Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
SUPERVISED BY:
Dr. Shah Muhammad
(Associate Professor)
SUBMITTED BY:
SLAM STUDENTS LIVING A MISSION
2010 CH 63
2010 CH 93*
2010 CH 95
2010 CH 101
2010 CH 125
BACHELORS DEGREE
in
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
INTERNAL EXAMINER:
EXTERNAL EXAMINER:
___________________
____________________
Name: ________________
(Project Supervisor)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT | I
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
All praise to ALMIGHTY ALLAH, who provided us with the strength to complete
this final year Plant Design project. All respects are for the Holy Prophet
(PBUH), whose teachings are true source of knowledge & guidance for whole
of the mankind.
Before anybody else we thank our parents who have always been a source of
moral support and driving force behind whatever we do.
The preparation and writing of this report faced many challenges, as we have
tried to cover complete Crude Distillation Process [Refining] of a refinery in
this project. The project could not have been researched, compiled and written
in these circumstances without the support of our Project Advisor.
We are highly indebted to our project advisor Dr. Shah Muhammad
(Associate Professor, UET Lahore) for his encouragement, technical
discussions, inspiring guidance, remarkable suggestions, keen interest,
constructive criticism & friendly discussions which enabled us to complete this
report. He spared a lot of precious time in advising & helping us in writing this
report.
We are thankful to our respected Chairman, Dr. Nadeem Feroze & honorable
teachers. We are also thankful to librarians of National Library of Engineering
Sciences, & Chemical Engineering Departmental Library for their cooperation
in search of design material.
We assure the reader that this may be our first project of its own kind, but at
least for a while, we have put a bit of "heart and soul" into it! Therefore, we
hope that you will find this report immensely educative & informative.
Authors
PROJECT MOTIVATION | II
PROJECT MOTIVATION
As students of Chemical Engineering we have always been interested in Oil
Refineries and petroleum industry. There is no doubted the fact that every
chemical engineer is fascinated by the highest paid industry for Chemical
Engineers, which is Petroleum Industry.
As Refinery is one of the two attractive fields, the other being fertilizer industry,
every Chemical Engineer is interested in making his/her career in, the decision
of taking this project and working on it was both challenging and interesting.
This project for the first time gave us the opportunity to explore the Refining
Process, in detail. Our knowledge of this process at the start of the project was
casual. We knew generally about fractionation, knowing nothing specific about
the process flow circuit and design of a chemical plant, also it would not be an
oversimplification of the facts, if we assert that we knew nothing about a
chemical plant before this project.
The learning curve embarked on was considerably steeper than previous work
we have ever undertaken. Hence, the report constitutes our first ever attempt of
understanding a whole chemical process combined with the process flow
conditions and process selection. Our previous knowledge did not cater for this
scale of work but if we can dream it we can do it was the core motivation
behind this project.
Authors
PREFACE | III
PREFACE
Naphtha is one of the most important hydrocarbon fuels currently used in
industry today. Its importance becomes even more pronounced for a growing
economy, because in addition to being deployed in the automobile industry, it
has also become a driving force behind industrial operation.
This report certainly cannot reflect all the efforts behind its compilation because
a lot of things, either of very basic concepts or considered irrelevant for this
report, have been omitted. Hence our emphasis has been on quality of the
report, not on the quantity.
As the art and science of design is a matter of handful experience, supported by
sound theoretical background. So due to the lack of experience, certain aspects
might have been incomplete in this work. But overall design procedures,
significant modification and assumptions strongly justified by logical and
theoretical ground give this work a status of a valuable concise report on the
recovery of naphtha.
To recover naphtha from crude oil, first of all, mass and energy balance was
carried out over the whole system, including equipments like de-salter, crude
tower, stabilizer etc. This forms the basis for our design, where the design specs
are set in order to meet the ranges specified by the rules of thumb or in
accordance with the International Design Standards like TEMA etc.
For the stability, optimization, and reduction of the effect of external forces,
instrumentation of the stabilizer is a necessary action performed after equipment
design completion. After that, HAZOP study gives an accurate idea about the
effect of changing variables on equipment strength and on how far we can push
the process variables. Owing to the global environmental consensus and the
growing need to preserve our planet, Environmental Impact Assessment or EIA
is considered an integral part of any industrial scale project. Our report,
therefore, has a page or two reserved for EIA.
I hope this report will be helpful in understanding the Crude Distillation
Process.
Authors
CONTENTS | IV
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .......................................................................................................................................I
PROJECT MOTIVATION ....................................................................................................................................II
PREFACE .........................................................................................................................................................III
TABLE OF CONTENTS...................................................................................................................................... IV
LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................................X
LIST OF FIGURES..............................................................................................................................................XI
1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................................1
1.1 CRUDE OIL ................................................................................................................................................ 1
Crude Bitumen:...................................................................................................................................................2
CONTENTS | V
5.4 ENERGY BALANCE ACROSS E-305 CRUDE/FFO (COLD) EXCHANGER ...................................................................... 32
5.5 ENERGY BALANCE ACROSS E-306 CRUDE/LGO (HOT) EXCHANGER ....................................................................... 33
5.6 ENERGY BALANCE ACROSS E-308 CRUDE/FFO (HOT) EXCHANGER ........................................................................ 34
5.7 ENERGY BALANCE ACROSS E-310 LWK TRIM COOLER ....................................................................................... 35
5.8 ENERGY BALANCE ACROSS ALL EXCHANGERS ................................................................................................... 36
5.9 ENERGY BALANCE ACROSS V-301 CRUDE TOWER ............................................................................................. 36
5.9.1 Enthalpy of Steam Entering in V-301, V-302, V-303, V-304............................................................. 36
6. EQUIPMENT DESIGN .................................................................................................................................. 39
6.1 SHELL & TUBE HEAT EXCHANGER E-301 LWK/CRUDE.................................................................................... 39
6.1.1 Heat Exchanger?........................................................................................................................... 39
6.1.1.1 Heat Exchanger as Heat Recovery Equipment ......................................................................................... 39
6.1.1.2 Uses of Heat Exchangers ........................................................................................................................ 39
6.1.1.3 Classification of Heat Exchanger............................................................................................................. 39
6.1.1.4 Heat Exchanger Selection Criteria........................................................................................................... 40
CONTENTS | VI
6.2.6.1 Combustion Reactions ........................................................................................................................... 53
CONTENTS | VII
6.4.5.13: Weighted Clean Overall Coefficient ..................................................................................................... 76
6.4.5.14: Dirt Factor .......................................................................................................................................... 77
6.4.5.15: Clean Surface Area Required ............................................................................................................... 77
6.4.5.16: Pressure Drop Tube Side .................................................................................................................. 77
6.4.5.17: Return Loss......................................................................................................................................... 77
6.4.5.18: Total Pressure..................................................................................................................................... 77
6.4.5.19: Total Pressure Drop Shell Side .......................................................................................................... 78
CONTENTS | VIII
7.5.2 Feed Forward Control Loop ........................................................................................................... 89
7.6 CONTROL SCHEME OF V- 401 STABILIZER ....................................................................................................... 89
7.6.1 Objective ...................................................................................................................................... 89
7.6.2 Manipulated Variables.................................................................................................................. 89
7.6.3 Loads / Disturbances..................................................................................................................... 89
7.6.4 Controller ..................................................................................................................................... 89
7.6.5 Final Control Element .................................................................................................................... 89
8. HAZARD OPERABILITY ................................................................................................................................ 92
8.1 HISTORY & APPLICATION ............................................................................................................................ 92
8.2 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................... 92
8.2.1 Hazard.......................................................................................................................................... 92
8.2.2 Operability.................................................................................................................................... 92
8.2.3 Types of HAZOP ............................................................................................................................ 92
8.2.4 The Reasons for such Widespread Use of HAZOPs.......................................................................... 93
8.2.5 When to perform a HAZOP? .......................................................................................................... 93
8.2.6 Success or failure of the HAZOP ..................................................................................................... 94
8.3 OBJECTIVES OF HAZOP STUDY .................................................................................................................... 94
8.4 FEATURES OF HAZOP STUDY ....................................................................................................................... 94
8.5 HAZOP STUDY METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................... 95
8.5.1 Specify the purpose, objective, and scope of the study. .................................................................. 95
8.5.2 Select the HAZOP study team ........................................................................................................ 95
8.5.3 Collect data. ................................................................................................................................. 96
8.5.4 Conduct the study ......................................................................................................................... 96
Primary Key Words: .......................................................................................................................................... 97
Secondary Key Words: ...................................................................................................................................... 97
Guide Words According to Parameter:............................................................................................................... 98
CONTENTS | IX
10. COST ESTIMATION ................................................................................................................................. 114
10.1 PLANT COST ESTIMATION ........................................................................................................................ 114
10.2 CAPITAL INVESTMENT............................................................................................................................. 114
10.2.1 Fixed-Capital Investment........................................................................................................... 115
10.3 WORKING CAPITAL ................................................................................................................................ 115
10.4 METHODS FOR ESTIMATING CAPITAL INVESTMENT ........................................................................................ 115
10.4.1 Percentage of Delivered - Equipment Cost ................................................................................. 116
10.5 COST ................................................................................................................................................. 116
10.5.1 Indirect Cost.............................................................................................................................. 117
10.5.2 Direct Cost ................................................................................................................................ 117
10.6 FIXED CAPITAL INVESTMENT .................................................................................................................... 118
10.7 ESTIMATION OF TOTAL PRODUCT COST ...................................................................................................... 119
10.7.1 Fixed charges: ........................................................................................................................... 119
10.7.2 Variable Production Cost ........................................................................................................... 119
10.7.3 Plant Overhead Cost ................................................................................................................. 120
10.8 GENERAL EXPENSES ............................................................................................................................... 120
10.9 TOTAL PRODUCTION COST ...................................................................................................................... 120
10.10 GROSS EARNINGS ................................................................................................................................ 120
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................................. 121
LIST OF TABLES | X
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1 - MAJOR CLASSES OF HYDROCARBONS IN CRUDE OIL ......................................................................... 1
TABLE 2 - CRUDE OIL PRODUCT YEILD ANALYSIS OF ARL .............................................................................. 17
TABLE 3- ARL DESIGN CONDITIONS ......................................................................................................... 18
TABLE 4- MATERIAL BALANCE ACROSS V-301............................................................................................ 27
TABLE 5 ENERGY BALANCE ACROSS ALL EXCHANGERS................................................................................ 36
TABLE 6 - ENERGY BALANCE ACROSS CRUDE TOWER ................................................................................... 37
TABLE 7 - THERMOPHYSICAL PROPERTIES FOR E-301 .................................................................................. 44
TABLE 8 - STOICHIOMETRIC CALCULATIONS OF H-301 HEATER...................................................................... 54
TABLE 9 - SPEC SHEET OF HEATER ........................................................................................................... 61
TABLE 10 - EXTRACTED DATA FOR CRUDE TOWER DESIGN............................................................................ 65
TABLE 11 - HEAT BALANCE OF TOWER TOP PLATE ..................................................................................... 67
TABLE 12 - NO OF MOLES CALCULATIONS................................................................................................. 68
TABLE 13 - NUMBER OF STAGES ESTIMATION IN CRUDE TOWER .................................................................... 69
TABLE 14 - THERMOPHYSICAL PROPERTIES FOR REBOILER ............................................................................ 81
TABLE 15 - FEATURES OF HAZOP ........................................................................................................... 95
LIST OF FIGURES | XI
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1 - PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM ...................................................................................................... 12
FIGURE 2 - MATERIAL BALANCE ACROSS DESALTER ..................................................................................... 20
FIGURE 3 - MATERIAL BALANCE ACROSS STABILIZER .................................................................................... 21
FIGURE 4 - MATERIAL BALANCE ACROSS LWK STRIPPER............................................................................... 23
FIGURE 5 - MATERIAL BALANCE ACROSS LGO STRIPPER ............................................................................... 24
FIGURE 6 - MATERIAL BALANCE ACROSS HGO STRIPPER .............................................................................. 25
FIGURE 7 MATERIAL BALANCE ACROSS V-305 ACCUMULATOR ................................................................... 26
FIGURE 8 - SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF SHELL & TUBE HEAT EXCHANGERS ......................................................... 40
FIGURE 9 - LABELLED DIAGRAM OF FIRED TUBE HEATER............................................................................... 49
FIGURE 10 - TYPES OF FURNACES USED IN PETROLEUM INDUSTRIES ............................................................... 50
FIGURE 11 - ENERGY BALANCE BOUNDARY ............................................................................................... 62
FIGURE 12 - FLASH VAPORIZATION CURVE OF CRUDE DISTILLATION................................................................ 63
FIGURE 13 - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE SLOPES OF DISTILLATION CURVES...................................................... 63
FIGURE 14 - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DISTILLATION TEMPERATURES ............................................................... 64
FIGURE 15 - SPEC SHEET OF CONDENSER .................................................................................................. 78
FIGURE 16 - CONTROL SCHEME OF V-401 STABILIZER ................................................................................. 90
CHAPTER # 1
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION | 1
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 CRUDE OIL
Crude oil is the term for "unprocessed" oil, the stuff that comes out of the ground. Crude oil
is a fossil fuel, meaning that it was made naturally from decaying plants and animals living in
ancient seas millions of years ago most places you can find crude oil were once sea beds.
Crude oils are such a useful starting point for so many different substances because they
contain hydrocarbons, which are molecules containing hydrogen and carbon and come in
various lengths and structures, from straight chains to branching chains to rings.
There are two things that make hydrocarbons exciting to chemists:
1. Hydrocarbons contain a lot of energy. Many of the things derived from crude oil like
gasoline, diesel fuel, paraffin wax and so on take advantage of this energy.
2. Hydrocarbons can take on many different forms. The smallest hydrocarbon is methane
(CH4), which is a gas that is a lighter than air. Longer chains with 5 Cs are liquids.
Very long chains are solids like wax. Hydrocarbon chains are very versatile!
The major classes of hydrocarbons in crude oils include:
Class
Paraffins
Aromatics
Napthenes
or
Cycloalkanes
Alkenes
Alkynes
n
Y
Formula
CnH2n+2
C6H5 Y
CnH2n
CnH2n
linear or branched chain molecules containing one carboncarbon double-bond, can be liquid or gas
Examples: ethylene, butene, isobutene Dienes
CnH2n-2
INTRODUCTION | 2
In crude oils,
The color can range from pure black or dark brown to greenish or yellowish, and in viscosity,
from water to almost solid depending on the composition.
Crude oil is considered light if the level of hydrocarbons relative to organics and metals is
high, making its density low, and it is considered heavy if the level of hydrocarbons relative
to organics and metals is low, making its density as high.
Additionally, crude oil is classified as sweet if it has very little sulfur in it, and is classified as
sour if it has a great deal of sulfur in it. So a crude oil will usually be called something like a
sweet, light oil, or a sour, heavy oil.
Sweeter oils are more valuable than sour oils, because most countries have sulfur regulations
for environmental reasons, and sweet oils require less treatment to remove the sulfur. Light
oils are more valuable than heavy oils, because more gasoline can be created from a smaller
amount.
Different regions on earth tend to have different types of oil, so crude oil is often classified
based on where it comes from. Certain regions will act as a sample of a broader region, since
they are seen as relatively representative of that broad region. For example,
Dubai-Oman oil is a sour crude oil, and is used to benchmark most sour crude from
the Middle East;
West Texas Intermediate is a sweet, light oil; and
the OPEC Reference Basket is a composite oil sample that averages oils from all over the
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries.
While conventional crude oil is currently the major source of petroleum on the planet, it
actually makes up a minority of crude oil currently in reserve.
A bit less than one-third of the crude oil known on the planet is in conventional form.
Another one-sixth is heavy oil, and
a quarter is extra-heavy oil.
Another one-third, is in the form of oil sands, or crude bitumen.
CRUDE BITUMEN: This is not a liquid form of crude oil, but is mixed with sand into a
somewhat solid form. Huge reserves of bitumen can be found in Venezuela and Canada,
which also contain large amount of extra-heavy oil, making the two countries reserves equal
to about twice the known reserves of conventional oil.
Now that we know what's in crude oil, let's see what we can make from it.
INTRODUCTION | 3
INTRODUCTION | 4
At the current rate of consumption it is estimated that worldwide reserves will become
extinguished by 2039. Scientists and engineers are working hard to find ways of more
efficiently extracting and processing crude oil to delay what could become a global energy
crisis.
CHAPTER # 2
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
PROCESS DESCRIPTION | 6
2. PROCESS DESCRIPTION
2.1 CRUDE OIL FLOW
The following process description can best be understood by referring to the Process Flow
Diagram in next Section. All references to operating conditions reflect the operation when
processing Sweet Crude Oil (API = 44.28).
Crude oil flows into the suction of the Crude Charge Pump, P-301 A or B, from crude
storage. This pump provides part of the necessary head required to move the crude oil
through the crude charge system. The crude oil is pumped through the
Water is added in the Crude Stream before flowing into Desalter. Water may also be injected
at intermediate positions, if desired
upstream of the Crude Charge Pump, P-301 A or B,
upstream of the Kerosene Crude Exchanger, E-301
The normal De-salter water addition rate is 3 volume percent of the crude charge. In the
Desalter, water droplets are electrostatically coalesced and collected water exits the vessel on
tri-cork level control. The desalting system is designed for processing Crudes with salt
contents up to 16 kg / 159 m3 (35 lbs. /1000 bbl.). Normal De-salter pressure should be
maintained at approximately 140 psig (965 kPa) in order to always maintain hydraulic
pressure on this vessel and prevent any possible vaporization.
From the De-salter, crude oil flows into the suction of the Crude Booster Pump, P-313 A or
B. This pump provides the remainder of the necessary head required to move the crude oil
through the
At this point an optional recirculating residue or bottoms stream (FFO) joins the fresh crude
charge stream on flow control. The purpose of this recirculating stream is to continually
maintain a satisfactory flow of liquid at the heater outlet and prevent excessive vaporization
and possible tube coking.
PROCESS DESCRIPTION | 7
About 15 % of the fresh crude charge rate in the form of residue will be re-circulated when
processing Sweet crude. If crude oils, containing as much as 25 volume percent residue, are
processed no recirculation will be required.
