Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/optcom
Abstract
We examine theoretically the transmission characteristics of the Single modeMultimodeSingle mode (SMS) ber
structures when the spot sizes of the fundamental modes of the single and multimode bers do not match. It is observed
that in such cases, the transmitted power becomes highly sensitive to the wavelength of operation and the length of the
multimode ber used. The study should be useful in the design of ecient ber optic microbend sensors and novel
wavelength lters using SMS structures.
2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Fiber optic sensor; Microbend sensors; SMS structures
1. Introduction
Fiber optic sensors based on intensity modulation are the easiest to realize, and amongst these,
microbend sensors have been studied extensively
[14]. In the conventional microbend sensors, a
large number of modes are excited, and the microbend induced loss is a measure of the power
coupled to the radiation modes. As a result, the
performance of the conventional microbend sensors is highly dependent on the launching conditions at the input end of the ber.
Donlagic and Culshaw [5] have proposed a
novel microbend sensor structure consisting of two
0030-4018/03/$ - see front matter 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/S0030-4018(03)01289-6
216
2. Analysis
We consider a SMS structure consisting of two
identical single mode bers spliced (axially
aligned) at both the ends of a multimode parabolic
core ber of length L (see Fig. 1). The transmitted
power through such a structure can be obtained as
follows. The power coupled from one ber to the
other at each splice can be obtained by calculating
the overlap integrals between the guided modes of
the two bers [68]. The fundamental mode-eld
(normalized with respect to the whole cross-section
of the ber) of the single mode ber can be approximated as [8]
r
2 1 r2 =w2
S ;
wS r
e
1
p wS
where wS represents the Gaussian spot size of the
mode, and in the case of step index bers, it can be
approximated by
"
#
wS
1:619 2:879
0:65 3=2
;
aS
VS6
VS
0:8 6 VS 6 2:5;
2
n20 n2cl
;
2n20
2aM
p
wM
k0 n0 2DM
1=2
s
2
aM
;
VM
where VM represents the V-number of the multimode ber. Further, the propagation constants of
the mth symmetric mode is given by [8,9]
1=2
22m 1aM
bm k0 n0 1
; m 0; 1; 2; . . . ;
k02 n20
6
where
aM
k0 n0 p
2DM VM =a2M 2=w2M :
aM
;
9
jwm j r dr 1 l2 1 l2
0
where l wS =wM . Since dierent guided modes
travel with dierent propagation constants, the
total eld w at the output end of the multimode
ber of length L can be written as
X
wz L
Am wm eibm L :
10
At the second splice, now the power would couple
from various modes of the multimode ber to the
lead-out single mode ber. The power (PSM ) coupled to the lead-out ber would then be given by
Z 1
2
w S wz Lr dr
PSM
0
2
A2 A2 eib0 b1 L A2 eib0 b2 L :
0
11
217
L
Lk:
13
aM
pa2M n0
The above equation shows that DU changes linearly with wavelength. Thus one expects that the
output power should vary periodically with
wavelength with a period (Dk2p ) over which DU
changes by 2p. This can easily be calculated using
Eq. (13) and is given by
Dk2p
p2 a2M n0
:
2DM L
14
218
219
4. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the Department of Science and Technology, Government
of India, through a research project R&D in
Fiber Optic Modal Sensors.
References
[1] L. Lnichola, H.C. James, A.B. Joseph, Appl. Opt. 26 (1987)
21712180.
[2] E. Udd, J.P. Theriault, A.M. John, Proc. SPIE 1170 (1990)
478482.
[3] J.W. Berthold, J. Lightwave Technol. 13 (1995) 11931199.
[4] D. Donlagic, M. Zavrsnik, Opt. Lett. 22 (1997) 837839.
[5] D. Donlagic, B. Culshaw, J. Lightwave Technol. 17 (1999)
18561868.
[6] H. Kogelnik, Coupling and conversion coecients for
optical modes, in: Proc. Sympos. Quas. Opt., Polytechnic
Institute of Brooklyn, 1964, pp. 333347.
[7] J.P. Meunier, S.I. Hosain, J. Lightwave Technol. 10 (1992)
15211526.
[8] A.K. Ghatak, K. Thyagarajan, Introduction to Fiber
Optics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.
[9] D. Marcuse, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 68 (1978) 103109.