HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION - RATING OF RISKS THE PROJECT- RBS

CODE FGPR-012
version 1.0
DRAFT
PREPARED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
APPROVED BY:

Automation of Area from Evaporation Y Clarification from Syrup

Factory Sugar / DULCECITO
Jorge Alvarado Quintana DATE 26 03
Head Instrumentation and
Automation
Adriano Goicochea Cornejo - Head of
DATE 27 03
Division Energy.
Humberto Lozada
DATE 28 03
Mendizabal Superintendent Factory

2009
2009
2009

NOTE: List all the project risks identified in each category. Keep this information for your reference
through process management risk:

Technical risks, quality or performance (eg reliance on unproven or complex technology,

unrealistic performance goals, changes in the technology used or industry standards for the draft.)
1. Do not tell with the enough experience for he protocol PROFIBUS DP from the Platform
PCS7.
2. Specifications techniques of service from programming Y mounting electric very General.
3. Do not tell with controllers from High technology he which is changing very quickly in he
time.
Four. Ignorance of Record contractual from the sub-contractors for he service from
programming and mounting electric.
Risk management projects (eg insufficient allocation of time and / or resources, inadequate
quality of the project plan, poor use of the disciplines of project management).
1. Fullness of time Programmed.
2. Possibility from not counting with suitable or timely judgment from experts.
3. Quality of Deliverable do not satisfies all the aspects for the generation from a document
base.
Organizational risks (eg cost, time, scope and objectives are internally inconsistent, lack of
prioritization of projects, inadequacy or interruption of funding and resource conflicts with other
projects in the organization.)
1. Availability of funds for execution.
2. Inadequate understanding by part of equipment and the subcontractors, by custom from
verbal cues.
3. Interruption of financing of draft for prioritize others projects.
External risks (eg changes in laws or regulatory environment, forms of work, changing
owner priorities, country risk, climate, etc.The risks of natural disasters such as earthquakes,
floods, and manifestations generally require actions disaster recovery management more
risk.)
1. Exchange Policy Government
2. Strikes, strikes nations than affect to the stakeholders Y the rest equipment.
3. Change from Authorities Y define new flow for him Order from start of Draft.

HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION - ANALYSIS SWOT

CODE FGPR-013
version 1.0
DRAFT
Automation of area from Evaporation Y Clarification from Syrup Factory of Sugar / DULCECITO "
PREPARED BY:
Jorge Alvarado Quintana - Head
DATE 01 04 2009
Instrumentation and Automation
REVIEWED BY:
Adriano Goicochea Cornejo - Head
DATE 02 04 2009
of Division Energy.
APPROVED BY:
Humberto Lozada
DATE 03 04 2009
Mendizabal - Superintendent
Factory
Facilitator of Analysis SWOT: George Alvarado Quintana - Boss from
Instrumentation and Automation.
Participants: Team draft
Date Analysis SWOT: April 1, 2009
Strengths: (what potential strengths are about the project, the project team, sponsor, the
structure from organization, he customer, he timetable of draft, he budget project, the project's
product, etc.?)
1. Exists great experience in jobs Similar from projects from automation, even
exist several projects posts in March in other Business of Group.
2. Excellent synergy between the members of equipment of draft, with a great
vocation and service provision from make he draft with professionalism.
3.
The Policies from job than has he Group in he Area from Resource Humans, They
are all right solid.
Four. There is a great receptivity of the project by the Group on the issues of
investment and improvement keep going.
Weaknesses: (What potential weaknesses exist about the project, the project team, sponsor,
the structure from organization, he customer, he timetable of draft, he budget project, the
product of the project, etc.?)
1. He time from dedication to the draft by part from the members of equipment of
draft, he has been diminished by the characteristics of each professional
laborare.This has prevented coordination meetings are more continuous, which has
involved more effort by part from each member of equipment of draft.
2. Low level from catering from materials Electric due to much demand from Similar
projects automation.
3.
For the Finnish of draft are account with a reservation from contingency Y
management limited.
Opportunities: (Than opportunities potential exist about of draft, the requirements of the project,
the requirements of product, he timetable of draft, the means, the quality, etc.?)
1. He Contents of Risk - Country are find in a point optimum, the which encourages
the private investment.
2. Automating this project will be taken into account as a basic document for the
various Group companies, and will develop updates that will increase its utility.
3.
The different alternatives from supplies from materials electric.

