Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
by David Boyce
been done as Our Lady requested. In his written reports, he had relied heavily
on the testimony of Sister Lucy's niece, Maria do Fetal, but this time he
answered, "I have that information from the Bishop of Leiria-Fatima and I have
documentation provided by the Prioress of the Coimbra Carmel." I expressed
surprise, saying that this information was not known in England as it surely
would be had the consecration been performed with due solemnity. At this, he
tensed and retorted that I must be taking my cue from Father Gruner. "No, I
have never read the writings of Father Gruner." He appeared annoyed. He said,
"I must attend to my young people." I was about to ask him another question
about the words of Sister Lucy's niece, Maria do Fetal, and about which this
Apostolic Delegate had supposedly visited Sister Lucy in 1984, Archbishop
Portaluppi or Archbishop Asti2 , as referred to in his own report, when he turned
his back on me and walked away.
Not a happy start to the inquiries I was hoping to make in Fatima, but at least
Father Fox's categorical statement that the Consecration had been done gave
me a useful approach when meeting the other people I wished to see, in the
company of my daughter Lucy.
act of March 25, 1984 is that it was not at all a consecration of Russia. This
objection he sought to eliminate by saying "at the moment when John Paul II
was to pronounce the word 'Russia' the loudspeakers were cut off and the Pope
mumbled in an inaudible manner".5
immediately replied without being asked, as did the other people I visited, that
they were authentic. Yes, Sister Lucy does use a word processor6 and is free to
write to anyone. However, he did not justify the errors contained in those
letters, such as the mention of a consecration of the world made by Paul VI in
1967, which is a pure invention. "The Carmel of Coimbra," he added, "passes on
to me certain letters addressed to Sister Lucy, especially the correspondence
concerning the causes of beatification of Francisco and Jacinta, to which I
myself reply." And these letters are passed to Father Kondor for him to answer
and sign with his own signature. I asked Father Kondor this question: "To whom
must one ask permission to speak to Sister Lucy?" He answered, "One must ask
only Cardinal Ratzinger, for neither the Bishop of Fatima nor the Bishop of
Coimbra can grant it."7 "But Sister Lucy is free to write. You can write her." I
remain surprised that we cannot converse with Sister Lucy but on the other
hand she can write very freely.
To have us believe that the act of 1984 has satisfied Heaven's demands, Father
Kondor has had a video made of himself reading to the Coimbra Carmelites the
text of the consecration of the world.
I showed Father Kondor a passage from an article by Father Antonio Maria
Martins entitled "Fatima Mensagem de Fe, Esperanca e Amor". This is the
passage:
"I am happy to report what was told to me by a friend who has several times
visited Sister Lucy in her Carmel at Coimbra: 'One day, he told me, I asked her:
Sister Lucy, the little shepherds are said to have seen hell. Is that true?' His
face lit up and was transformed in a way that for me was most convincing."
"This friend who has often visited Sister Lucy, I asked, is that you?" He laughed
and then explained: "Father Martins does not say so. He is very discreet ...
unlike Father Fuentes who was reprehended for his indiscretions." 8 Father
Kondor insisted that it is for the Church to judge Heaven's messages and not for
the seer herself.
At the end of the interview he leafed through, before me, the pages of the
dossier of the process of beatification of Francisco and Jacinta Marto, the
original of which is kept in Rome. Father Kondor told me "The definitive work of
Father Alonso on Fatima, cannot be published because he had drafted it before
the process was completed. There was lacking in the work of Father Alonso
certain documents which are found in this dossier."9
Without being precise, Father Kondor gave the impression that it was Rome's
will that we regard the consecration as done and desist from further
questioning.
www.fatima.org
Cardinal Ratzinger is
identified by Father
Kondor as the only one
who can grant
permission to speak to
Sister Lucy.
she is incapable of replying. "When did Sister Lucy say, for the first time, that
the Consecration of 1984 had satisfied the requirements of Heaven?" There
again she was not able to reply. What troubling and suspicious elements there
are in this affair! And the good Carmelite, who was already too painfully
conscious of all this mysteriousness when I asked her "Why have they waited
five years before announcing that the Consecration of Russia had been
effected?" she concluded our interview in making to me this avowal, "I think like
you do but the Church is like that. We must pray." I asked her once more to
know if the Mother Prioress would give me the same responses to my questions.
