Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Living Conditions of
Tea Plantation Workers
Sharit K Bhowmik
EPW
The employers associations in the plantations are unhappy not merely because
they need to pay more to their workers
but they are worried about the effect of
this strike on plantations in the other
tea-growing states, namely Tamil Nadu,
West Bengal and Assam. The wage rates
of the two eastern states (Assam and
West Bengal) are the lowest in the country and they would not even be subsistence wages for workers in informal
employment. These two states produce
75% of the countrys tea and engage
around the same proportion of permanent
workers. Daily wages in West Bengal are
Rs 122.50 and in Assam the state government has set the minimum wage at
Rs 146 per day. Permanent workers in tea
plantations number over one million,
vol l nos 46 & 47
hills originate from Nepal. Their forefathers had migrated to the plantations in
search of better life but in reality, as earlier reports show, it was a move from the
frying pan to the fire.
The Dooars Enquiry Committee of
1911 found that housing and water supply
were generally very poor. There was
inadequate space for housing and plinths
were not provided. The Royal Commission on Labour, 1931 also levelled the
same charge. R G Griffin, Special Officer
for Hookworms in Mines and Tea Plantations in Bengal, made the following
observation in 1920:
Ordinary thatched or some tin roof huts are
provided. They are generally overcrowded
owing to insufficiency of accommodation in
comparison with the number of people living in them. The houses are not laid out with
any idea as to utilising sunlight for drying
the immediate surroundings and plinths do
not exist or are insufficient. In many cases
where water is scarce and deep wells have to
be sunk, labour tends to become congested,
as coolies houses are congregated in the
immediate neighbourhood.
EPW
owned by Tata Plantations converted itself into Amalgamated Plantations Private Limited (APPL). The idea was to
make workers of the tea gardens (controlled by the company) as major shareholders of the company. Tata invited the
International Finance Corporation (IFC)
of the World Bank to be a partner. APPL
owns 24 plantations in Assam and West
Bengal while its South Indian counterpart is Kanan Devan with 17 tea plantations. Tata Global Beverages controls
28.52% of the shares of Kanan Devan
which has now become an associate
company of Tata Global Beverages (Dutt
2013). IFC owns 20% of the shares in both
companies while Tata Global Beverages
has 49.66% shares in APPL. The rest are
owned by the workers of the plantations.
Though workers have purchased shares,
or they were forced to purchase them by
the company, they have no control over
the plantations nor do they have any say
in their management.
A report on APPL published by the
Columbia Law School Human Rights
Institute in 2013 exposes the hoax of
ownership.3 The workers have no control
over the company and their living and
working conditions are no different from
the other plantation workers. In short
pathetic. APPL proudly claims that the
scheme of worker-ownership was introduced by Tata as a voluntary measure and
it has been totally successful. But the report has a different story. The plantation
managers forced workers to buy shares.
They had to put their thumb impression
on the agreement paper (since most are
illiterate) and later Rs 4550 was deducted
from their wages every month to pay for
the value of the shares. When workers in
one of the tea plantations protested,
they were warned by the manager that
he would declare a lockout and they
would lose their wages. In another case,
the officials turned off the weighing machine when workers went to weigh the
leaves they had plucked. They were told
that their leaves would be weighed only
after they put their thumb impression on
the share applications.
The Columbia Law School report provides details of the living conditions of
the workers in 15 of the plantations. The
toilets were unusable as they were never
Economic & Political Weekly
EPW
Congress (INTUC) and has had a reputation of being soft on employers. Kerala
too faced similar problems but the
women workers decided to act on their
own and they achieved positive results.
The other point is that the state government too has taken a positive view of the
workers problems. In the case of West
Bengal, the state governments (in the
past and present) did not even consider
seriously the problems faced by workers
who were systematically deprived of the
rights. The governments tried to deny
that there were deaths due to starvation
or that there were cases of malnutrition.
In fact, they celebrated the paltry increases in wages as landmark developments. The poor educational facilities
ensure that the only future workers and
the children have is of unskilled labour.
The workers and their families in the
tea plantations of Assam are in some
ways worse off than the others. The permanent workers number a little more
than 5,00,000 and the total population
of these workers would easily be five
times more. The tea plantation workers
in West Bengal are a part of the Scheduled Tribes (ST) but in Assam the people
References
Bhowmik, Sharit (1980): Class Formation in the
Plantation System (New Delhi: Peoples Publishing House).
(2015): Wages of Tea Plantation Workers,
EPW, 9 May.
Bhowmik, Sharit, V Xaxa and M A Kalam (1996):
Tea Plantation Labour in India (New Delhi:
Friedrich Ebert Foundation).
Chaudhuri, Mohuya (2015): Tea Gardens in the
East Are Brewing Starvation, Malnutrition,
The Wire, http://thewire.in/2015/07/30/teagardens-in-the-east-are-brewing-starvation-malnutrition-7571/, accessed on 31 July 2015.
Columbia Law School Human Rights Institute (2013):
The More Things Change The World Bank, Tata
and Enduring Abuses on Indias Tea Plantations
(New York: The World Bank).
Dutt, Ishita Ayan (2013): Tata Global Buys 10.59%
More in Kanan Devan, Business Standard,New
Delhi,6 July.
Padmini Swaminathan
The notion of work and employment for women is complex. In India, fewer women participate in employment compared
to men. While economic factors determine mens participation in employment, womens participation depends on
diverse reasons and is often rooted in a complex interplay of economic, cultural, social and personal factors.
The introduction talks of the oppression faced by wage-earning women due to patriarchal norms and capitalist relations
of production, while demonstrating how policies and programmes based on national income accounts and labour force
surveys seriously disadvantage women.
This volume analyses the concept of work, the economic contribution of women, and the consequences of gendering
of work, while focusing on women engaged in varied work in different parts of India, living and working in dismal
conditions, and earning paltry incomes.
Authors:
Maithreyi Krishnaraj Maria Mies Bina Agarwal Prem Chowdhry Ujvala Rajadhyaksha, Swati Smita Joan P Mencher, K Saradamoni Devaki
Jain Indira Hirway Deepita Chakravarty, Ishita Chakravarty Uma Kothari J Jeyaranjan, Padmini Swaminathan Meena Gopal Millie Nihila
Forum against Oppression of Women Srilatha Batliwala Miriam Sharma, Urmila Vanjani J Jeyaranjan
www.orientblackswan.com
MumbaiChennaiNew DelhiKolkataBangaloreBhubaneshwarErnakulamGuwahatiJaipurLucknowPatnaChandigarhHyderabad
Contact: info@orientblackswan.com
32
NOVEMBER 21, 2015 vol l nos 46 & 47 EPW Economic & Political Weekly