Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1Introduction
India is one of the Worlds second largest producers
of textiles and garments. Today India is recognized as
one of the leading sourcing destinations for readymade
garments in both knitted and woven sectors. But Indian
Garment industry is facing the greatest challenge from
shorter fashion cycle, highly volatile market, higher
disposable income and new emerging manufacturing
bases emerging all over the globe. Shorter lead time and
smaller order quantity is the bi product of shorter
fashion cycle which in turn demands for a
manufacturing layout that is flexible and with efficient
and quick response production system. It has become
increasingly important to economically manufacture
products in smaller and smaller batches. On one hand
new management philosophies demand that product
lead times (both development and manufacturing times)
are kept as small as possible. On the other hand, product
Customization has increased, thereby increasing the
number of parts in a product family. As a result batch
sizes have reduced and continue to shrink [6]. Garment
manufacturing units in India are embracing and
adopting the various new manufacturing concepts like
5S, Kaizen, Poka Yoke, SMED (Single Minute
61-1
SMED (Single-Minute Exchange of Die) methodology in Garment manufacturing Industry: Case study in reducing Style Change over Time
61-2
5th International & 26th All India Manufacturing Technology, Design and Research Conference (AIMTDR 2014) December 12th14th, 2014, IIT
Guwahati, Assam, India
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
61-3
SMED (Single-Minute
Minute Exchange of Die) methodology iin
n Garment manufacturing Industry: Case study in reducing Style Change over Time
400
350
59
250
Batch Setting
Time
200
24%
150
Machine time
300
Time in minutes
100
11
50
6%
Case 1
going style: Knitted Ladies polo shirt (Basic
Out-going
style)
New style to be loaded: Knitted Ladies top with
metal zippers at the back (Critical Style)
250
Machine time
49%
Time in minutes
200
150
22%
25%
100
Demonstration time
50
4
Time delay due to
operator
Machine time
Batch Setting
time
Machine time
Demonstratio
n time
Time delay
due to
operator
61-4
5th International & 26th All India Manufacturing Technology, Design and Research Conference (AIMTDR 2014) December 12th14th, 2014, IIT
Guwahati, Assam, India
Implementation of SMED:
Supervisor(LS)
Actual
Before
SMED
After
SMED
Layout
Planning
External
Internal
Sparingly
External
External
Layout
Change
Machine
movement
Internal
Internal
Internal
Internal
Internal
Sparingly
External
Internal/
External
Machine
Maintenance
Machine
setting
Demonstrati
on
Style
Analysis
WIP
planning
Trims Status
Internal/
External
Internal/
External
Internal/
External
External
Internal
Internal
Internal/
External
Internal/
External
Internal/
External
External
External
Internal
External
External
Internal
External
External
Internal
External
External
Internal
External
Operator
Allocation
Buffer
Allocation
Internal
Internal
(LI)/Line
Supervisor(LS)
Repair and fine tuning
of the idle machines are
done during the run
down period. Action:
Mechanic /Technician
Gauge setting, Needle
plate setting and
Machine oiling starts
from Run Down time
and spills over to Set Up
time. Action:
Mechanic /Technician
Attachment and folders
are attached first on to
the idle machine during
the run down period.
Action: Mechanic
/Technician.
Machine cleaning starts
from the run down
period. Action :
Operator
Un raveling of bobbin
thread and filling of
bobbin thread starts
from Run Down period.
Spare Bobbins are also
used. Action: Operator
Fine tuning of machines
such as SPI, thread
tension, presser foot
setting etc. were done
during Run Down and
Set Up time. Action:
Operator
Changing needle and
threading starts from
Run Down time and
spills over to Set Up
time. Action: Operator
After Implementation
Identification of
machine is done during
Run down period of the
previous style. Action: :
Line In charge
Before Implementation
Style Analysis was
done during the Set Up
time. Action:
Production Manager
(PM) / Line In charge
(LI) / Line Supervisor
(LS).
After Implementation
Style Analysis is done
much before the Set up
time and critical
operations and Bottle
neck operations are
identified for special
attention and
demonstration. Action:
61-5
SMED (Single-Minute Exchange of Die) methodology in Garment manufacturing Industry: Case study in reducing Style Change over Time
Preparation of Mock
Samples was done
during Set up time.
Action LI / LS
Ensuring sealed
sample, WIP (cut
parts), trims,
measurement charts
were done only during
Set up time. Action:
PM / LI / LS
Templates are made
during Set up time.
Action: PM / LI / LS
PM/ LI / LS.
Layout plan and
Machine plan is done
much before the Set Up
time. Action: PM / LS
Operators list is
prepared as per the skill
matrix for the new style
during the Run Down
time. Action: PM / LI /
LS
Preparation of Mock
Samples to be
completed much before
Set up time. Action: LI
/LS
Ensuring sealed
sample, WIP (cut
parts), trims, and
measurement charts
etc. to be done only
during Set up time.
Action: PM / LI / LS
Templates are made
much before Set up
time. Action: PM / LI /
LS
After Implementation
Demonstration for
critical operations
commences as soon as
the Run down time
starts. This can be
parallel operation.
Action: PM/ LI / LS
Re demonstration was
reduced as operators
allocation is pre
planned according to
skill matrix.
Run
Down
Time
6:45:00
Set Up
Time
4:43:00
Run Up
Time
8: 55:00
Chart Title
Axis Title
250
200
150
100
50
0
Machine time
Batch Setting
Time
Demonstratio
n time
Time delay
due to
operator
Before
90
99
200
15
After
113
22
121
10
61-6
5th International & 26th All India Manufacturing Technology, Design and Research Conference (AIMTDR 2014) December 12th14th, 2014, IIT
Guwahati, Assam, India
References
S. Shingo, A revolution in manufacturing, the
SMED system, 1985, Productivity Press.
M.C. Eti, S.O.T. Ogaji, S.D. Robert,
Implementing total productive maintenance in
Nigerian manufacturing industries, Appl Energy,
2004, Vol. 79, pp. 38540
C. Moxham, R. Greatbanks, Prerequisites for the
implementation of the SMED methodology: A
study in a textile processing environment,
International Journal of Qual Reliab Man, 2001,
vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 404414.
J. Santos, Richard A. Jose M. Improving
Production with Lean Thinking, ISBN: 978-0-47175486-2, pp. 89-115.
Ulutas Berna (2011) An Application of SMED
Methodology World Academy of Science,
Engineering and Technology, pp. 100-103
S. Shingo, A Revolution in Manufacturing: The
SMED System, Portland:Productivity Press
Inc,1985
R.R. Joshi, G.R. Nair, An Application of SMED
Methodology: A Case Study in Small Scale
Industry, (Aug 2012) International Journal of
Scientific Research Publication, Vol.2 Iss.8, ISSN
2250-3153
P. Hines, N. Rich (1997) The seven value stream
mapping tools International Journal of Operation
and Production Management, Vol.24, No.10,
pp.994-1011
H. Sun, R. Yam, N.G. Wai-Keung, The
implementation and evaluation of Total Productive
Maintenance (TPM) - an action case study in a
Hong Kong manufacturing company, Int J Adv
Manuf Technol, 2003, vol. 22, pp. 224228.
L. Bamber, B.G. Dale, Lean production: A study
of application in a traditional manufacturing
environment, Prod Plan Control, 2000, vol. 11, no.
3, pp. 291298.
C. Moxham, R. Greatbanks, Prerequisites for the
implementation of the SMED methodology: A
study in a textile processing environment, Int J
Qual Reliab Man, 2001, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 404
414.
] A.R. Mileham, S.J. Culley, G.W. Owen, R.I.
McIntosh, Rapid Changeover a pre-requisite for
responsive manufacture, Int J Prod Man, 1999,
vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 785796.
] R.I. McIntosh, S.J. Culley, A.R. Mileham, and
G.W. Owen, A critical evaluation of Shingo's
'SMED' (Single Minute Exchange of Die)
61-7