The preheated charge and recycle stream enters the convection section of a Direct Fired
Charge Heater H-301, from which the additional feed heat requirement is satisfied. The
charge heater is supplied with a dual fuel burner system so that either fuel (Natural Gas in our
project) or refinery fuel gas may be used as a combustion medium.
The crude charge enters the flash zone of the Crude Tower, V-301, from the Fired Heater, H301. Sufficient over-flash (3% in our project) must be maintained to ensure ample reflux on
the trays immediately above the flash zone. The vaporized distillates and some over-flashed
material passes up the tower and the residue (FFO), passes to the stripping section beneath
the flash zone (feed point). It is expected that a heater outlet temperature of approximately
324C will be required at design plant yields.
PROCESS DESCRIPTION | 8
circulated through the Light Gas Oil Pump around Crude Exchanger, E-307. The combined
pumparound stream returns to the main tower on 18th Tray.
This pumparound loop unloads the top section of the crude tower and reduces the load on the
overhead system. Three trays in the main tower serve as the Light Gas Oil pumparound
section.
PROCESS DESCRIPTION | 9
Condenser, E-309. This regulation may be required if that naphtha fed to the Stabilizer, V401, is heat exchanged with stabilizer bottoms as a means of heat recovery. If the Overhead
Accumulator, V-305, temperature is allowed to fall too low, sufficient stabilizer feed heat
recovery may not be achieved, imposing greater than design loads on the Stabilizer Reboiler,
E-403.
Condensed naphtha collected in the crude tower overhead accumulator flows into the suction
of the Naphtha Reflux Pump, P-302 A or B. This pump provides the necessary head required
to pump naphtha reflux back into the Crude Tower,
The reflux rate is reset by the crude tower overhead vapor Temperature Controller. A level
controller on the Overhead Accumulator, V-305, and resets the stabilizer feed flow controller,
allowing naphtha to be boosted into the suction of the Stabilizer Feed Pump, P-303 A or B.
This pump provides the necessary head required to move naphtha through
the Stabilizer Feed-Bottoms Exchanger, E-401
into the Naphtha Stabilizer, V-401
PROCESS DESCRIPTION | 10
PROCESS DESCRIPTION | 11
kettle re-boiler. The Re-boiler vapor return temperature to the stabilizer is maintained by
resetting the Light Gas Oil flow rate through the Re-boiler.
The liquid level in the bottom of the stabilizer rises as necessary to provide the head required
to offset the pressure drop through the Re-boiler and associated piping. Stabilized naphtha
flows
Stabilized naphtha flows to battery limits at38C and 100 psig (690 kPa). A by-pass is
provided around the shell side of the Stabilizer Feed-Bottoms Exchanger, E-401, to allow
control of the Stabilizer feed temperature if required.
PROCESS DESCRIPTION | 12
CHAPTER # 3
CAPACITY SELECTION
CAPACITY SELECTION | 14
3. CAPACITY SELECTION
The capacity for the plant is selected based on the market demand of one of the products of
Crude Oil Distillation. From the data for Pakistan
(2012 13) 3.8 .
Just to indicate how fast the demand for diesel is growing in country, the statistics show
( 2012 2013) 1
The capacity calculation is based on the gasoline import required for the year 2012-13.
Assuming that Gasoline is produced by fractionation of Crude Oil is by weight 40% of the
feed (Crude Oil). Then to meet the market demand,
= 2.8 0.4 = 7.0
and
141.5
= 0.805
44.28 + 131.5
1 1000 13
1
1 =
= 7.1813 /
1
805 0.15899 3
1 = 7.1813
CAPACITY SELECTION | 15
A distillation unit of this much large capacity is not yet practically possible. The largest such
plant in operation is at (Saudi Arabia) with a capacity of 45,000 BPSD. The largest proposed
crude distillation unit will come up in Korea in 2010 with a capacity of 75,000 BPSD.
Now we turn to the previous installations of distillation units. Attock Refinery Limited has a
unit of 5000 BPSD. Giving an allowance for future expansion, and considering the fact that
the new units are being installed with larger capacities, we select the capacity of the unit to be
5,000 BPSD.
= 5,000
CHAPTER # 4
MATERIAL BALANCE
MATERIAL BALANCE | 17
4. MATERIAL BALANCE
4.1 INTRODUCTION
We would take feed basis for our material balance. Which means we are fixing the refining
capacity of crude oil for our plant. The awesome thing about Crude Oil is that wherever we
get it from, its composition depends on its API gravity which in turn is dependent upon the
specific gravity of crude and characterization factor (UOP K factor) which depends upon the
distillation curve (ASTM D86). Hence if we know the API gravity of crude oil, we know the
mass percentages of products to be separated from crude oil.
See Appendix B of Petroleum Refinery Engineering (Nelson)
We have selected 5000 Barrels per Stream Day BPSD as our plants refining capacity. We
have selected crude oil of 44.28 API gravity. Our plant has five products out of which we are
concerned only with the Naphtha, but for material balance we would take every product in
consideration.
The following table has been extracted from ARLs Howe Baker Units Manual.
(The primary source of our design data is Attock Refinery Limited, Morgah, Rawalpindi)
Volumetric
API
Crude Charged
% age
Flow Rate
BPSD
Mass
Flow Rate
lbs./hr.
44.28
100.0
20000
234640
0.57
114
678
Products
Off Gasses
Liquefied Petroleum Gas
LPG
0.93
186
1500
Naphtha
Nap
60.40
42.5
8500
91492
LWK
42.91
20.0
4000
47297
LGO
32.15
21.0
4200
52928
HGO
22.27
5.0
1000
13411
FFO
19.50
10.0
2000
27334
MATERIAL BALANCE | 18
Instrument
Tag No.
Volumetric
Service
FRC-103
Crude Charge
FIC-101
BPSD
Mass
% age
Kg/hr.
% age
20,000
100.000
106660
Desalter Water
600
3.000
FR-116
Off-Gasses
114
0.570
308
0.30
FRC-113
LPG to Treating
186
0.930
682
0.64
FR-115
Naphtha to Storage
8500
42.500
41521
38.93
FRC-108
Kerosene Product
4000
20.000
21500
20.16
FRC-110
4200
21.000
6101
5.72
FRC-109
1000
5.000
24063
22.56
FR-114
Residue to Storage
2000
10.000
12416
11.64
FRC-112
Stabilizer Reflux
1104
5.520
4052
3.80
FRC-106
Naphtha Reflux
6317
31.585
30860
28.93
FRC-102
Naphtha Pumparound
15051
75.255
73526
68.93
FRC-105
10624
53.120
60858
57.06
FRC-111
11100
55.500
63590
59.62
FI-5
756
0.7088
FI-8
756
0.7088
Fl-7
476
0.4463
FI-6
76
0.07
MATERIAL BALANCE | 19
The density of brine in water is 973.7 kg/m3 extracted from A Technical Data book for
Geothermal Energy Utilization (Phillips)
159
1 3
1 1000
3
= 5000
=
33.125
24
= 0.805 1000
33.125
= 26665.625
3
3
3
= 0.99
0.99
= 990
3
3
3
. = 1.03
= @ 120
= 1.03
973.7 3 = 1002.91
DESALTED CRUDE
306
= 306
+ = +
26665.625
+ 990
= 1002.91
+
= .
MATERIAL BALANCE | 20
= 80
= 170.66
141.5
131.5
.
. = 0.7374
= % = 0.425 33.125
= 14.07813
MATERIAL BALANCE | 21
= 0.7374 1000
14.07813
= 10381.21
3
401 = + +
401 = 80
+ 170.66
+ 10381.21
401 = 10631.87
= 189.01
MATERIAL BALANCE | 22
NAPHTHA REFLUX
= %
= . 26665.625
NAPHTHA PUMPAROUND
= 7714.37
= %
= . 26665.625
NAPHTHA RETURN
= 18380.62
= +
= 7714.37
LGO TO REBOILER
+ 18380.62
= 26094.99
= %
= . 26665.625
LGO PUMPAROUND
= 15898.05
= %
= . 26665.625
LGO RETURN
= 15215.41
= +
= 15898.05
+ 15215.41
= 31113.46
= . =
141.5
131.5
.
. = 0.8113
MATERIAL BALANCE | 23
= % = . 33.125
3
3
= 6.625
5374.86
0.92
= 5842.24
V-302 STEAM
302 = % 302
302 = . 26665.625
= 189.01
+ 189.01
= 5374.86
+ 302
302 = 656.39
MATERIAL BALANCE | 24
141.5
131.5
.
. = 0.8647
= % = . 33.125
= 0.8647 1000
6.95625
= 6015.07
3
303 = %
303 =
V-303 STEAM
3
3
= 6.95625
6015.07
0.95
= 6331.65
303 = % 303
303 = . 26665.625
= 119.01
+ 119.01
= 6015.07
+ 303
303 = 435.59
MATERIAL BALANCE | 25
141.5
131.5
.
. = 0.9202
= % = . 33.125
= 0.9202 1000
1.65625
= 1524.08
3
304 = %
304 =
V-304 STEAM
3
3
= 1.65625
1524.08
0.96
= 1587.58
304 = % 304
304 = . 26665.625
= 19.01
+ 19.01
= 1524.08
+ 304
304 = .
MATERIAL BALANCE | 26
305 = 10631.87
+ 7714.37
= 18346.24
V-301 OVERHEAD
+ 189.01
+ 119.01
+ 19.01
305 = 516.04
+ 516.04
= 18862.28
MATERIAL BALANCE | 27
141.5
131.5
.
. = 0.9371
= % = . 33.125
= 0.9371 1000
3.3125
= 3104.14
3
MATERIAL IN
Stream
Desalted Crude
3
3
= 3.3125
MATERIAL OUT
Kg/hr.
26652.715
Stream
V-301 Overhead
Kg/hr.
18802.87
656.39
5842.24
435.59
6331.65
82.51
1587.58
189.01
3104.14
Steam V-301
Naphtha Reflux
Material In to V-301
7654.95
35671.17
35668.48
CHAPTER # 5
ENERGY BALANCE
ENERGY BALANCE | 29
5. ENERGY BALANCE
5.1 ENERGY BALANCE ACROSS E-301 CRUDE/LWK EXCHANGER
E-301 SHELL SIDE LWK
= 5374.86
= 26665.625
301 =
301 = 130 F 85 F = 45 F
336 F + 135 F
= 235.5 F
2
50 42.91
42.91 40
(0.58)
(0.55) +
50 40
50 40
= 0.5587 = 2.339
301 = 301
301 = 5374.86
201
2.339
1.8
301 = 1403850.73
301 = 389.9585
301 =
130 F + 85 F
= 107.5 F
2
50 44.28
44.28 40
(0.52)
(0.49) +
50 40
50 40
= 0.5028 = 2.105
301 = 301
301 = 26665.625
45
2.105
1.8
301 = 1403278.52
301 = 389.7996
ENERGY BALANCE | 30
= 26665.625
302 =
325 F + 180 F
= 252.5 F
2
40 32.15
32.15 30
(0.56)
(0.55) +
40 30
40 30
= 0.5522 = 2.312
302 = 302
302 = 6015.07
145
2.312
1.8
302 = 1120273.37
302 = 311.1870
302 =
160 F + 130 F
= 148 F
2
50 44.28
44.28 40
(0.53)
(0.505) +
50 40
50 40
= 0.5157 = 2.159
302 = 302
302 = 26665.625
35
2.159
1.8
302 = 1119437.75
302 = 310.9549
ENERGY BALANCE | 31
= 26652.715
304 =
581 F + 280 F
= 430.5 F
2
30 32.15
22.27 20
(0.64)
(0.615) +
30 20
30 20
= 0.6207 = 2.599
304 = 304
304 = 1524.08
301
2.599
1.8
304 = 662381.26
304 = 183.9948
304 =
264 F + 246 F
= 255 F
2
50 44.28
44.28 40
(0.61)
(0.58) +
50 40
50 40
= 0.5928 = 2.482
304 = 304
304 = 26652.715
18
2.482
1.8
304 = 661520.39
304 = 183.7557
ENERGY BALANCE | 32
= 26652.715
305 =
435 F + 300 F
= 367.5 F
2
20 19.50
19.50 10
(0.575)
(0.55) +
20 10
20 10
= 0.5719 = 2.394
305 = 305
305 = 3104.14
135
2.394
1.8
305 = 557348.34
304 = 154.8190
305 =
279 F + 264 F
= 271.5 F
2
50 44.28
44.28 40
(0.61)
(0.59) +
50 40
50 40
= 0.5986 = 2.506
305 = 305
305 = 26652.715
15
2.506
1.8
305 = 556597.53
305 = 154.6104
ENERGY BALANCE | 33
= 26652.715
306 =
465 F + 325 F
= 395 F
2
40 32.15
32.15 30
(0.65)
(0.635) +
40 30
40 30
= 0.6382 = 2.672
306 = 306
306 = 6015.07
140
2.672
1.8
306 = 1250065.21
306 = 347.2403
306 =
312 F + 279 F
= 295.5 F
2
50 44.28
44.28 40
(0.625)
(0.60) +
50 40
50 40
= 0.6107 = 2.557
306 = 306
306 = 26652.715
33
2.557
1.8
306 = 1249434.86
306 = 347.0652
ENERGY BALANCE | 34
= 26652.715
308 =
592 F + 435 F
= 513.5 F
2
19.50 10
20 19.50
(0.645) +
(0.665)
20 10
20 10
= 0.6640 = 2.780
308 = 308
308 = 3104.14
157
2.780
1.8
308 = 752684.97
308 = 209.0792
308 =
405 F + 387 F
= 396 F
2
44.28 40
50 44.28
(0.665) +
(0.68)
50 40
50 40
= 0.6714 = 2.811
308 = 308
308 = 26652.715
18
2.811
1.8
308 = 749207.82
308 = 208.1133
ENERGY BALANCE | 35
310 =
135 F + 100 F
= 117.5 F
2
50 42.91
42.91 40
(0.51)
(0.485) +
50 40
50 40
= 0.4923 = 2.061
310 = 310
310 = 5374.86
35
2.061
1.8
310 = 215397.51
310 = 59.8326
ENERGY BALANCE | 36
ENERGY OUT
Shell Side
Tube Side
Stream
KJ/sec (KW)
Stream
KJ/sec (KW)
E 301
LWK
389.9585
Crude
389.7996
E 302
LGO (cold)
311.1870
Crude
310.9549
E 303
Naphtha PA
Crude
768.6366
E 304
HGO
183.9948
Desalted Crude
183.7557
E 305
FFO (cold)
154.8190
Desalted Crude
154.6104
E 306
LGO (hot)
347.2403
Desalted Crude
347.0652
E 307
LGO PA
Desalted Crude
878.5525
E 308
FFO (hot)
Desalted Crude
204.1154
204.3410
200 185
185 158.83
(2850.6)
(2756.2) +
200 158.83
200 158.83
600 = 2816.2
200 185
185 170.41
(2839.8)
(2768.3) +
200 170.41
200 170.41
800 = 2803.6
800 758
758 600
(2803.6)
(2816.2) +
800 600
800 600
RECOVERY OF NAPHTHA FROM CRUDE OIL | SLAM
ENERGY BALANCE | 37
758 (185 ) = 2806.2
ENERGY IN
ENERGY OUT
Stream
KJ/sec (KW)
Stream
KJ/sec (KW)
V-301 Feed
7738.42
LWK
632.5829
Total Steam
402.2532
LGO
996.8126
525.739
HGO
321.805
FFO
687.672
Naphtha Ovhd.
3349.63
LPG
11.976
Naphtha Reflux
Desalted Crude
204.1154
CHAPTER # 6
EQUIPMENT DESIGN
6. EQUIPMENT DESIGN
Construction
Degrees of surface compactness
Flow arrangements
Pass arrangements
Phase of the process fluid
Flow rates
Operating pressure and temperature
Flow arrangements
Performance parametersthermal effectiveness and pressure drops
Fouling tendencies
Types and phases of fluids
Material of construction and ease of construction
Space available
Maintenance, inspection, cleaning, extension, and repair possibilities
Overall economy
Fabrication technique
Intended application
DESIGN METHODS
Two approaches are used in designing heat exchangers. In the first approach, the heat
exchanger is taken as a single control volume with an average overall heat transfer
coefficient, and two inlets and two outlets. This is called lumped analysis. In the second
analysis. The heat exchanger is divided into segments or multiple control volumes, with the
outlet of one control volume being the inlet to an adjacent control volume. This is a local
analysis or differential analysis. The heat transfer rate (heat duty) for the heat exchanger is
obtained by integrating the local Values. The first approach is more common and simpler and
it generally provides acceptable results for design.
6.1.3 NOMENCLATURE
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
, ho =
= ,
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
= .
= .
= 5374.86
301 = 389.9585
= 26665.625
301 = 389.7996
301 = 130 F 85 F = 45 F
301 =
336 F + 135 F
= 235.5 F
2
301 =
130 F + 85 F
= 107.5 F
2
1. neither of the liquids is very viscous at the cold terminal, say not more than 1.0 cP
2. the temperature ranges do not exceed 50 to 100 F, and
3. the temperature difference is less than 50 F
R=
FC =
K C = C1 () + C2
1
R
+
KC R1
ln(KC +1)
1+ ln(R)
KC
= 0.2586
= 0.0635
= 85 + 0.3748 45 = .
= 0.3613
= 0.3748
Now at these temperatures, collect thermo-physical properties using the formulas and tables
in (Assaad) of
Density of Fluid
S = 751.43
Viscosity
S = 0.001291 kg/ms
T = 0.002936 kg/ms
Thermal Conductivity
kS = 0.136981 W / m K
kT = 0.1425
Specific Heat
cp,S = 2302.74
Fouling Factor
RdO = 0.00018
kg/m3
T = 788.78
kg/m3
W/mK
J/kg K
m2 K / W
Rdi = 0.00035
m2 K / W
T1 T2
T
ln T1
2
. .
.
.
= 61.21
U .
LMTD
382301.932 KJ/hr
= 18.92 2
(330)(61.21)
Numerical method of correction factor (fT) calculations is adopted as stted by (Kern) on Page
144 | Eq. (7.41): Fractional ratio of the true temperature difference to the LMTD
R=
= 4.66
Corrected HT Area:
AHT =
( )
U . fT . LMTD
S=
(+ + )
(++ + )
= 0.179
= .
