Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 19

Barron's Online - The Vision Thing -- Roundtable Part III Seite 1 von 19

Search Quotes & Research

Advanced Search i Symbol(s) n


j
k
l
m
n j Name
k
l
m
Home MONDAY, JANUARY 27, 2003 11:40 a.m. EST
This Week's Magazine FROM THE ARCHIVES: January 27, 2003 advertisement
Companies
Markets
Technology
The Vision Thing -- Roundtable Part III
Funds/Q&A From small stocks to big countries, our pros see enticing values
Market Lab
By LAUREN R. RUBLIN
Portfolio
Online Exclusives "IT'S ALL ABOUT making money, not about staying in the U.S. or on the moon or in Switzerland."
Past Editions An original thought, that, but not, alas, ours. Credit goes wholly to Marc Faber, born in
Switzerland, based in Hong Kong, and one of the planet's most worldly investors. Marc's point,
MarketGauge
quite simply: Don't be parochial about your portfolio. If the U.S. stock market is heading south -- its
See what stocks and
favorite direction for three years running -- head north, or east or west.
sectors are moving
today's markets.
It was the promise of just such uncompromising advice that led this magazine's editors just a few
FREE Markets Tools
blocks north of our familiar abode on Jan. 6 to meet with some bold and bright investors -- the
•Stock & Fund Listings
members of the Barron's Roundtable. (The whole illustrious crew is listed on the following page.)
•Economic Calendar
•Markets Calendar
The past two issues of Barron's have featured our panelists' views of the stock and bond markets,
Help the global economy, currencies, commodities and everything in between, as well as the 2003
Contact Us investment picks of most of the Roundtable members. In this week's installment, the final four --
Archie MacAllaster, Abby Joseph Cohen, Marc and Meryl Witmer -- have their say. Although the
picks of none save Marc's are far removed from U.S. equities, you'll find enough ideas in the pages
ahead to broaden your own world, not to mention your assets.

Barron's: Archie, what tempts you these days?

MacAllaster: Hub International. It's a Canadian company that transferred its home office from
Toronto to Chicago. Hub buys insurance brokers. It pays a dividend of C$0.28, which is about 18
cents U.S., and has 31 million shares outstanding. It's listed on the New York Stock Exchange and
the Toronto Stock Exchange, but trades on the Big Board and has a market value of $400 million.
The stock's 52-week high was 18.60 a share, and the low was 11.45. The shares were selling for
13.50 Friday [Jan. 3].

Q:What do the company's earnings look like?

http://online..../0,,SB1043459686648397144-search,00.html?collection=barrons%2F30day&vql_string=Zulauf%3Cin%3E%28article%2Dbody%2 17.02.2003
Barron's Online - The Vision Thing -- Roundtable Part III Seite 2 von 19

MacAllaster: About two months ago, Hub reported


third-quarter earnings, which were off by a penny from
estimates. The news cut the stock to 11 from 16 in
about two days. In 2002 the company probably earned
$1-$1.05 a share. This year, it should earn $1.15 to
$1.20, so it's selling for 11-11.5 times earnings. It is not
followed very widely. The stock sells for about half the
price/earnings multiple of a company like Hilb Rogal &
Hamilton, which has had a great history. In Hub's case, the quality is just as good. The
company has increased its premiums since 1998 by about 350%, having bought 80
different brokers. Just last week, it bought an insurance operation with about $25 million
in premiums, raising its total premiums to $225 million a year. Premiums in most
insurance fields have increased by 18%-22% in the past few years. Hub needs almost
no capital because it does no underwriting, so its margins are increasing. The stock is
worth 20 a share in the next 18 months.

Q: What is your next pick?


MacAllaster: Williams Cos. is a great speculation on natural gas. The stock went from
25-26 a share to less than a dollar, and now sells for 2.70-2.80. There are 515 million
shares outstanding. The company reduced its dividend, but still pays a penny a quarter.
Mind you, that's a yield of 1.5%. Williams is digging out from its troubles in California,
Marc Faber, Meryl Witmer, Archie Oregon and Washington, where it paid a penalty overcharging the states. Williams also
MacAllaster, Abby Joseph Cohen had an enormously profitable pipeline operation, with over 20,000 miles of pipelines. The
company had to sell some of these assets to Berkshire Hathaway, but it still has a lot of
assets. In addition, it's got about $1.6 billion in cash and credit lines, and $1.5 billion of
debt coming due in 2003, so it's in good shape. The problem is 2004.

Q: How so?
MacAllaster: In March of '04, it has to refinance Williams Communication, now WilTel Communications Group [which emerged from
bankruptcy on Oct. 15, and began trading on the Nasdaq Dec. 5.] Williams Cos. has about $3.5 billion in debt coming due in '04,
but by the end of this year they'll be showing solid earnings and will have no trouble refinancing. If they had to, they have lots of
assets to sell. Williams is the largest natural-gas producer in the U.S. By the end of this year, it will have 60 to 80 cents a share in
earnings. It's going to be at least a $7 stock within 18 months.

Gabelli: What is total debt?

MacAllaster: The company has about $14 billion in debt and tangible book value of $8.50 to $9 a share. On a yearly basis,
Williams has never shown a loss.

Neff: Is Williams out of energy trading?

http://online..../0,,SB1043459686648397144-search,00.html?collection=barrons%2F30day&vql_string=Zulauf%3Cin%3E%28article%2Dbody%2 17.02.2003
Barron's Online - The Vision Thing -- Roundtable Part III Seite 3 von 19

MacAllaster: No, they still have a problem. They're trying to sell their energy-trading operations, or find a partner.

Gabelli: The prices for pipelines have started firming. Southern Union is buying the CMS Panhandle Cos. in a very nice deal.
Multiples are going up. There is an opportunity to make a lot of money.
Subscribe
Digital Delivery MacAllaster: Agreed. Last year I recommended Radian Group, which did everything I said it would. It will report earnings of $4.45-
Advertise $4.50 a share for 2002. [Wednesday Radian reported earnings of $4.41 a share.] The stock was 41 last year, and it is now 37-38.
Customer Service
Reprints Roundtable Participants Q: So it did everything but go up.
MacAllaster: The market was down 20%-25%. This stock was down 5%-6%, so it held in
Corporate Reports pretty well. This year they'll make $5 a share. Radian is in the mortgage-insurance
BARTON BIGGS business, but it also guarantees tax-exempt bonds for cities. The company has much
Other Sites from
Dow Jones better balance than in the days when it did just one thing. Growth has averaged about
Founder and chairman, 12% a year for the past few years, and the company hasn't had a down year in 10 years.
CareerJournal Morgan Stanley Dean Witter
CollegeJournal Investment Management,
New York City Q: What has ailed the shares?
OpinionJournal MacAllaster: Worries that the boom in mortgage refinancings is going to end. The stock
Personal Technology moves in sympathy with stocks like Fannie Mae, which trades for about 10 times earnings.
SCOTT BLACK But this one trades for only eight times this year's earnings.
RealEstateJournal
StartupJournal Founder and president,
Last year I recommended Wells Fargo, and it was actually up. [The stock rose 7.06% from
Delphi Management; portfolio
MORE Jan. 7 through Dec. 31, 2002.] It trades for about 45-46 a share. It's got about 1.7 billion
manager,
Delphi Value Fund, Boston, shares outstanding, and is the fourth largest bank in the U.S. in terms of assets. Wells
Massachusetts raises its dividend every year. It pays $1.12 a share, and yields about 2.2%. The dividend
could go up 8-12 cents this year. Last year the company was expected to earn $3.30 a
share, and this year it's likely to earn $3.70. [Tuesday Wells reported 2002 earnings of
ABBY JOSEPH COHEN
$3.32 a share.] Here's a really telling figure: It makes almost 20% on capital, year after
year. You ought to buy the stock, pay cash for it, take it to the safe-deposit box and leave
Chair, investment policy committee, it alone.
Goldman Sachs,
New York City
Q: What do you think of banks generally?
MacAllaster: I liked them last year, and I still like them. They pay great dividends, and the
MARC FABER stocks are cheap. They trade for 12-13 times earnings. Actually, a lot of bank stocks are
cheaper than that. My next stock is FleetBoston Financial. Everything in the world went
Managing director, wrong with this company last year, and it still ought to make about $1.70 for the year. [On
Marc Faber Ltd., Jan. 16 Fleet reported net income of $1.44 a share from continuing operations.] It pays
Hong Kong $1.40 a share in dividends.

MARIO GABELLI Neff: Are they going to maintain the dividend?

Chairman, Gabelli MacAllaster: A lot of people say no. I say yes. I estimate they'll earn $2.60 a share for the
Asset Management,
year. If they come anywhere near $2.60, they are not going to cut their dividend. The
Rye, New York

http://online..../0,,SB1043459686648397144-search,00.html?collection=barrons%2F30day&vql_string=Zulauf%3Cin%3E%28article%2Dbody%2 17.02.2003
Barron's Online - The Vision Thing -- Roundtable Part III Seite 4 von 19

Rye, New York


stock sells for 26, or less than 10 times earnings. You've got two chances on this one.
Earnings are growing. Second, it's a natural for some large bank to acquire. They've taken
ARCHIE MacALLASTER an absolute bath in Argentina. That was part of last year's problem. They also took a bath
on Robertson Stephens, their former investment-banking business. But you've got a great
Chairman, MacAllaster chance here. It's cheap, it has a 5.5% yield and will be treated well if taxes on divdends
Pitfield MacKay, New York City are eliminated. And it could be very attractive to a bank like Citigroup or perhaps some
foreign bank.
JOHN NEFF
Table: Q: What would FleetBoston be worth in a takeover?
Retired portfolio manager, Roundtable 2002 Scorecard MacAllaster: About 42. Otherwise, it's good for
Vanguard Windsor Fund and Gemini II; 35 this year. My next pick is also a name from last
year: Old Republic International. They, too, did
managing partner (retired), everything I predicted, and they're going to make
Wellington Management, Radnor, $3.25-$3.30 a share for '02. This year they could make $3.45-$3.50. Old Republic has a
Pennsylvania book value of $26.50, and the stock sells for just over 27. It pays a dividend of 64 cents a
year -- 16 cents quarterly -- and it's been raising its dividend every year. I'm certain they
ART SAMBERG will raise it this year because their earnings are better. The company has 120 million
shares outstanding. They deal in three kinds of insurance: mortgage, title and general
insurance. The last accounts for about half their premiums but provides only 30% of their
Chairman and CEO,
Pequot Capital Management, earnings. This year the general insurance business probably will provide closer to 55% of
Westport, Connecticut earnings. Title insurance will be off some, and mortgage insurance will be flat.
Nonetheless, earnings should go from $3.25 to $3.50. Next, I've got a real speculation.
OSCAR SCHAFER
Q: Let's hear it.
MacAllaster: It's one with an E on the end [Nasdaq adds an E to a stock symbol if the
Managing Partner,
company is delinquent in filing an earnings report.] It's Nash Finch, NAFCE. The stock has
O.S.S. Capital
Management, fallen from 34 to 7. Book value is $18-$19 a share. The company is about to report
New York City earnings of $2-$2.10. Nash Finch is primarily a wholesale food company, though it also
owns stores. The company changed auditors last summer, and withheld its third-quarter
earnings report. Then it said its books had been inspected by the SEC. [The SEC is
MERYL WITMER
conducting an informal inquiry into the way it handled certain promotional allowances from
suppliers.] There's a chance Nash Finch might be delisted from Nasdaq. I don't think that
General partner, will happen. The company has 12-13 million shares outstanding. It's got over $4 billion of
Eagle Capital Partners, sales. It pays a 32-cent dividend. When they get around to filing in the next few weeks
New York City and report their third-quarter earnings, and do whatever is necessary to satisfy the SEC,
the stock will be worth more than $7. Looked at another way, this company is selling in
FELIX ZULAUF the stock market for less than $100 million, and it's generating more than $4 billion in
sales.
Founder and president,
Zulauf Asset Management, Originally, Fleming [the nation's largest grocery distributor] got in trouble for sort of
Zug, Switzerland stealing from customers. The SEC started asking others in the industry if they were doing
the same thing. This happened about a month before Nash Finch changed auditors.

Q: Why did they make the change?


MacAllaster: I am not sure. The new auditors said, "Look, we're going to go through this before we get ourselves in trouble." You

http://online..../0,,SB1043459686648397144-search,00.html?collection=barrons%2F30day&vql_string=Zulauf%3Cin%3E%28article%2Dbody%2 17.02.2003
Barron's Online - The Vision Thing -- Roundtable Part III Seite 5 von 19

MacAllaster: I am not sure. The new auditors said, "Look, we're going to go through this before we get ourselves in trouble." You
can't blame them after what happened to Arthur Andersen. So that's what they've done. As I say, it's a speculation. But it's 7 a
share, and sales are 40 times market value.

Q: Thanks, Archie. Abby, how about you?


Cohen: We think the U.S. economy looks far better than other developed economies in four areas. One, our banking system has
had tough-love regulation from the Fed and other regulators for at least five years. Bank managers themselves have done a very
good job focusing on credit-quality control. The second interesting contrast between the U. S. and other major economies has to
do with labor productivity. Technically, short-term productivity measures look better because of weak hiring trends. But the
important story is the long-term improvement in productivity, bolstered by a high capital-to-labor ratio, in which workers are given
good equipment and other resources to work with. Third, over the past several years, as the U.S. economy has restructured,
we've been focusing on something economists refer to as comparative advantage, instead of simple competition.

Q: Meaning what?
Cohen: That it's okay for us to import inexpensive manufactured goods from China,
because we'll use our most precious resources, our people and our capital, to produce
higher-value-added goods and services. That's why one of my biggest concerns is poor
economic conditions in Europe and Japan, the natural markets for our more expensive
items.

Fourth, there's been a great deal of discussion about the problems in U.S. accounting.
But 2002 was the year of inflection. The bad guys did the perp walk, and other
companies that should have been more conservative in their accounting made some
significant adjustments. This year there will be a lot of discussions between the FASB
[Financial Accounting Standards Board] and the International Accounting Standards
Board [IASB] about harmonizing standards. Outside the U.S. there currently are no
international standards for pensions and consolidation-accounting.

Q: That's a gross exaggeration.


Cohen: Some nations do have standards, but the IASB does not. To return to my
broader view, we felt last year that it was important to have geopolitical hedges in our
portfolio. I recommended exposure to energy through the commodities markets and an
energy stock [ChevronTexaco ]. This year, we think energy prices will be above the low
$20s, due to concern about developments in the Middle East and Venezuela. Prices
could spike dramatically on these geopolitical developments. We are still recommending
some exposure to commodities, but by and large the equity markets are a good place to
Abby Joseph Cohen be. We expect equities will outperform the fixed-income market, particularly the Treasury
market. We're looking for stocks with economic sensitivity, such as Bank of America,
which trades for 12 times earnings. It's got a 3.5% yield and an 18% estimated return
on equity.

Q: Your energy pick, we should mention, was selling for 89.72. Now it's about 66.
Abby Cohen's Picks
Cohen: While the spot markets have moved higher, investors are not treating the shares
as if commodity prices are going to stay at those levels. In particular, ChevronTexaco had
Company Symbol 1/6/03 some merger-related disappointments.

http://online..../0,,SB1043459686648397144-search,00.html?collection=barrons%2F30day&vql_string=Zulauf%3Cin%3E%28article%2Dbody%2 17.02.2003
Barron's Online - The Vision Thing -- Roundtable Part III Seite 6 von 19

Company Symbol 1/6/03


Price
Bank of America BAC $71.25 This year, we believe the worst is over for the U.S. economy. Another more cyclically
sensitive name is Delta Air Lines. The stock has been very hard-hit and is already pricing in
Delta Air Lines DAL 13.35
concerns about higher oil. The stock has a 1.6% yield, but it's the underlying company
Waste Mgmt WMI 23.76 that's most interesting to us. Leisure travel began to pick up during the holiday season.
Should business confidence begin to pick up from currently anemic levels, not only would
Viacom VIA/B 43.36
we see some improvement in capital spending, but we might begin to see business travel
Rohm & Haas ROH 33.69 pick up. Our analyst believes Delta has the strongest balance sheet in the industry and
Parker Hannifin PH 48.80 the best control over its costs.

Danaher DHR 67.98


Schafer: Abby, what is the impact on Delta of UAL's bankruptcy filing?

Cohen: The workforce at Delta is about 90% nonunion, so it could put some pressure on the company.

But before I go further, I neglected to do mention something on behalf of my legal department. No. 1, I am not the analyst on any
of these stocks. No. 2, one should presume that Goldman Sachs either had, has or would like to have an investment-banking
relationship with any company I mention.

Q: Is there any company that Goldman wouldn't like a banking relationship with?
All: WorldCom!

Zulauf : If you do business in the U.S., you have one businessman and 10 lawyers. If you do business in Asia or Europe, it's just
the opposite.

Cohen: My next stock is Waste Management, which was held in low regard for a long period of time. There were concerns about
management controls and activities. There were concerns about accounting, which our analyst believes has now been cleaned up.
Waste Management has about a 25% market share and fairly high SG&A [sales, general and administrative expenses], which the
analyst views as positive. They boosted SG&A as they tried to get controls in place. This now creates an opportunity to lower
costs. There is also an opportunity for price increases, if economic activity picks up and more solid waste is generated. Waste
Management has an ROE and long-term earnings growth of about 15%.

We are not enthusiastic about the consumer. We are not interested in consumer staples, and we recently became much less
enthusiastic about autos, housing and retailing because this area of the economy already has done reasonably well. We're looking
for things related to consumer service. Delta falls into that category, as does Viacom, which I mentioned last year. To update you,
our analyst thinks Viacom has low-double-digit long-term earnings growth. Most of its cash flow comes from the cable and radio
businesses. The stock was 43 on Friday [Jan. 3].

Q: And 46 last year.


Cohen: Rohm & Haas is another cyclical company, a very broad-based specialty-chemical company. It's been under some pressure,
as many investors have focused in on some of the less cyclically sensitive names in the area. If the economy is, in fact, looking
better, we may see some movement and interest here. The stock yields 2.5%, and long-term earnings growth is about 9%.

http://online..../0,,SB1043459686648397144-search,00.html?collection=barrons%2F30day&vql_string=Zulauf%3Cin%3E%28article%2Dbody%2 17.02.2003
Barron's Online - The Vision Thing -- Roundtable Part III Seite 7 von 19

Schafer: They have a big exposure to electronics, too. If that turns around, it should be good.

Cohen: Exactly. The company and stock have been under pressure in part because of the electronics business and because of
rising energy prices. But investors are cognizant of the risk.

Neff: What is the P/E on 2003 earnings?

Cohen: Rohm & Haas sells for 16 or 17 times estimated earnings, which is high relative to commodity chemicals but not relative to
specialty chemicals stocks. With regard to capital-goods stocks, our analysts also like Parker Hannifin and Danaher. These
companies will benefit should there be some modest improvement in capital-goods spending, but we may not see this for the next
few months.

Q: Okay. Now, let's hear from Marc.


Archie MacAllaster's Picks
Faber: First, I am surprised by the complacency that exists about the U.S. dollar. Last year
in Argentina the stock market was up 77% in domestic currency, but down 55% in euros.
Maybe the U.S. stock market will go up this year in U.S. dollar terms, but adjusted for the Company Symbol 1/6/03
price of a stable currency such as gold, or possibly the euro or the yen, it might have Price
negative returns. Last year in euro terms the Dow Jones Industrial Average was down
Hub Intl HBG $13.40
29%, the Nasdaq 41% and the S&P 35%. You had a weakening stock market and a
weakening currency. Williams Cos WMB 2.71
Radian Group RDN 40.25
Schafer: But what difference does that make except for people who travel? Wells Fargo WFC 48.84
FleetBoston Fincl FBF 27.46
Faber: An American could have bought a euro and kept it in cash, and made 16%, instead
of losing 29% on the Dow Jones. Or, he could have bought German bunds and made 28%. Old Republic Intl ORI 30.27
People should be concerned about making money, not about whether they stay in the Nash Finch NAFCE 7.89
U.S. or on the moon or in Switzerland. That's why I want to focus first on some macro
plays.

