Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Australian Hearing
The transition of services from the Australian Government
Hearing Services Program to the NDIS is scheduled to occur in
2019 - 2020. If a decision is taken to privatise Australian
Hearing before crucial issues are decided, then it removes the
opportunity to provide a safety net for highly vulnerable
community groups.
My responsibility here is to assess in a corporate way the best
possible future arrangement for Australian Hearing in a
changing market for services for this demographic.
on the most appropriate next steps. At some point we will reach a decision on the right
way forward but we have not reached that point just yet.
Senator Cormann: I am not responsible for the community service obligation of the
benefits provided to Australians with hearing impairment. These are matters that are the
responsibility of either the Minister for Health or the Minister for Social Services. My
responsibility here is to assess in a corporate way the best possible future arrangement for
Australian Hearing in a changing market for services for this demographic.
Senator Cormann: The final decision will be a cabinet decision because it is a decision
that will be made in the context of either a budget or a budget update.
Senator Cormann: I am not going to lock myself into an arbitrary timetable. Our
commitment is to get the decision right, and we feel that we need to do some more
thinking and potentially have some further conversations before making the best possible
decision.
OUR RESPONSE
Deafness Forum wrote to the Minister for Finance, Senator the Hon Mathias Cormann.
Dear Minister Cormann,
Deafness Forum of Australia, the peak consumer organisation representing the needs of
people with hearing loss, was consulted during the scoping study into the future ownership
options for Australian Hearing. You announced in May 2015 that the decision on the future
of the organisation would be deferred until later in 2015 while further consultation took
place. Those consultations have now been completed however there is other work that is
occurring in the hearing sector that needs to be finalised before the full impact on
Australian Hearing is known. Therefore Deafness Forum of Australia asks that you
reconsider the timing of the decision on the future of Australian Hearing until it is clear
whether the need for the safety net of a government hearing services provider is required.
The implementation of the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) impacts on existing
programs including the Australian Government Hearing Services Program. Some of the
client groups who receive services under this Program will transfer to the NDIS including
some highly vulnerable client groups that are currently the sole responsibility of Australian
Hearing. These groups are identified as Community Service Obligations (CSO) due to the
cost, complexity and access issues associated with the delivery of services to these clients,
and the lack of service options in the private sector. The CSO client groups include Deaf
and hard of hearing infants, children and young adults, pensioners and veterans with
complex hearing needs and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples aged over 50
years. The CSO Program also funds a culturally sensitive outreach service for Aboriginal
and Torres Strait Islander peoples in urban, rural and remote areas of Australia. Under the
NDIS, services to these client groups will become contestable.
The introduction of contestability introduces significant risk to access and service quality
and could have a detrimental effect on client outcomes for the following reasons:
Audiology is a self-regulating profession so there are few safeguards to protect
clients. There is also no certification system for clients to know whether the person
has appropriate knowledge and expertise to deliver services in highly specialised
fields such as paediatric audiology. This is currently managed by Australian Hearing
through an in house training and mentoring program.
There is currently a very streamlined approach to putting rehabilitation programs in
place for infants and children diagnosed with hearing loss which ensures less than
2% loss to follow up that will be lost with multiple providers
There will be a loss of independent, unbiased advice regarding clinical programs,
devices and educational program options for children with hearing loss as potential
providers in a contestable environment are likely to be aligned with particular
educational programs or hearing aid manufacturers
There is a high risk that people in rural and remote areas will experience reduced
access to services
There is a high risk that people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds
will find it difficult to access services
There is a high risk that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in urban, rural
and remote areas will lose access to a culturally sensitive service delivery model
The private sector has not been required to deliver hearing rehabilitation services to
infants and children in the past, so the ability and interest of the private sector to
provide these services is unknown. The move to contestability in the delivery of
services to children could result in market failure leaving children with hearing loss
and their families without the critical services they need
The client groups are very small so the fragmentation of these groups that will occur
with contestability will make it difficult for audiologists to maintain their skill levels
There is going to be a significant increase in the cost of delivering hearing services in
the commercial market as opposed to service provision in a Community Service
Obligations Program where the government provider achieves cost efficiencies
through its economies of scale and bulk purchasing arrangements
Deafness Forum of Australia has surveyed members and there was a very strong message
from the families of children with hearing loss that they would rather forego the choice of
provider in order to retain the high quality and trusted service they receive from Australian
Hearing.
Many of the issues outlined above could be resolved if Australian Hearing was nominated
as the sole provider of services to infants and children with hearing loss under the NDIS,
which we understand is possible under existing legislation governing the NDIS. This has
been suggested to the National Disability Insurance Agency during the transition planning
consultations but it is not yet clear whether they are considering this as an option. Also,
the future of other CSO client groups and activities that are currently the sole responsibility
of Australian Hearing but will not transfer to the NDIS, such as hearing assessment services
for children, is not yet known.
It is critical to resolve these matters before a decision is taken on the future of Australian
Hearing.
The transition of services from the Australian Government Hearing Services
Program to the NDIS is scheduled to occur in 2019 - 2020 to allow sufficient time to
address the number and complexity of the issues involved in the transfer of services. If a
decision is taken to privatise Australian Hearing before these issues are decided, then it
removes the opportunity to provide a safety net for highly vulnerable client groups. For
these reasons we ask that you defer the decision on the future of Australian Hearing until
these matters have been resolved.
Thank you for considering this request.
Deafness Forum of Australia, a member of the Disability Australia Consortium.
transcript
of
the
event
and
copies
of
presentations
are
available
at
http://www.acma.gov.au/theACMA/About/Events/Citizen-Conversations-Series/live-captioning-lets-talkregister?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Live+captioning+we+talked+and+listened&utm_content=Live
+captioning+we+talked+and+listened+CID_c2349af785ce4b6a968a754f2c1e0104&utm_source=SendEmailC
ampaigns&utm_term=transcript%20of%20the%20event%20and%20copies%20of%20presentations%20are
%20available
There is also a highlights video, which includes interviews with some attendees.
If you have any questions, please dont hesitate to contact captioning@acma.gov.au.
At left: Peter Moore, David Brady and Haydn Daw. At right, with Peter Cianchi.
Peter Moore from BHA Central Coast NSW and Peter Cianchi from BHA Canberra were the
joint winners of the BHA Illingworth Award for the most outstanding volunteer throughout
Australia.
The Better Hearing Consumer addresses the personal experience of living with hearing loss.
Editor Gael Hannan, and her occasional guest bloggers, explore every corner of the hearing
loss life with humor and poignancy at
http://hearinghealthmatters.org/betterhearingconsumer/
Gael wrote to One in Six: One of your members forwarded me the newsletter in which
you included one of my recent blogs (Ed: Articles on what NOT to say to deaf people have
been floating on Facebook, One in Six 14 October 2015). Thank you for the honour.
Several Australians have bought my recent book, The Way I Hear It, which is available
through Amazon or my publisher
http://www.friesenpress.com/bookstore/title/119734000015376639/Gael-Hannan-TheWay-I-Hear-It
Heres a review of the book in HuffingtonPost
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kristen-hansen-brakeman/humor-and-hearing-loss-a_b_8211434.html?fb_action_ids=10156287108175107&fb_action_types=og.likes&fb_sourc
e=other_multiline&action_object_map=%5B1117653081579892%5D&action_type_map=%
5B%22og.likes%22%5D&action_ref_map=%5B%5D
There are 360 million people worldwide who suffer disabling hearing loss. This is defined as
hearing loss of greater than 40 decibels in the better hearing ear.
When they divided the hearing impairment into mild, moderate and severe, they found that
those with moderate to severe hearing impairment had a 54% increased risk of death
whereas those with a mild hearing impairment had a 27% increased risk of death.
When they adjusted for demography and cardiovascular disease, there was still a 39%
increased risk of death in those with moderate to severe hearing impairment and a 21%
increased risk of death in those with mild hearing impairment.
There are now some important causal connections between hearing impairment and
cognitive, mental and physical function. There is already a known association with hearing
impairment and dementia, type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease.
If you feel that your hearing is being affected in any way you should be having audiometry
testing and consideration for hearing aids, which leads to much greater stimulation and
potentially therefore reduced levels of all of the aforementioned diseases. Once you are
more socially connected there is also more motivation to maintain good cardiovascular risk
modification, which does affect all the diseases that I have mentioned.
In summary, anyone with hearing impairment should have much earlier and regular
screening and much more vigorous management of their risk factors. More from Ross
Walker at Switzer Daily, http://m.switzer.com.au/the-experts/ross-walker/improve-yourhearing-and-improve-your-quality-of-life/
A change to the entitlement for smoke alarms is of concern to Deafness Forum. For an
individual to obtain a package, an audiologist must first confirm a profound or severe
hearing loss in the better ear.
This is significant change from the previous criteria and could mean that people who are
unable to hear a conventional smoke alarm are no longer able to obtain a specialised
smoke alarm package.
Smoke alarms usually emit a tone around 3kHz whether a person hears this will depend
upon their degree of hearing loss at the pitch of the alarm, how far they are from the
smoke alarm and even things like whether they sleep with a breathing assistance unit etc.
The study welcomes all English speaking participants with any type of hearing impairment.
As this study is based in WA, video link/skype/audio recording can be done for individuals
living in other states other than WA. For more information or to partake in the study
please do not hesitate to contact Jon Marginis (jonathan.marginis@postgrad.curtin.edu.au)
Hopefully, other organisations will follow, knowing that the outcome is more than positive.
While this remarkable achievement is an overwhelming success, it is the tip of the iceberg
in relation to other matters that effect people with a hearing loss he said.
During his comments to the group, Deafness Forum chairman David Brady spoke of the
importance of Hearing Loss becoming a national health priority - given the high incidence
of hearing loss, its predicted increase across all ages, the implications for health & wellbeing and the importance of addressing the isolation and social exclusion that is often
currently the lot of those with hearing loss.