Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
G N Alexandrov
and
G V Podporkyn
INTRODUCTIOI?
i7Tmmma
P
distribution of field strength over the conductor surface, k,, as shov6 in references
(2) and ( 3 ) ,
=$nr, ufi kn
Et?h7X
where n and r are the number of subconductors per phas8 and their radius, respectively.
The upper limit on E
is set by the requirement of corona-f%&
and radio-interference limiting (E ,C Ea, the allowable
field strength). %%refore,
a minimum surface area of conductors and thus minimum
wind and ice loads of conductors and towers
and a minimum possible
obtain with E
k
Substitutm
xa = E into (2) and taltfng the ratio of %%nsmi?ted
power to S a
yields
S _ = 120r F J k n -60% TO x j kn
(3)
pn
AEcl
Ea
whereF = F n = x r 2 Z n , de = 0.61 to 0.67
and F is tRe cross-8ection of phase subconductors.
It follows from these equations that the ratio S/P is determined by the ratio between
conduct% cross-section and surface area per
unit length, F/A, or the ratio between the
electron gas flux, F e j = I, and the f l u x of
the vector of field strength through a unit
length of the conductor surface, A-E /kn.
The other way around, a specified ra%o SIPn
corresponds with a well defined ratio, between conductor cross-section and surface
area per unit length, F/A.
Hence, in order to transmit power economically through overhead lines, it is necessary to emure a certain ratio between conductor cross-section and surface area per unit
length,
As can be seen, the smaller the required ratio S/P , the smaller the ratio F/A that
must benensured, which, by virtue of ( 4 ) . 18
equivalent to the requirement to reduce ro
and/o r X
(5)
227
TABL3 2
Imiinirlwn
1 h x c - t o-phase spaciws
_-____
35
j =
k': Ac-
1.35
?y;
0.75
6.25
l.3
10.6
i-57-
80
~
12.5
15.1
31i:4G1
2x3-
I n table 2 , k is tile rated voitage surge fact o i - currently adopted in the USSX (at left)
nnd tha-t:.iith deep vo1tac;e surge suppression
(at ri",ht); G .
nnd GI.,,., are the miniinm ph~sc-to-~~~s~t-pacin&g
&"determined
by
the conditions of reliable operation under
lichtnin; *urges ncoordin,n to the USSR Electric Installation Code and under switching
surges, respectively.
2efcrring to table
2, if w e adopt on i? 35-kV ~
line, c geonotric mean conductor-to-conductor
spacing of 0.5 n, ,which can be ensured by inst:,.llin& tvio 01- three insulator spacers in a
s p a n , the 3 I L of the line with single conduct o r s increases to 4.2 - 4.8 X J depending on
conductor diLunoter. This appreciably affects
the regime of the lines as compared to lines
of t h e s m e concuctor cross-section with
t r e d i t 3 . o n a l phase spacings.
Similarly, w i t h the uae of the minimum insulation spacings according t o table 2 and fi? w e 1 for n 110-kV line, the SIL of the line
increases to 3C - 43 J W . The regimes are altered accordingly i3.s shown in reference ( l )
?educed conductor spacings do not solve com3 1 c t e l y t h e problem of inproving the regimes
of overhead lines :.iith relatively thick conductors. This brings about the need for conductor bundles. F o r three or more subconductors p e r p h a s e , it is advantazeous to use
flat phases since t h e y o n s u r e a more compact
line desipn as cho1-mby Alexandrov et a1.(4).
3VALUATIGN OF T I E DESIGN PARAKSTERS OF
220-kV LIiTCS L I Z F M T PHASES
228
ratio h/G was varied for the average working
capacitance to be equal to the allowable value as determined by the requirement of limiting the field strength nt the conductor
surface,
E o = ca
'
(7)
where q is the allowable charCe at the s u r face ofaa phase. The S I L of a line may be
expressed through the average working capacitance C-,
" according to reference ( 3 ) , a s
p, = 3%i
, =3vc0 u;
(9)
For an approximate evaluation of the parameters of overhead lines, the values of kn,
were adopted on the basis of experience in
the analysis of line parameters presented by
Alexandrov et al. ( 5 ) in accordance with
table 3.
TABLE 3
- Values
of k and r for different
n in flat p f l f a s e s ( P calculated
' f o r .j = 1 . 3 ~ / m
, Osrpn---J-= 3.3 .
n
k
ro (cm)
1
1
2
1.05
3
1.15
4
1.20
5
1.20
6
1.29
1.0
0.95
0.87
0.85
0.85
0.85
___.
40
F o r S/P
( 1 0 ) and figure 2
that, for a specified S/P , the power transmitted decreases with inchasing j , which is
also a result of decreasing ro and Fo.
cies of figure 2 hold true.s8s seen from figure 3, increasing the number of subconductors per phase, i.e., the total cross-secticn
of o phase, increases the ratio h/G, uhich,
for a constant G, implies longer phase crosssections (greater h).
Smaller S/P considerably reduces the phase
size by dragtically decreasing the poner
transmitted (figure 2 ) and, for a specified
S/P , the SIL must be accordin:;ly reduced,
i.e?, the average worki
capacitance of a
phase must be reduced
which is obtained
just by reducing thc phase size.
(3,
229
TIiBLZ 4-~
Parametors
_ _of 35-BV lines
(j =
0.6
1 .2
1.8
2.4
mmm7-7i
REFERENCES
1.
2.
CONCLUSIONS
The use of flat phases and reduced phaso s p e
cings enable the ratio S/P to be confined
to ,C 1 , which considerablynenhances the economic efficiency and quality of power transmission, enables the transmission distance
to be increased and the operational lifetime
of existing systems to be extended with
their increased loads prior to putting into
operation new or reconstructed systems.
G.N.
4.
5. Alexandrov, G J T . ,
6. Alexandrov, G . N . ,
230
Figure lG,,i,as
determined by corona l i m i t i n g
- 110 kV,
r : ( 1 ) - 35 kV, ( 2 )
( 3 ) -'220
kV
VS.
10
18
76
14
12
y 20
c
0.3
ob
124
02
*
2
F i g u r e 2 S ( s o l i d ) and Z ( d a s h e d ) v s . n
i n a flat p h 2 s e s f o r d i f f e r e n t S/Pn:
j = 1.3 A/mm
231
Figure 6
fa
I7
14
13
12
$
<
a a?
10
a
7
6
5
h /G
Figure 5
t? ( s o l i d ) and Pn
f 8 r 35-BV l i n e s :
(dashed)
G =
0.5
VS.
II
h/G