In 1982, I was invited to a seminar in Hong Kong. I had to speak about bonds in the afternoon. In the morning, there was a
session about energy and oil stocks, and gold and gold shares, and attendance was approximately 500 people. In the afternoon I
had one attendant, and he stayed out of politeness.

Zulauf : That was a great signal.

Faber: I should have asked for his signature. Today, if you go to investment seminars,
even where people traditionally have been positive about gold, and ask how many have
more than 1% of their assets in gold, only one or two hands go up in a crowd of 200-
300 people. The world is grossly underweight gold.

If a bubble is created in an investment sector, there is an undervaluation created

http://online..../0,,SB1043459686648397144-search,00.html?collection=barrons%2F30day&vql_string=Zulauf%3Cin%3E%28article%2Dbody%2 17.02.2003
Barron's Online - The Vision Thing -- Roundtable Part III Seite 8 von 19

somewhere else. Once the bubble bursts, there is always a change in leadership. But
the change can occur over many years. Bonds bottomed in the U.S. in September 1981,
and then rallied strongly into 1983, before totally collapsing once again. There was huge
upheaval in the bond market, and Lehman Brothers almost went bankrupt. But then the
market started to turn around, and bonds rallied for years, until recently.

Q: Are you predicting a similar trajectory for gold?


Faber: Gold was up slightly more than 20% last year, and is up 40% from its lows. We
could see a big setback in prices because the bullish consensus now is very high. But
that doesn't change the fact that the 30-year bear market in commodities and grains
that started in 1973 -- and for cocoa and coffee, in 1977 -- is running out of steam.
Therefore, I would emphasize commodities, as well as commodity-related stocks and
countries. Not everybody can store five tons of coffee at home.
Marc Faber
Let's take coffee. In Switzerland, per-capita consumption is 50 times higher than in
China, but the Chinese population is 200 times larger than Switzerland's. Forty years
ago, the Koreans and Japanese drank hardly any coffee. But per-capita consumption in Japan and South Korea has gone up
dramatically in the past 10-20 years, and is 10 times higher than in China. People complain that China is exporting deflation in the
manufacturing sector. We also have to focus on the rising standard of living in China. One of the best ways to play that is through
commodities, whether coffee, wheat, corn, soybeans, meat or oil.

Q: And gold?
Marc Faber's Picks
Faber: There has been a great increase in paper money per unit of gold and silver in the
world. That's why gold is becoming relatively rare, along with other hard assets. Asian
Company Symbol 1/6/03 central banks have practically no gold holdings. Japan has 1.8% of its foreign exchange
Price reserves in gold, China 2.1%, Taiwan 3%, Singapore 1.7%, Thailand 2.32% and Malaysia
1%.
PRECIOUS
METALS
Also, when we talk about future dollar weakness, what is the implication for Europe? I am
Gold - $351.25
much more positive about the future of Euroland than most people are. The inclusion of 10
Silver - $4.90 new countries, and the eventual inclusion of Russia and Turkey, will be very beneficial. It
Newmont Mining NEM $29.25 will create a huge economic zone and kill the unions in the West and enlarge the market
dramatically. There will be a dramatic conversion play. In 2002, Romania's market went up
Harmony Gold HMY rand 100%, Bulgaria's more than 50% and Slovakia's around 50%. The real estate in these
Mining 15400 countries is very cheap compared with Western Europe. There will be an arbitrage similar
COMMODITIES to that between Chinese real estate and real estate in Hong Kong. People living in
Western Europe should consider buying real estate on the Dalmatian Coast in Croatia,
Merval Argentina MAR 508.26
because it is much closer to Germany than, say, southern Spain. If you look at what's
Idx
happened to real-estate prices over the past 20 years in Mallorca and southern Spain,
IRSA Inver. IRS $5.82 you can imagine what will happen in some of these eastern European countries. There are
Cresud CRESY $5.20 very dramatic opportunities in real estate in emerging economies, not just in Europe but
Asia.
Schlumberger SLB $42.40
Diamond Offshore DO $22.05 Q: What do you make of silver? It has hardly moved by comparison with gold.

http://online..../0,,SB1043459686648397144-search,00.html?collection=barrons%2F30day&vql_string=Zulauf%3Cin%3E%28article%2Dbody%2 17.02.2003
Barron's Online - The Vision Thing -- Roundtable Part III Seite 9 von 19

Pohang Iron and St. O549 KS won Faber: Silver has very good potential. The fundamentals near term are more favorable
124500 than for gold, because you don't get central-bank selling in silver.
BHP Billiton (ADR) BHP $11.55
Zulauf : There is a production deficit in silver, and inventories around the world have been
Tatneft (ADR) TNT $15.27 coming down. The supply/demand situation is presenting a pretty bullish picture for the
ASIA coming years.
People's Food PFH SP S $.735
Faber: Everyone says we'll need less photography paper as digital photography takes
Brilliance China 1114 HK HK $1.53 hold. But if people print out their photographs, they need silver-coated paper. If anything,
Auto
that is rather positive for silver.
Travelsky 696 HK HK $5.55
Next Media Ltd. 282 HK HK $1.74 Anyway, you can play commodities through the purchase of physical gold, and I would
encourage every responsible citizen in this world to buy physical gold and silver and store
Singapore Telecom ST SP S $1.22
it in a safe-keeping box in a country that is friendly to gold and silver holdings. You can
PT Telekom TLKM IJ rupiah also buy gold shares, although they have not performed well recently, considering that
Indonesia 3550 gold has made a new high. Gold shares are lower than they were last summer, which is a
Siam Commercial SCB TB baht 30.25 negative technical signal. Nonetheless, if you want to buy stock in a company with huge
Bank exposure to gold, consider Newmont Mining and Harmony Gold Mining. Harmony is run by
my friend Adam Fleming. It has acquired assets at very low prices over the last few years,
Thai Farmers Bank TFB TB baht 27.75 and it is unhedged.
Reliance Industries RIL IN rupee
284.85 The other way to play commodities is to buy the Argentine stock market. Argentina is the
State Bank of India SBIN IN rupee purest play on grain prices. If they recover, Argentina will do extremely well. Its stock
279.00 market was overpriced before, but now it is undervalued.
Dr. Reddy's Labs DRRD rupee
IN 921.60 Black: The country's middle class has been wiped out, and there is a huge exodus of
people from the country.
The India Fund IFN $10.62
India Growth Fund IGF $9.96
Faber: Argentina is a boom and bust economy par excellence. I went there for the first
Asia Pacific Fund APB $9.27 time in 1988. Everything looked grim, and valuations were extremely low. The bankers in
Greater China Fund GCH $9.07 Geneva said: 'This is a country where we only take out money. We will never invest a
penny.' Then the market went up more than 30 times. Argentina's stock market won't go
Apollo Fund APOL CY CYP .17 up thirtyfold from here, but it can easily double in dollar terms. Both the property and
Source: Bloomberg share markets are incredibly inexpensive. There are two commodities-related companies
listed on the New York Stock Exchange. IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones has a
market capitalization of slightly under $100 million. Cresud is the largest agricultural land
owner in Argentina. Both are controlled by Eduardo Elsztain, a very successful fund
manager. Both own office buildings in Buenos Aires. As for the country's currency, in 1997 per capita income in Argentina was
almost twice as high as in Mexico. Now per capita income is lower than in Nicaragua and Bolivia.

It is very bullish for Argentina and for all emerging markets if they default on their debts, because then they're essentially debt-
free and can start anew. Don't forget that well-to-do Argentines probably have about $60 billion to $80 billion outside the country,
which they will bring back if they see the opportunity arise.

http://online..../0,,SB1043459686648397144-search,00.html?collection=barrons%2F30day&vql_string=Zulauf%3Cin%3E%28article%2Dbody%2 17.02.2003
Barron's Online - The Vision Thing -- Roundtable Part III Seite 10 von 19

Q: What will make them bring that money home?


Faber: At the bottom of a bear market you never see why it should go up. Then something happens and the money starts to flow.
What will restore confidence? Low valuations. In Argentina, low valuations are there.

Q: But isn't the banking system broken?


Faber: It's finished. That's why I wouldn't be too bullish about the American banking system, either. It can happen here with all
the derivatives and real-estate loans and so forth. I would be short the homebuilding and financial stocks in the U.S., relative to
the S&P.

Last year, incidentally, the South African rand was the strongest currency against the U.S. dollar. The next strongest were the
Norwegian krona and Swedish krona, the Swiss franc and the euro. The net liabilities of the U.S. to the rest of the world are now
25% of GDP. If the current rate stays at 5% of GDP over the next five years, the net liability will increase to 50%. This is not
sustainable. Until 1997, the current account deficit ran at only 1.5% of GDP. America's overall market share in export markets fell
from 25% in 1998 to around 21% now. If the U.S. really focused on sectors where it has a comparative advantage, this wouldn't
have happened. The U.S. is not very competitive.

Gabelli: We are the most competitive nation in the world in agriculture.

Faber: That's not true. Cotton is subsidized. A lot of U.S. agriculture is subsidized.

Gabelli: Some $55 billion of our exports are agriculture. The next big thing is movies and entertainment.

Q: If commodities prices rise, won't that act to the advantage of the U.S. trade balance? If China demands more, won't we be the
breadbasket for China?
Faber: The Chinese will be buyers of some agricultural products from the U.S., but the main beneficiaries will be other countries in
Asia. For oil, Indonesia. For agricultural products, Australia and New Zealand. And for coffee, Vietnam. The Chinese will become the
largest customers of other Asian countries. And, as such, they will have more and more political power around Southeast Asia.

The main beneficiaries of rising commodity prices are Argentina, Brazil, Russia, Indonesia, Malaysia and to some extent Thailand
and the Philippines, Australia, Canada and New Zealand. If you believe that the bear market in commodities ended sometime
between 2001 and 2002, you should be long currencies such as the New Zealand dollar, which actually performed very well since
the start of last year. That also holds for the Australian dollar and probably the Canadian dollar.

Q: The Australian and New Zealand dollars are both up about 20%-25%. They're almost becoming noncompetitive, especially Australian
wheat versus Argentine wheat.
Faber: That's why I recommended Argentina. But currencies in Australia and New Zealand are relatively cheap compared to the
U.S.

Earlier [in the first installment of the Roundtable, in our Jan. 13 issue], I said oil would go to $90 a barrel. That is not an actual
forecast, but in the long run the demand for oil will rise dramatically in Asia, in South Korea and in Japan. In the case of Japan,
between 1950 and 1978, per-capita consumption increased from one barrel to 15 barrels. In the case of South Korea, it increased

http://online..../0,,SB1043459686648397144-search,00.html?collection=barrons%2F30day&vql_string=Zulauf%3Cin%3E%28article%2Dbody%2 17.02.2003
Barron's Online - The Vision Thing -- Roundtable Part III Seite 11 von 19

from a barrel in 1965 to around 17 barrels recently.

Q: Wouldn't such a huge rise in the price of oil have an impact on demand?
Faber: If the Chinese and Indian economies continue to grow at, let's say, 6% a year, the demand for industrial commodities will
be very strong, especially for oil. In China, consumption has doubled over the last seven years. In Asia, it could easily double over
the next 10 years, and double again. I agree that near term the price is vulnerable. Maybe you short oil if the U.S. goes into Iraq.
But I am not sure the war will be won.

Zulauf : The battle will be won.

Faber: The battle will be won, but whether the war will be won is a different story. One way to play the oil market is to buy oil-
service companies in the U.S. -- Schlumberger and Diamond Offshore. In Korea I would look at Posco [Pohang Iron and Steel], a
very efficient steel producer, though the price has gone up a bit. In Australia, there's BHP Billiton. In Russia, Tatneft. Also,
machinery companies and capital goods companies that produce machinery for both agriculture and mining equipment. Now, I have
some specifics about Asian companies.

Q: Let's hear them.


Faber: In 1990, most Asian stock markets peaked, including Japan. Thailand and Malaysia made marginal new highs in '94, and
Hong Kong made new highs in '97. But most moved in a band until 1997, before collapsing by 90%. The S&P 500, too, could be in a
trading range, say between 800 and 1,100, for a number of years before the final selloff. Whether the selloff comes in U.S. dollar
terms or through currency depreciation, as happened in Asia, we don't know. But there can be a delayed reaction. Japan peaked
at 39,000, in 1989, and then traded for a while around 20,000, before falling below 10,000.

Anyway, Asian markets have grossly underperformed the U.S. and the industrial markets of the West. Since 1990, in dollar terms,
most markets in the region are down by 80%. Now, the opening of China is both a threat and an opportunity for the other Asian
countries. It is a threat in the export markets, as most Asian countries are not competitive with China in manufacturing. Besides,
China is implementing huge improvements in its infrastructure.

Schafer: With the Olympics coming in 2008, they're really going to improve their infrastructure, which will make them even more
competitive.

Faber: So, how do you play China? In addition to the commodity markets, you buy companies that will benefit from the rising tide
of Chinese tourists into Southeast Asia. The Chinese will also have a Palm Beach and an Aspen and a C ôte d'Azur one day. You
buy real-estate and construction companies in China. A beer company, Tsingtao, has had some past problems, but has been
increasing its market share. In the past few years, it's gone from 2% to 12%. The P/E is 13, it yields about 5% and it is listed in
Hong Kong under the symbol 168. But I don't like Chinese companies, by and large.

Neff: Are most of them owned partly by the government?

Faber: Yes. Most have performed badly. But if you want to invest in China, People's Food is a stock to look at. It's listed in Hong
Kong, and sells for about HK$5. It's reasonably well run and yields 5.7%. The company buys slaughterhouses in China and
distributes meat and sausages. Brilliance China Automotive is a producer of minivans. Again, it's a controversial company, but if
someone wants to be in China, this is one of the plays.

http://online..../0,,SB1043459686648397144-search,00.html?collection=barrons%2F30day&vql_string=Zulauf%3Cin%3E%28article%2Dbody%2 17.02.2003
Barron's Online - The Vision Thing -- Roundtable Part III Seite 12 von 19

The growth of tourism is a no-brainer. Only 1% of the Chinese population travels overseas currently. That's 10 million visitors. In
Japan, it's around 40%, in South Korea and Taiwan, around 13%. In China the numbers could rise to 5%-10% over the next five,
10, 15 years. Then you're talking about 50 million to 100 million travelers. Plus, a huge domestic traveling industry is developing.
Travelsky provides information-technology solutions for the Chinese air-travel industry. The stock hasn't performed very well,
moving sideways in the past two-three years. But the valuation is relatively low, at about 11 times earnings.

Q: What is the valuation, or P/E, of the whole Chinese market?


Faber: That's not so easy to measure, because the A-shares market is still quite expensive. The B market and the H market -- H
being state-owned enterprises in Hong Kong -- trade for about 10 to 12 times earnings. Most of the companies that went public
were state-owned companies that were not particularly well-run. The very profitable companies are still private.

Neff: Why are we going through these companies if you don't think they're attractive investments?

Faber: If you want to invest in China, these names are the best of the crop. And Tsingtao, actually, could be quite a strong
performer. There are also some closed-end funds listed in Barron's that invest in China, such as the Greater China fund, run by
Barings.

I have another friend in Asia, Jimmy Lai, who came to Hong Kong at the age of 13. He produced garments for the Limited stores,
and then started a company called Giordano International and became quite famous. He was forced to sell his majority stake
because he was very critical of the Chinese government in 1989, during the Tiananmen uprisings. He then started Next magazine
in Hong Kong, and thereafter a daily paper called Apple Daily News, in which I have a biweekly column called "Sex, Investment and
Night Life."

Q: Sounds like your kind of column, Marc.


Faber: Within one year he was either No. 1 or No. 2 in the Hong Kong daily-paper market. This is an achievement to gain that kind
of market share in one year.

MacAllaster: Is this an English-language magazine?

Faber: No, Chinese. Next is now the most successful magazine in Hong Kong. But that market became a bit small for him, and he
moved to Taiwan and started a Next there. That magazine, too, is becoming very successful. His company, Next Media Limited, is
listed in Hong Kong. It sells for eight-nine times earnings estimates for 2004. Jimmy Lai has a head harder than the walls of this
hotel. He is one of a small crop of new entrepreneurs in Asia who didn't come from family wealth but built it up themselves and
succeeded in a very unusual way. You will see more and more of this Asian new guard, and they will change the political system in
due course.

Gabelli: What does the stock trade for?

Faber: It's HK$1.78. Moving on, in Singapore, I find Singapore Telecommunications quite interesting. It has performed quite
miserably. It's selling for about S$1.23 and yields 4%. The Singapore dollar will actually appreciate against the U.S. dollar, so this is
a rebound candidate that may be quite attractive. It is in fixed-line and mobile telephony and is also branching into Asia, so there

http://online..../0,,SB1043459686648397144-search,00.html?collection=barrons%2F30day&vql_string=Zulauf%3Cin%3E%28article%2Dbody%2 17.02.2003
Barron's Online - The Vision Thing -- Roundtable Part III Seite 13 von 19

isn't a huge risk. I am quite positive about Indonesia, which I mentioned a year ago. Since then, the market has gone up by more
than 30% in dollar terms. I like PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia , which is listed in New York under the symbol TLK. It sells for about
five times earnings. In a country with 200 million people, the growth prospects are reasonably good. If you get a rebound in
telecommunications stocks, this one will participate as well. It yields 4% and the market cap is about $4 billion, so it's quite a large
company.

Neff: Does it specialize in service or capital equipment?

Faber: Service. I also like pharmaceutical companies in Asia, because the per-capita consumption of pharmaceuticals is a tiny
fraction of what it is in the U.S. or Western Europe. My pick is Indopharma. The company has a market cap of about $80 million. It
trades for six-seven times earnings and yields 9%. About 50% of the company is still owned by the government, which will most
likely sell its share to a foreign pharmaceutical company. They will sell it for a significant premium to the present share price, so
there is little downside risk.

The competitive advantages of Thailand are tourism and hospitality, as well as agriculture. The county has experienced a crisis
post-1997. The economy is expanding slowly. The housing market is ready to be strong. The property market in Thailand will
improve, and the Thai banks as a group are attractive -- Siam Commercial Bank and Thai Farmers Bank in particular. Lastly, the
Indian stock market performed well last year. I am the chairman of a fund that was up 28%. It may be easier for foreigners to
make money in India than China, because there's less competition. This is a market to focus on in 2003.

Q: In other words, we should buy your fund?


Faber: I'm chairman of the Indian Capital fund. Companies to look at include Reliance Industries, State Bank of India and Dr.
Reddy's Laboratories. These are stocks people can buy easily.

Q: Are there other closed-end funds you'd recommend?


Faber: Sure. The Asia Pacific Fund, Greater China, India Growth. The India Fund sells for a 16.7% discount to net asset value. India
Growth sells at a 5% discount. Indian Capital, of which I'm the chairman, is run by John Thorne. It buys more special situations in
India. Then there are regional funds. Claire Barnes runs the Apollo Investment fund and was up 38% last year in Asia. As I've said,
emerging markets and commodities are beginning to outperform the U.S., and this outperformance will continue for a long time --
maybe five or 10 years.

Q: Thanks, Marc. Meryl, your turn.


Witmer: My first stock is Dade Behring, symbol DBEH. It's a $16 stock. It has 40 million shares outstanding, and a market cap of
$640 million. It trades in the pink sheets. They filed their 10(k) with the SEC and in a couple of weeks, with 400 shareholders, will
move to the Nasdaq.

Q: What does the company do?


Witmer: This is a classic razor/razor- blade business. They are one of the leading manufacturers and distributors of in vitro
diagnostic products worldwide. In other words, they make the machines and reagents used to test blood and other bodily fluids to
aid physicians in diagnosing, treating and monitoring patients. These are commonly used tests for glucose, cholesterol, drugs,
cardiac function and blood-clotting ability. They are typically performed in hospitals and reference labs. The machines are the
razors, and the reagents [the chemicals used in making analyses] are the blades. Dade's revenues are about 87% reagents,
consumables and service. A machine typically is placed in a lab under a five-year contract, and most machines can only use the

http://online..../0,,SB1043459686648397144-search,00.html?collection=barrons%2F30day&vql_string=Zulauf%3Cin%3E%28article%2Dbody%2 17.02.2003
Barron's Online - The Vision Thing -- Roundtable Part III Seite 14 von 19

manufacturer's reagents. This is what assures a steady stream of revenue and profits year in and year out.

Dade has a very strong market position in small and medium-sized hospitals where,
according to our research checks, the products and the company are very well thought
of. The company doesn't have a strong position yet in high-volume hospitals or the
reference-lab market. Dade's machines are superior to the competition's because of
their size and the number of tests they can perform. Dade's machines perform both
chemistry and immunochemistry tests, which allows a hospital to have one operator per
shift instead of two. This is a great savings, as an operator typically makes about
$80,000 a year. The machines are also very cleverly designed. They automatically divide
a sample for multiple tests, so the operator has to do very little.

Q: Tell us about the company's financials.


Witmer: Annual revenue is about $1.3 billion. My conservative Ebitda [earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization] estimate is about $240 million in 2003,
growing to $255 million in '04, and $275 million in '05. Growth is driven by increased
machine placements,and more testing, in general. Tests are growing 5% to 7% a year,
helped by the aging of the population and better tests. Dade invests a lot of money in
research and development, which is how they add incremental tests. The company also
has a net operating loss carryforward that lasts practically forever, about 30 years, and
adds about $12 million a year to after-tax free cash flow. Depreciation and amortization
are expected to be about $120 million, and capital spending is about $100 million to
$105 million, which adds another $12 million to after-tax free cash flow over reported
earnings per share.

Q: What do they earn per share?


Meryl Witmer Witmer: Dade will have about $1.20 of free cash flow a share this year, growing to
$1.38 in 2004 and jumping to about $1.82 in '05, when it should be able to refinance
some very high-cost debt that pays 11.9%. I dilute free cash flow per share for the
seven million options that were issued to employees upon the company's emergence from bankruptcy [in October 2002]. The
options strike at just under $15 a share. If all the options are exercised, the company would net over $2 a share.

Q: Is the balance sheet okay now?


Meryl Witmer's Picks
Witmer: It's okay. The company got rid of about half its debt. Debt is now a little under
$800 million. Ebitda is $240 million and interest expense is $70 million. That's decent
Company Symbol 1/6/03 coverage.
Price
Dade Behring DBEH $16.90 Schafer: The problem is, the company doesn't report any money in earnings per share. If
you fully tax them and take into account the interest costs, they earn 80 to 90 cents.
Investment Tech ITG 23.25
Group
Witmer: The depreciation and amortization is overstated, and in time will more closely
Interactive Data IDC 13.78
approximate actual capital spending. And an NOL with a 30-year life should legitimately be
Hunter Douglas HDUGF 29.75 added to earnings. It adds value. It's a great company. The hospitals love it. At the end of
2004, beginning of 2005, Dade is coming out with a high-volume machine for reference

http://online..../0,,SB1043459686648397144-search,00.html?collection=barrons%2F30day&vql_string=Zulauf%3Cin%3E%28article%2Dbody%2 17.02.2003
Barron's Online - The Vision Thing -- Roundtable Part III Seite 15 von 19

labs which may be superior to anything out there. The high-volume lab market is about
half the total market. Dade does not compete in the immunochemistry area in the high-volume market. Their growth should
accelerate greatly when they do. My target in two years is a 15 multiple. I'm putting a high multiple on the $1.82 a share in free
cash flow in 2005, plus the $2 they'd net in options proceeds, which yields a price target of 29.

Q: What is your next pick?


Witmer: My next two stocks are down because of pessimism about the U.S. stock market. For the first time in a few years I feel
the market is not overvalued, and could gain 5% to 15% a year for the next couple of years. When confidence in the markets is
restored, I think we'll see a resurgence in these two stocks. The first is Investment Technology Group, symbol ITG, and the other is
Interactive Data, IDC. ITG is a full-service trade-execution firm that uses technology to lower the cost of trading. It has an
electronic stock-crossing system called POSIT, which we love as investors in small- and mid-cap stocks. The POSIT system handles
about 600 shares a month and gets paid two cents a share on each side.

ITG also has client-site electronic trading products that manage trades and route orders automatically. The company's products
implement trading strategies automatically. These systems trade about 900 million shares a month. The trading desk trades about
300 million to 400 million shares a month. ITG has steadily grown its share of trading volume on the exchanges from about 2.3% in
1999 to 3% in 2002. The stock has gone down recently as volume on the exchanges has fallen.

Annual volume on the New York Stock Exchange has grown from five billion shares in 1975 to 308 billion shares in 2001. Nasdaq
volume has grown from one billion shares in '75 to 471 billion shares in '01. That's 17% growth annually for the New York Stock
Exchange over those 26 years, 21% over 10 years and 24% over five years.

Q: But these numbers were swelled by the bubble, so there's really no way to normalize them.
Witmer: There have been only three years in which volume did not grow. If the market does OK this year, then volume grows
again. And ITG has kept growing its share of trading volume.

Q: What did the company earn last year?


Witmer: To get a sense of the possible earnings, I looked at the last two quarters of 2002. The company reported 39 cents in the
third quarter and guided investors to 33 cents, the low end of the expected range, in the fourth. Annualizing these quarters, which
have been weak, you get $1.44 a share. To the $1.44 I add about 14 cents from cost-cutting. They have a European division that's
losing about 15 cents a share. So, for core EPS, I get $1.73. If it gets to 2% of share-trade volume only in England -- and England
is following the U.S. model in terms of growing nicely every year -- that would add 20 cents to earnings per share over time. That
still leaves the whole Continent as a potential future market. ITG also recently purchased a soft-dollar firm that has good
relationships with many hedge funds. Hedge funds account for about 25% of trading volume and are not well covered by the ITG
sales force yet. This acquisition should give ITG an opportunity to grow its volume in this area. ITG has about $6 a share of cash
and no debt. If trading volume continues on its historic growth path, ITG could trade closer to 35 or 40 a share. The stock is 22
now.

Q: That would seem to be a not ungenerous valuation for a trading stock.


Witmer: If you back out the $6 in cash, it's now around 10 times core earnings. That's a reasonable valuation. As for Interactive
Data, it is one of the best businesses I've ever owned, with one of the best managements. IDC supplies financial and business
information to institutional investors worldwide. It is the leading provider of end-of-day pricing, dividend and corporate-action
information. It provides real-time and historically archived data for use in portfolio pricing and analytics, as well as valuation
services to institutional equity and fixed-income portfolio managers. Its core competence is its extensive database expertise and

http://online..../0,,SB1043459686648397144-search,00.html?collection=barrons%2F30day&vql_string=Zulauf%3Cin%3E%28article%2Dbody%2 17.02.2003
Barron's Online - The Vision Thing -- Roundtable Part III Seite 16 von 19

technology reserves. Its computers are tied in directly with its clients' computers, so switching providers is very low on the list of
IT-department projects. And IDC is great on customer service. The company has a dominant market share. Its business is not
directly trading-volume sensitive, as it gets paid on a price-per-security basis. In the dismal environment of last year, it grew about
8% organically, and more than 12% including a small acquisition. It has a few new products that enable U.S.-based mutual funds
that own foreign stocks to price their funds accurately, and not get taken advantage of by traders who try to arbitrage the mutual-
fund price versus the foreign market.

Q: If Wall Street stops growing, the number of potential users is limited.


Witmer: The company is somewhat sensitive to the number of funds, because it has contracts with clearing firms and mutual-fund
companies. But it also has new products. IDC raises prices a little every year and continues to add markets and buy competitors.
When the company does an acquisition, it is ruthless about cutting costs. It gets great returns on capital invested in acquisitions.

Gabelli: Do they do pricing for hedge funds?

Witmer: They price each security. It is up to the fund manager to price his overall portfolio. After-tax free cash flow per share
should be about a dollar in 2003, growing to about $1.15 in '04. IDC is trading for about 11 times free cash flow, once you back out
the cash on its balance sheet.

This is a great bargain. Reported earnings are a little lower than free cash flow per share. The stock should trade at 17 times free-
cash-flow multiples, plus its cash. I have a $22 target in about year, and it's currently 14. Pearson owns about 60% of the
company.

Faber: Where was the stock two years ago?

Witmer: I first bought it at 5, and it has been as high as 20. Now it's at 14, and the numbers have grown a lot in the interim. It
should never have been at 5.

Q: It probably shouldn't have been at 20 either.


Witmer: That is probably right. It should have been at 15 at that point. Moving on, we talked earlier today about the fact that the
American consumer took a breather in the fourth quarter, which hurt consumer-sensitive stocks. Virtually everyone who has a
mortgage outstanding has refinanced, and many are using the savings to lower other debt. My next pick is in the beaten-down
consumer sector because consumer spending has a shot at starting to grow in mid-to-late 2003. Hunter Douglas, listed on the
Amsterdam Exchange, is one of our cheapest stocks. The company manufactures and markets window coverings and has about a
40% market share, compared to its nearest competitor, Newell Rubbermaid , with about 16%. The company has a 65% share of the
high-end market. Hunter is a very cheap stock.

The company has an investment portfolio whose cash value is listed on the books at $360 million. Some believe the market value is
$80 million to $100 million higher. It is invested in a wide variety of hedge funds and investment funds.

http://online..../0,,SB1043459686648397144-search,00.html?collection=barrons%2F30day&vql_string=Zulauf%3Cin%3E%28article%2Dbody%2 17.02.2003
Barron's Online - The Vision Thing -- Roundtable Part III Seite 17 von 19

From left: Marc Faber, Scott Black, Abby Joseph Cohen, John Neff, Art Samberg, Barton Biggs, Archie MacAllaster, Oscar Schafer, Felix
Zulauf , Meryl Witmer, Mario Gabelli

Faber: Actually, I know the family quite well. Their business in China is profitable. The company is very good. It is very clean.

Witmer: They know how to run a business. The stock trades at &euro:28 a share. My earnings-estimate range for this year is
&euro:2.90 to &euro:3.20 a share, though that estimate does not include any earnings from the investments. In '02 the company
is going to report &euro:2.70 to &euro:2.90 a share. If you assume a 12 multiple on the low point of my numbers and add the
cash, you get a target of &euro:43 a share. On the high end, you get a one-year target of &euro:50.

Q: Do they report their earnings from their portfolio?


Witmer: They do not, but starting in March they will report it at market value, which is good.

Black: What percentage of their revenue goes through Home Depot?

Witmer: Not much. You can go to a Home Depot or a Lowe's on the low end, but it is a pain to install. The Mom and Pop stores
come in and measure, and you get a window covering for anywhere from $100 to a $1,000.

Gabelli: How much of their business is in the U.S.?

Witmer: About 50% or 60%. They manufacture here and in the Netherlands.

Faber: But you are assuming a strong housing market.

http://online..../0,,SB1043459686648397144-search,00.html?collection=barrons%2F30day&vql_string=Zulauf%3Cin%3E%28article%2Dbody%2 17.02.2003
Barron's Online - The Vision Thing -- Roundtable Part III Seite 18 von 19

Witmer: Well, people change blinds when they move. And in the American economy, as you can see from cable-TV turnover, 1%-
1.5% of the people move every month.

MacAllaster: They run it like a private company.

Witmer: They do, and they should take it private.

Q: And we should take ourselves to dinner. Thank you all.

Barron's Roundtable 2003 -- Part I

Barron's Roundtable 2003 -- Part II

E-mail comments to editors@barrons.com

REPRINTS INFORMATION:
To distribute multiple copies of this article, visit the Dow Jones Reprints site .

Return To Top

Copyright © 2003 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Copyright information.

http://online..../0,,SB1043459686648397144-search,00.html?collection=barrons%2F30day&vql_string=Zulauf%3Cin%3E%28article%2Dbody%2 17.02.2003
Barron's Online - The Vision Thing -- Roundtable Part III Seite 19 von 19

http://online..../0,,SB1043459686648397144-search,00.html?collection=barrons%2F30day&vql_string=Zulauf%3Cin%3E%28article%2Dbody%2 17.02.2003

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi