APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University

CET Campus, Thiruvananthapuram

Kerala -695016
India
Academic Audit Report
2015 - 2016

Basic Details
Institution

St.Thomas College of Engineering and Technology

Auditor Name

K M PEETHAMBARAN

Visit

First

Semester Type

Odd

Assessment

Key Aspects

Rating

Auditor Remarks

Compliance to the
Good(4)
Academic Calendar of KTU

Principal's Response
Will continue with
complying to KTU
Calender.

Functioning of students
grievances and appeal
committee

Good(4)

Will take a very serious

approach in terms of
gathering students
grievances and solving
them on a need to need
basis through this
committee.

Functioning of Academic
Discipline & Welfare
committee

Good(4)

Will continue to put in place

a very disciplined
atmosphere.

Student feedback on cocurricular and

extracurricular activities

Fair(3)

No co-curricular activities

Will implement extra

curricular activities.

1.39

Will maintain the same ratio

henceforth.

Average student to faculty Excellent(5)

ratio index

B.Tech
No of B.TechStudents

153

Page No: 1

CIVIL ENGINEERING

Key Aspects

Rating

Auditor Remarks

Principal's Response

No tutorial logbook

Class duration of 1 hour

each has been shortened to
50 minutes each thereby
creating an hour of Tutorial
every working day in the
process. Tutorial log book
and attendance has been
implemented across all
subjects.

All classes are to be made

smart

Will implement the

recommendation.

Lab series exam not

conducted

Has already put in place a

timetable to conduct the
same.

Functioning of class/course Good(4)

committees
Schedule of Time Table

Good(4)

Attendance of students

Excellent(5)

Quantity & Quality of

Good(4)
Assignments/Mini Projects
Conduct of Tutorial Classes Poor(2)

Syllabus coverage as per

course plan

Good(4)

Use of ICT enabled

Fair(3)
teaching & Digital courses
Conduct of Practical
classes

Good(4)

Syllabus coverage of
practical courses

Good(4)

Evaluation of students
performance in practical
classes

Fair(3)

Conduct of
remedial/bridge classes

Very Poor(1)

Maintenance of course
diary

Good(4)

Student feedback on
curriculum coverage

Good(4)

Student feedback on
infrastructural facilities

Good(4)

Not started. No register.

Remedial classes in
(Bridge course conducted) progress after analysing the
performance of weak
students.

Page No: 2

MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

Key Aspects

Rating

Auditor Remarks

Principal's Response

No tutorial logbook

Class duration of 1 hour

each has been shortened to
50 minutes each thereby
creating an hour of Tutorial
every working day in the
process. Tutorial log book
and attendance has been
implemented across all
subjects.

All classes are to be made

smart

Will implement the

recommendation.

lab series exam not

conducted

Has already put in place a

timetable to conduct the
same.

Functioning of class/course Good(4)

committees
Schedule of Time Table

Good(4)

Attendance of students

Excellent(5)

Quantity & Quality of

Good(4)
Assignments/Mini Projects
Conduct of Tutorial Classes Poor(2)

Syllabus coverage as per

course plan

Good(4)

Use of ICT enabled

Fair(3)
teaching & Digital courses
Conduct of Practical
classes

Good(4)

Syllabus coverage of
practical courses

Good(4)

Evaluation of students
performance in practical
classes

Fair(3)

Conduct of
remedial/bridge classes

Very Poor(1)

Maintenance of course
diary

Good(4)

Student feedback on
curriculum coverage

Good(4)

Student feedback on
infrastructural facilities

Good(4)

Not started. No Register.

Remedial classes in
(Bridge course conducted) progress after analysing the
performance of weak
students.

Page No: 3

ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION ENGG

Key Aspects

Rating

Auditor Remarks

Principal's Response

No tutorial logbook

Class duration of 1 hour

each has been shortened to
50 minutes each thereby
creating an hour of Tutorial
every working day in the
process. Tutorial log book
and attendance has been
implemented across all
subjects.

All classes are to be made

smart

Will implement the

recommendation.

lab series exam not

conducted

Has already put in place a

timetable to conduct the
same.

Functioning of class/course Good(4)

committees
Schedule of Time Table

Good(4)

Attendance of students

Excellent(5)

Quantity & Quality of

Good(4)
Assignments/Mini Projects
Conduct of Tutorial Classes Poor(2)

Syllabus coverage as per

course plan

Good(4)

Use of ICT enabled

Fair(3)
teaching & Digital courses
Conduct of Practical
classes

Good(4)

Syllabus coverage of
practical courses

Good(4)

Evaluation of students
performance in practical
classes

Fair(3)

Conduct of
remedial/bridge classes

Very Poor(1)

Maintenance of course
diary

Good(4)

Student feedback on
curriculum coverage

Good(4)

Student feedback on
infrastructural facilities

Good(4)

Not started. No Register.

Remedial classes in
(Bridge course conducted) progress after analysing the
performance of weak
students.

Page No: 4

COMPUTER SCIENCE &

ENGINEERING

Key Aspects

Rating

Auditor Remarks

Principal's Response

No tutorial logbook

Class duration of 1 hour

each has been shortened to
50 minutes each thereby
creating an hour of Tutorial
every working day in the
process. Tutorial log book
and attendance has been
implemented across all
subjects.

All classes are to be made

smart

Will implement the

recommendation.

Lab series exam not

conducted

Has already put in place a

timetable to conduct the
same.

Functioning of class/course Good(4)

committees
Schedule of Time Table

Good(4)

Attendance of students

Excellent(5)

Quantity & Quality of

Good(4)
Assignments/Mini Projects
Conduct of Tutorial Classes Poor(2)

Syllabus coverage as per

course plan

Good(4)

Use of ICT enabled

Fair(3)
teaching & Digital courses
Conduct of Practical
classes

Good(4)

Syllabus coverage of
practical courses

Good(4)

Evaluation of students
performance in practical
classes

Fair(3)

Conduct of
remedial/bridge classes

Very Poor(1)

Maintenance of course
diary

Good(4)

Student feedback on
curriculum coverage

Good(4)

Not started. No Register.

Remedial classes in
(Bridge course conducted) progress after analysing the
performance of weak
students.

Page No: 5

Student feedback on
infrastructural facilities

Good(4)

Page No: 6