382301.932
= 23.65606 2
(330)(0.8)(61.21)
Length
L
Outside Diameter
do
Thickness
Tube Pitch
PT
Tube Clearance c = PT - Do
Pitch Type
Number of Tube Passes NP
Segmental Baffle
Baffle Spacing
B
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
6m
0.01905 m (0.75 inch)
0.0027686 (12 BWG)
0.0238 m (15/16 inch)
0.00475 m
Triangular
2
25% Cut
0.06 m
AHT 23.65606 m2
=
=
aST
0.35908 m2
n=
NT 66
=
=
NP
2
DH = 4
0.0238 m
PT
0.86 PT
do
2
0.86(0.0238 m)
3.140.01905
3.14(0.01905 m)2
8
SHELL SIDE
aS =
DH = .
aS =
do 2
TUBE SIDE
cT BDS
PT
aT = n di 2
4
aT = 33
aS = .
3.14
(0.0135128)2
4
aT = .
TUBE SIDE
mS 1.48670592
=
aS
0.00364992 2
GS = .
GT =
mT 7.40711806
=
aT
0.00473254 2
GT = .
TUBE SIDE
DH GS
S
0.0135087 m 407.32607
0.00129
788.78
ReS =
kg
ReT =
T uT di
T
1.7218
m
s
0.00294
0.0135128m
ReT =
PrS =
2302.74
TUBE SIDE
cp,S S
kS
0.00129
0.13698
PrS = .
PrT =
PrT =
2064.518
cp,T T
kT
0.00294
0.14250
PrT = .
TUBE SIDE
NuT = 0.027 ReT 0.8 PrT 0.3
TUBE SIDE
, =
0.13698
0.013
, = .
= 101.39
0.14250
0.0135
, = 1069.27
=
=
999.24
+ 0.00018 +
+ , +
1
0.01905 0.00035
0.0135
, +
+
0.01905
0.01351069.27
= 334.155
Which is very close to the assumed value of U* = 330 W/m2 K. Hence accept this design.
SHELL SIDE
TUBE SIDE
N = 99
2 ( + 1)
2
= .
= 0.8 KPa
N = 2
2
2
= .
= 13.1 KPa
These types of furnaces are used for large capacities i.e. 25-100 million /
They are best suited to oil firing because of large heat duty
Rate of heat varies widely because of large size
Roof construction of these furnaces is very costly. These require very tall stacks.
TYPE (E)
In this type of furnace, heat distribution is very poor i.e. chances of overheating of
shield tubes are more.
It is used for large capacity. It is suited for oil firing.
TYPE (F, G, H)
These are best suited for very low rates of heat absorption.
TYPE (I, K)
These are used when there is need to control rate of heat transfer in high range
i.e. 540-850 C
(a) Large boxtype (b) Separate convection (c) Down convection (d) Straightup (e) A-frame
(f) Circular (g) Large isoflow, (h) Small isoflow (i) Equiflux (j) Double-up fired (k) Radiant
wall.
. (1) Down-convection, but with two rows of tubes on the roof, and with tubes on the floor.
This applies only to large stills., (2) Down-convection, with only roof tubes and for smaller
stills, (3) Down-convection, (4) Straight-up, with half the tubes in the convection section, with
two rows of tubes on each wall, and with a width that is one-fourth of the length., (5)
Straight-up, with one row of radiant wall tubes and a width of 10 center-to-center tube
spacing. Two-thirds of the tubes are in the convection section. (6) Overhead convection, with
two rows of radiant tubes.
6.2.4 NOMENCLATURE
=
=
=
= Cold plane Surface Area
, , =
=
=
=
=
=
=
H = Enthalpy
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
= ,
=
=
=
=
=
, = ,
=
Percentage
CH4
90.75
C2H6
5.25
C3H8
1.9
C4H10
0.95
N2
0.65
H2S
0.5
14089393.517
=
= 18785858.019
0.75
367.884
17.83
= 367.884
= 20.62
2 6 + 3.52 22 + 32
3 8 + 6.52 32 + 42
4 10 + 6.52 42 + 52
RECOVERY OF NAPHTHA FROM CRUDE OIL | SLAM
2 + 1.52 2 + 2
Fuel Amount
Used
2
(/)
2
(/)
2
(/)
1.083
3.791
2.166
3.249
2 6
3 8
4 10
2
18.72
37.444
0.392
1.960
0.196
1.274
0.134
0.103
Total
18.72
1.176
0.784
0.155
.
37.444
2
(/)
1.568
0.980
0.103
0.103
55.78 2 (/)
265.623 / = 7703.072 /
11.156 /
209.976 /
287.3825473 /
Component
Percentage
15
7.94
3.8
73.06
0.035
= 20.98
1.
Calculation of
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
6.2.7.1: CALCULATION OF
= 2 = 2 68104.28 = 136208.5521
2
.
= 247651.9022
. .
2
Q a = 193101.586
H at 25 C = 23.76
Q w = 375717.153
Qg = Q2 + Q2 + Q2 + Q2
H2 = 1993.183/
H2 = 3027.869/
H2 = 698.496/
H2 = 12444.45/
QR = QF + Qa Qw Qg
Q R = 11055864.834
= 7547377.611
Economical length of tube can be extracted from the (Nelson) Page 887 | Fig. (23.9): Most
economical tube lengths for some common arrangements of pipe stills
Length of the tube
= 7.924 m
Diameter of the tube
= 0.126 m (5 in)
Center to Center spacing for tube = 0.253 m (10 in)
Surface area per tube
As = = 3.14 0.126 7.924 = 3.160 2
Q t = As
Q t = 225887.458 /
Q R 11055864.834
=
=
=
Qt
225887.458
Radiant Section:
1: 2: 3
= 7.924 m
= 2.639 m
= 5.282 m
23
2
= 37.294 2.639 5.282
3
3
End Walls
Side Walls
Acp = = 102.657 2
Acp =
Acp
= 2.012 2
Nt
(Nelson) Page 594 | Fig. (18.3): Distribution of radiation to tubes suspended in front of a
wall
Effectiveness factor
= 0.88
= 90.338 2
= 1.771 2
( ) = .
= 7.085 2
= ( ) +
= 97.423 2
=
= 0.55
97.423
(Nelson) Page 605 | Fig. (18-10): Combustion data on cracked-gas and oil fuels.
Partial Pressure of 2 + 2 = 0.801
P.P Mean Beam Length = 0.556 ATM m
New overall exchange factor from the (Kern) Page 700 | Fig. (19.15): Overall heatexchange factor in radiant section
The value of f = 0.47
For the verification of flue gas temperatureTg from the (Kern) Page 699 | Fig. (19.14):
Radiant-Section heat flux
Tg = 718
Q R = 10862763.248
10862763.248
=
= 70722.99972 /. 2
153.516
Ts
=
=
=
260
221
265
718
1 2
1
2
(260221)
= 169.22
4.5
= ( + + )
Where,
=
=
=
=
= 10.32
= 3.82
= (. ) = 1.014
= (. . )
= 0.505
= = 4.025 2
= 8255.304 /.
= 2049.54
=
0.567
2
sec 2
= 77.406688
UC LMTD
3226630.266
77.406 169.22
= 246.333 2
246.333
=
= 78
3.14 3.14 0.1267.926
Tube Length
C-C Spacing of tubes
Diameter of the tube
Tubes per pass
=
=
=
=
7.924 m
0.253 m
0.126 m
4 (assumed)
Fired Heater
Numbers Required
Operation
Continuous
Material of Construction
Stainless Steel
Refractory
Fire Clay
Burner type
Muffle Burner
14089393.517 /.
Heat Duty
367.884 /.
Fuel Required
Radiant heat Duty, QR
Number of tubes in Radiant Section
10862763.248 /.
52
7.924
Tube Length
0.126
0.253
110.599 3
3226630.266 /.
78
77.4066 /. 2
UC
84.360 3
194.95 3
70% = 645
10% = 210
645 210
= 7.25
70 10
Slope of Flash Curve is extracted using (Nelson) Page 112 | Fig. (4-18): Relationship
between the slopes of distillation curves.
50% = 475
The Vaporizer Temp, as obtained from Flash Curve at 760 mmHg, must be corrected for
tower pressure (20 psi) and for the effect of steam (516.04 kg/hr.).
= 760 +
Specific
Gravity
Naphtha
0.7374
12.17
Kerosene
0.8113
20
760 = 1795
14.7
MABP
= ( )3
MWa
262.7384
177
10381.21 22838.66
12.18
504.9089
248
5374.86
11824.69
47.68
0.8647
12.60
833.326
454
6015.07
13233.15
29.15
0.9202
12.61
1102.399
527
1524.08
3352.976
6.36
kg/hr.
lb./hr.
lbmoles
129.032
212.2225
Steam
18
1135.288 63.07156
Total Moles Gas
275.2941
a. Molecular Weight is extracted using Molal Avg. Boiling Point (Nelson) Page 178 | (Fig.59): Molecular weights, pseudo critical temperatures, Characterization Factors, and
gravities of petroleum fractions
=
1795
212.22
1795 =
275.30
This tower, the stock that is being processed, and the quantities of steam are all normal.
Under these conditions, the side-draw temperatures and top temperature may be estimated
from (Nelson) Page 470 | (Fig. 16-4): Range of top and side-draw temperatures in a
topping (or atmospheric pressure) tower
Tower Top
Kerosene
Light Gas Oil
Heavy Gas Oil
Latent Heat a
284.00
378.00
489.00
593.00
128.00
102.00
76.00
68.00
a. estimated from (Nelson) Page 173 | (Fig. 5.5) Atmospheric latent heat of vaporization
as a function of molecular weight (preferred) or API gravity
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
= 1.2 + 35
( ) + 0.65 ( )
= 1.2() + 35
58664.375
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
3
58664.375 /
415.822 /
604
77
365
6
(604 77 ) + 0.65
=
415.822
58664.375
(604 365 )
= 604 7 =
Avg. T
Cp a
F
BTU/lb. F
delta T
F
Q
BTU/hr.
Naphtha
Kerosene
Light Gas Oil
Heavy Gas Oil
Fuel Furnace Oil
22838.662
11824.692
13233.154
3352.976
6829.108
444.00
491.00
546.50
598.50
600.50
0.558
0.566
0.582
0.597
0.708
4,078,071.49
1,512,567.30
885,695.00
22,018.99
33,845.06
Cooling Steam
1135.288
( 365 - 284 ) = 81
324.5
0.5
45,979.16
6,578,177.00
Latent Heat
BTU/lb.
128.00
102.00
76.00
Q
BTU/hr.
1,513,560.58
1,349,781.71
254,826.18
3,118,168.46
9,696,345.46
a. estimated from (Nelson) Page 170 | (Fig. 5.2) Specific beats of Mid Continent oil vapors
with a correction factor for other bases of oils
9696345.46 /
128 /
= 75752.70
22838.66
1135.29
lb
hr
lb
hr
Moles
BTU/lb.
lb
hr
427.98
129.03
63.07
99726.65
Total
lb
hr
620.08
460 +
14.7
= . 379
= .
520
+ 14.7
99726.65
=
=
= . /
3
178442.18
For minimum entrainment we use a tray spacing of 22 inch, for discussion on tray spacing vs.
entrainment see (Nelson) Page 490. The allowable mass velocity of the vapors at the top of
the tower can be computed from (Nelson) Page 493 | Eq. (16-8).
= ( )
The constant K can be obtained from (Nelson) Page 494 | (Fig. 16.13) Effect of tray spacing
and type of service on allowable vapor load of fractionators. At a tray spacing of 22 in
and when using conventional bubble plates (curve 3), the value of K is 730 or higher.
= 29.45 2
99726.65
3386.34
= .
29.45 2
178442.18
3600
=
=
29.45 2
= 1.68 /
Which is within the allowable range mentioned in (Nelson) on Page 491 | (Table. 16.4).
RECOMMENDATION
OUR ESTIMATE
3-6
3-5
4-7
4-5
4-5
4-5
3-4
2-4
Stripping bottom
4-6
4-5
TOTAL NO OF TRAYS
23
22
= 44
12
44
=
=
= .
6.12
RECOVERY OF NAPHTHA FROM CRUDE OIL | SLAM
The direct contact type of condenser may consist of a vapor which is bubbled into a pool of
liquid, a liquid which is sprayed into a vapor, or a packed-column in which the liquid flows
downwards as a film over a packing material against the upward flow of vapor.
Condensers in which the streams are separated may be subdivided into three main types:
I.
II.
III.
Air cooled
Shell & tube
Plate
In the air-cooled type, condensation occurs inside tubes with cooling provided by air blown
or sucked across the tubes. Fins with large surface areas are usually provided on the air side
to compensate for the low air-side heat transfer coefficients. In shell and-tube condensers,
the condensation may occur inside or outside the tubes. The orientation of the unit may be
vertical or horizontal.
The overhead vapors from the distillation column passes through the condenser, where all
vapors converts to liquid phase by means of a coolant.
easy availability,
high heat transfer rates,
low pressure drop,
easy maintenance,
And gives design flexibility.
6.4.3 NOMENCLATURE
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
= ,
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
= .
= .
=
=
=
= g
=
=
=
= , (/ )0.14
SHELL SIDE
The specific heat values are extracted from (Nelson) Page 170 | Fig. (5-2): Specific heats of
Mid Continent oil vapors and latent heat values from Page 176 | Fig. (5-8): Latent heats
(paraffinic or naphthenic stocks) as a function of temperature
= 18286.83
301 = 516.04
= 140 64 = 76
= 64 60 = 4
= 18286.83
(647.56
+ 1.86.
76)
TUBE SIDE
= + = 4485638.1
= 43 30 = 13
= =
= =
43 + 30
= 36.5
2
= .
4485638.1
36.5 1
DE-SUPERHEAT
CONDENSATION
= 140 43 = 97
= 64 39.66 = 24.44
= 32.83
= 8.78
= 64 39.66 = 24.44
= 60 30 = 30
737592
=
= 22467.02
32.83
2152131
=
= 245117.4
8.78
= .
2889722.934
(22467.02 + 245117.4)
R=T
in
Thot out
in
= 6.15
CORRECTED LMTD
( )
S=
(+ + )
(++ + )
in
Tcold
in
in
= 0.12
= .
= 12.44 0.935 = .
Q
2889722.934
= .
=
Ud LMTDweighted
800 2 10.44
Length
L = 4.57 m
Outside Diameter
do = 0.0254 m (1 inch)
Thickness
= 0.0027686 (12 BWG)
ii
Tube Pitch
PT = 0.03176 m (1 inch)
Tube Clearance c = PT - Do = 0.00636 m
Pitch Type
= Triangular
Number of Tube Passes NP = 2
Baffle Spacing
B = 10 in
Outside Surface Area per linear m = 0.024332
A
9.558 2
=
= 350
(a )(L) (0.02433 2 )(4.57 )
RECOVERY OF NAPHTHA FROM CRUDE OIL | SLAM
Q
2889722.934
=
A LMTDweighted 121.94 2 10.44
= . /
The equivalent diameter for triangular pitch is calculated from (Kern 1950) Page 139 | Eq.
(7.5)
De = 4
2T 0.86 PT
do
do 2
0.0318 m
2
0.86(0.0318 m)
3.140.0254
= .
3.14(0.0254 m)2
SHELL SIDE
TUBE SIDE
cT BDS
PT
0.0064 0.25 0.686
aS =
0.0318
aT = n di 2
4
3.14
aT = 334
(0.019944 )2
4
aS =
= .
= .
TUBE SIDE
mS 11.49064
GS =
=
aS
0.0353212 2
mT 54.248315
GT =
=
aT
0.0516434 2
= .
= /
= .
ReS =
TUBE SIDE
De GS
S
0.01829 m 325.31858
0.0000304
ReS =
ReT =
ReT =
1031.07686
G di
T
0.019944m
0.0076155
ReT =
TUBE SIDE
hi = 4601.815
k c 3
W
ho = j = 425.411 2
m .
De k
hio = hi
m2 .
ID
W
= 3612.592 2
m .
OD
Condensation Loading
= 0.65 = 3.105
Assume ho = 1400
G =
= 84.2928
..
L(Nt )23
m2 .
ho
(T Ta ) = 43.44
ho + hio v
Tw = Ta +
Tf =
At Tf = 52.444,
(Tv + Tw )
= 52.444
2
Conductivity k = 0.086.
.
Sp. Gravity = 0.7
Viscosity = 0.5 cP
From (Kern) Page 267 | Fig. (12.9) Condensing coefficients
ho = 1474.76
m2 .
CONDENSING ZONE
Ud =
hio ho
W
= 380.601 2
m .
hio + ho
Uc =
ho hio
ho + hio
= 1047.0788
m2 .
U =
UAc
W
= 826.43 2
m .
Ac
Uc Ud
m2 .
= 0.0002
Uc Ud
Ad =
CONDENSING ZONE
qd
= 38.29572
Ud t d
Ac =
qc
= 77.4652
Uc t c
A = Ad + Ac = 115.62
Pressure drop along tube side is calculated by (Kern) Page 148 | Eq. (7.45)
Pt =
fG2 Ln
5.22E10 Ds
Pt = 1.013 psi
4n v 2
s 2g
Pr = 1.419
PT = Pt + Pr = 2.413 psi
CONDENSING ZONE
From (Kern) Page 147 | Eq. (7.44)
Ps =
fGs 2 (N + 1)
5.22E10 De s
P =
= 1.61
1 fGs 2 Ds (N + 1)
2 5.22E10 De s
= 0.51
P = Ps + Pc = 2.12
E-309
Overhead Condenser
Shell & Tube Condenser [Total]
114 Triangular
Cast Iron
826.43
115.6
0.0002
6.5 REBOILER:
Reboiler is a vaporizing exchanger used to supply the heat requirement of a distillation
process as vapors at the bottom of distillation column.
Kettle Reboiler
Vertical Thermosyphon Reboiler
Horizontal Thermosyphon Reboiler
Internal Reboiler
ADVANTAGES:
1. Relatively easy to design.
2. Simple pipinag.
DISADVANTAGES:
1. Not suitable for foaming liquids
2. Not suitable for fouling liquids
3. They have relatively lower heat transfer coefficients.
ADVANTAGES:
1. Higher heat transfer coefficient.
2. Used for fouling liquids.
DISADVANTAGES:
1. Require higher head room.
2. Design procedure is slightly difficult as compared to Kettle Reboiler.
ADVANTAGES:
1. No head room is required.
2. Easily maintained than vertical.
DISADVANTAGES:
1. More complex pipe-work
2. Requires large plot area
3. High structural costs
ADVANTAGES:
1. No ground area separately required.
2. Low capital cost.
DISADVANTAGES:
1. Does not give sufficient heat transfer area to fulfill the requirement.
301 = 385.5 F
301 . = 449.5 F
Density of Fluid
S = 582.84
kg/m3
T = 722.04
kg/m3
Viscosity
S = 0.00035
kg/ms
T = 0.00052
kg/ms
Thermal Conductivity
kS = 0.14127
W/mK
kT = 0.11850
W/mK
Specific Heat
cp,S = 2900.61
Fouling Factor
RdO = 0.00018
J/kg K
cp,T = 2739.90
J/kg K
m2 K / W
Rdi = 0.00035
m2 K / W
T1 T2
T
ln T1
2
= 20
U . LMTD
= 39.7 2
Length
Outside Dia
Thickness
L
do
=
=
=
7m
0.0254 m (1 inch)
0.0027686 (12 BWG)
Tube Pitch
PT
Tube Clearance c = PT - Do
Pitch Type
Number of Tube Passes NP
Segmental Baffle
Baffle Spacing
B
=
=
=
=
=
=
n=
AHT
=
aST
NT 71
=
=
NP
2
DH = 4
PT
0.86 PT
do
do 2
= .
SHELL SIDE
aS =
TUBE SIDE
cT BDS
PT
aT = n di 2
4
aS = .
aT = .
qT
= .
aT
+ , +
= 1595.39
, +
Which is very close to the assumed value of U* Hence accept this design.
CHAPTER # 7
INSTRUMENTATION &
CONTROL
7.1.1 INSTRUMENT
An instrument is a device that measures and/or regulates process variables such as flow,
temperature, level, or pressure. Instruments include many varied contrivances which can be
as simple as valves and transmitters, and as complex as analyzers. Instruments often comprise
control systems of varied processes such as refineries, factories, and vehicles.
7.1.2 CONTROL
The control of processes is one of the main branches of applied instrumentation.
Instrumentation can also refer to handheld devices that measure some desired variable and
7.2 OBJECTIVES
The primary objectives of the designer when specifying instrumentation and control schemes
are:
7.2.4 COST
To operate at the lowest production cost, commensurate with the other objective. These are
not separate objectives and must be considered together.
Temperature measurement
Pressure measurement
Flow rate measurement
Level measurement
7.3.4 CONTROLLER
The controller is the mechanism that responds to any error indicated by the error detecting
mechanism. The output of the controller is some predetermined function of the error. In the
controller there is also an error-detecting mechanism which compares the measured variables
with the desired value of the measured variable, the difference being the error.
On-off Control
Proportional Control
Integral Control
Rate or Derivative Control
7.6.4 CONTROLLER
Proportional integral controller
HAZOP STUDY | 91
CHAPTER # 8
HAZARD OPERABILITY
HAZOP STUDY | 92
8. HAZARD OPERABILITY
8.1 HISTORY & APPLICATION
HAZOP was initially instigated by Dr H G Lawley and associates of ICI at Wilton in the
United Kingdom in the 1960s. Subsequently, C J Bullock and A J D Jenning from ChE
Dept. Teesside Polytechnic under supervision of T.A. Kletz applied the method at higher
institution (post-graduate level). In 1977, Chemical Industries Association published the
edited version. Later on it was used by ICI, and the use of checklists was also promoted.
The technique gained popular acclaim within the chemical industries after the Fix Borough
disaster, which resulted in the deaths of 28 people owing to a chemical plant explosion many of the deceased were ordinary house holders living nearby. Through the general
exchange of ideas and personnel, the system was adopted by the petroleum industries, which
has a similar potential of major disasters. This was then followed by the food and water
industry, where the hazard potential is as great, but of a different nature, the concern being
more to do with contamination rather than explosions or chemical release.
8.2 INTRODUCTION
HAZOP has been used and develop for decades in order to identify the potential hazard and
operability problems caused by deviation from the design intent of both the new and existing
process plants. Before going further, it is best to clarify some aspects of these statements.
The concept of HAZOP involves investigating how the plant might deviate from the design
intent. If, in the process of identifying problems during a HAZOP study, a solution becomes
apparent, it is recorded as part of the HAZOP result; however, care must be taken to avoid
trying to find solutions which are not so apparent, because the prime objective for the
HAZOP is problem identification. Although the HAZOP study was developed to enhance a
new designs experience-based practices, its use has several dimensions, with experts
belonging to different backgrounds interacting and identifying more problems when working
together than when working separately and combining their results.
8.2.1 HAZARD
A hazard is defined as any operation that could possibly cause a release of toxic, flammable
or explosive chemicals or any action that could result in injury to personal or harm to the
environment.
8.2.2 OPERABILITY
Operability can be defined as any operation inside the design envelope that would cause a
shutdown that could possibly lead to a violation of environmental, health or safety regulations
or negatively impact profitability.
HAZOP STUDY | 93
PROCESS HAZOP
HUMAN HAZOP
PROCEDURE HAZOP
SOFTWARE HAZOP
HAZOP STUDY | 94
HAZOP studies may also be used more extensively, including:
Modes of operation
Normal operation
Start -up mode
Shutdown mode
Maintenance /construction / inspection mode
Human failure
Equipment /instrument/component failure
Supply failure
Emergency environment event
Trigger events
HAZOP STUDY | 95
Other causes of abnormal operation, including
instrument disturbance
Effects within plant
Hazardous conditions
Contingency actions
HAZOP STUDY | 96
the fact that the end objective of a HAZOP survey is to identify hazards; solutions to
problems are a separate effort.
HAZOP STUDY | 97
Various forms and work sheets have been developed to help organize the node process
parameters and control logic information.
When the nodes and parameters are identified, each node is studied by applying the
specialized guide words to each parameter. These guide words and their meanings are
thought to be the key elements of the HAZOP procedure.
The key words are divided into two subsets.
Pressure
Composition
Separate
Temperature
Level
Corrode
React
Remembering that the technique is called Hazard and Operability studies, added to the above
might be relevant operational words such as:
Isolate
Drain
Inspect
Maintain
Vent
Purge
Start up
Shut down
Meaning
Explanation
No
Less
Quantitative decrease
More
quantitative increase
HAZOP STUDY | 98
Part of
quantitative decrease
As well as
quantitative increase
Reverse
Other
Complete substitution
Time
Sequence
Procedure
Measurement
Organization
Communication
Personal
Position
Power
Weather
Repeated cycling through this process, which considers how and why each parameter might
differ from the intended and the consequence, is an integral part of the HAZOP study.
HAZOP STUDY | 99
The HAZOP studies are time consuming and expensive. Just getting the P & ID's up to date
on an older plant may be a major engineering effort. For processes with significant risk, they
are cost effective when balanced against the potential loss of life, property, business, and
even the future of the enterprise that may result from a major release.
Even though considerable man-hours are spent on the study, it must be kept in mind that
HAZOP Report is a key document pertaining to the safety of the plant. It is crucial that the
benefit of this study is easily accessible and comprehensible for future reference in case the
need arises to alter the plant or its operating conditions.
The major part of such a report is of course the printed Minutes, which contains the team
members, meeting dates, keywords applied, and of course every detail of the study teams
findings. However, it is usual to include with this a general summary. The contents of such a
summary might typically be:
An outline of the terms of reference and scope of the study.
A very brief description of the process which was studied.
The procedures and protocol employed. The Keyword combinations applied
should be listed, together with the explanatory meanings given to the team at the start
of the study. Also the fact that Action Sheets have been produced and responses will
be recorded should be explained. A brief description of the Action File (described in
the following section) should be included.
General comments. If, for example, the team were assured that high point vents and
low point drains would be universally provided, mention that statement and its
source. If certain details of vendor packages were not available, explain and list the
items which were not reviewed.
Results. This usually states the number of recommended actions.
Also included in the HAZOP Report would be an Appendix containing:
o Master copies of the drawings studied
o Copies of technical data used.
o Cause and Effect charts (i.e. matrices showing the executive action of safety
related instruments and trips).
o Any calculations produced.
o Relevant correspondence between departments, from contractor to vendor, or
client to contractor.
Deviation
Cause
Consequences
Safeguard
Action
DEVIATION
These are departures from the intention which are discovered by systematically applying the
guide words (e.g. more pressure).
CAUSE
Causes are the reasons why deviations might occur. Once a deviation has been found to have
a credible cause, it can be treated as a meaningful deviation. These causes can be hardware
failures, human errors, an unanticipated process state (e.g., change of composition), external
disruptions (e.g. loss of power), etc.
CONSEQUENCES
Consequences are the results of the deviations should they occur (e.g. release of toxic
materials). Trivial consequences, which are relative to the study objective, are dropped.
There are two outlets from which a consequence can arise: 1) from the effect of the deviation,
e.g. loss of dosing results in complete separation; 2) from the cause itself, e.g. cavitation in
pumps, with possible damage if prolonged.
SAFEGUARDS
Safeguards are usually any existing protective devices, which either prevent the cause, or
safeguards against the adverse consequences. For example, you may consider recording,
Local pressure gauge in discharge from pump might indicate problem was arising. Note
that safeguard needs not to be restricted hardware where appropriate credit can be taken for
procedural aspects, such as regular plants inspections.
ACTION
If a credible cause results in a negative consequence, it must be decided whether some action
should be taken. Consequences and associated safeguards are also considered at this stage. If
it is deemed that the protective measures are adequate, then no action should be taken, and
words to that effect are recorded in the action column. Actions fall in two groups:
Action that removes the cause
Action that mitigates or eliminates the consequences
Always examine removing the cause first, and only where necessary alleviate the
consequences. In the end, always take into account the label of training experience, especially
of personnel who will operate the plant. If operators do not understand how actions, which
require elaborate and sophisticated protective systems, are to be performed; actions are
wasted. It is not unknown for devices to be disabled, either deliberately or in error, because
no one knows for sure how to maintain and calibrate them. Having gone through the
operations involved in recording a single deviation, these can now be put into the context of
the actual study meeting procedure. From the flow diagram below it can be seen that it is very
much an iterative process, applying in a structured and systematic way the relevant keyword
combinations in order to recognize potential problems.
RECOVERY OF NAPHTHA FROM CRUDE OIL | SLAM
8.6 CONCLUSIONS
HAZOP Results:
8.7 ADVANTAGES
Systematic examination.
Multidisciplinary study.
Utilizes operational experience.
Covers safety as well as operational aspects.
Solutions to the problems identified may be indicated.
Considers operational procedures.
Covers human errors.
Study led by independent person.
Results are recorded
Cause:
Consequence:
Exchanger outlet
discharge SDV
closes.
Low pressure on
shell side
Tube ruptures
No significance
effect as system
remains within the
design limits
Tube may over
pressurize, but since
shell and tube are
designed at same
pressure hence no
significant effect is
there.
Action
Recommended:
High pressure
security must be
installed on shell
outlet which if
actuated will close all
SDVs.
Not available
High pressure
security must be
installed on tube
outlet which if
actuated will close all
SDVs.
Temperature
Tube side high
temperature
Flow
No flow on shell side
High temperature
security must be
there that will close
tube side SDVs.
Low flow security to
be installed on pump
discharge which if
actuated will trip
feed pump and can
trip the whole plant.
Raw Crude
Oil Storage
Tank
Deviations
from
operating
conditions
Consequences of
this deviation on
Process indications
item of equipment
under consideration
Pump cavitates
Level:
Less
LIA-1,
FICA-1
Oil released
LIA-1,
FICA-1
More
Oil released
LIA-1
Oil released
LIA-1
Oil released
LIA-1
Tank overfills
LIA-1
Tank overfills
LIA-1
More
Pressure:
Less
Oil released
External fire
Tank fails
Potential fire
PICA-1
Tank implodes
PICA-1
Tank implodes
PICA-1
PICA-1
Same as less
No
PICA-1
PICA-1
PICA-1
PICA-1
CHAPTER # 9
ENVIRONMENT IMPACT
ASSESSMENT
Since hydrogen sulfide is heavier than air, which can result in the gas settling in low places
near the vicinity where it is released, plant personnel should never knowingly vent any
appreciable quantity of 2 containing gas to the atmosphere without burning it. No work
should be undertaken on the unit when there is danger of breathing excessive2 , and no one
should ever or remain in such an area unless wearing a suitable gas mask.
Hydrogen Sulphide is highly toxic, colorless gas heavier than air with the odor of rotten eggs.
It burns with a blue flame and produces sulfur dioxide, a very irritating gas with a pungent
odor. It forms explosive mixtures with air, the lower limit of complete flammability being 4.3
percent hydrogen sulfide and the upper limit 46.0 percent. It is soluble in water but becomes
less soluble as the temperature of the water increases. The sense of smell cannot be depended
upon to detect hydrogen sulfide for two reason s. First, the sense of smell is lost in two to
Chances of
Recovery
98 out of 100
92 out of 100
72 out of 100
50 out of 100
25 out of 100
11 out of 100
8 out of 100
5 out of 100
2 out of 100
10
1 out of 100
CHAPTER # 10
COST ESTIMATION
10.5 COST
COST
Heat Exchanger
Heater
Pump
= $ 52500 (1,287.3/1,344.7)
= 8 $50258.97
= $ 402071.76
= $76500 (2,785.5/2,601.4)
= 5 $81913.87
= $409569.36
= $27900 (1,019.3/974.6)
= 1 $29179.63
= $29179.63
= $32400 (2,010.9/1,758.4 1)
= 11 37052.31
= $407575.41
RECOVERY OF NAPHTHA FROM CRUDE OIL | SLAM
Separating Vessel
Fractional Column
= $115230 (2,785.5/2,601.4)
= 3 123384.77
= $370154.31
= $148209.25
= $80000 (2,785.5/2,601.4)
= $85661.56
= $40000 (2,785.5/2,601.4)
= $ 4283.78
Reboiler
= 10%
= 12%
=
= +
5 %( + ) =
10 %( + ) =
= 0.10 1708495.81
= $170849.58
= 0.12 1708495.81
= $205019.49
= $375869.07
= $1718498.81
= 0.05 1718498.81
= $85924.94
= 0.10 1718498.81
= $171849.881
Purchased Equipment Cost = E
COMPONENTS
% of E
Purchased-equipment installation
25%
11%
Piping(Installed)
12%
Electrical (installed
9%
6%
Yard improvement
4%
Service Facilities(installed)
8%
Land
3%
=D
COMPONENTSS
% xE
Cost ($)
Purchased-equipment
installation
Instrumentation & Controls
(Installed)
0.25 $1708495.81
$427123.95
Piping(Installed)
Electrical (installed
0.12 $51708495.81
$205019.49
Building (Including
Service)
Yard improvement
0.06 $1708495.81
Service Facilities(installed)
Land
Total Direct Cost
0.11 $1708495.81
0.09 $1708495.81
0.04 $1708495.81
0.08 $1708495.81
0.03 $1708495.81
$.
$187934.53
$153764.62
$102509.74
$68339.83
$136679.66
$51254.87
= +
= 0.15 ( )
= 0.15( +
= 1966270.58
= (1966270.58/. 85)
= $2313259.506
RECOVERY OF NAPHTHA FROM CRUDE OIL | SLAM
Assume 15%
Therefore Total Product cost (TPC) = 269379.05/0.15 =
$1795860.33
0.3 1795860.33
$538758.099
0.14 1795860.33
$251420.44
0.10 1795860.33
. 13 1795860.33
0.06 1795860.33
0.14 1795860.33
0.101795860.33
0.04 1795860.33
= $1813817.89
$179586.03
$233461.84
$107751.61
$251420.44
$179586.03
$71834.41
0.50 1795860.33
$897930.16
0.20 1795860.33
$359172.06
R&D
0.03 1795860.33
$53875.80
= $1310978.03
= +
= 107751.61 + 1310978.03
= $ 1418729.64 = 120592019.4
320
= . 109 /
= /
= 575000 320 109
= . 1.288 1010
=
= (1.288 1010 120592019.4)
= . 1.275 1010
REFERENCES | 121
REFERENCES
Assaad, Magdi. Computerized Heat Exchanger Design Procedure. Concordia University
Libraries, 1979.
Cengel, Yunus. Thermodynamics - An Engineering Approach. 5th. Boston: McGraw-Hill,
2006.
Evans, Frank L. Equipment Design Handbook. 2nd. Vol. 2. Gulf Publishing Company, 1980.
Fouling Factors. n.d.
<http://www.engineeringpage.com/technology/thermal/fouling_factors.html#fouling_
factors>.
Kern, Donald Quentin. Process Heat Transfer. Tata McGraw-Hill Education, 1950.
Maxwell, J. B. Databook on Hydrocarbons. Malabar, Florida: Robert E. Krieger Publishing
Company, 1950.
Nelson, W.L. Petroleum Refinery Engineering. 4th. McGraw Hill Book Company, 1958.
Perry, Robert. Chemical Engineers Handbook. 7th. 2007.
Phillips, S. L. A Technical Databook for Geothermal Energy Utilization. Lawrence Berkeley
Laboratory, University of California, 1981.
Riazi, M. R. Characterization and Properties of Petroleum Fractions. 1st. ASTM
International, 2005.
Richardson, Coulson &. Particle Technology & Separation Processes. 5th. Vol. 2nd. Elsevier
Science, 2002.
Technical Data Book - Petroleum Refining. 6th Ed. American Petroleum Institute, 1997.
Timerhaus, Max. S Peters & Klaus D. Plant Design & Economics for Chemical Engineers.
4th. McGraw Hill, 1984.
"Using VSEP to Treat Desalter Effluent." 2003. New Logic Research Inc.
Watkins, Robert N. Petroleum Refinery Distillation. Houston, Texas: Gulf Publishing
Company, 1979.