Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
http://www.awakeningheart.com.au/index.php?page=transperso...
Frontpage
Awakening Heart
Transpersonal Gestalt
Field Theory
Paradoxical Theory
Shame
Attachment Theory
Transpersonal
Peak Experience
Meditation
Spirit & Neuropsychology
Non Duality
Spirit
Psychotherapy
Social Action
Downloads
|AWAKENINGHEART|GESTALT|THERAPY|SPIRIT|NEWS|GALLERY|CONTACT|LINKS|
GESTALT / Transpersonal Gestalt
THE TRANSPERSONAL
There are those within the Gestalt community who say Gestalt is humanist and irreligious, while others say it is
transpersonal in nature. Though Humanist psychotherapy is not mutually exclusive of transpersonal psychology, these
two views reflect differing poles in the community of Gestalt theorists. Fritz Perls was known to be anti religious, and
distanced himself even from Zen, saying all religions were man made crudities. Jeffrey John Kripal 2007
Claudio Naranjo puts this into perspective:
'That Gestalt therapy is commonly regarded as humanistic rather than transpersonal is a reflection of this lack of
conceptual precision, though a most understandable one if we consider that the spirituality of Gestalt therapy is, in a
sense, disguised. With this "in a sense" I refer to Perls' rejection of ordinary religiosity. C. Naranjo 1978
Fritz became disillusioned with Zen. One of Fritzs most often quoted blurbs involves his memories of visiting Zen
monasteries in Japan. This kind of meditation, Fritz insisted, was a form of constipation. Its like sitting on the pot:
one just sits there, neither shitting, nor getting off. Jeffrey John Kripal 2007
He then took refuge again in existentialism, an early secular influence on Gestalt Therapy. In spite of this, Fritz had
integrated a number of essential Zen Buddhist ideas and practices into Gestalt. Zen influence was joined by Taoist:
Fritzs religion of no religion also strongly resembled a kind of psychologised Taoism. Jeffrey John Kripal 2007
Some Zen parallels with Gestalt are, a confidence in the practice of being in the present as a healing agent, the Aha
moment and mini Satories as significant stages of growth, and the primacy of Awareness as our real nature. Perls
stated: Awareness in and of itself can be curative. Jeffrey John Kripal 2007
1 of 6
11/9/11 9:34 AM
http://www.awakeningheart.com.au/index.php?page=transperso...
ESALEN
After setting up court at Esalen in 1964, Fritz attracted a large entourage. Among them were two men who he later
regarded as his heirs, Dick Price, and Claudio Naranjo. Price was at Esalen before Perls and
Although initially suspicious of Perls when he arrived, Price decide to enter therapy with him, found the experience
helpful, and soon embraced Gestalt as one of his main spiritual practices, along with Buddhist meditation and
..psychadelics.
Jeffrey John Kripal 2007
Price inherited Fritzs mantle as leader of the West Coast Gestalt movement at Esalen when Fritz passed on and brought
a gentler way to it.
Those who knew Price best,..have all commented extensively on the incredible space or broad field that he seemed
to inhabit while he worked with people. Price accessed a spiritual dimension of consciousness that was grounded in the
experience of the basic interconnectedness of all existence.
Jeffrey John Kripal 2007
This reflects aspects of the Presence of awareness that I have as an ideal, openness, spaciousness, non-duality and
interconnectedness. Price used the phrase Gestalt Practice.
2 of 6
11/9/11 9:34 AM
http://www.awakeningheart.com.au/index.php?page=transperso...
I-THOU
Another profound influence on the formation of Gestalt Therapy was the thought of Martin Buber, a German Jewish
philosopher and mystic. The notions of I-thou, dialogue, realisation and inclusion were integrated into the foundations of
Gestalt early on, probably by Lora Perls, Fritzs partner and co-author of Ego, Hunger and Aggression.
Inclusion, according to Buber, means the ability to develop a dual sensation among those engaged in dialogue:
experiencing oneself and simultaneously perceiving the other in its singularity. The inclusion of a person causes one to
know ones fellow human being both physically and spiritually, in the Biblical sense of knowing a lover. Buber
illustrates this two-fold sensation of inclusion with an erotic metaphor: a man who caresses a woman who lets herself
be caressed, unexpectedly senses the contact from both sidesthrough the palm of his hand, and through the womans
skin. This two-fold event occurring between two human beings is the actualization of love, which is the expression of
responsibility of the I for the Thou.
Kalman Yaron 1993
This I-Thou stance is not unique but makes relations with the other, predominately our fellow humans, the prime focus
of his philosophy.
The experience of dialogue and I-Thou is similar to Zen Dokusan, where teacher and student meet intimately and knit
eyebrows in realisation. And of course the notion of the fertile void is classic Zen teaching. For Buber, the absolute
I-Thou, is God, but all else is between humans. There is no self without other(humans). This differs, on the surface,
with most eastern though which could be said as, There is no separate self, of individual and environment. In this
environment, human relations are implied, but as part of the totality of experience. From my predominately eastern
3 of 6
11/9/11 9:34 AM
http://www.awakeningheart.com.au/index.php?page=transperso...
perspective, I do not see such a distinction between the eastern understanding of self and a view of the self like
Bubers. The above quote with the metaphor of lovers reminds me of one of Nisargadattas:
I find that somehow, by shifting the focus of attention, I become the very
thing I look at, and experience the kind of consciousness it has; I become
the inner witness of the thing. I call this capacity of entering other
focal points of consciousness, love; you may give it any name you like.
Nisargadatta 1982
But Buber was a theist and Zionist, and the absolute Thou, was for him the God of the old testament. Regardless of the
differences between Bubers I-Thou and eastern thought, I-Thou is definitely a transpersonal point of view, and shows
one of Gestalts original transpersonal in the interpersonal influences.
..if the morality of Gestalt therapy is one of authenticity and nonmanipulation (of self or other), its awareness training
may be summed up in the statement that J.S. Slmkin proposed as a capsule definition of the approach: "I and thou,
here and now." In other words, it is a practice of awareness in relationship"
C. Naranjo 1978
AWARENESS
Perls spiritual outlook is shown by the central place he gave to awareness. Some would disagree with this, and on
the surface, awareness may not seem to have anything to do with spirituality.
But,
The fact, however, is that awareness is transpersonal. Or, to use the earlier term, spiritual. The most articulate
spiritual traditions make this very clear. Buddhahood (from the root bodh,"awake") is not a particular state or content of
the mind, but mind as such, the container. C. Naranjo 1978
And from Perls:
..Fritz could get even more metaphysical. In his autobiography.. he is quite clear that everything is awareness, and
that even matter and molecules have some quantum of consciousness.
Jeffrey John Kripal 2007
I too place awareness at the centre of my world view, though the word awareness has many connotations for me that
would be unknown to, or not shared by all. I see Gestalt as the practice of interpersonal presence. Presence is
synonymous with awareness for me, and that is one of the connotations of awareness that I have, that in essence, it is
pure presence, and the practice of this presence as a therapist, I believe, is both therapeutic and spiritual. This presence
is I-thou in the fullest sense. When he says everything is awareness, to me Fritz implies awareness as ground of
being, and the ground of all phenomena. The subject-object split dissolves in pure presence. This is also known as
non-dual awareness. I have learnt that awareness has a primacy in the Gestalt understanding of dis-ease and its
treatment. Naranjo here expresses in a nutshell the importance of awareness in its therapeutic context: Precisely
because the manipulative and inauthentic behavior characteristic of the neurotic modes of being-in-the-world involve an
attempt to avoid certain experiences, the attitude of the therapist is to invite an undoing of such avoidances, a "staying
with it," however painful or confusing. In Perls' view, our awareness is constricted because we have not accepted our
suffering C. Naranjo 1978
4 of 6
11/9/11 9:34 AM
http://www.awakeningheart.com.au/index.php?page=transperso...
PRESENCE
An aspect of the Presence of awareness is its void essence, like space, it is empty, and like space, is all pervading. This
Presence is known as
unconditional Presence by John Welwood 1996
Raw Presence by Jim Valby 2007
Instant Presence by Chogyal Namkhai Norbu 2009
Chogyal Namkhai Norbu says that the essence of Instant Presence is infinite potentiality, a similar expressing to the
fertile void. This presence of awareness does not have the same meaning as presence does in Gestalt. It does however
encompass the Gestalt meaning.
Gary Yontev describes Gestalts understanding of presence thus: "Presence. The Gestalt therapist expresses herself to
the patient. Regularly, judiciously, and with discrimination she expresses observations, preferences, feelings, personal
experience and thoughts. Thus, the therapist shares her perspective by modeling phenomenological reporting, which
aids the patient's learning about trust and use of immediate experience to raise awareness. If the therapist relies on
theory-derived interpretation, rather than personal presence, she leads the patient into relying on phenomena not in his
own immediate experience as the tool for raising awareness. In Gestalt therapy the therapist does not use presence to
manipulate the patient to conform to preestablished goals, but rather encourages patients to regulate themselves
autonomously." G. Yontev 1989
Buddhist presence is the ground of being or greater field which encompasses all phenomena. It is empty in essence but
its nature is radiant awareness and phenomena spontaneously arise within this field as its energy. This is meant as
both the true nature of the individual and the all pervading nature of everything. So being in a state of pure presence is
being in tune with the Buddha nature. From this space, a therapist has all the qualities needed for an I-Thou meeting
with the other person. John Welwood speaks of an esoteric practice of self-liberation from the Dzogchen tradition and
how it can enhance therapy. In pure presence, awareness is self illuminating, or aware of itself without objectification.
Psychotherapy a dialogic process is essentially reflective, although when practiced by a therapist with a contemplative
background, it can also include moments of nonreflective presence that facilitate a shift into a deeper dimension of
being. J. Welwood 2000
I see Gestalt as the practice of interpersonal presence. Presence is synonymous with awareness for me, and that is one
of the connotations of awareness that I have, that in essence, it is pure presence, and the practice of this presence as a
therapist, I believe, is both therapeutic and spiritual. This presence is I-thou in the fullest sense. When he says
everything is awareness, to me Fritz implies awareness as ground of being, and the ground of all phenomena. The
subject-object split dissolves in pure presence. Presence is also known as non-dual awareness.
What this can look like in practice is, with the therapists presence, the figure in the clients experience is explored
together respectfully. The client feels met and understood, their experience validated and accepted. The figure and its
context, its ground are illuminated and the client may be able to make meaning of their situation. To give an example
from my limited experience as therapist, I was being therapist for a young woman who had never done therapy before.
She bravely volunteered to be a client at our training clinic. She presented as a cheerful and charming and attractive
young lady, who had quite a high degree of self honesty. She had come along on the invitation of a friend who is a
student at SGI. After greeting each other, I enquired if there was anything she wanted to work on in our session. She
said she had difficulty in social situations because she felt she did not have anything worthwhile to talk about. I invited
her to explore where that statement might have come from. I was more present than I ordinarily am as I had meditated
that morning and had just done a session as therapist, which honed my presence. My attitude was one of acceptance
and responsiveness to the client. I was listening attentively but responding in an intuitive manner, not premeditated but
yet drawing on all my experience of 4 years of training and so on. I think this helped allow her to come forth openly and
to quickly come to the figure which for her was a sense of pain that was in large part grounded in the rejection and
abandonment of her partner of 8 years, one year ago. She seemed to have doubts as to whether she would meet
anyone soon for a new relationship. As we explored where the critical voice might have come from that told her she had
nothing worthwhile to say, she realized straight away it was her ex who said things like, her job as a childcare worker
meant she had nothing interesting to say. He had been constantly critical of her. She had not been able to withstand this
and had been swallowing his critical words whole for years. I told her how I was feeling about what she was telling me.
Now I realize I was intuitively practicing inclusion. I said I was angry. At first she didnt understand where I was coming
from. Then I told her I felt angry at her ex for the way he had spoken to her. She began crying. She had not realized
that the way she had been treated was unacceptable to others. The figure of her self perception as having nothing
worthwhile to bring to conversations had a context of many years of low level emotional abuse. This was the ground
which through our exploration she was able to connect with her perception of unworthiness. She was able to question
her own belief and change her perception. No doubt it was only planting the seed, but I feel sure she would have begun
to change her sense of herself about this mater and more generally. I enquired about her occupation as a childcare
worker and she told me how much joy it gave her. As another example of inclusion I shared with her my work with
people with disabilities and how much I enjoyed it. I told her I really enjoy the presence of children and how much I
valued what she does, how important it is to their development to have adult carers who delight in, and value them. Our
eyes met and we held a gaze for what seemed quite a while. That she was able to look straight back and hold her gaze
5 of 6
11/9/11 9:34 AM
http://www.awakeningheart.com.au/index.php?page=transperso...
meant to me that she trusted me and felt accepted beyond what she was used to. She confirmed this saying she felt
understood for the first time in a long time. My trainer was right there in the room but my attention was almost
exclusively on the client. Time seemed to stand still and our contact seemed beyond the ordinary. We could have
explored further back to see if her introjects had an earlier history but she did not seem to want to go in a direction
other than where we were and I continued to practice respecting what she was presenting to me and what she wanted
to explore. It felt very much like I-Thou, my strongest sense of this in my training as a therapist. It felt like a very real
and ordinary exchange and at the same time, to have a transcendent quality. The client reported very positively about
her first experience of therapy in feedback afterwards. I did not handle the session perfectly, but it seemed a very
powerful yet very human experience for both of us.
CONCLUSION
16 years ago I managed to break free of the bonds of active addiction to substances. Some years ago I acquired the
aspiration to work with addicts in recovery to share what I had learned in transcending the damage of addiction, and the
conditioning that had led me into addiction. I sought a path to follow this and looked at Alcohol and other Drug studies,
Counseling and Hakomi. What drew me to Gestalt was its closeness to Zen and other spiritual traditions and its field
theory, its values of living in the present with awareness. It held much excitement for me as a path to continue my
spiritual practice and benefit others. I look forward to practicing Gestalt in a way that helps others to awaken, as I am
also awakening with them.
Admin
6 of 6
11/9/11 9:34 AM