Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 2

1: welcome to teletubbies show.

In this segment we're going to analyze the contr


oversial moment in a footbal match.
Let us analyze on the match between these 2 teams.
A vs B.Why there are called so controversial match man 2?
2: There are many people out there dissatisfied with the referee's decisions. No
t only 1 decision, man 1,but 4 decisions.
1: Well, let us get to the match highlight between these 2 teams. ---tnjuk video
intro, and 1st highlight--*****For the 1st controversial.****
1: Oh no no no, that should not be a foul. It was a clean tackle
2: I agree with u man 1, he(nazri) tackles the ball cleanly. Touches the ball 1s
t and later Safuan fell down. Surely not a foul.
If i recall, at that time, A is in the middle of attacking on the left wing. The
n after that clean foul, the referee
has given a foul and a free kick for A.
1: Let us see in a slow motion to see whether it touches the ball 1st or the pla
yer. --show slow motion video-2: As the defender slides to tackle the ball, his leg touches the ball 1st befor
e his leg has a contact on the player.
Could it be the player dive to get a free kick man 1?
1: yes maybe he dives to get the free kick because the space for him that time i
s very tight to pass though the opponent
so he took the oppurtunity to dive. we cant blame the refree to misjudge as the
position of the refree is not good to judge the tackles
2: Cant agree with you more, man 1. Not a foul to, a good tackle by the defender
.
1: let us see for the next controversial highlight.---shows 2nd highlight, goal
gna tangan
***For the 2nd controversial****
1: What can you see on the highlight, man 2?
2: A free header to the net from a cross which leads to a goal for B team.
1: *laugh* well actually the striker does not head the ball, instead of using hi
s hand to punch the ball to the net
2: wait. wait. wait. it tought it was a header.
1: let us repeat the highlight in slowmotion --repeat highlight in slowmotion-see there, his head does not touch the ball but his left/right hand. which leads
to a counted goal.
2: I almost fail for his trick to, man 1.*laugh*. That's a foul not a goal. and
probably a red card for him. Intentionally using
his hand to score.
1: Yep, agree with you man 1. A worst decision made by the referee. a goal has b
een given what a terrible decision in an important game
it should be a foul and a red card.
and there's another foul should be given here, let us see ---show 3rd highlight,
case zidane-**For 3rd highlight**
2: Definitely a red card, man 1. Headbutt the opponent player's chest intentiona
lly. or at least a foul should be given
1: yeah man 2, i agree with you. however the referee did not see them at that ti
me. He cannot just call for a foul if he didnt
see that. that B player knows when to commit a foul.
2: It's true, a bad positioning of the referee at that time. if and only if the
referee saw that, A can have an advantage on
number of man due to the fould tht lead to a red card. But unfortunately, the re
feree didnt saw that.
1: Cant agree with you more, man 2. There's a moment for the equalizer from Safu
an's low shot. But it didnt count. let us take
a look on that moment. --- shows 4th highlight, goal safuan x dkira-*** For 4th highlight***
1: from that distance, the referee disallowed the goal because the referee claim

ed it is not across the line. However if


we look on the side and upper view. the ball had across the line. ---shows highl
ight from side and upper camera-2: You're right, man 1. it should be a goal. the ball had across the line but th
e referee decision to disallowed the goal
cause A team to miss the chance to equalize.
1: A really important goal for A team to comeback yet it is disallowed. A team l
ost 3 points by a one-nil defeat against B team.
--shows the end highlight-1: what can we conclude from the match sir?
2: a terrible decision from the referee can lead to an ugly match. it should be
a tie if the goal is counted.
1: Well, that's all from us from Teletubbies Sports.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi