Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.
90 / Wednesday, May 11, 2005 / Notices
EPA is also, providing an opportunity
for interested parties to provide risk
management proposals or otherwise
comment on risk management.
EPA seeks to achieve environmental
justice, the fair treatment and
meaningful involvement of all people,
regardless of race, color, national origin,
or income, in the development,
implementation, and enforcement of
environmental laws, regulations, and
policies. To help address potential
environmental justice issues, the
Agency seeks information on any groups
or segments of the population who, as
a result of their location, cultural
practices, or other factors, may have
atypical, unusually high exposure to
thidiazuron, compared to the general
population.
EPA is applying the principles of
public participation to all pesticides
undergoing reregistration and tolerance
reassessment. The Agency’s Pesticide
Tolerance Reassessment and
Reregistration; Public Participation
Process, published in the Federal
Register on May 14, 2004, (69 FR
26819)(FRL–7357–9) explains that in
conducting these programs, the Agency
is tailoring its public participation
process to be commensurate with the
level of risk, extent of use, complexity
of the issues, and degree of public
concern associated with each pesticide.
For thidiazuron, a modified, 4-Phase
process with one comment period and
ample opportunity for public
consultation seems appropriate in view
of its overall risk, limited use, use
pattern, limited issues, and the few
affected stakeholders. However, if as a
result of comments received during this
comment period EPA finds that
additional issues warranting further
discussion are raised, the Agency may
lengthen the process and include a
second comment period, as needed.
All comments should be submitted
using the methods in Unit I. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, and must
be received by EPA on or before the
closing date. Comments will become
part of the Agency Docket for
thidiazuron. Comments received after
the close of the comment period will be
marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to
consider these late comments.
B. What is the Agency’s Authority for
Taking this Action?
Section 4(g)(2) of FIFRA as amended
directs that, after submission of all data
concerning a pesticide active ingredient,
‘‘the Administrator shall determine
whether pesticides containing such
active ingredient are eligible for
reregistration,’’ before calling in product
specific data on individual end-use
VerDate jul<14>2003 16:48 May 10, 2005 Jkt 205001
24787
products and either reregistering
products or taking other ‘‘appropriate
regulatory action.’’
Section 408(q) of the FFDCA, 21
U.S.C. 346a(q), requires EPA to review
tolerances and exemptions for pesticide
residues in effect as of August 2, 1996,
to determine whether the tolerance or
exemption meets the requirements of
section 408(b)(2) or (c)(2) of FFDCA.
This review is to be completed by
August 3, 2006.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Pesticides
and pests.
Dated: May 2, 2005.
Peter Caulkins,
Director, Special Review and Reregistration
Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 05–9398 Filed 5–10–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Notice of Public Information
Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the
Federal Communications Commission,
Comments Requested
May 4, 2005.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications
Commission, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork burden
invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection(s), as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995, Public Law 104–13.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act that does not
display a valid control number.
Comments are requested concerning (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) comments should be
submitted on or before July 11, 2005. If
PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11MYN1.SGM
you anticipate that you will be
submitting comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the contact listed below as soon
as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) comments to
Judith B. Herman, Federal
Communications Commission, Room 1–
C804, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington,
DC 20554 or via the Internet to Judith-
B.Herman@fcc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information or copies of the
information collection(s), contact Judith
B. Herman at (202) 418–0214 or via the
Internet at Judith-B.Herman@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control No.: 3060–1070.
Title: Allocation and Service Rules for
the 71–76, 81–86, and 92–95 GHz
Bands, WT Docket No. 02–146, FCC 05–
45, Memorandum Opinion and Order.
Form No.: N/A.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for-
profit, not-for-profit institutions, and
State, local or tribal government.
Number of Respondents: 1,000.
Estimated Time per Response: 1.5–3.5
hours.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirements, recordkeeping
requirement and third party disclosure
requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 12,000 hours.
Total Annual Cost: $1,830,000.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A.
Needs and Uses: In the Memorandum
Opinion and Order, the Commission
addressed a Petition for Reconsideration
filed by the Wireless Communications
Association International, Inc. (WCA)
on February 23, 2004. WCA sought
reconsideration of the Commission’s
Report and Order, adopted on October
16, 2003, and released on November 4,
2003, 69 FR 3257, January 23, 2004,
which adopted service rules to promote
the private sector development and use
of the spectrum in the 71–76 GHz, 81–
86 GHz, and 92–95 GHz bands. The
petition and the instant Memorandum
Opinion and Order focus exclusively on
the licensed use of the 71–76 GHz and
81–86 bands. In the Memorandum
Opinion and Order, the Commission
granted WCA’s request that we adopt an
interference analysis requirement.
