Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 63

1

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Fire resistance assessment of Composite structures


Basic design methods
Worked examples
CAJOT Louis-Guy
Chairman of CEN/TC250/SC4/EG - Fire Part
ArcelorMittal

The Building (R+5)


2

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

120mm slab
COFRAPLUS 60
Composite beams
IPE450

Partially encased
composite columns
HE260A

Bracing system

Structure grid of the composite building


3

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Composite slab, composite beams, composite columns


S2
1

6m
3m

3m

6m
3m

3m

6m
3m

3m

6m
3m

3m

6m
3m

3m

Bracing system

Bracing system

7m
Bracing system

14 m

S1
7m

S1

C
Bracing system

S2

S1 - S1

Structure grid of the composite building


4

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Actions (for all floor levels)

Self weight G1
9Composite slab unit weight : 2.12 kN/m
9Steel structural members

Permanent load G2
9Finishing, embedded services, partitions : 1.50 kN/m

Faade G3 : 2 kN/m

Characteristic values of variable loads and factors

Type

qk

Live load on floors


Snow on roof

4.0 kN/m

0.7

0.6

1.7 kN/m

0.2

0.0

Structure grid of the composite building


Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Structural members

Composite slab
9 Total thickness: 12 cm
9 Steel deck: COFRAPLUS60
9 Thickness of steel deck: 0.75 mm
9 Continuous slab over 2 spans

Secondary beams
9 IPE450 linked with headed studs to the composite slab; fire
protected steel sections
9 Alternative : Partially encased composite beams IPE450; fire
protection obtained through partial encasement

Columns for ground level


9 Facade columns: Partially encased HEA260
9 Alternative: Fully encased HEB160

Structure grid of the composite building


6

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Composite slab, composite beams, composite columns


S2
1

6m
3m

3m

6m
3m

3m

6m
3m

3m

6m
3m

3m

6m
3m

3m

Bracing system

Bracing system

7m
Bracing system

14 m

S1
7m

S1

C
Bracing system

S2

S1 - S1

Structure grid of the composite building


7

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Composite slab continuous on 3 supports


S2
1

6m
3m

3m

6m
3m

3m

6m
3m

3m

6m
3m

3m

6m
3m

3m

Bracing system

Bracing system

7m
Bracing system

14 m

S1
7m

S1

C
Bracing system

S2

S1 - S1

Verification of the composite slab


8

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Summary of data

3m

3m

Slab thickness = 12cm

Required fire resistance : R60

Verification of the composite slab


9

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Material characteristics
Steel decking :

fy = 350 N/mm

Concrete :

C25/30 ; fc = 25 N/mm

Rebars :

fy = 500 N/mm
Mesh ST25 ; A = 2,57 cm/m
Ribs : 1 8 /rib

Loads
Permanent loads:
Steel decking :

gt,k = 0,085 kN/m

Concrete :

gb,k = 2,03 kN/m

Permanent load :

gc,k = 1,5 kN/m

Variable load :

qk = 4,0 kN/m

Variable load:

Verification of the composite slab


10

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Geometric parameters
COFRAPLUS60
1m

l1
l3

h1 = 62 mm
l1 = 101 mm

18 per rib
= 2,51 cm/m

h2 = 58 mm h3 = 0
l2 = 62 mm l3 = 106 mm

Application field
Trapezoidal steel decking
profiles [mm]

Existing geometric parameters


[mm]

Condition fulfilled ?

80 l1 155

l1 = 101

OK

32 l2 132

l2 = 62

OK

40 l3 115

l3 = 106

OK

50 h1 125

h1 = 62

OK

50 h2 100

h2 = 58

OK

Verification of the composite slab


11

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Fire resistance according to thermal insulation


ti = a0 + a1 h1' + a2 + a3

A
1
A 1
+ a4
+ a5
Lr
l3
Lr l 3

ti = ( 28,8) + 1,55 h1' + ( 12,6) + 0,33

A
1
A 1
+ ( 735 )
+ 48
Lr
l3
Lr l 3

For Normal Weight Concrete


a0
[min]
-28,8

a1
[min/mm]
1,55

a2
[min]
-12,6

a3
[min/mm]
0,33

a4
mmmin
-735

a5
[min]
48

Verification of the composite slab


12

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Fire resistance according to thermal insulation


ti = a0 + a1 h1' + a2 + a3

A
1
A 1
+ a4
+ a5
Lr
l3
Lr l 3

ti = ( 28,8) + 1,55 62 + ( 12,6) + 0,33

l3

A
1
A 1
+ ( 735 )
+ 48
Lr
106
Lr 106

l1 = 101

l3 = 53

h3=0

h1=62

h2=58

Exposed Surface

l2 = 62
h1' = h1 + h3 = 62 mm

(h3 = thickness of the screed)

Verification of the composite slab


13

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Fire resistance according to thermal insulation


ti = a0 + a1 h1' + a2 + a3

A
1
A 1
+ a4
+ a5
Lr
l3
Lr l 3

ti = ( 28,8) + 1,55 62 + ( 12,6) + 0,33 25,6 + ( 735 )

l3

l1= 101

h3=0

l3 = 53

Rib geometry factor

A
=
Lr

h1=62

h2=58

Exposed Surface

l2 = 62

1
1
+ 48 25,6
106
106

l +l
h2 1 2
2
l l
l 2 + 2 h22 + 1 2
2

= 25,6 mm

Verification of the composite slab


14

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Fire resistance according to thermal insulation


ti = a0 + a1 h1' + a2 + a3

A
1
A 1
+ a4
+ a5
Lr
l3
Lr l 3

ti = ( 28,8) + 1,55 62 + ( 12,6) 0,727 + 0,33 25,6 + ( 735 )

1
1
+ 48 25,6
106
106

ti = 71min
l3

l1= 101

l3 = 53

View factor

h3=0

2
2

l
l
l

2
2
= h2 + l 3 + 1 2 h2 + 1 2 l 3 = 0,727

h1=62

h2=58

Exposed Surface

l2 = 62

Verification of the composite slab


15

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Simplified method (EN1994-1-2/Annex D/D.4)


For h2/h1 1,5 and h1 > 40mm

l +l
101 + 62
heff = h1 + 0,5 h2 1 2 = 62 + 0,5 58
= 85 mm
+
101
106
+
l
l

1 3
h3
h1

heff

h2
l2
l1

l3

h1 = 62 mm
h2 = 58 mm
l1 = 101 mm
l2 = 62 mm
l3 = 106 mm

Minimal effective thickness of the slab heff to satisfy the thermal insulation criteria
Standard fire
resistance

heff
[mm]

I 30
I 60
I 90
I 120
I 180
I 240

60-h3
80-h3
100-h3
120-h3
150-h3
175-h3

h3 = 0 ; heff = 85mm

I 60

Verification of the composite slab


Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Temperature evolution in the section as a function of the time

16

Verification of the composite slab


17

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

+
Calculation of the sagging moment resistance Mfi,t,Rd

Temperature distribution in the steel decking : a = b0 + b1


Concrete

Fire
resistance
[min]

60

Normal
Concrete

90

120

Part of the
Steel decking

b0
[C]

b1
[Cmm]

b2
[C/mm]

1
A
+ b 2 + b3 + b 4 2
l3
Lr
b3
[C]

b4
[C]

Lower flange

951

-1197

-2.32

86.4

-150.7

Web

661

-833

-2.96

537.7

-351.9

Upper flange

340

-3269

-2.62

1148.4

-679.8

Lower flange

1018

-839

-1.55

65.1

-108.1

Web

816

-959

-2.21

464.9

-340.2

Upper flange

618

-2786

-1.79

767.9

-472.0

Lower flange

1063

-679

-1.13

46.7

-82.8

Web

925

-949

-1.82

344.2

-267.4

Upper flange

770

-2460

-1.67

592.6

-379.0

l3

l1= 101

h3=0

h1=62

h2=58

l2 = 62

For the different parts of the steel decking, the temperatures at 60 minutes are :
Upper Flange

a = 951 1197

Web

a = 661 833

Lower Flange

a = 340 3269

1
2,32 25,6 + 86,4 0,727 150,7 0,727 2 = 863 C
106

1
2,96 25,6 + 537,7 0,727 351,9 0,7272 = 782 C
106
1
2,62 25,6 + 1148,4 0,727 679,8 0,7272 = 718 C
106

l3 = 53

Verification of the composite slab


18

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

s = c 0 + c1

Temperature of the reinforcing bar in the rib :


l3 = 53

l1 = 101

A
1
u3
+ c2 z + c3 + c 4 + c5
h2
Lr
l3

l3

1
1
1
1
=
+
+
=
z
u1
u2
u3

with

h1 = 62

1
35,8

1
35,8

1
20

z = 1,79 mm0,5

h2 = 58
u1

u2
u3

l2 = 62

u1 = 35,8mm

= 70

Concrete

Normal
Concrete

Fire resistance
[min]

c0
[C]

c1
[C]

c2
[C/mm0.5]

c3
[C/mm]

c4
[C/]

c5
[C]

60

1191

-250

-240

-5.01

1.04

-925

90

1342

-256

-235

-5.30

1.39

-1267

120

1387

-238

-227

-4.79

1.68

-1326

u2 = 35,8mm
u3 = 20mm
(axis distances)

s = 1191 250

20
1
240 1,79 5,01 25,6 + 1,04 71,4 925
= 612 C
58
106

Verification of the composite slab


19

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Bearing capacity of the different parts of the steel decking and the reinforcing bar :
Reduction
factor
ky,i [-]

Temperature
i [C]

Partial
area
Ai [cm]

fy,i,
[kN/cm]

Fi
[kN]

Lower flange

863

0,078

0,465

2,74

1,274

Web

782

0,131

0,918

4,60

4,221

Upper flange

718

0,209

0,795

7,31

5,813

Rebar in the rib

612

0,367

0,503

18,34

9,22

ky
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

[C]

Verification of the composite slab


20

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Positive moment of the composite slab


Determination of the plastic neutral axis :
zpl

Equilibrium of the horizontal forces

l3 = 53

l1 = 101

Fi = slab (l 1 + l 3 ) zpl fc

l3

z pl =

1,274 + 4,221 + 5,813 + 9,22


Fi
=
= 4,7 mm
slab (l 1 + l 3 ) fc
0,85 (101 + 106) 25 10 3

Determination of the positive moment resistance of the composite slab :


Fi
[kN]

zi
[cm]

Mi
[kNcm]

Lower flange

1,274

11,96

15,245

Web

4,221

9,10

38,410

Upper flange

5,813

6,16

35,820

Reinforcing bar in the rib

9,22

10,0

92,196

Concrete

-20,527

0,23

-4,79

for a rib width of 207mm,


Mi = 176,9 kNcm

Than, for a slab width equal to 1m,


Mfi+,Rd =

1,769
Mi
=
= 8,5 kNm / m
rib width 0,207

Verification of the composite slab


21

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Calculation of the hogging moment resistance Mfi,t,Rd


Y

The hogging moment resistance of the slab is


calculated by considering a reduced cross section
established on the basis of the isotherm for the
limit temperature lim schematised by means of 4
characteristic points.

IV
III
l3

h2

II

lim = d0 + d1 Ns + d2

A
1
+ d3 + d4
Lr
l3

Normal weight
concrete

(Ns = 26,6 kN is the normal force in the upper reinforcing bar )

Fire resistance
[min]

d0
[C]

d1
[C].N

d2
[C].mm

d3
[C]

d4
[C].mm

60

867

-1,9.10-4

-8,75

-123

-1378

90

1055

-2,2.10-4

-9,91

-154

-1990

120

1144

-2,2.10-4

-9,71

-166

-2155

lim = 867 1,9 10 4 26600 8,75 25,6 123 0,727 1378

1
= 535C
106

Verification of the composite slab


22

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Determination of the points of the isotherm :


Y

IV
III
l3

II

h2
X

The parameter z of the formula D.9 is obtained from the equation for the
determination of the temperature of the reinforcing bar, assuming that u3/h2 = 0,75
and s = lim
lim = c 0 + c1

z=

u3
A
1
+ c2 z + c3 + c 4 + c5
h2
Lr
l3

lim c 0 0,75 c1 25,6 c 3 71,4 c 4 c 5


c2

1
1
535 1191 + 0,75 250 + 25,6 5,01 71,4 1,04 + 925
106 =
106 = 1,69 mm0,5
( 240)

Verification of the composite slab


23

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Coordinates of the points of the isotherm :


The coordinates of the 4 characteristic points are determined by the following formulae :
YI = YII =

1
1

z

l 1 + l 3

YIII = h2
YIV = h2 + b

Points

0,0

10,1

II

23,7

10,1

III

42,1

58,0

IV

103,5

66,0

XI = 0

XII =

Coordinates
[mm]

with

b = l 1 sin 1
2

2 h2

= arctan

l1 l 2

1
YI
l2 +
(cos 1)
2
sin

IV
III

XIV =

1
(l1 + l 3 )
2

l3

1
1

a=

l 1 sin
z

h2

1
b
XIII =
l1
2
sin

a2 4a + c
a

II

h2
X

(
c = + 8 (1 +

)
1 + a ) si a < 8

c = 8 1 + 1 + a si a 8

Verification of the composite slab


24

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Determination of the plastic neutral axis :

IV
III
l3

h2

II

Mesh ST25

The horizontal equilibrium gives :

Temperature
i [C]

Reduction
factor
ky,i [-]

Partial
area
Ai [cm]

< lim

1,0

0,532

F
z
47
,
4
z
i tg pl
pl
0,85 fc

=> zpl = 22,35mm

[kN/cm]

Fi
[kN]

50

26,60

fy,i,

Verification of the composite slab


25

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Moment resistance of each part of the rib :


Fi [kN]

zi [cm]

Mi [kNcm]

Mesh ST25

26,60

8,9

239,01

Concrete rib

-26,60

4,5

-120,32

The negative moment resistance of the composite slab, for a rib width of 207mm is given by :

= 118,7 kNcm

Than, for a slab width equal to 1m,

fi,Rd

Mi
rib width

1,187
= 5,734 kNm / m
0,207

Verification of the composite slab


26

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Bearing capacity of the continuous slab


The applied load is :
Efi,d = Gk + 1,1 Qk,1

pfi,d = 1,0 * (0,085 + 2,03 + 1,5) + 0,6 * 4 = 6,02 kN/m

For a slab width equal to 1m, the bearing capacity may be deduced from the sagging and
hogging moment by the following relation :

2
2
2

M
+
2
M

M
fi,Rd
fi,Rd
fi,Rd
l2
l2
2 5,734 + 4 8,5 2
2
2
(
)
=
+

5
,
734
+
2

8
,
5

5
,
734
32
32

p fi,Rd =
p fi,Rd

2Mfi,Rd + 4M+fi,Rd

pfi,Rd = 9,98 kN/m

>

pfi,d = 6,02 kN/m

The continuous slab has a fire resistance of 60 minutes

Verification of the composite slab


Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Bearing capacity of the continuous slab : Simplified formula


pfi,d = 6,31 kN/m

33,4 kNm 28,4 kNm


pfi,Rd = 7,33 kN/m pfi,d = 6,31 kN/m

27

Verification of the composite slab


Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Evolution du moment flchissant en fonction du temps

28

Verification of the composite slabv


Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Evolution de la dforme en fonction du temps

29

Structure grid of the composite building


30

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Secondary composite beams


S2
1

6m
3m

3m

6m
3m

3m

6m
3m

3m

6m
3m

3m

6m
3m

3m

Bracing system

Bracing system

7m
Bracing system

14 m

S1
7m

S1

C
Bracing system

S2

S1 - S1

Verification of the composite beam


31

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Data
Composite beam on 2 supports

Gk+ Qk

Continuous slab on 3 supports


Beam span = 14m
Distance between beams = 3m

14.0 m

Required fire resistance R60

l=3

m
l=3

S355
)
0
5
(IPE4
m
4
L=1

Verification of the composite beam


32

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Geometrical characteristics and material properties


Beam :

IPE450
h = 450 mm
b = b1 = b2 = 190 mm
ew = 9,4 mm
ef = e1 = e2 = 14,6 mm
fy = 355 N/mm

beff
b2

hc

e2
h

ew
b1

Steel decking : fy = 350 N/mm


Concrete :

Connectors :

hc = 120 mm
beff = 3000 mm
C25/30
fc = 25 N/mm
fu = 450 N/mm
Number = 136
Diameter = 19 mm

hw
e1

h1
h2
l2
l1

h1 = 62 mm
l1 = 101 mm

l3

h2 = 58 mm
l2 = 62 mm l3 = 106 mm

Verification of the composite beam


33

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Geometrical characteristics and material properties


Fire protection (use of sprayed protection)

High density
spray
(vermiculite)

IPE450

Fire protection material characteristics :


Thickness : dp= 15 mm
Thermal conductivity : p= 0,12 W/(mK)
Specific heat : cp=1100 J/(kgK)
Density: p= 550 kg/m

Verification of the composite beam


Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Loads
Permanents loads:
Steel decking :

gt,k = 0,085 kN/m

Concrete :

gb,k = 2,03 kN/m

Permanent load :

gc,k = 1,5 kN/m

Self weight of the profile :

Ga,k = 0,776 kN/ml

Variable load :

qk = 4,0 kN/m

Variable load:

34

Verification of the composite beam


35

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Determination of the load level in fire situation


fi,t =

E fi,d,t
Rd

Mfi,Ed
MRd

Combination of the mechanical actions:

Ed = E Gk, j + P+ A d + (1,1 ou 2,1 )Qk,1 + 2,iQk,i


j1

if1

System considered:
Central support : reaction = 1,25 P. l

l=3

m
l=3

4
L=1

S355
)
0
5
E4
m (IP

Ffi,d = 1,25 [( gk,1 + 2,1 qk,1 ) l ] + G a,k = 1,25 [(3,62 + 0,6 4 ) 3] + 0,776 = 23,332 kN/m
Calculated moment:

Ffi,d L2

23,332 14 2
=
= 571,6 kNm
Mfi,Ed =
8
8
MRd = 1065,3 kNm (see Calculation Note)

fi,t =

571,6
= 0,537
1065,3

Verification of the composite beam


36

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Critical temperature method


Determination of the critical T

fi,t = fay, cr / fay

Table 3.2:

Reduction factors k for stress-strain relationships


of structural steel at elevated temperatures.

Steel
Temperature
a[C]

kE,

kp,

ky,

ku,

20

1,00

1,00

1,00

1,25

100

1,00

1,00

1,00

1,25

200

0,90

0,807

1,00

1,25

Resistance

300

0,80

0,613

1,00

1,25

% of the nominal value

400

0,70

0,420

1,00

500

0,60

0,360

0,78

600

0,31

0,180

0,47

700

0,13

0,075

0,23

60

800

0,09

0,050

0,11

40 Elastic
modulus kE,
20

900

0,0675

0,0375

0,06

1000

0,0450

0,0250

0,04

1100

0,0225

0,0125

0,02

1200

For R60

fay, cr
fay

= 0,537

cr = 578C

100

Effective
resistance ky,

80

300

600
900 1200
Temperature [C]

Verification of the composite beam


37

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Temperature calculation in the protected steel cross section


The increase of temperature of the various parts of the protected steel beam during the time
interval may be determined by the following equation :

p /d p
=
c a a

a,t

A p,i

V
i

1
w/10

(
)

t
e

1 t

a,t
1 + w/3 t

[(

) ]

with :
Ca

specific heat of the steel ; varying according to the steel temperature [J/(kg.K)] (3.3.1(4))

density of the steel [kg/m3] ( 3.4(1))

thermal conductivity of the fire protection material [W/mK]

dp

thickness of the fire protection material [m]

Ap,i

is the area of the inner surface of the fire protection material per unit length of the part i of the steel
member [m/m]

Vi

volume of the part i of the steel cross section per unit length [m3/m]

Ap,i /Vi

section factor of the part i of the insulated steel cross-section [m-1]

time interval (less than 5sec) [s]

c pp
w =
c aa

A p,i
d p
V
i

where

cp
p

specific heat of the fire protection material [J/kgK]


density of the fire protection material [kg/m3]

Verification of the composite beam


38

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Temperature calculation in the protected steel cross section

T lower flange T upper flange

Am/V
[m-1]

Steel temperature
after 60
[C]

Upper flange

147,5

480

Web

212,8

588

Lower flange

147,5

480

Verification of the composite beam


39

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Determination of the failure time


1200

Steel temperature [C]

1000

800

Protected IPE450
600

cr = 578C
400

200

0
0

20

40

60

80

t = 88min

100

time [min]

120

Verification of the composite beam


40

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Verification of the resistance by the moment resistance method


a,max,30

ky,

fay,

[C]

[-]

[N/mm]

Upper flange

480

0,824

292,5

Web

588

0,507

179,9

Lower flange

480

0,824

292,5

ky,
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

[C]

Verification of the composite beam


41

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Determination of the tensile force in the profile

The steel profile is subjected to a tensile force T which could be calculated by the following way

T=

fay, 1 b e f + fay, w h w e w + fay, 2 b e f


M,fi,a

= 2334,096 kN

The location of the tensile force (with regard to the bottom flange) is given by the following equation :

b e 2f
fay,1
2

yT =

h
e

+ fay,w (h w e w ) e f + w + fay,2 (b e f ) h f

2
2

= 222,6 mm
T M,fi,a

Verification of the composite beam


42

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Limitation of the tensile force


T N Pfi,Rd

with N
Pfi,Rd

is the number of connectors in the critical length of the beam


is the design shear resistance of one connector in fire
situation

Pfi,Rd = min

where

and

fu

= 0,8

'
Rd,2

= 0,29 d

M,fi,v

'
Pfi,Rd,2 = k c, PRd
,2

.d 2
450 .19 2

= 0,8

= 102 kN
4
1,0
4

'
Rd,1

'
Pfi,Rd,1 = 0,8 k u, PRd
,1

f c E cm
M,fi,v

= 0,29 1,0 19 2

25 30500
= 91kN
1,0

Verification of the composite beam


43

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Determination of the reduction factors


v (connectors) = 80% semelle = 0,8 x 480 = 384C ku, = 1,04
c (concrete) = 40% semelle = 0,4 x 480 = 192C kc, = 0,954
k
1.2
1,04
0,954

ku,

kc,

0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
192

0
0

Pfi,Rd = min

384

200

400

[C]
600

800

1000

1200

'
Pfi,Rd,1 = 0,8 k u, PRd
,1 = 0,8 1,04 102 = 84,9 kN
'
Pfi,Rd,2 = k c, PRd
,2 = 0,954 91 = 87,21kN

Limit of the tensile force is fulfilled :

T N Pfi,Rd

2334,096 kN < 68 84,9 = 5774 kN

OK

Verification of the composite beam


44

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Determination of the compressive zone of the slab


Determination of the effective thickness of the slab
Determination of the critical height

hcr60' = 50mm

Determination of the thickness of the compressive


zone of the concrete :
T
2334,096
hu =
=
= 31,12 m m
b eff fc / M,fi,c 3000 25 / 1,0

beff

hu
heff
'
h 30
cr

heff = 84,8 cm

hcr
[mm]

Temperature
[C]
30

60

535

705

10

470

642

15

415

581

20

350

525

25

300

469

30

250

421

35

210

374

40

180

327

45

160

289

50

140

250

Verification of the composite beam


45

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Determination of the moment resistance


F

hu

fc,20C / M,fi,c
hd

fay,2 / M,fi,a
fay,w / M,fi,a

fay,1 / M,fi,a

hc=heff
hcr

yF
T

Location of the force F :

yT

Mfi,Rd = T (y F y T ) = 692,4 kNm

y F h+ hc (hu / 2) = 52 cm

Verification :

Mfi,Ed
Mfi,Rd

571,6
= 0,83 < 1
692,4

The stability of the beam in fire situation is fulfilled for R60

Verification of the composite beam


46

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Verification of the shear resistance

Vpl,fi,Rd = A v

Vpl,fi,Rd = 5090

292,5
3 1,0

fay,
3 M,fi,a

= 859,5 kN > Vfi,Ed =

pl
= 163,33 kN
2

OK

Verification of the composite beam


47

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Alternative with reactive coating painted beam


TypicalIntumescentThicknessRange
8.00

7.00

6.00

5.00
R30
Thickness(mm) 4.00

R60
R90
R120

3.00

2.00

1.00

0.00
0

50

100

150

200
A/V(m1)

250

300

350

400

Verification of the composite beam


48

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

ABC calculation (Alternative AF solution without fire protection)

IPE450
416

Structure grid of the composite building


49

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Composite columns
S2
1

6m
3m

3m

6m
3m

3m

6m
3m

3m

6m
3m

3m

6m
3m

3m

Bracing system

Bracing system

7m
Bracing system

14 m

S1
7m

S1

C
Bracing system

S2

S1 - S1

Verification of the composite column


50

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Summary of data
Partially encased composite column
Height = 3,40 m
Geometrical characteristics and material properties

Profile :

HEA 260
h = 250 mm

b = 260 mm
ew = 7,5 mm
ef = 12,5 mm

ew

u2

ef

Aa = 8680 mm
fy = 460 N/mm
Concrete :

C30/37 ; fc = 30 N/mm
Ac = 53860 mm

Rebars :

4 28 ; As = 2463 mm
u1= 52mm ; u2= 60mm
fs = 500 N/mm

u1
b

Verification of the composite column


51

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

PTOTAL = 6*Ptot

Load

l=3

q1

q2
P

l=3

50
IPE4 776kN/m
0,
4m
pp=
L=1

HE260A
pp=0,682kN/m

For one level :

q1
3.4 m

IPE4
5
pp=0 0
,776
kN/

q1 = 1,25 [(3,62+0,6*4,0)*3]+0,776 = 23,351 kN/m


q2 = 0,750 [(3,62+0,6*4,0)*3]+0,776 = 14,321 kN/m
Ptot = (23,351*14/2)+ (14,321*14/2)+2*6+0,776*6+2,14*3,4 = 287,636 kN

PTOTAL = 6 * 287,636 = 1726 kN

Verification of the composite column


52

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Inertia
Profile :

Iz = 3668 cm4
Iy = 10450 cm4

Rebars :

Is,z

d 4 d2
= 4
+
4
64

Is,y

Concrete :

2
2

= 1324,6 cm 4

2
d 4 d2 h

= 4
+
u1 = 1218,9 cm 4
4 2

64

h.b3
Ic,z =
Iz Is,z = 31730 cm 4
12

b . h3
Ic,y =
Iy Is,y = 22080 cm 4
12

Verification of the composite column


53

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Use of tabulated data (0,28 < fi,t < 0,47)


Allowed parameters
R60

Existing
parameters

Fulfilled conditions
?

ew / ef > 0,5

7,5 / 12,5 = 0,6

YES

h and b > 300 mm

h = 250 mm
b = 260 mm

NO

u1 and u2 > 50 mm

u1 = 52mm
u2 = 60mm

YES

As
> 4%
Ac + As

2463
= 4,4%
538,6 + 2463

YES

Method not applicable

Verification of the composite column


54

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Simplified method : Application field


Allowed parameters
R60

Existing
parameters

Fulfilled conditions ?

l 13,5b = 13,5 . 0,26 = 3,51m

lz = ly = 0,7 . 3,4 = 2,38 m

YES

230mm h 1100mm

h = 250 mm

YES

230mm b 500

b = 260 mm

YES

1% A s /( A c + A s ) 6%

24,63/(538,6+24,63)=4,4%

YES

max R120

R60

YES

Weak axis : lz = 2,38 < 10b = 2,6

YES

Strong axis : ly = 2,38 < 10b = 2,6

YES

l limited to 10b if 230 b < 300

Method applicable

lfi=0,7L

Verification of the composite column


55

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Resistance to axial compression according to weak axis


Flanges of the profile
Mean temperature
Standard fire
resistance

o,t [C]

kt [mC]

R 30

550

9,65

R 60

680

9,55

R 90

805

6,15

R 120

900

4,65

f ,t = 0,t + k t A m / V
A m 2(h + b)
=
=15,7m 1
V
h.b
= 680 + 9,55 15,7 = 830C

with

f ,t

Plastic resistance :
N fi,pl,Rd,f = 2 (b e f f ay,f k y, )/ M,fi,a
Nfi,pl,Rd,f = 2 (260 12,5 460 0,095)/1,0 = 284,3 kN
Effective stiffness :
(EI) fi,f,z = E a,f k E, (e f b 3 )/6
(EI) fi,f,z = 210000 0,083 (12,5 2 60 3 )/6 = 640,4 kN.m 2

ky, = 0,095
kE, =0,083

% of the nominal value

100

Effective
resistance ky,

80
60
40 Elastic
modulus kE,
20
0

300

600
900 1200
Temperature [C]

Verification of the composite column


56

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Web of the profile


Reduced height of web :

h w,fi = 0,5 (h 2 e f ) 1 1 0,16 (H t / h)

hw,fi

h w,fi = 0,5 (250 2 12,5) 1 1 0,16(770/2 50) = 32,4 mm


Standard fire resistance

Ht [mm]

R 30

350

R 60

770

R 90

1100

R 120

1250

hw,fi

Level of maximum stress : f ay,w,t = f ay,w 1 (0,16H t /h)


fay,w,t = 460 1 (0,16 770 /250) = 327,6 MPa

Plastic resistance :

N fi,pl,Rd,w = e w (h 2e f 2h w,fi )f ay,w,t / M,fi,a

Nfi,pl,Rd,w = (7,5(250 2 12,5 2 32,4)327,6 )/1,0 = 393,7 kN


Effective stiffness :

[
]
= (210000 (250 2 12,5 2 32,4 )7,5 )/12 = 1,18 kN.m

(EI) fi,w,z = E a,w (h 2e f 2h w,fi )e 3w /12


(EI) fi,w,z

Verification of the composite column


57

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Concrete
bc,fi

Reduced thickness of concrete : bc,fi


Standard fire
resistance

bc,fi [mm]

R30

4,0

R60

15,0

R90

0,5(Am/V)+22,5

R120

2,0(Am/V)+24,0

R30

R60

bc,fi

R90

R120

Am/V
[m-1]

c,t
[C]

Am/V
[m-1]

c,t
[C]

Am/V
[m-1]

c,t
[C]

Am/V
[m-1]

c,t
[C]

136

214

256

265

23

300

300

300

300

46

400

21

400

13

400

400

---

---

50

600

33

600

23

600

---

---

---

---

54

800

38

800

---

---

---

---

---

---

41

900

---

---

---

---

---

---

43

1000

Am/V = 15,7m-1 Average temperature in the concrete c,t = 356C

Verification of the composite column


58

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

kc,

kc,=0,79

c,t = 356C

0.79 0.8

Secant modulus of concrete :


E c,sec, =
E c,sec, =

f c,
cu,

0.6

f c .k c,

0.4

cu,

0.2

30 0,79
= 2746,4 MPa
8,68 10 3

0
0

200

400

600

800

1200

1000

356

[C]

Plastic resistance :
Nfi,pl,Rd,c = 0,86{(h 2e f 2b c,fi )(b e w 2b c,fi ) A s } fc, / M,fi,c
Nfi,pl,Rd,c = 0,86 {(250 2 12,5 2 15 )(260 7,5 2 15 ) 2463} 25 0,79/1,0 = 839 kN
Effective stiffness :

[{
(
) } ]
= 2746,4[{(250 2 12,5 2 15 )((260 2 15 ) 7,5 )/12} 1324,6 10 ] = 509,5kN m

