Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
AND
BACKGROUND Melasma is an acquired pigmentary disorder classically manifesting as symmetric hyperpigmented macules and patches on the face. It most commonly affects women of reproductive age with
darker skin tones but may also affect adolescents, older women, and men. Although its pathogenesis
remains unclear, known risk factors include ultraviolet radiation, hormonal variations of pregnancy, thyroid
disease, oral contraceptives, and antiseizure medications. Hydroquinone-containing topical agents are the
current standard for melasma treatment, but concern about side effects and long-term safety has spurred
efforts to develop alternative treatment options.
OBJECTIVES
MATERIALS AND METHODS MEDLINE was searched from 2006 to the present for randomized controlled
trials (RCTs) of melasma treatments.
RESULTS Nineteen published RCTs were found covering interventions such as topical therapies, chemical
peels, and electromagnetic devices. The outcomes of the studies were summarized into tabular form for
easy reference and comparison.
CONCLUSIONS Although melasma is difficult to treat, novel therapeutic modalities have emerged. Further
RCT need to be performed to better assess the safety and efficacy of these novel treatment modalities,
especially for the long-term maintenance of melasma.
Dr. Hantash holds stock in and serves as the Vice Chairman of Envy Medical, Inc., manufacturer of Lumixyl
cream, a non-hydroquinone-based skin lightening cream.
*Department of Dermatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California; Elixir Institute of
Regenerative Medicine, San Jose, California
2012 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
ISSN: 1076-0512 Dermatol Surg 2012;38:971984 DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2012.02435.x
971
972
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY
mixed.11 The epidermal pattern shows extra melanin deposits in the basal and suprabasal epidermal
layers, whereas the dermal pattern shows many
melanin-laden macrophages in the superficial dermis, often surrounding perivascular spaces. Mixed
melasma shows a combination of the two patterns.
There is a strong correlation between histologic
subtype and the gross appearance of the macules.16
The diagnosis of melasma depends primarily on
the clinical findings of the history and physical
examination. Woods lamp examination helps distinguish the histologic subtypes, although this
method is less reliable for darker skin types.11 Epidermal melasma normally appears light brown and
shows enhanced color contrast with Woods lamp
examination. Dermal melasma often appears
slightly grey or bluish on gross examination
because of the Tyndall effect, and with Woods
lamp shows less color contrast. Categorization of
the type of melasma is useful because it may help
guide treatment options and patient expectations
since dermal melasma is generally less responsive
to therapy, especially topical modalities.3135
Settings
38:7:JULY 2012
973
974
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY
R, DB,
C, SF
R, C
R, DB,
C, SF
R, C, SB
Khemis45
Cestari40
Hantash50
Chan41
A) HQ 4%,
retinoic acid 0.05%,
fluocinolone acetonide
0.01% QD
B) HQ 4%
BID, SPF 60
A) Oligopeptide
(decapeptide-12 0.01%)
BID
B) Vehicle BID
A) HQ 4%,
retinoic acid 0.05%,
fluocinolone acetonide
0.01% QD
B) HQ 4%
BID + SPF 30
A) Rucinol serum
0.3% BID
B) Vehicle BID + SPF 60
A) Liposome-encapsulated
4-n-butylresorcinol
(Rucinol) 0.1% cream BID
B) Vehicle BID + SPF
A) Arbutin 1% BID
B) Ellagic acid 1% BID
C) Plant extract, ellagic
acid 1% BID
Treatments Assessed
A) 129/121
B) 131/126
5/5
A) 60/60
B) 60/59
32/28
A) 10/10
B) 10/9
C) 10/10
23/23
No. Enrolled/No.
Completed
E, M, D
n/k
E, M
E, M
n/k
Type
Moderate
to severe
Moderate,
recalcitrant
Moderate,
severe
Moderate,
severe
n/k
n/k
Severity
IIV
IV
IIV
IIIV
IIIV
n/k
Fitzpatrick
Skin Type
8 weeks
16 weeks
8 weeks
12 weeks
6 months
8 weeks
Duration
Primary Outcome
Measurement and
Results
BID, twice a day; C, controlled; D, dermal; DB, double bind; E, epidermal; Hq, hydroquione; M, mixed; n/k, not known or not stated in study. QD, every day; R, randomized; SB,
single blind; SF, split face; SPF, sun protection factor.
R, DB,
C, SF
Ertam42
Huh
46
Author
Study
Type
Study
Type
R, C
R, C, SF
R, C, SF
R, SB
Author
Azzam55
Erbil48
Kodali54
Ilknur51
Garg52
A) Serial GA
peels (2070%)
B) Serial amino fruit acid
peels (2060%) SPF 30
A) Serial GA
peels (2060%)
B) +retinoic acid 0.025%
QHS
C) +HQ 2%
QHS SPF
A) TCA
20% peels*
B) Jessners solution
peels*
C) HQ 2% and
kojic acid QHS SPF 45
A) Serial GA
peels (2070%), topical
azelaic acid 20% BID,
adapalene 0.1% QID
B) Azelaic acid 20% BID,
adapalene 0.1% QID
SPF 15
A) Serial SA
peels (2030%) plus
HQ 4% BID
B) HQ 4% BID
SPF 30
Treatments Assessed
A) 20/15
B) 20/17
C) 20/18
31/24
20/18
A) 16/15
B) 12/10
A) 15/15
B) 15/15
C) 15/15
No. Enrolled/No.
Completed
E, M, D
E, M
Type
n/k
n/k
Moderate,
severe
Recalcitrant
n/k
Severity
IV/V
II/III/V
III/IV/V
n/k
III, IV
Fitzpatrick
Skin Type
6 months
6 months
8 weeks
20 weeks
68 weeks
Duration
38:7:JULY 2012
975
976
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY
A) Jessners solution
peels**
B) SA 30%
peels** + SPF 60 Both
groups applied 0.05%
retinoic acid QHS for
2 weeks before first peel
A) 34/32
B) 26/25
Fitzpatrick
Skin Type
Study
Type
Author
TABLE 4. Continued
Treatments Assessed
No. Enrolled/No.
Completed
Type
Severity
Duration
Study
Type
R, C,
SF
R, C,
SF, CO
Author
Trelles57
Wattanakrai59
Jeong58
TABLE 5. Lasers
A) HQ 4%,
retinoic acid 0.05%,
fluocinolone acetonide
0.01% QHS
B) Low-fluence QS-Nd:
YAG + SPF 50
A) HQ 5%,
retinoic acid 0.1%,
dexamethasone 0.1%
TID 9 5 days, BID 9 5,
QD 9 5 (modified
Kligmans)
B) CO2 fractional ablative
resurfacing*
C) CO2 fractional ablative
resurfacing and topical*
+ SPF 30 A and C
also applied kojic acid,
glycolic acid,
HQ 2% QD
after 15-day course of
topical therapy or
68 days after laser
treatment
A) Low-fluence QS-Nd:
YAG, HQ 2%
QHS
B) HQ 2%
QHS + SPF 60
Treatments
Assessed
13/13
22/22
A) 10/10
B) 10/10
C) 10/10
No. Enrolled/No.
Completed
n/k
D, M
E, M
Type
n/k
Recalcitrant
Mild,
moderate,
severe
Severity
III, IV
IIIV
IIIV
Fitzpatrick
Skin Type
16 weeks
7 weeks
12 months
Duration
MASI: A statistically
significantly greater
decrease was observed
for Group C than Groups
A and B (p < 0.001); crusting
experienced after laser
treatment in Groups
B and C took 68 days to
resolve
Primary Outcome
Measurement and Results
38:7:JULY 2012
977
978
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY
R, C,
SF, SB
R, SB
Goldman63
Kroon60
A) HQ 5%,
retinoic acid 0.05%, TA
0.1% QHS
B) 1,550-nm erbium glass
nonablative fractional
laser** + SPF > 50
A) HQ 4%,
retinoic acid 0.05%,
fluocinolone acetonide
0.01% QHS, IPL
B) Placebo, IPL + SPF 45
A) HQ 4%,
retinoic acid 0.05%,
triamcinolone acetonide
0.1% QD
B) Nonablative 1,550-nm
fractional laser + SPF 50
Treatments
Assessed
A) 10/10
B) 10/10
56/56
29/29
No. Enrolled/No.
Completed
E, M, D
n/k
E, M
Type
Moderate,
severe
Moderate,
severe
n/k
Severity
IIV
IIIV
IIV
Fitzpatrick
Skin Type
8 weeks
10 weeks
15 weeks
Duration
Primary Outcome
Measurement and Results
One treatment.
Five treatments, 1-week intervals.
R, C,
SB, SF
Study
Type
Wind61
Author
TABLE 5. Continued
biosynthetic pathway. Rucinol is a resorcinol derivative and has been shown to inhibit tyrosinase and
TRP-1.44 Khemis compared 0.3% rucinol serum
with vehicle twice a day for 12 weeks in a splitface trial of 32 patients and showed a statistically
significantly lower pigmentation score on the rucinol-treated side (p = 0.03).45 Huh tested a novel
0.1% liposome-encapsulated formula of rucinol in
a split-face study of 23 patients and demonstrated
a statistically significantly greater reduction in melanin index of the treatment side than of the vehicle-treated side after 8 weeks ( 7.5% vs 3.3%;
p = 0.04).46
Melanin index:
Decreased at Weeks
4 and 8 in the
treatment group
(p < 0.001); no statistical
change in placebo group
8 weeks
IIIV
Mild, moderate
A) Oral procyanidin
and vitamins A, C,
and E, BID
B) Oral placebo
BID + SPF 24
R, DB, C
Handog65
A) 30/27
B) 30/29
Duration
Severity
Treatments
Assessed
Study
Type
Author
TABLE 6. Other
No. Enrolled/No.
Completed
Type
Photo
Type
Primary Outcome
Measurement and Results
38:7:JULY 2012
979
980
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY
Device-Based Therapies
Carbon dioxide fractional ablative laser The carbon dioxide (CO2) laser is an ablative resurfacing
treatment that nonselectively destroys the epidermis. A fractionated approach decreases the amount
of epidermal injury and therefore results in fewer
side effects and less risk of dyspigmentation. It has
also been reported that the microscopic injury
zones induced by fractional treatments allow transport of necrotic epidermal debris including melanin
through a compromised dermoepidermal junction.56 Trelles treated 60 patients with epidermal
and mixed melasma with one fractional CO2 highpower, fixed-pulse-width, low-frequency setting
(10,600 nm, 11.3 J/cm2, 350 ns, 1 pass) with or
without a topical maintenance cream.57 Another
38:7:JULY 2012
981
Conclusion
Melasma is a disorder with significant psychological effects. The identification of some of the etiologic factors has provided some guidance for
preventative strategies such as strict photoprotection, but treating the condition remains difficult.
Although considered the standard, the use of HQbased topical agents has become controversial since
the U.S. FDA proposed banning over-the-counter
sales of HQ products in 2006. In addition to raising concern over case reports of exogenous ochronosis, the FDA expressed alarm over studies
performed in rodents indicating that HQ may be a
carcinogen.66 In response, arguments have been
made showing that the risk of ochronosis is low,
specifically in the 2% over-the-counter HQ formulations and when used properly under clinical surveillance.67,68 In December 2009, the Department
of Health and Human Services National Toxicology Program proposed 3 studies to investigate the
metabolism, reproductive toxicity, and carcinogenicity of HQ in rodents before the FDA finalizes its
decision.69 In light of this, the presence of novel,
safe, effective HQ-free skin lightening alternatives
is a critical addition to the armamentarium of dermatologists treating patients with melasma. We
reviewed 19 RCTs published since 2006 that
examined a variety of topical and device-based
treatments for melasma. The heterogeneity in
severity and type of melasma (when reported) and
the wide variety of interventions, treatment
protocols, and outcome measurements makes it
impossible to perform a reliable meta-analysis.
Additionally, most of the studies did not compare
or use HQ as the control; thus, we are unable to
rank any one treatment above another. This review
shows how novel compounds and laser technologies are evolving to meet the need to develop safe
and effective treatments for melasma. We expect
that, as further innovations are made and additional combination treatment protocols designed,
dermatologists will be better able to individualize
treatment to achieve greater efficacy while minimizing safety concerns.
982
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY
References
1. Kauh YC, Zachian TF. Melasma. Adv Exp Med Biol
1999;455:4919.
2. Ortonne JP, Arellano I, Berneburg M, Cestari T, et al. A global
survey of the role of ultraviolet radiation and hormonal
influences in the development of melasma. J Eur Acad Dermatol
Venereol 2009;23:125462.
3. Moin A, Jabery Z, Fallah N. Prevalence and awareness of
melasma during pregnancy. Int J Dermatol 2006;45:2858.
4. Vazquez M, Maldonado H, Benmaman C, Sanchez JL.
Melasma in men. A clinical and histologic study. Int J Dermatol
1988;27:257.
5. Freitag FM, Cestari TF, Leopoldo LR, Paludo P, et al. Effect of
melasma on quality of life in a sample of women living in
southern Brazil. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2008;22:
65562.
6. Pandya A, Berneburg M, Ortonne JP, Picardo M. Guidelines for
clinical trials in melasma. Pigmentation Disorders Academy. Br
J Dermatol 2006;156(Suppl 1):218.
7. Pawaskar MD, Parikh P, Markowski T, McMichael AJ, et al.
Melasma and its impact on health-related quality of life in
Hispanic women. J Dermatol Treat 2007;18:59.
8. Balkrishnan R, McMichael AJ, Camacho FT, Saltzberg F, et al.
Development and validation of a health-related quality of life
instrument for women with melasma. Br J Dermatol
2003;149:5727.
9. Rendon MI. Utilizing combination therapy to optimize melasma
outcomes. J Drugs Dermatol 2004;5(Suppl):S2734.
10. Failmezger C. Incidence of skin disease in Cuzco, Peru. Int J
Dermatol 1992;31:5601.
11. Sanchez NP, Pathak MA, Sato S, Fitzpatrick TB, et al.
Melasma: a clinical, light microscopic, ultrastructural, and
immunofluorescence study. J Am Acad Dermatol 1981;4:698
710.
12. Kang WH, Yoon KH, Lee ES, Kim J, et al. Melasma:
histopathological characteristics in 56 Korean patients. Br J
Dermatol 2002;146:22837.
13. Kang HY, Hwang JS, Lee JY, Ahn JH, et al. The dermal stem
cell factor and c-kit are overexpressed in melasma. Br J
Dermatol 2006;154:10949.
14. Imokawa G. Autocrine and paracrine regulation of melanocytes
in human skin and in pigmentary disorders. Pigment Cell Res
2004;17:96110.
15. Barker D, Dixon K, Medrano EE, Smalara D, et al.
Comparison of the responses of human melanocytes with
different melanin contents to ultraviolet B irradiation. Cancer
Res 1995;55:40416.
16. Grimes PE, Yamada N, Bhawan J. Light microscopic,
immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural alterations in patients
with melasma. Am J Dermatopathol 2005;27:96101.
17. Schauer E, Trautinger F, Kock A, Schwarz A, et al.
Proopiomelanocortin-derived peptides are synthesized and
released by human keratinocytes. J Clin Invest 1994;93:
225862.
18. Im S, Kim J, On WY, Kang WH. Increased expression of alphamelanocyte-stimulating hormone in the lesional skin of
melasma. Br J Dermatol 2002;146:1657.
39. Grimes PE, Bhawan J, Guevara IL, Colon LE, et al. Continuous
therapy followed by a maintenance therapy regimen with a
triple combination cream for melasma. J Am Acad Dermatol
2010;62:9627.
40. Ferreira Cestari T, Hassun K, Sittart A, de Lourdes Viegas M.
A comparison of triple combination cream and hydroquinone
4% cream for the treatment of moderate to severe facial
melasma. J Cosmet Dermatol 2007;6:369.
41. Chan R, Park KC, Lee MH, Lee ES, et al. A randomized
controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of a fixed triple
combination (fluocinolone acetonide 0.01%, hydroquinone 4%,
tretinoin 0.05%) compared with hydroquinone 4% cream in
Asian patients with moderate to severe melasma. Br J Dermatol
2008;159:697703.
42. Ertam I, Mutlu B, Unal I, Alper S, et al. Efficiency of ellagic
acid and arbutin in melasma: a randomized, prospective, openlabel study. J Dermatol 2008;35:5704.
43. Munoz-Munoz JL, Garcia-Molina F, Garcia-Molina M, Tudela
J, et al. Ellagic acid: characterization as substrate of polyphenol
oxidase. IUBMB Life 2009;61:1717.
44. Kim DS, Kim SY, Park SH, Choi YG, et al. Inhibitory effects of
4-n-butylresorcinol on tyrosinase activity and melanin synthesis.
Biol Pharm Bull 2005;28:22169.
46. Huh SY, Shin JW, Na JI, Huh CH, et al. Efficacy and safety of
liposome-encapsulated 4-n-butylresorcinol 0.1% cream for the
treatment of melasma: a randomized controlled split-face trial. J
Dermatol 2010;37:3115.
38:7:JULY 2012
983
63. Goldman MP, Gold MH, Palm MD, Colon LE, et al.
Sequential treatment with triple combination cream and intense
pulsed light is more efficacious than sequential treatment with
an inactive (control) cream and intense pulsed light in patients
with moderate to severe melasma. Dermatol Surg 2011;37:224
33.
64. Ni Z, Mu Y, Gulati O. Treatment of melasma with Pycnogenol.
Phytother Res 2002;16:56771.
56. Hantash BM, Bedi VP, Sudireddy V, Struck SK, et al. Laserinduced transepidermal elimination of dermal content by
fractional photothermolysis. J Biomed Opt 2006;11:041115.
58. Jeong SY, Shin JB, Yeo UC, Kim WS, et al. Low-fluence Qswitched neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser for
melasma with pre- or post-treatment triple combination cream.
Dermatol Surg 2010;36:90918.
59. Wattanakrai P, Mornchan R, Eimpunth S. Low-fluence Qswitched neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet
(1,064 nm) laser for the treatment of facial melasma in Asians.
Dermatol Surg 2010;36:7687.
60. Kroon MW, Wind BS, Beek JF, van der Veen JP, et al.
Nonablative 1550-nm fractional laser therapy versus
triple topical therapy for the treatment of melasma: a
randomized controlled pilot study. J Am Acad Dermatol
2011;64:51623.
61. Wind BS, Kroon MW, Meesters AA, Beek JF, et al. Nonablative 1,550 nm fractional laser therapy versus triple topical
therapy for the treatment of melasma: a randomized controlled
split-face study. Lasers Surg Med 2010;42:60712.
984
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY