24
39
104
21
61
60
40
51
VI:
78
18
38
50
26
45
VII:
Lampsacus
39
joint regency, the coinage of the father serving to bolster the position of the son.13 Allowing two
years for series IX and another two for Series VI takes the coinage back to 323 when Alexander
died. Series V must surely be the output of at least two years (325/4 and 324/3) and this is the
time when a considerable amount of money would have been needed to reimburse the merce-
naries being sent home from Asia.14 It should be noted, too, that drachms of Series V and VI in
very fresh condition were included in the crucial Asia Minor 1964 Hoard, securely dated to ca.
321 B.C.
There can be less certainty with regard to the chronology of Series I-IV. Baldwin15 terminates
the autonomous gold of Lampsacus ca. 330 B.C. If it was only then that Alexander designated
Lampsacus as a royal mint, the Alexandrine coinage is unlikely to have started before 329 B.C.
After the death of Philip III there is at other mints an interval without coinage. The situation
at Sardes, Miletus, and Abydus is, as one would expect, paralleled at Lampsacus. No strong
central authority existed to formulate fiscal policy until Antigonus succeeded in establishing his
control of Asia Minor ca. 311 B.C. The following two years produced the large emission of Kl
coins, with tetradrachms as well as gold and small silver. This is followed by somewhat smaller
issues and then by the die linked sequence of Series XIV-XVII which would cover two years at
most. Finally, there is the extensive Pegasus issue which links with Lysimachus's coinage.
It would be interesting to know who was responsible for the Pegasus striking. In the summer
of 302 Lysimachus crossed the Hellespont, landing near Lampsacus. That city threw open its
gates (Diod. 20.107) but the powerful fortress of Abydus, well garrisoned by Antigonid troops,
resisted. The arrival of Demetrius turned the tide. Abydus was strengthened and Lampsacus
retaken before the advent of winter (Diod. 20.111). Lysimachus, therefore, could have held
Lampsacus for no longer than five or six months. He may at that time have started the Pegasus
coinage which continued to be struck after his forced retreat. On the other hand, it seems more
likely that Lysimachus during his brief occupation of Lampsacus did not interfere with a coinage
begun by Antigonus. Both men would have realized the importance of abundant financial
reserves as they prepared for the impending struggle which ended at Ipsus.
Series:
CONTROL
DATES
Caduceus
329/8
II
Club
328/7
III
Sword
327/6
IV
Star
326/5
325/4-324/3
VI
323/2-322/1
VII
Serpent
321/0
VIII
320/19
IX
319/8-318/7
Kl
310/9-309/8
XI
AQ
308/7
XII
307/6
XIII
Amphora
306/5
XIV
ABYDUS
ATTRIBUTION
The identification of Abydus as the source of the coinage which follows is less clearly defined
than was the case with Lampsacus. Throughout there is no symbol which points unmistakably
to Abydus, as the Pegasus forepart on a late issue identifies the Mysian mint. There are,
however, links between the two coinages which strongly suggest geographical proximity. First
and most significant, perhaps, are the stylistic similarities, especially noteworthy in the
rendering of the ungainly spread-lap Zeus of tetradrachms from contemporary strikings. This
seems to go beyond mere copying and may well mean that the same die cutter was employed, for
a time at least, by the two mints.16 There are also the two dies used at Lampsacus and another
city, and although one cannot rule out the possibility of transfers to a distant mint, it is surely
more probable that neighboring workshops are involved. It may be pertinent, too, to note that
in hoards buried to the north of Asia Minor and therefore likely to have a major representation
of coinages from northern Asia Minor,17 the dominant mints are Lampsacus and the city that
It is interesting to note that the close connection between the two mints continued at a later
period under Antiochus Hierax. In his study of Seleucid coinage,18 Newell publishes an obverse
die used at Lampsacus and also at Abydus and mentions other obverse dies from the two cities
so related in style as to have been in all probability cut by the same artist.
Newell has left no detailed explanation of his reasons for assigning the issues that follow to
Abydus but among his unpublished papers is a notation to the effect that Abydus was an active
autonomous mint and likely to have continued under Alexander who usually converted
autonomous mints into royal ones when situated in cities of strategic importance. That Abydus
was an important fortress is attested by Lysimachus's attempt to capture it after his acquisition
of Lampsacus in 302 B.C. His siege failed due to the appearance of Demetrius's fleet with
supplies and reinforcements for the strong garrison of Antigonid troops. It seems likely that one
factor in the struggle to control Abydus was its importance as a productive mint.
It may at this point be appropriate to discuss briefly the symbols found on the coinages since
their interpretation has at times been responsible for mistaken mint attribution. In the middle
of the last century Ludwig Miiller published his monumental compilation of all Alexander issues
known to him.19 Many of these he assigned to specific mints on the basis of distinctive symbols.
