Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Ratings
National
Long-Term Rating
AAA(lka)
Outlook
National Long-Term Rating
Stable
Financial Data
Dialog Axiata PLC (Consolidated)
30 Sep 12
(9 mths)
31 Dec 11
(12 mths)
41,526
111
45,637
152
34.8
37.9
8,610
15,966
3,193
5,907
40.79
44.38
25,782
28,863
Revenue (LKRm)
Operating EBITDAR
(USDm)
Operating EBITDAR
margin (%)
Funds from
operations (LKRm)
Free cash flow
(LKRm)
FFO gross interest
coverage (x)
Total debt with equity
credit (LKRm)
Gross adjusted
debt/EBITDAR
FFO net adjusted
leverage
LKR/USD month-end
1.34
1.67
1.59
1.10
129.7943
113.9013
Annaulised
Parent Linkages: Dialog Axiata PLCs (Dialog) AAA(lka) National Long-Term Rating factors
in Fitch Ratings expectations that its 83%-parent, Axiata Group Berhad (Axiata) of Malaysia, is
likely to extend support in extreme circumstances, if required. This is underpinned by strong
linkages including a common brand, board control, as well as Axiatas strategic and
operational involvement in Dialog. Support has been forthcoming in the past, and includes
corporate guarantees on debt, shareholder loans, and equity injections.
Strong Standalone Profile: Dialogs standalone profile has improved between 2010 and 2012,
helped by a more benign competitive environment and rising usage across most service
segments. This has led us to shift its standalone rating up by a notch, to AA+(lka). This is also
supported by Dialogs leading market share in mobile; evolving position in fixed-line, broadband,
and pay-TV; and its strong balance sheet.
Improving Balance Sheet: We expect Dialogs funds flow from operations (FFO) net adjusted
leverage to improve over the medium term, supported by positive free cash flow (FCF)
generation (after dividends and capex). However, sustained increases in FFO net adjusted
leverage over 1.75x (end-September 2012 (9M12): 1.59x annualised) and/or the EBITDAR
margin weakening below 30%, could lead to pressure on Dialogs standalone rating.
Stable Industry Outlook: Fitch has a stable outlook for the Sri Lankan telecoms industry for
2013, supported by relatively lower competition, with operators maintaining tariffs above the
regulatory floor of LKR1.50/outgoing minute on local calls to other networks. However, high
competition could persist within revenue segments that are not subject to floor tariffs such as
international calls, international roaming, and data as six operators compete for market share
among a 21 million population.
Industry Consolidation is Positive: We believe consolidation among Sri Lankan telecom
operators will be the key to reducing long-term industry risk.
Moderate Organic Revenue Growth: The agency expects high-single-digit growth in Dialogs
organic revenue in the medium-term, underpinned by increasing usage and a more benign tariff
environment. Group revenue increased by 24% yoy during 9M12 helped by a sharp 15%
weakening in the local exchange rate, which increased foreign-currency revenues in Sri Lankan
rupee terms and also due to the acquisition of Suntel, a fixed-line operator.
Suntels contribution to group revenue and EBITDA (4% on both counts in 9M12) should
increase in 2013 as its full-year results are consolidated. A lower reliance on mobile revenue
will improve Dialogs business risk over the long term.
Analysts
Hasira De Silva, CFA
+941 1254 1900
hasira.desilva@fitchratings.com
Nitin Soni
+65 6796 7235
nitin.soni@fitchratings.com
www.fitchratings.com
Weaker Linkages with Parent: A substantial dilution in Axiatas ownership or board control of
Dialog, removal of the common brand name, or a weakening of current operational or strategic
ties between the companies, could result in a downgrade.
31 January 2013
Corporates
Immediate Peer Group Comparative Analysis
Peer Group
Issuer
BBB
Globe Telecom, Inc.
BBB
PT XL Axiata Tbk
Country
Philippines
Indonesia
BB
Sri Lanka Telecom PLC Sri Lanka
National Outlook/
LT Rating Watch
8 Oct 12
6 Oct 11
8 Oct 10
2 Mar 09
5 May 08
20 Apr 07
5 Dec 06
3 Oct 05
AAA(lka)
AAA(lka)
AAA(lka)
AA(lka)
AAA(lka)
AAA(lka)
AAA(lka)
AAA(lka)
Stable
Stable
Stable
Negative
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Sector Characteristics
Operating Risks
Incumbent operators are generally exposed to market share erosion, especially in the highly
competitive mobile segment. Operators investing heavily in fibre-based data infrastructure may
run the risk of inadequate revenue growth and protracted repayment periods on investment.
Over the longer term, telecom operators in emerging markets run the risk of having their voice
revenue replaced by cheaper data- and IP-based services. The risk to operators with multiple
established service platforms from such a shift is lower.
Financial Risks
The key financial risk for an incumbent operator will be the inability to generate sufficient
operating cash flows to fund growing capex required to build out a robust network in terms of
capacity and coverage, as well as to keep abreast of changing technology. Profitability can also
suffer due to weakening growth in the fixed-wireless and wireline segments, as well as high
competition from an overcrowded industry.
Telcos with high cash reserves are better insulated against the risk of their operating cash
flows falling short of ongoing capex needs during periods of prolonged weak macroeconomic
performance. Such cash shortfalls may then require companies to increase leverage to meet
investments, increasing their financial risk, or fall back in terms of technology leadership.
Globe
XL
BBB / n.a. BBB / AAA(idn)
Stable
802
43.1
1.9
6.6
79
Stable
1,005
48.7
1.5
9.6
41
SLT
BB / AAA(lka)
Stable
149
33.7
1.0
21.3
-1
Dialog
n.a. /AAA(lka)
AA+(lka)
Stable
152
36.2
1.7
15.1
52
Overview of Companies
Statusa
Strong
Strong
Strong
Average
Weak
Trend
Neutral
Improving
Improving
Neutral
Neutral
Globe Telecom, Inc. (Globe, BBB/Stable) the Phillipines second-largest operator stands
to benefit from market consolidation in terms of a slower decline in profitability. Higher capex
and low flexibility to cut shareholder distributions will keep FCF negative in the short term.
PT XL Axiata Tbk (XL, BBB/Stable) Indonesias third-largest mobile operator. XLs strategic
importance to its parent Axiata Group Berhad (66.7% beneficial ownership) has resulted in its
rating being more closely aligned with its parent.
Sri Lanka Telecom PLC (SLT, BB/AAA(lka)/Stable) Sri Lankas incumbent fixed-line
operator with a strong share in mobile, and evolving broadband and pay-TV segments. SLTs
LC IDR of BB is constrained at the sovereign level, due to its majority state ownership.
Dialog Axiata PLC (Dialog, AAA(lka)/Stable) Sri Lankas leading mobile operator, with a
subscriber market share of over 39% at end-September 2012.
Related Criteria
Corporate Rating Methodology (August 2012)
Corporates
Dialog Axiata PLC Telecommunications Median Emerging BB Cat Median
Source: Company data; Fitch
Leverage
Interest Cover
5.0
50.0
4.0
40.0
3.0
30.0
2.0
20.0
1.0
10.0
0.0
0.0
2009
Fitchs expectations are based on the
agencys internally produced,
conservative rating case forecasts.
They do not represent the forecasts of
rated issuers individually or in
aggregate. Key Fitch forecast
assumptions include:
FFO profitability to dip below 30%,
due mainly to expiry of tax holiday;
FCF to remain positive in the medium
term;
2010
2011
2012
2013F 2014F
(LKRm)
8,562
4,066
4,066
1,278
8,067
10,453
Definitions
Leverage: Gross debt plus lease
adjustment minus equity credit for
hybrid instruments plus preferred
stock divided by FFO plus gross
interest paid plus preferred dividends
plus rental expense.
Interest cover: FFO plus gross
interest paid plus preferred dividends
divided by gross interest paid plus
preferred dividends.
FCF/revenue: FCF after dividends
divided by revenue.
FFO profitability: FFO divided by
revenue.
