Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 1

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

49 / Tuesday, March 15, 2005 / Notices 12727

for self-abuse. On multiple occasions, Cause also notified Dr. Sprague that California. As a result, it is reasonable
Respondent gained access to patients’ should no request for a hearing be filed to infer that she is also without
homes in order to accomplish the thefts, within 30 days, her hearing right would authorization to handle controlled
a particularly heinous modus operandi be deemed waived. substances in that State.
for a trusted family physician. The Order to Show Cause was sent by DEA does not have statutory authority
Respondent also failed to maintain certified mail to Dr. Sprague at her under the Controlled substances Act to
adequate records of controlled registered address in La Jolla, California. issue or maintain a registration if the
substances as required by DEA However that letter was unclaimed. It applicant or registrant is without State
regulations and finally, was convicted was then forwarded by the United States authority to handle controlled
pursuant to his plea agreement of a State Postal Service to 7934 La Jolla Shores substances in the State in which she
misdemeanor involving controlled Drive, La Jolla, California 92037, an conducts business. See 21 U.S.C.
substances. address Dr. Sprague had provided postal 802(21), 823(f) and 824(a)(3). This
While the investigative file reflects authorities as a forwarding address. She prerequisite has been consistently
Respondent sought treatment for his had also previously advised DEA upheld. See Richard J. Clement, M.D.,
addiction, albeit while criminal charges investigators to use that address when 68 FR 12103 (2003); Dominick A. Ricci,
were pending, and he has undergone sending correspondence related to her M.D., 58 FR 51104 (1993); Bobby Watts,
successful follow-up random drug registration. However, the forwarded M.D., 53 FR 11919 (1988).
testing, the egregious nature of his letter was also unclaimed and postal Here, it is clear that Dr. Sprague’s
misconduct bears directly upon his authorities returned it to DEA stamped State medical license was suspended
fitness to posses a DEA registration. In ‘‘Notice Left—No Response.’’ Additional and there is no information before the
sum, applying factors two through five efforts by DEA investigators to locate Dr. Deputy Administrator which points to
above, Respondent’s abandonment of Sprague’s current address were also that suspension having been lifted or
his patients’ medical interests and unsuccessful. DEA has not received a stayed. As a result, Dr. Sprague is not
flaunting of their personal trust to divert request for hearing or any other reply authorized to practice medicine or
controlled substances to his personal from Dr. Sprague or anyone purporting handle controlled substances in
use, coupled with his flagrant violations to represent her in this matter. California, where she is registered with
of law and regulation, all lead to the Therefore, the Deputy Administrator DEA. Therefore, she is not entitled to
inevitable conclusion that granting this of DEA, finding that: (1) Thirty days maintain that registration.
application would be inconsistent with having passed since the attempted Accordingly, the Deputy
the public interest. deliveries of the order to Show Cause to Administrator of the Drug Enforcement
Accordingly, the Deputy the Registrant’s address of record and Administration, pursuant to the
Administrator of the Drug Enforcement her forwarding address; (2) reasonable authority vested in her by 21 U.S.C. 823
Administration, pursuant to the and good faith efforts to locate her have and 824 and 28 CFR 0.100(b) and 0.104,
authority vested in her by 21 U.S.C. 823 been unsuccessful; and (3) no request hereby orders that DEA Certificate of
and 28 CFR 0.100(b) and 0.104, hereby for hearing having been received, Registration, BS1464089, issued to
orders that the application of Glenn concludes that Dr. Sprague is deemed to Margaret Melinda Sprague, M.D., be,
Anthony Routhouska, D.O., for a DEA have waived her hearing right. See and it hereby is, revoked. The Deputy
Certificate of Registration, be, and it James E. Thomas, M.D., 70 FR 3564 Administrator further orders that any
hereby is denied. This order is effective (2005); Steven A. Barnes, M.D., 69 FR pending applications for renewal or
April 14, 2005. 51474 (2004); David W. Linder, 67 FR modification of the aforementioned
12579 (2002). After considering material registration be, and hereby are, denied.
Dated: February 14, 2005.
from the investigative file in this matter, This order is effective April 14, 2005.
Michele M. Leonhart, the Deputy Administrator now enters
Deputy Administrator. Dated: February 14, 2005.
her final order without a hearing
[FR Doc. 05–5071 Filed 3–14–05; 8:45 am] pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.43(d) and (e) Michele M. Leonhart,
BILLING CODE 4410–09–M and 1301.46. Deputy Administrator.
The Deputy Administrator finds that [FR Doc. 05–5073 Filed 3–14–05; 8:45 am]
Dr. Sprague is currently registered with BILLING CODE 4410–09–M
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DEA as a practitioner authorized to
handle controlled substances in
Drug Enforcement Administration Schedules II through V under Certificate DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Margaret Melinda Sprague, M.D.; of Registration BS1464089, expiring on
February 28, 2006. According to Drug Enforcement Administration
Revocation of Registration
information in the investigative file on Titan Wholesale, Inc.; Denial of
On September 8, 2004, the Deputy December 3, 2003, the Medical Board of Registration
Assistant Administrator, Office of California (Board) issued an Order
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement immediately suspending Dr. Sprague’s On October 13, 2004, the Deputy
Administration (DEA), issued an Order Physician and Surgeon’s Certificate. The Assistant Administrator, Office of
to Show Cause to Margaret Melinda suspension was based in part, on the Division Control, Drug Enforcement
Sprague, M.D. (Dr. Sprague) who was Board’s conclusion that Dr. Sprague was Administration (DEA), issued an Order
notified of an opportunity to show cause unable to safely practice medicine due to Show Cause to Titan Wholesale, Inc.
as to why DEA should not revoke her to a mental or physical condition. (Titan) proposing to deny its August 14,
DEA Certificate of Registration There is no evidence before the 2003, application for DEA Certificate of
BS1464089, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. Deputy Administrator to rebut a finding Registration as a distributor of list I
824(a)(3) and deny any pending that Dr. Sprague’s California medical chemicals. The Order to Show Cause
applications under 21 U.S.C. 823(f), on license has been suspended. Therefore, alleged that granting Titan’s application
the ground that she lacks State authority The Deputy Administrator finds Dr. would be inconsistent with the public
to handle controlled substances in the Sprague is currently not authorized to interest, as that term is used in 21 U.S.C.
State of California. The Order to Show practice medicine in the State of 823(h). The order also notified Titan

VerDate jul<14>2003 15:31 Mar 14, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM 15MRN1

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi