Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
R
OS
A
A/
P
R
A
M
S
m.
Sn.
(S
ain
s
Ki
mi
a)
By
NIROSA A/P RAMAN
Disahkan oleh:
..
Penyelia Utama
Nama:
Cop Rasmi:
Tarikh: ..........................
..
Ketua Jabatan Sains Kimia
Nama:
Cop Rasmi:
Tarikh: ............................
ii
DECLARATION
I hereby declare that this PITA research report entitled Isolation of Chemical
Compounds from Methanol Extract of Peperomia pellucida is the result of my own
research except as cited in the references.
Signature
Name
Matric No
Date
:.............................
: Nirosa a/p Raman
: UK20028
:............................
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank all those people made this thesis possible and enjoyable
experience for me. First of all, I wish to express my sincere gratitude to the
administration of the Department Of Chemistry, University Malaysia Terengganu for
giving me an opportunity to take up final year project during my final year of studies.
I am grateful to my supervisor, Dr Habsah bt Mohamad for her kind guidance and
sincere reprimands throughout my project commenced. Her kind consideration has
given me an opportunity to experience the real research world that I am about to
endure in near future. She has shown and taught me on how a life as a natural chemist
and a researcher in general is and the steps that an excellent personality would take to
make it a successful one. I would like also to thank my friends especially my research
group mate, R. Hemala, Nor Nadia, Nur Dalila, Nor Nabila, Tee Tek Jun, Nurul
Hidayah, Wan Siti Azierah and Yong Hwee Chin for their constant encouragement
and guidance.
I also would like to express my appreciation to all the chemists and lab assistants that
have helped and guided me throughout my project completion. Special thanks to Miss
Kamariah, Mr Tan Hock Seng, Mrs Desy Fitra and Miss Siti Aishah for helping with
my project in the lab. They have placed a lot of belief in me that it has eventually
helped me to become independent and confident with my skills and abilities.
Finally, my loving gratitude would go to my parents, Mr and Mrs. Raman Muthusamy
for their support, help and encouragement throughout completion of my final year
project. They have always been my inspiration in walking through the thick and thin
of a working life. Their sacrifices and hard work have all paid off well. Thank you all
once again who has directly or indirectly made my final year project a success.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE
BORANG PENGESAHAN DAN KELULUSAN LAPORAN KIM4999
DECLARATION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
ABSTRACT
ABSTRAK
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF PLATES
LIST OF SCHEMES
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
CHAPTER 1.0
CHAPTER 2.0
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction in Natural Products
1.2 Peperomia pellucida
1.3 Significance of the study
1.4 Objectives of the study
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Traditional Uses of Peperomia pellucida
2.2 Biological Activity studies on Peperomia pellucida
2.3 Previous Chemical Compounds Isolated from
Peperomia pellucida
2.4 Previous Phytochemical Screenings on
Peperomia pellucida
2.5 Chemical Variation in Genus Piperceae
2.5.1 Peperomia glabella
2.5.2 Peperomia blanda
vii
PAGE
i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
x
xi
xii
xiii
xiv
1
3
6
6
7
7
8
10
15
16
16
CHAPTER 3.0
METHODOLOGY
3.1 Collection and Preparation of Plant Sample
19
3.2 Solvent Extraction
19
3.2.1 Chemical Reagents used for cold extraction
21
3.2.2 Apparatus which used for cold extraction
21
3.3 Phytochemical Screenings
21
3.3.1 Alkaloid Test
21
3.3.2 Triterpenoid/ Steroid Test
21
3.3.3 Saponin Test
23
3.3.4 Flavonoid Test
24
3.3.5 Chemical Reagents used in the phytochemical
screenings
25
3.3.6 Apparatus which used in the phytochemical
screenings
25
3.3.7 Phytochemical Screening Reagent
3.3.7.1 Dragendroffs Reagent
26
3.4 Chemical Compound Isolation Techniques
26
3.4.1 Analytical Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) 26
3.4.2 Dry Column Vacuum Chromatography (DCVC)
3.4.2.1 Column Packing
28
3.4.2.2 Sample Crude Extract Application
28
3.4.2.3 Sample Crude Extract Elution
28
3.4.3 Gravity Column Chromatography (CC)
3.4.3.1 Column Preparation
29
3.4.3.2 Fraction Elution and Fraction Collection 29
3.4.4 Preparative TLC (PTLC)
29
3.4.4.1 Column Preparation
30
3.4.4.2 Sample Fraction Application
30
3.4.4.3 Sample Fraction Detection and Elution 30
3.4.5 Chemical Compounds Isolation Schemes
31
3.5 Characterization of Chemical Compounds by
Spectrophotometer Techniques
3.5.1 Fourier Tranform Infra Red Spectrometer (FT-IR)32
3.5.2 Ultra Violet Spectrometer (UV)
33
3.6 Characterization of Chemical Compounds
Using Spectroscopy Technique
3.6.1 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
(NMR)
33
3.7 Antibacterial Assay
3.7.1 Chemicals used
34
3.7.2 Microorganisms used
34
3.7.3 Antibacterial Activity Assay
34
3.8 Free Radical Scavenging AssayDetermination of DPPH Scavenging Activity
35
3.9 Total Phenolic Content
37
3.10 Determination of Powdered Sample Colour
with Different Chemical Reagents
38
CHAPTER 4.0
CHAPTER 5.0
REFERENCES
APPENDIX
CURRICULUM VITAE
39
39
40
41
41
42
43
43
44
45
47
49
49
49
60
71
73
74
75
76
77
78
84
86
LIST OF FIGURES
No
3.1
3.2
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
4.10
4.11
4.12
4.13
4.14
4.15
4.16
4.17
4.18
4.19
Figures
TLC Sheet
Mechanism of DPPH acceptor
Infrared Spectrum of compound PPM-1
UV Spectrum for Compound PPM-1 in CHCl3
1
H NMR Spectrum for Compound PPM-1 in
3
Deuterated-chloroform (CDCl )
13
C NMR Spectrum for Compound PPM-1 in
3
Deuterated-chloroform (CDCl )
13
APT, DEPT 135 and C NMR Spectra for Compound PPM-1
3
in Deuterated-chloroform (CDCl )
HMBC Spectrum for Compound PPM-1 in
3
Deuterated-chloroform (CDCl )
HMQC Spectrum for Compound PPM-1 in
3
Deuterated-chloroform (CDCl )
COSY Spectrum for Compound PPM-1 in
3
Deuterated-chloroform (CDCl )
Suggested fragments from PPC-5
Infrared Spectrum of compound PPC-5
UV Spectrum for Compound PPC-5 in CHCl3
1
H NMR Spectrum for Compound PPC-5 in
3
Deuterated-chloroform (CDCl )
1
H NMR Spectrum for Compound PPC-5 in
3
Deuterated-chloroform (CDCl ) (Expansion 1)
13
C NMR Spectrum for Compound PPC-5 in
Page
28
37
53
54
68
Deuterated-chloroform (CDCl )
HMBC Spectrum for Compound PPC-5 in
3
Deuterated-chloroform (CDCl )
HMQC Spectrum for Compound PPM-1 in
3
Deuterated-chloroform (CDCl )
COSY Spectrum for Compound PPM-1 in
3
Deuterated-chloroform (CDCl )
Free Radical Scavenging Activity by MeOH Extract of
Peperomia pellucida
Gallic Acid Standard Curve Graph
1
0
55
56
57
58
59
60
63
64
65
66
67
69
70
71
74
75
LIST OF PLATES
No.
1.1
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
Plates
Picture of Peperomia pellucida with descriptions
TLC Profiling of MeOH Crude Extract
TLC Profiling of M-1 until M-6
TLC Profiling of M-2-1 until M-2-11
Isolation and TLC Profiling of Fractions towards Isolation of PPC-5
and PPM-4
TLC Profiling of M-3-1 until M-3-15
Isolation and TLC Profiling of Fractions towards Isolation of PPM-1,
PPM-2 and PPM-3
Page
5
42
46
47
47
49
49
LIST OF SCHEMES
No.
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
Schemes
Schematic Diagram of Overall Extraction Procedure
Schematic Diagram of Alkaloid Test
Schematic Diagram of Triterpenoid/Steroid and Saponin Test
Schematic Diagram of Flavonoid Test
Schematic Diagram of Overall Chemical Compound Isolation
from Peperomia pellucida MeOH crude extract
Chemical Compounds isolation scheme of fraction M-2
Chemical Compounds isolation scheme of fraction M-3
xii
Page
21
23
25
26
32
32
33
LIST OF TABLES
No.
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
4.10
Table
Page
Stages of Turbidity to Categorize Alkaloid
23
Qualitative Scale for Triterpenoid/Steroid Test
24
Scale for Classification of Saponin in Emulsion Test
24
Classification of Flavonoid
26
Powdered Peperomia pellucida Sample with Different Reagents
39
Weight and Percentage Yield of Plant Sample and Crude Extract
40
Phytochemical Test Result on MeOH Crude Extract of
Peperomia pellucida
45
The Fraction M-1 until M-6 weight
45
Infra-red Characteristics Bands for Compound PPM-1
51
UV Absorbance Data Analysis of PPM-1
51
Infra-red Characteristics Bands for Compound PPC-5
61
UV Absorbance Data Analysis of PPC-5
62
1
13
1D-NMR ( H and C NMR) and 2D-NMR assignments for PPC-5
63
Antimicrobial Result for MeOH Crude Extract of Peperomia pellucida 72
Colour Characteristics of Powdered Peperomia pellucida with Different
Chemical Reagents
75
13
LIST OF ABBREVATIONS
ABBREVIATIONS
AS
CC
CH3COOH
CHCl3
CH3COCH3
COSY
d
DCM
DCVC
DEE
DMSO
DPPH
EtOAc
EtOH
FeCl3
FT-IR
Hep G2
HCl
HMBC
HMQC
HNO3
H2SO4
IC50
KOH
L6
m
MCF 7
Me
MeOH
min
MS
NMR
NOESY
Anisaldehyde
Column Chromatography
Acetic Acid
Chloroform
Acetone
Correlated Spectroscopy
duplet
Dichloromethane
Dry Column Vacuum Chromatography
Diethyl ether
Dimethyl sulfoxide
1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl
Ethyl Acetate
Ethanol
Ferric Chloride
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometer
Human Leukemia Cancer Cells
Hydrochloric Acid
Heteronuclear Multiple Bond Correlation
Heteronuclear Multiple Quantum Correlation
Nitric Acid
Sulphuric Acid
The Concentration of Compound that Inhibits Oxidation
of Radical by 50% Relative to The Control
Potassium Hydroxide
Normal Cell
multiplet
Breast Cell
Methyl
Methanol
Minute
Mass Spectroscopy
Nuclear Magentic Resonance Spectroscopy
Nuclear Overhauser Effect Spectroscopy
14
PE
PTLC
q
Rf
s
sp.
t
TLC
UV
1D
2D
Petroleum Ether
Preparative Thin Layer Chromatography
quartet
Retention Factor
singlet
Species
triplet
Thin Layer Chromatography
Ultraviolet Spectrometer
one dimensional
two dimensional
15
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Plant extracts which exist in the form of pure compounds or standardized extracts are
extracted from natural products (Sayeed, 2007) and it provides millions chances for
new drug discoveries. Based on the survey done by World Health Organisation
(WHO) a long time ago, it shows that more than 80% of world population is
depending on traditional medicine for their primary healthcare needs (Tshikalange et
al, 2004; Gordon & David, 2007; Himal et al., 2008; Suhanya et al., 2009; Egwuche et
al., 2011).
Natural products are assumed as pure and it possesses good properties. It is assumed
like that due to adjective natural incorporated when modes of treatment or
pharmaceutical product sources are made of it. The sources of natural products come
from various sources such as plants, animals, prebiotic origin or microbes (Satyajit,
2006; Cera et al., 2011). Natural products mainly consist of few classes of bioactive
compounds such as terpenoids, polyketides, amino acids, peptides, proteins,
carbohydrates,
lipids,
nucleic
acid
bases,
ribonucleic
acid
(RNA),
and
This leads the interest of many researchers to explore the diversity of local medicinal
plants for its valuable medicinal properties. The literature review shows that there are
many plants that have medicinal traits contain phytochemicals such as alkaloids,
essential oils, aldehydes, phenols, and ethanol or water soluble compounds. All these
phytochemical compounds are essential in therapeutic application to fight against
microorganisms such as bacteria, viruses, fungi and pathogens (Suhanya et al., 2009).
The bioactive compounds in the natural products contribute to the advancement of
natural products (Sayeed, 2007; Cera et al., 2011). In recent years, many new drugs
are developed to fight against these dangerous microorganisms due to the new
discoveries on natural products medicinal properties.
Natural products have made significant improvements in the new drug discovery
where vincristine, taxol and etoposide are the drugs of choice in treatment of cancer
chemotherapy (Lixin, 2005; Gordon & David, 2007; Donald, 2008). Determination of
pharmacology, toxicology and therapeutics of natural product plants are very essential
in the production of natural product based drugs or treatments. Understanding the
history, species origin, availability, chemical and physical properties of natural
products contributes to the studies done on drug discovery or product development
using natural products (Cera et al., 2011).
Even though this world is moving further towards modern medicine but the long
known traditional medicine based on plants or natural products are not forgotten either.
Traditional medicine already placed a secured position until now because of its
remarkable properties (Pulak, 2011). At this new era, the general public somehow has
developed insecurity feelings towards synthetic medicine and having an opinion that
naturally developed drugs are much safer. Many of them prefer to treat themselves
with traditional treatment because of the cost and safety suspicion on synthetically
derived drugs (Mutee et al., 2010). It is important to be able to measure the amount of
the active ingredient present in certain natural products to develop a large number of
useful drugs. Furthermore, it is more economical to extract them out from plant
material rather than synthesizing it.
1.2
Peperomia pellucida
Peperomia pellucida is an herb species of the Piperaceae family and 1000 over
species of Peperomia pellucida distributed mainly in Central and South America,
Africa, Australia, and South-East Asian countries (Leosvaldo et al., 2006; Paola et al,
2007; Akinnibosun et al, 2008; Pulak & Arun, 2011). Fifty to ninety species dispersed
in South-East Asia (Kiew, 1999; Khan et al., 2008; Mutee et al., 2010; Nguyen et al,
2010; Cera et al., 2011; Ganiyat et al., 2011). There are few other common name for
Peperomia pellucida such as shiny bush (in English), ketumpangan air (in Malay),
ulasiman-bato (in Tagalog) and phak krasang (in central Thailand) (Kiew, 1999).
Taxonomy of the plant is as follows (Mosango, 2000; Pulak & Arun, 2011; Cera et al.,
2011).
Kingdom: Plantae
Subkingdom: Tracheobiota
Superdivision: Spermatophyta
Division: Magnoliophyta
Class: Magnoliopsida
Subclass: Magnoliidae
Order: Piperales
Family: Piperaceae
Genus: Peperomia
Species: Peperomia pellucida (L.) Kunth
The plant is a small fleshy herb where it can grow up to 45 cm tall (Ferdinand, 2009).
The tiny dot-like seeds are attached to several fruiting spikes and when it is crushed, it
has mustard like odour (Kiew, 1999; Pulak, 2011). Peperomia pellucida grows in
clumps, thriving in loose, humid soils and a tropical to subtropical climate with
translucent green heart-shaped fleshy and shiny waxy succulent alternate and ovate
leaves, with terminal and axillary efflorescence, at the opposite side from leaves,
develops well in loose and humid soil by the tree shadows (Arrigoni-Blank et al.,
2004; Ritson & Duvita, 2007; Akinnibosun et al., 2008; Ferdinand, 2009; Nguyen et
al, 2010; Egwuche et al., 2011; Pulak, 2011, Cera et al., 2011).
It is also has a thread like but angular trailing stem and the flower are very tiny,
bisexual growing in the form of cord like spikes arising from leaf axils, 1 to several,
terminal and axillary or leaf-opposed, well spaced, and unremarkable (Arrigoni-Blank
et al., 2004; Ritson & Duvita, 2007; Akinnibosun et al., 2008; Egwuche et al., 2011;
Pulak, 2011, Cera et al., 2011).
Leaf
Fruit/ Seed
Ste
m
Thread like angular trailing
stem
Fleshy, translucent pale
green
Succulent
Root
Plate 1.1
Shallow root
1.3
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
Peperomia pellucida is a common thriving terrestrial plant that grows on humid soil.
Peperomia pellucida is from genus Piperaceae and it has many valuable properties
such
as
medicinal
properties,
antioxidant,
antimicrobial
and
many more.
and
Peperomia pellucida has been known for its medicinal properties (Bayma et al.,
2000). The infusion or decoction of leaves and stems are used to treat gout and
arthritis where it is included in daily meal as salad (Susie et al., 2000; Khan &
Omoloso, 2002; Mutee et al., 2010; Nguyen et al, 2010; Pulak, 2011; Pulak & Arun,
2011). The plant is used in traditional medicine in treatment of measles, small pox,
male impotence, mental disorders, and breast cancer (Aziba et al., 2000; Khan &
Omoloso, 2002; Ganiyat et al., 2011).
Egwuche et al., (2011) stated that Peperomia pellucida is used as emollient and
diuretic. It is also stated that cardiac arrhythmia and cough can be controlled and
cured with Peperomia pellucida. Peperomia pellucida leaves are used in the treatment
of headache, fever, eczema, abdominal pains and convulsions (Arrigoni-Blank et al.,
2004; Alam et al., 2008; Ferdinand, 2009; Alam et al., 2010; Ganiyat et al., 2011; Lee
et al., 2011). In folk medicine, this species is employed on abscesses, furuncles, and
skin sores, as well as eye inflammation (conjunctivitis) (Arrigoni-Blank et al., 2002;
Su et al., 2005; Pulak, M., 2011, Cera et al., 2011).
It is traditionally used to treat boils, skin wounds, trauma, and bleeding (Su et al.,
2005; Khan & Omoloso, 2002; Ritson & Duvita, 2007; Mutee et al., 2010). Arthritic
pains can be relieved by consuming Peperomia pellucida but according to Manila
Medical Society, patient can be attacked by CNS depression which is caused by
Peperomia pellucida (Khan et al., 2008; Alam et al., 2010). In South America,
Peperomia pellucida are used medicinally in a way where the fresh stem and leaves
juice is extracted and used to treat eye inflammation (Pulak, 2011).
2.2
Based on Lee et al., (2011) research revealed that Peperomia pellucida leaf extract
contains anticancer properties. It also has antibacterial properties. The antibacterial
properties were shown clearly when Peperomia pellucida extract inhibited the growth
of eight bacteria which were Edwardsiella tarda, Escherichia coli, Flavobacterium sp.,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Vibrio cholera, Klebsiella sp., Aeromonas hydrophilla and
Vibrio alginolyticus while it also limits the growth of Salmonella sp. and Vibrio
parahaemolyticus. Moreover, antioxidant properties exhibited by Peperomia pellucida
leaf extract by inhibiting 30% of 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), free radical.
Significant antibacterial activities against ten bacteria were also shown by the plant
extract. The bacteria used for the assay were Escherichia coli, Staphylcoccus aereus,
Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiellae pneumonae, Salmonellae
typhi, Candida albicanas, Rhizopus stolon, Aspergillus niger and Penicullum notatum.
Other than that, Peperomia pellucida showed antioxidant properties as well. It was
determined by comparing it with the standards which are butylated hydroxyl anisole
(BHA), ascorbic acid and -tocopherol (Ganiyat et al., 2011).
induced rat hind paw edema was significantly reduced (p< 0.05) by 1000 mg kg of
Peperomia pellucida extract compared to the control (p<0.01) (Mutee et al., (2010).
Maria et al., (2002) stated that phenophases I and II of aqueous Peperomia pellucida
extract shows a considerable anti-inflammatory activity. The assay was performed on
wistar rats using rat paw edema test induced by carrageenan. Other than that, toxicity
of crude extracts from Peperomia pellucida also was determined where methanol,
hexane and ethyl acetate fractions were toxic while buthanol and water fractions were
non toxic. It was determined through brine shrimp lethality tests (Ganiyat et al., 2011).
Khan and Omoloso (2002) also proved that methanol extract of Peperomia pellucida
has good antimicrobial activity. The crude fractions also exhibited antibacterial
properties where the fractions were more active compared to the crude extract.
Microorganisms used in the assay were bacteria, fungi and protozoan obtained from
stock cultures.
Short report by Aziba et al., (2001) showed a significant analgesic activity on acetic
acid-induced writhing in mice when methanol extract of Peperomia pellucida aerial
parts given orally at doses ranging from 70 21 mg/kg.
2.3
Alam et al., (2010) isolated a xanthone glycoside, patuloside A (3--Dglucopyranosyloxy-1,5,6-trihydroxy-9H-xanthene-9-one) (1). The isolated compound
1
HO
OH
OH
CH2OH
O
OH
HO
OH
Govindachari et al., (1998), Su et al., (2005), and Chen and Dong (2006) isolated and
characterized few secolignans. The compounds were 2-methylene-3-[(3,4,5trimethoxyphenyl)(5-methoxy-3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)methyl]butylrolactone (2),
2, 3 trans 2 methyl 3 - [(3 hydroxyl 4, 5 - dimethoxyphenyl) (5 methoxy
3,4- methylenedioxyphenyl)methyl]butylrolactone (3) and peperomins A (4), B (5), C
(6) (Chen & Dong, 2006) and E (7) (Govindachari et al., 1998).
R3
R1
R4
R2
R5
R6
R8
R7
R1
2
R2
CH2
R3
R4
R5
OCH2O
R6
R7
R8
OCH2O
OCH3
OCH2O
OCH3
OCH3 OCH3
OCH2O
OCH2O
CH2
OCH2O
Su et al., (2005) research, thirteen compounds were isolated where five of it were new
compounds. The isolated compounds were characterized using IR, UV, NMR and MS
spectroscopy techniques. Thirteen isolated compounds were 7,8-trans-8,8-trans-7,8cis 7, 7 bis (5 methoxy 3, 4 - methylenedioxyphenyl) 8 acetoxymethyl 8-hydroxymethyltetrahydrofuran, 7,8trans8,8trans-7,8cis7-(5methoxy3,4methylenedioxyphenyl) - 7 - (4 hydroxyl - 3, 5 - dimethoxyphenyl) - 8, 8 diacetoxymethyltetrahydrofuran, peperomins A, B, C, E, sesamin (8), isoswertisin
(Webby
&
Markham,
1994),
7,8-trans-8,8-trans-7,8-cis-7-(5methoxy3,4-
methylenedioxyphenyl)-7-(4hydroxyl3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)8acetoxymethyl8hydroxymethyltetrahydrofuran (9),
7,8trans8,8trans-7,8cis7,7-(4-hydroxyl-3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-8,8diacetoxymethyltetrahydrofuran (10) and 5,6,8trimethoxy 4 - (2, 4, 5 trimethoxyphenyl) 3, 4 dihydro 1(2H) - naphthalenone also known as
dihydronaphthalenone (11).
O
O
O
O
O
O
R1
OCH3
HO
R2
H3CO
OCH3
OAc
R 3O
R1
R2
OCH2O
10
OCH3 OH
R3
H
Ac
OCH3 O
H3CO
OCH3
H3CO
OCH3
OCH3
11
Other than that, a novel dimeric ArC2 compound (pellucidin A) (12), apiol (13), and
dill-apiol (14) was isolated by Bayma et al., (2000). Structural confirmation was done
with IR, MS, 1D and 2D NMR spectroscopy.
H
H
H
H
OMe
MeO
OMe
OMe
OMe
OMe
12
R1
O
O
R3
R2
R1
13
OCH3
14
R2
R3
OCH3
OCH3
H
OCH3
Manalo et al., (1983) isolated few compounds from Peperomia pellucida plant and the
compounds are 2,4,5-trimethoxy styrene (15), campesterol (16), stigmasterol (17), and
-sitosterol (18).
OCH3
H3CO
OCH3
15
H
H
HO
16
H
H
H
HO
17
H
H
HO
18
Aqil et al., (1994) isolated few flavonoid compounds such as pellucidation (19),
pellucidatin-8-neoliesperid (20), apigenin (21), acacetin (22) and isovitexin (23).
R4
R1
H3CO
R2
R3
OH
2.4
R1
R2
R3
R4
19
OH
OCH3
20
O-glc-rha
OCH3
21
22
OCH3
23
glc
OH
OCH3
OCH3
OCH3
OCH3
OH
Ritson and Duvita (2007) proven that alkaloids, saponins, steroids, triterpenoids,
flavonoids and phenol were present in the Peperomia pellucida plant extract.
Alkaloids were present in ethanol crude extract, hexane fraction, chloroform fraction
and aqueous fraction. Saponins are only present in ethanol crude extract and aqueous
fraction. Besides that, steroids were absent in ethanol crude extract and flavonoids
were present in ethanol crude extract and aqueous fraction. Other than that, phenol
were absent in hexane fraction and chloroform fraction.
2.5
OH
O
CH3
H3C
O
CH3
24
(25),
4,5-methylenedioxy-
MeO
RO
MeO
OMe
R
25
26
Me
MeO
MeO
OMe
OH
MeO
OMe
27
O
O
MeO
OMe
28
OH
MeO
MeO
O
O
MeO
OMe
29
The antitripanosomal properties of these novel lignans have been determined as well
in the studies. The structures of the isolated compounds were elucidated by
interpretation of their spectroscopic data including by HMQC, HMBC and NOESY.
Four of the lignans were diastereomeric while one was of mixed biosynthetic origin.
All but one of the lignans exhibited high in vitro trypanocidal activity when assayed
against epimastigotes of Trypanosoma cruzi strain Y.
CHAPTER 3
METHODOLOGY
3.1
Solvent Extraction
The crude extraction of the powdered plant samples was based on solvent polarity.
The powdered plant samples were extracted with less polar solvent first before it was
extracted with increasing solvent polarity. Firstly, the grounded plant samples soaked
in dichloromethane (DCM) at room temperature for two days before it was filtered to
collect the extract filtrate. The process then repeated until almost clear filtrate was
obtained. The soaked plant samples filtered using Buchner vacuum filter set with
Whatmann filter paper no 2.
The solvent in the extract was evaporated using rotary evaporator at 40 C under
reduced pressure (Alam et al., 2010). The left over solvent then removed by leaving
the crude extract in the laminar fume hood for nearly a week. Secondly, the DCM
residue soaked in ethyl acetate (EtOAc) for six times with the same procedure again.
Finally, the EtOAc residue then extracted with methanol (MeOH) for six times again
by the same procedure as DCM extraction.
The crude extract obtained then used for pure chemical compound isolation,
phytochemical screenings and biological activity assay. The summary of the
extraction procedure and chemical compound isolation scheme is shown in the
schematic diagram 3.1.
5kg of whole fresh Peperomia pellucida handpicked
Plant samples were air dried
The air dried samples were grounded into powder form
Samples were soaked in DCM
DCM extract
DCM Residue
EtOAc Residue
EtOAc Extract
Soaked in MeOH
MeOH Crude Extract
TLC Profiling
Chemical Compound Isolation
Phytochemical Screening
Biological Activity Assay
Scheme 3.1
20
Phytochemical screenings
Observation
Scale
Result
No changes
Negative
+1
Positive
+2
Positive
+3
Positive
+4
Positive
+5
Positive
The solution again was filtered and the filtrate was dried at room temperature. The
dried sample was then added with one or two drops of H2SO4 and 3-5 drops of acetic
anhydride (Houghton and Amala, 1998; Himal et al., 2008). Finally, the colour
changes of the solution was observed and classified according to Table 3.2 (Houghton
and Amala, 1998).
Table 3.2
Triterpenoid
Steroid
No Changes
Negative
Negative
Red Colouration
Positive
Negative
Negative
Positive
Scale
Result
Negative
+1
Positive
+2
Positive
+3
Positive
+4
Positive
Residue
Filtrate
Added with 3-5 drops
of acetic anhydride
Added with 1/2 drops
of H2SO4
Residue
observed
for bubble
(Saponin Test)
Green/Blue Colouration
(Positive Steroid)
Table 3.4
Classification of Flavonoid
Colouration
Component
No changes
Negative
Orange to Red
Flavones
Red to Cream
Flavanol
Cream to Magenta
Flavanon
Green to Blue
Flavanon
Source: Houghton & Amala (1998)
200 mg MeOH crude extract + EtOH
Solution filtered
Test Tube A
(control)
Test Tube B
Added with Mg tape
Added with 0.5ml of concentrated HCl
Colour changes observed
Scheme 3.4
For working solution, 100 ml stock solution was mixed with 200 ml of glacial acetic
acid and distilled water was added until the final volume of the solution is 1 L. Finally,
the Dragendroffs reagent was stored in dark glass bottle after it is prepared.
3.4
The amount of the solvent system should not be more than the spot on the sheet. The
TLC sheet placement allows the suitable solvent system to move up the sheet. The
solvent system moved up based on capillary action and the compounds in the sample
fraction were dissolved in the solvent and moved together with the solvent. The
movement of the compounds based on solubility and diffraction differences
(Houghton & Amala, 1998).
TLC was taken out after the solvent system reached the solvent front. It was air dried
to allow the solvent to dry out and then the sheet was observed under UV short wave
(254 nm) and UV long wave (336 nm). UV short wave was used to identify
compounds containing conjugated double bonds and some fluorescent compounds that
usually have extended electron system. UV long wave was used to identify some
fluorescent compounds. After that, the sheet was placed in closed iodine chamber to
leave the sheet get contact with iodine vapour and was removed after a while. This
was done to identify many types of compounds particularly if there is double bonds
present in the compounds (Houghton & Amala, 1998).
Finally, the TLC sheet was sprayed with anisaldehyde (AS) reagent. AS reagent was
sprayed to observe terpenoid compounds that will give purple, blue or red spot. It was
also sprayed to observe some other compounds like lignans, sugars and flavonoids.
AS reagent were prepared by mixing 0.5 % of AS in sulphuric acid, glacial acetic acid
and methanol in the ratio 5: 10: 85 accordingly (Houghton & Amala, 1998).
Solvent Front
5 cm
left to dry in the air and in the oven at 105 C for a day (Houghton & Amala, 1998; De
et al, 2010).
3.4.4.2 Sample Fraction Application
The sample fraction was dissolved in suitable solvent and the sample loaded on the
baseline of the dried preparative plate for 13 cm long starting 2 cm from bottom and
3.5 cm from the left edge (Houghton & Amala, 1998). Then, the plate was developed
in closed tank containing chloroform acetone 9.5:0.5 solvent system until 16 cm from
the baseline.
3.4.4.3 Sample Fraction Detection and Elution
After the plate was fully developed, it was left to dry and after that, it was observed
under UV light (long wave 365 nm and shortwave 254 nm) to detect and mark the
eluted band of the loaded sample. The marked band was then scraped off carefully
from the plate onto Whatmann filter paper No 1. The scraped silica sample was
filtered with acetone into pre weighed vial. The filtrate was then allowed evaporating,
the weight of the vial was measured after that and finally the weight of pure
compound was calculated (Houghton & Amala, 1998). The summary of the chemical
compound isolation scheme is shown in the schematic diagram 3.5, 3.6 and 3.7.
M-1
0.22 g
M-2
1.84 g
PPC-5
10.1 mg
Scheme 3.5
PPM-4
4.5 mg
M-3
2.12 g
PPM-1
3.4 mg
M-4
1.25 g
M-5
7.85 g
PPM-2
2.29 mg
PPM-3
4.8 mg
M-6
13.72 g
PPM
M-2 (1.84 g)
CC, silica gel Kieselgel 60 (0.0400.063 mm) 25 cm x 1 cm CHCl3,
CH3COCH3, MeOH gradient
M-2-1 until M-2-3
M-2-4 (23.4 mg) M-2-6 (10 mg) M-2-5, M-2-8 until M-2-11
PPC-5
10.1 mg
PPM-4
4.5 mg
Scheme 3.6 Chemical Compounds isolation scheme of fraction M-2
PPM
M-3 (2.12 g)
CC, silica gel Kieselgel 60
(0.040-0.063 mm) 3 cm x 20 cm
PE, CH3COCH3, MeOH gradient
M-3-1 until M-3-4
PPM-1
10.1 mg
PPM-2
2.29 mg
PPM-3
4.8 mg
-1
13
3.7
Antibacterial Assay
The bacteria were maintained on nutrient agar (NA) and stored at 4 C. The bacteria
cultures were then dissolved in 9 ml autoclave distilled water using sterile saline. The
concentrations of cultures were adjusted with 0.5 McFarland standards to adjust the
turbidity of bacterial suspensions (Igbinosa et al., 2009). All the bacteria were
obtained from Institute of Marine Biotechnology, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu.
3.7.3 Antibacterial Activity Assay
Antibacterial activity assay was determined using disc diffusion method (Ates &
Erdogrul, 2003; Leland et al., 2006; Krittika et al., 2007; Chen et al., 2008; Joy et al.,
2008; Vallinayagam et al., 2009; Suhanya et al., 2009; Alam et al., 2010; Sangeetha,
2010; Govindappa et al., 2011; Tan et al., 2011).
Samples of methanol crude extract were loaded onto each Whatmann No 1 filter paper
discs (, 6 mm) in series of concentration, i.e. 2000 g/disc, 1000 g/disc,
500
g/disc, 250 g/disc and 125 g/disc (Gislene et al., 2000). The paper discs
were placed in the laminar flow hood to remove stock solution solvent (Mohamad &
Wong,
1999). The 200 L suspensions of the bacteria was swabbed using cotton swap on
Muller Hinton agar media.
The discs were located on the surface of the previous inoculated agar. The plates were
0
inverted and incubated for 24 hours at 37 C (Gislene et al., 2000; Tshikalange et al,
2004; Akinnibosun et al, 2008; Shahid-ud-daula & Mohamad, 2009). Clear inhibition
zones around the disc were measured after the incubation period edge of paper disc
(Ates & Erdogrul, 2003). The positive and negative controls were used for each
bacterium.
3.8
The absorbance was measured at 517 nm using Elisa UV/Visible light readers
(Multiskan ascent, thermo electron corporation) against as DMSO as blank (control)
where the control contained 20 l DMSO and 200 l DPPH (Kumaran & Joel,
2006; Kai et al., 2007; Ayoola et al., 2008; Chan et al., 2008; Chen et al., 2008;
Nabavi et al,
2008; Ye et al., 2008; Ebrahimzadeh et al., 2008; Suhanya et al., 2009; Mutee et al.,
2010; Lee et al., 2011; Govindappa et al., 2011; Tan et al., 2011; Mukram et al.,
2012).
Free radical scavenging activity determined according to the equation below.
Free Radical Scavenging Activity (%) = (Ac As)/ Ac x 100%
where Ac is control absorbance and As is sample absorbance.
N
O 2N
NO2
NO2
Figure 3.2
RH
O2 N
NH
NO2
NO2
3.9
With slight modification on Folin-Ciocalteu method and the method was used for the
determination of total phenolic content in methanol extract of Peperomia pellucida
(Chan et al., 2008; Chen et al., 2008; Nabavi et al, 2008; Ebrahimzadeh et al., 2008;
Suhanya et al., 2009; Mutee et al., 2010; Govindappa et al., 2011; Tan et al., 2011).
Firstly, 20 l of MeOH extract was mixed with 100 l of 2 N Folin-Ciocalteu
reagent. The mixture was then left for incubation at room temperature for 8 minutes.
After the incubation, 300 l of Na2CO3 (20 % w/v) was pipette into the previous
mixture.
1.58 mL of distilled water was also poured into the mixture after that. Then, the
mixture was left for incubation for 2 hours at room temperature. Absorbance at 760
nm was measured for the mixture after that. Besides that, gallic acid at concentration
-1
ranging from 0.0625 0.5 mg/ml was prepared to obtain a calibration curve of gallic
acid (Mutee et al., 2010). Finally, total phenolic content was expressed in terms of
Gallic acid Equivalents (GAE). GAE was calculated using the following formula:
C= (c x V) / m
Where C is total phenolic content
c is the concentration of gallic acid from the calibration curve (mg/mL)
V is volume (1 mL)
-3
3.10
Air dried Peperomia pellucida plant sample in the powdered form was used in this
determination to study on pharmacognostical of Peperomia pellucida. This
observation contributed to the identification of pharmacognostical and stardardization
of the drug in the crude form. The powdered sample was mixed with different
reagents based on the Table 3.5 to observe the colour changes when it is seen in the
naked eye (Pulak, 2011).
Table 3.5
CHAPTER 4
The aim of the study was to isolate and characterize pure chemical compounds from
methanol extract of Peperomia pellucida. The methodology used to achieve the
objectives were crude extraction, chemical compounds isolation by various
chromatography techniques, and chemical compound structure identification by
various spectroscopy techniques. The structural identification was done based on the
comparison with previous studies.
4.1
Collected Peperomia pellucida plant samples were air dried, grinded into powder and
macerated subsequently with dichloromethane (DCM), ethyl acetate (EtOAc) and
methanol (MeOH) solvent. MeOH crude was used for chemical compound isolation
and it is labelled as PPM. Table 4.1 shows the weight and percentage yield of
Peperomia pellucida plant sample and MeOH crude extract.
Table 4.1
Weight
33.75 g
Weight
9.119 kg
344.7 g
321.9 g
3.78 %
Percentage Yield
10.48%
Maceration of plant sample was done using three different solvent which were DCM,
EtOAc and MeOH. All these three solvents have different solvent polarities where it
extracted compounds with different polarity from the plant. Since DCM has semi
polar solvent polarity therefore it extracted out semi polar lipid-like compounds and
EtOAc extracted out polar chemical compounds since EtOAc is a polar solvent.
Finally, MeOH is also a polar solvent so it extracted out polar compounds which are
more phenolic.
4.2
TLC profiling was done on methanol crude extract to identify the presence of
chemical compounds. Chemical compounds have different retention factor, Rf values
when it is was separated in different solvent system based on their polarity.
Appropriate solvent system was selected to separate the pure chemical compounds
using column chromatography. Selection of suitable solvent system was done by
analyzing the Rf values of chemical compounds in different solvent systems.
TLC profiling was done on crude extract with solvent system of chloroform/acetone
3:7 and visualised by normal visualisation, UV short wave (254 nm), UV long wave
(365 nm), iodine vapors and anisaldehyde (AS) reagent. Plate 4.1 shows TLC
profiling of MeOH crude extract with TLC.
40
Plate 4.1
4.3
Phytochemical Screening
Alkaloid, triterpenoid, steroid, flavonoid and saponin test were done on methanol
crude extract. The screening methods were based on standard procedures outlined in
Houghton and Amala (1998).
4.3.1 Alkaloid test
Dragendroffs reagent was used to test the availability of alkaloid in methanol crude
and it showed positive result since precipitate formed immediately. Table 4.2 shows
the alkaloid test result for the crude extract.
The presence of alkaloid was determined based on colour changes observed when
became turbid and
acidic solution was added with Dragendroffs reagent. Acidic
yellow precipitate formed when few drops of reagent was added into the acidic
solution.
This makes the result to show that there is no terpenoid or steroid in methanol crude
extract. This might be due to high quantity of pigment present in the methanol crude
extract which makes it is hard to determine the colour change of the solution.
Table 4.2
Phytochemical
Screening Test
Alkaloid
Positive alkaloid
+4
(Immediate prepicipitate formation
Triterpenoid/Steroid
Negative triterpenoid
No changes
Negative steroid
Positive saponin
+4
(Emulsion remains 3 hours)
Flavonoid
Orange to red
Positive flavonoid
(Flavones)
4.4
Dry column vacuum chromatography (DCVC) packed with preparative TLC silica
(Merck, Kieselgel 60 PF264) was used for first chemical compound isolation and 33.75
g of methanol crude extract was used. The height of the column was 4.5 cm and the
diameter of the column was 10 cm. The solvent system used was chloroform : acetone:
methanol by increasing gradient. This allowed good elution of crude and a total of six
fractions obtained. The recovery percentage was only 80% due to high pigment
contain in the crude extract. Table 4.3 shows the weight of fractions collected prior to
DCVC and Plate 4.2 shows the TLC profiling of the fractions.
Table 4.3
Weight (g)
0.22
1.84
2.12
1.25
7.85
13.72
27.00
Plate 4.2
The combined fractions were analysed with TLC by visualization with normal, UV
light short wave (264 nm), UV light long wave (365 nm), iodine vapours and
(AS). M-2-4 was chosen to purify with PTLC with solvent
anisaldehyde reagent
system chloroform: acetone 8:2. Yellow liquid PPC-5 was successfully isolated as
pure chemical compound with a weight of 10.1 mg. M-2-6 was chosen to be purified
with PTLC with solvent system chloroform: acetone 8:2. Light yellow PPM-4 (4.5
mg) was successfully isolated. Plate 4.3 shows TLC profiling of M-2-1 until M-2-11
and Plate 4.4 shows isolation and TLC profiling of fractions towards isolation of PPC5 and PPM-4.
Plate 4.3
Plate 4.4
Fraction M-3-5 was chosen to be purified with PTLC with solvent system petroleum
ether: acetone 8:2. A dark blue band found at PTLC under the examination of UV
light long wave (365 nm). The band was scraped and the silica was filtered. A pure
compound PPM-1 (3.4 mg) was obtained. Fraction M-3-7 was chosen to be purified
with PTLC with solvent system chloroform: acetone 9.5:0.5. A dark blue band was
observed at PTLC under examination of long wave UV light (365 nm). The band then
was scraped off and subjected to filtration to obtain a pure compound, PPM-2 (2.29
mg). A dark green band was observed at PTLC under the examination of short wave
UV light (254 nm). The band was scraped and the silica was filtered. A pure
compound PPM-3 (4.8 mg) was obtained.
Fraction M-3-10 was chosen for further purification with gravity column
chromatography and total 135 fractions were collected. Similar pattern fractions were
combined into 23 fractions labelled as M-3-10-1 until M-3-10-23. The separation was
not efficient and further purification was not successful. Plate 4.5 shows TLC
profiling of M-3-1 until M-3-15 and Plate 4.6 shows isolation and TLC profiling of
fractions towards PPM-1, PPM-2 and PPM-3.
Plate 4.5
Plate 4.6
The compounds were characterized with various instruments to look for the actual
structure. The instruments used were IR, UV and NMR spectroscopy.
4.5.1 PPM-1
PPM-1 (3.4 mg) which is odourless was isolated as a colourless solid. Its molecular
structure was characterized using spectral data and comparison with literature values.
-1
indicating the
-1
clearly shown by the presence of strong C-H stretching (sp ) at 2923.81 cm and
-1
-1
and 1716.00 cm
-1
indicated the
-1
Table 4.4
Wavenumber (cm )
Assignments
3367.07
O-H stretching
-C-H sp stretching
C=O stretching
1455.75
1020.16
C-O stretching
798.52
PPM-1 was analyzed by UV-Vis spectroscopy (Figure 4.2) in the wavelength ranging
from 200 nm to 500 nm. Four absorbance peaks were obtained from the spectrum,
where the maximum wavelengths (max) were 329.50 nm, 308.50 nm, 242.50 nm and
221.00 nm (Table 4.5). The solvent cut off point of CHCl3 solvent was max 242.50
nm. max 329.50 nm and 308.50 nm indicated the to * transitions in this compound.
Table 4.5 UV-Vis absorbance data analysis of PPM-1
Number of peak
Wavelength (nm)
Absorbance
329.50
0.1449
308.50
0.1838
The H NMR (Figure 4.3) data of PPM-1 disclosed a triplet (J = 6.8 MHz) at 0.907.
It is also afforded a downfield multiplet at 1.280, a proton singlet at 1.581.
13
The C NMR (Figure 4.4) spectrum of PPM-1 exhibited signals 5 carbon atoms. One
of which was assigned to a methyl group (14.21 ppm), two signals to methylene group
(22.70 ppm and 29.37 ppm), one signal to a long chain methylene group (29.71ppm)
and another one signal to quaternary carbon group (31.94 ppm). At 77.011 ppm,
there is a triplet peak observed which is CHCl3 solvent.
According to DEPT (Figure 4.5) spectra, all this carbon is group into 3 different
proton substituted carbon, the spectra showed one methyl (CH3) group, three
methylene (CH2) groups and one quaternary carbon in this compound.
The triplet signal at 0.907 in the H NMR spectrum which corresponded to the
13
NMR signal at 14.12 ppm showed HMBC (Figure 4.6) correlation to methylene group
(22.70 ppm), a methylene group (29.37 ppm) and quaternary carbon (31.94 ppm).
Further, there were HMBC correlations between 1.29 to methyl group (14.12 ppm),
methylene group (22.70 ppm) and long chain methylene group (29.71 ppm). These
correlations further supported in HMQC. There is no correlations can be seen in
COSY.
All the data were combined to discover the structure of the compound but due to
insufficient data, structure of the isolated compound (PPM-1) was unable to be
determined. The obtained data was insufficient because the quantity of PPM-1 was
very little.
100.0
95
45 2.34
90
46 8.49
85
80
75
39 18.3 5
38 35.1 2
70
65
42 1.88
39 00.8 9
60
55
52
52
%T
50
45
40
37 48.2 0
35 8 8.0 7
79 8.52
35 62.7 5
35 45.5 2
35 24.5 4
35 02.7 033 67.0 7
77 2.68
23 22.7 2
35
30
(C-H) oop
12 60.2 4
(O-H)
17 16.0 0
14 55.7 5
11 57.7 0
25
17 46.8 5
20
10 20.1 6
(C-H )
28 53.6 4
(C=O)
15
10
(C-O) stretching
29 23.8 1
(C-H) sp
5
0.0
4000.0
3600
3200
2800
2400
Figure 4.1
2000
1800
1600
cm-1
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400.0
max = 242.50 nm
53
53
max = 308.50 nm
max = 329.50 nm
Figure 4.2
(CH2)
54
CH3
54
Figure 4.3
55
55
Figure 4.4
13
CH2
APT
CH2
CH2
DEPT
135
56
CH3
56
13
Figure 4.5
13
L. .
PPM1 HMBC
ppm
10
..
,' l
--
:-- 30
' I .
I:-
40
I:-
50
1'-
60
i'-
70
1'-
80
E- 90
100
110
120
130
140
150
8.5 8.0
0.5 0.0
Figure 4.6
7.5
7.0 6.5
6.0
5.5
5.0
4.5
4.0 3.5
1.5
1.0
ppm
PPM1 HMQC
ppm
f- 10
1- 20
..
1r
=---
Vl
".k:.
r 30
_,.
f- 40
00
1- 50
r 60
1- 70
'
r 80
I
r 90
6.5
6.0
2.0
5.5
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2. 5
1.0
0.5
0. 0
-0.5
1.5
Figure 4.7
-1 .0
ppm
PPMl.
COSY
ppm
-1
o- c:::;, @
0'
ail
8
9.0
8.5
8.0
Figure 4.8
7.5
7.0
6.5
6.0
5.5
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
ppm
4.5.2 PPC-5
PPC-5 (10.1 mg) was isolated as yellow liquid. Its molecular structure was
characterized using spectral data and comparison with literature values.
-1
The IR spectrum (Figure 4.10) showed a broad band at 3455.24 cm indicating the
3
-1
clearly shown by the presence of strong C-H stretching (sp ) at 2957.67 cm . A strong
-1
-1
-1
-1
group. It is probably from a tertiary amine (R3N) since there is no N-H stretching
bands are observed in the spectrum. The IR characteristics bands are shown in Table
4.6.
Table 4.6
Wavenumber (cm )
Assignments
3455.24
O-H stretching
2957.67
-C-H sp stretching
1740.12
C=O stretching
1047.80
C-N group
PPC-5 was analyzed by UV-Vis spectroscopy (Figure 4.11) in the wavelength ranging
from 200 nm to 500 nm. Six absorbance peaks were obtained from the spectrum,
where the maximum length (max) were 435.50 nm, 316.00 nm, 302.00 nm, 245.00
nm, 233.50 nm and 216.00 nm respectively (Table 4.6). The solvent cut off point of
the CHCl3 solvent was max 245.00 nm. max 435.50 nm, 316.00 nm, 302.00 nm
indicated the to * transitions.
60
Wavelength (nm)
Absorbance
435.50
0.1616
316.00
0.2463
302.00
0.2675
The H NMR (Figure 4.12, 4.13 and Table 4.8) data of PPC-5 disclosed a methyl
triplet (J= 7.2 MHz) at 1.281, two proton siglet at 2.067 and 3.512. It also
13
afforded a methylene quartet (J= 7.2 MHz) at 4.143. The C NMR (Figure 4.14 and
Table 4.8) spectrum of PPC-5 exhibited signals for 6 carbon atoms. Two of which
were assigned to methyl (CH3) groups (14.20 ppm and 21.05 ppm) where the signal at
21.05 ppm most likely belongs to CH3 attached adjacent to the carbonyl (C=O) carbon
at 171.17 ppm. HMBC and HMQC spectra further supported this since there is
correlation between protons ( 4.143) attached to this carbon with carbonyl (171.17
ppm). One signal to a RCH2-N bonded carbon at 50.89 ppm, one to an oxygenated
carbon (60.41 ppm) and. At c 77.02 ppm, there is a triplet peak observed which
indicated CHCl3 solvent. Apart from that, there is a strong singlet at 77.22 ppm which
mostly represented RCH-O bonded carbon.
13
NMR signals at 14.20 ppm and 21.05 ppm showed HMBC (Figure 4.15 and Table
4.8) correlation to the C-3 (50.89 ppm) and confirmed the attachment position for the
1
methyl group. Further, another methyl group at 2.067 in the H NMR which
13
corresponded to the C NMR signal at 21.05 ppm showed HMBC correlations to the
C-3 (50.89 ppm) and C-5 (171.17 ppm) respectively and confirmed the attachment
position for the methyl group.
In addition, HMBC correlation H-4 and C-1 which corresponded to C-3 and C-5,
permitted assignment of the methylene group with the C-1 methyl group. The carbon
resonance associated with this group is found at 60.41 ppm in the HMQC spectrum
(Figure 4.16). The methyl group is coupled to an allyl group at 4.12 as evidenced by
the strong cross peak in the COSY (Figure 4.17) spectrum.
All the data were combined and the predictable structure of the compound was only
partially determined. It was due to insufficient data to predict the complete structure of
the isolated compound, PPC-5. The obtained data was insufficient because the
quantity of PPC-5 was very little. However, few fragments of the compound were
1
13
and COSY. Figure 4.9 shows the suggested fragments for PPC-5.
Table 4.8
13
C#
1H mult.,
13
HMBC
COSY
#H
1
14.20 (CH3)
1.26 t, 3H
21.05 (CH3)
2.07 s, 3H
50.89 (RCH2-N)
3.51 s, 2H
60.41 (CH2-O)
4.12 q, 2H
77.22 (RCH-O)
171.17 (C=O)
NR2
4
H H
COSY
Figure 4.9
H-1, H-2
H4, H1
H-2, H-4
1
H3C
H-4
2
CH3
HMBC
Suggested fragments from PPC-5
100.0
95
90
45 5.61
85
80
60 6.41
97 8.85 94 6.24
75
70
29 57.6 7
65
14 36.1 1
(C-H) sp
60
(C-H)
umbrella
55
64
63
%T
50
34 55.2 4
45
40
(O-H)
NR2
H
3
C
35
30
13 73.1 7
20
15
10
1
H3C
4 O
C
HH
10 47.8 0
(C-H)
umbrella
25
CH3
(C=O)
(C-N)
12 34.9 6
17 40.1 2
5
0.0
4000.0
3600
3200
2800
2400
2000
Figure 4.10
1800
1600
cm-1
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400.0
NR2
H
3
C
1
H3 C
4 O
HH
64
64
max = 302.00 nm
max = 316.00 nm
max = 435.50 nm
Figure 4.11
C
O
CH3
NR2
H
3
C
1
H3C
4 O
HH
CH3
64
65
Figure 4.12
NR2
3
C
1
H3C
3
4
CH3
C
HH
64
66
Figure 4.13
77.22
NR2
H
3
C
1
H3C
4 O
HH
CH3
64
67
1
3
Figure 4.14
13
2
4
C-1/H-4
NR2
H
3
C
3
1
H3C
64
68
C-4/H-4
4
HH
O
C
CH3
C-5/H-4
Figure 4.15
C-4/H-2
C-5/H-3
C-5/H-2
C-2/H-2
64
69
C-1/H-1
3
4
C-3/H-3
C-4/H-4
NR2
H
3
C
1
H3C
2
CH3
4
C
O
H H
Figure 4.16
43
1
2
64
70
3
4
NR2
H
3
C
1
H3 C
4 O
HH
Figure 4.17
CH3
4.5
Antimicrobial Test
The antimicrobial activity of methanol crude extract of Peperomia pellucida has been
screened using agar diffusion method. Eight bacteria were used for the test and the
bacteria were Klebsiella pneumonia (gram negative), Escherischia coli (gram
negative), Vibrio alginolyticus, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vibrio mimicus, Bacillus
cereus (gram positive), Micrococcus sp. (gram positive) and Streptococcus uberis
(gram positive) (Tshikalange et al., 2005; Krittika et al., 2007; Tan & Charles, 2011;
Govindappa et al, 2011). Table 4.9 shows antimicrobial result for MeOH crude extract
of Peperomia pellucida.
The crude extract has showed that it has different level of inhibition to Bacillus
cereus, Micrococcus sp. and Streptococcus uberis. MeOH crude extract of Peperomia
pellucida were inactive against Klebsiella pneumonia (gram negative), Escherischia
coli (gram negative), Vibrio alginolyticus, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vibrio mimicus.
71
Table 4.9
Bacteria
100
mg/ml
DMSO
Escherischia coli
Vibrio
alginolyticus
Vibrio
parahaemolyticus
Vibrio mimicus
Bacillus cereus
Micrococcus sp.
8
7
11
Klebsiella
pneumonia
Streptococcus
uberis
- = no inhibition
According to research by Lee et al., (2011), the growth of Escherischia coli was
inhibited at 3.125 mg/mL, Klebsiella sp. and Vibrio alginolyticus was controlled at
6.25 mg/mL and Vibrio parahaemolyticus was inhibited at 12.5 mg/mL by MeOH leaf
extract of Peperomia pellucida was found. By comparing the results with the present
study done, the previous study by Lee et al., (2011) found to have better antimicrobial
activity. It may be because the test was done on unfractioned methanol leaf extract of
Peperomia pellucida. Currently, there is no research done regarding antimicrobial
activity on MeOH crude extract with same extraction method.
4.6
Figure 4.18
4.7
Figure 4.19
4.8
Different colour produced when powdered air dried Peperomia pellucida plant was
mixed with different chemical reagents. Observation was done under ordinary white
light. Results are tabulated in Table 4.10. This observation contributes to the
identification of pharmacognostical and stardardization of the drug in the crude form
(Pulak, 2011).
Table 4.10
Sample
Powdered Plant
Powdered Plant + 50% HNO3
Powdered Plant + 1N HCl
Powdered Plant + 50% H2SO4
Powdered Plant + 10% FeCl3
Powdered Plant + Iodine
Powdered Plant + 5% KOH
Powdered Plant + MeOH
Colour Produced
Pale green
Orange
Light brown
Yellowish brown
Brownish green
Dark reddish brown
Brown
Brown
CHAPTER 5
CONCLUSION
Conclusion
Extraction was done based on solvent polarity extraction where three different
solvents were used. The solvents used for extraction were DCM, EtOAc and MeOH.
MeOH extract yield was only 10.48%.
Isolation and purification of chemical compounds were done using TLC and CC. TLC
profiling on MeOH extract was done to identify the presence of chemical compounds.
Then, DCVC was used for chemical compound isolation and six combined fractions
were obtained. The solvent system used to elude the fractions were CHCl3,
CH3COCH3 and MeOH by increasing gradient. Few potential fractions were selected
for further isolation and purification of pure chemical compounds. Five pure
compounds were isolated from MeOH crude extract of Peperomia pellucida.
Antimicrobial assay done MeOH crude extract showed that it has different level of
inhibition to Bacillus cereus, Micrococcus sp. and Streptococcus uberis bacteria. It
was inactive against Klebsiella pneumonia, Escherischia coli, Vibrio alginolyticus,
Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio mimicus bacteria.
Antioxidant assay showed that MeOH crude extract of Peperomia pellucida have IC50
which is 6.41 1.34 mg/ml compared to standard (quercetin) which has IC50 which is
1.67 0.06 mg/ml. While, MeOH crude extract have GAE value of 3.5 mg/g sample
based on total phenolic content assay done on it. Different colour produced when
powdered air dried Peperomia pellucida plant was mixed with different chemical
reagents and observation was done under ordinary white light.
5.2
Future Recommendations
1. Chlorophylls are removed first before further isolation and purification of
chemical compounds since Peperomia pellucida contains high level of
chlorophylls and presence of chlorophylls disables purification process.
2. Focus on essential oil extraction of Peperomia pellucida and main components
of Peperomia pellucida can be identified using GC/MS.
3. Focus on purification of active compounds based on antioxidant evaluation of
Peperomia pellucida extracts.
4. Bioassay such as antioxidant, antimicrobial and cytotoxicity assay must be
done on isolated pure compounds to determine its biological activity
properties.
77
REFERENCES
Abulude, F. O., Ogunkoya, M. O., & Akinjagunla, Y. S. 2010. Phytochemical
screening of leaves and stem of Cashew tree (Anacardium occidentate).
Electronic Journal of Environmental, Agricultural & Food Chemistry, 9(4), 815819.
Akinnibosun, H. A., Akinnibosun, F. I., & German, B. E. 2008. Antibacterial activity
of aqueous and ethanolic leaf extracts of Peperomia pellucida (L.) H. B. & K.
(Piperaceae) on three-gram negative bacteria isolates. Science World Journal,
3(4), 33-36.
Alam, K., Moizur, R. & Shariful, I. 2008. Antipyretic activity of Peperomia pellucida
leaves in rabbit. Turkey Journal Biology, 32, 37-41.
Alam, K., Moizur, R. & Shariful, I. 2008. Neuropharmacological effects of
Peperomia pellucida leaves in mice. DARU, 16(1), 35-40.
Alam, K., Moizur, R. & Shariful, I. 2010. Isolation and bioactivity of a xanthone
glycoside from Peperomia pellucida. Life Science and Medicine Research, 1, 14.
Arrigoni-Blank, M. d. F., Elena, G. D., Elaine, M. F., Angelo, R. A., Marcio, R. A. &
Murilo, M. 2004. Anti-inflammatory and analgesic activity of Peperomia
pellucida (L.) HBK (Piperaceae). Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 91, 215-218.
Arrigoni-Blank, M. F., Ricardo, L. B. O., Sandra, S. M., Paulo, d. A. S., Angelo, R.
A., Jeane, C. V., Socrates, C. d. H. C. & Arie, F. B. 2002. Seed germination,
phenology and antidermatogenic activity of Peperomia pellucida (L.) H. B. K.
BMC Pharmacology, 2(12), 1-8.
Aja, P. M., Okaka, A. N. C., Onu, P. N., Ibiam, U. & Urako, A. J. 2010
Phytochemical composition of Talinum triangulare (water leaf) leaves. Pakistan
Journal of Nutrition, 9(6), 527-530.
Ates, D. A., & Erdogrud, O. T. 2003. Antimicrobial activities of various medicinal
and commercial plant extracts. Turkey Journal Biology, 27, 157-162.
Aziba, P. I., Adedeji, A., Ekor, M. & Adeyemi, O. 2001. Analgesic activity of
Peperomia pellucida aerial parts in mice. Fitoterapia, 72, 57-58.
Ayoola, G. A., Coker, H. A. B., Adesegun, S. A., Adepoju-Bello, A. A., Obaweya, K.,
Ezennia, E. C. & Atangbayila, T. O. 2008. Phytochemical screening and
antioxidant activities of some selected medicinal plants used for malaria therapy
in South Western Nigeria. Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 7(3),
1019-1024.
Bayma, J. d. C., Mara, S. P. A., Adolfo, H. M., Alberto, C. A. & Williams, C. C.
2000. A dimeric ArC2 compound from Peperomia pellucida. Phytochemistry, 55,
779-782.
Chan, E. W. C., Lim, Y. Y., Wong, L. F., Lianto, F. S., Wong, S. K., Lim, K. K., Joe,
C. E. & Lim, T. Y. 2008. Antioxidant and tyrosinase inhibition properties of
leaves and rhizomes of ginger species. Food Chemistry, 109, 477-483.
Cera, G. M. D. P., Ramos, N. R. B. & Siazon, N. I. T. 2011. In vitro evaluation of
potential chemotherapeutic and chemopreventive biocompounds in P.pellucida
(L.) Kunth on HCT 116 cancer cell line. Journal of Pharmacology, 143.
Chen, I.-N., Chang, C.-C., Ng, C.-C., Wang, C.-Y., Shyu, Y.-T. & Chang, T.-L.
2008. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of Zingiberaceae plants in Taiwan.
Plant Foods Hum Nutrition, 63, 15-20.
De, S., Dey, Y. N. & Ghosh, A. K. 2010. Phytochemical investigation and
chromatographic evaluation of the different extracts of tuber of Amorphaphallus
paeoniifolius (Araceae). International Journal on Pharmaceutical and
Biomedical Research, 1(5), 150-157.
th
79
Govindappa, M., Sadanandda, T. S., Channabasava, R., Jeevita, M. K., Pooja, K. S. &
Vinay, B. R. 2011. Antimicrobial, antioxidant activity and phytochemical
screening of Tecoma stans (L.) Juss ex Kunth. Journal of Phytology, 3(3), 68-76.
Hatil, H. El-K. & Mohammed, Y. El-A. 2010. Antibacterial activity and
phytochemical screening of ethanolic extracts obtained from selected Sudanese
medicinal plants. Current Research Journal of Biological Sciences, 2(2), 143146.
Himal, P. C., Yogol, N. S., Sherchan, J., Anupa, K. C., Mansoor, S. & Thapa, P. 2008.
Phytochemical and antimicrobial evaluations of some medicinal plants of Nepal.
Kathmandu University Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology, 1(5),
49-54.
Houghton, P. J., & Raman, A. 1998. Laboratory handbook fractionation of natural
st
extracts. 1 Edition. Chapman & Hall.
Igbinosa, O. O., Igbinosa, E. O., & Aiyegoro, O. A. 2009. Antimicrobial activity and
phytochemical screening of stem bark extracts from Jatropha curcas (Linn).
African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 3(2), 58-62.
Joy, R. B., Donald, L. W., Craig, C. S., Kendra, L. K., Fulcher, R. G., Nancy, J. E.,
David, D. B. & Russell, F. B. 2008. Antimicrobial activity of native and
naturalized plants of Minnesota and Wisconsin. Journal of Medicinal Plants
Research, 2(5), 98-110.
Kai, M., Klaus, H. V., Sebastian, L., Ralf, H., Andreas, R. & Ulf-Peter, H. 2007.
Determination of DPPH radical oxidation caused by methanolic extracts of some
microalgal species by linear regression analysis of spectrophotometric
measurements. Sensors, 7, 2080-2095.
Karge, H. G. 2004. Molecular sieves. Weitkamp, J. Science and Technology.
Springer.
Khan M.R., & Omoloso, A.D. 2002. Antibacterial activity of Hygrophila stricta and
Peperomia pellucida. Fitoterapia, 73, 251-254.
Krittika, N., Natta, L. & Orapin, K. 2007. Antibacterial effect of five Zingiberaceae
essential oils. Molecules, 12, 2047-2060.
Kumaran, A. & Joel, K. R. Antioxidant and free scavenging activity of an aqueous
extract of Coleus aromaticus. Food Chemistry, 97, 109-114.
Lee S. W., Wee, W., Yong, F. S. J., & Syamsumir, D. F. 2011. Characterization of
anticancer, antimicrobial, antioxidant properties and chemical composition of
Peperomia pellucida leaf extract. Acta Medica Iranica, 49(10), 670-674.
Leland, J. C., Ara, K., Peter, B. K., Sara, L. W., James, A. D. & Harry, L. B. 2006.
nd
Natural products from plants. 2 Edition. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
APPENDIX A
Exp 1
Inhibition, %
Exp 2
Exp 3
Average
(mg/ml)
Standard
Deviation
0.00000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.15625
0.9725
0.9725
0.2363
0.7271
0.4251
0.31250
4.1860
4.1860
1.8061
3.3927
1.3741
0.62500
12.8281
13.0530
12.4967
12.7926
0.2798
1.25000
24.7250
24.5968
24.0449
24.4555
0.3614
2.50000
39.8056
42.1832
43.2021
41.7303
1.7429
5.00000
68.5990
67.9896
69.1337
68.5741
0.5724
79
Quercetin
Inhibition, %
Concentration
Exp 1
Exp 2
Exp 3
Average
(mg/ml)
Standard
Deviation
0.00000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.15625
30.0309
28.9150
29.2051
29.3837
0.5790
0.31250
56.7131
47.8680
51.2553
51.9455
4.4627
0.62500
82.5445
75.8505
77.5728
78.6559
3.4759
1.25000
87.0766
86.7901
83.9336
85.9334
1.7378
2.50000
87.1384
87.0281
86.0993
86.7553
0.5708
5.00000
87.2158
87.6777
86.4282
87.1072
0.6318
85
CURRICULUM VITAE
Name
Address
Phone Number
Email
Date of Birth
Place of Birth
Nationality
Race
Religion
Gender
Education
Awards
Others
: 2012
Secretariat of the Student Representative Council
2011
University Representative in Student Leadership
Convention 2011
2011
University Representative in UM Tamil Parliamentary
Style Debate
2010-2011
Fasilitator of 2010 and 2011 UMT New Students
Orientation Week
2010
Public Relation Exco of the Baratham Cultural Club
2010
Protocol Bureau of Appreciation Dinner Programme
by Baratham Cultural Club
2010
UMT Representative for 2010 MASUM Athletics
Tournament
2010
Committee Member for Annual Grand Meeting of
Sekretariat Rakan Integriti Mahasiswa UMT
2010/2011
2007
Participant of National Service Programme