Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1. Test name
2. Main subjects & wide applying subjects
3. Purpose
4. Standardization
5. Reliability
6. Validity
7. Require training
8. Test Time
9. Contents
10. Method
11. Recoding
12. Interpretation.
1.
Test name
2.
3.
Activity
Motor
Performance Measure
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to investigate which reach distance was more
highly correlated with Balance.
1) to document change over time in patients with balance problems,
2) to assess likelihood that patient will fall ,
3) to complete a balance assessment.
4.
Standardization
Results in the literature have been reported in inches and centimeters. The
functional reach score equals the difference (in inches or centimeters)
between the end and the start hand positions. (2.54 cm = 1 inch)
5.
Test Time
This test takes a few minutes and is very reliable
Subject must be able to stand 5 Minutes or Less without support in order to
have this test administered
6.
Method
The Functional Reach Test: Standing instructions (Weiner, D. K., Duncan, P. W., et al.
(1992). "Functional reach: a marker of physical frailty." J Am Geriatr Soc 40(3): 203207.)
The patient is instructed to stands close to, but not touching, a wall and position the
arm that is closer to the wall at 90 degrees of shoulder flexion with a closed fist and
without rotation
The assessor records the starting position at the 3rd metacarpal head on the
yardstick
Instruct the patient to Reach as far as you can forward without taking a step
The location of the 3rd metacarpal is recorded
7.
Reliability
Parkinsons Disease:
(Schenkman et al, 1997, Parkinsons Disease)
Stroke:
(Outermans et al, 2010, Subacute Stroke)
Vestibular Disorders:
(Mann et al, 1996; 2 physical therapists, 10 undiagnosed volunteers, Vestibular
Disorder)
8.
Validity
iADL (r = 0.66)
Parkinsons Disease
(Jenkens et al. 2010, Parkinsons Disease)
(Behrman, A.L. et al, 2002; n = 58; mean age = 64.3 (9.3) years, Parkinsons
Disease)
A functional reach criterion of less than 25.4 cm for risk of falls identified only
30% of the individuals with PD known to be at risk from their history of falls
An increase in the reach criterion to 30.1 cm for falls risk nearly doubled the
test sensitivity of the FRT, although 44% of the persons at risk remained
unidentified by the FRT
9.
Contents
Yardstick and/or large paper, tape. Mackenzie(1999)
Suggests a modified form of the measuring device using a self-recording tape
measure connected to a handle.
10.
Recoding
Terms
Definitions
11.
Require training
12.
Interpretation
No Training
Daubney and Culham (1999) found that ankle plantar-flexion force accounted for
13% of the score on the FR. Correlations were found between FR and hip extensor
strength and hip flexor strength. Eight hundred thirty three community dwelling
elderly 64-79 years old (457 were Mexican American) participated in a home
assessment. For each degree increase in shoulder ROM,
the likelihood of having a short reach was reduced by 3% and for each degree
increase in elbow ROM, the likelihood of having a short reach was reduced by 2%.