Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Facts
Main contention of appellee
Issues
Ruling
i. If the case has two or more issues, then please
answer these issues separately in the ruling.
ii. Example:
Issues: (a) Whether a is equivalent to b
(b) Whether 1 + 1 = 4
Ruling: (a) No, a is not equivalent to b.
(b) No. The Court held that 1+1=2.
3. Try to cite the parties using their name, rather than by using
petitioner, appellant, respondent, etc.
Sample Digest
Cheryll Santos Leus v. St. Scholasticas College Westgrove
GR No. 187226
January 28, 2015
J. Reyes
Facts: Santos is a non-teaching personnel of St. Scholasticas College, a
Catholic educational institution. She engaged in pre-marital sex, got
pregnant out of wedlock, married the father of her child and was
dismissed, in that order. St. Scholastica argues that the dismissal was
valid for engaging in pre-marital sex and getting pregnant is
tantamount to serious misconduct and conduct unbecoming of an
employee of a Catholic school.
Issue: Whether Santos pregnancy out of wedlock constitutes a valid
ground to terminate her employment.
Ruling: No. That petitioner was employed by a Catholic educational
institution
per se does not absolutely determine whether her
pregnancy out of wedlock is disgraceful or immoral. There must be a
(a) consideration of the totality of circumstances surrounding the
conduct and an (b) assessment of said circumstances against what the
society generally considers moral and respectable.
In considering what is moral and respectable however, it should
be public and secular morality which should determine the prevailing
norms of conduct, not religious morality. Santos pregnancy is not
disgraceful or immoral as she and the father of her child had no
impediment to marry each other.
Furthermore, Santos conduct could not have caused such a
grave scandal to the students as she is only a non-teaching personnel,
her interaction with the students is very limited.