Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
COR/2015/03246
October 20, 2015
159 Waterford Bridge Road
St. Johns, NL
A1B 4G3
Dear Des Sullivan:
RE: Your request for access to information under Part II of the Access to Information and
Protection of Privacy Act (Our File TW/047/2015)
Further to my prior Access to Information Request regarding an incident at
Roncalli School, St. John's involving the collapse of a cinder block wall which
occurred on or about September 22, 2014 , please provide the following
additional documentation/records/information: 1. A copy of all inspection
reports, if any, conducted by the Professional Engineer employed by the
Department of Transportation and Works (DTW), acting as the Project Manager
for the Roncalli School Expansion, on the structural integrity of concrete block
walls constructed on the school site. 2. A copy of all inspection reports by the
Prime Consultant, Stantec Architecture, on the subject of block wall construction
on the Roncalli construction project. 3. A copy of all inspections reports
performed by DBA Consulting Engineers Ltd. of the structural steel and block
work construction for the project. 4. A copy of inspection reports conducted by
ServiceNL for DTW on the wall collapse incident. 5. A copy of report(s)
conducted by Workplace Health and Safety on the wall collapse incident. 6. A
copy of a Certification by a Professional Structural Engineer confirming that the
structure, including the concrete block walls, constructed under contract to
Baraco Construction, have been built according to the design specifications
contained in the Engineering Drawings for the work. 7. A copy of all test results
performed on the integrity of the grout used to fill the subject concrete block walls
and confirmation they met the 20 Mpa specifications contained in the contract
documents. 8. A copy of all tests preformed on the Type "S" mortar confirming
work performed as specified in the contract documents. 9. Any inspection reports
that confirm the location and quantity of rebar used in the block work
P.O. Box 8700, St. Johns, NL, Canada, A1B 4J6
Page 2 of 9
construction and well as the masonry anchors to the structural steel and
horizontal reinforcement of block work used on the project. 10. A copy of the
Incident Report prepared by the Contractor at the time the incident was
discovered, and sent to DTW.
As the advisory response dated October 1, 2015 explained, the Workplace Health, Safety and
Compensation Commission does not have the legislative authority to play an investigative role in
a matter such as the wall collapse at the school as this falls under the purview of the
Occupational Health and Safety Division of Service NL. A previous Access to Information
Request has been submitted for these records, and is available on the ATIPP Offices website at
http://www.atipp.gov.nl.ca/ info/ completed/ 2015/pdf/ snl_ 34 _2015.pdf. Service NL has also
reviewed its records and determined that the Department does not have any further responsive
records to this request, in particular it has no further inspection reports for the Department of
Transportation and Works on the wall collapse other than the Occupational Health and Safety
Divisions reports referenced above.
Please note that while your request specified inspection reports prepared by the Department of
Transportation and Works Project Manager and/or Stantec Architecture, the Project Manager
with the department is not a structural engineer and therefore relies upon the expertise of an
external structural engineer to design and review structural elements of the building. The
structural design of Roncalli was subcontracted by Stantec Architecture to DBA Consulting
Engineers, LTD, which completed site inspections. These inspection reports are enclosed. No
inspection reports on the structural integrity of the building or any structural elements and review
of the block wall were prepared by the Departments Project Manager or Stantec Architecture.
In addition to the inspection process, the Department of Transportation and Works follows a
commissioning process that includes the review and approval of various building elements,
which are then reviewed and signed by departmental officials and the applicable external
consultant. As the project is not yet complete in its entirety, the commissioning manual is still
being compiled by the contractor. This manual is not yet in the custody and control of the
Department of Transportation and Works and therefore cannot be provided in response to this
ATIPP request as per section 5 of the Act, which specifies that the Act only applies to records in
the custody and control of the public body.
Access to the remaining requested records has been granted in part. The following records are
enclosed:
1. DBA Inspection Reports
2. Baraco Accident/Incident Report
In addition to the requested records, two reports from the Department of Transportation and
Works site visits to Roncalli are enclosed. These particular site visit reports provide further
information related to your request as they reference the construction of the masonry walls.
Page 3 of 9
Information contained within the records has been refused in accordance with the following
exceptions to disclosure, as specified in the Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act
(the Act):
40. (1) The head of a public body shall refuse to disclose personal information to
an applicant where the disclosure would be an unreasonable invasion of a third
party's personal privacy.
Please be advised that you may ask the Information and Privacy Commissioner to review the
processing of your access request, as set out in section 42 of the Access to Information and
Protection of Privacy Act (the Act). A request to the Commissioner must be made in writing
within 15 business days of the date of this letter or within a longer period that may be allowed by
the Commissioner.
The address and contact information of the Information and Privacy Commissioner is as follows:
Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner
2 Canada Drive
P. O. Box 13004, Stn. A
St. Johns, NL. A1B 3V8
Telephone: (709) 729-6309
Toll-Free: 1-877-729-6309
Facsimile: (709) 729-6500
You may also appeal directly to the Supreme Court Trial Division within 15 business days after
you receive the decision of the public body, pursuant to section 52 of the Act (a copy of this
section of the Act has been enclosed for your reference).
Please be advised that responsive records will be published following a 72 hour period after the
response is sent electronically to you or five business days in the case where records are mailed
to you. It is the goal to have the responsive records posted to the Office of Public Engagement's
website within one business day following the applicable period of time. Please note that
requests for personal information will not be posted online.
If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact the undersigned by telephone at
(709) 729-6814 or by e-mail at janinemurphy@gov.nl.ca
Sincerely,
Janine Murphy
ATIPP Coordinator
Department of Transportation and Works
Enclosures
Page 4 of 9
Section 5: Application
5. (1) This Act applies to all records in the custody of or under the control of a public body
but does not apply to
(a) a record in a court file, a record of a judge of the Court of Appeal, Trial Division, or
Provincial Court, a judicial administration record or a record relating to support services
provided to the judges of those courts;
(b) a note, communication or draft decision of a person acting in a judicial or quasijudicial capacity;
(c) a personal or constituency record of a member of the House of Assembly, that is in
the possession or control of the member;
(d) records of a registered political party or caucus as defined in the House of Assembly
Accountability, Integrity and Administration Act;
(e) a personal or constituency record of a minister;
(f) a record of a question that is to be used on an examination or test;
(g) a record containing teaching materials or research information of an employee of a
post-secondary educational institution;
(h) material placed in the custody of the Provincial Archives of Newfoundland
and Labrador by or for a person other than a public body;
(i) material placed in the archives of a public body by or for a person other than the
public body;
(j) a record relating to a prosecution if all proceedings in respect of the prosecution
have not been completed;
(k) a record relating to an investigation by the Royal Newfoundland Constabulary if all
matters in respect of the investigation have not been completed;
(l) a record relating to an investigation by the Royal Newfoundland Constabulary that
would reveal the identity of a confidential source of information or reveal information
provided by that source with respect to a law enforcement matter; or
(m) a record relating to an investigation by the Royal Newfoundland Constabulary in
which suspicion of guilt of an identified person is expressed but no charge was ever
laid, or relating to prosecutorial consideration of that investigation.
Page 5 of 9
Page 6 of 9
Page 7 of 9
Page 8 of 9
(5) In determining under subsections (1) and (4) whether a disclosure of personal
information constitutes an unreasonable invasion of a third party's personal privacy, the
head of a public body shall consider all the relevant circumstances, including whether
(a) the disclosure is desirable for the purpose of subjecting the activities of the
province or a public body to public scrutiny;
(b) the disclosure is likely to promote public health and safety or the protection of
the environment;
(c) the personal information is relevant to a fair determination of the applicant's
rights;
(d) the disclosure will assist in researching or validating the claims, disputes or
grievances of aboriginal people;
(e) the third party will be exposed unfairly to financial or other harm;
(f) the personal information has been supplied in confidence;
(g) the personal information is likely to be inaccurate or unreliable;
(h) the disclosure may unfairly damage the reputation of a person referred to in
the record requested by the applicant;
(i) the personal information was originally provided to the applicant; and
(j) the information is about a deceased person and, if so, whether the length of
time the person has been deceased indicates the disclosure is not an unreasonable
invasion of the deceased persons personal privacy.
Page 9 of 9