In the case of posthumous Alexanders from the third century and later his attributions were
substantially correct, but in the case of earlier Alexanders his attributions were often radically
revised by Edward T. Newell's research. Newell showed that issues purportedly from different
mints were in reality, on the evidence of die linkage, from the same mints.20
16 This distinctive style in its exaggerated form does not appear elsewhere. There is a somewhat similar
Zeus on an occasional die from late issues at Sardes but the resemblance is not close enough to suggest
17 Paeonia (1GCH 400), Lergutsa (IGCH 800), and N. Greece (IGCH 801).
18 Edward T. Newell, The Coinage of the Western Seleucid Mints, ANSNS 4 (1977), pp. 326-31, Pis. 70,
40 E. T. Newell, Reattribution of Certain Tetradrachms of Alexander the Great (New York, 1912), p. 2,
"Therefore, if two coins, with varying symbols on their reverses, have their obverses from the same die, they
must necessarily be from the same mint; and not as Miiller would have it, the one struck perhaps in Pella of
11
42
On the lifetime and early posthumous Alexanders there is rarely any indication of the issuing
authority. This is Alexander's money, as the legend states: the coinage is not that of the
individual cities. There are exceptions: issues of Sidon, Aradus, and Ake clearly indicate their
origin but it is noteworthy that the indication is consistent and not sporadic. Moving north to
Asia Minor and Macedonia, one finds occasional evidence of mint or regional identification. The
gold of Miletus, and originally the gold alone, has a small bipennis consistently added to the
major control. On later issues, from the end of the fourth century on, the bipennis is always
present. At Amphipolis there is no indication of the issuing mint or early issues, but from the
Lampsacus the forepart of Pegasus appears as a mint mark but only at the very end of the
The important point, with regard to the mints of Asia Minor and Macedon, is that when a
distinctive mint mark appears it is usually chronologically late and always consistently used. It
makes no sense to suppose that a mint would apply a civic symbol on an isolated striking and
then abandon it. The Pegasus protome on the second issue at Abydus, which is linked to a long
sequence bearing quite different symbols, does not place the emission at Lampsacus. At most it
means that whoever was responsible for selecting the control symbols had some connection with
Staters
a. *McClean 3405, 8.561; Berlin; ANS, 8.52J.; Saroglos Coll.; Sotheby, Apr. 16, 1969, 266
(Paeonia), 8.541
2. Rev. below wing, HH. ""Commerce (Asia Minor 1964); Munz. u. Med. 32, Oct. 20, 1966, 82
Tetradrachms
5a. Rev. of 4. ""Pozzi Coll.; ANS, 17.191; London; Hersh Coll., 17.22|
6. Rev. of 5b. *London = Naville 1, Apr. 4, 1921 (Pozzi), 909; ANS (Demanhur), Reattrib.,
7. ""ANS, 17.221
!1 So, too, the single issue with addorsed horse foreparts, here assigned to Lampsacus, cannot signify
Perinthus. An isolated early striking with youth and fillet, originally assigned to Sicyon because of an
apparent connection with bronze issues of that mint, has been tentatively reassigned to Corinth by Hyla
Troxell ("The Peloponnesian Alexanders," ANSMN 1971, pp. 51-52) who suggests that the symbol may
* The die moved from Lampsacus to Abydus. A die break at upper left on the Abydus stater establishes
Abydus-
Drachms
b. ANS, 4.12|
b. SNGFitz 2221, 4.27|; Leningrad; ANS, 4.23|; commerce (Asia Minor 1964)
19. London
24. *ANS, 3.99|; commerce (Asia Minor 1961); Peus 283, May 14, 1974, 66
26. *London
Staters
Il
Drachms
31a. *ANS (Sinan), 4.29|; Hersh Coll. (Asia Minor 1964); ANS, 4.19|
37a. Rev. of 36b. *Commerce (Asia Minor 1964); commerce (Asia Minor 1964)
43. *Commerce (Asia Minor 1964); commerce (Asia Minor 1964); commerce (Asia Minor 1964)
46. *London
51. Obv. of 49
a. ANS, 4.28
b. *Commerce (Asia Minor 1964); commerce (Asia Minor 1964); ANS (Sinan), 4.29|; ANS,
4.22
52. Obv. of 50
c. The Hague
c. ANS, 4.241
58. *Commerce (Asia Minor 1964); ANS (Sinan), 4.29|; commerce (Asia Minor 1964)
Abydus
15
Philip II Staters
b. Rev. below horses, M. London, 8.53; Dresden, 8.60; Sotheby, Parke-Bernet, Dec. 9, 1969,
b. ""London, 8.58->
Tetradrachms
63. *ANS, 17.23-; Vienna; ANS (Demanhur), Reattrib., pi. 17, 11, 16.58->; Natl. Mus.,
Drachms
64. Obv. of 60
b. ANS, 4.16|
c. Leningrad
65. ""Berlin
67. Obv. of 60. *Hersh Coll. (Asia Minor 1964); Saroglos Coll.
68. Obv. of 60. *Hersh Coll. (Asia Minor 1964); ANS, 4.13->
Philip II Staters
72. ""London
46
Drachms
76. Obv. of 60. Rev. tunny cut over palm tree. *ANS (Armenak), 4.16-; ANS (Cavalla),
4.13-
c. ANS, 4.25-
80. Obv. of 77. *ANS (Sinan), 4.34->; ANS, 4.24-; ANS, 3.97-; Petsalis Coll.
Imitation
Series V. Control: I
Philip II Staters
b. Athens
86. Rev. large T in front of charioteer. *London; ANS = Merzbacher, Nov. 15, 1910, 377,
8.57|
88. ""London
89a. ""Berlin; Fay Coll.; ANS, 8.46-; commerce 1934, 8.59s,; Vinchon, Nov. 20, 1961, 133
b. Munich; London; NCirc, Nov. 1973, 8790 = Naville 5, June 18, 1923, 1355 (Maeander
Valley), 8.59
Drachms
a A stater of the Pozzi Collection (Naville 1, Apr. 4, 1921, 840) with monogram and horse's leg below and a
Abydus
17
b. ANS, 4.221
93a. *London
Philip II Staters
96. *Commerce before 1941; Berlin; Hess-Leu, Dec. 6, 1966, 247 (Eskisehir), 8.59
98. *ANS = A. Cahn 60, July 2, 1928, 389, 8.58<-; Berlin; Munich; London; J. Schulman,
99. Obv. of 98
Philip II Staters
a. *Saroglos Coll.; Munz. u. Med. FPL 262, Mar. 1966, 6, 8.56; Hunter, p. 288, 6, 8.60
103a. Leningrad
104a. *London; Naville 5, June 18, 1923, 1361 (Larnaca), 8.54; Sotheby, Oct. 10, 1974, 19, 8.48
b. Rev. of 103b. Helbing, Mar. 20, 1928, 161 = Merzbacher, Nov. 2, 1909, 2937 = Egger,
105a. *Miinz. u. Med. 32, Oct. 20, 1966, 79 (Asia Minor 1964)
b. Rev. exergue off flan. Naville 13, June 27, 1928, 469, 8.52
c. Rev. of 103b. *Gotha; Munz. u. Med. FPL 389, May 1977, 5 = Auctiones Basel 6, Sept.
106. Rev. in exergue, horse's leg. *Hirsch 34, May 5, 1914, 284 = Hirsch 19, Nov. 11, 1907,
107. Rev. as 106. *ANS = Naville 15, July 2, 1930; 465, 8.521; Hirsch 1033, 8.601
14 The die probably moved from Lampsacus to Abydus but there seems no obvious reason for the transfer.
Both mints continued to produce Philip II staters although in the case of Lampsacus the output is greatly
reduced.
18
Quarter Staters
Eighth Staters
Drachms
b. Saroglos Coll.
113. Rev. <DIAinnOY cut over AAEEANAPOY. *ANS (Larissa), 4.05|; London
Philip II Staters
Drachms
120. Rev. to l., chelys; to r., horse's leg. *ANS (Sinan), 4.25|; SNGFilz 2279, 4.21 |; Miinz.
122a. Rev. to l., owl. *ANS = Ratto, Apr. 4, 1927, 712, 4.191
Abydus
49
Philip II Staters
a. Rev. to lower r., fulmen. *London; Sotheby, Parke-Bernet, Dec. 9, 1969, 14 (Paeonia),
b. Rev. to lower r., horse's leg. ANS, 8.04 \; Munich; Kishinev (Lergutsa); Schlessinger 13,
127a. *Paris; London (Maeander Valley), 8.45; Vinchon, Apr. 25, 1966, 205; Bourgey, Nov. 14,
1972, 270 _
Staters
b. *London
129a. Rev. of 128b. *London = Naville 13, June 27, 1928, 509; Leningrad, 8.64|
Drachms
131. Obv. of 125. Rev. OlAinnOY; below stool, A. *ANS (Sinan), 4.28|; London
132. Rev. OlAinnOY; below stool, A; to r., horse's leg. *Hersh Coll.; Saroglos Coll. = Miinz. u.
Hemidrachms
135. Rev. to l., grain ear; below stool, leaf. * Istanbul (Izmit), 2.17|; Seyrig Coll., 2.01 |
Series X. Control: M or W or
Philip II Staters
136. Rev. below horses, r^H and horse's leg. *London; Berlin; Burgas (Jasna Poljana)
137a. Rev. to l., M" and serpent. Helbing, Mar. 20, 1928, 194 = Riechmann 30, Dec. 11, 1924,
50
b. Rev. to l., M and serpent. *London; Miinz. u. Med. FPL 336, July 1972, 15, 8.45
139a. Rev. of 138b. *ANS, 8.52/; Coin Galleries, July 13, 1954, 3355
b. Rev. to l., M and serpent. Munz. u. Med. 32, Oct. 20, 1966, 85 (Asia Minor 1964)
c. Rev. to l., M and cornucopia. Barclay V. Head, A Guide to the Principal...Coins of the
Ancients (London, 1895), p. 62, 8, 8.51; Seltman Coll. = Canessa, May 22, 1922, 400,
(Brandis), 8.55; Rosenberg, Mar. 9, 1914, 168; Coin Galleries, Nov. 19, 1973, 3
e. Rev. as 139b. Leningrad (Anadol), Pridik 6; Glendining, Mar. 9, 1931, 1004, 8.55
b. Rev. of 139e. Berry Coll.; Cahn 80, Feb. 27, 1933, 177 = Helbing, Mar. 20, 1928, 193,
c. Rev. as 139c. Milan; Saroglos Coll. = Hess, Apr. 5, 1955, 27, 8.55; Booth Coll., 8.58; Basel
Munzhandlung 4, Oct. 1, 1935, 638, 8.56; Hess-Leu, Mar. 27, 1956, 275; Hess-Leu, Apr.
d. Rev. as 139b. Seyrig Coll., 8.55/; Florence; Glendining, Oct. 4, 1957, 52; Miinz. u. Med.
FPL 227, Nov. 1962, 446; Coin Galleries FPL 13, June 1958, 1265, 8.60
c. Rev. as 141c. SNGBerry 153 (Eskisehir), 8.57|; Yale Univ., 8.60|; Anastos Coll., 8.55*-;
Miinz. u. Med. FPL 195, Nov./Dec. 1959, 351 = Munz. u. Med. FPL 185, Nov./Dec. 1958,
341, 8.55; Hess-Leu, May 5, 1965, 156; Berry Coll.; Hess-Leu, Apr. 16, 1957, 189, 8.61
d. Rev. to l., cornucopia alone. SNGBerry 152 (Eskisehir), 8.56->; Coin Galleries, Apr. 20,
1961, 7 = Coin Galleries FPL 1, 1960, 109; G. Hirsch, Apr. 2, 1959, 788, 8.10
144a. Rev. of 142d. ""Commerce (Elder, July 1920); G. Hirsch, Apr. 4, 1960, 139a
146. Rev. to l., M> and serpent. *SNGCop 1071, 8.51; Piatt, Mar. 27, 1922 (Luneau), 374
148a. Rev. as 147. ""Paris; Munz. u. Med. FPL 281, Oct. 1967, 10, 8.60
b. Rev. as 148a. Munz. u. Med. 52, June 19, 1975, 129, 8.58
Drachms
149. Rev. to l., MH; below stool, PI. *ANS, 4.02/; ANS, 4.23/
150. Rev. to l., wreath over MH; below stool, IT. Leningrad
151. Obv. of 150. Rev. to l., MH over wreath; below stool, PI. ANS (Asia Minor 1961), 4.27->;
152. Rev. <PIAinnOY; to l., wreath over MH; below stool, horse's leg. ""ANS, 4.23|; ANS, 4.20|
153. Rev. <DIAinnOY; to l., MH; below stool, horse's leg. *ANS, 3.56|
154. Rev. OlAinnOY; to l., M>; below stool, serpent. ""ANS, 4.28|
Hemidrachm
156. Rev. OlAinnOY; to l., MH; below stool, horse's leg. *ANS = Naville 15, July 2, 1930, 517,
1.95-
Abydus
51
Staters
157. Obv. of 145. Rev. OlAinTFOY; to l., pentagram alone; below wing, serpent. ""Auctiones
Basel 5, Dec. 2, 1975, 74 = Sotheby, Apr. 16, 1969, 353 (Paeonia), 353, 8.50
a. Rev. <DIAinnOY; to l., M and pentagram; below wing, serpent. ANS, 8.70|; Vinchon, Oct.
160a. Rev. as 159b. *ANS = Bourgey, Dec. 15, 1909, 121, 8.52,/; Bucharest cast (MarSsesti),
Poenaru-Bordea, 8.52],
b. Rev. as 159a. Hess, Apr. 5, 1955, 26 = Naville 14, July 2, 1929, 202 = Naville 13, June
161a. Rev. of 160b. ""Commerce 1930; Egger 41, Nov. 18, 1912, 427, 8.52
163. Rev. of 162. *Munz. u. Med. FPL 247, Sept. 1964, 25 (Asia Minor 1964)
165a. Rev. AAEEANAPOY; to l., M and pentagram; below wing, cornucopia. ""Dewing Coll., 8.57
b. Rev. as 165a. Glendining, Feb. 12, 1958, 1341 = Egger 39, Jan. 15, 1912, 258, 8.55
c. Rev. as 165a. Gulbenkian Coll.; Santamaria, Jan. 24, 1938, 141, 8.45
167. Rev. to l., M and pentagram; below wing, serpent. *Auctiones Basel 5, Dec. 2, 1975, 72
b. Rev. as 165a. Burgas (Jasna Poljana); Hess, Feb. 15, 1934, 234 = Ball 6, Feb. 9. 1932,
171a. Obv. griffin on helmet. Rev. as 159b. *ANS = Egger 41, Nov. 18, 1912, 426, 8.61|
b. Rev. as 159b. Bank Leu, Apr. 25, 1972, 169 = Hess-Leu Apr. 7, 1960, 150
172a. Rev. of 171a. Naville 15, July 2, 1930, 511 = Naville 4, (June 16,] 1922, 467
b. Rev. of 171b. ""Ratio FPL, Dec. 1922, 1989 = Naville 1, Apr. 4, 1921 (Pozzi), 945, 8.57
173a. Obv. griffin on helmet. Rev. of 171b. Schlessinger 13, Feb. 4, 1935, 740
Drachm
175. Rev. <DIAinnOY; to l., M and pentagram; below stool, serpent. *Paris,25 4.04|
This first section of the coinage begins in the lifetime of Alexander with the transfer of an
obverse die from Lampsacus ca. 325 B.C. and ends with the death of Philip III in 317 B.C. The
material here assembled provides no link between the first issue and those that follow but
** G. Le Rider and H. Seyrig, "Objets de la collection Louis de Clercq donnes en 1967...," RN 1969, p. 29,
434, pi. 8.
n The outer brackets show drachm links, the inner ones stater transfers.
52
I.
II.
III.
IV.
V.
Hermes, I
Pegasus forepart, A
Palm tree, M
AY
M, star
Horse's leg
Grain ear
M, pentagram
VI.
VII.
VIII.
IX.
X.
XI.
Fractional gold is probably to be associated with Series VII and VIII. Staters of the earlier
issue use both pedum and horse's leg as secondary controls and this is the only appearance of the
pedum. On the rare staters of Series VIII the horse's leg is the primary control.
A few staters with the name of Alexander are struck in Series I and II and the type reappears
only toward the end of the sequence in Series IX and XI. Series X and XI contain staters with
the name of Philip III. Stylistic development is in accord with that of the Alexander coinage as
a whole. The tight corkscrew curls of Athena's hair are replaced in Series XI by locks falling
loosely over the neck. On three dies of the same issue (171, 173, 174) a griffin replaces the
traditional serpent decoration on the helmet.27 Within that issue, too, the standing Nike with
vertical stylis gives place to a goddess walking left and occasionally holding the stylis diagonally
across her body. The large pentagram alone in the left field of 157 is either an experiment,
quickly abandoned, or a clumsy attempt to re-use a reverse die of Series X by obliterating the
The only staters of Series III-VIII are those with the types of Philip II. Again there is an
obverse used at both Lampsacus (154) and Abydus (101) but there is no die break to establish
the sequence of transfer and no obvious reason for it. What is particulary noteworthy is the
abundance of Philip II coinage at both mints in sharp contrast to the absence or scarcity of such
strikings at Miletus and Sardes. If, as suggested elsewhere,28 the posthumous Philips were
intended to strengthen Arrhidaeus's claims to legitimacy, it is not surprising that they appear so
often at the two Asia Minor mints closest to Macedon where Philip's party was strong.
Early reverses show a treatment of the horses similar to that on the first dies of Lampsacus:
rear legs thin and close together and forelegs in a fan-shaped arrangement. On all later reverses
the rear legs are separated and the forelegs paw the air in agitated motion. In the beginning the
head of Apollo is delicately delineated with a smooth rendering of the hair and a wreath of small
laurel leaves. On subsequent obverses the leaves are larger and the hair curls around the crown
A hallmark of the tetradrachms and drachms of Series I-VII is the awkward spread-lap Zeus of
the reverses. By Series VIII this distinctive style disappears; the god is shown in a relaxed pose
Staters
176. Obv. of 173. Rev. to l., male head; below wing, leaf. *Berlin, 8.46|
Abydus
Tetradrachms
179. *Paris
180. ""Vienna
Drachms
b. Leningrad
b. ANS, 4.07|
c. ANS, 4.18|
b. ANS, 4.26|
191. *Naville 1, Apr. 4, 1921 (Pozzi), 938, 4.14; Peus, Oct. 30, 1973, 90
b. ANS, 3.991
197. *SNGFilz 2224, 4.02/; Leningrad = Schlessinger 13, Feb. 4, 1935, 716, 4.20
b. ANS, 3.93|
Staters
54
Drachms
c. *The Hague
214. *Paris
Staler
216. *Paris
Drachms
219a. *ANS (Larissa), 4.08<-; Athens (Corinth 1938), ANSMN 10, 172
b. ANS, 4.18/
b. ANS, 4.03|
b. ANS, 4.23/
Abydus
247. Obv. of 246. *ANS (Armenak), 4.19|; ANS (Larissa), 4.20|; ANS, 4.04/
d. ANS, 3.93/
249a. ANS, 4.36/; ANS (Cavalla), 4.20/; ANS (Mesopotamia, ante 1920), 4.00/
b. ANS, 4.23/
c. ANS, 4.20|
d. ANS, 3.99|
b. ANS, 3.96|
263. *Paris
56
268. Obv. of 267. 'Sternberg, Nov. 24, 1977, 81, 4.33; London; ANS, 3.48|
Tetradrachms
Drachms
b. Leningrad
b. Hersh Coll.
277. *Athens
"The monogram is clear on 270a. On other strikings it is usually abbreviated. These minor variations are
not recorded.
Abydus
57
288. ""Athens
b. ANS, 3.80|
Staters
Drachms
c. Rev. to l., BP. ""Commerce (Asia Minor 1961); ANS, 4.16 \; ANS (Armenak), 4.08 \;
ANS, 4.02 \
300a. ""Commerce (Asia Minor 1961); commerce (Asia Minor 1961); ANS (Larissa), 4.13|
b. Athens
301a. ^Commerce (Asia Minor 1961); Piatt FPL 1971, 305, 4.43
c. ANS, 4.03|
302. ""Commerce (Asia Minor 1961); commerce (Asia Minor 1961); McClean 3499, 4.30
304. ""Commerce (Asia Minor 1961); commerce (Asia Minor 1961), 4.371
"
305. *Leningrad
58
b. ANS, 4.32|
316. *Hersh Coll. (Asia Minor 1961); ANS (Cavalla), 4.19 N; Berry Coll., 4.26
b. ANS, 4.24 \
b. Athens; Leningrad
327. Athens
Stalers
329a. Rev. serpent. ANS, 8.54*-; Bank Leu, Apr. 25, 1972, 167 = Munz. u. Med. FPL 195,
b. Rev. cornucopia. Naville 5, June 18, 1923, 1391; Hirsch, May 28, 1962, 85; Munz. u. Med.
Abydus
59
b. Rev. shell. ANS, 8.23- ["Serrure Sale 1912 no. 70," Newell]; Vinchon, May 2, 1973, 510
337. Rev. of 336c. *Commerce (Basel 1971), 8.51; commerce (N. Greece), 8.51
339. Rev. cornucopia. *Cahn 71, Oct. 1931, 268 = Cahn 68, Nov. 26, 1930, 1225= Ratto, Apr.
b. Rev. cornucopia. Commerce (MarSsesti), Poenaru Bordea 13, 8.48|; Commerce (N.
Greece), 8.58; Baranowsky FPL 1934, 6389; Hans M. F. Schulman, Jan. 17, 1963, 22
Staters
342a. Rev. of 341a. *ANS = Sotheby, June 2, 1924, 288, 8.55|; Leningrad
b. Rev. cornucopia; i*i recut. Naville 5, June 18, 1923, 1390, 8.54
Drachms
354a. Rev. griffin's head. ANS (Armenak), 4.17 N; ANS (Cavalla), 4.17|; Hersh Coll. (Asia
31 Die breaks below the eye and elsewhere, not present on 340, establish the sequence.
60
f. Rev. satrap's head. *Hersh Coll. (Asia Minor 1961); commerce (Asia Minor 1961, two
examples)
355a. Rev. griffin's head. *ANS, 4.28|; Kress 162, March 17, 1975, 449
f. Rev. satrap's head. Commerce (Asia Minor 1961); ANS (Larissa), 4.23|; ANS, 4.13|
c. Rev. satrap's head. ANS (Larissa), 4.24 \; ANS, 4.00|; commerce (Asia Minor 1961,
fourteen examples)
d. Rev. satrap's head. ANS (Cavalla), 4.28 \; commerce (Asia Minor 1961, five examples)
f. Rev. satrap's head. Storrs Coll.; Schlessinger 13, Feb. 4, 1935, 725, 4.20
b. Rev. satrap's head. Commerce (Asia Minor 1961); Turin, 3.77|; Turin, 4.14|
Staters
a. Rev. cornucopia. *ANS, 8.54|; The Hague; Commerce (Basel 1971), 8.59
364. Rev. shell. ""Leningrad; commerce (N. Greece), 8.58; Auctiones Basel 4, Nov. 26, 1974, 91
369a. Rev. shell. *Leningrad (Anadol), Pridik 67; commerce (Basel 1971), 8.51
370a. Rev. of 369b. ANS, 8.54 S; Hirsch, Apr. 4, 1960, 133a = Glendining, Mar. 7, 1957, 17,
8.54
371. Rev. of 370b. ""Leningrad = Hess 208, Dec. 14, 1931, 265
Abydus
Drachms
b. Hersh Coll.
b. Vienna, 4.10|
b. ANS, 4.03|
b. ANS, 4.17\
b. ANS, 4.07|
393. Leningrad
Staters
395. Obv. of 374.32 Rev. griffin's head. *Munich; SNGBerry 158, 8.57/
M A die break on the helmet crest to upper left, not visible on 374, proves the order of emission.
62
397a. Rev. of 396b. *Commerce 1921 (MarSsesti), Poenaru Bordea 16, 8.51|; Bucharest cast
c. Rev. cornucopia. *Paris; Leningrad, 8.56|; ANS 8.55| ["Elder Sale 1017 Apr. 1913,"
399. Rev. of 397c. *Hess, Dec. 18, 1933, 57 = Dupriez 112, Apr. 7, 1913, 101
Drachms
400. Obv. of 360. Rev. satrap's head. *ANS, 4.15|; ANS, 3.58|
403. Rev. griffin's head. *ANS (Armenak), 4.16|; ANS (Asia Minor 1961), 4.27/
Lysimachus Drachms
404. Obv. of 402. Rev. to l., forepart of lion over M in wreath; below stool,? ""Leningrad
405. Obv. of 403. Rev. to l., forepart of lion over W; below stool, griffin's head.
Like the earlier sequence, the second section of the coinage is extensively die linked as shown
XI.
XII.
XIII.
XIV.
XV.
XVI.
XVII.
XVIII.
XIX.
XX.
M, pentagram
Male head
Lion
HI
i?p
M, pentagram
i*i
rE
M or M in wreath
Lysimachus
Series XIV alone has no link with another series but its position in the sequence is supported
XII.
XIII.
XIV.
XV.
leaf, Z
leaf
leaf, I or
leaf, t
A or 1
Another noteworthy issue is Series XVII which is identical in its major control (M, pentagram)
with the last emission before the death of Philip III (Series XI). That these are two separate
strikings is certain. The Philip issue is linked at both ends with other series while Series XVII
begins the closely joined sequence which ends the coinage. Two of the secondary controls of
Series XI (serpent and cornucopia) continue to be used in Series XVII; two new ones (shell and
83 Outer brackets are drachm links, inner ones arc stater transfers.
Abydus
0:5
goat's head) are added. With Series XVIII the griffin's head and the satrap's head appear for
Unlike the diversity of major controls which characterizes the earlier sequence, the final issues
from Abydus (Series XIV-XX) are marked by monograms in which the letter M is the dominant
No.
Obv.
Rev.
No. Obv.
Rev.
No.
Obv.
Rev.
Coins
Dies
Dies
Coins Dies
Dies
Coins
Dies
Dies
I:
13 5
50
22
34
II:
Hermes
Forepart Pegasus
67
28
40
III:
Palm tree
51
14
IV:
AY
17
10
V:
14
13
64
point would have needed a substantial amount of coinage to meet the demand, more it seems
than even its greatly increased activity could supply. A newly opened mint at neighboring
Abydus was provided with a stater die from Lampsacus and its tetradrachm dies may have come
The date of 325 for the beginning of the Abydus coinage is supported by the evidence of the
crucial Asia Minor 1964 Hoard.35 It contained 32 drachms of Abydus: 8 with Hermes, 20 with
Pegasus forepart, 3 with palm tree, and 1 with AY (the last four from an obverse die carried over
from the Pegasus issue). All coins are in excellent condition and could have circulated for only a
short time before burial ca. 321 B.C. The Saida Hoard was probably buried at about the same
time but there is no definitive record of its contents. It is said to have included examples of the
After two emissions with only the name of Alexander, Philip II staters appear and continue to
be struck for an additional seven issues, apparently in an attempt to strengthen the validity of
Philip Arrhidaeus's claim to the throne. Toward the end of the joint regency there are also
staters of Alexander type inscribed OlAinnOY. Eleven series are involved but only four or five
are substantial strikings. The first two issues would immediately precede Alexander's death and
the last two probably cover two full years immediately preceding the assassination of Philip III.
During the interval one assumes that the remaining seven issues were emitted as coinage was
Despite the die linkage between Series XI and XII, I believe that the two issues were
separated by about six years. The death of Philip III ushered in a period of uncertainty during
which there was no central authority and hence no monetary direction. This ended at
Lampsacus and Sardes when Antigonus gained firm control ca. 310 B.C. and at that time
coinage resumed. The tetradrachm, heretofore a rare denomination, reappeared and different
Although it cannot be proved, it is logical to suppose that the overall situation affected
Abydus as well as neighboring Lampsacus. Here, too, one notes a revival of tetradrachm
coinage with Series XII and new symbols supplementing the major control marks of this and
subsequent issues. The die linked sequence of Series XV-XX points to continuous production
from ca. 307 to the time of Lysimachus and it is highly probable that Series XII-XIV, although
not linked to the later issues, belong with them, filling the gap between 310 and 307.
It is easy to postulate what happened. After Series XI had been struck there were still at least
three dies (173-75) in good condition, too good to be discarded. These were stored against future
needs and when restriking did resume, they were used for Series XII. One stater die (173) soon
wore out and its reverse was transferred to 171, which was still capable of producing the few
In the summer of 302 Lysimachus crossed the Hellespont, landing near Lampsacus which
threw open its gates without resistance (Diod. 20.107). The powerful fortress of Abydus was
besieged but held out, defended as it was by Antigonid troops and supported by the presence of
Demetrius's fleet. It was only after Ipsus that Lysimachus was able to gain control of the city
and use its mint for his own coinage, die linked to that of the last issue of Abydus in the present
catalogue.
I: Hermes
325/4
324/3
Abydus
III:
Palm tree
IV:
AY
V:
323/2
VI:
to
VII:
171, star
320/19
VIII:
Horse's leg
IX:
Grain ear
X:
319/8
XI:
M, pentagram
318/7
XII:
Male head
310/9
XIII:
Lion
309/8
XIV:
308/7
XV:
307/6
XVI:
306/5
XVII:
M, pentagram
305/4
XVIII:
i*1
304/3
XIX:
l*E
303/2
XX:
M in wreath
302/1
HOARDS
Hoards of gold and of silver have been separated and are presented here in roughly chronolog-
ical order of burial. Whenever possible their contents are associated with coins as enumerated in
the catalogues of Lampsacus and Abydus. The descriptions and references included in IGCH
ALPHABETICAL LISTING
Page
Gold Hoards
Anadol
70
68
69
68
68
68
69
68
70
70
71
70
69
67
Cavalla
Corinth 1938
Demanhur
Egypt 1894
Egypt 1912
Epidaurus
Gordion
Izmit
75
72
77
76
72
72
72
75
75
72
73
73
74
77
74
Eskisehir
Glldfiu
Greece 1912-13
Jasna Poljana
Larnaca
Lergutsa
Maeander Valley
Malko Topolovo
Katd Paphos
MdrSsesti
Kuft
N. Greece
Lamia
Paeonia
Larissa
Saida
Megara
Silver Hoards
Mosul 1862
75
68
Lampsacus
Foreparts of horses, t, 96
The hoard consisted of Philip II staters, of which two issues are relevant.
Lampsacus
A, serpent
Abydus
Lampsacus
Foreparts of horses, *, 89
Abydus
M, serpent, 139d
Lampsacus
A, head, 116e
X, A, 183b, 185
Abydus
Hermes, I, 2
M, star, 105a
M, serpent, 139b
Lampsacus
Horses, *, 106a
A, head, 110c
A, serpent, 126a
*, A, 168
.t, A, 177
Abydus
Grain, A, 126b
II
ii
Hoards
69
This unusual hoard, found at the site of ancient Dorylaeum, consisted of ca. 80 staters, of
1 Philip II W, 96
All 58 Philip III staters listed here belong to the issue of 319/8 B.C.; the four earlier coins can
be dated to the preceding two years. Presumably this was part of a single large shipment of gold
sent to Dorylaeum ca. 317 B.C., probably at the behest of Antigonus who at that time controlled
Many of the Lampsacus and Abydus coins in the Sotheby, Apr. 16, 1969, and Parke-Bernet,
Dec. 9, 1969, sales can be associated with entries in the present catalogue.
Lampsacus
1 A, head
2 A, serpent, 126c
Abydus
1 Hermes, I, la
1W
On the basis of Martin Price's listing ("Greek Coin Hoards in the British Museum," NC 1969,
Lampsacus
A, serpent
Forepart of Pegasus, Al
Abydus
Forepart of Pegasus, A
M, star, 104a
Grain, A, fulmen
Grain, P
70
M, cornucopia
M, pentagram, cornucopia
i*i, cornucopia
PE, cornucopia
rt, shell
Lampsacus
A, serpent, 122b
Serpent, 158
Abydus
W, cornucopia, 147
Lampsacus
A, 182c
Abydus
Two Abydus staters from this late hoard can be identified with catalogue entries.
Grain, P, 127a
The following entries in the present catalogue can be linked with this hoard on the basis of
Pridik's illustrations:
Lampsacus
J\ A. 175a. Pridik 9
Hoards
71
Abydus
Eight staters of Lampsacus and nine of Abydus are listed by Poenaru Bordea. Most can be
Lampsacus
\, A, 188
^, A, 195a, 197b
^, 200
Kl, M, 287
Abydus
Forepart of lion, i*i, griffin's head, Poenaru Bordea 19-20 (not illus.)
SILVER HOARDS
Lampsacus
2 Club, 60a-60b
Abydus
20 Forepart of Pegasus, 31a, 32a, 37a (2), 38, 40 (2), 42, 43 (3), 48a, 50 (2),
1 AY, 77a
72
This large hoard, now dispersed, contained one tetradrachm of Lampsacus (Caduceus, A/) and
Another large hoard, very similar in composition to the one preceding, contained two tetra-
Lampsacus
Caduceus, 3
Club, 5a
Demeter, *, 23a, 27, 28d, 31c, 32d, 33, 37a-c, 38a, 40a, 42b-d
Abydus
Hermes, 5b, 6
Palm tree, 63
Abydus
Lampsacus
The IGCH cites two tetradrachms of Lampsacus but six in the ANS trays are labelled "Abu
Hommos."
Lampsacus
d'Alexandre III le grand que l'on trouve en Egypte," Annuaire de la Societe francaise
Lampsacus
2 Demeter,
Hoards
73
Lampsacus
3 Demeter, * A
1, A and Al
H, O
Amphora, H
Mouse
Head, leaf
Newell's suggested burial date is ca. 305 B.C. but, as noted in Sardes and Miletus, there are
coins from Lampsacus, Abydus, and Sardes which indicate that the deposit was interred ca. 300
Lampsacus
Demeter, *
Abydus
Hermes, 4
Lampsacus
XA
Mouse,
The burial date in IGCH is given as ca. 305 B.C. If the second Lampsacus drachm was struck
Other hoards laid away ca. 300 (Yunak through Aphrodisias) have a few identifiable coins of
Lampsacus
Abydus
Tetradrachm, head, X
Abydus
Head, X
74
Abydus
Tetradrachm, head, X
Lampsacus
Lamia: IGCH 93
Lampsacus
2 drachms, star in l. field and forepart of Pegasus, N. Price's burial date is ca. 310-300,
but even 300 B.C. seems a little early. The Pegasus issue is die linked with the first
Abydus
Drachm from the ME, leaf issue of 303/2. Burial before 300 B.C. is unlikely.
Lampsacus
2 Kl
Abydus
I, horse's leg
Lampsacus
VA
Kl, N
Amphora
Amphora, H
Amphora, O
Mouse, ME
Mouse
Forepart of Pegasus, Al
Abydus
Forepart of Pegasus, A
W, leaf, caduceus
I*, *
i9p, I
f$l, cornucopia
Hoards
75
Lampsacus
Kl, M=
Amphora, ME
Forepart of Pegasus, Al
Abydus
Lion, leaf
M, I
I*, I
Lampsacus
Demeter, *
6 Kl, M or r-E
Amphora, O
Mouse, ME
Forepart of Pegasus, AA
Abydus
M, leaf
ME, leaf
Lampsacus
Lampsacus
Lampsacus
Lampsacus
V Artemis, 269d
76
Abydus
IS1, star
M, leaf, 249a
M, I, 239
Lampsacus
t, 43b
A, 133e
J 237b, 282
Amphora, 388
Abydus
M, 219a, 265
W, 275, 279
pp, 307b
l*E, 388b
Lampsacus
Kl, l*E
Amphora, I^E
Forepart of Pegasus, AA
2 Forepart of Pegasus, N
Abydus
2 Lion, leaf
2 l*E, leaf
Lampsacus
Mouse, 419a
Abydus
Hermes, I, 29b
pp, 1, 294
pp. 2, 319
Abydus
pp, S, 314
Hoards
77
HOARD CHART
Drachms of Lampsacus and Abydus from the third-century hoards of Cavalla (IGCH 450),
Larissa (IGCH 168), and Armenak (IGCH 1423) are listed in the Hoard Chart which follows.
Publication data for the first and second are given in Sardes and Miletus, p. 97. For the third,
see M. Thompson, "The Armenak Hoard (IGCH 1423)," ANSMN 31 (1986), pp. 63-106.
Armenak coins seen and recorded by Newell but not purchased are indicated in parentheses.
Lampsacus Drachms
Sinan
Cavalla
Larissa
Armenak
I.
Caduceus
II.
Club
III.
Sword
(1)
IV.
Star
v.
30
1(12)
VI.
15
3(3)
VII.
Serpent
VIII.
3e
IX.
13
13(18)
X.
Kl
16
15
12(32)
XI.
AQ
XII.
PLATES
Plate 1
LAMPSACUS
Plate 2
LAMPSACUS
Plate 3
LAMPSACUS
Plate 4
LAMPSACUS
Plate 5
LAMPSACUS
Plate 6
LAMPSACUS
Plate 7
Plate 8
Plate 9
LAMPSACUS
LAMPSACUS
Plate 11
LAMPSACUS
LAMPS AC US
Plate 13
LAMPSACUS
Plate 14
LAMPSACUS
Plate 15
LAMPSACUS
Plate 16
LAMPSACUS
Plate 17
LAMPSACUS
Plate 18
LAMPSACUS
Plate 19
ABYDUS
Plate 20
ABYDUS
Plate 21
ABYDUS
Plate 22
ABYDUS
ABYDUS
Plate 24
ABYDUS
Plate 25
ABYDUS
Plate 26
ABYDUS
Plate 27
ABYDUS
Plate 28
ABYDUS
Plate 29
ABYDUS
Plate 30
ABYDUS
Plate 31
ABYDUS
Plate 32
ABYDUS
Plate 33
ABYDUS
Plate 34
ABYDUS