For further discussion of the
interpretation of the tables and
graphs in this report, see Fitchs
Interpreting the New EMEA and AsiaPacific Corporates Credit Update Format,
2010
2011
2012
2013F 2014F
2012
2013F 2014F
2012
2013F 2014F
FCF/Revenues
including Fitch expectations
20%
15%
10%
5%
Source: Fitch
0%
-5%
2009
2009
2010
2011
FFO Profitability
Capex/CFO
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013F 2014F
2010
2011
Revenue (LHS)
EBITDA (LHS)
FFO net adj leverage (RHS)
(LKRm)
70,000
2009
Mobile
Fixed
5.2%
TV
7.7%
60,000
3
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
2.3%
10.9%
86.8%
10,000
0
2009
0
2010
2011
87.1%
Corporates
Figure 1
31 Dec 11
41,526
23.70
6,081
13,880
33.43
20.19
7.68
45,637
10.17
6,218
16,523
36.21
27.87
12.94
41,423
15.79
5,827
15,631
37.74
25.00
17.65
35,774
-1.39
-106
9,561
26.73
15.90
1.53
36,278
6.30
719
8,571
23.63
13.44
-56.94
40.79
64.14
11.98
0.58
1.50
44.38
45.32
15.10
0.98
1.86
15.51
16.49
8.78
1.31
2.08
3.54
3.56
2.90
0.33
1.06
4.63
4.33
3.45
-1.16
0.30
1.15
0.83
1.47
0.84
1.87
1.52
3.74
3.18
3.76
3.57
757
1.34
2.06
16.51
757
1.67
1.70
20.46
818
2.08
2.21
21.38
908
3.93
3.95
1.33
952
3.98
3.75
-54.45
1.34
1.67
2.08
3.93
3.98
Liquidity
(Free cash flow+available cash+committed facils)/(st debt +
interest) (%)
170.48
264.41
221.95
84.63
-115.56
5,842
n.a.
5,631
15,611
n.a.
n.a.
21,242
4,540
25,782
n.a.
25,782
10,452
n.a.
6,055
17,018
1,250
n.a.
24,323
4,540
28,863
n.a.
28,863
5,434
n.a.
5,383
20,123
3,750
n.a.
29,255
4,945
34,201
n.a.
34,201
5,295
n.a.
7,237
24,729
3,750
n.a.
35,715
5,446
41,162
n.a.
41,162
1,646
n.a.
14,092
13,631
4,500
n.a.
32,223
5,713
37,937
n.a.
37,937
13,880
-216
-97
n.a.
4,957
8,610
6,951
15,562
n.a.
-10,373
-1,996
3,193
-3,365
n.a.
1,751
1,580
16,523
-213
-106
n.a.
-237
15,966
257
16,223
n.a.
-8,719
-1,597
5,907
-11
n.a.
4,056
9,951
15,631
-655
-95
n.a.
-841
14,040
75
14,115
-13
-6,790
0
7,312
n.a.
n.a.
-713
6,598
9,561
-1,828
-76
n.a.
24
7,681
2,611
10,292
n.a.
-9,745
0
548
n.a.
n.a.
-390
157
8,571
-1,265
-60
n.a.
653
7,898
-1,100
6,799
n.a.
-23,064
-4,392
-20,657
n.a.
n.a.
-1,268
-21,925
64
3
238
46
5
55
67
4
49
103
7
53
104
12
50
(LKRm)
Profitability
Revenue
Revenue growth (%)
Operating EBIT
Operating EBITDA
Operating EBITDA margin (%)
FFO return on adjusted capital (%)
Free cash flow margin (%)
Coverages (x)
FFO gross interest coverage
Operating EBITDA/gross interest expense
FFO fixed charge coverage (inc. rents)
FCF debt-service coverage
Cash flow from operations/capital expenditures
Debt leverage of cash flow (x)
Total debt with equity credit/operating EBITDA
Total debt less unrestricted cash/operating EBITDA
Debt leverage including rentals (x)
Annual hire lease rent costs for long-term assets (reported and/or
estimate)
Gross lease adjusted debt/operating EBITDAR
Gross lease adjusted debt /FFO+Int+rentals
FCF/lease adjusted debt (%)
Debt leverage including leases and pension adjustment (x)
Pension and lease adjusted debt /EBITDAR + pension cost
31 Dec 08
Source: Fitch
Corporates
The ratings above were solicited by, or on behalf of, the issuer, and therefore, Fitch
has been compensated for the provision of the ratings.
ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS.
PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK:
HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS.
IN
ADDITION,
RATING
DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S
PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND
METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT,
CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER
RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT
SECTION OF THIS SITE.
Copyright 2013 by Fitch, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. One State Street Plaza, NY, NY 10004.Telephone: 1-800-753-4824,
(212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights
reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings, Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other
sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with
its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are
available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitchs factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it
obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the
rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the
management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon
procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability
of independent and competent third-party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer,
and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitchs ratings should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party
verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the
issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and
other reports. In issuing its ratings Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements
and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions
about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings can be affected
by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided as is without any representation or warranty of any kind. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the
creditworthiness of a security. This opinion is based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and
updating. Therefore, ratings are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating.
The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged
in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are
not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is
neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in
connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at anytime for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch.
Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not
comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of
payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating
securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch
will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guaran tor, for a single
annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment,
publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any
registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or
the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be
available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.