Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 5

Why the BJP must stand up to fake protests - Rediff.

com India News

1 of 5

http://www.rediff.com/news/column/column-why-the-bjp-must-stand-up-...

HOME NEWS BUSINESS MOVIES SPORTS CRICKET GET AHEAD SHOPPING

rediff NewsApp

Search

SHOP FOR: Men's Lifestyle Women's Lifestyle Mobiles Electronics Watches Car Accessories Home & Decor Personal Care Books All Categories

Ashutosh Sachan | Sign out


Rediff.com News Why the BJP must stand up to fake protests

Why the BJP must stand up to fake protests


Share

Comment

To get such articles in your inbox


ashutoshsachan@rediffmail.comSubscribe
Text size: A A

November 05, 2015 21:01 IST

Latest from rediff.com


Big blow for SA:
Steyn unlikely to
take field on
Saturday

Tendulkar, Warne
ring the opening
bell at NYSE

'While the government must be relentless in its efforts to curb unruly elements to
ensure secular harmony and protect its goal of national development,it must not

Indian blockade
more inhuman
than war: Nepal
PM

lose the moral high ground by giving in to the antics of the anti-nationalist lobby.'
'They must be countered and relegated to the dustbin of history,' says Vivek
Gumaste.

OROP delay:
Ex-servicemen to
return medals
next week

ry as hard as I can to discern an iota of rationality, a whit of fair play and a speck of morality
in the welter of intolerance related protests rocking the nation, I fail miserably.
Instead the more I dissect the issue, the more I delve into its intricacies and antecedents the
more morally repugnant and logically untenable the whole jamboree appears.
The current campaign led by writers, academics and scientists is not a sincere altruistic
attempt to uphold the tenets of human dignity or safeguard their practice. It is a crass rampage
of ideological triumphalism that revels in ridiculous hyperbole (comparing the Rashtriya
Swayamsevak Sangh to Islamic State -- courtesy historian Irfan Habib), indulges in inordinate
hype, reeks of despicable double standards and smacks of unadulterated bigotry

Srinagar turns
fortress for PM's
visit; Separatists
under house
arrest

Manmohan's
advice for Modi:
'No free market
without freedom'

In the polemics of Indian literati, moral outrage is a selective and arbitrary expression defined
not by the degree of depravity but by the identity of the victim, the perpetrator and the
reigning government; it carries a distinct anti-Hindu, anti-Bharatiya Janata Party bias.

06-Nov-15 9:31 PM

Why the BJP must stand up to fake protests - Rediff.com India News

2 of 5

http://www.rediff.com/news/column/column-why-the-bjp-must-stand-up-...
Stats:
INTERESTING
numbers from
Mohali Test, Day
2

The muted response by a certain section of the Indian intelligentsia to the ethnic cleansing of
Hindus from Kashmir and the anti-Sikh pogrom of 1984 is a standing testimony to this
unabashed differential treatment. Perusal of recent events (listed below) lends further
credence to the continuance of this ingrained perfidy.
September 25, 2015: In Yavatmal, Maharashtra, a Hindu police constable, Amol Manohar

Ready to buy an
Apple Watch for
Rs 14 lakh?

Badukale standing duty outside a mosque is repeatedly stabbed by a Muslim, Abdul Malik
Razzak to the cry of 'Tumhari government beef ban karti hai, toh yeh lo (Your government
bans beef, so take this).' The national media fails to acknowledge this incident promptly; weeks
later a report surfaces (Indian Express, October 21).

REVEALED!
Secret to Ashwin's
consistent
performance...

October 9: Prashant Poojary, a 29-year-old flower vendor, involved in a campaign to close


illegal slaughter houses is brutally hacked to death by six Muslims in Moodbidri, Karnataka.
Again our media scribes fail to deliberately take note. Finally, on October 25 almost 16 days
later, the Indian Express runs a report branding the victim as a Bajrang Dal activist as if being
a Bajrang dal activist makes him fair prey for decimation.

After tormenting
SA batsmen,
Ashwin turns up
heat on media

September 28: In Dadri UP, a Muslim suspected of slaughtering a cow is set upon by a mob
and killed. All hell breaks loose instantaneously. The news makes the headline of each and
every newspaper, becomes the focus of heated television debates and writers line-up to return
their national awards. Till today the saga continues with selected scientists and film personnel
jumping on to this bandwagon of manufactured protest.
ll three incidents are acts of violent intolerance that are equally horrendous; the quantum
of injury is also similar: Two deaths and one near death. Logic and morality would dictate an

Stars spotted!

What's this?

Reader Sahana Chakravarty meets Shah


Rukh Khan!
Reader Sahana Chakravarty has sent us
a...

identical response, yet the reactions are varied: A shrill pandemonium bordering on hysteria in
the Dadri case versus a telling silence in the other two.

More stars spotted

Met a celebrity?
Email us photos & videos

I would hate to believe that the identity of the victim was the determinant; nevertheless it is
the only plausible explanation. Let us face it: Hindu victims are less likely to find sympathy in
the warped ideological narrative of this intellectual cabal.
Far more dangerous than a few isolated incidents of hyped up intolerance is what I call the rise
of intellectual dishonesty; a language that threatens to turn upside down the traditional
paradigm of right and wrong; right and wrong are no longer defined by impartial ethical
standards but by the slanted parameters of a twisted secularism in which the Hindu is always
the fall guy.
Can proponents of such inequitable values be our moral guardians? This charade must be
stopped in its tracks. We need to subscribe to a non-negotiable and universal concept of
propriety that is blind to the caste, colour or religion of the victims in order to ensure a truly
egalitarian democracy.
Neither can honest moral dissent be dampened by the specifics of the party in power. But our
writers beg to differ; their vitriol is reserved for a select few. In 2013 when Narendra
Dabholkar, the anti-superstition crusader, was shot dead in broad daylight in Pune,
Maharashtra, there was hardly a whimper of protest; not a single writer handed in their
awards. The reason: Sonia Gandhi's Congress was the ruling party both in the state and at the
center.
Taking victimisation to a new high, this ghastly murder is now being resurrected and clubbed
together with the M M Kalburgi case to give it a semblance of a series of atrocities to further
impugn the Narendra Modi government; an example of rank skullduggery that defies temporal
or logical validity.
There is no denying that the slaying of the Kannada scholar Kalburgi in Dharwad, Karnataka,
is a reprehensible act that warrants outright condemnation. However, with the criminal
investigation still in its infancy and no definite pointers, the liberal establishment's haste to
convict Hindu outfits (and the BJP government by proxy) via a media trial with the reversed
injunction that Hindu groups are always guilty unless proven innocent makes mockery of the

06-Nov-15 9:31 PM

Why the BJP must stand up to fake protests - Rediff.com India News

3 of 5

http://www.rediff.com/news/column/column-why-the-bjp-must-stand-up-...

basic rule of jurisprudence.

Titanium Magnetic Bracelet


Rs. 1,469 Rs. 449
Add to cart

Buy Puma Socks And Get MP3


Player Free

Fashion Founder Designer Set Of 3


Bhagalpuri Art Silk Printed Saree

Rs. 1,099 Rs. 399

Rs. 2,699 Rs. 999

Add to cart

Add to cart

lso please explain to me how the BJP government at the Centre is responsible for this
murder. As per the Indian Constitution, law and order is exclusively a state responsibility that
absolves the BJP of any direct responsibility bar a moral one for these atrocities. It is the
Congress state government that is culpable; likewise in the Dadri lynching it is the Samajawadi
Party that must be in the dock.
All these instances lead me to conclude that this anti-BJP protest is an ideologically driven
witch-hunt sans logic, sans morals and sans evidence; in other words rank bigotry. And this
bigotry was in full display when the journalist Rajdeep Sardesai questioned the veteran writer
Nayantara Sahagal (Nehru's niece, a Sahitya Akademi Award winner and a ring leader of the
'Crucify BJP project') about her ethical inconsistency. Without offering any reasons or factual
corroboration she tersely replied: 'Now there is a Hindutva government at the Centre.'
So we have it right from the horse's mouth. This government is being targeted for not what it
did or did not do, but because of the name that it has been branded with. If this is not bigotry,
then what is?
India is a vast diverse nation of 1.4 billion people with contrasting ethnicities who inhabit
638,000 villages, 5,100 towns and 380 cities and home to almost every religion in the world.
Therefore when viewed objectively and demographically bereft of ideological baggage, these
incidents though unfortunate and unjustifiable are tiny insignificant blips (that have neither
increased nor decreased) on an extensive canvas of moderation and lack the capacity to
adversely impact the broad narrative of a pluralistic modern India. The inference that
intolerance is on the rise is factually untenable.
hat irks Modi's detractors is his impeccable performance in his tenure so far. He has
stayed away from any controversies, focused on good governance, singularly strived to jump
start India's economy and has given much needed direction to a nation.
There have been no large scale riots or terrorist attacks; corruption is on the decline and
financial scams are a desiderata.
Therefore a perception of rising intolerance is being manufactured wherein normal aberrations
of society are being given a diabolical hue and exaggerated to paint them as harbingers of a
dangerous slide into extreme religious fanaticism.
Non-issues have been converted into ugly controversies by hyperbole and distortion; slips of
profanity uttered in the heat of an election campaign by low ranking no name functionaries
have been given front page billing and advertised as the norm of the party and die-hard
historical interpretations of miniscule fringe elements are being posited as the official party
line. In short, it is a campaign of unsubstantiated demonisation.
Moreover this protest is not an exercise in constructive engagement to affect a positive
outcome. The language of this protest is not dialogue; if it was, instead of sensational
resignations and hate filled invectives the writers would have reached out to the government.
The language of this protest is blackmail pure and simple; an arrogant diktat of a privileged
clique with an exaggerated sense of entitlement that subscribes to the motto: 'It's my way or
the highway.'

06-Nov-15 9:31 PM

Why the BJP must stand up to fake protests - Rediff.com India News

4 of 5

http://www.rediff.com/news/column/column-why-the-bjp-must-stand-up-...

o blinkered is this vendetta that even national interest is being sacrificed; the Digital India
project is being undermined and no stone is being left unturned to batter the government's
image to hamper the increasing foreign capital inflows. Such authoritarian and destructive
tendencies cannot be allowed to prevail.
Despite the hoopla the government has not been tardy in its response. On October 1, the
ministry of home affairs sought a report on the Dadri incident from the state government of
Uttar Pradesh and on October 5 issued the following statement: 'The home ministry today
issued an advisory to state governments stating that there is zero tolerance for any attempt to
weaken the secular fabric of the nation and exploiting religious emotions or sentiments. MHA
has called on the states to take strictest action as per law against such elements without any
exception whatsoever.'
The BJP has nothing to be apologetic about. The claim of intolerance is hyped and if any
intolerance does exist it cannot be attributed to the government. The wider nationalist
sentiment which has never advocated violence or intolerance cannot be bracketed with lumpen
fringe elements (who still remain the fringe and not the core) and any effort to do so must be
pushed back forcefully.
While the government must be relentless in its efforts to curb unruly elements to ensure
secular harmony and protect its goal of national development,it must not lose the moral high
ground by giving in to the antics of the anti-nationalist lobby. They must be countered and
relegated to the dustbin of history with facts and logic if India is to progress.
For too long have they gotten away with their malicious and disruptive shenanigans. It is time
to call their bluff, once and for all.
IMAGE: Filmmakers, from left Kirti Nakhwa, Harshavardhan Kulkarni, Nishta
Jain, Dibakar Banerjee, Anand Patwardhan at a press conference returning their
National Awards in protest against the government. Photograph: Mitesh Bhuvad
/PTI
Vivek Gumaste

Related News: BJP, Digital India, Dadri UP, Hindu, Indian Express

Share

Print this article

Comment

More from rediff


At 11, this 'chhota
masterji' teaches
slum kids

Why an ex-ISRO
chief wants a
BJP-led Third
Front

It's free!

To get such articles in your inbox

ashutoshsachan@rediffmail. SUBSCRIBE >

06-Nov-15 9:31 PM

Why the BJP must stand up to fake protests - Rediff.com India News

5 of 5

http://www.rediff.com/news/column/column-why-the-bjp-must-stand-up-...

Business email Office email App Domain registration Website Rediffmail Money Company email Online Shopping Books

Gifts

Videos

Blogs

Buzz

2015 Rediff.com - Investor Information - Advertise with us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy - Careers - Feedback - Terms of use

06-Nov-15 9:31 PM