Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Brains with extraordinary memory are becoming ordinary with the advent
of the Internet (Net)! It seems the human cortex is undergoing an
evolutionary change by remapping the neural circuitry and re-organising
the way we remember things. In the earlier decades, we used to remember
lots of information, necessarily, as we didn't have search engines like
Google and databases such as Amazon.com, IMDb.com, etc., which serve as
external memory where information is stored collectively outside ourselves.
The focus now is on remembering only the access to information on the Net
rather than the contents, thus saving ourselves a lot of brain power' for
doing something other than the mundane activity of rote memorising.
Recent studies indicate that people are getting more and more primed to
click on a computer rather than engaging in interpersonal intellectual
communication with colleagues or friends. They are getting more cocooned.
The balance that the Net has brought is making people think, read and
memorise differently which some refer to as Google effect. Some aver that
the easy availability of information on the Net is leading to intellectual
laziness,' making them less memory-oriented' on certain aspects. The
studies have revealed a declining trend in memorising textual information,
which, anyway, is just a click away.
Thus the Net is playing the part of external or trans-active memory stored
outside our bodies, relegating the brains to act as index pages. But we may
use the spare capacity of the brain for a myriad other purposes. And it is
neither necessary nor possible to memorise detailed texts of information
pertaining even to the narrow field of specialisation of an individual. It
would be profitable to utilise the memory power for something more
creative and innovative. Moreover, we have developed a tendency to forage
the Web's info-thickets, reading, scanning highlights and blog-spots,
zooming on videos and listening to podcasts and jumping from link to link
to hyperlink, and zipping along the Net surface on a Jet Ski which robs us of
some memory reserve and time. And these days, we have to skim through
the vast amount of information to keep ourselves updated on multiple
fronts.
With all this, who has the time to savour Romeo and Juliet and War and
Peace? We just shouldn't blame the Internet or Google for its side-effects.
The advantages are too many to condemn them. It is just a need-based
evolution, and we should be prudent to have, in our limited human
medicines. He looked askance when I pronounced that the problem was TB,
perhaps thinking that I made a rash diagnosis.
He returned after a week and said that he had not started taking the
medicines. I found that Kumar learnt' a lot about tuberculosis by browsing
on the Net during the previous week. Diagnosis of TB was not acceptable to
him. He said he read about more tests for TB and wished that those tests be
done. He got them done Tuberculin Test, IgG, IgA, IgM, sputum studies,
PCR, CT scan, etc. Some of them came out to be negative for TB which
further confounded him.
I tried to convince him saying that recently (2011) the World Health
Organisation recommended against going by blood tests based on antibody
response for diagnosing active TB and that these expensive tests are
intensively promoted by vested interests. It didn't cut ice with him. He said
he wanted to wait for the results of culture and sensitivity tests as he
gathered information on the Google about the disastrous' side-effects
caused by the drugs and the dangers of drug resistance! And he asked me
about taking the medicine Imitanib (Gleevec) which has just (2011) been
suggested to be used in TB. While this tech-savvy patient knows a lot about
this drug, most of the doctors never even heard of it! He let the precious
time pass by, thanks to the Net for the overload of information.
Consequently, due to delay in commencing treatment, Kumar had a bout of
haemoptysis (coughing out of blood) and landed in an Intensive Care Unit,
fighting for life. This is another kind of Internet (Google) effect!
Teacher: Show me the homework done yesterday.
Student: Sir, I uploaded it on Facebook and tagged you!
(The writer is a pulmonologist at the Pay what you can' Clinic,
Perundurai, Erode district, Tamil
Nadu. drtramaprasad@gmail.com)
Keywords: Google
4. It has taken over our cell phones. Since the first Android phone was sold in 2008,
Googles mobile operating system has bulldozed the competition. Today it claims nearly
85% of market share, nearly doubling its hold over the last three years. Next stop, selfdriving cars?
5. It has transformed the way we use e-mail. Gmail was invented a decade ago, before
bottomless inboxes were a sine qua non. Its hard even to remember those dark ages when
storage space was sacredand deleting emails was as tedious-but-necessary as flossing.
Today our accounts serve as mausoleums, housing long-forgotten files, links, and even
wholerelationships. Google itself has touted alternative uses for Gmail, such as setting up a
virtual time capsule for your newbornthough in practice accounts cant be owned by
anyone under 13. But even that last point is about to change.
6. Its changed how we collaborate. Back in 2006, Google acquired the company
behind an online word processor named Writely. With that bet, Google created a world
where its taken for granted that people can collaborate on virtually any type of document,
whether for work, play, or (literally) revolution.
7. It has allowed us to travel the globe from our desks. Yes,MapQuest was popular
first. But Google Maps (and Earth) has become much more than a tool for measuring travel
routes and times. Since Google Street View came onto the scene in 2007, its been possible
to visit distant destinations, give friends a virtual tour of your hometown, plan ahead of
trips, and waste even more time on the Internet. Of course, the more popular a tool, the
more useful it is to those whod like to spy on us.
8. It has influenced the news we read. Ranking high in Google search results is serious
business and can have a profound effect on the success of companies, media outlets, and
even politicians. When I just Googled how SEO affects journalism, this link was at the top
of my search results. How is that significant? Well, for one, that story itself has been so
successfully search engine optimized that it still tops the list despite being four years old.
But most importantly, many of the concerns raised in the piece have not gone awaysuch as
the pressure to file some pithy blog post about the hot topic of the moment at the expense
of covering stories that would be prioritized based on traditional measures
of newsworthiness. What that means for you, the reader: more headlines like this and this.
9. It has turned users into commodities. We all love free stuff, but its easy to forget
that services offered by companies like Google and Facebook arent truly free, as data
expert Bruce Schneier has pointed out.Remember that all of your data (across ALL of the
services you use, and that includes Calendar, Maps, and so on) is a valuable good that
Google ispackaging and selling to its real customersadvertisers.
10. Its changed how everyone else sees YOU. Unlike your Facebook profile, the links
that turn up when potential employers (or love interests) Google you can be nearimpossible to erase. Perhaps unsurprisingly, Google uses the fear of embarrassing search
results to encourage people to manage their image through Google+ profiles.