Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Director
Llus Gil Espert
Departament
Resistncia de Materials i Estructures a l'Enginyeria (RMEE)
Febrer 2011
Resumen
La tesis parte de la necesidad de identificar los mtodos, materiales y tcnicas que
pueden contribuir al refuerzo de las estructuras de hormign armado. El uso de polimeros
reforzados con fibra (FRP) es una forma muy efectiva para reparar y reforzar las estructuras
que se han vuelto estructuralmente inseguras a lo largo de su vida. Los laminados de CFRP
son nuevos materiales compuestos de carbon que se conectan externamente a vigas de
hormign. Estos materiales de alta resistencia mejoran el comportamiento de flexin de las
vigas. El objetivo principal de la investigacin, que se describe en la tesis, es el anlisis del
comportamiento de la respuesta de vigas de hormign armado raforzado con laminados de
CFRP. Esto implic un estudio experimental que se llev a cabo en el Laboratorio para la
Innovacin Tcnica en Estructuras y Materiales (LITEM) del Departamento de Resistencia de
Materiales y Estructuras en Ingeniera de la Universidad Politcnica de Catalua. Durante los
experimentos, los siguientes aspectos fueron evaluados y registrados en relacin con la
respuesta de las vigas ensayadas: anlisis de carga-desplazamiento, el comportamiento de
deformacin, distribucin de la tensin, los perfiles de desplazamiento, los modos de falla y
los patrones de fisuracin. Para alcanzar estos objetivos, se utilizaron cinco vigas de hormign
armado con diferente configuracin de ensayos (una de control, dos vigas con un laminado de
CFRP y otras dos vigas con un par de laminados). Observaciones finales han confirmado la
eficacia del sistema de refuerzo compuesto. Tambin nos dimos cuenta de que los resultados
eran cercanos a los valores tericos, en la mayora de los aspectos.
Palabras clave:
Refuerzo; materiales compuestos; CFRP, laminados, comportamiento a la flexin,
vigas de hormign armado.
Page 2
Abstract
The thesis starts from the need to identify methods, materials and techniques that can
contribute to the strengthening of the reinforced concrete structures. Fiber reinforced polymer
(FRP) application is a very effective way to repair and strengthen structures that have become
structurally inefficient over their life span. CFRP laminates are new carbon-based composite
materials that attach externally to concrete beams. These high strength materials improve the
bending behavior of beams. The main objective of the research, described in the thesis, is the
analysis of the response behavior of retrofitted reinforced concrete beams with CFRP
laminates. This implied an experimental study, which took place in the Laboratory for
Technical Innovation in Structures and Materials (LITEM) of the Department of Strength of
Materials and Structural Engineering of the Polytechnic University of Catalonia. During the
the experiments, the following aspects were evaluated and recorded regarding the response of
the tested beams: load-displacement analysis, deformation behavior, stress distribution,
displacement profiles, failure modes and crack patterns. In order to attain these goals, we used
five reinforced concrete beams, differently prepared for the test (one control beam, two beams
with one CFRP laminate attached and another two beams with a pair of the same laminates).
Final observations have confirmed the efficiency of the composite strengthening system. Also
we noticed that the results were close to the theoretical values, in most of the aspects.
Keywords:
Strengthening; composite materials; CFRP; laminates; flexural behavior; reinforced
concrete beams.
Page 3
Acknowledgments
I would like to express my best regards to all the people involved in realizing this
project.
My most grateful appreciation goes to the director of my master thesis project, Prof.
Dr. Eng. Lluis Gil Espert for his knowledgeable insight and motivating words, and for the
idea of making this project come true.
I also feel so lucky to have had eng. Juan Jos Cruz as my co-advisor.
I would also like to thank Prof. Dr. Eng. Rodica Vierescu, for the professional
consulting.
Teachers, staff and fellow UPC Marco Antonio Prez, Ernest Bernard, Francesc
Puigvert, Snia Segura and Vincent Andreu for the attention given to me whenever I needed
help and their collaboration in the field of experimentation.
Laboratory for Technological Innovation in Structures and Materials (LITEM), to
UPC for putting at my disposal equipment and facilities to deal with all the experiments. I
would like to thank the BASF Chemical Company for supplying the research material.
To my family and my friends for their encouragement to go forward in some difficult
times.
To all of you, thank you!
Page 4
Index
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 9
1.1
Objectives .......................................................................................................................................... 10
1.2
Hypotheses ........................................................................................................................................ 10
1.3
1.4
Methodology ..................................................................................................................................... 12
1.5
2.2.
2.3.
Experimental studies regarding the FRP strengthening of existing structural members ..................... 32
3.2.
3.3.
Page 5
4.3.
4.4.
5.2.
5.3.
5.4.
5.5.
Conclusions...................................................................................................................................... 100
6.2.
REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................................104
ANNEX. TECHNICAL GLOSSARY ...............................................................................................110
Page 6
Index of figures
Page 7
Page 8
CHAPTER I
Introduction
Reinforced concrete structures often have to face modification and improvement of
their performance during their service life. The main contributing factors are change in their
use, new design standards, deterioration due to corrosion in the steel caused by exposure to an
aggressive environment and accident events such as earthquakes.
In such circumstances, there are two possible solutions: replacement or retrofitting.
Full structure replacement might have determinate disadvantages such as high costs for
material and labor, a stronger environmental impact and inconvenience due to interruption of
the function of the structure e.g. traffic problems. When possible, it is often better to repair or
upgrade the structure by retrofitting.
In the last decade, the development of strong epoxy glue has led to a technique, which
has great potential in the field of upgrading structures. Basically, the technique involves
attaching steel plates or fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) plates to the surface of the concrete.
The plates then act compositely with the concrete and help to carry the loads.
FRP can be convenient compared to steel for a number of reasons. These materials
have higher ultimate strength and lower density than steel. The installation is easier and
temporary support until the adhesive gains its strength is not required due to the low weight.
They can be formed on site into complicated shapes and can be easily cut to length on site.
This work is a study of the behavior of concrete beams retrofitted with carbon FRP
(CFRP)
.
Page 9
1.1 Objectives
The main objective of this thesis is the study of the behavior of reinforced concrete
beams strengthened with CFRP laminates. The overall aim of the paper is to investigate and
improve the understanding of the behavior of reinforced concrete beams retrofitted with
CFRP.
The specific objectives of this study are:
Load-displacement analysis
Deformation Behavior
Displacement analysis
The axiomatical idea behind the study is that retrofitting structural beams with FRP
materials will improve the overall behavior under flexural loading.
1.2 Hypotheses
We assume that:
The number of CFRP plates, attached to the tested beams, has a major
influence on the efficiency and final results of the response behavior.
Experimental results are close to values obtained in the design guides, and
other experimental works.
Page 10
The choice for the present subject of thesis was made taking into consideration three
reason categories: theoretical, practical and personal reasons.
Theoretical reason
I opted for this theme because of the increased need to strengthen concrete structures.
Various motivations lead to the increased demand for strengthening, Due to the aging of
infrastructure and the need for upgrading to meet more stringent design requirements,
structural repair and strengthening have received considerable emphasis over the past two
decades throughout the world.
At the same time, seismic retrofit has become at least equally important, especially in
earthquake-prone areas.
Practical reason
I chose this subject because, besides the well-recognized advantages that the FRP
strengthening systems possess, there are also some important doubts about using this system.
Bearing in mind that the FRPs are relatively new materials and not so widely used there is a
need to develop further the knowledge about the behavior of the retrofitted concrete members.
Another practical reason was the fact that this composite system is not sufficiently
verified in on real-size beams.
Other than this, the available standards and design codes have a dynamically evolution.
Their contents have been known to change also, because of new investigations.
In Romania, the initiatives regarding the study and development of FRP materials have
started later than in other countries this subject being really new and modern. Furthermore,
laboratory research experiments are made on small-scale models (specimens) because of the
financial costs required.
In our country, there is an important number of buildings that are in a very bad
structural condition (especially historical monuments) so there is the necessity of
strengthening their structure. This is why authorities started to focus on finding and using
alternative solutions to this specific problem.
Page 11
Personal reasons
I am interested about the composite materials theme. This domain necessitates
knowledge from a broad area. Because of my personalitys nature, I like to know the
phenomena that I study in a multidisciplinary context. I am fascinated on one hand about the
form (aspect) of an object and on the other about the contents and structure of it. This fact is
proved by the fact that I am also student in the final year at the University of Architecture
Ion Mincu Bucharest. I have obtained my bachelor degree in civil engineering at the
Technical University of Civil Engineering of Bucharest.
1.4 Methodology
For the current research, it was necessary to accomplish the following steps:
Discussions about the necessity and purpose of the project with the director of
the thesis. Arrangements about the place where the research will take place
(LITEM).
My project was done in accordance with the developing PhD. Thesis of Eng.
Juan Jos Cruz. Besides the necessary tests for my research I took part in other
experiments regarding his PhD. thesis subject.
Establishing the specific aims of the experimental study and the accompanying
methodology.
Choosing five beams for the required tests. One of the beams is used as a
control beam. Two will have one laminate attached, and the other two a pair of
CFRP laminates. These four beams had been preloaded 3 months before I
arrived.
Page 12
Designing the test setup. Specifying the different loading schemes for each
beam.
Acquiring the necessary research material (CFRP laminates, epoxy primer and
adhesives, strain gauges, etc.).
Preparing the surfaces and applying the epoxy primer on the specimens.
Cutting the necessary length and applying the CFRP laminates with epoxy
adhesive on the tension face of the four precracked beams. The resin is left to
cure for one week.
Preparing the test beams for instrumentation. Putting the strain gauges on the
top and bottom of the retrofitted beams.
Preparing the test setup (actuator and supports). Moving one beam at a time, on
the final position for testing. Putting the rest of the necessary sensors into
position.
Running the test and recording all the available data by means of sensors,
photos and cameras.
Page 13
This paper is organized in two distinct parts: a theoretical part and an experimental
part.
Chapter I presents the general aspects regarding this study: objectives, hypotheses,
motivation, methodology and the current title.
Part I is divided in two chapters:
Chapter II General aspects regarding FRP strengthening systems presents the
main reasons why the system appeared; concepts and definitions used in this field; a historical
background view regarding the use and developing of the FRP system; a short presentation on
the characteristics of the composite materials used.
Chapter III State of the art review highlights the present knowledge in the
strengthening with externally bonded FRPs. A discussion is made upon different experimental
programs carried away by different researchers using these systems, across the world. An
overview of the main design codes in this domain is made, together with some comparative
remarks. The last part of this chapter is occupied by a short presentation of a theoretical
analysis and design of a FRP strengthened RC member.
Part II has an experimental approach. It is divided into three chapters:
Chapter IV Experimental methodology comprises of the description of the
experimental work that has been done in the laboratory (design and testing of the specimens);
and description of the characteristics of the composite materials used in retrofitting the beams.
Special attention is drawn on the test setup and instrumentation of the specimens. Finally a
few words about processing the experimental data are being written.
Chapter V Results and discussions this chapter reflects the response behaviors of
the tested beams taking into account different variables. The beams results are being analyzed
on the next topics: load-deflection analysis, moment curvature relationship, interface stress
distribution, displacement analysis, failure modes and crack patterns. The results are being
treated both individually and together, in a comparative manner.
Chapter VI Conclusions and future lines of investigations the final chapter presents
a synthetic view of the experimental results. Some suggestions are being made about future
research issues.
References
Annex Technical glossary explains some of the technical words being used in the field of
FRP strengthening.
Page 14
PART I
Theoretical approach
Page 15
CHAPTER II
2.1.
Preliminary discussion
Page 16
Page 17
2.2.
Page 18
original design. For example, reinforcing bars may be omitted in a beam at the time of
construction due to a design or construction error. Although these two types of applications
are similar, there are important differences that are related primarily to evaluation of the
existing structural capacity and the nature of the repair to be undertaken before FRP can be
used. In many cases, a repair design will include strengthening to add a level of safety to the
repaired structure and to account for uncertainty in the retrofit design.
FRP retrofitting has been used successfully on reinforced concrete structures,
prestressed concrete structures, timber structures, and masonry and metal structures. At this
time, code design guidance is only available for FRP retrofitting of reinforced concrete
structures, particularly as applied to strengthening.
Two primary methods are used to attach FRP composite materials to concrete
structures (and to masonry, timber, and even metallic structures) for retrofitting purposes. One
method employs premanufactured rigid6 FRP strips that are adhesively bonded to the surface
of the structural member. The other method, known as hand layup, consists of in situ forming
of the FRP composite on the surface of the structural member using flexible dry fiber fabrics
or sheets and liquid polymers.
In recent years a new variant of the premanufactured strip method called near surface
mounting (NSM) has been developed. In this method, a thin, narrow FRP strip or smalldiameter round FRP bar is inserted and then bonded adhesively into a machined groove at the
surface of the concrete member.
Page 19
Page 20
Early work in the United States on FRP strengthening of concrete structures was
undertaken for the purpose of seismic retrofitting of reinforced concrete columns.
Simultaneously, a number of researchers in the United States studied flexural strengthening of
beams using hand-layup fiber sheets and fabrics of glass or carbon fibers (Saadamanesh,
1994).
More attention is paid to the applications from the 1990s, which were designed in a
routine fashion by structural engineers, as opposed to those from before the 1990s, which
were generally designed by engineers with a specialized knowledge of composites.
The state of the art of the early work, from 1980 to 1990, in the area of FRP
composites for reinforcing and retrofitting of concrete structures in the United States, Japan,
Canada, and Europe is detailed in collections of papers and reports edited by Iyer and Sen
(1991) and Nanni (1993b). In 1997, the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) founded
the Journal of Composites for Construction, which today is the main international archive for
reporting on research and development in the field of FRP materials for the AEC industry. In
2003, the International Institute for FRP in Construction (IIFC) was established in Hong Kong.
To date, thousands of research studies and structural engineering projects using FRP materials
have been reported worldwide. Reviews of developments in the field from 1990 to 2000 can
be found in ACI (1996), Hollaway and Head (2001), Teng et al. (2001), Bakis et al. (2002),
Hollaway (2003), Van Den Einde et al. (2003), and Tajlsten (2004).
2.3.
Page 21
Fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composites consist of high strength fibers embedded
in a matrix of polymer resin as shown in Figure 1. Fibers typically used in FRP are glass,
carbon and aramid. Typical values for properties of the fibers are given in Table 1. These
fibers are all linear elastic up to failure, with no significant yielding compared to steel. The
primary functions of the matrix in a composite are to transfer stress between the fibers, to
provide a barrier against the environment and to protect the surface of the fibers from
mechanical abrasion.
Table 1. Typical proprieties of fibers (Feldman 1989, Kim 1995).
Material
Elastic modulus
(GPa)
Tensile strength
(MPa)
Ultimate tensile
strain (%)
High strength
Ultra high strength
High modulus
Ultra high modulus
215-235
215-235
350-700
500-700
3500-4800
3500-6000
2100-2400
2100-2400
1.4-2.0
1.5-2.3
0.5-0.9
0.2-0.4
E
S
70
85-90
1900-3000
3500-4800
3.0-4.5
4.5-5.5
Low modulus
High modulus
70-80
115-130
3500-4100
3500-4000
4.3-5.0
2.5-3.5
Carbon
Glass
Aramid
The mechanical properties of composites are dependent on the fiber properties, matrix
properties, fiber-matrix bond properties, fiber amount and fiber orientation. A composite with
all fibers in one direction is designated as unidirectional. If the fibers are woven, or oriented
in many directions, the composite is bi- or multidirectional. Since it is mainly the fibers that
provide stiffness and strength composites are often anisotropic with high stiffness in the fiber
direction(s). In strengthening applications, unidirectional composites are predominantly used.
The approximate stiffness and strength of a unidirectional CFRP with a 65% volume fraction
of carbon fiber is given in Table 2. As a comparison the corresponding properties for steel are
also given.
Table 2.Typical proprieties of prefabricated FRP strips and comparison with steel (fib 2001).
Material
Prefabricated strips
Low modulus CFRP strips
High modulus CFRP strips
Mild steel
Elastic modulus
(GPa)
Ef
Tensile strength
(MPa)
ff
Ultimate tensile
strain (%)
fu
170
300
2800
1300
1.6
0.5
200
400
25
(yield strain = 0.2%)
Page 22
Page 23
Adhesives are used to attach the composites to other surfaces such as concrete. The
most common adhesives are acrylics, epoxies and urethanes. Epoxies provide high bond
strength with high temperature resistance, whereas acrylics provide moderate temperature
resistance with good strength and rapid curing. Several considerations are involved in
applying adhesives effectively. Careful surface preparation such as removing the cement paste,
grinding the surface by using a disc sander, removing the dust generated by surface grinding
using an air blower and carful curing are critical to bond performance.
Epoxy resins are a broad family of materials that provide better performance as
compared to other organic resins. Aerospace applications use epoxy resins almost exclusively,
except when high temperature performance is a key factor. Epoxies generally outperform
most other resin types in terms of mechanical properties and resistance to environmental
degradation. The primary advantages of epoxy resins include:
The high cost of epoxies, long cure time, and handling difficulties are the principal
disadvantages (Mallick, 1993).
Composites for structural strengthening are available today in the form of precured
strips or uncured sheets. Precured shells meant to strengthen columns are also available, but
are not treated further in this discussion. Precured strips are typically 0.51.5 mm thick and
50200 mm wide, and made of unidirectional fibers (carbon, glass, aramid) in an epoxy
matrix.
Uncured sheets typically have a nominal thickness of less than 1 mm, are made of
unidirectional or bidirectional fibers, often called fabrics, (in the latter case) that are either
preimpregnated or in situ impregnated with resin, and are highly conformable to the surface
onto which they are bonded. Bonding is typically achieved with high-performance epoxy
adhesives.
Historically, composites were first applied as flexural strengthening materials for RC
bridges Meier 1987; Rostasy 1987 and as confining reinforcement of RC columns Fardis
and Khalili 1981; Katsumata et al. 1987. Developments since the first research efforts in the
mid-1980s have been tremendous. The range of applications has expanded to include masonry
structures, timber, and even metals. The number of applications involving composites as
strengthening/repair or retrofit materials worldwide has grown from just a few 10 years ago to
several thousand today.
Page 24
Various types of structural elements have been strengthened, including beams, slabs,
columns, shear walls, joints, chimneys, vaults, domes, and trusses.
Figure 2. Uniaxial tension stress-strain diagrams for different unidirectional FRPs and steel. CFRP = carbon FRP, AFRP =
aramid FRP, GFRP = glass FRP (Source: fib 2001).
Figure 3 presents a simple cost comparison for the most common types of fiber
reinforcements. The prices are based upon continuous tows (rovings) of each fiber type. It
shows that E-glass is the most economical type of fiber available today. In addition, the figure
illustrates that higher modulus carbon fibers are the most expensive.
Figure 3. Relative ROM (rough order of magnitude) raw material costs (Source: Advanced Composites Inc. 2003)
Page 25
Figure 4 compares the tensile modulus (stiffness) of typical fibers with that of
traditional metals used in engineering applications. The bar chart shows that ultra-highmodulus (UHM) carbon fiber has a modulus three times that of steel and standard modulus
carbon fiber has a modulus twice that of aluminum.
Figure 4. Tensile modulus (stiffness) of typical fibers and metals (Source: Composite Tek, 2003).
Consider the tensile strength of common fiber reinforcements when compared to that
of titanium, steel, and aluminum. The tensile strength of the fibers considered here far exceed
that of aluminum by as much as 400%. For the most part, carbon, Kevlar, and fiberglass
also exceed the strength of steel by as much as two times. The specific strength of all of the
fibers surpasses that of the metals by as much as ten times. Carbon, Kevlar, and fiberglass
fibers offer superior strength at a lower weight when compared to metals
Figure 5. Tensile strength of typical fibers and metals (Source: Composite Tek, 2003).
Page 26
Most of the FRP systems used nowadays consist of carbon fibers embedded in epoxy
matrix. According to Meier (2005), the question regarding which type of fiber is most suitable
for this usage is still the subject of lengthy discussions. The author emphasizes that, for bridge
repair, carbon fiber is the material best suited in most cases, because the fiber is alkaline
resistant and does not suffer stress corrosion, two very important arguments for such
applications.
Actually, there are many reasons that make carbon fibers one of the most attractive
alternatives for poststrengthening concrete structures. Considering all reinforcing fiber
materials used to produce FRPs, the carbon fibers have the highest specific modulus and
specific strength that provide a great stiffness to the system, being an ideal choice to be
applied in structures sensitive to weight and deflection. Compared with steel, carbon fibers
can be five times lighter and present a tensile strength eight to 10 times higher.
Table 3. Comparison of characteristics of FRP sheet produced from different fibers (Meier, 1995)
Nonetheless, experimental data have indicated that, in many cases, the failure of the
strengthening layer is premature, which means that it is not possible to use all the
considerable load capacity offered by these high performance fibers. Several studies are being
developed to understand and prevent the mechanisms of premature failure. Despite this
eventual shortcoming, the effectiveness of FRP systems is still quite high, given the low
specific weight, ease of application, and good mechanical behavior. Therefore, the main
barrier to a wider use of this technique is the relatively high cost of the carbon fiberreinforced polymer CFRP systems. This is inhibiting their dissemination, especially in third
world countries, which have, in most cases, to import all the components of the system.
To overcome this problem, some researchers have suggested the use of alternative
fiber-matrix combinations, incorporating less costly but still high performance fibers. This
might become an attractive proposition for situations where strength and durability
requirements are not so strict. However, it is important to ensure that these new fiber-matrix
combinations have an appropriate mechanical behavior and good compatibility with other
building materials.
Glass fibers were chosen due to their good strength and lower cost, compared with
carbon and aramid fibers, which make them potentially feasible, both technically and
economically, for applications demanding a moderate increase in load capacity. In general,
Page 27
glass fibers are white in appearance and are characterized by a high strength (1,5003,500
MPa), moderate modulus of elasticity (6575 GPa), and density = 2.52.6 gcm3, and low
thermal conductivity (1 wmK for E-Glass).
Given the reduced stiffness, they might not present an adequate rigidity for some
poststrengthening applications, such as the reinforcement of structural members of airplanes
and bridges. Another problem is that low cost glass fibers, such as E-glass, are not alkaline
resistant and might suffer premature creep failures when subjected to high sustained stress
levels. Due to this problem, the document ACI 440.2R-02, of the American Concrete Institute,
suggests that design loads for glass fiber-reinforced polymers (GFRPs) are limited to 30% of
their ultimate strength. According to Wallenberger et al. 2005, despite these limitations, glass
fibers are among the most versatile industrial materials known today and are used in the
manufacture of several structural composites and in a wide range of special-purpose products.
Aramid fibers, on the other hand, are usually yellow in appearance, have low density
(1.41.5 gcm3) and are nonconductive. Mechanically, they present higher longitudinal tensile
strength (3,4004,100 MPa) when compared to other materials, such as glass fibers, and are
known for their toughness, impact, and abrasion resistance. Moreover, aramid fibers have
good resistance to chemical degradation and are relatively inert when exposed to most
solvents, although strong acids and bases may degrade them (Callister 2004). Aramid fibers,
however, are sensitive to degradation from exposure to ultraviolet radiation and are sensitive
to creep. Overall, the economical and mechanical performance of aramid fiber-reinforced
polymers (AFRPs) can be positioned between those of glass and carbon fibers.
The selection of the most adequate fiber to create an FRP system for a specific
application must be based on considerations regarding cost, stiffness, strength, and long-term
behavior. Depending on the fiber utilized, different performances may be achieved. In order
to provide reliable information for this kind of decision making, this research program
investigates and compares the structural performance of reinforced concrete beams
poststrengthened with carbon, aramid, and glass FRP systems.
Page 28
comparison is made below. However, FRP composite plate bonding should not be thought of
as simply an improved form of steel plate bonding. The new material offers such versatility
that new solutions will become practicable, particularly those arising from prestressing of the
plates.
The potential advantages of FRP composite plate bonding are as follows:
Weight of plates: the density of FRP composite plates is only 20% of the
density of steel. Thus composite plates may be less than 10% of the weight of
steel of the same ultimate strength. Apart from transport costs, the biggest
saving arising from this is during installation. Composite plates do not require
extensive jacking and support systems to move and hold in place. The
adhesives alone will support the plate until curing has taken place. In contrast,
fixing of steel plates constitutes a significant proportion of the works costs.
Transport of plates: the weight of plates is so low that a 20m long composite
plate may be carried on site by a single man. Some plates may also be bent into
a coil as small as 1.5 m diameter, and thus may be transported in a car or van
without the need for lorries or subsequent cranage facilities. The flexibility of
plates enables strengthening schemes to be completed within confined spaces.
Versatile design of systems: steel plates are limited in length by their weight
and handling difficulties. Welding in situ is not possible, because of damage to
adhesives, and expensive fixing of lap plates is therefore required. In contrast,
composite plates are of unlimited length, may be fixed in layers to suit
strengthening requirements, and are so thin that fixing in two directions may be
accommodated by varying the adhesive thickness.
Easy and reliable surface preparation: steel plates require preparation by grit
blasting, followed by careful protection until shortly before installation. In
contrast, the ROBUST project has demonstrated that composite plates may be
produced with a peel-ply protective layer that may be easily stripped off just
before the adhesive is applied.
Reduced mechanical fixing: composite plates are much thinner than steel plates
of equivalent capacity. This reduces peeling effects at the ends of the plates
and thus reduces the likelihood of a need for end fixing. The overall depth of
Page 29
Improved fire resistance: composite plates are a low conductor of heat when
compared with steel, thus reducing the effect fire has on the underlying
adhesives. The composite itself chars rather than burns and the system thus
remains effective for a much longer period than steel plate bonding.
Cost of plates: fiber reinforced composite plates are more expensive than steel
plates of the equivalent load capacity. However, the difference between the two
Page 30
Page 31
CHAPTER III
3.1.
Page 32
initially performed on RC beams 2000 mm (Meier, 1987; Kaiser, 1989) or 7000mm (Ladner
et al., 1990) in length. Strengthening was achieved through the use of pultruded carbon
fiber/epoxy laminates up to 1.0 mm thick bonded with the same epoxy adhesives used in
earlier steel plating work (Ladner and Weder, 1981). For the 2000mm length beams, the
ultimate load was almost doubled over the unplated control beam, although these beams were
designed with a low proportion of internal steel, and hence the strength of the unplated beam
was low.
In the case of the 7000 mm length beam, strengthened with a 1.0mm CFRP laminate,
the increase in the ultimate load was about 22% (Ladner and Holtgreve, 1989). However, for
both beam lengths the ultimate deflection was considerably reduced, although it was claimed
that there was still sufficient rotation to predict impending failure.
The following modes were observed either individually or in combination in the tests
carried out at the EMPA:
The CFRP plate was found to reduce the total width of cracks and produce a more
even crack distribution over the length of the beam (Meier and Kaiser, 1991). Meier et al.
(1992) recommended that in strengthening applications, the external CFRP should fail in
tension after yielding the internal steel but before failure of the concrete in the compressive
zone, since this would ensure a more ductile failure mode.
Research has demonstrated that the addition of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP)
laminate to reinforced concrete beams can increase stiffness and maximum load of the beams.
In a study by Toutanj et al. [1] beams retrofitted with CFRP laminates showed an increased
maximum load up to 170 % as compared to control beams. Another study by Kachlakev and
McCurry [2] shows an increase of 150 % when beams were strengthened in both flexure and
shear with CFRP and glass FRP laminates respectively. Other studies have also been
conducted by David et al. [3], Shahawy et al. [4], Khalifa and Nanni [5], Shehata et al. [6],
Khalifa et al. [7] in an attempt to quantify the flexural and shear strengthening enhancements
offered by the externally bonded CFRP laminates. Ferreira et al. [8] showed that when a beam
Page 33
is strengthened with CFRP sheets the stiffness increase and the tension cracking is delayed to
higher loads, and Karunasena et al. [9] showed that an externally bonded composite, of either
CFRP or GFRP materials, improved the moment capacity of deteriorated concrete beams.
FRP used to increase the flexural strength by attaching unidirectional sheets at the
extreme tension surface. Although strength increases up to 160% have been reported in the
literature (Meier and Kaiser, 1991; Ritchie et al., 1991), ductility and serviceability
constraints limit the percentage increase to about 40%. Typical loaddeflection responses of
control and strengthened beams are shown in Figure 6.
Figure 6. Load versus deflection curves for both control and strengthened beams.
It can be seen in the figure that FRP increases both the maximum load and the stiffness,
and there is a noticeable reduction in deflection at failure. In most cases, beams strengthened
with organic polymers fail by delamination of the FRP plate. In certain cases, failure occurs
due to tension failure of the concrete cover. When this happens, the delamination occurs at the
original reinforcement (bar) level as shown in Figure 7. These failure modes limit the number
of layers (or the area of FRP) that can be applied and, hence, the strength increases.
Additional information regarding the failure modes and discussion on strength increases can
be found in the literature (Arduini and Nanni, 1997; Nakamura et al., 1996; Ross et al., 1999;
Saadatmanesh and Ehsani, 1991; Sharif et al., 1994).
Page 34
Figure 7. Delamination of the reinforcement level (Source: ACI Committee 440, 2002).
As with steel plates, the beams which had been precracked before bonding had an
equivalent performance to the other test beams, indicating the effectiveness of the plate
bonding technique for repair. The load/deflection behavior was similar for all different plate
configurations, except for those with laminates bonded to the full length of the beam, clamped
by the reaction at the supports, which resulted in an increase in strength over the other plated
beams. It was concluded that for these particular beams and plates the ultimate loading
capacity of the system appeared to have been reached, being governed by the shear capacity
of the concrete beams.
The most comprehensive study of an FRP strengthening system was undertaken in the
United Kingdom during the ROBUST project (Hollaway and Leeming 1999) in which all
aspects of materials, design, and analysis were addressed. The substance of this paper formed
part of the ROBUST Project.
The tests at Oxford Brookes University continued (Hutchinson and Rahimi, 1996),
under the ROBUST programme of research, by utilizing both glass and carbon fiber/epoxy
laminates of different thicknesses built up from prepreg tapes. Three internal steel
reinforcement ratios were examined. All beams with external reinforcement performed
significantly better than their unplated counterparts in terms of stiffness and strength. The use
of GFRP was found to provide significant ductility and reasonable strength, whilst
enhancements were greater with CFRP but at the expense of a loss of ductility. Greater
enhancements were achieved with lower steel ratios.
Garden et al. (1996) showed that the ultimate capacity of the CFRP beams falls with
reducing the widththickness b/t and beam shear span/depth ratios. Failure under low shear
span/beam depth ratios is associated with high plate strains (the value being in the region of
70% of the plate ultimate strain) and relatively high longitudinal shear stresses at the
adhesive/concrete interface, and although the concrete failed in the cover concrete area,
debonding from the concrete was not observed.
Page 35
Plate end anchorage delays failure by resisting plate separation but does not increase
stiffness until the internal reinforcement has yielded.
He et al. (1997a), at the University of Sheffield, used steel and CFRP plates with the
same axial stiffness-to-strength precracked reinforced concrete beams in which a new, but
unspecified, plate anchorage system was adopted. The basic improvement in structural
performance due to plating was verified and it was found that the CFRP plates produced a
greater improvement in ultimate load than the steel plates. The authors (He et al., 1997b)
noted that the high stress and strain potential of the CFRP will not be utilized unless the plate
is prestressed.
Bencardino et al. (1997) tested CFRP plated beams at the University of Calabria, Italy,
recording reductions in member ductility due to plating without end anchorage; the ductility
was restored when anchorage was fitted in the form of externally bonded U-shaped steel
stirrups. The method of CFRP plating was used successfully to strengthen an experimental
portal structure.
A limited programme of experimental testing has been carried out at the University of
Bologna (Arduini et al., 1994; Arduini et al., 1995) in which small scale steel fiber reinforced
concrete specimens of length 500mm or 600mm have been tested in three point bending after
being strengthened with unidirectional aramid fiber/epoxy or glass fiber/epoxy composites of
thickness between 2.05.0 mm. These small scale tests were used to demonstrate that the
load-carrying capacity of the basic unplated beam could be increased through external plating
with FRC but that different failure modes, often brittle, were involved. It was noted that
peeling and shear cracks at the plate ends were responsible for causing premature, brittle
failure.
The use of thicker FRC plates was found to increase the occurrence of peeling failure.
Ductility was increased and peeling failure delayed through the use of plates bonded to the
sides of the beams in the plate end regions; the effects were enhanced by coupling the side
and soffit plates together, in which case failure was observed to occur by diagonal shearing at
the highest attained loads.
Many research studies investigating the performance of concrete structures with
bonded external composite materials have ignored the problems associated with adhesion
aspects and appropriate surface treatments for adhesive bonding. The optimum properties of
adhesives required for plate bonding applications is not known, but recommendations by
Mays and Hutchinson (1988) are generally followed.
There is also a lack of understanding of the requirements of FRP materials for plate
bonding applications. The application of externally bonded carbon fiber-reinforced polymer
(CFRP) strips for the flexural strengthening of reinforced concrete beams is known to delay
the cracking moment and mitigate the development of cracks (FIB 2001; ACI 2002; Neubauer
and Rostsy 2001; Kotynia 1999). Experimental tests have indicated that debonding of the
Page 36
bottom strip from the concrete surface is the most common mode of failure for concrete
beams strengthened in this manner. This type of failure generally limits the strength
utilization ratio of the strip; i.e., the ratio of the strain in the FRP at failure to its ultimate
strain (Kotynia 2000; Kaminska and Kotynia 2000). Due to FRP debonding failures, the
strength utilization ratios were sometimes only 1535%, depending on the cause of debonding
(Brena et al. 2003). The debonding mechanism results in the loss of the composite action
between the concrete and FRP laminates. The local debonding initiates when high interfacial
shear and normal stresses exceed the concrete strength.
Depending on the starting point of the debonding process, the debonding modes can be
classified into two main categories (Oehlers 1992; Smith and Teng 2002a,b). The first mode
of failure occurs in the anchorage zone and is known as plate-end debonding or concrete
cover separation, while the second mode of failure occurs in the flexural shear or flexural
vicinity, and is referred to as intermediate flexural shear crack-induced debonding or
intermediate flexural crack-induced debonding.
In the work of Kaminska and Kotynia (2000), the above two debonding modes of
failure were observed. For the plate-end debonding, premature failure is due to concrete cover
separation initiated after the formation of a main crack at the plat end. The crack propagated
vertically to the tension reinforcement level, and then progressed along the steel
reinforcement until the CFRP separated. The intermediate crack debonding failure initiated in
the pure bending region close to the vertical crack, and then propagated towards one of the
supports. The maximum CFRP strains recorded at debonding failure ranged from 0.6 to 0.7%
(Kotynia and Kaminska 2003).
In order to delay the CFRP debonding, as well as to increase the efficiency of the
CFRP strip, additional U-jacket strips or sheets located in the debonding initiation region have
been proposed (Chicoine 1997; Ritchie et al. 1991; Brena et al. 2003; Brena and Macri 2004;
Kotynia 2005). Using plate-end anchorage systems can mitigate plate debonding by providing
vertical restraints against the peeling-off stresses (Brena and Macri 2004). Similar additional
systems can be used not only at the plate end, but also along the midspan FRP laminate to
delay intermediate crack debonding (Spadea et al. 1998; Brena and Macri 2004).
Flexural strengthening of RC elements using composites may be provided by epoxy
bonding the materials to portions of the elements in tension, with fibers parallel to the
principal stress direction. Well-established strengthening procedures for RC structures may be
followed, provided that special attention is paid to issues related to the linear-elastic nature of
FRP materials and the bond between the concrete and FRP.
Many studies have been carried out to analyze the various failure modes of FRP
strengthened concrete beams. ACI 440 (2002) and fib Bulletin 14 (2001) have categorized the
failure of a FRPstrengthened RC beam into two broad categories: Where the full composite
action of the beam is developed, and where the premature debonding occurs. These are further
classified into six different modes of failure.
Page 37
The failure mode where full composite action is developed includes: (1) flexural
failure with yielding of steel followed by rupture of FRP; and (2) crushing of compressive
concrete before yielding of tensile steel or yielding of tensile steel followed by concrete
crushing, with undamaged FRP. On the other hand, premature debonding leads to loss in
composite action between concrete and FRP and prevents the strengthened beam from
reaching its ultimate flexure capacity.
This is undesirable, as the beam undergoes no yielding before a brittle rupture. This
category includes the following: Concrete-cover separation, which is the most commonly
reported mode of failure (Smith and Teng 2002a; Saadatmanesh and Malek 1998; Teng et al.
2003; Ritchie et al. 1991; Nguyen et al. 2001; Tumialan et al. 1999; Buyukozturk and Hearing
1998; Pham and Al-Mahaidi 2004a). This failure is popularly described by a crack formed in
the concrete at or near the FRP plate end, propagating to the level of tension reinforcement
and then progressing horizontally, along the level of the reinforcement, resulting in separation
of the concrete cover (Garden and Hollaway 1998). Plate end interfacial debonding, where
failure occurs in the concrete layer adjacent to the concrete-to-adhesive interface. Plate end
interfacial debonding is generally believed to be a result of high interfacial shear and normal
stresses near the plate end that exceeds the strength of the weakest element, usually concrete
(Smith and Teng 2002a).
Intermediate crack-induced interfacial debonding, where failure is induced due to
propagation of a flexural crack in the concrete parallel to the bonded plate and adjacent to the
adhesive-toconcrete interface, starting from the critically stressed portions toward one of the
ends of the plate (Bizindavyi and Neale 1999). Concrete shear failure, though this is not a
debonding failure in strict terms, but is categorized here only because the full composite
action between FRP and concrete is not developed.
Thus, for clarity the premature debonding is classified as fiber delamination initiating
at the plate end; and fiber delamination initiating at the mid-span of the strengthened beam.
Also, the groups are further classified based on the method of bonding the FRP sheet/plate to
the beam wet lay-up beams; and pultruded plated beams. The results of this study are
presented based on these classifications.
The tensile force resisted by the composite plate is transferred to the beam by
interfacial shear. When this shear stress exceeds the shear strength of the interface, debonding
occurs. As mentioned earlier, this failure occurs in the concrete just above the adhesive.
Typical shear strength of concrete is high enough to transfer composite forces. However, as
the beam bends, microcracks occur in the concrete just above the adhesive (epoxy) to
compensate for the strains in the composite. Note that tensile strain capacity of concrete is
only about 0.00025, and the composite sheets can sustain more than 0.015. Most epoxies used
for adhesive can also sustain large strains and do not crack. Hence, a layer of concrete with
microcracks becomes very susceptible for interlaminar shear failure. Theories are being
Page 38
developed for the prediction of this important failure mechanism (Arduini et al., 1997; Kurtz,
2000; Malek et al., 1998).
In addition to delamination due to shear failure, peeling can occur at the termination
point of the plate due to highly concentrated peeling stresses. Even though the mechanism can
be predicted with reasonable accuracy, it is recommended to use a lower strain for the
composite at failure rather than go through extensive analysis.
3.2.
Due to the importance of controlling risk in matters of public safety, standards and
codes for FRP materials used in civil structures have been in development since the 1980s.
FRP materials warrant separate treatment in standards and codes on account of their lower
modulus and ductility in comparison with conventional materials such as metals. Without
standards and codes, it is unlikely that FRP materials could make inroads beyond limited
research and demonstration projects.
Standardized test methods and material identification schemes minimize uncertainty in
the performance and specification of FRP materials. Codes allow structures containing FRP
materials to be designed, built, and operated with safety and confidence. This section
describes chronologically the standard and code development activities in Japan, Canada, the
United States, and Europe. The main accomplishments of these activities, to date, pertain to
the use of FRP materials for the reinforcement of new structures and for the repair and retrofit
of existing structures.
3.2.1. Japan
Efforts to prescribe specifications for the design and construction of concrete
structures with FRP reinforcements started in Japan in the 1980s. Examples of specifications
for internal reinforcements completed by the middle of the 1990s are as follows:
1) Recommendation for Design and Construction of Concrete Structures Using
Continuous Fiber Reinforcing Materials.
2) Guideline for Structural Design of FRP-Reinforced Concrete Buildings in Japan.
3) Design Methods for Prestressed FRP-Reinforced Concrete Building Structures.
Item 1, referred to here as the recommendation, was published by the Japan Society of
Civil Engineers (JSCE) in 1997, and is intended for concrete structures other than buildings
Page 39
(Machida 1997b). The recommendation includes quality specifications and test methods for
FRP materials, as well as recommendations for design and construction with FRP materials.
The quality specifications for FRP reinforcements define the required characteristics
and properties of the reinforcements, and serve to guide the development of new
reinforcements for practical applications. Reinforcement characteristics addressed include
fiber type and reinforcement configuration. Specified properties include the volume ratio of
axial fibers, reinforcement cross-sectional area, guaranteed tensile strength, tensile modulus,
elongation, creep rupture strength, relaxation rate, and durability, among others. Most of the
specified properties are determined based on tests described in the recommendation. Further
details are also given by Uomoto et al. (1997).
The design and construction recommendations in item 1 above are based on the JSCE
Standard Specification for Design and Construction of Concrete Structures, which is for
concrete structures in general (JSCE 1986a,b). The recommendations for construction in item
1 deal with issues such as FRP constituent materials, FRP storage and handling, assembly and
placement of FRP reinforcements, precautions in concrete placing and tendon jacking, and
quality control.
Some details covered in the recommendation have also been presented elsewhere in
the literature (Machida et al. 1995; Machida 1997a; Tsuji et al. 1997).
Items 2 and 3 listed above are intended for building structures. These specifications
were developed in 1993 as the final output of the research and development project,
Effective Utilization of Advanced Composite on Construction, sponsored by the Ministry
of Construction of the Japanese government. Item 2 adopts a limit statebased design method
with specific provisions somewhat different from those of item 1. Details can be found in the
English-language publications by Sonobe et al. (1995, 1997).
After the Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake in 1995, the use of externally bonded carbon
fiber sheets for seismic retrofitting of RC piers and columns greatly increased in Japan. Prior
to this time, the use had been mainly for repair. Aramid fiber sheets for retrofit and repair
were also developed at this time.
Standard test methods have been developed for FRP sheets by the Japan Concrete
Institute (1998). The methods include a test for tensile properties of FRP sheets and a test for
bond strength.
3.2.2. Canada
The use of FRP for civil engineering applications in Canada began in earnest in the
late 1980s when the Canadian Society for Civil Engineers created a Technical Committee on
the Use of Advanced Composite Materials in Bridges and Structures. Efforts of the committee
Page 40
were supported by the Canadian federal government, and led to the establishment of the
Network on Advanced Composite Materials in Bridges and Structures in 1992.
The network sponsored several missions in Japan, Europe, and the United States, and
documented the findings in state-of-the-art reports in this field (Mufti et al. 1991a,b). In 1995,
the Canadian federal government established the Network of Centers of Excellence on
Intelligent Sensing for Innovative Structures. One area of focus of ISIS is the use of FRP
materials for new structures and the rehabilitation of existing structures. ISIS published
several design guidelines on externally bonded and internal FRP reinforcements, participated
in several Code and Standards committees, and sponsored several national and international
conferences.
In the year 2000, Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code section 16, Fiber
Reinforced Concrete, was completed (CSA 2000). The Canadian Standards Association also
approved the code, Design and Construction of Building Components with FRP in 2002
(CSA 2002).
3.2.4. Europe
Research on the use of FRP began in Europe in the 1960s. A Pan-European
collaborative research program (EUROCRETE) was established in 1993 and ended in 1997.
The program was aimed at developing FRP reinforcement for concrete, and included partners
from the United Kingdom, Switzerland, France, Norway, and The Netherlands.
The International Federation for Structural (fib) 2001 Task Group 9.3, FRP
Reinforcement for Concrete Structures, was convened in 1993 with an aim to establish
Page 41
design guidelines following the format of the Comite Euro International du Beton
Federation International de la Precontrainte (Model Code and Eurocode 2).
Task Group 9.3 is divided into subgroups on material testing and characterization, RC,
prestressed concrete, externally bonded reinforcement, and marketing and applications. The
task group consists of members representing most European universities, research institutes,
and companies involved with FRP reinforcements for concrete. Membership includes
representatives from Canada, Japan, and the United States. The task group has completed the
development of an FIB bulletin on design guidelines for externally bonded FRP reinforcement
for reinforced concrete structures (FIB 2001).
In the United Kingdom, the Institution of Structural Engineers has published an
interim guide on the design of RC structures with FRP reinforcement (Institution 1999).
Prestressing and externally bonded reinforcements are not addressed in the guide. The guide
is closely based on and refers to related British design codes (British 1985, 1990, 1997). The
approaches adopted are similar to those under development in Japan, Canada, and the United
States.
In the last decade a lot of research efforts have been carried out for understanding the
behavior of reinforced concrete beams strengthened by externally bonded FRP. The key
subject of these studies is the mechanical characterization of the FRP-to-concrete adhesive
interface. Different contributions about this topic have been summarized and compared by
Chen & Teng (2001).
Roberts (1988) provided a simplified model for evaluating interface stresses in FRP
(or even steel) strengthened beams; simplified equations for evaluating shear and normal
stresses throughout the FRP-to-concrete interface have been provided by assuming linear
elastic behavior of the adhesive interface. Moreover, Saadatmanesh et al. (1998) provided
similar relationships even obtained under simplified hypotheses for the interface behavior;
both experimental and numerical comparisons pointed out that applying simplified analytical
formulae results in a close approximation of the complex stress pattern developing throughout
the interface.
After these studies and various relevant field applications, strengthening RC beams by
Externally Bonded FRP laminates is getting more and more common and the following Code
Provisions have been issued in various countries:
fib bulletin 14 (2001) in Europe;
ACI 440 (2008) in the United States;
JSCE Recommendations (2001) in Japan.
One of the most important problems to be faced when managing FRP strengthened
beams deals with the possible premature failure due to debonding between the FRP laminate
Page 42
and concrete. Indeed, that is one of the most widely studied phenomena in the scientific
literature dealing with FRP strengthening of RC members, both under the experimental and
theoretical standpoint (Faella et al., 2002). Codes of practice take the main conclusions of
such studies to provide different recommendations for checking bond effectiveness under both
serviceability and ultimate limit state.
Before going in depth about the different methodologies provided by the various codes
for checking the safety of the FRP strengthened RC members, it is important to emphasize
that the experimental evidence demonstrates that additional failure modes can be observed for
a FRP strengthened RC beam with respect to the usual RC members in flexure. For example,
JSCE Recommendations (2001) introduce the following failure modes for the Ultimate Limit
State:
concrete crushing;
The first two modes deals with the flexural strength of the strengthened section and
can be checked by considering the usual hypotheses for the section behavior, mainly
consisting in assuming that plane sections remain plane after beam deformation: strain offset
can be assumed for scaling the FRP strain with respect to the one of the beam suffit due to
initial strain generally present in beam before strengthening (fib bulletin 14, 2001).
On the contrary, the last three failure modes depends on the presence of the FRP as a
strengthening element. Indeed, the last one consisting in FRP tearing is quite unlikely to occur,
especially for carbon fibers, due to the significant strength of fibers. Premature failure due to
loss of bonding is much more usual to occur instead of FRP rupture. For this reason the third
and the fourth failure modes have to be checked as ultimate limit states forFRPstrengthened
beams; the three codes listed in the introductory chapter suggest different methodologies for
checking this ULS condition.
Finally, it is interesting to underline that the presence of the externally bonded FRP
strengthening results in further checks even for at the Serviceability Limit State. However,
only the European document (fib bulletin 14, 2001) provides an explicit check for interface
stresses with the aim of controlling the long term damage.
Page 43
Page 44
3.3.
There is a perfect bond between composite (plate or bar) and the beam, up to failure.
The stresses and strains in the original beam, at the time of installation of the
composite, can be computed using cracked section elastic analysis.
The composite plates are thin and the center of gravity can be assumed to be located at
a distance, h, from the extreme compression fiber.
Page 45
3) Yielding of steel in tension followed by crushing of concrete; this failure occurs when
the area of FRP is sufficient to generate more tension force than the concrete can
generate in compression after yielding of steel. In this situation, the under-reinforced
beam is transformed to an over-reinforced beam.
4) Shear/tension delamination of the concrete cover or debonding of the FRP from
concrete substrate; although models are available to estimate flexural capacities for
these failure modes, it is not recommended to design beams using this failure model
because the failure mode is very brittle. This failure mode can be prevented by
limiting the maximum stress allowed on the FRP, especially for multiple layers.
A more comprehensive description of the main categories of failure in concrete structures
retrofitted with FRP has been made by experimental observations (Figure 8), Esfahani et al.,
Ashour et al., Garden and Hollaway, Smith and Teng. The first and second type consist of
failure modes where the composite action between concrete and FRP is maintained. Typically,
in the first failure mode, the steel reinforcement yields, followed by rupture of CFRP as
shown in Figure 8(a). In the second type there is failure in the concrete. This type occurs
either due to crushing of concrete before or after yielding of tensile steel without any damage
to the FRP laminate, Figure 8(b), or due to an inclined shear crack at the end of the plate,
Figure 8(c). In the third type, the failure modes involving loss of composite action are
included.
Page 46
The most recognized failure modes within this group are debonding modes. In such a
case, the external reinforcement plates no longer contribute to the beam strength, leading to a
brittle failure if no stress redistribution from the laminate to the interior steel reinforcement
occurs. Figure 8(d)-(g) show failure modes of the third type for RC beams retrofitted with
FRP. In Figure 8(d), the failure starts at the end of the plate due to the stress concentration and
ends up with debonding propagation inwards. Stresses at this location are essentially shear
stress but due to small but non-zero bending stiffness of the laminate, normal stress can arise.
For the case in Figure 8(e) the entire concrete cover is separated.
This failure mode usually results from the formation of a crack at or near the end of
the plate, due to the interfacial shear and normal stress concentrations. Once a crack occurs in
the concrete near the plate end, the crack will propagate to the level of tensile reinforcement
and extend horizontally along the bottom of the tension steel reinforcement. With increasing
external load, the horizontal crack may propagate to cause the concrete cover to separate with
the FRP plate. In Figure 8 (f) and (g) the failure is caused by crack propagation in the concrete
parallel to the bonded plate and adjacent to the adhesive to concrete interface, starting from
the critically stressed portions towards one of the ends of the plate. It is believed to be the
result of high interfacial shear and normal stresses concentrated at a crack along the beam.
Also mid span debonding may take concrete cover with it.
Page 47
Page 48
6) Estimate the thickness of the plate or the number of layers of sheet reinforcement. The
width and number of layers can be adjusted simultaneously to obtain round numbers.
In the case of multiple layer application, it is advisable to use the same width for all
layers.
Page 49
At the initial stages of loading, concrete resists both compression and tension forces.
When the tensile strain in the extreme fiber reaches between 0.0002 and 0.0003, the concrete
starts to crack and the flexural stiffness decreases rapidly. If the instrumentation is sensitive,
the rapid increase in deflection at the onset of cracking can be observed during the
experimental testing. This transition occurs between points 1 and 2, as shown in Figure 9.
Once the tension zone concrete cracks, its tensile force resistance becomes negligible.
The tension force due to external load is primarily carried by reinforcement. The coupling of
tension force carried by reinforcement and the compression force carried by concrete is
achieved by shear through uncracked concrete.
The region between points 2 and 4 in Figure 9 is considered the post-cracking region.
This region terminates at point 4 when reinforcement, typically mild steel, starts to yield. In
almost all cases, the working load lies in this region. In other words, part of the reinforced
concrete beam is cracked under load. The beam sections near simple supports or inflection
points in continuous beams could still be uncracked because of lower moments.
Once the steel starts to yield, the deflection increases rapidly with very little increase
in load (moment). The beam could fail by crushing of concrete or fracture of steel. In most
cases, failure occurs by crushing of concrete, because the strain capacity of steel is very high.
In some cases, the beam may not fail at maximum load. The process called strain softening
Page 50
can occur if concrete could sustain large strains because of confinement. The increase in
deflection between yielding and failure between points 4 and 6 in Figure 9 defines the
ductility of the beam. If the beam is over-reinforced or concrete fails before yielding of steel,
the ductility and the impending warning of failure becomes negligible. Therefore, most codes
of practice around the world restrict the amount of reinforcement to ascertain yielding of steel
before failure. This is achieved by limiting the reinforcement ratio to a fraction of the
balanced reinforcement ratio. At the balanced reinforcement ratio, crushing of concrete and
yielding of steel occur simultaneously.
The cracking load (moment) is slightly larger due to the extra force provided by the
composite.
In the post-crack, preyielding region, between points 2 and 3 in Figure 10(a), the slope
will be higher. The higher stiffness (less deflection) is a function of composite plate
cross-sectional area and modulus of elasticity of the fiber. For example, carbon plates
will provide a larger increase than glass plates. However, in the normal strengthening
range (strength increase less than 50%) the stiffness increase in not significant.
The load (moment) at which yielding of steel occurs will also increase. The increase is
a again function of composite thickness and its modulus of elasticity. Computations of
stiffness and the yield load are presented in the following sections.
The contribution of composite becomes very significant in the post yielding stage,
between points 3 and 4 of Figure 10(a). Since additional contribution of steel is zero in
the yield plateau, post-yield part of the curve is flat for a reinforced concrete beam.
The composite strengthened beam continues to provide strength increase because the
composite force contribution continues at the same level.
Since steel yields prior to failure, failure occurs by crushing of concrete or failure of
composite. Failure of composite could occur due to fracture or delamination. Both
fracture and delamination are brittle but fracture failure is typically less brittle. In
Page 51
addition, fracture can be predicted with more certainty. Therefore, between the two,
failure by fracture of composite is preferred. Even though crushing of concrete is also
sudden, this failure is preferred instead of composite failure. Due to the presence of
some form of confinement, crushing of concrete tends to be less brittle than composite
failure.
Page 52
ii.
iii.
The first one influences the next two parameters. The working load should always be
less than yield load. It is recommended that the increased level of working load controls the
strength and, hence, is a critical parameter in design. For most cases, failure load will control
the design of strengthening system.
Page 53
PART II
Experimental approach
Page 54
CHAPTER IV
Experimental methodology
4.1.
Experimental work
This project has been developed in the Laboratory for Technical Innovation in
Structures and Materials (LITEM) of the Department of Strength of Materials and Structural
Engineering of the Polytechnic University of Catalonia.
The experimental work consisted of testing, under four point loading, 5 simply
supported beams, extensively instrumented with focus on flexural behavior. One of the beams
was used as a control beam and was tested to determine its behavior, ductility and loadcarrying capacity. All beams had the same overall cross-sectional dimensions, and they also
had the same internal longitudinal reinforcement and stirrup arrangement. Two loading
schemes were used, the only difference between them being the distance among the loading
forces.
Four of the five beams were preloaded until flexural cracks appeared and then
retrofitted with CFRP. Two CFRP systems were used for strengthening, consisting of one or
two laminates being applied at the bottom face of the beams. Finally, the retrofitted beams
were loaded until failure and the results were then compared between them, against the
control beam data and with the theoretical design values specified in the ACI 440 and fib 14
standard.
4.1.1. Design and details of Test Beams
The design of the reinforced concrete (RC) beams was based on the following criteria:
Obtain beam dimensions, under four-point bending, that give a shear span-todepth ratio of at least 6 while maintaining an adequate constant movement
region so that the beam can undergo sufficient bending deflection under the
load before failure.
Page 55
All beams had the same dimensions and flexural and shear reinforcements and they
were typically 46 months old at that time. The beams had a rectangular cross section with a
200 mm width, 400 mm height, 4500 mm length and a clear span of 4000 mm. Two 12 mm
steel bars were used for flexural reinforcement at the bottom and top of each beam. Steel
stirrups of 12 mm were spaced every 200 mm for shear reinforcement. The basic concrete
beam without external reinforcement was designed to have sufficient shear strength so as to
fail in flexure.
The tested beams were designed as illustrated below in Figure 11. The used concrete
was class C35/45 and the type of the high-strength steel was B500 S.
For experimental reasons all the beams were painted white and had a 10 x 5 cm grid
drawn on them.
Page 56
The CFRP plates were all identical in size, 50 mm wide X 1,4 mm thick, and were
bonded to the tension face of the beam over a length of 3200 mm, slightly short of the
Page 57
effective span of 4000 mm. The laminates were positioned at the center of the beams width
and length as shown above.
In Table 4, the following parameters are reported: name of the beam, the
corresponding load scheme, the number and area of the FRP laminates glued on the bottom of
beam, steel percentage in tension, s=As/(bH), FRP percentage in tension, FRP=AFRP/(bH),
and equivalent reinforcement percentage, eq=s + EFRP/Es*AFRP/(bH), including steel and
FRP contributes and being EFRP and Es the Youngs modulus of steel bar and fibers,
respectively.
Table 4. Characteristics of the tested beams.
Beam
C-01
B-01
B-02
B-03
B-04
Load
scheme
I
I
I
II
II
Nr. of
laminates
1
2
1
2
FRP area
(mm2)
70
140
70
140
s * 10-2
FRP * 10-2
eq * 10-2
0.280
0.280
0.280
0.280
0.280
0.087
0.175
0.087
0.175
0.280
0.349
0.697
0.349
0.697
All beams had no external anchorages and they were bonded to the concrete with the
same adhesive after surface preparation. A more detailed procedure for applying the CFRP
laminates is described below.
4.1.4. Retrofitting procedure
Before bonding the laminates on the concrete, the surfaces were ground to remove all
contaminations and weak surface layers and to expose the aggregates. Surface preparation
generally has a much greater influence on long term bond durability than it does on initial
bond strength, so that a high standard of surface preparation is essential for promoting long
term bond performance. After this the dust and debris were removed by air blast.
The resultant concrete surface was characterized by a uniformly abraded surface with
exposed small to medium-sized pieces of aggregate (Figure 14).
Page 58
The next step was applying an adhesive-compatible (epoxy) primer. The primer that
comes in two components was mixed thoroughly with a drill equipped with an agitator until a
smooth homogeneous mass was obtained.
The epoxy-based primer was distributed evenly over the entire surface, with the help
of a brush, ensuring complete impregnation of porosity and cavities of the support (Figure 14).
Before proceeding with the implementation of MBrace adhesive the primer was left to cure
for one day.
The epoxy adhesive is prepared the same way as the primer, by mixing the two
components. The mixture was then applied evenly with a trowel (Figure 15) ensuring that on
the rough surfaces all gaps are covered. The epoxy adhesives thickness was maintained
constant at 2 mm throughout the length, for all of the beams.
Figure 16. Applying epoxy adhesive on the bottom of the test beams.
After uncoiling, the laminate to be installed was cut to the proper length. Surface
preparation of the composite plates was accomplished by stripping off a clean, scrubbed,
nylon peel-ply layer molded into one surface during composite fabrication. The laminates
were placed in their final position by using light finger pressure. After checking the location
and the alignment with the help of a rubber roller and a trowel the excess adhesive was
removed.
Page 59
Page 60
4.2.
Seismic Retrofit
Page 61
Properties
Width
Thickness
Cross-sectional area
Density
Fiber volume
Modulus of elasticity Efrp,k
Ultimate tensile strength fu,k
Elongation at break u,k
Units
mm
mm
mm2
g/cm3
%
GPa
N/mm2
%
Values
1,4
50,0
70,0
aprox. 1,6
68
158
2200
1,5
4.2.2. Primer
For a better bonding between the adhesive and the CFRP plates an epoxy-based primer
(MBrace Resin 50) was used.
Advantages:
Excellent adhesion.
Page 62
Mechanical proprieties for the primer utilized in retrofitting the test beams are
described below in Table 6.
Table 6. Epoxy primer proprieties. Data supplied by the manufacturer
Properties
Mixture density (at +20 C)
Pot-life (at +25 C)
Application temperature (support
and material)
Tension tests
Tensile strength at failure
Elongation at break
Flexion tests
Tensile strength at failure
Flexion modulus
Units
g/cm3
minutes
Values
aprox. 1,1
aprox. 20
N/mm2
%
aprox. 22,9 4
aprox. 18,2 7
N/mm2
N/mm2
doesnt break
aprox. 875
4.2.3. Adhesive
The role of the adhesive is to regulate the surface, adhere to and transfer efforts
between the support and resistant compound. The selected adhesive for the project was an
epoxy-based one. The advantages of epoxy resins over other polymers as adhesive agents for
civil engineering use can be summarized as follows (Mays and Hutchinson, 1992):
High surface activity and good wetting properties for a variety of substrates.
May be formulated to have a long open time (the time between mixing and closing of
the joint).
Page 63
High cured cohesive strength, so the joint failure may be dictated by the adherent
strength, particularly with concrete substrates.
Minimal shrinkage on curing, reducing bondline strain and allowing the bonding of
large areas with only contact pressure.
Other advantages include: excellent adhesion to metals and concrete; plastic and
ductile consistency.
These various modifications make epoxy adhesives relatively expensive in comparison
to other adhesives. However, the toughness, range of viscosity and curing conditions, good
handling characteristics, high adhesive strength, inertness, low shrinkage and resistance to
chemicals have meant that epoxy adhesives have found many applications in construction.
Figure 20. The two components that make the epoxy adhesive
The resin used for the bonding of CFRP was a two-part epoxy adhesive (MBrace
laminate adhesive: Concresive 1460) that consisted of components I and II. The nominal
Page 64
mechanical properties of the CFRP and epoxy as given by the manufacturer are presented in
Table 7.
Table 7. Proprieties of the epoxy-based adhesive. Data supplied by the manufacturer.
Properties
Mixture density
Pot-life
Open time
Curing time
Application temperature (support
and material)
Flexural strength (after 7 days)
Compression strength (after 7 days)
Concrete adherence
Shear strength at:
50C
60C
70C
4.3.
Units
g/cm3
minutes
minutes
minutes
Values
aprox. 1,7
aprox. 60
aprox. 30
aprox. 24
N/mm2
N/mm2
N/mm2
N/mm2
aprox. 22,0
aprox. 45,0
> 2,5 (failure in concrete)
aprox. 35,0
aprox. 32,6
aprox. 26,1
Beam
B-01
B-02
B-03
B-04
Gauge
channel
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
7,1
0,0
14,0
0,0
1_1
1_2
1_4
1_5
1_6
1_7
1_8
2_1
2_2
2_3
The number of strain gauges on each beam was 7 or 8 on the bottom face, applied on
the FRP laminates (10 mm long) and 3 corresponding ones on the compression face (50 mm
long). They were placed on half of the beam, for symmetrical reasons, and fitted to match the
flexural cracks developed in the preloading.
Page 65
For each gauge a channel was assigned in order to send the data to the computer. The
locations of all the gauges are shown in the following figures, each one corresponding to one
of the beams.
Page 66
Page 67
To install the strain gauges on the FRP material we had to follow the next steps:
Removing the external protection layer of the already-installed FRP laminate.
Abrasing the surfaces with 320-grit silicon carbide paper (SCP-2) to produce a
satisfactory matte finish.
Figure 27. Positioning the local axes for the strain gauges.
Page 68
Figure 28. Materials needed for cleaning the FRP surface and for bonding the strain gauges.
Positioning and bonding the different strain gauges. The ones placed on the concrete
face need a proper clean surface before being applied.
The strain gauges were bonded using an epoxy-based adhesive and were positioned as
stated before on the center of the flexure cracks developed in the preloading.
They were aligned so that their local axes match the axes of the tested beam.
After the tension measuring strain gauges had been placed the adhesive was left to
cure one day and then the gauges from the compression face were installed.
Page 69
Connecting an RJ45 terminal to each strain gauge so that the signal is transmitted to a
computer database.
Figure 31. Strain gauges with terminals placed on the flexural cracks of the test beams.
Page 70
The tests were carried out using displacement control, and the
applied loads were monitored through a high-accuracy load cell with a
load sensitivity of 0,001 kN. The testing equipment was a testing machine
of 500 kN MTS capacity jack and later we used a 250 kN one.
Model name
244.31
244.41
Stroke (mm)
150-250
150-250
Crack development during the tests was monitored using a digital photo camera and a
digital video camera. Special attention was paid to any signs of premature failure. For this
purpose a high-speed camera was used to film the failure of the FRP composite strengthening
system.
Page 71
The photo above shows the placement and instrumentation of a beam, just before
testing. All the measuring devices are placed and connected to the data acquisitioning system.
The force from the hydraulic actuator is spread by a metal beam placed on top of the RC
beam.
4.4.
The processing of the data was done using various calculations in Microsoft Excel
spreadsheets, Matlab graphic analysis, CAD drawing software and photo editing programs.
The information was analyzed from a qualitative and quantitative perspective.
As reference documentation I used the American ACI 440.2R-02 and the European fib
bulletin no. 14 design guides for externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening RC
structures.
Page 72
CHAPTER V
A large amount of data was obtained from these tests, and only those relevant to this
paper are presented here. The discussions are based on the following topics: load-deflection
analysis, displacement analysis, deformation behavior, interface stress distribution, failure
modes and crack patterns.
After a successive presentation of each of the beams results, regarding a specific topic,
an overall view of the results is made in order to compare and contrast them. In this way, we
can point out some valuable aspects about the behavior of tested beams.
5.1.
The current evaluation utilizes data obtained from the laser measurement system
located at the mid-span of the tested beam (displacement) and from the hydraulic actuator
(force load).
Data was registered until the mid-span deflection was greater than 40 mm. The reason
behind this decision was the fact that all testing specimens had failed well before reaching this
value.
Page 73
The maximum displacement measured at the time the steel reinforcement started to
yield was 19,1 mm.
In the first phase of the test, the control beams stiffness is maintained. Later in the
second phase the stiffness drops significantly (the beam is cracking), while in the last stage
the mid-span deflection grows from 17 mm to 40 mm, with an increase of just 10 kN of load
force.
5.5.2. Retrofitted beam B-01
Page 74
The use of a single CFRP laminate allowed for a strength increase up to 61% greater
than that of the control beam, attaining a maximum load value of Fu= 110,8 kN. The phase
where the fissures start to grow in number and in width is just after 40 kN load.
After failure by FRP debonding, the post-debonding capacity of the tested beam B-01
was Fr= 77 kN, equal to the value reached by the control beam at the same displacement depth.
Mid-span displacement value at failure is 28 mm, 46% greater than that of the control
beam.
The second retrofitted test beam B-02 had two CFRP laminates attached that helped it
to sustain a maximum value load force of 122,4 kN, 77% greater than the load capacity of the
control beam.
Displacement measured at the time of the failure indicates a deflection of 24 mm.
The graphic is somewhat bilinear meaning that the beam stays in elastic domain until
40 kN of force (similar to test beam B-01) and then changing slope until failure (flexural and
shear cracks start to appear and develop).
Failure, in the end, is determined by important shear deformations and not by flexural
cracks. The main reasons for this is the type of the loading scheme (loading forces being
closer to the ends of the beam) and the FRP reinforcement coefficient that rises the resistance
of the beam in flexure with the downside risk of incrementing the shear force.
Page 75
After failure, the post-debonding capacity of the tested beam B-02 was Fr= 71 kN,
almost equal to the value reached by the control beam at the same displacement depth.
The third retrofitted test beam B-03 had one laminate attached, like beam B-01, but a
different load scheme (the forces being closer). The ultimate load force was 89,2 kN, 20%
less than the ultimate load capacity of beam B-01.
Displacement measured at the time of the failure indicates a mid-span deflection of 24
mm.
The graphic is somewhat similar to the ones before but the rigidity of the retrofitted
beam is affected because of the use of only one CFRP laminate. In this way the cracks in the
concrete diminish the stiffness of the beam which explains the changes in the slope of the
graphic line.
After failure, the post-debonding capacity of the tested beam B-03 was Fr= 64 kN, 17%
less than the value reached by the control beam at the same displacement depth.
Page 76
The last retrofitted test beam B-04 had two laminates attached, like beam B-02 and a
load scheme similar to B-03. The ultimate load force was 121,6 kN, 36% greater than the
ultimate load capacity of beam B-01.
Measuring the displacement at the time of the failure indicates a mid-span deflection
of 30 mm, 57 % bigger than the one of the control beam.
After failure by FRP interfacial debonding, the post-debonding capacity of the tested
beam B-04 was Fr= 60 kN.
max, corresponding to Fu, the increase of deflection compared to the level of the control beam,
displ, and the failure mode.
Beam
B-01
B-02
B-03
B-04
C-01
Loading
scheme
I
I
II
II
I
Fu (kN)
Fr (kN)
exp (%)
max (mm)
displ (%)
Failure mode
110,8
122,4
89,2
121,6
69,0
77
71
64
60
-
61
77
29
76
-
28
24
24
30
19,1
46
26
26
57
-
FRP debonding
FRP debonding
FRP debonding
FRP debonding
Steel yielding
The experimental increase in ultimate strength was very significant: almost 80 % for
beams B-02 and B-04 they both utilize two plates of CFRP laminates, 61 % for beam B-01
and only 29 % for beam B-03.
It is very important to take into account different factors which can have a great
influence on the overall results. The increase in strength is strongly dependent on the failure
mode, RC cross sectional properties and on the loading scheme.
Post-debonding capacity is almost the same for beams B-01, B-02 around 77 kN
equal also to the strength of the control beam at the same level of deflection.
General variation of the values of the maximum displacement during failure of the
strengthened beams is around 20 to 30 mm.
The failure mode of the retrofitted beams was FRP debonding.
In Fig. 6 we will illustrate, by overlapping the previous load-deflection graphics, the
different aspects that arise from comparing the results of the strengthened beams between
them and against the control beam.
The load versus displacement curves of the poststrengthened beams show that the
measured response of the specimens varies according to the FRP number of plates applied and
to the loading scheme. The beams with the same loading scheme are colored the same.
It can be noticed that, before concrete cracks, all beams have a similar behavior to the
control beam. After cracking, poststrengthened beams show themselves to be stiffer than the
control beam. Beams B-01, B-02 and B-04 have shown similar behavior.
Page 78
Figure 41. Comparative view of the response behavior of all the tested beams.
It should be noted that if a beam would be loaded until cracking, unloaded, and then
subjected to load again, the stiffness would be somewhat lower the second time due to the
damage in the beam. This explains the reason why the control beams stiffness, until 25 kN
load, is a little bit higher than those of the retrofitted concrete beams.
As shown in the figure, the stiffness of all beams at small load is almost the same.
From a load around 35 kN cracking stage the stiffness of the control beam decreases
notably due to cracking. The decrease in stiffness is smaller for the retrofitted beams since the
CFRP prevents cracks to develop and widen.
The more the CFRP plates the stiffer the beam. This is because the more CFRP
reinforcement area you have the greater the tensile resisting force is, fact which allows the
beam to reach higher deflections and cracking loads.
The loading scheme has also an influence on the ultimate load failure. We can see a
significant increase in the value of beam B-01 compared to B-03. This can be explained by
the fact that it takes a bigger force to produce the same flexural moment as in B-03. On the
other hand B-02 and B-04 exhibit the same ultimate load at failure even though they have
different loading schemes.
One conclusion that can be made regarding the overall behavior response is that for
the same causes and in the same testing conditions, similar results are obtained which imply
similar behaviors.
Page 79
5.2.
In this discussion section of the experimental results, the analysis is based on the
following variables: the flexural moment of the tested beam, which depends on the loading
scheme of the beam and on the force load applied, and the curvature values obtained by
knowing the top strain on the compressive concrete face and the bottom strain on the tension
face of the CFRP laminates.
The graphics depict the behavior of the retrofitted beams subjected to flexural
loading the data being displayed until failure occurs.
The analysis of the moment-curvature relationship points out that the FRP reinforced
beam fails at Mu = 66,5 kNm, a 60 % increase in flexural capacity compared to that of the
control beam.
It can be pointed out that the response of beam B-01 doesnt show an important
difference between the rotational capability during the test. All though a slighter increase in
curvature variation is observed after the 50 kNm moment value has passed.
The maximum curvature value measured just before failure occurred, is 0,015 rad/mm.
Page 80
Applying two CFRP laminates instead on only one increases the ultimate moment load
to Mu = 73,4 kNm, almost 10 % increase over the response of beam B-01 and over 77%
increase over the response of the control beam C-01.
We can notice that the response of beam B-02 looks almost bilinear, making a sudden
change in slope around the value of the moment equal to 25 kNm. The beam maintains its
stiffness over the whole test until failure occurs.
The maximum curvature value, measured just before failure occurred, is 0,011 rad/mm.
Page 81
The ultimate moment, reached by the beam before failure is Mu = 66,9 kNm. This
moment is mostly the same value as for beam B-01m, so the overall increase in strength is
just over 61 %.
Page 82
The analysis of the moment-curvature relationship shows that the FRP reinforced
beam fails at Mu = 91,2 kNm, an astonishing 2,2 times increase in flexural capacity compared
to that of the control beam.
The response of Beam B-04 proves an elastic behavior to the value of 23 kNm. After
this point, the curvature starts to vary faster, while the relationship stays more or less linear to
the end.
The maximum curvature value measured just before failure occurred, is 0,017 rad/mm.
Figure 46. Comparison in terms of moment-curvature relationships between CFRP strengthened beams.
As we can observe, at the beginning of the test beam B-01 doesnt poses the same
stiffness as the other beams, due to the fact that it had been preloaded slightly more. Anyway
the values of the moment-curvature relationship for each beam, reach the same point, around
30 knNm. After this value we notice the following fact: the beams that had attached only one
laminate (B-01 and B-03) diverge from the response behavior of the beams which had two
CFRP laminates attached. The results of this analysis are written down in Table 11.
Page 83
Beam
Mu (kNm)
exp (%)
B-01
B-02
B-03
B-04
C-01
66,5
73,4
66,9
91,2
41,4
60
77
61
220
-
u
(rad/mm)
0,015
0,011
0.015
0.017
-
In terms of ultimate moment capacity, beams B-01 and B-03 have a 60 % increase
over the response of the control beam. When failure by plate debonding occurred, they both
have the same curvature, 0,015 rad/mm.
In the case of the beams retrofitted with two plates, there is a different story. Beam
B-04 had an ultimate moment load 2,2 times greater than that of the control beam while B-02
had a value of only 0,77 greater. This can be explained by the fact that the type of failure
which occurred in beam B-02 was of a different kind. Because of the loading scheme used,
important the cracks developed in the shear region, causing the beam to fail by concrete cover
separation.
It can be noticed that the beams which had double the area of FRP reinforcement, had
a bigger increase in the maximum load capacity than that of the single-plated beams 37%.
All though, in terms of curvature, the difference is just over 10 %.
5.3.
The examination of the fracture surfaces of the poststrengthened beams raised the
possibility that the debonding failure was caused by differential displacements in crack tips.
The development of a crack in the concrete substrate might produce high strain concentration
points in the FRP, inducing the tensile or shear failure of the reinforcement plate, or might
initiate a local debonding, which then progresses alongside the beam.
After failure of the tested beams, observations were made concerning the remained
patterns on the face of the CFRP strips that was in contact with the epoxide adhesive. As
shown in Figure 47, for the beams where the debonding started in the middle, initiated by
flexural cracks, there is a pattern that tells about the way the interfacial stress was transferred
during cracking of the beam.
Page 84
Figure 47. Debonding patterns on the middle of the CFRP strips, after failure.
On the other hand, after the FRP started to debond from the mid-span of the beam, the
ends of the plate do not show any patterns, sign that they were pulled suddenly off by the
energy of the failure (Figure 48).
Figure 48. Debonding patterns on the end of the CFRP strips, after failure.
In the unstrengthened beam, the stress in steel bars increases until the steel reaches its
yield point. Thereafter, a large portion of any extra stress is absorbed by large deformations in
the steel, which lowers the increase of concrete compressive strain. In strengthened beams,
tensile stresses are shared between the steel bars and the strengthening plates, so the stresses
Page 85
carried by the steel bars will be less and may not reach the yield strength of steel. Therefore,
concrete strains in the strengthened beams are higher than those in the control beam at the
same load.
The next figures show the experimental strain profiles for the bottom CFRP strip(s), in
the high-moment region and at the plates end, for the tested beams, from no load to failure.
The graphics are computed for only one half of the beam and were obtained by strain gauges
placed on the bottom FRP face, on top of the cracks induced by the preloading.
The comparison is good for the lowest load, while at levels closer to the maximum
load the experimental behavior becomes more irregular, probably due to development of
cracking, that the linear model does not simulate.
The CFRP strain behavior is similar for all of the beams, and differences between
stiffness and strength are similar to those observed in the load-deflection response.
The strain profile for the B-01 beam indicates that the final strain at a force equal to
110,9 kN is just over 5500 . The maximum value is recorded, as expected, in the middle
point of the beam.
Page 86
The strain grows constant until a value of the force of 80 kN. After this point the strain
increase is bigger.
Near the point load we can see a raise, and then a sudden drop until the plates end,
where the stress is at minimum. When the loads get bigger, the strain in this area goes up as
well.
The strain profile for the B-02 beam shows that the final strain is 3800 . The
maximum value is registered, not as expected, at 100 mm to the right of the point load. The
value is really low, bearing in mind that only 27% of the CFRPs capacity is used.
This facts can be explained because of the important shear deformations which
occurred in that area, causing the failure to happen in the concrete cover area, towards the end
of the beam.
This could be prevented by the use of an additional anchorage system applied at the
beams end, so to counteract premature failures by peeling-off.
Page 87
As with the case of beam B-01, the biggest tensile strain, registered on the FRP plate is
at the middle of the span. An approx. 5200 is noted. Near the point load we can see a raise,
and then a sudden drop until the plates end, where the stress is at minimum.
Until 60 kN of force, the growth is slower and then it starts to increase until the failure.
5.3.4. Retrofitted beam B-04
Page 88
Like in previous cases, the maximum registered tensile strain is at the mid-span of the
beam, registering a value of approx. 5900 . In addition, there is a slight raise in the stress
near the point of load.
After the constant moment area, the stress starts to decline towards the end of the plate.
As the load gets higher, the stresses there increase also.
Beam
B-01
B-02
B-03
B-04
Loading
scheme
I
I
II
II
Mu (kNm)
66,5
73,4
66,9
91,2
AFRP
(mm2)
70
140
70
140
u,FRP
(m)
5527
3800
5178
5858
u,FRP
(MPa)
873
600
818
926
FRP ratio
(%)
40
27
37
42
Another thing that can be observed from the values written in the table is that the
average strain was between 5000 and 6000 , sign that could indicate that the ultimate
tensile strength developed in the CFRP plates is independent of the area of composite
reinforcement.
Beam B-02 developed a lower strain because of the different type of failure, discussed
before (concrete cover separation).
The average FRP utilization ratio was 40%. This could mean that further improvement
can be made in the design of the retrofitting system, by including anchorages at the beams
ends in order to prevent premature failures by delamination.
Page 89
5.4.
Displacement analysis
A short analysis of the deflection measured on the tested beams is made in the next
pages. The graphical analysis is made from a different point of view than before: examining
the deflection of the beam along its length, at different force loads.
Page 90
Page 91
As the load increases for the control beam, the displacements are bigger for the same
amount of load increase.
Comparing the previous graphics we notice that the retrofitted beams develop lower
displacements for higher force loads than the control beam.
The maximum values registered are between 20 and 30 mm.
5.5.
All beams experienced a brittle failure mechanism, the only type of failure being
characterized by the loss of composite action my plate debonding. plate . This failure was due
to high shear stress occurring at the interface with the CFRP plates. The properties of the
adhesive are probably important in relation to the debonding failure. A lower stiffness and
higher fracture energy will probably weaken the tendency of debonding.
The types of beam failure are summarized in
For specimens B-01, B-03 and B-04 the debonding had initiated in the pure bending
region, and then propagated towards one of the supports. The debonding plane occurred a few
Page 92
mm inside the thin concrete cover and in some places along the interface in the adjacent
adhesive layer.
For B-02 debonding occurred earlier than for the other retrofitted beams. The main
reason leading to this is the higher shear stress concentration, near the plates ends. The
debonding plane was observed inside the concrete cover along the steel reinforcement, as we
will show later.
Maintaining composite action of the strengthened beam is essential to the satisfactory
performance of the plate-bonded beams, so adequate anchorage of the CFRP plate at the ends
and at other critical sections of the beams are essential prerequisites to maintain this
composite action up to failure.
Table 133. No adhesion failures took place at the bonded interfaces. Plate detachment,
when it occurred, resulted typically in a layer of adhesive and cement paste still being
attached to the FRP surface. Failure modes fell broadly into two groups, those that initiated
within the constant moment zone (Figure 58) and those that seemed to occur within the shear
span of the beams (Figure 59). The mode of failure was found to be dependent on the amount
of external FRP reinforcement and on the designed loading scheme.
For specimens B-01, B-03 and B-04 the debonding had initiated in the pure bending
region, and then propagated towards one of the supports. The debonding plane occurred a few
mm inside the thin concrete cover and in some places along the interface in the adjacent
adhesive layer.
Page 93
For B-02 debonding occurred earlier than for the other retrofitted beams. The main
reason leading to this is the higher shear stress concentration, near the plates ends. The
debonding plane was observed inside the concrete cover along the steel reinforcement, as we
will show later.
Maintaining composite action of the strengthened beam is essential to the satisfactory
performance of the plate-bonded beams, so adequate anchorage of the CFRP plate at the ends
and at other critical sections of the beams are essential prerequisites to maintain this
composite action up to failure.
Table 13. Failure characteristics for each beam.
Beam
Loading
scheme
No. of
CFRP
plates
Mu
(kNm)
Type of
cracks
B-01
66,5
B-02
73,4
F-S
B-03
II
66,9
B-04
II
91,2
F-S
C-01
41,4
General
failure type
Plate
debonding
Plate
debonding
Plate
debonding
Plate
debonding
Steelyielding
The crack propagation and the final crack patterns of the reinforced beams are greatly
different from that of the control beam. The control beam had few flexural cracks with large
width, and the retrofitted beam had many flexural cracks with smaller width. This indicates
that the propagation of cracks was confined by the CFRP laminates. In addition, the cracks in
B-02 and B-04 were fewer and had smaller width than in the other retrofitted beams.
The specimens strengthened with two CFRPs (B-02, B-04) were characterized by the
occurrence of shear and flexural cracks before debonding. However, the specimens
strengthened with a single CFRP strip were characterized by the occurrence of only flexural
cracks before debonding.
In the next pages, through the use of photography, the failure modes and crack patterns
are described for each of the tested beams.
Page 94
Page 95
The control beam C-01, developed only flexural cracks during the test. The failure
mode was by yielding of the tensile steel reinforcing.
Page 96
For the first retrofitted beam, B-01, the failure by intermediate crack interfacial
debonding was initiated by a flexural crack from the constant-moment region. In the photos
we can see close-ups of the bottom face of the test beam where concrete has been expelled
strongly, near cracks, by the failure.
Beam B-02 failed by plate debonding through concrete cover separation initiated by
shear deformations near the beams end. The failure was a very brittle. We can notice in
Figure 66 where is the crack that started this mechanism. It is a typical shear fissure in the
concrete, from the point of load toward the beams end.
In Figure 65 the bottom steel bars are exposed by the failure. Some epoxy adhesive is
still attached to the beam.
Page 97
Failure in beam B-03 occurred in the same way as for beam B-01, by intermediate
crack interfacial debonding.
Figure 68 shows the aftermath of the failure: the FRP plate has debonded and the
flexural cracks in the concrete beam start to grow.
In Figure 67 we can see how the superficial concrete cover, where the CFRP strip was
attached, is expelled by the brittle failure mechanism.
Page 98
The last beam that has been tested failed like previous ones, by means of plate
debonding caused by important flexural deformations.
In Figure 70 the bottom face of the beam is exposed after the failure. One end of the
FRP plate is still attached. Flexural cracks that are present determined the way the composite
system failed.
In Figure 69 we can see that pieces of the superficial concrete layer are still attached to
the FRP laminate through the help of the adhesive.
Page 99
CHAPTER VI
6.1.
Conclusions
All though the use of FRP strengthening systems is a relatively new solution for the
retrofitting of reinforced concrete elements, there is an important number of studies that try to
cover almost every aspect regarding the use, characteristics and response behavior of this
systems.
From literature review, we can notice that researchers can be classified as following:
-
The ones that recognize excessively the efficiency of FRP systems and try to
establish it as an universal solution for the strengthening of concrete structures.
The ones who adopt a more realistic approach, recognizing the true advantages of
the FRP systems but at the same time showing that, certainly in some cases, the
use of such materials has disadvantages. Because of this they recommend further
studies which can research critical issues that diminish the efficiency of composite
materials (surface adhesion, durability, etc.)
Starting from the scientific results obtained in other research papers, we tried to study
the efficiency of FRP systems in strengthening RC members. The main subject of this paper is
the reinforcing of concrete beams with CFRP laminates with the objective of studying the
response behavior of elements under flexural load. The specific objectives of this study are:
load-displacement analysis; deformation behavior; interface stress distribution; displacement
analysis; failure modes and crack patterns.
In order to attain these goals, we tested five reinforced concrete beams, differently
prepared: one control beam, two beams with one CFRP laminate attached and another two
with a pair of the same CFRP laminate.
The analysis focused mainly on the ultimate behavior and allowed assessing the
strength gains provided by FRP system. Based on the specific findings of this research, the
following conclusions may be drawn:
The externally bonded CFRPs have increased the stiffness and maximum load
of the beams.
Page 100
For every type of plate-bonded beam, there is a limiting point beyond which no
further increase in beam strength can be obtained. The ultimate load-carrying
capacities of plated beams depend largely on the characteristics of the cover
concrete.
The results match closely the theoretical formulations from the American and
European design codes.
The crack width and the deflection have decreased for the strengthened beams.
The results showed that the main failure mode was plate debonding which
reduces the efficiency of retrofitting.
The strains registered in the CFRP laminates indicated that the capacity of the
composite system was not fully utilized (only 40%).
The place of failure in beams, reinforced with two laminates, was in the cover
concrete close to the point loads within the shear span of the beams. However,
with a distance increase between the forces, the locus of failure moved toward
the plate ends, thus shear and normal (peel) stresses at the plate ends increase.
Previous experiments by Garcez et al. (2004) have pointed out that the use of welldesigned additional anchorage straps delay premature failures by peeling off and might
increase the load capacity and ductility of a poststrengthened beam, because they provide
better anchorage and hinder the development of inclined cracks in the shear span.
Page 101
6.2.
Page 102
motivated by immediate, obvious needs for improved, economical materials for the repair and
retrofit of structures that are obsolete, degraded, or located in seismic zones. In other cases
such as new construction, where the need for new materials is not always clear from a shortterm economic standpoint, standards and codes will facilitate the use of FRP materials so that
additional long-term experience can be accrued. This experience may eventually lead to the
realization of promised life-cycle cost benefits of FRP materials by designers and owners of
structures.
One of the most mature applications of FRP in concrete infrastructure is its use for
structural strengthening and repair. This is largely carried out through external FRP
applications and has resulted in a number of formal guidelines, including ACI 440.2R (ACI
Committee 440 2002). External FRP was interpreted to include bonded, mechanically
anchored, post-tensioned, and near-surface-mounted FRP systems. Barriers to broader use
again focus on the lack of long-term performance data and the critical identified research
priority is to develop an understanding of time-related effects for external FRP applications.
Long-term performance relating to the effects of fatigue, creep, and relaxation, in
addition to degradation of the resin and adhesive (or bond line) systems, are specifically
identified as critical research needs. Another key area identified as requiring research focus is
the use of FRP materials for seismic retrofit applications. There is a consensus that there are
significant gaps in this area, including seismic retrofit of connection regions, concrete, and
masonry walls. Behavior of bonded FRP under conditions of large stress and/or deformation
reversals as induced by seismic loading is also identified as requiring greater research
attention.
Page 103
References
1.
ACI 440.1R-03: Guide for the Design and Construction of Concrete Reinforced with FRP Bars,
Detroit, MI: American Concrete Institute, 2003.
2.
ACI 440.2R-02: Design and Construction of Externally Bonded FRP Systems for
Strengthening Concrete Structures, Detroit, MI: American Concrete Institute, 2002.
3.
Amateau, M.F. (2003) Properties of Fibers. Course Notes for Mechanical Engineering 471:
Pennsylvania State University, Engineering Composite Materials.
4.
Anania, L., Badal, A., and Failla, G. (2005). Increasing the flexural performance of RC beams
strengthened with CFRP materials. Constr. Build. Mater., 19(1), 5561.
5.
Arduini M., Di Tommaso A., Nanni A., (1997) Brittle failure in FRP plate and sheet bonded
beams, ACI Structural Journal, vol. 94, n. 4: pp. 363-370.
6.
Ashour, AF., El-Refaie, S.A., and Garrity, SW. (2002) Flexural strengthening of RC
continuous beams using CFRP laminates. Cement & Concrete Composites 2004; 26: 765- 775.
7.
Bakis, C. E., Bank, L. C., Brown, V. L., Cosenza, E., Davalos, J. F., Lesko, J. J., Machida, A.,
Rizkalla, S. H., and Triantafilliou, T. C. (2002), Fiber-reinforced polymer composites for construction:
state-of-the-art review, Journal of Composites for Construction, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 7387.
8.
Bizindavyi, L., and Neale, K. W. (1999), Transfer lengths and bond strengths for composites
bonded to concrete, Journal of Composites for Construction, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 153160.
9.
Brena, S. F., and Macri, M. M. (2004). Effect of carbon fiber reinforced polymer laminate
configuration on the behavior of strengthened reinforced concrete beams J. Compos. Constr., 8(3),
229240.
10.
Brena, S. F., Bramblett, R. M., Wood, S. L., and Kreger, M. E. (2003). Increasing flexural
capacity of reinforced concrete beams using carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites. ACI Struct. J.,
100(1), 3646.
11.
Buyukozturk, O., and Hearing, B. (1998). Failure behavior of precracked concrete beams
retrofitted with FRP. J. Compos. Constr., 2(3), 138144.
12.
York.
13.
Canadian Standards Association International (CSA). (2002). Design and construction of
building components with fiber reinforced polymers. CSA-S8-06, Toronto.
14.
Chai, Y. H., Priestley, M. J. N., and Seible, F. (1991), Seismic retrofit of circular bridge
columns for enhanced flexural performance, ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 88, No. 5, pp. 572584.
Page 104
Hancox, N.L. (1981) Fiber Composite Hybrid Materials. New York: MacMillan Publishing Co.
30.
Hollaway, L. C., and Head, P. R. (2001), Advanced Polymer Composites and Polymers in the
Civil Infrastructure, Elsevier, London.
Page 105
IBC (2003), International Building Code, International Code Council, Falls Church, VA.
34.
Iyer, L., and Sen, R. (1991), Advanced Composites for Civil Engineering Structures, ASCE,
Reston, VA.
35.
Japan Society of Civil Engineers (JSCE). (2001). Recommendations for the upgrading of
concrete structures with use of continuous fiber sheets. Concrete engineering series 41, Tokyo.
36.
Jones, R., Swamy, R. N., and Ang, T. H. (1982). Under- and overreinforced concrete beams
with glued steel plates. Int. J. Cement Compos. and Lightweight Concrete, London, 4(4), 1932.
37.
Jones, R., Swamy, R. N., Bloxham, J., and Bouderbalah, A. (1980). Composite behavior of
concrete beams with epoxy bonded external reinforcement. Int. J. Cement Compos. and Lightweight
Concrete, London, 2(2), 91107.
38.
Kachlakev, D. and McCurry, D. (2000) Testing of Full-size Reinforced Concrete Beams
Strengthened with FRP Composites: Experimental Results and Design Methods Verification Report
No. FHWA-OR-00-19. Washington, DC: United States Department of Transportation Federal Highway
Administration.
39.
Kaminska, M. E., and Kotynia, R. (2000). Experimental research on RC beams strengthened
with CFRP strips. Rep. No. 9, Dept. of Concrete Structures, Technical Univ. of Lodz, Poland.
40.
Karbhari, V. M. (1998), Use of Composite Materials in Civil Infrastructure in Japan,
International Technology Research Institute, World Technology (WTEC) Division, Baltimore, MD.
41.
Katsumata, H., Kobatake, Y., and Takeda, T. (1988), A study on strengthening with carbon
fiber for earthquake-resistant capacity of existing reinforced concrete columns, Proceedings of the 9th
World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, TokyoKyoto, August 29, Vol. VII, pp. 517522.
42.
Kotynia, R. (1999). Ductility and load capacity of reinforced concrete members strengthened
with CFRP laminates. Ph.D. thesis, Technical Univ. of Lodz, Poland.
43.
Kotynia, R. (2000). Load bearing capacity and strains of reinforced concrete beams
strengthened with carbon composite plates. Proc. 3rd Int. PhD Symp. in Civil Engineering, Vol. 2,
Vienna, Austria, 193202.
44.
Kurtz, S. (2000) Analysis and Prediction of Delamination of Strengthened Beams. PhD thesis,
New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 610 pp.
45.
Ladner, M., and Weder, Ch. (1981). Concrete structures with bonded external reinforcements.
EMPA Rep. 206, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research, Dubendorf,
Switzerland.
46.
Macdonald, M. D. (1978). The flexural behavior of concrete beams with bonded external
reinforcement. Rep. SR 415, Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, U.K.
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
ANNEX
Technical Glossary
(Source: fib 2001)
Page 110
Epoxide Compound containing a three-member ring consisting of two carbon atoms and
one oxygen atom.
Epoxy Resin A polymer resin characterized by epoxide molecule groups.
Fabric, Non-woven A material formed from fibers or yarns without interlacing.
Fabric, Woven A material constructed of interlaced yarns, fibers or filaments.
Fiber A general term used to refer to filamentary materials. Fiber is often used
synonymously with filament.
Filaments Individual fibers of indefinite length used in tows, yarns or rovings.
Filler A relatively non-adhesive substance added to an adhesive to improve its working
properties, permanence, strength or other qualities.
FRP - Fiber Reinforced Polymer.
GFRP - Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer.
Glass Fiber Reinforcing fiber made by drawing molten glass through brushings. The
predominant reinforcement for polymer matrix composites. Known for its good strength,
processability and low cost.
Glass Transition Temperature (Tg) Approximate temperature above which increased
molecular mobility causes a material to become rubbery rather than brittle. The measured
value of Tg can vary, depending on the test method.
Glue See adhesive.
Hand Lay-up A fabrication method in which reinforcement layers are placed in a mould or
on a structure by hand, then cured to the formed shape.
Hardener Substance that reacts with the resin to promote or control curing action by taking
part in it. Also a substance added to control the degree of hardness of the resin.
Impregnate To saturate the voids of a reinforcement with a resin manually or with a
machine.
Interlaminar shear shear force acting at the interface between adjacent layers (laminae) of
a laminate.
Laminate To unite layers of material with an adhesive. Also, a product made by bonding
together two or more layers of materials.
Lay-up Placement of layers of reinforcement in a mould.
Page 111
Matrix Binder material in which reinforcing fiber is embedded. Usually a polymer but may
also be metal or a ceramic.
Open time The time interval between the spreading of the adhesive on the adherent and the
completion of the assembly of the parts for bonding.
PAN (polyacrylonitrile) Used as a base material or precursor in the manufacture of certain
carbon fibers.
Pitch A high molecular weight material that is a residue from the destructive distillation of
coal and petroleum products. Pitches are used as base materials for the manufacture of certain
high-modulus carbon fibers.
Polyester Unsaturated polyesters are manufactured by reacting glycols with either dibasic
acids or anhydrides. Polyesters are normally cured at room temperature with a monomer such
as styrene.
Polymer Large molecule formed by combining many smaller molecules or monomers in a
regular pattern.
Polymerisation Chemical reaction that links monomers together to form polymers.
Post-cure An additional elevated temperature exposure to improve mechanical properties.
Pot life Length of time in which a catalysed thermosetting resin retains sufficiently low
viscosity for processing.
Prepreg Resin-impregnated fabric or filaments in flat form that can be stored at very low
temperature for later use in moulds or hand lay-up. The resin is often partially cured to a tackfree state.
Primer A coating applied to a surface prior to the application of an adhesive to improve the
performance of the bond. The coating can be a low viscosity fluid that is typically a 10%
solution of the adhesive in an organic solvent, which can wet out the adherent surface to leave
a coating over which the adhesive can readily flow.
Pultrusion An automated, continuous process for manufacturing composite rods and
structural shapes having a constant cross section. Roving and/or tows are saturated with resin
and continuously pulled through a heated die, where the part is formed and cured. The cured
part is then cut to length. For some applications fabrics can be included into the profiles.
Putty repair mortar.
Reinforcement Key element added to matrix to provide the required properties. Ranges
from short and continuous fibers through complex textile forms.
Page 112
Resin Polymer with indefinite and often high molecular weight and a softening or melting
range that exhibits a tendency to flow when subjected to stress. As composite matrices, resins
bind together reinforcement fibers.
Roving A collection of bundles of continuous filaments either as untwisted strands or as
twisted yarns.
Sheet See fabric, non-woven.
Shelf Life Length of time in which a material can be stored and continue to meet the
specifications requirements, remaining suitable for its intended use.
Stress Corrosion Corrosion due to the effect of a corrosive environment, which is activated
in the presence of stress.
Stress Rupture The reduction of tensile strength due to sustained loading.
Strip Pre-manufactured forms made of fibers and resin. Strips are normally pultruded.
Thermoplastic A composite matrix capable of being repeatedly softened by an increase of
temperature and hardened by cooling.
Thermoset Composite matrix cured by heat and pressure or with a catalyst into an infusible
and insoluble material. Once cured a thermoset cannot be returned to the uncured state.
Thixotropy A property of adhesive systems to thin upon isothermal agitation and to thicken
upon subsequent rest. Thixotropic materials have a high static shear strength and low dynamic
shear strength at the same time. They lose their viscosity under stress.
Tow An untwisted bundle of continuous filaments, usually designated by a number
followed by K, indicating multiplication by 1000. For example, 12 K tow has 12000 filaments.
Unidirectional A strip or fabric with all fibers oriented in the same direction.
Vinyl ester A class of thermosetting resins containing esters of acrylic and/or methacrylic
acids, many of which have been made from epoxy resin. Cure is accomplished, as with
unsaturated polyesters, by co-polymerisation with other vinyl monomers, such as styrene.
Viscosity Tendency of a material to resist flow. As temperature increases, the viscosity of
most materials decreases.
Warp Yarns running lengthwise and perpendicular to the narrow edge of woven fabric.
Weft Yarns running perpendicular to the warp in a woven fabric.
Wet Lay-up Fabrication step involving application of a resin to dry reinforcement.
Page 113