Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
A BOOK REVIEW
PRESENTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS
FOR THE COURSE
THE REFORMATION IN THE NEW WORLD
DEPARTMENT OF HISTORICAL THEOLOGY
JAKE BELDER
27 JANUARY 2010
It is a challenge to write history well, especially when it is designed to be an
America. Mark Noll’s The Old Religion in a New World (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans,
2002) does just that, however. A highly readable and sufficiently detailed account, Noll
sets out to “explain what was new about the outworking of organized religion on [the
North American] continent by comparison with the European origins of that religion”
(ix).
Interacting primarily with the context of the United States, Noll’s main contention
is that American Christianity differs significantly from its European roots and has been
shaped to a large degree by four factors: the sheer size of America, ethnic and racial
European Christianity. What he sets out to demonstrate, quite simply, is that Christianity
The European settlers who came to North America found themselves in what
must have seemed to be a geographically boundless land, and Noll suggests that this is
one of the most obvious reasons why the religion of the New World differed significantly
from that of the Old. The wide open spaces “gave churches the kind of breathing room
that simply had not existed before. This breathing room allowed Christian groups that had
felt confined in Europe a chance to develop their own religious visions out of their own
internal resources” (12). As an example, Noll mentions the Baptists, who “developed
took the initiative in forming new churches (64). Another factor of particular significance
1
in the new American republic was the use of revivals by the Methodists and the Baptists
to reach an exploding population in the great expanses of the new nation. “The essence of
One of the reasons revivalism saw such success was because the basic essence of the
Christian message remained the same as that of the Old World while at the same time
appealing to the virtues and values of the liberal culture of the new republic. Noll
highlights Charles Finney as representative of this age, with “his willingness to adjust
historic patterns of Protestant faith and practice in order to reach the new towns and cities
Another significant factor in the shaping of Christianity in the New World was the
multiethnic nature of America, a trait it bore right from its inception, as Europeans from
various backgrounds settled in the new land. Noll points out that historians are quick to
stress the role ethnicity played in the history of Catholicism in North America, but are
less inclined to do so when discussing Protestant history. Yet, many of the nation’s
earliest Protestant churches were “distinctly ethnic” (15), and even today many different
the religious history of this new land, is to recognize “that from the beginning, settlement
by Africans took place alongside settlement by Europeans” (14). Noll, in fact, identifies
the African American population as being the most significant ethnic contribution to
2
North American Christianity, and gives due attention to the ways in which they
Of the factors shaping Christianity in the New World, it is religious pluralism that
Noll devotes the most attention too. He notes that “the stupendous array of churches,
para-church agencies, forms of Christian worship, and modes of Christian action has
often been one of the most striking features of North American religious life” (18), and
that this gives North America “a scope of religious diversity hardly matched anywhere
else in the world” (21). This pluralist character was evident almost right away due to
panoply of different traditions and ethnicities that settled in the New World. “Almost
without noticing it, their presence together in one place was breaking up the European
ideal of a unified Christendom” (35). However, this was not what Colonial-era Christians
originally intended, and many Protestants (particularly the Puritans and Anglicans) found
it to be a major difficulty as they tried to implement the European ideal of “one church
for one place” (50) in their new land. As well, the pioneering spirit of the American
people, bolstered by the ideals of liberty and freedom, empowered ordinary individuals
“to think and act for themselves,” which in turn “produced tremendous expansionary
energy in the churches, but…also fueled an ecclesiastical centrifuge” (100). While this
centrifuge would lose some of its energy as it moved toward the twentieth century,
energy would be taken over by others groups, especially Catholics, and the various
sectarian groups such as the Mormons, who would continue to grow rapidly.
Finally, Noll identifies the absence of the confessional conservatism that marked
3
World. North American churches adapted to “a prevailing cultural liberalism, with
state was the outworking of the desire for religious freedom among the Colonists, but
also meant that churches were forced to compete for adherents. Inevitably, “churches and
denominations that mastered the techniques of persuasion flourished” (84). Churches that
attempted to preserve the confessional nature of the European churches found themselves
upon higher authorities than the vox populi; and to privilege ancestral, traditional, or
hierarchical will over individual choice” (24). Noll demonstrates that churches still
bearing this vestige of their European heritage, especially those identified as mainline
Protestants, often find themselves on the fringes and, in the modern era, in numerical
decline. The notable exception to this is the Roman Catholic Church, which is “a
Christian tradition grounded in the Old World that has matured into a church at home in
America” (138). Facing a great deal of hostility from Protestants when they first settled in
America, Catholics have now become “overwhelmingly the most important Christian
denomination in the country” (177). Noll devotes significant attention to the triumphs of
argues that there were two overarching factors that laid the groundwork for Christianity
to flourish and take the shape it did, and to become such an integral part of American
4
culture. First, Noll writes, it is important to recognize that the first Protestants in the New
World
were predominantly from the British Isles rather than the Continent. They
were also more likely to be Reformed (that is, Calvinist) than either
Lutheran or Anabaptist…These Protestants thought that discipline for God
should be exerted in the world. Family life, business practices, political
decisions, management of leisure time—all such concerns should be
pursued with religious seriousness. Thus it was that, as these Reformed
Protestants came to America, they were seeking not a private space to be
religious but a free space for their religion to transform (45-46).
Noll compares the success of the Reformed Protestants in America to their earlier success
in Europe, where they had “so effectively integrated religion and society” (46). While
other religious influences would come to bear on American culture, few would be as
significant as this.
The second factor is the legacy of the separation of church and state. One of the
most notable differences in the religious cultures of America and Europe, it is somewhat
paradoxical that this would be a fundamental tenant of a nation whose culture and society
Nowhere has the principle of the separation of church and state become a
matter of such general, almost dogmatic significance as in American
Christianity, and nowhere, on the other hand, is the participation of the
churches in the political, social, economic, and cultural events of public
life so active and so influential as in the country where there is no state
church (276).
Despite the seeming contradiction, it is this freedom which gave religion in America the
opportunity to flourish, and gave the people, for good or for ill, the chance to redefine
5
As is often the case with a book serving as an introduction to a subject, the reader
is left wanting more. This, perhaps, is both positive and negative; on the one hand, the
author has achieved his aim—namely, piquing the interest of his readers to learn more
while having satisfied their initial curiosity about the subject; and on the other hand, it
means there are potentially some deficiencies in his treatment. In the case of The Old
Religion in a New World, the scales lean heavily toward the former, with a few
exceptions. For example, Noll continually offers teasers regarding the practical
occasions. One such instance of this is in the chapter on theology, where, quoting
Frenchman Claude-Jean Bertrand, “the laxity, the syncretism, the utilitarianism, the
secularization, [and] the nationalization of the church” (186) are noted as characteristics
of American theological reflection without drawing out the implications of that in any
significant way. Noll also briefly notes the way in which religion and politics intermix in
the American context, although this is worthy of considerably more attention than he
gives it, especially considering the juxtaposition of this with the separation of church and
state.
developments in Mexico and Canada is commendable, one cannot help feel that these
histories could be left out of the present volume. He demonstrates that there are some
similarities in these histories to that of the United States, but that they are also marked by
“immense differences” (209). Having stated that, the reader cannot help but think that if
these differences are that significant, they deserve separate and more extensive treatment.
6
Incidentally, this would have given Noll more room to expand on the practical
Noll has succeeded in providing a lucid and cohesive introduction to the complex and
fascinating history of North American Christianity. Noll concludes The Old Religion in a
New World with a succinct and helpful summary of American Christianity, observing that
He thus helps the reader to draw a fair and balanced conclusion, avoiding romanticism on
the one hand, and wholesale disapproval on the other. Noting that the history of
of Christian integrity, Noll then turns to the future and remarks that “not historical
scholarship but an ability to hear the gospel and to act upon it will determine which of