Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
https://www.scribd.com/doc/216414185/Taxation-of-Works-ContractsUnder-TN-VAT-Act-4th-Revision-Made-on-01-04-2014
https://www.scribd.com/doc/216776679/TDS-Under-TNVAT-RulesRevision-Made-01-04-2014
Tax disputes between the dealer and the department, is discussed herein in
detail, for the purpose of understanding in the hands of the person who
intend to react on the erroneous and/or wrong assessment orders passed by
the assessing authority.
And again, even if the assessment orders passed by the assessing authority
do not fall under the above erroneous assessment category, it does not
meant that there is no disputes between the dealer and the assessing
authority. The second reason for disputes arises owing to technical or venial
breach of the provisions of the act or where the breach flows from a bona
fide belief in the hands of the dealer as well as in the hands of the assessing
authority.
Conditions:
In case of appeal under section 51(1) the conditional payment of a sum
equal to 25% of disputed tax liability plus 100% of accepted tax liability
need to be deposited and evidence for the same be attached along with the
application for appeal.
On the other hand, it does not mean that the dealer need not go for appeal
as the assessing authority has no rights and privileges to initiate recovery
proceedings. If the dealer fails to go for an appeal, quoting the above reason,
the assessing authority can issue a notice for rectification of assessment
under section 84 on his own and pass fresh orders along with necessary
forms in Form O and/or Form RR. Hence it is advisable to the dealer to go
for an appeal with appellate authority or revision, in the absence of
statutory appeal provisions, even if the assessing authority fails to issue
Form O and/or Form RR along with the assessment orders, if the orders
were not acceptable to the dealer(s).
For any further clarifications the reader may reach the author:
P.Jagadeeswaran,
VAT Practitioner,