Because licensees are now required to
submit an interference analysis to a
third party database manager prior to
link registration, we are modifying the
currently approved collection to
accommodate this new rule
requirement. The interference will
11MYN1
 24788 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 11, 2005 / Notices
facilitate entry and development of the
70–80–90 GHz service by lowering the
risk of interference and thereby ensuring
continued investment.
OMB Control No.: 3060–1081.
Title: Federal-State Joint Board on
Universal Service (ETC Designation), CC
Docket No. 96–45.
Form No.: N/A.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for-
profit.
Number of Respondents: 22.
Estimated Time per Response: .25–3
hours.
Frequency of Response: Annual
reporting requirements and
recordkeeping requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 242 hours.
Total Annual Cost: N/A.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A.
Needs and Uses: In the ETC
Designation Framework Order (FCC 05–
46), the Commission adopted additional
annual reporting requirements and a
recordkeeping requirement for Eligible
Telecommunications Carriers (ETCs).
ETCs will be required to report: (1)
Progress towards meeting its five year
service quality improvement plan; (2)
information on outages lasting more
than 30 minutes; (3) the number of
consumer complaints per 1,000
handsets; (4) information detailing the
number of unfulfilled requests for
service from potential customers for a
twelve month period; (5) certify
compliance with service quality
standards; (6) certify the ability to
function in emergency situations; (7)
certify local usage plan is comparable to
ILEC’s; and (8) certify ETC
acknowledges it may be required to
provide equal access. This information
collection is necessary to ensure that
each ETC satisfies its obligation under
section 214(e) of the Communications
Act of 1934, as amended, to provide
services supported by the universal
service mechanism throughout the areas
for which each ETC is designated.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–9406 Filed 5–10–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
VerDate jul<14>2003 16:48 May 10, 2005 Jkt 205001
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Notice of Public Information
Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the
Federal Communications Commission
for Extension Under Delegated
Authority
May 4, 2005.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications
Commission, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork burden
invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection(s), as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that
does not display a valid control number.
Comments are requested concerning (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
DATES: Persons wishing to comment on
this information collection should
submit comments July 11, 2005. If you
anticipate that you will be submitting
comments, but find it difficult to do so
within the period of time allowed by
this notice, you should advise the
contact listed below as soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) comments to
Judith B. Herman, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th
Street, SW., Room 1–C804, Washington,
DC 20554 or via the Internet to Judith-
B.Herman@fcc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information or copies of the
information collections contact Judith B.
Herman at (202) 418–0214 or via the
Internet at Judith-B.Herman@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control No.: 3060–0713.
Title: Alternative Broadcast
Inspection Program (ABIP) Compliance
Notification.
Form No.: N/A.
PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11MYN1.SGM
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for
profit and not-for-profit institutions.
Number of Respondents: 53.
Estimated Time per Response: 5
minutes (.084 hours).
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 220 hours.
Annual Cost Burden: N/A.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A.
Needs and Uses: The ABIP is an
agreement between the Federal
Communications Commission’s
Enforcement Bureau and an entity,
usually a state broadcast association, in
which the entity arranges for the
inspection of the broadcast station to
determine compliance with FCC
regulations. The inspections are
conducted on a voluntary basis and the
entities notify the local FCC District
Office or Resident Agent office, in
writing via letter of those stations that
pass the ABIP inspection and have been
granted a Certificate of Compliance. The
FCC’s Enforcement Bureau standardized
the existing Alternative Broadcast
Inspection Program (ABIP) in 2003 to
establish a specific, uniform
arrangement for the inspection of
broadcast stations. This information will
be used by FCC to determine which
broadcast stations comply with FCC
Rules and will not be subject to routine
inspections conducted by the FCC’s
District Offices. Without this
information, the FCC would not be able
to determine which stations should be
exempt from random inspections.
OMB Control No.: 3060–0989.
Title: Procedures for Applicants
Requiring Section 214 Authorizations
for Domestic Interstate Transmission
Lines Acquired through Corporate
Control, 47 CFR Sections 63.01, 63.03
and 63.04.
Form No.: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for
profit.
Number of Respondents: 86.
Estimated Time per Response: 1.5–12
hours.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 958 hours.
Annual Cost Burden: $70,000.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A.
Needs and Uses: Procedures for this
information collection are set forth for
common carriers requiring authorization
under section 214 of the
Communications Act (Act) of 1934, as
amended to acquire domestic interstate
transmission lines through a transfer of
control. Under section 214 of the Act,
11MYN1