Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 1

3902 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

17 / Thursday, January 27, 2005 / Proposed Rules

discharges in order to schedule for a levels. The potential hazards also highly is not controversial and do not expect
batched discharge. depend on the case-specific incinerator comments that oppose it. We have
In summary, NRC has concluded that design and site-specific exposure to the explained the reasons for this
the public comments, data, analyses, public and the environment. Even authorization in the preamble to the
reports, and petitioner’s rationale do not though the discharge requirements for immediate final rule. Unless we get
justify the petitioner’s request for a 10 CFR 20.2003 were set to adequately written comments which oppose this
rulemaking to amend the regulations in protect public health and safety and the authorization during the comment
10 CFR 20.2003 to require that all environment, different human exposure period, the immediate final rule will
licensees provide no less than 24 hours scenarios apply to the disposal of become effective on the date it
advance notification to the appropriate licensed material by incineration, even establishes, and we will not take further
sewage treatment plant before releasing if those materials are discharged in action on this proposal. If we get
radioactive material into a sanitary compliance with another section of the comments that oppose this action, we
sewer system. Such a rulemaking would regulations. NRC found that the will withdraw the immediate final rule
impose unnecessary regulatory burden acceptability of incineration as a and it will not take effect. We will then
on licensees and does not appear to be disposal option, except for exempted respond to public comments in a later
warranted for the adequate protection of quantities of radioactive materials, must final rule based on this proposal. You
public health and safety and the be determined on a facility- and site- may not have another opportunity for
common defense and security. specific basis. NRC continues to believe comment. If you want to comment on
Therefore, NRC is denying the that prior NRC approval for incineration this action, you must do so at this time.
petitioner’s request to amend 10 CFR is necessary to have reasonable
20.2003. DATES:Send your written comments by
assurance that the public health and February 28, 2005.
With respect to the petitioner’s safety are adequately protected.
request to amend 10 CFR 20.2004, NRC Therefore, NRC is also denying the ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
has reviewed the petitioner’s rationale, petitioner’s request to amend 10 CFR Audrey E. Baker, Authorizations
the public comments on the petition, 20.2004 to explicitly exempt radioactive Coordinator, RCRA Programs Branch,
and the regulatory history on the materials that enter the sanitary waste Waste Management Division, U.S.
requirements for NRC approval for stream under 10 CFR 20.2003 from the Environmental Protection Agency, The
incineration. NRC regulations in 10 CFR requirements regarding NRC approval Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center, 61
20.2004 apply to either an NRC or an for incineration. Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia
Agreement State licensee and generally For the reasons cited in this 30303–8960; (404) 562–8483. You may
do not apply to a POTW or its document, NRC denies this petition. also e-mail comments to
operations. POTWs are not required to baker.audrey@epa.gov. You can
obtain NRC approval for incineration of Dated in Rockville, Maryland, this 21st day
of January, 2005. examine copies of the materials
their sewage sludge, unless they possess submitted by Georgia during normal
an NRC or Agreement State license for For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
business hours at the following
possession of licensed radioactive Annette Vietti-Cook,
locations: EPA Region 4 Library, The
material in the sewage sludge. Studies, Secretary of the Commission. Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center, 61
surveys, and modeling efforts conducted [FR Doc. 05–1485 Filed 1–26–05; 8:45 am] Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia
to date indicate that releases of BILLING CODE 7590–01–U 30303–8960, phone number: (404) 562–
radioactive material from licensed 8190, John Wright, Librarian; or The
facilities in accordance with 10 CFR Georgia Department of Natural
20.2003 generally do not reconstitute in ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Resources Environmental Protection
sewage sludge in sufficient AGENCY Division, 2, Martin Luther King, Jr.,
concentrations to pose a risk to public Drive, Suite 1154 East Tower, Atlanta
health and safety and thus it is unlikely 40 CFR Part 271 Georgia 30334–4910, phone number:
that a POTW will be required to possess (404) 656–7802.
[FRL–7864–5]
an NRC license for its sludge. Therefore,
a change to 10 CFR 20.2004 regulations FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Georgia: Final Authorization of State Audrey E. Baker, Authorizations
is not needed. Hazardous Waste Management
If a licensee incinerates licensed Coordinator, RCRA Programs Branch,
Program Revision Waste Management Division, U.S.
material, the staff continues to believe
that the NRC approval requirements are AGENCY: Environmental Protection Environmental Protection Agency, The
necessary to have reasonable assurance Agency (EPA). Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center, 61
that the public health and safety are ACTION: Proposed rule.
Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia
adequately protected. Hazards 30303–8960; (404) 562–8483.
associated with incinerating licensed SUMMARY: Georgia has applied to EPA SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For
material will highly depend on the for Final authorization of the changes to additional information, please see the
specific characteristic of the matrix its hazardous waste program under the immediate final rule published in the
containing the licensed material. If a Resource Conservation and Recovery ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of this
licensee incinerates the licensed Act (RCRA). EPA proposes to grant final Federal Register.
material contained in the sewage sludge, authorization to Georgia. In the ‘‘Rules
many factors would have to be and Regulations’’ section of this Federal Dated: January 6, 2005.
considered because the sewage sludge Register, EPA is authorizing the changes A. Stanley Meiburg,
could potentially have a broad spectrum by an immediate final rule. EPA did not Deputy Regional Administrator, Region 4.
of radionuclides from various sources make a proposal prior to the immediate [FR Doc. 05–1532 Filed 1–26–05; 8:45 am]
and a wide range of concentration final rule because we believe this action BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

VerDate jul<14>2003 08:39 Jan 26, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\27JAP1.SGM 27JAP1

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi