Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
net)
Home > Healing Earth > Chapters > Energy > Energy and Ethics > Energy and Humans: A Brief History
Commons
Source: L,
Wikimedia Commons
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ACoal_lump.
R.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ACharcoal_B
Source:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AUS_coal_production_by_coalthemselves of fossil
producing_region%2C_2010.png
fuel
idea has completely vanished in the face of soil erosion, release of acid rain
and particulate matter, spread of greenhouse gases and toxic chemicals,
pollution of air and water, and warming of the atmosphere, all caused by
large-scale fossil fuel consumption.
In 2014, the amount of human deaths due to air pollution emitted by fossil
fuel use in China was estimated at 670,000. It is also estimated that in the
United States approximately 20,000 people die prematurely each year due
with permission
to fossil fuel pollution. Furthermore, world estimates put the global rate of
mortalities directly caused by the burning of fossil fuels at 3.1 million people
per year.1
Source:
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/imageo/2013/07/17/ai
pollution/#.VQC0_fnF9I4
Triple Bottom Line Accounting (TBL) is a method of full cost accounting that expands
a businesss bottom line calculation of profit and loss beyond labor and material
expenses (economic costs) to costs of ensuring social fairness in business practices and
product impact (social costs) and impacts of business operations on natural resources
(environmental costs). Read more on the possibilities and difficulties of TBL accounting.
Triplebotline (Own work) [CC BY-SA 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons
Source: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ATriple_Bottom_Line_graphic.jpg
Unfortunately, deeply-ingrained habits of life can be difficult to break. In developed countries today, fossil fuel
2
generators produce an enormous quantity of unsustainable energy at a relatively low market cost. In the transition
phase from unsustainable to sustainable energy, many people (especially in developed nations) will be called upon to
both reduce their energy consumption and pay more for the energy they use.
Furthermore, it is not only individual people who resist making lifestyle changes, but also political and economic
institutions, which typically favor stable routine over transformation. At all levels, change can be threatening and
difficult. It requires us to rethink our priorities, look at our fundamental values, and make serious decisions. In other
words, significant change in energy sources, use, and policy forces institutions and individuals to confront ethical
issues. The Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace affirms in its document Energy, Justice and Peace (hereafter
EJP), Energy transformations are never ethically neutral activities.2
As we continue to consider the ethical issues raised by energy, lets keep in mind the question posed at the end of the
El Hierro case study from the beginning of this chapter:
What contribution do the moral principles, goals, and virtues of Healing Earth make to our ethical judgments about
acquiring, using, and distributing energy?
Language English