(EI) fi,c,z = E c,sec, (h 2e f 2b c,fi )(b 2b c,fi ) 3 e 3w /12 Is,z


(EI) fi,c,z

Verification of the composite column


59

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Reinforcing bars
u2

Reduction factor for yield strength : ky,t


u [mm]

Standard fire
resistance

40

45

50

55

60

R30

R60

0,789

0,883

0,9763

R90

0,314

0,434

0,572

0,696

0,822

R120

0,170

0,223

0,288

0,367

0,436

u1

Reduction factor for Young modulus : kE,t


u [mm]

Standard fire
resistance

40

45

50

55

60

R30

0,830

0,865

0,88

0,914

0,935

R60

0,604

0,647

0,689

0,729

0,763

R90

0,193

0,283

0,406

0,522

0,619

R120

0,110

0,128

0,173

0,233

0,285

u = u1 u 2 = 52 60 = 55,86 mm

Plastic resistance : Nfi,pl,Rd,s = A s k y,t fs,y / M,fi,s


Nfi,pl,Rd,s = 2463 1,0 500 / 1,0 = 1231,5 kN
Effective stiffness : (EI) fi,s,z = k E,t E s Is,z
(EI) fi,s,z = 0,735 210000 1218,9 10 4 = 1881,4 kN. m 2

Verification of the composite column


60

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Plastic resistance of the composite section


Nfi,pl,Rd = Nfi,pl,Rd,f + Nfi,pl,Rd,w + Nfi,pl,Rd,c + Nfi,pl,Rd,s
Nfi,pl,Rd = 284,3 + 393,7 + 839 + 1231,5 = 2748 kN

Effective stiffness of the composite section


(EI) fi,eff,z = f, (EI) fi,f,z + w, (EI) fi,w,z + c, (EI) fi,c,z + s, (EI) fi,s,z
Standard fire
resistance

f,

w,

c,

s,

R30

1,0

1,0

0,8

1,0

R60

0,9

1,0

0,8

0,9

R90

0,8

1,0

0,8

0,8

R120

1,0

1,0

0,8

1,0

(EI) fi,eff,z = 0,9 640,4 + 1,0 1,18 + 0,8 509,5 + 0,9 1881,4 = 2678,4 kN. m 2

Verification of the composite column


Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Determination of the axial buckling load at elevated temperatures


Euler buckling load :
Nfi,cr,z =

2 (EI) fi,eff,z
l

2
z

with l z = 2,38 m

2 2678,4
Nfi,cr,z =
= 4667 kN
2,38 2

Slenderness ratio :
=

Nfi,pl,R
Nfi,cr,z

2748
= 0,767
4667

c c urve z = 0,683

Axial buckling resistance :

Nfi,Rd,z = z Nfi,pl,Rd
Nfi,Rd,z = 0,683 2748 = 1876 kN > Nfi,Rd = 1726kN

61

Verification of the composite column


62

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

Resistance to axial compression according to strong axis


Same method as for weak axis, excepted of the inertia !
Plastic resistance of the composite section
Nfi,pl,Rd = Nfi,pl,Rd,f + Nfi,pl,Rd,w + Nfi,pl,Rd,c + Nfi,pl,Rd,s = 2748 kN

Effective stiffness of the composite section


(EI) fi,eff,y = f, (EI) fi,f,y + w, (EI) fi,w,y + c, (EI) fi,c,y + s, (EI) fi,s,y = 4097,1kN. m 2

Euler buckling load

Slenderness ratio

Axial buckling resistance

Nfi,cr,y =
=

2 (EI) fi,eff,y

Nfi,pl,R
Nfi,cr,y

2
y

= 7138,8 kN

= 0,62

Nfi,Rd,y = y .Nfi,pl,Rd = 2124,8 kN > Nfi,Rd = 1726kN

Verification of the composite column


63

Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 27-28 November 2012

A3C calculation (Alternative solution : Fully encased HEB160)

Tabulated data
c

HEB160
c

412

Standard Fire Resistance

hc
us
bc

1.1
1.2
1.3

bc = 280

us

Minimum dimensions hc and bc [mm]


minimum concrete cover of steel section c [mm]
minimum axis distance of reinforcing bars us [mm]

R30

R60

R90

R120

R180

R240

150
40
20*

180
50
30

220
50
30

300
75
40

350
75
50

400
75
50

200
40
20*

250
40
20*

350
50
30

400
60
40

or
2.1
2.2
2.3

us = 42

hc = 280

c = 60

Minimum dimensions hc and bc [mm]


minimum concrete cover of steel section c [mm]
minimum axis distance of reinforcing bars us [mm]

Table 4.4: Minimum cross-sectional dimensions, minimum concrete cover of the steel section and minimum axis
distance of the reinforcing bars, of composite columns made of totally encased steel sections.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi