Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
INTERNATION
AL ECONOMIC
POLICY
PRACTICAL ACTIVITY #1
Exercice 1
A: Alfredo Fierro makes a parallelism between the ancient societies which
overuse theodicy to question the existence of God or even its intervention
into the natural disasters and catastrophes with the current malformed and
obscene societies which rejects for its incrimination in the unequal, unfair
and discriminator development of the world.
Alfredo exalts Ivan Karamazovs figure in the sense of rising up against ideal
and utopian paradises. We have to refuse Leibnizs thought and his idea of
this world is the best of all the possible worlds. Its time to impose acts,
set changes and get results from economic policies utility.
B: I hardly believe that Alfredo Fierro get a relationship between God and
Economic Policy. Let me explain it. God was for ancient societies a way of
justifying what was happening in the real world in that period. People turn to
Gods decision when something didnt go as well as they thought. Instead
of using their faith in achieving better goals they followed other objectives,
for sure, the God they dignify should be disappointed with.
The link that I see between God and Economic Policy is that today
economist look at them (Economic Policies) in the same way as previous
societies look at him (God). Policy makers should not fall back into the same
error. Economic Policies should not be considered tools to blame in.
Economic Policies were made to change rules and not to justify imbalanced
worlds running. So, by the way, lets use it and leave the belief that God
by himself will change it.
Exercice 2
Janes view is based on a polytomous economic policy structure. It means
that theres not a lonely way of understanding and structuring the
instruments and objectives of economic policies. In addition, this structure
presents three types of economic policies:
Constitutional Policies: those aimed at maintaining economic order and
functioning rules.
Purely Economic Goals Policies: these ones are subordinated to the
constitutional policies and are made to run basic economic goals (growth,
price stability, full employment)
Specific Economic Goals: are subordinated to the others and looks for some
specific and temporal goals.
On the other hand, Buchanans view distinguishes between constitution
which determine the policy process and policymakers decisions that are set
inside its constitution. That is, the results obtained through any particular
economic policy (policy act) are settled by the rules that are laid down in the
constitution. It means that constitution is the set of rules which govern the
process of making of policies.
So, at this point, as there is not any degree of freedom normative analysis is
useless.
Exercise 3
Is well known that political processes have had an important weight into the
economic policy roles. Politicians set a kind of contract with citizens where
the contract is a promise of a policy (program) in return for votes (or
contributions). Although the intention of the contracts is such to force
politicians to serve the general interests, nothing can guarantee this.
Political institutions and organizations could be considered governance
structures. These are characterized by various agency relationships. From
an economic approach, citizens or voters are considered the principals and
the politicians or parties the agents. Agencies are created as parts of the
legislative or the executive branches of government and are formally
responsible to the Congress or the president. Nevertheless, each branch
wields some power over the others agents, and other are influenced by
powerful minorities such us courts, lobbies or the media. Therefore, some
politicians are considered to have a double agent side or facet.
The purpose of these influences is about economic interests: perhaps
politicians with specific assets in locations or industries, pivotal supporters
with economic investments in those set of firms, political hold-up from these
interest groups.
a) [(1 Car SEAT Ibiza 1600 x 15.000 ) + (10 Tn. Of coal of gasoil for
heating x 700 /Tn) + (100 Kg. of oranges x 0,5 /Kg) + (6 haircuts x
15 /haircut) + (4 Bic pens x 0,25 /pen)] / [(1 Car SEAT Ibiza 1600 x
10.000 ) + (10 Tn. Of coal of gasoil for heating x 300 /Tn) + (100
Kg. of oranges x 1 /Kg) + (6 haircuts x 4 /haircut) + (4 Bic pens x
0,2 /pen)] = (22.141 / 13.124,8 ) x 100 = Today, average
prices are 68,7 % higher than in 1984.
b) [(1 Car SEAT Ibiza 1600 x 15.000 ) + (10.000 lit. of gasoil for heating
x 0,60 /l) + (100 Kg. of oranges x 0,5 /Kg) + (6 haircuts x 15
/haircut) + (4 Bic pens x 0,25 /pen)] / [(1 Car SEAT Ibiza 1600 x
10.000 ) + (10.000 lit. of gasoil for heating x 0,35 /l) + (100 Kg. of
oranges x 1 /Kg) + (6 haircuts x 4 /haircut) + (4 Bic pens x 0,2
/pen)] = (21.141 / 13.624,8 ) x 100 = Today, average prices
are 55,17 % higher than in 1984.
c) [(1 Car SEAT Ibiza 1600 x 15.000 ) + (10.000 lit. of gasoil for heating
x 0,60 /l) + (100 Kg. of oranges x 0,5 /Kg) + (6 haircuts x 15
/haircut) + (4 Bic pens x 0,25 /pen) + (1 PC x 800 ) / [(1 Car SEAT
Ibiza 1600 x 10.000 ) + (10.000 lit. of gasoil for heating x 0,35 /l) +
(100 Kg. of oranges x 1 /Kg) + (6 haircuts x 4 /haircut) + (4 Bic
pens x 0,2 /pen)] = (21.941 / 13.624,8 ) x 100 = Today,
average prices are 61,04 % higher than in 1984.
1- Not at all. Because the quantities in 1984 and in 2014 were and
are the same. So it wont be any differences using either
Laspeyres Index or Paasche Index. Therefore, we wont get an
accurate result. Itll get either underestimate or
overestimate inflation.
2- Not at all. Were still having the same problem as in a). Moreover,
we are confusing changes in prices in changes in products
qualities. (From coal to oil).
3- We have distorted even more the results because we have
included a product that didnt exist on 1984 yet. In addition, we
have created a bias due to the appearance of new products.
B:
a) Inflation rate = 68,7 %.
Average Monthly Pension per Person in 1984 = 300 EUR.
Pension Total Amount in 2014 = (300 x 1,687 x 12) X 5.10 =
30.366 Millions of .
b) Inflation rate = 55,17 %
Average Monthly Pension per Person in 1984 = 300 EUR.
Pension Total Amount in 2014 = (300 x 1,5517 x 12) X 5.10 =
28.026 Millions of .