Threats: (what potential hazards exist about the project, project requirements, the
requirements of product, he timetable of draft, the means, the quality, etc.?)
1.
Than he personal highly trained can be grasped by other companies.
2. Do not fulfillment of contract from from the Business contractors from
service programming and assembly electric.

HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION - STORM IDEAS

DRAFT
PREPARED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
APPROVED BY:
Facilitator the
session:

CODE FGPR-014
version 1.0
Automation of Area from Evaporation Y Clarification from Syrup Factory Sugar / DULCECITO
Jorge Alvarado Quintana DATE 05 04 2009
Head Instrumentation and
Automation
Adriano Goicochea Cornejo - Head of
DATE 06 04 2009
Division Energy.
Mendizabal Humberto Lozada DATE 07 04 2009
Superintendent Factory
Jorge Alvarado Quintana

Position:
Group Participant:

Head of Instrumentation and Automation

Boss from Evaporation, Boss from Workshop Electric, Assistant
from Purchases, Head of Instrumentation.

Location:

Cartavio - Santiago Cao

Deliverable:

3.1.3 Hardware and System Software Client / Server

Identified risk
(metalanguage)

Because the supplier

fails to comply with
the equipment
Boards, it would not
be ready, which would
mean a delay in the
delivery schedule.

Probability
of
Occurrence

Half

Degree
of
Impact

High

Actions proposals

Set in the
contract a
clause penalty
for noncompliance
with the date
delivery.

I
Identified
by?

Jorge
Alvarado
Quintana

Having made the

failure of analog input
modules, measuring
field instrumentation
would accuracy
errors, implying that
monitoring of these
process variables are
not real.

Half

High

Staff
instrumentation
system
maintainer
must be
present in the
FAT, before
being sent
equipment to
plant facilities.

Kiran Rios
Macedo

Deliverable:
3.2.1 Service Programming
Risk Identified

Because the service

provider fails to comply
with the programming
of the application of the
system supervision
screens would not be
ready, leading to a
delay of this
deliverable.
When there is a power
outage in the control
room operator stations,
there is a possibility of
deleted software
application, this would
reprogram the system
to a new cost to the
draft.

Probability
Idea

Half

High

Degree
of
Impact

High

High

Actions proposals

I
Identified
by?

Set in the contract

a clause of penalty
for nonJorge
compliance on the Alvarado
date of service
Quintana
delivery.

Having a UPS
system with
battery bank 30
minutes of battery
to prevent any
fluctuation of
power outages
plant.

Carlos
Moya
Charcape

Deliverable:
3.2.2 Installation Service Electric
Risk Identified

Because the service

provider fails to comply
with electrical
installation, equipment
and would not be ready
interconnected boards,
this would delay the
arrival of the technician
to perform the sgte
Brazil. deliverable
(programming service)
Inadequate protection
of electrical cables can
cause signal distortion
due to harmonics in the
evaporation area, this
would imply control
failures in control
responses system.

Probability
Idea

Half

Average

Degree
of
Impact

High

High

Actions proposals

I
Identified
by?

Set in the
provider's contract
a clause of penalty
Carlos
for nonMoya
compliance on the
Charcape
date of service
delivery.

Declare the
provider's
contract the
technical
specifications of
the supply of
electrical
equipment, which
comply with the
noise protection
and harmonics.

Jorge
Alvarado
Quintana.

RESPONSE PLAN
RISKS
CODE FGPR-015

version 1.0

Prioritized risk No. 1

Description ML

Time

Quality

Scope

The equipment is not ready Panels.

Due to than he provider breach with he equipment from Boards.

Cause
Probabilit Half
y
To transfer
Strategy
Actions drink

Set in the contract a clause

penalty non-compliance with
the date delivery

Residua
l Risks

Affect Cost

Pr 0.50

Impact

high

Priority (Chance x
Imp)

Owner
Responsibl Triggers
e
Jorge
Alvarado
Quintana

Go 0.40

Pr * Go 0.20

0.20

Cost
S /. 35,000.00

Risks
Side

Despite the penalty applied, It is in breach.

Ps = 0.90
Is = 0.80

Continge
ncy Plan

Have ready other providers.

Reserve (10% of total cost of risk initial).

Prioritized risk No. 2

Description ML

Time

Quality

Scope

The measurement from the instrumentation from country would errors from accuracy
To the have glitch from factory the modules from entry Analog

Cause
Probabilit Half
y
Avoid
Strategy
Actions drink

Instrumentation personnel
maintainer of the system,
must be present in the FAT
before be

Residua
l Risks

Affect Cost

Pr 0.7

Impact

high

Priority (Chance x
Imp)

Owner
Responsibl Triggers
e
Kiran Rios
Macedo

Go 0.80

Pr * Go 0.72

Risks
Side

He personal from instrumentation I quit then for further

testing FAT

Continge
ncy Plan

The testing FAT should made so much in Lime Y in Facilities

from the Plant to others Technical (2 testing).

0.20

Cost
S / 100 thousand

Ps = 0.30
Is = 0.10

Prioritized risk No. 3

Description ML

Affect Cost

Time

Quality

Scope

Monitoring screens would not be lists.

Due to than he provider breach with he service Programming of application of system.

Cause
Probabilit Half
y
To transfer
Strategy
Actions drink

Impact

Pr 0.50

high

Priority (Chance x
Imp)

Owner
Responsibl Triggers
e

Set in the contract a clause

Jorge
penalty the non-compliance in Alvarado
the delivery date service.
Quintana

Residua
l Risks

Go 0.40

0.20

Cost

S /. 35,000.00

Pr * Go 0.20

Risks
Side

Despite the penalty applied, It is in breach.

Ps = 0.90
Is = 0.80

Continge
ncy Plan

Have ready other providers.

Reserve (10% of total cost of risk initial).

Prioritized risk No. 4

Description ML

Cause
Probabilit

Affect Cost

Time

Quality

Scope

The possibility from deleted he software of application.

To the exist a cut from power inside of the Hall from control from the seasons from operation
0.90

Impact

0.80

Priority (Chance x

0.72

y
Avoid
Strategy
Actions drink
Having a UPS system with
battery bank 30 minutes
autonomy to prevent any
fluctuation of power outages
plant.

Residua
l Risks

Pr 0.90

Imp)
Owner
Responsibl Triggers
e
Carlos Moya
Charcape

Go 0.80

Pr * Go 0.72

Cost
S /. 15,000.00

Risks
Side

The burn protection system UPS

Ps = 0.30
Is = 0.10

Continge
ncy Plan

Having an alternate system protection UPS and

automatic.

Reservation S / 20,000.00

Prioritized risk No. 5

Description ML

Cause
Probabilit
y
Strategy

Affect Cost

Time

Quality

Scope

He equipment Y the boards do not would interconnected Y ready.

Due to than he provider breach with he service from mounting electric
Half

Impact

To transfer

Owner

high

Priority (Chance x
Imp)

0.20

Actions drink

Responsibl Triggers
e

Set in the contract a clause

Jorge
penalty the non-compliance in Alvarado
the delivery date service.
Quintana

Residua
l Risks

Pr 0.50

Go 0.40

Cost

S /. 25,000.00

Pr * Go 0.20

Risks
Side

Despite the penalty applied, It is in breach.

Ps = 0.90
Is = 0.80

Continge
ncy Plan

Have ready other providers.

Reserve (10% of total cost of risk initial).

Prioritized risk No. 6

Description ML

Affect Cost

Time

Quality

Scope

Produce distortions in the signals due to the Harmonic in he area from evaporation
The inadequate protection from the wires Electric

Cause
Probabilit 0.50
y
Avoid
Strategy
Actions drink

Impact

0.40

Priority (Chance x
Imp)

Owner
Responsibl Triggers
e

Cost

0.20

Declare the provider's

contract the technical
specifications of the supply of
electrical equipment, which
comply with the noise
protection and harmonics.

Residua
l Risks
Secondar
y risks
Continge
ncy Plan

Pr 0.50

Go 0.40

S /. 15,000.00

Pr * Go 0.20

Despite having good protection from noise and

harmonics, he travel of cabling pass in cables parallel
to high tension.
Avoid tours by High tension from the wires from electrical
signal medium and low tension.

Ps = 0.30
Is = 0.10
Reservation S / 10,000.00