She replied, "Yes."
Lucia, March 1990, p. 192) Whence my question: Between February and August
'89 that is at the end of August '89 when the seer is reputed to have written
the letter to Maria de Belem did Sister Lucy receive permission from the Holy
See to enter into correspondence over the questions concerning the apparitions
and the message of Fatima?
Father Cristino wished to change the subject and talk about England: the new
appointment to Canterbury, Cardinal Newman's canonization cause. The
conversation was very cordial and warm.
The interview being completed, we got up and when I had left his office, he took
me by the arm to acknowledge to me that he shared our uneasiness. "I
understand your objections," he told me, "That troubles me ... It is strange that
they have let five years elapse before saying that the Consecration was
accomplished."
Maria Do Fetal
I had hoped to see Sister Lucy's niece, Maria do Fetal, whilst I was in Fatima,
but to no avail.10I called at her apartment several times during the day and
evening too, but she never answered her interphone. I left a note under her
door, but without result. Yet she was in Fatima because my host had seen her in
the bank. He kindly rang one of his friends and was told that Maria do Fetal
would make no further declarations. She has even had her telephone
disconnected. Presumably, she is shocked at having seen her photograph in
Father Gruner's publication illustrating the articles entitled "Father Fox's
Fabrications", "The Inventions of Maria do Fetal".11
FOOTNOTES:
1.
This is an American youth pilgrimage organized by Father Fox. This American priest,
whose Fatima Family Messenger has yet to reach a circulation of 15,000 (cf. Voz da
Fatima, 13 August 1990, no.815) would have remained a great unknown in the United
States had he not been commissioned to obstruct the work of Father Gruner who
"importunes the Holy Father" with his petitions for the Consecration of Russia to the
Immaculate Heart of Mary.
2.
Remember that, contrary to what Father Fox says, neither Apostolic Nuncio
Archbishop Portaluppi, who died on 31 March 1984, nor his successor, Archbishop
Salvatore Asti, spoke with Sister Lucy after the official act of offering the world made
on 25 March 1984. (cf CRC 228 Apr. 90. Eng. ed) We know that all the steps taken by
a French priest and devotee of Fatima to get the Nuncio to question Sister Lucy ended
in failure. In October 1985, this same French priest suggested to Archbishop Salvatore
Asti that he visit Sister Lucy in her Carmel at Coimbra to ask her about Heaven's will.
The answer he received was Holy Church has plenty of time ahead of her. She has
the promise of eternal life. Let's be patient. Everything will come in due time. (Personal
correspondence dated 4 November 1985). Again, this same priest was in Rome during
the second half of November 1985 and had occasion to see Cardinal Oddi. This is
www.fatima.org
what he relates: "When I said to Cardinal Oddi that the Nuncio in Lisbon should return
(as in 1983) to see Sister Lucy, he answered: 'Whatever you do, don't mention that in
the Vatican. They would immediately telephone the Nuncio to stop him from going to
see Lucy' [...]. The telephone call to the Nuncio [ordering him to question the seer] is
dependent on the Pope and on the Secretary of State, who are in no way prepared to
give such an order." (personal correspondence dated 22 Nov. 85).
3.
As far as we know, before January 1990 Father Kondor had never stated that Sister
Lucy regarded the 'Consecration of 1984 as sufficient to fulfill Our Lady's request for
the consecration of Russia'.
4.
5.
Father Kondor is reduced to giving a desperate explanation. We would point
out that those who are in any way informed about the Fatima message and
who knew the official text of offering the world, (even before 25 March
1984), from which the word "Russia" was omitted, were perfectly aware
that neither the Pope nor the bishops would be fulfilling Our Lady's request
on that day.
Bishop do Amaral was among the informed who in February 1984 had yet
to receive the order from Rome that the March '84 consecration be
presented as conforming with Heaven's will since "the Pope was doing all
that it was possible for him to do." On 14 February 1984, Bishop do Amaral
confided to Brother Michael, in the course of a twenty minute conversation:
"The Pope will make a further consecration on 25 March. It will be another
step forward ..." Brother Michael noted that the Bishop of Leiria-Fatima said
nothing about the Pope finally responding to Our Lady's request.
Again, Sister Lucy, who on 22 March '84 had already read John Paul II's
letter to the world's bishops together with the text of the official offering,
told her old friend Madam Maria Eugenia Pestana de Vasconcelos Costa:
"This act of consecration cannot be decisive because Russia does not
appear in it as the sole object of the consecration." (cf CRC 226. Feb.90.
Eng. ed)
And then, our French priest returned to Portugal at the beginning of March
1984 to encourage his friends Dr. Lacerda and Father Messias Dias Coelho
to urge the Apostolic Nuncio to visit Sister Lucy shortly after 25 March so
that Heaven's messenger might explain to the Holy See's representative
(as had been done at the Parlor of 19 March 1983 after the act of offering
the world made on 13 May '82) why Heaven's will remained unsatisfied.
Unfortunately, there was no time for this excellent plan to be put into action
since the Apostolic Nuncio, Archbishop Portaluppi, a great devotee of Our
www.fatima.org
Lady of Fatima, took to his bed in the evening of 25 March and died six
days later.
6.
This word processor, or computer, was given to the Carmelite community by Father
Kondor himself, who told this to our Brother Augustine of the Holy Saviour on 22
February 1990. Father Fox did not omit to tell his readers that the Coimbra Carmel
possessed a computer (cf. Fatima Family Messenger Jan-March 90 p.10).
7.
8.
We recall that Father Kondor succeeded Father Fuentes in 1961 after Father
Fuentes had been relieved of his office as postulator for revealing to the
press declarations by Sister Lucy in which she gave the main lines of Our
Lady's message announcing the grave crisis about to confront the Church
(cf. Brother Michael The Whole Truth About Fatima, Vol. III p.503-510). It
is notable that Father Kondor speaks of Father Fuentes' 'indiscretions' and
not of 'fabrications', indicating that he recognizes the authenticity of Sister
Lucy's words as reported by Father Fuentes. When Father Fuentes was
dismissed, a note was issued by the Coimbra diocesan curia to say that the
Postulator of the beatification cause of the Fatima seers Francisco and
Jacinta had invented words which he attributed to Sister Lucy. Let's quote a
few extracts from this note:
"The Rev. Father Augustine Fuentes, postulator of the beatification cause of
the Fatima seers, Francisco and Jacinta, visited Sister Lucy in her Carmel at
Coimbra and spoke with her exclusively of matters concerning the
beatification process. But, on his return to Mexico, his country of origin,
this priest made sensational declarations of an apocalyptic, eschatological
and prophetic nature, which he claimed to have heard from Sister Lucy
herself [...] This is what was reported in A Voz of 22 June last and again on
1 July in a translation made by M.C. de Braganca. In order to calm all those
who had read the articles in A Voz and who had been left alarmed by
reports of cataclysms which, according to the documentation, will befall the
world in 1960, and above all to put an end to the tendentious campaign of
"prophecies", whereby the authors, without realizing it, heap ridicule on
themselves and on those things relating to Sister Lucy, the Coimbra
diocesan curia is publishing Sister Lucy's words in answer to questions put
to her by one in authority: "Father Fuentes spoke with me in his capacity as
postulator of the beatification cause of the Servants of God, Jacinta and
Francisco Marto. We spoke only of things to do with this subject. As for the
rest, to which we refer, it is neither exact nor true. This I deplore, for I do
not understand how any good can be done for souls with things that are
www.fatima.org
not based on God who is Truth. I know nothing and consequently could say
nothing about chastisements falsely attributed to me." (Ibid. p.549-550)
In the declaration of 2 July 1959, therefore, the Coimbra episcopal curia
publicly accused Father Fuentes of having lied. Father Alonso's
rehabilitation of Father Fuentes led Brother Michael to the following
conclusion concerning this declaration: "Everything is explained if a Roman
authority demanded the Bishop of Coimbra to make a formal and
immediate denial. It is a sad business in which doubtless neither Sister
Lucy nor Father Fuentes lied. And if the Coimbra curia lied, it was doubtless
through obedience to a higher command." (Ibid. p. 553)
We shall remember that ecclesiastics have already lied in the history of
Fatima. In this case, it was members of the Coimbra episcopal curia who
lied shamelessly to the point of issuing a supposed denial on the part of
Sister Lucy, forged from nothing on the order of Roman Authority.
9.
This was the only argument advanced by Father Kondor to justify the decision taken
by Bishop do Amaral to not at all publish the work of Father Alonso. The Bishop of
Leiria-Fatima obtained the endorsement of a Commission of Portuguese University
Professors for this decision. Father Joaquin Maria Alonso, a Spanish Claretan and a
Council peritus, had been officially commissioned by the Bishop of Leiria, Msgr.
Venancio, in 1966, to establish a complete critical history of the apparitions and
message of Fatima. After ten years' work, he had collected, classified and commented
on 5,396 documents. It was an irreplaceable work, whose particular merit was to
demonstrate the falseness of the modernist theories developed by Father Dhanis
against Fatima. According to Laurentin, who had consulted the work, the manuscripts
of "Fatima, texts and critical studies" were "very well prepared."- (cf Le Secret de
Fatima Historia May 1982. p.48). This scientific work was ready for publication in 1974
(cf. Father Cristino, "La documentation critique de Fatima": Voz de Fatima, January
89) and in November 1976 Fr. Kondor issued the following statement: "The work
'Fatima, texts and critical studies', which has been announced for some time, will at
last begin to appear. The first volume, in Portuguese, will appear shortly." (The Seers
of Fatima, 1976 no. 6) But then nothing came. It is permissible to think that if the
Fatima Sanctuary did not publish the work after all, it was especially to avoid lending
credit to Fr. Alonso's thesis on the Third Secret. The official historian of Fatima had in
fact devoted one of the fourteen volumes of "Fatima, texts and critical studies" to
demonstrating that the Third Secret announces "the crisis of faith in the Church" and
"deficiencies among the Church's leading hierarchy". In the third volume of his The
Whole Truth About Fatima, Brother Michael resumed and developed this thesis of
Father Alonso. To the best of our knowledge, only Father Geraldes Freire and Father
Antonio Maria Martins continue to hold a different hypothesis. Father Martins
addressed Brother Michael a critique of his third volume, but was confounded by our
brother's magisterial reply. (cf "The Third Secret of Fatima" CRC No. 190 May 1986.
Eng. ed.)
10. In December 1989, Father Fox launched his disinformation campaign relying
www.fatima.org
essentially on accounts of supposed parlor meetings between Sister Lucy and Maria
do Fetal. (cf. CRC 224 Dec. 89 p. 22 Eng. ed.)
11. Father Gruner published the English translation of this article, which appeared in
the CRC between January and May 1990, in his publication The Fatima Crusader. In a
booklet soon to be published entitled The Fatal Fox Consecration Hoax more of the
same material will be published by The Fatima Crusader.
Editor's Note: Due to lack of space two introductory paragraphs and one
concluding paragraph were deleted.
www.fatima.org