Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1.0
Introduction
1.1
Overview
This action plan begins with an introduction of my background as a teacher
1.2
Lintang Campus two months after completing my B. Ed. TESOL. Three years and
eight months down the road, the teaching experiences I have include working with
primary school students, pre-service trainees and in-service teachers through
workshops, short proficiency courses, courses for the foundation programmes as
well as methodology courses for the degree programme. A bulk of my work is related
to
teaching
English
language
courses
in
pre-service
programmes
1.3
practicum. The trainees that I have previously mentored come from a range of
courses from Kursus Perguruan Lepasan Ijazah (KPLI) to Program Ijazah Sarjana
Muda Perguruan (PISMP) to the B. Ed (TESOL) twinning programme between IPG
Kampus Batu Lintang and University of Otago. ..
2.0
Issue Identification
2.1
between one activity in a lesson to another and to the lesson objective. The activities
they carry out may contain the element of fun but there is little indication of how the
activities
contribute
to
the
overall
objective
of
the
lesson. .
2.2
that most lesson plans available online, which many teachers depend on, contain
very detailed descriptions of activities. They are filled with activities that identify what
the pupils will do, not what and how they will learn. In an experiment carried out by
Beers (2006), it was found that in many cases of lesson planning, there was no clear
connection between what pupils needed to be able to do
2.3
teaching but unless they learn how to link theory to practice effectively, the theories
remain as philosophical ideas. More importantly, working on trainees practical skills
will create a positive snowball effect ..
PART B
3.0
Action Plan
3.1
(i)
(ii)
3.3
In order to achieve the aim of enabling my trainees to create a link between all
the learning activities in a lesson to each other as well as to the lesson objectives,
and to make these links obvious and explicit to the pupils, I will use the modelling
strategy, with a focus on the think aloud protocol (TAP).
3.3.2 Justification of strategies
Teachers teach as they were taught; hence, the terms training and
modelling can be used synonymously in certain contexts. I cannot tell my trainees
to do what I am not doing myself. As stated by Loughran (2006), it is crucial that
teacher educators are continually reminded of the need to confront the tyranny of
teaching as telling. .
In this case, modelling the process of lesson planning to my trainees would
give them access to the underlying purpose of lesson planning .
3.4
I will use the think aloud protocol in order to model the steps I go through in planning
my lessons and drawing links within the lesson to the lesson objectives.
When teacher trainees are asked to write lesson plans, they have to include a
rationale for every activity. .
My second step would be to model making links in my lessons explicit to my
students. However, I often do not teach the trainees that I supervise on practicum.
Hence, I would conduct a micro-teaching lesson to demonstrate how to make links
explicit to the pupils.
In the micro-teaching lesson, I would focus on the transition between each
learning activity in the lesson. At the beginning of each activity,
3.5
because modelling can work even when the practice being modelled does not reflect
perfection..
3.6
change in their practice as well as the time frame which different trainees will require
to make a positive change. ..
PART C
4.0
Reflection
The experience of developing my plan created the need for me to rethink the
References
Beers, B. (2006). Learning-Driven Schools: A practical guide for teachers and
principals. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum
Development.
Butt, G. (2008). Lesson Planning (3rd ed.). London: Continuum.