CASES IN TAX 1 AND TAX 2

1. planters v fertiphil mar 14, 2008

2. PAL v EDU 164 scra 320
3. Phil Health Care v CIR
4. Smith, Bell v Commissioner july 29, 1975
5. ABAKADA v Purisima 562 scra 251
6. Pascual v Sec of Public works
7. CIR v Robertson aug 12 1986
8. Gotamco
9. Mitsubishi
10.CREBA v Exec sec
11.carlos superdrug v DSWD june 19 2007
12.Fernandez 99 phil 934
13.Churchill v rafferty
14.matalin coconut v Mun council
15.chavez v ongpin june 6 1990
16.reyes v almanzor apr 26 1991
1. sison v ancheta 130 scra 654
2. manila race horse trainers 88 phil 60
3. assn. of customs brokers v Municipal board 93 ohil 107
4. gomez v palomar 25 scra 827
5. ormoc sugar central v treasurer feb 17, 1968
6. shell v vano 94 phil 387
7. American bible society 101 phil 386
8. tolentino v sec of finance 235 scra 630
9. philam life v auditor jan 18 1968
10.Casanovas v hord
11.cepalco v CIR sept 25, 1985
12.mactan cebu intl airport v Marcos 261 scra 667
13.abbra valley college v Aquino 162 scra 106
14.Herrera v quezon city 3 scra 186
15.province of abra v hernando aug 3, 1981
16.roman catholic bishop of nueva Segovia v provl board of ilocos 51 phil 352
1. lung center v quezon city june 29, 2004
2. CIR v YMCA oct 14, 1998
3. CIR v CTA
4. prov of batangas v romulp 429 scra 81
5. city of manila v coca cola bottlers aug 4, 2009
6. republic v mambulao lumber sept 5, 1985
7. domingo v garlitos 8 scra 443
8. francia v IAC 162 scra 753
9. Philex Mining aug 28 1998
10.vera et al v Fernandez et al mar 30 1979
11.CIR v Acesite hotel feb 16, 2007
12.CIR v Ateneo Apr 18 1997
13.CIR v Toda 438 scra 290
14.Maceda v Macaraig may 31 1991

15.silkair v CIR feb 6, 2008

16.CTA v Javier 199 scra 824
1. tour specialist 183 scra 824
2. US v Sullivan
3. Eisner v macomber 252 US 189
4. CIR v boac apr 30 1987
5. south African airways
6. algue v CIR
7. philiex mining v comm apr 16 2008
8. duterte v Rallos
9. gatchalian v Cir
10.reyes v CIR
11.evangelista v CIR 102 phil 140
12.pascual case
13.obillos case
14.ona v CIR
15.CIR v pajonar
16.SM prime holdings v Cir CTA case 7079, 2006
1. Diaz and timbol v Sec of finance july 19 2011
2. CIR v Phil Health Care apr 24 2007
3. CIR v fort bonifacio 2009
4. Geotina v CTA 1971
5. petron v tiangco apr 1, 2008
6. FPIC v CA 1998
7. prov of bulacan v CA
8. Kepco Ilijan v Makati City
9. Yamane v BA lepanto oct 25 2005
10.ericsson v city of pasig nov 22 2007
11.mindanao bus company v city assessor of Cagayan de oro
12.Caltex phils v CBAA of pasay
13.board of assessment appeals v MERALCo
14.MERALCO v CBAA
15.Fels energy v Prov of Batangas feb 16, 2007
16.Manila Intl airport authority v City of Pasay apr 2, 1009
1. Board of Assessment appeals of zamboanga del sur v samar mining
2. LRTA v CBAA
3. PPA v City of Iloilo
4. City assessor of cebu v assn. of benevola de cebu june 8 2007
5. NAPOCOR v CBAA jan 30 2009
6. Provl assessor of marinduque v CA apr 30 2009
7. CIR v Primetime property aug 28 2007
8. CIR v FMF devt corp june 30 2008
9. Wyeth-Suaco
10.CIR v Phil Global Communications 2006
11.RCBC v CIR
12.central azucarera don pedro
13.gibbs v collector

14.CIR v Luzon drug

15.Cagayan valley drug v CIR 2008
16.filinvest devt corp v CIR aug 9 2007
1. banco Filipino savings 2007
2. Illuh Asaali case
3. coca cola v manila june 27 2006