Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Table of contents
Introduction
--------------------------------------------------------------2
Introduction
Another method in to lay out a simple curve is the use of two theodolites
using double-deflection angle. Like field work 1, we used incremental chord
and deflection angle method to locate the points along the curve but this
time, we are going to use double-deflection angle method with almost the
same procedure to lay-out the curve but we are going to measure the
incremental chord and compare it to the computed value and get the percent
error. This method involves setting up theodolite on station PC and also at
station PT where the point at which the two instruments will meet with the
same deflection angle would be the location of the points along the curve.
Objectives:
2
Instruments:
A theodolite is a precision
instrument used for
measuring angles both
horizontally and vertically.
Theodolites can rotate along
their horizontal axis as well
as their vertical axis.
Tape
Used to measure horizontal
distances as well as slopes. Usually
in 30m, 50m or 100m in length.
Marking pins
2 range poles
Straight round stalks, 3 to 4 cm thick
and about 2 m long. They are made
of wood or metal. They are used to
mark areas and to set out straight lines
on the field. They are also used to
mark
points which must be seen from a
distance, in which case a flag may be
attached to improve the visibility.
Procedures:
1. The professor gives the following datas:
d1=
3
D=
d2=
Location of PC on the site (Note: Location and not station is given
since d1 and d2 are given)
Azimuth of the back tangent (PC to V)=
Adopt Full Chord Length= (preferably 2m to 5m)
GIVEN
d1
. (Note that the first isntruments reading is referred
2
( )
from the back tangent while the second instrument reading is referred
from the long chord.)
4. The next intermediate point B may be located on the ground using the
same procedure as in step 8, but this time use a reading equal to
d 1 +2 D
.
2
5. The third intermediate point C may also be found following the same
process, but now use a reading in the horizontal vernier equal to
( d +22 D ) .
1
Error=
Group No.: 4
Time: 12pm-4:30pm
Weather: Sunny
Data Supplied:
d1= 3.22
D= 6
d2= 0.78
Location of PC on the site (Note location and not station is now given since d 1
and d2 are given)
Adopt Full chord length of 2m (Preferably 2m to 5m)
Given:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
OCC. BY
1ST Inst.
PC
PC
PC
PC
PC
PC
PC
PC
PC
PC
CHORD
COMPUTE
ACTUAL
D
1.07
1.73
2
1.1
2
2.1
2
2.2
2
1.85
2
1.85
2
2.15
2
1.84
2
2.21
0.26
0.34
DEFLECTIO
N ANGLE
%
ERROR
1.61
4.61
7.61
10.61
13.61
16.61
19.61
22.61
25.61
28.61
61%
45%
5%
10%
7.5%
7.5%
7.5%
8%
10.5%
30%
Computation:
I =3.22+ ( 86 ) +0.78=52
1
R=
=19.11 m
sin 3
52
C=2 (19.11 ) sin
=16.75 m
2
( )
( 3.222 )=1.07 m
0.78
c =2 ( 19.11 ) sin (
=0.26 m
2 )
c 1=2 ( 19.11 ) sin
2
Deflection Angles:
d 1 3.22
=
=1.61
2
2
d 1+ D
=4.61
2
d 1+2 D
=7.61
2
d 1+3 D
=10.61
2
d 1+ 4 D
=13.61
2
d 1+5 D
=16.61
2
d 1+6 D
=19.61
2
d 1+7 D
=22.61
2
d 1+8 D
=25.61
2
d 1+ 9 D
=28.61
2
10
Percentage Error
error PT A=
|1.071.73|
x 100 =61
1.07
|21.1|
error A B=
x 100 =45
2
|22.1|
error B C=
x 100 =5
2
|22.2|
error C D=
x 100 =10
2
|21.85|
error D E=
x 100 =7.5
2
|21.85|
error E F=
x 100 =7.5
2
|22.15|
error F G=
x 100 =7.5
2
|21.84|
error G H =
x 100 =8
2
|22.21|
error H I =
x 100 =10.5
2
|0.260.34|
error I PT =
x 100 =30
0.26
Pictures:
Setting the
instruments at
stations PC and PT.
Measuring the
incremental
chords.
chord.
I=a+b
K = 180 - 1
AV =
AB sin b
sin K
BV =
AB sin b
sin K
PI = Sta A +AV
after the obstacle has been removed, place the instrument at point Y,
back sight point Q, lay off a 90-degree angle and a distance from Y to
PC equal to line PW and QS. Carefully set reference points for points Q,
S, Y, and W to insure points are available to set the PC after clearing
and construction have begun.
Inaccessible PT
When the PT is
inaccessible and both the
PI and PC are readily
accessible, the surveyor
must establish an offset
station at the PT using the
method for inaccessible
PC with the following
exceptions:
1. Letter the curve so that
the point A is at the PT
instead of the PC.
2. Lay the curve in as far
as possible from the PC
instead of the PT.
3. Angle d, is the angle at
the center of the curve between point P and PT, which is equal to
two times the difference between the deflection at P and one half of
I. follow the steps for inaccessible PC to set line PQ and QS. Note
that the station at point S equals the computed station value of PT
plus YQ.
4. Use station S to number the stations of the alignment ahead.
Conclusion:
This method consists in setting up a theodolite at each tangent point and
working out the deflection angles from the tangents. The theodolites are
then set to read corresponding deflection angles and points set out to lie on
both lines of sight. This method is most convenient when the ground is
undulating, rough and not suitable for linear measurements compared on the
first two methods we have used in laying out the curve. Hence, it more
accurate because you will rely on the intersection of the sights of the two
instruments which is based on the principle that the angle between the
tangent and the chord is equal to the angle subtended by the chord in the
opposite segment. Their sight of intersection would be the locations of the
points along the curve. Since this method is good to use for inaccessible or
uneven grounds, there would be less errors in terms of using tape because
all the angles are calculated. Setting up station PT should be accurate
because if not, there would be huge source of error like we have done in our
field work. The distance from PC to PT that was computed from the given
should at least be laid out precisely because the distances of the incremental
chord would be affected by the reading of the angles form both stations. The
longer the distances of error the PT was laid out from PC, the shorter the
incremental chord you would get from the computed distance and the
shorter the distance of PC to PT from the computed distance, the longer the
distance of incremental chord you would get. In our case, after we have laid
out the curve, we double checked the distance of PC to PT and we noticed
that we have laid out station PT 0.5 meters shorter than the computed and
that is the source of our error. Other than that, other measurements were
closed enough from the computed distances.